the great recession, how does it differ from others? fccc 7 this ‘great’ vs. “normal”...
TRANSCRIPT
The Great Recession, How Does it Differ
From Others?FCCC 7
This ‘great’ vs. “normal” recessionHow Different; How Similar ?
5 years after Lehman …
• http://video.ft.com/2661154716001/Lehmans-legacy-The-world-economy/Markets
Savings Glut ?
• Different? savings glut flowed into poorly regulated shadow banking system• In USA, housing prices rose 30% in five years preceding crisis.
Housing booms also in UK, Spain, Eastern Europe (earlier scandanavian, japan)
• Similar to previous in e.g. debt build up
Goods Market Eqbm (Closed)Sd = Id
• Sd = Id so:
• Y – Cd – G = Id => (Cd + Id + G) = Y
• If unsold goods: I > Id • diseqbm, but expenditure approach still true Y = C + I
+ G
• At r0, I0 > S0: amount firms wish to invest > amount savers want to lend so in closed economy, r↑
• (assume NFP = 0, so NX = CA)
Open Economy Goods Market Eqbm
NXIS dd
What can be done with national savings ?
I: lend to domestic firms buying new capital goods
CA surplus: lend to foreigners who want to purchase your goods (more than you want to buy their’s)
• Assume nation too small to have any influence on world interest rate
Small Open Economy Model
r I S
rROW
• Assume 2 nations in world
• rWORLD adjusts until int’l lending = int’l borrowing (eqbm r)
• Nation with relatively high ID has high rAUTARKY
• Nation with relatively low ID has low rAUTARKY
• Eqbm rWORLD rate lies between 2 autarky rates
Large Open Economy Model
r I S
rROW
Similar 1:Asset Price Boom
Agnello, Schuknecht (2011)
1971
Similar 2.Credit Boom
• Boom:• Y, C & I rise above trend
in build-up phase (then fall below in bust phase)
• Higher PHouse • Real exchange rate
appreciates • CA deficit
Similar 3:Marginal Loans & Systemic Risk
• Households bought marginal assets requiring excellent conditions to pay off
• Subprime => debt servicing sensitive to recessions & changes in credit/monetary conditions• Housing loans sensitive to PHouse declines (indeed, became non-
performing loans with falling PHouse)
• Many foreign currency denominated loans• In good times required lower interest payments• In crisis, more difficult for borrowers to repay with depreciated
currency
Similar 4:Regulation & Supervision
• Previous post-liberalization credit booms led into crises due to lack of reforms
• Underdeveloped financial systems unable to handle large capital inflows
• In recent crisis, shadow banking system (finance companies, investment banks, off-balance sheet entities) not subject to bank regulation
• Regulators underestimated conflicts of interest of “originate to distribute” model
Different 1:Increased Opaqueness
• Mortgage securitization: greater lender-borrower distance
• No monitoring of loan ‘originators’ who sought greater volumes (not quality)
• Assessing risk difficult so investors had to rely heavily on ratings
• Collateral but value fell limiting security
http://portal.hud.gov/hudportal/HUD?src=/federal_housing_administration
Different 2:Financial Integration
• Benefits of greater financial openness (and more foreign banks)• GDP growth• Develop financial sector • Discipline macro policies• Expose local firms to int’l competition for efficiency gains
• But intensifies cross-border spillovers:• Liquidity pressure• Asset prices• Depletion of bank capital
• (US financial assets represent 31% of world financial assets, USD represent ca 62% of all reserve assets)• Most believed US financial assets offered safety and liquidity
Different 3:Leverage
• Greater leverage • In commercial banks• Also in shadow banking
sector
• Cut ability to absorb even small losses (high LTV => P fall pushed household’s equity negative)
• Led to loss of confidence & greater counterparty risk
Different 4:Households
• 2008: households heavily in debt, especially in subprime• Yet aggregate credit growth more moderate than in previous
recessions• (previous crises due to gov’t or corporations’ debt)
• Low interest rates makes easier to service debt
• Household debt to income also rose in UK, Spain & Ireland
Different 5:Old & New Combined
• Vicious cycle: • Rising foreclosures• Falling home values• Securitization markets thinned (fewer mortgages so sped up P declines)
• Reinforced by tighter mortgage standards• Rising rates & falling home P limited households’ ability to refinance
mortgages
• Securitized assets’ value unknown (mix of subprime + prime)• MBS less valued as collateral• Higher counterparty risk (didn’t know if counterparty healthy so
stopped trading => freeze in interbank markets)