the federal-state framework

13
EPA’S DRAFT GUIDELINES TO STATES FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF STATE 111(d) PLANS MIDWESTERN POWER SECTOR COLLABORATIVE JUNE 17, 2014 FRANZ LITZ PROGRAM CONSULTANT

Upload: flint

Post on 11-Jan-2016

29 views

Category:

Documents


5 download

DESCRIPTION

EPA’s draft guidelines to states for the development of state 111( d ) PLANS Midwestern power sector collaborative June 17, 2014 Franz Litz PROGRAM CONSULTANT. The Federal-State Framework. EPA issues standards for new sources (under §111(b) of the Clean Air Act) EPA’s guidelines under 111(d) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: The Federal-State Framework

EPA’S DRAFT GUIDELINES TO STATES FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF STATE 111(d) PLANS

MIDWESTERN POWER SECTOR COLLABORATIVEJUNE 17, 2014

FRANZ LITZPROGRAM CONSULTANT

Page 2: The Federal-State Framework

The Federal-State Framework• EPA issues standards for new sources

(under §111(b) of the Clean Air Act)• EPA’s guidelines under 111(d)• State 111(d) plans:

– Single state plans; or– Regional plans

• If state fails to submit plan, or the plan is inadequate, EPA must impose federal plan

2

Page 3: The Federal-State Framework

Summary of EPA 111(d) Guidelines• Dubbed EPA’s “Clean Power Plan”• Sets minimum stringency for a state—called “state

goals” that apply in aggregate to the state’s “affected” electric generating units

• Establishes a compliance time period of ten years, with an interim target to apply on average between 2020 and 2029, and a final target in 2030

• Guidelines give states very broad flexibility to achieve state goals through any “efficacious means”

3

Page 4: The Federal-State Framework

4

Source: Bloomberg New Energy Finance

State Goals as Tons Reduced from 2012

Page 5: The Federal-State Framework

State Goals as % Reduction from 2012

5

Source: Bloomberg New Energy Finance

Page 6: The Federal-State Framework

“Adjusted Output-Weighted Average CO2 Emission Rates”

TOTAL CO2 EMISSIONSfrom Coal-, Oil- & Gas-fired Steam,

Natural Gas Combined Cycle & “Other” Units (Affected EGUs)

TOTAL NET ENERGY OUTPUTFrom Affected EGUs

+ Renewables + New Nuclear + 6% at-risk nuclear + cumulative annual EE savings

Lbs

MWh

Page 7: The Federal-State Framework

Heat Rate Improvements at Coal Plants6% through both O&M and plant upgrades

Increased Utilization of Existing Natural Gas PlantsDial up existing NGCC to 70% capacity factor

Increased Utilization of Zero Carbon Resources,Including Nuclear and Renewables

Operate New Nuclear Plants, Preserve the 6% of Existing Nuclear capacity that EIA projects would retire; & Achieve renewables generation consistent with average regional

renewables target

Achieve 1.5% Energy Savings through End-Use Energy Efficiency

Starting where a state is, increase energy savings at a rate of 0.2% per year until state reaches 1.5%

BUILDING BLOCKS

Page 8: The Federal-State Framework

Heat Rate Improvements at Coal Plants

Increased Utilization of Existing Natural Gas Plants

Increased Utilization of Zero Carbon Resources,Including Nuclear and Renewables

Achieve 1.5% Energy Savings through End-Use Energy Efficiency

OTHER “BUILDING BLOCKS”

Co-firing lower carbon fuels

Retirements

New Natural Gas Plants

Distributed Generation, Combined Heat and Power

Carbon capture & storage (e.g. EOR-related)

Gains from Trade/Regional Compliance

Page 9: The Federal-State Framework

State Approaches in 111(d) Plans• Work with rate-based goal or

convert rate to mass-based goal;• Broad flexibility in the approach taken

by states• EPA says flexibility allows states to

recognize “remaining useful life”

9

Page 10: The Federal-State Framework

Direct vs. “Portfolio” Measures• Direct emissions limits apply to

affected units.• “Portfolio” measures are enforceable

obligations on a 3rd party—either a private or govt. entity that is not the owner/operator of affected units; they present enforcement issues

10

Page 11: The Federal-State Framework

Rulemaking Timeline

• Draft guideline published in Federal Register (6-18-2014)

• 120-day Public Comment Period (≈10-16-2014)

• Final Rule June 2015

Page 12: The Federal-State Framework

Required Elements in State PlanFrom the Preamble (p.117):1. Enforceable measures that reduce EGU CO2 emissions;

2. Projected achievement of emission performance equivalent to goals established by the EPA, on a timeline equivalent to that in the emission guidelines;

3. Quantifiable and verifiable emission reductions;4. A process for reporting on plan implementation,

progress toward achieving CO2 goals, and implementation of corrective actions, if necessary.

Page 13: The Federal-State Framework

State Planning Timeline

• Final Rule June 2015• State plan timing:

– Initial state submittal in June 2016– One-year extension possible for adopting single-

state plans – Two-year extension possible for adopting regional

plans• Programs go into effect upon adoption of

state plans, unless superseded by federal plan