the great kahuna award !!! tea/tug 2006 conference portland, me october 18-21, 2006 office of...
TRANSCRIPT
THE GREAT KAHUNA AWARD !!!
TEA/TUG 2006 CONFERENCE PORTLAND, ME
OCTOBER 18-21, 2006OFFICE OF PROGRAM
ADMINISTRATION HIPA-30
Agenda
Great Kahuna Award! FHWA/ AASHTO Construction
Management ETG
REPORTING REQIREMENTSFOR FHWA-45, FHWA-810,
AND FHWA-47 FHWA-45: Is required for all projects on the NHS =
> $500,000. Submit two weeks after the award of
contract and no later than the fifth of the month after the end of the quarter.
Information on bid prices for major items
REPORTING FHWA-810: Bid tabulation Is required for all F-A const. project on
the NHS. Submit to Division Administrator. Certified by STA official. Show details on 3 low bidders. Submit within two weeks of the award of
contract.
REPORTING FHWA-47: Is required for all projects on the NHS that are
$1 million or more.
Contractor completes at end of contract.
Information on final costs of wages, salaries and materials used by the contractor.
State DOT personnel verifies information.
Office of Program Administration
UPDATE The GAO conducted a review of FHWA
Form-45 State construction cost. Quality of the data was one big issue. You may view the report at
www.gao.gov , Report # is GAO-04-113R.
BID OPENING REPORT01/01/2005 to 12/31/2005
State # of Bids received
# of contracts
Low bids over/(under)
EE
Alabama 83 25 (2.97)
Alaska 43 10 (3.23)
Arizona 83 26 15.71
Arkansas 15 6 (2.05)
California 0 0 0
Colorado 394 99 4.31
Connecticut 16 6 16.22
BID OPENING REPORT
State # of Bids # of contracts
Low Bids over/(under)
Delaware 19 6 1.50
DC 2 1 (4.42)
Florida 155 44 (0.64)
Georgia 0 0 0
Hawaii 0 0 0
Idaho 52 14 17.6
Illinois * 0 0 0
BID OPENING REPORT
State # of Bids # of Contracts
Low Bids over/(under)
Indiana 68 22 (9.16)
Iowa 0 0 0
Kansas 29 9 6.77
Kentucky 29 20 (12.97)
Louisiana 20 6 (12.51)
Maine 27 13 12.3
Maryland 119 40 7.90
BID OPENING REPORT
State # of Bids # of Contracts
Low Bids over/(under)
Massachusetts 54 14 9.08
Michigan 66 12 1.27
Minnesota * 0 0 0.0
Mississippi 9 4 8.04
Missouri 0 0 0
Montana 14 4 (0.56)
Nebraska 0 0 0
BID OPENING REPORT
State # of Bids # of
ContractsLow Bids over/(under)
Nevada 17 7 4.31
New Hampshire
19 6 (3.09)
New Jersey 12 3 38.10
New Mexico 1 1 12.14
New York 581 133 9.42
North Carolina
26 8 (2.30)
BID OPENING REPORT State # of Bids # of
ContractsLow BidsOver/(under)
North Dakota 85 22 (24.91)
Ohio 369 100 (6.44)
Oklahoma 25 10 (1.68)
Oregon 25 10 8.35
Pennsylvania 89 21 5.48
Puerto Rico 0 0 0
BID OPENING REPORT State # of Bids # of
ContractsLow Bids over/(under)
Rhode Island * 0 0 0
South Carolina 30 9 (3.29)
South Dakota 185 48 75.6
Tennessee 0 0 0
Texas 0 0 0
Utah 89 24 2.60
BID OPENING REPORT State # of Bids # of
ContractsLow BidsOver/(under)
Vermont * 0 0 0.0
Virginia * 0 0 0.0
Washington 43 14 6.05
West Virginia 13 3 1.59
Wisconsin 0 0 0
Wyoming 46 12 2.26
Congratulations Montana DOT!!
State # of Bids # of
ContractsLow Bids over/(under)
Massachusetts 54 14 9.08
Michigan 66 12 1.27
Minnesota * 0 0 0.0
Mississippi 9 4 8.04
Missouri 0 0 0
Montana 14 4 (0.56)
Nebraska 0 0 0
FHWA / AASHTO Construction Management Expert Task Group
2004 Construction Management Scan
Scan Objective
“Examine international construction management procedures with a focus toward
ensuring appropriate project delivery, contract compliance and quality assurance”
Scope of Study
Maintenance and Warranties
Process Improvement
Construction Aspects of CM
Post Construction Aspects of CM
Pre-Construction Aspects of CM
General Context
Project Delivery
Staffing
Procurement
Risk Allocation & Management
Contract Administration
Contract Change Processes
Quality Plan Implementation
Project Record Keeping
Environmental Monitoring
Third Party Communications
Project Maintenance Requirements
Scan Team LocationsTucker FergusonPennDOT
Thomas BohuslavTX DOT Greg Schiess
FHWA, FL
James TriplettUnited Contractors
Steve DeWittNC DOT
Richard WagmanG.A. & F.C. Wagman, Inc.
