the future of high capacity carbon fiber...
TRANSCRIPT
The Future of High Capacity Carbon Fiber Production
Presenter: James Fry Applications Engineer, Harper International
Introduction
1
Challenge: Carbon fiber applications for ground transportation exert market pressure towards
increased capacity and lower cost.
How can our industry meet the demand?
Agenda
• About Harper
• Automotive Materials Usage
• Current Carbon Fiber Production Lines
• 10,000 Tons Per Year Carbon Fiber Lines
• Space Requirements
• Energy Consumption
• Technical Challenges
2
Headquartered outside of Buffalo, NY
An Employee-Owned Company
Onsite Technology Center
Multi-disciplined engineering talent
– Chemical
– Ceramic
– Mechanical
– Electrical
– Industrial
– Process & Integration
3
About Harper
-> Established Leader in Thermal Processing Systems
-> Key Partner in Advanced Materials Scale Up
Primary Technical Focus:
New / Challenging / Advanced Material Processing
– 200°C 3000°C
– Batch and Continuous processing
– Precise atmospheric controls
– High purity requirements
– Complex gas-solid interactions
4
About Harper
Harper Pilot Line at Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Technology Focus
5
Applications: •Sintering •Drying •Calcination •Reduction •Controlled oxidation •Carbonization •Carburization
Materials: •Fibers & Filaments •Metal Oxides & Powders •Technical Ceramics •Energy Materials •Nano Materials •Rare Earths •Graphene
•Solid-solid reaction •Gas-solid reaction •Purification •Metalizing •Debinding •Parts processing •Phase transformation
Thermal Processing Systems Custom Advanced Systems for High Temperature Processing
6
Design Expertise: •Rotary Tube •Pusher Tunnel •Belt Conveyor •Vertical •Slot •Elevator
Range of Sizes: •Research Scale •Piloting Systems •Full Scale Production
Comprehensive Solutions: •Material Handling •Waste Gas Treatment •Control Systems
Agenda
7
• About Harper
• Automotive Materials Usage
• Current Carbon Fiber Production Lines
• 10,000 Tons Per Year Carbon Fiber Lines
• Space Requirements
• Energy Consumption
• Technical Challenges
-
20,000
40,000
60,000
80,000
100,000
120,000
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
ton
ne
s
Worldwide Nominal PAN CF Capacity
96,300
Historical PAN-based Carbon Fiber Supply
8
Source: Growth Opportunities in the Global Carbon Fiber Market 2011-2016, Lucintel, 2011
Global Carbon Fiber Capacity vs Automotive Material Demand
9
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Carbon Fiber - Global CF Capacity
Tho
usa
nd
s o
f To
nn
es
Material Comparisons
Global Carbon Fiber Capacity vs Automotive Material Demand
10
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
Carbon Fiber - Global CF Capacity Aluminum - Global Automotive IndustryConsumption
Tho
usa
nd
s o
f To
nn
es
Material Comparisons
Source: http://www.aluminiumleader.com/economics/world_market/
Global Carbon Fiber Capacity vs Automotive Material Demand
11
0
10000
20000
30000
40000
50000
60000
70000
80000
90000
Carbon Fiber - Global CF Capacity Aluminum - Global Automotive IndustryConsumption
Steel - Global Automotive IndustryConsumption
Tho
usa
nd
s o
f To
nn
es
Material Comparisons
Source: https://www.worldsteel.org/Steel-markets/Automotive.html/
The Drive For Efficiency
12
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030
Man
dat
ed
Fu
el E
con
