the environment of star formation theory: low-mass versus high-mass stars

64
1) The environment of star formation 2) Theory: low-mass versus high-mass stars 3) The birthplaces of high-mass stars 4) Evolutionary scheme for high-mass stars 5) Conclusion: formation by accretion? High-mass stars from cradle to first steps: a possible evolutionary sequence (High-mass M * >10M L * >10 4 L B3-O)

Upload: zwi

Post on 14-Jan-2016

36 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

High-mass stars from cradle to first steps: a possible evolutionary sequence ( High-mass  M * >10M ⊙  L * >10 4 L ⊙  B3-O ). The environment of star formation Theory: low-mass versus high-mass stars The birthplaces of high-mass stars Evolutionary scheme for high-mass stars - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: The environment of star formation Theory:  low-mass  versus  high-mass  stars

1) The environment of star formation

2) Theory: low-mass versus high-mass stars

3) The birthplaces of high-mass stars

4) Evolutionary scheme for high-mass stars

5) Conclusion: formation by accretion?

High-mass stars from cradle to first steps: a possible evolutionary sequence

(High-mass M*>10M⊙ L*>104L⊙ B3-O)

Page 2: The environment of star formation Theory:  low-mass  versus  high-mass  stars

The environment of star formation

• Clouds: 10100 pc; 10 K; 10103 cm-3; Av=110; CO,13CO; nCO/nH2

=10-4

• Clumps: 1 pc; 50 K; 105 cm-3; AV=100; CS, C34S; nCS/nH2

=10-8

• Cores: 0.1 pc; 100 K; 107 cm-3; Av=1000; CH3CN, exotic species; nCH3CN/nH2

=10-10

• YSOs signposts: IRAS, masers, UC HIIs

Page 3: The environment of star formation Theory:  low-mass  versus  high-mass  stars

Low-mass VS High-mass

“Standard” (Shu’s) picture:Accretion onto protostarStatic envelope: nR-2

Infalling region: nR-3/2

Protostar: tKH=GM2/R*L*

Accretion: tacc=(dMacc/dt)/M*

– Low-mass stars: tKH > tacc

– High-mass stars: tKH < tacc

High-mass stars reach ZAMS still accreting

Page 4: The environment of star formation Theory:  low-mass  versus  high-mass  stars
Page 5: The environment of star formation Theory:  low-mass  versus  high-mass  stars

Low-mass VS High-mass

“Standard” (Shu’s) picture:Accretion onto protostarStatic envelope: nR-2

Infalling region: nR-3/2

Protostar: tKH=GM2/R*L*

Accretion: tacc=(dMacc/dt)/M*

– Low-mass stars: tKH > tacc

– High-mass stars: tKH < tacc

High-mass stars reach ZAMS still accreting

Page 6: The environment of star formation Theory:  low-mass  versus  high-mass  stars

Problem:Stellar winds + radiation pressure stop accretion at

M*=8 M⊙ how can M*>8 M⊙ form?

Solutions:i. Accretion with

dM/dt(High-M*)>>dM/dt(Low-M*)=10-5 M⊙/yii. Accretion through disks (+outflows)iii. Merging of many low-mass stars

Observations of the natal environment of high-mass stars are necessary to solve this problem!

Page 7: The environment of star formation Theory:  low-mass  versus  high-mass  stars

The search for high-mass YSOsHigh-mass YSOs deeply embedded observations more

difficult than for low-mass YSOs (e.g. S254/7 SFR)Observational problem: to find suitable tracer and target1) What to look for? High-density, high-temper. tracers

high-excitation lines, rare molecules, (sub)mm continuum

2) Where to search for? Young and massive targets:a) UC HIIs: OB stars are in clusters

b) H2O masers without free-free: luminous but without UC HII region

c) IRAS without H2O and UC HII: protostellar phase?

Page 8: The environment of star formation Theory:  low-mass  versus  high-mass  stars
Page 9: The environment of star formation Theory:  low-mass  versus  high-mass  stars

The search for high-mass YSOsHigh-mass YSOs deeply embedded observations more

difficult than for low-mass YSOs (e.g. S254/7 SFR)Observational problem: to find suitable tracer and target1) What to look for? High-density, high-temper. tracers

high-excitation lines, rare molecules, (sub)mm continuum

2) Where to search for? Young and massive targets:a) UC HIIs: OB stars are in clusters

b) H2O masers without free-free: luminous but without UC HII region

c) IRAS without H2O and UC HII: protostellar phase?

