the federal r&d budget: process and perspectives matt hourihan april 10, 2014 for george...

25
The Federal R&D Budget: Process and Perspectives Matt Hourihan April 10, 2014 For George Washington University IAFF 2190W: Science, Technology & Policy AAAS R&D Budget and Policy Program http://www.aaas.org/spp/rd

Upload: johnathon-becraft

Post on 30-Mar-2015

216 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: The Federal R&D Budget: Process and Perspectives Matt Hourihan April 10, 2014 For George Washington University IAFF 2190W: Science, Technology & Policy

The Federal R&D Budget: Process and Perspectives

Matt HourihanApril 10, 2014For George Washington University IAFF 2190W: Science, Technology & Policy

AAAS R&D Budget and Policy Programhttp://www.aaas.org/spp/rd

Page 2: The Federal R&D Budget: Process and Perspectives Matt Hourihan April 10, 2014 For George Washington University IAFF 2190W: Science, Technology & Policy

The Federal Budget is Kind Of a Big Deal

“Politics is who gets what, when, and how.” Put another way: budgeting is a manifestation of politics The Budget is also a roadmap

The primary way Congress directs U.S. policy Major impact for R&D and innovation: most basic

research, and most university research, is federally funded

Page 3: The Federal R&D Budget: Process and Perspectives Matt Hourihan April 10, 2014 For George Washington University IAFF 2190W: Science, Technology & Policy
Page 4: The Federal R&D Budget: Process and Perspectives Matt Hourihan April 10, 2014 For George Washington University IAFF 2190W: Science, Technology & Policy

Two Spending Categories: Discretionary vs. Mandatory

Mandatory Spending (aka Direct Spending) Mostly entitlements, mostly on “autopilot” Potential for high political sensitivity = “third rail”

Discretionary Spending: Adjusted annually Easy (nondefense) targets?

i.e. Sequestration Vast majority of federal R&D is discretionary

Page 5: The Federal R&D Budget: Process and Perspectives Matt Hourihan April 10, 2014 For George Washington University IAFF 2190W: Science, Technology & Policy
Page 6: The Federal R&D Budget: Process and Perspectives Matt Hourihan April 10, 2014 For George Washington University IAFF 2190W: Science, Technology & Policy
Page 7: The Federal R&D Budget: Process and Perspectives Matt Hourihan April 10, 2014 For George Washington University IAFF 2190W: Science, Technology & Policy

A Typical Federal Budget Process:Three Years, Four Phases

Phase 4: Execute the fiscal year’s budget (not shown)

Arranged by fiscal year (October to September)B

udge

t R

elea

se

Oct Nov Dec J an Feb Mar Apr May J un J ul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec J an Feb Mar Apr May J un J ul Aug Sep

Phase 1: Planning within Agency w/ OMB and OSTP oversight

Phase 2: OMB Review

Phase 3: Congressional budget and appropriations

Page 8: The Federal R&D Budget: Process and Perspectives Matt Hourihan April 10, 2014 For George Washington University IAFF 2190W: Science, Technology & Policy

Bud

get

Rel

ease

Oct Nov Dec J an Feb Mar Apr May J un J ul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec J an Feb Mar Apr May J un J ul Aug Sep

Phase 1: Planning within Agency w/ OMB and OSTP oversight

Phase 2: OMB Review

Phase 3: Congressional budget and appropriations

The Federal Budget Cycle

Phase 1: Internal agency discussions and planning Strategic plans, staff retreats, stakeholder meetings, program

assessments

OMB is present throughout Early spring: guidance memo Science & Tech: Joint guidance memo from OMB / OSTP (midsummer)

Agencies deliver budget justifications to OMB (early fall)

Page 9: The Federal R&D Budget: Process and Perspectives Matt Hourihan April 10, 2014 For George Washington University IAFF 2190W: Science, Technology & Policy

What Drives Presidential R&D Budget Formulation?

Top-down and bottom-up priorities and politics OMB oversight and OSTP

input

Expert and community input

Congressional legislation Big (fiscal) picture Incrementalism

Page 10: The Federal R&D Budget: Process and Perspectives Matt Hourihan April 10, 2014 For George Washington University IAFF 2190W: Science, Technology & Policy

Science + Politics Mingle: One Example

Human Genome Project Community takes first interest in

mapping/sequencing DOE labs take early gov’t interest and lead

Radiation and computing power DOE labs officials convince dept. managers and

advisory groups, OMB, Appropriators NIH sets up its own program

Interagency rivalry evolves to collaborationCongress eventually creates NHGRI

Page 11: The Federal R&D Budget: Process and Perspectives Matt Hourihan April 10, 2014 For George Washington University IAFF 2190W: Science, Technology & Policy

Bud

get

Rel

ease

Oct Nov Dec J an Feb Mar Apr May J un J ul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec J an Feb Mar Apr May J un J ul Aug Sep

Phase 1: Planning within Agency w/ OMB and OSTP oversight

Phase 2: OMB Review

Phase 3: Congressional budget and appropriations

The Federal Budget Cycle

Phase 2: OMB performs multi-stage review, responds to agencies (“passbacks”) Agencies and agency heads can and do negotiate

Budget proposals are finalized in January President presents the proposed budget to Congress early

February

Page 12: The Federal R&D Budget: Process and Perspectives Matt Hourihan April 10, 2014 For George Washington University IAFF 2190W: Science, Technology & Policy
Page 13: The Federal R&D Budget: Process and Perspectives Matt Hourihan April 10, 2014 For George Washington University IAFF 2190W: Science, Technology & Policy

Administration R&D Priorities Department of Energy: NNSA, renewables and efficiency, ARPA-E Neuroscience NASA: industry partnerships Transportation: highways and high-performance rail Extramural ag research Advanced Manufacturing Environmental research?

