the evolution of social behavior: examining motivations for altruism john cuchural storia della...
TRANSCRIPT
The Evolution of Social Behavior: Examining Motivations for AltruismJohn CuchuralStoria della FilantropiaProfessoressa Giuliana GemelliJune 19th, 2012
The Human Condition Conscious thought is driven by emotion It is committed to the purposes of
survival and reproduction Why does social life exist at all? What is the identity of the driving
forces?
The Invention of Eusociality
Eusocial- group members containing multiple generations are prone to perform altruistic acts as part of their division of labor
Features of Eusociality A common, defensible nest where the
group is forced to interact with each other
Division of labor amongst the multigenerational group wherein all sacrifice at least some of their interests to the group
How Natural Selection Creates Social Instincts Behavioral traits, like physiological
traits, are hereditary Distinction between Unit and Target Unit- gene or arrangement of genes Target-combination of traits encoded by
units and favored/disfavored by the environment
Some targets acted on by group: communication, division of labor, dominance, and cooperation in performing communal tasks
Individual-versus-group selection results in a mix of altruism and selfishness
What benefits the group is quite often at odds at what benefits the individual
Human Eusociality Evaluation by members of group led to
difference between insects and humans This led to most successful strategies
becoming those mixing altruism, cooperation, competition, domination, reciprocity, defection, and decit
The Selfish Gene The selfish need for reproduction is
what drives all evolution Competition for mates and resources Drawbacks to out-and-out fighting Nobel acts as just a “smart” strategy to
survive
The War of the Sexes Mates share no DNA but have half
interest in offspring There is incentive to trick mate into
investing more Female’s best interest to refuse sex
before ample energy is invested into welfare of offspring
Males faithful, Females coy
Family Ties Based on Hamilton inequality family
altruism makes sense on a mathematical level
Bee stinging and dying to protect hive However there is a difference between
brother and child
Kin Selection Also known as inclusive-fitness theory States that the more closely related
members of a group are, the more likely they are to become an eusocial group
Altruism based of collateral gains of relatives at the cost of personal genetic fitness
Need for a New Theory of Eusociality Hamilton inequality: rb>c r defined as the fraction of genes shared
by altruist and recipient Argument with the looseness of the
definition of r Multilevel natural selection as a blanket
understanding instead
Wilson’s Steps of Eusocial Evolution Formation of groups Occurrence of preadaptive traits causing
groups to be tightly formed (nest-depend)
Appearance of mutations that prescribe the persistence of the group (knocking out dispersal behavior)
In insects development of workers Development of colony life into
superorganisms
The Origins of Morality and Honor Good and evil a product of multilevel
selection where group vs individual selection act in opposition to each other
Charity can be seen through lens of indirect reciprocity
Naturalistic understanding of morality and the ability to overcome instincts to create a more just world
Sources Seminar Overview: Darwin’s Medicine:
Evolutionary Psychology and its Applications,“Charity giving, philanthropy, and volunteering: Implications from evolutionary and social sciences,” Friday 29 May 2009, University of Kent
Wilson, Edward O. The Social Conquest of Earth. 1. New York, New York: Liveright Publishing Corporation, 2012.
Dawkins, Richard. The Selfish Gene. 30th anniversary. Oxford University Press, 2006.