the global - wto.org€¦ · ppt file · web viewexchange rates and trade mr. heiner flassbeck...

27
Exchange Rates and Trade Mr. Heiner Flassbeck Director, Division on Globalization and Development Strategies, UNCTAD Geneva, 28th March 2012

Upload: phammien

Post on 30-Nov-2018

218 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Exchange Rates and Trade

Mr. Heiner FlassbeckDirector, Division on Globalization and Development Strategies,

UNCTAD

Geneva, 28th March 2012

2

Exchange rates have become disconnected from macroeconomic fundamentals

Real effective exchange rate, selected countries, 2000–2011(Index numbers, 2005 = 100, CPI based), source: IMF

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

Japan

China

United States

Germany

Brazil

Exchange rates have become disconnected from macroeconomic

fundamentalsReal effective exchange rate, selected countries, 2001–2010 (Index numbers, 2005 = 100, ULC based), source: UNCTAD Secretariat calculation based on

Economist Intelligence Unit and OECD for ULC data

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

JapanUnited States

Brazil

China

Germany

Carry trade vis-à-vis Japanese Yen, 2005-2012 (Per cent)

Source: UNCTAD secretariat calculations, based on IMF, International Financial Statistics database; and national sources. Note:A positive change in the exchange rate indicates an appreciation of the currency concerned. Interest rate differential is calculated considering difference between selected currencies and the yen-denominated asset. Monthly data.

Brazil

-25.00

-20.00

-15.00

-10.00

-5.00

0.00

5.00

10.00

15.00

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

Uncovered interest return Nominal exchange rate change Interest rate differential

Carry trade vis-à-vis Japanese Yen, 2005-2012 (Per cent)

Source: UNCTAD secretariat calculations, based on IMF, International Financial Statistics database; and national sources. Note: A positive change in the exchange rate indicates an appreciation of the currency concerned. Interest rate differential is calculated considering difference between selected currencies and the yen-denominated asset. Monthly data.

Iceland

-30.00

-25.00

-20.00

-15.00

-10.00

-5.00

0.00

5.00

10.00

15.00

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

Uncovered interest return Nominal exchange rate change Interest rate differential

Carry trade vis-à-vis Japanese Yen, 2005-2012 (Per cent)

Source: UNCTAD secretariat calculations, based on IMF, International Financial Statistics database; and national sources. Note:A positive change in the exchange rate indicates an appreciation of the currency concerned. Interest rate differential is calculated considering difference between selected currencies and the yen-denominated asset. Monthly data.

Australia

-25.00

-20.00

-15.00

-10.00

-5.00

0.00

5.00

10.00

15.00

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

Uncovered interest return Nominal exchange rate change Interest rate differential

International reserves and net portfolio investment, 2005-

2011

Source: Unctad Secretariat calculations, based on IMF, International Financial Statistics database. Note: Total reserves correspond to total reserves minus Gold and an increase in reserves corresponds capital outflows. Quarterly data.

Brazil

-36000

-26000

-16000

-6000

4000

14000

24000

34000

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

Mill

ions

USD

Total Reserves minus gold Portfolio Investment Net

General pattern for exchange rate adjustment

Deviations of nominal effective exchange rate from effective purchasing power parity, Brazil,1995-2010 (2000 = 100), source: UNCTAD Secretariat

50

70

90

110

130

150

170

190

1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

Crisis Brazil NEER Brazil EPPP

Trade balance swing from deficit in 1998 to surplus in

2002

General pattern for exchange rate adjustment

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

Crisis Argentina NEER Argentina EPPP

Trade balance swing from deficit in

1999 to surplus in 2002

Deviations of nominal effective exchange rate from effective purchasing power parity, Argentina,1991-2010 (2005 = 100), source: UNCTAD Secretariat

General pattern for exchange rate adjustment

Deviations of nominal effective exchange rate from effective purchasing power parity, China,1987-2010 (2000 = 100), source: UNCTAD Secretariat

50

70

90

110

130

150

170

190

1987

1988

1989

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

Crisis China NEER China EPPP

Trade balance swings from deficits in 1989 and in 1993

to surpluses in 1991 and 1995

General pattern for exchange rate adjustment

Deviations of nominal effective exchange rate from effective purchasing power parity, Republic of Korea,1984-2010 (2000 = 100), source: UNCTAD Secretariat

50

70

90

110

130

150

170

190

1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

Crisis Korea NEER Korea EPPP

Trade balance swings from deficits in 1996 and in 2008

to surpluses in 1998 and 2009

General pattern for exchange rate adjustment

Deviations of nominal effective exchange rate from effective purchasing power parity, Thailand,1980-2010 (2000 = 100), source: UNCTAD Secretariat

