“the good old days”
DESCRIPTION
“The Good Old Days”. Are Fading for Michigan’s Local Governments. The “New Normal”. for Michigan’s Local Governments. Presented by: Larry Merrill Michigan Townships Association Executive Director. Michigan Local Government Fiscal Conditions 2014 and going forward. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
“The Good Old Days”
Are Fading for Michigan’s Local Governments
The “New Normal”for Michigan’s Local
Governments
Michigan Local Government Fiscal Conditions 2014 and going forward
Presented by:Larry MerrillMichigan Townships Association Executive Director
The “Good Old Days”
Post-War Twentieth Century
Good Old Days Unparalleled Prosperity
Michigan’s Per Capita Income: Top 5
Detroit Fourth Largest City in United States
Manufacturing Jobs Galore Population Growth Robust Economy (for the most
part)▪ Sales and Income Tax Revenue▪ Housing Starts▪ Income Tax Revenues▪ New Revenue Sharing Program 1971▪ Recessions Infrequent, Short
Duration
For Local Government 1950-1999 Manufacturing Sector
Growth Property Tax Revenues State Shared Revenues Federal Revenue Sharing Expanding Role of Local
Government Federal Categorical
Grants Dot.Com Bubble
Capital Gains Growth
2000-and on Global Economy
Emerges Manufacturing Declines Population Declines State Revenues Plunge Mild Recession 2001-
2003 Severe Financial Sector
Recession 2008-2011
And Michigan’s Image Went from This…
To This…
There is no “Michigan” Economy
We are a state divided:
• Resources• Expectations• Traditions• Infrastructure
The governor’s Regional Prosperity Initiative
Diversity of Michigan’s Local Governments
the Good Old Days are Not Returning…Any Time Soon
THEN NOW
Why the economy is not self correcting:
• Still heavily reliant on declining industries and products
• Aging work force lacks skills for emerging jobs
• Entrepreneurial spirit is lagging• Lackluster immigration• Poor attraction, retention of
knowledge workers
The Data Tells the Story..
The Data Tells The Story…
Source: Bureau of Labor Market Information, Local Area Unemployment Statistics (LAUS)
Source: Bureau of Labor Market Information, Local Area Unemployment Statistics (LAUS)
Source: Bureau of Labor Market Information, Local Area Unemployment Statistics (LAUS)
Source: Bureau of Labor Market Information, Local Area Unemployment Statistics (LAUS)
Source: Bureau of Labor Market Information, Local Area Unemployment Statistics (LAUS)
Source: Bureau of Labor Market Information, Local Area Unemployment Statistics (LAUS)
Source: Bureau of Labor Market Information, Local Area Unemployment Statistics (LAUS)
Source: Bureau of Labor Market Information, Local Area Unemployment Statistics (LAUS)
Source: Bureau of Labor Market Information, Local Area Unemployment Statistics (LAUS)
Source: Bureau of Labor Market Information, Local Area Unemployment Statistics (LAUS)
How the Economy Impacts Michigan Local Governments
Property Tax Collections
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
2010
2012
$- $50,000,000,000
$100,000,000,000 $150,000,000,000 $200,000,000,000 $250,000,000,000 $300,000,000,000 $350,000,000,000 $400,000,000,000
Statewide Total Real and Personal
Property Valuations
Taxable Value
Source: Michigan State Tax Commission
1997
1999
2001
2003
2005
2007
2009
2011
0.0
500.0
1,000.0
1,500.0
2,000.0
2,500.0
3,000.0
Property Tax Revenues By Type of Local Government
citycountytownshipvillage
Year
Reve
nues
in M
illio
ns $
Source: Citizens Research Council
2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003
0
100,000,000
200,000,000
300,000,000
400,000,000
500,000,000
600,000,000
City Income Tax Collections
Total Statewide DetroitLansing
Source: Citizens Research Council
State Shared Revenues
Source: Citizens Research Council
Source: Citizens Research Council
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
$-
$200,000,000
$400,000,000
$600,000,000
$800,000,000
$1,000,000,000
$1,200,000,000
$1,400,000,000
$1,600,000,000
$1,800,000,000
Total Revenue Sharing to Locals
Parks and
recreation
Housing
and comm dev
Solid waste
mgt
Interest
earnings
Other
general revenue
-
200,000
400,000
600,000
800,000
1,000,000
1,200,000
1,400,000
Michigan Local Government Miscellaneous Revenue Source
Changes
FY 2004-05FY 2010-11
Let’s look at some of the expenditure issues
-
500,000
1,000,000
1,500,000
2,000,000
2,500,000Change in Michigan Local Gov-
ernment Expenditures2005-2011
FY 2004-05FY 2010-11
-200,000400,000600,000800,000
1,000,0001,200,000
Change in Michigan Local Gov-ernment Expenditures
2005-2011
FY 2004-05FY 2010-11
Short
-term
Long-t
erm
Pu
blic de
bt for
priva
te pu
rposes
Long-t
erm de
bt iss
ued
Long-t
erm de
bt ret
ired
-
10,000,00020,000,00030,000,00040,000,000
Michigan Local Government Outstanding Debt
FY 2005-2010