Page 10: The environment of star formation Theory:  low-mass  versus  high-mass  stars

Observations

High-mass YSOs: AV > 10 radioNIR needed

• Low angular resolution = single-dish = 10”2’ Effelsberg, Nobeyama, IRAM, JCMT, CSO, NRAO NH3, CO, 13CO, CS, C34S, CH3C2H, CN, HCO+, …

• High angular resolution = interferometers = 0.3”4” VLA, IRAM, Nobeyama, OVRO, BIMA, VLBI NH3, CH3CN, CH3OH, SiO, HCO+, H2O, continuum

Page 11: The environment of star formation Theory:  low-mass  versus  high-mass  stars

General results

Targets surrounded by dense, medium size clumps: 1 pc, 50 K, 105–106 cm-3, 103–104 M⊙

Dense, small cores found close to/around targets: 0.1 pc, >107 cm-3, 40–200 K, 10–103 M⊙

Page 12: The environment of star formation Theory:  low-mass  versus  high-mass  stars
Page 13: The environment of star formation Theory:  low-mass  versus  high-mass  stars

Clumps

Traced by all molecules observed real entities!

• Mclump>Mvirial large B (1mG) needed for equilibrium

• TK R-0.5 heated by source close to centre

• nH2 R-2.6 marginally stable

• dMacc/dt = Mclump/tAD = 10-3–10-2 M⊙/y large accretion rates

clumps may be marginally stable entities (∼105 y) accretion from clumps feeds embedded YSOs

Page 14: The environment of star formation Theory:  low-mass  versus  high-mass  stars

Clumps

Traced by all molecules observed real entities!

• Mclump>Mvirial large B (1mG) needed for equilibrium

• TK R-0.5 heated by source close to centre

• nH2 R-2.6 marginally stable

• dMacc/dt = Mclump/tAD = 10-3–10-2 M⊙/y large accretion rates

clumps may be marginally stable entities (∼105 y) accretion from clumps feeds embedded YSOs

Page 15: The environment of star formation Theory:  low-mass  versus  high-mass  stars
Page 16: The environment of star formation Theory:  low-mass  versus  high-mass  stars

Clumps

Traced by all molecules observed real entities!

• Mclump>Mvirial large B (1mG) needed for equilibrium

• TK R-0.5 heated by source close to centre

• nH2 R-2.6 marginally stable

• dMacc/dt = Mclump/tAD = 10-3–10-2 M⊙/y large accretion rates

clumps may be marginally stable entities (∼105 y) accretion from clumps feeds embedded YSOs

Page 17: The environment of star formation Theory:  low-mass  versus  high-mass  stars
Page 18: The environment of star formation Theory:  low-mass  versus  high-mass  stars

Clumps

Traced by all molecules observed real entities!

• Mclump>Mvirial large B (1mG) needed for equilibrium

• TK R-0.5 heated by source close to centre

• nH2 R-2.6 marginally stable

• dMacc/dt = Mclump/tAD = 10-3–10-2 M⊙/y large accretion rates

clumps may be marginally stable entities (∼105 y) accretion from clumps feeds embedded YSOs

Page 19: The environment of star formation Theory:  low-mass  versus  high-mass  stars
Page 20: The environment of star formation Theory:  low-mass  versus  high-mass  stars

Clumps

Traced by all molecules observed real entities!

• Mclump>Mvirial large B (1mG) needed for equilibrium

• TK R-0.5 heated by source close to centre

• nH2 R-2.6 marginally stable

• dMacc/dt = Mclump/tAD = 10-3–10-2 M⊙/y large accretion rates

clumps may be marginally stable entities (∼105 y) accretion from clumps feeds embedded YSOs

Page 21: The environment of star formation Theory:  low-mass  versus  high-mass  stars

Clumps

Traced by all molecules observed real entities!

• Mclump>Mvirial large B (1mG) needed for equilibrium

• TK R-0.5 heated by source close to centre

• nH2 R-2.6 marginally stable

• dMacc/dt = Mclump/tAD = 10-3–10-2 M⊙/y large accretion rates

clumps may be marginally stable entities (∼105 y) accretion from clumps feeds embedded YSOs

Page 22: The environment of star formation Theory:  low-mass  versus  high-mass  stars

Hot Cores (HCs)

Hot (100–200 K) cores often found close to UC HIIs:• H2O masers and high energy lines large nH2

and TK

• many rare molecules evaporation from dust grains• TK R-3/4 inner energy source• LIRAS 104 L ⊙ embedded OB star• a few HCs contain UC HIIs! OB stars• rotating circumstellar disks found in some HCs• molecular outflows from several HCs

HCs host young ZAMS high-mass stars

Page 23: The environment of star formation Theory:  low-mass  versus  high-mass  stars

Hot Cores (HCs)