om
y (m
pg)
USA Corporate Average Fuel Economy Mandates
1975-2025
All Cars 1978-2011
Small Cars 2011-2025
Big Cars 2012-2025
Source: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, http://www.nhtsa.gov/fuel-economy
The Drive For Efficiency
13
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030
Man
dat
ed
Fu
el E
con
om
y (m
pg)
USA Corporate Average Fuel Economy Mandates
1975-2025
All Cars 1978-2011
Small Cars 2011-2025
Big Cars 2012-2025
Actuals
Source: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, http://www.nhtsa.gov/fuel-economy
The Drive For Efficiency
14
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030
Alu
min
um
(kg
/ve
hic
le)
Man
dat
ed
Fu
el E
con
om
y (m
pg)
USA Corporate Average Fuel Economy Mandates
1975-2025
All Cars 1978-2011
Small Cars 2011-2025
Big Cars 2012-2025
Actuals
Aluminum Per Vehicle
Source: 2015 North American Light Vehicle Aluminum Content Study, Ducker Worldwide, 2014
Example C7 (2014+) Corvette Stingray
Every roof and hood CFRP
8.2kg CF per Coupe
37,288 Vehicles (71% Coupes)
~261 tons CF
15
Image © General Motors
2014 General Motors
• 6.03 Million Vehicles
49,000 Tons CF
2014 Ford
• 6.3 Million Vehicles
51,000 Tons CF
2014 Volkswagen AG
• 10.1 Million Vehicles
82,000 Tons CF
2014 Global Industry
• 87.9 Million Vehicles
718,000 Tons CF
What If
Carbon Fiber
Sources: plasancarbon.com; corvetteblogger.com; GM, Ford, and VW Annual Reports
Agenda
16
• About Harper
• Automotive Materials Usage
• Current Carbon Fiber Production Lines
• 10,000 Tons Per Year Carbon Fiber Lines
• Space Requirements
• Energy Consumption
• Technical Challenges
Carbon Fiber Current Production Lines
17
1500 to 2500 Tons Per Year
3 Meter Processing Width
3 Meter Wide Harper Oxidation Oven Section
Current Production Lines Floor Space Requirements
Up to 300 meters long
18
DRIVES 4&5PRECURSOR
MOISTENING
DRIVE 1
VENT TO RTO (VE)
MAKE-UP AIR (MA)
THERMAL OXIDIZER
CREEL STATION OXIDATION OVEN STACK 1 DRIVE 7DRIVE 6DRIVES 2&3OXIDATION OVEN STACK 2 OXIDATION OVEN STACK 3
DRIVE 9DRIVE 8 ONLINE WINDING SURFACE TREATMENT SYSTEMHT FURNACE SYSTEMLT FURNACE SYSTEM
Harper Estimated Cost Structure
19
Cost of Manufacturing (CF) Based on 1500 TPY 12k (90min, 90s, 90s RT)
Equipment Depriciation
12%Facility
Depreciation12%
Electricity5%
Natural Gas6%Nitrogen
2%
Labor12%
Precursor51%
Cost of Manufacturing (CF)Based on 1500 TPY 12k (90min, 90s, 90s RT)
• Energy ~10% of total • Oxidation = 30-40%
• ~6 MW total consumption • $4MM USD per year (energy)
Depreciation
Agenda
20
• About Harper
• Automotive Materials Usage
• Current Carbon Fiber Production Lines
• 10,000 Tons Per Year Carbon Fiber Lines
• Space Requirements
• Energy Consumption
• Technical Challenges
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
10000
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
An
nu
al C
apac
ity
(mto
n/y
ear
)
Line Width (meters)
Carbonization Line Productivity
2000 f/mm 10m/min
2500 f/mm 10 m/min
3000 f/mm 10 m/min
2000 f/mm 15 m/min
2500 f/mm 15 m/min
3000 f/mm 15 m/min
2000 f/mm 20 m/min
2500 f/mm 20 m/min
3000 f/mm 20 m/min
Step Change From 2,500 to 10,000
21
Today vs Tomorrow
22
Production 2,500 TPY 10,000 TPY
Filament Density
2500 f/mm 3000 f/mm
Line Width 3 Meters 5 Meters
Line Speed 10 m/min 20 m/min
Tow Type Tow Spacing
(mm) Number of
Tows Tow Spacing
(mm) Number of
Tows