FY 2004-05FY 2010-11
Unfunded Liabilities 311 Local Governments Have OPEB Liability
Total Liability is $13.5 billion; Funded at 6% Net Unfunded Liability is $12.7 billion City of Detroit’s OPEB is $4.9 billion (2009) 39% of total for
all local governments 47% are starting to prefund Equates to 20% of all general fund revenues
Total Unfunded Pension Liabilities $3.1 billion (10% of general fund revenues)
Average Annual Benefit per Retiree $8,887 Governmental Activities Total Debt approx $5 billion
• Total General Purpose Local Governments
1,858*
33
• Total Local Governments, Including Special Purpose Districts
2,893*
28
• Local Elected Officials 19.4/10k
26
• Average # Elected Officials Per Local Government
6.6* 38
• General Revenue For State And Local Government Operations
$7,310
32
• Federal Funding For Local Government Services
$1,487
33•U.S. Bureau of the Census data, except where noted
Performance Measure Per State
Capita Ranking
• Number Of Local Government Employees
12.2/1K
43
• Funding From Local Governments’ Sources
$5,823
31
• Property Taxes $1,412
16
• Salaries and Wages, Local Government Employees (noneducational)
$617 37
Performance Measure Per State
Capita Ranking
• Law Enforcement Expenditures $242 28• Fire Protection Expenditures $95 37• Financial Administration (tax collections, assessing, accounting)
$94 44
• Other Government Operations (governing boards, planning and zoning
$68 43
• General Use Public Buildings Expenditures
$38 38
Performance Measure Per State
Capita Ranking
Appropriate Indices of Fiscal Problems Levels versus changes Local government debt Cash solvency (current assets
divided by current liabilities) Debt service divided by total
revenue Inflation-adjusted taxable value
growth
Popular Indices of Fiscal Problems
Munetrix Score
Population GrowthGeneral Fund Expenditures as a Percent of Taxable ValueOperating DeficitSize of Fund BalanceLong-term Debt as a Percent of Taxable Value
Municipalities Subject to Emergency Financial Oversight Allen Park, Emergency Manager Benton Harbor, Emergency Manager Detroit, Emergency Manager Ecorse, Receivership-Transition Advisory Board Flint, Emergency Manager Hamtramck, Emergency Manager Highland Park, Under Review Pontiac, Receivership-Transition Advisory
Board Inkster, Consent Agreement Royal Oak Township, Under Review
Prognostications
Current trends extended forward… Michigan will recover per capita ranking
to the low thirties from 41st
Unemployment remains slightly above national average
State budget modest growth, with some periodic minor recessions
Local Government Fiscal Strength Factors
Factors impactOlder Urban Core negativeLow Average Income negativeHigh Accrued Legacy Costs negativeDependency on Old Manufacturing negativeStruggling Schools negativeLow Civic Engagement negativeDeclining Population negativeDependency on Auto Industry Varies; engineering; assembly; partsExpanding Industries positiveHigh Technology, Financial, Health Sectors
positive
Prime Farmland positive (potential bubble)Alternative Energy (Wind Turbines) strong positiveHigh Educational Attainment strong positive
Local Government Finances not Broken, but Few local governments have resources to satisfy
most, let alone all service demands No ready solution to accrued legacy costs Property tax caps slow revenue growth Growing reliance on sales tax, property tax
revenues State expects locals to solve their own problems*
*state will provide advice, financial oversight in severe cases
Prognostications
Better times ahead, if… State economy diversifies, reduces
reliance on old style manufacturing Improve education attainment of
younger workers Greater presence of expanding,
knowledge-based industries Agriculture remains strong Attract educated, wealthier immigrants Improved entrepreneurship climate
Prognostications
Better times ahead, if… Natural resources increase in demand
Invest in infrastructure, education Place making strategies Regional cooperation for economic development
Prognostications Detroit will drift in and out of financial
distress, unless… The governance culture permanently
changes The neighborhoods are made whole The education system is made functional The state and federal government
partners on infrastructure, adult education, workforce development, economic development
Prognostications
Many older, poorer urban communities will either struggle or die… Pockets of poverty and property
abandonment Eventual rebuilding driven by cheap
land prices Consolidation with surrounding
communities
Prognostications
Growth primarily in metro areas Urban centers can thrive in New
Economy with place making strategies Suburbs will slow historical rate of
growth Rural communities will continue to
lose population Residential will coalesce around small
towns