50

70

90

110

130

150

170

190

Crisis Thailand NEER Thailand EPPP

Trade balance swings from deficits in 1984 and in 1996

to surpluses in 1986 and 1998

Exchange Rates and Trade

Thank you

General pattern for exchange rate adjustment

Deviations of nominal effective exchange rate from effective purchasing power parity, Malaysia,1980-2010 (2000 = 100), source: UNCTAD Secretariat

50

70

90

110

130

150

170

190

Crisis Malaysia NEER Malaysia EPPP

Trade balance swings from deficits in 1983 and in 1996 to surpluses in 1986 and in 1998

General pattern for exchange rate adjustment

Deviations of nominal effective exchange rate from effective purchasing power parity, Iceland,1989-2010 (2000 = 100), source: UNCTAD Secretariat

50

70

90

110

130

150

170

190

1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

Crisis Iceland EPP Iceland NEER

Trade balance swings from deficits in 2000 and in 2007 to surpluses in 2001 and in 2009

General pattern for exchange rate adjustment

Deviations of nominal effective exchange rate from effective purchasing power parity, Sweden,1980-2010 (2000 = 100), source: UNCTAD Secretariat

50

70

90

110

130

150

170

190

Crisis Sweden NEER Sweden EPPP

Trade balance swings from deficits in 1980 and in 1992 to surpluses in 1984 and in 1994

General pattern for exchange rate adjustment

Deviations of nominal effective exchange rate from effective purchasing power parity, Italy,1984-2010 (2005 = 100), source: UNCTAD Secretariat

50

70

90

110

130

150

170

190

Crisis Italy NEER Italy EPPP

Trade balance swing from deficit in 1991 to surplus in 1993

General pattern for exchange rate adjustment

Deviations of nominal effective exchange rate from effective purchasing power parity, Hungary,1995-2010 (2000 = 100), source: UNCTAD Secretariat

50

70

90

110

130

150

170

190

1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

Crisis Hungary NEER Hungary EPPP

Trade balance swing from deficit in 2008 to surplus in

2009

General pattern for exchange rate adjustment

Deviations of nominal effective exchange rate from effective purchasing power parity, South Africa,1995-2010 (2000 = 100), source: UNCTAD Secretariat

50

70

90

110

130

150

170

190

1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Crisis South Africa NEER South Africa EPPP

Trade deficit reduction of about 30% from 2006 to 2008

General pattern for exchange rate adjustment: undervalued

currencies

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

Germany NEER Germany EPPP

Deviations of nominal effective exchange rate from effective purchasing power parity, Germany,1980-2010 (2000 = 100), source: UNCTAD Secretariat

General pattern for exchange rate adjustment: undervalued

currencies

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

United Kingdom NEER United Kingdom EPPP

Deviations of nominal effective exchange rate from effective purchasing power parity, United Kingdom,1980-2010 (2000 = 100), source: UNCTAD Secretariat

General pattern for exchange rate adjustment: undervalued

currencies

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

Switzerland Neer Switzerland EPPP

Deviations of nominal effective exchange rate from effective purchasing power parity, Switzerland,1980-2010 (2000 = 100), source: UNCTAD Secretariat

General pattern for exchange rate adjustment: undervalued

currencies

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

Canada NEER Canada EPPP

Deviations of nominal effective exchange rate from effective purchasing power parity, Canada,1980-2010 (2005 = 100), source: UNCTAD Secretariat

General pattern for exchange rate adjustment: undervalued

currencies

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

United States NEER United States EPPP

Deviations of nominal effective exchange rate from effective purchasing power parity, United States,1980-2010 (2000 = 100), source: UNCTAD Secretariat

General pattern for exchange rate adjustment: undervalued

currencies

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

Japan NEER Japan EPPP

Deviations of nominal effective exchange rate from effective purchasing power parity, Japan,1980-2010 (2000 = 100), source: UNCTAD Secretariat

General pattern for exchange rate adjustment: undervalued

currencies

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

Australia NEER Australia EPPP

Deviations of nominal effective exchange rate from effective purchasing power parity, Australia,1980-2010 (2005 = 100), source: UNCTAD Secretariat

General pattern for exchange rate adjustment: undervalued

currencies

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

New Zealand NEER New Zealand EPPP

Deviations of nominal effective exchange rate from effective purchasing power parity, New Zealand,1980-2010 (2005 = 100), source: UNCTAD Secretariat