12k 4.6 650 3.8 1300
24k 9.2 325 7.6 650
48k 18.4 162 15.2 325
3.8 1300
**Dual Tow Bands May Be Necessary
Dual Tow Bands
23
Parallel Oxidation Shared Carbonization
Single Plant
• Shared Controls
• Common Utilities
• Common Creels / Winders
• Etc
Floor Space as a Function of Line Configuration
24
200
220
240
260
280
300
320
340
360
380
400
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000
Cre
el-
to-W
ind
ers
In
clu
sive
Le
ngt
h (
m)
Line Capacity (mton/year)
3 m, 12K, 1500 f/mm
3 m, 12K, 2500 f/mm
3m, 24K, 3500 f/mm
4 m, 12K, 1500 f/mm
4 m, 12K, 2500 f/mm
4 m, 24K, 3500 f/mm
5 m, 12K, 2500 f/mm
5 m, 24K, 3500 f/mm
5 Meters Wide
Residence Times 60/60/60
(Minutes Oxidation / Seconds LT, Seconds HT)
325 Tows Pitched 15.2mm Apart, Single Band
20 m/min Line Speed
10,000 Tons Per Year Line 48k Tow
25
Oxidation
3 Stacks, 15 Passes per Stack
26m Pass Length
1170m Total Heated Length
Carbonization, Each Furnace
10 Zones
20m Heated Length
DRIVES 4&5PRECURSOR
MOISTENING
DRIVE 1
VENT TO RTO (VE)
MAKE-UP AIR (MA)
THERMAL OXIDIZER
CREEL STATION OXIDATION OVEN STACK 1 DRIVE 7DRIVE 6DRIVES 2&3OXIDATION OVEN STACK 2 OXIDATION OVEN STACK 3
DRIVE 9DRIVE 8 ONLINE WINDING SURFACE TREATMENT SYSTEMHT FURNACE SYSTEMLT FURNACE SYSTEM
~310 meters long
10,000 Tons Per Year Line Energy Consumption
26
16.7 Megawatts!
1500 TPY, 6MW = 30 kw/kg
10,000 TPY, 16.7MW = 12.5 kw/kg
9735
1320
2244
1933
1483
Power Consumption 10,000 Tons Per Year Single CF Line
Ovens
LT
HT
Abatement
Auxiliary
Technical Challenges
27
For Faster Speed & Greater Precision…
Better Process Stability
Oxidation Oven Stability
“Focus on the Bottleneck”
Today Tomorrow Increase
2,500 TPY 10,000 TPY 400%
3 meters wide 5 meters wide 167%
10 m/min 20 m/min 200%
2,500 filaments/mm 3,000 filaments/mm 120%
PAN Oxidation
28
“Like toasting a marshmallow on a camp fire.”
-Dr. Renee Bagwell
• Achieve uniform thermal processing
• Prevent runaway exotherm
• Key: airflow uniformity
Straight
Smooth
Even
29
Tow Processing Volume
Inlet Nozzle Collector Plenum
Flow Just Downstream of Heater
Fan Inlet
Tow Processing Volume
Harper Oxidation Oven Flow Pattern
Oxidation Unstable Airflow
30
Tow Processing Volume
Inlet Nozzle Collector Plenum
Flow Just Downstream of Heater
Fan Inlet
Tow Processing Volume
Harper Oxidation Oven Stable Airflow
31
Inlet Nozzle Collector Plenum
Tow Processing Volume
Flow Just Downstream of Heater
Fan Inlet
Harper Oxidation Oven - Stable Data
32
Harper Oxidation Oven Safety Features
33
448kg PAN in Each Zone
=878,000 kJ Energy
=25 Liters Gasoline
Water Injection Deflagration Management
Furnaces Length OK
• Harper Has Furnaces >18m in Operation
Width is Challenging
• Multiple Vent Ports?
• Dual Muffles?
34
Harper LT : ~5.2 meter wide tow system in final assembly, Two (2) muffles 2.6 meter each
Conclusions
Adoption of CFRP as an automotive material will force rethinking of plant configuration.
35
0
20000
40000
60000
80000
100000
Carbon Fiber -Global CF Capacity
Aluminum - GlobalAutomotive
IndustryConsumption
Steel - GlobalAutomotive
IndustryConsumption
Tou
san
ds
of
Ton
ne
s
Material Comparisons
Significant cost savings will be realized.
16.7 Megawatts!
1500 TPY, 6MW = 30 kw/kg
10,000 PTY, 19.2MW =
Precision equipment will be paramount to success.
12.5 kw/kg
Thank You!
Visit us at harperintl.com or stop by booth Hall 6, Booth C56
36