the future of the eu budget – own resources péter benő banai deputy head of department ministry...
TRANSCRIPT
The future of the EU budget – own resources
Péter Benő BANAIdeputy head of department
Ministry of Finance, Hungary
Budapest, 30 May 2008.
Member States?
Payments at national level (e.g. the GNI-based contribution)
Citizens?
Payments at individual level (e.g. an EU-tax)
What are the basic economic and social entities, units of the Union?
The budget should „match” with the level of integration
No EU tax
The budget might be a tool to deepen integration
Introduction of an EU tax
What is the connection between the „depth of integration” and the budget?
• Sufficiency, Stability• Cost-effectiveness• Fairness• Financial autonomy• Visibility• …
There is not an own resource which fulfills all criteria.
There is a trade-off between different criteria.Weighting criteria determines the own resource system.
Which criteria shall be fulfilled by an optimal own resource?
• Visibility• Financial autonomy
National authorities should collect the tax! „Dependence” cannot be decreased.
Consumption structures are different in the Member States!
Fairness (?) Cost effectiveness
Stability
Two possible advantages of an EU tax compared to the GNI resource
Is it a good tool to present the Union?Just in principle!
According to the principle of universality budget revenue is used without distinction to finance all expenditure.
No „real” agreement on the expenditure sideNet positions dominating the agenda
Maintenance / introduction of a correction mechanism
No „real” agreement on the income side
No one is satisfied with the financial perspective
Do we need any correction systems?
The attitude of Member States towards debated issues of the or. system (1)
+ - ?
GNI-based contribution ? + + + + + + + + + + + - + - + + + should be
strengthened
good source of income,
but strengthens
the juste retour logic
needs further examination/neutral/not mentioned
VAT-based contribution - - + - - - - - - + ? - ? - - - - - should be
maintainedshould be abolished
needs further examination/neutral/not mentioned
Correction mechanisms - - - - - - + - - - ? - - + - - - -
should be maintained until present
resource system is kept
should be abolished
needs further examination/neutral/not mentioned
Implementa-tion of an EU
tax? - - ? + ? - ? + + ? - + - + ? ? - theoretically
favourablenot
favourable
needs further examination/neutral/not mentioned
ExplanationDKBUAT SKROPTPLNLLU
Country / issue
LTLVITHUELGEFRFIES
Note: the nine countries not included in the table have not yet submitted their contribution Based on the contribution of Member States’ governments to the public consultation process on the EU budget
The attitude of Member States towards debated issues of the or. system (2)
General consensus emerged on the following:
• Most countries emphasized the necessity to reform the current OR system.
• The reform should be closely linked to the expenditure side.
• The GNI-based resource satisfies the requirements of stability, flexibility, and equality.
Based on the contribution of Member States’ governments to the public consultation process on the EU budget
Thank you for your attention!
Péter Benő BANAIMinistry of Finance, HungaryTel: +36-1-327-2761Fax: +36-1-327-5949E-mail: [email protected]