John Smythe
Iowa DOT
Eugene Hoelker
FHWA, MWRC
Keith Molenaar
U. Colorado, Boulder
Jerry YakowenkoFHWA, HQ
What we found…
Similar transportation needs Construction management systems that
promote alignment of customer goals Integrated use of risk analysis techniques Strategic use of alternative delivery
methods Procurement systems that set the
framework for success
What we found…
Contract payment methods that support alignment and trust
Delegation of traditional highway agency functions that promote efficiency
A philosophy of network management Greater partnership between public and
private entities
CLIENT
CLIENT or CONTRACTOR
CLIENT ADVISOR
CONTRACTOR
PHASE 1
PHASE 2
PHASE 3
PHASE 4
PHASE 5
PHASE 6
PHASE 7
Construction
Operation & Maintenance
Identification of the Problem
Preliminary Study & Recommendation
Feasibility,Public Involvement & Public Announcement.
Contract Preparation & Tender
Planning or Statutory Orders or Transport Act Application
Outline design
PHASE 0
British Highways Agency ExampleEarly Contractor Involvement
British Highways Agency Example
Recommendations Align Team Goals to
Customer Goals Develop Risk Assessment
and Allocation Techniques Strategically Apply
Alternative Delivery Methods Enhance Qualification Rating
Processes Use Qualifications in
Procurement Pilot Early Contractor
Involvement http://international.fhwa.dot.gov/construction_mgmt/contents.htm
Recommendations Apply Alternate Bids/Designs in Procurement Conduct Pre-Proposal Meetings Apply More Contractor Quality Management Use Appropriate Alternative Contract Payment
Methods Work Toward Warranties and Life Cycle
Responsibility
Construction Management ETG
Implementation group for SCAN recommendations
Funding - $300,000 from FHWA National Construction Management
Conference in 2008 State DOT, FHWA, Industry, Academia
representation
Construction Management ETG Members Stuart Anderson, Texas A&M
University Thomas R. Bohuslav, Construction,
Texas DOT Tim Aschenbrener, Materials,
Colorado DOT Bob Burns, CH2M Hill Steven D. DeWitt, (Co-chair), North
Carolina Turnpike Authority Tucker Ferguson, Maintenance
Division, PennDOT Ted Ferragut, TDC Partners, Ltd. Matt Girard, , HBG Flatiron Eugene Hoelker, FHWA Rich Juliano, ARTBA
Mike Loulakis, Attorney, Wickwire Gavin
Keith R. Molenaar, U. of Colorado Jerry Porter, Peter Kiewit Sons', Inc. Greg L. Schiess, FHWA Sid Scott, Trauner Consulting
Services, Inc. John M. Smythe, Construction, Iowa
DOT Jim Sorenson, FHWA James E. Triplett, United
Contractors W Richard Wagman, G.A. & F.C.
Wagman, Inc. Gerald Yakowenko, (Co-chair),
FHWA
Construction Management ETG Current Activities Best Value Implementation Plan.
NCHRP 10-61 - additional case studies (NCHRP Report #561 available in hardcopy)
Pilot Projects under SEP-14 Alternative Payment Methods.
Develop a “white-paper” on current US alternate payment methods– Provide examples that include lump sum payments,
milestones/components, plan quantity, etc. – Include the advantages and disadvantages of each strategy. – Impacts on staffing requirements, material usage approvals, fair and
equitable adjustment of quantities, audits, supporting documentation of claims, prompt payment, historic database for future estimates
Risk Assessment and Allocation Prepare a Risk Assessment and
Allocation Guide for Highway Construction Management Includes: risk identification, assessment,
analysis, mitigation and planning, allocation, monitoring, checklists, examples, etc.
Conduct Risk Workshops
Construction Management ETG Current Activities
Enhance Qualification Rating Process Alternative Bidding State of the Practice Contractor Quality Management Strategic Use of Alternative Delivery Methods Qualifications in Procurement Warranties and Life Cycle Responsibility
Construction Management ETG Future Activities
Questions
Who may I contact for more information about the Construction Management ETG? Steve Dewitt, Co-chair, NCDOT, (919) 715-4458,
[email protected] Jerry Yakowenko, Co-chair, FHWA, (202) 366-1562,
[email protected] Ted Ferragut, Consultant to ETG, 703-836-1671,