Hot (100–200 K) cores often found close to UC HIIs:• H2O masers and high energy lines large nH2

and TK

• many rare molecules evaporation from dust grains• TK R-3/4 inner energy source• LIRAS 104 L ⊙ embedded OB star• a few HCs contain UC HIIs! OB stars• rotating circumstellar disks found in some HCs• molecular outflows from several HCs

HCs host young ZAMS high-mass stars

Page 24: The environment of star formation Theory:  low-mass  versus  high-mass  stars
Page 25: The environment of star formation Theory:  low-mass  versus  high-mass  stars
Page 26: The environment of star formation Theory:  low-mass  versus  high-mass  stars
Page 27: The environment of star formation Theory:  low-mass  versus  high-mass  stars

Hot Cores (HCs)

Hot (100–200 K) cores often found close to UC HIIs:• H2O masers and high energy lines large nH2

and TK

• many rare molecules evaporation from dust grains• TK R-3/4 inner energy source• LIRAS 104 L ⊙ embedded OB star• a few HCs contain UC HIIs! OB stars• rotating circumstellar disks found in some HCs• molecular outflows from several HCs

HCs host young ZAMS high-mass stars

Page 28: The environment of star formation Theory:  low-mass  versus  high-mass  stars
Page 29: The environment of star formation Theory:  low-mass  versus  high-mass  stars

Hot Cores (HCs)

Hot (100–200 K) cores often found close to UC HIIs:• H2O masers and high energy lines large nH2

and TK

• many rare molecules evaporation from dust grains• TK R-3/4 inner energy source• LIRAS 104 L⊙ embedded OB star• a few HCs contain UC HIIs! OB stars• rotating circumstellar disks found in some HCs• molecular outflows from several HCs

HCs host young ZAMS high-mass stars

Page 30: The environment of star formation Theory:  low-mass  versus  high-mass  stars
Page 31: The environment of star formation Theory:  low-mass  versus  high-mass  stars
Page 32: The environment of star formation Theory:  low-mass  versus  high-mass  stars

Hot Cores (HCs)

Hot (100–200 K) cores often found close to UC HIIs:• H2O masers and high energy lines large nH2

and TK

• many rare molecules evaporation from dust grains• TK R-3/4 inner energy source• LIRAS 104 L⊙ embedded OB star• a few HCs contain UC HIIs! OB stars• rotating circumstellar disks found in some HCs• molecular outflows from several HCs

HCs host young ZAMS high-mass stars

Page 33: The environment of star formation Theory:  low-mass  versus  high-mass  stars
Page 34: The environment of star formation Theory:  low-mass  versus  high-mass  stars
Page 35: The environment of star formation Theory:  low-mass  versus  high-mass  stars
Page 36: The environment of star formation Theory:  low-mass  versus  high-mass  stars
Page 37: The environment of star formation Theory:  low-mass  versus  high-mass  stars
Page 38: The environment of star formation Theory:  low-mass  versus  high-mass  stars
Page 39: The environment of star formation Theory:  low-mass  versus  high-mass  stars
Page 40: The environment of star formation Theory:  low-mass  versus  high-mass  stars

Hot Cores (HCs)

Hot (100–200 K) cores often found close to UC HIIs:• H2O masers and high energy lines large nH2

and TK

• many rare molecules evaporation from dust grains• TK R-3/4 inner energy source• LIRAS 104 L⊙ embedded OB star• a few HCs contain UC HIIs! OB stars• rotating circumstellar disks found in some HCs• molecular outflows from several HCs

HCs host young ZAMS high-mass stars

Page 41: The environment of star formation Theory:  low-mass  versus  high-mass  stars

Beuther et al. (2002)

Page 42: The environment of star formation Theory:  low-mass  versus  high-mass  stars

Hot Cores (HCs)

Hot (100–200 K) cores often found close to UC HIIs:• H2O masers and high energy lines large nH2

and TK

• many rare molecules evaporation from dust grains• TK R-3/4 inner energy source• LIRAS 104 L⊙ embedded OB star• a few HCs contain UC HIIs! OB stars• rotating circumstellar disks found in some HCs• molecular outflows from several HCs

HCs host young ZAMS high-mass stars

Page 43: The environment of star formation Theory:  low-mass  versus  high-mass  stars

Warm cores (WC)

Mostly towards IRAS sources with [25-12]<0.57 :

• warm (50 K) but dense and massive (10–102 M⊙)

• luminous (LIRAS 104 L⊙) high-mass YSOs

• few H2O masers (no OH masers) prior to HC phase

• no cm continuum emission hypercompact HII?• weak evidence for disks and outflows• interesting candidate: the case of G24.78+0.08

WCs may be “class 0” high-mass sources (?)