COMPETES Agencies: $11 billion for R&D (+1% from FY14) Treading water Research budget hit?

(not really)

Page 14: The Federal R&D Budget: Process and Perspectives Matt Hourihan April 10, 2014 For George Washington University IAFF 2190W: Science, Technology & Policy

Bud

get

Rel

ease

Oct Nov Dec J an Feb Mar Apr May J un J ul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec J an Feb Mar Apr May J un J ul Aug Sep

Phase 1: Planning within Agency w/ OMB and OSTP oversight

Phase 2: OMB Review

Phase 3: Congressional budget and appropriations

The Federal Budget Cycle

Phase 3: Congress gets involved Receives and reacts to President’s budget, holds hearings IN THEORY: Approves budget resolution (simple

majority) 302(b) allocations to the 12 appropriations subcommittees

Page 15: The Federal R&D Budget: Process and Perspectives Matt Hourihan April 10, 2014 For George Washington University IAFF 2190W: Science, Technology & Policy

The Budget Resolution

Overall spending framework

Discretionary spending figure is divvied up by appropriations committees

Budget resolution is a political document (which is why they

can’t seem to pass one?)

Page 16: The Federal R&D Budget: Process and Perspectives Matt Hourihan April 10, 2014 For George Washington University IAFF 2190W: Science, Technology & Policy
Page 17: The Federal R&D Budget: Process and Perspectives Matt Hourihan April 10, 2014 For George Washington University IAFF 2190W: Science, Technology & Policy

Bud

get

Rel

ease

Oct Nov Dec J an Feb Mar Apr May J un J ul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec J an Feb Mar Apr May J un J ul Aug Sep

Phase 1: Planning within Agency w/ OMB and OSTP oversight

Phase 2: OMB Review

Phase 3: Congressional budget and appropriations

The Federal Budget Cycle

Approps committees write/approve 12 appropriations bills Bills have to pass both chambers Differences are resolved in conference committee Can be filibustered

“President proposes, Congress disposes”

Page 18: The Federal R&D Budget: Process and Perspectives Matt Hourihan April 10, 2014 For George Washington University IAFF 2190W: Science, Technology & Policy

What Drives Congressional Budget Decisions?

“All politics is local” Concerns over balance,

duplication, competitiveness, role of government

Expert and community input

Incrementalism? The Big Fiscal Context

“Annual Miracle”

Page 19: The Federal R&D Budget: Process and Perspectives Matt Hourihan April 10, 2014 For George Washington University IAFF 2190W: Science, Technology & Policy

More examples… Dept of Agriculture research grants

USDA research regular source for earmarks Outside calls for increased competitive grants

(versus formula funds) over 30+ years Competitive programs phased in slowly

Health Research and Congress DOD health program: breast cancer advocacy NIH doubling was a Congress-led initiative

Page 20: The Federal R&D Budget: Process and Perspectives Matt Hourihan April 10, 2014 For George Washington University IAFF 2190W: Science, Technology & Policy

Authorizations vs. Appropriations Authorization

Creates and modifies programs Sets funding ceilings Under the jurisdiction of the topical legislative committees

Appropriations Permits funding (power to incur obligations) Under jurisdiction of Approps Committees Can be multiyear or advance appropriations (i.e.

Veterans) >$250 million in unauthorized appropriations in 2012 (per

CBO)

Page 21: The Federal R&D Budget: Process and Perspectives Matt Hourihan April 10, 2014 For George Washington University IAFF 2190W: Science, Technology & Policy

House

BudgetCmte

Natural Resources

Cmte

Approps Cmte

Subc on Interior +

Env

Subc on Energy +

Water

Energy + Commerce

Cmte

Senate

BudgetCmte

Energy and Nat

Res Cmte

Env and Pub Works

Cmte

Approps Cmte

Subc on Energy +

Water

Subc on Interior +

Env

Page 22: The Federal R&D Budget: Process and Perspectives Matt Hourihan April 10, 2014 For George Washington University IAFF 2190W: Science, Technology & Policy

The Federal Budget Cycle

Gov’t is working on 3 budgets at any given time. Right now: Spending FY14 FY15 released, Congress getting involved Agencies / OMB already thinking about FY16

FY 2014

FY 2015

Bud

get

Rel

ease

FY 2016

Bud

get

Rel

ease

Oct Nov Dec J an Feb Mar Apr May J un J ul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec J an Feb Mar Apr May J un J ul Aug Sep

Phase 4: Spend the Fiscal Year Budget

Phase 2: OMB Review

Phase 3: Congressional budget and appropriations

Phase 1: Planning within Agency w/ OMB and OSTP oversight

Phase 4: Spend the Fiscal Year Budget

Phase 2: OMB Review

Phase 3: Congressional budget and appropriations

Page 23: The Federal R&D Budget: Process and Perspectives Matt Hourihan April 10, 2014 For George Washington University IAFF 2190W: Science, Technology & Policy

Looking ahead… Discretionary spending in FY

2015 has already been agreed 25% of sequester reductions

rolled back Budget resolution in the House Beyond FY 2015: back to

sequester levels

Big-picture fiscal challenges remain largely unchanged

Can R&D stay ahead of the curve?

Page 24: The Federal R&D Budget: Process and Perspectives Matt Hourihan April 10, 2014 For George Washington University IAFF 2190W: Science, Technology & Policy
Page 25: The Federal R&D Budget: Process and Perspectives Matt Hourihan April 10, 2014 For George Washington University IAFF 2190W: Science, Technology & Policy

For more info…

[email protected]

202-326-6607

www.aaas.org/spp/rd/