Page 44: The environment of star formation Theory:  low-mass  versus  high-mass  stars
Page 45: The environment of star formation Theory:  low-mass  versus  high-mass  stars

Warm cores (WC)

Mostly towards IRAS sources with [25-12]<0.57 :

• warm (50 K) but dense and massive (10–102 M⊙)

• luminous (LIRAS 104 L⊙) high-mass YSOs

• few H2O masers (no OH masers) prior to HC phase

• no cm continuum emission hypercompact HII?• weak evidence for disks and outflows• interesting candidate: the case of G24.78+0.08

WCs may be “class 0” high-mass sources (?)

Page 46: The environment of star formation Theory:  low-mass  versus  high-mass  stars

H2O maser

Page 47: The environment of star formation Theory:  low-mass  versus  high-mass  stars

Warm cores (WC)

Mostly towards IRAS sources with [25-12]<0.57 :

• warm (50 K) but dense and massive (10–102 M⊙)

• luminous (LIRAS 104 L⊙) high-mass YSOs

• few H2O masers (no OH masers) prior to HC phase

• no cm continuum emission hypercompact HII?• weak evidence for disks and outflows• interesting candidate: the case of G24.78+0.08

WCs may be “class 0” high-mass sources (?)

Page 48: The environment of star formation Theory:  low-mass  versus  high-mass  stars
Page 49: The environment of star formation Theory:  low-mass  versus  high-mass  stars

IRAS 23385+6053

Page 50: The environment of star formation Theory:  low-mass  versus  high-mass  stars

Warm cores (WC)

Mostly towards IRAS sources with [25-12]<0.57 :

• warm (50 K) but dense and massive (10–102 M⊙)

• luminous (LIRAS 104 L⊙) high-mass YSOs

• few H2O masers (no OH masers) prior to HC phase

• no cm continuum emission hypercompact HII?• weak evidence for disks and outflows• interesting candidate: the case of G24.78+0.08

WCs may be “class 0” high-mass sources (?)

Page 51: The environment of star formation Theory:  low-mass  versus  high-mass  stars

WC

HC

Page 52: The environment of star formation Theory:  low-mass  versus  high-mass  stars
Page 53: The environment of star formation Theory:  low-mass  versus  high-mass  stars
Page 54: The environment of star formation Theory:  low-mass  versus  high-mass  stars

Warm cores (WC)

Mostly towards IRAS sources with [25-12]<0.57 :

• warm (50 K) but dense and massive (10–102 M⊙)

• luminous (LIRAS 104 L⊙) high-mass YSOs

• few H2O masers (no OH masers) prior to HC phase

• no cm continuum emission hypercompact HII?• weak evidence for disks and outflows• interesting candidate: the case of G24.78+0.08

WCs may be “class 0” high-mass sources (?)

Page 55: The environment of star formation Theory:  low-mass  versus  high-mass  stars

Proposed evolutionary sequence

I. WC: dMacc/dt 10-5 M⊙/y squelches UC HII; e.g. IRAS 23385+6053: 104 L⊙, 40 K, 370 M⊙

II. HC: outflow+disk, non-spherical accretion? e.g. IRAS 20126+4104: 104 L⊙, 200 K, 10 M⊙

III. HC+ small UC HII: outflow+disk remnant, UC HII begins expansion; e.g. G10.47+0.03: 5 105 L⊙, 200 K, 103 M⊙

IV. HC+UC HII: outflow remnant, UC HII destroys HC; e.g. G5.89-0.39: 7 105 L⊙, 100 K, 3 103 M⊙

V. (UC)HII: HC is “evaporated”

Page 56: The environment of star formation Theory:  low-mass  versus  high-mass  stars

IRAS 23385+6053

Page 57: The environment of star formation Theory:  low-mass  versus  high-mass  stars

Proposed evolutionary sequence

I. WC: dMacc/dt 10-5 M⊙/y squelches UC HII; e.g. IRAS 23385+6053: 104 L⊙, 40 K, 370 M⊙

II. HC: outflow+disk, non-spherical accretion? e.g. IRAS 20126+4104: 104 L⊙, 200 K, 10 M⊙

III. HC+ small UC HII: outflow+disk remnant, UC HII begins expansion; e.g. G10.47+0.03: 5 105 L⊙, 200 K, 103 M⊙

IV. HC+UC HII: outflow remnant, UC HII destroys HC; e.g. G5.89-0.39: 7 105 L⊙, 100 K, 3 103 M⊙

V. (UC)HII: HC is “evaporated”

Page 58: The environment of star formation Theory:  low-mass  versus  high-mass  stars
Page 59: The environment of star formation Theory:  low-mass  versus  high-mass  stars

Proposed evolutionary sequence

I. WC: dMacc/dt 10-5 M⊙/y squelches UC HII; e.g. IRAS 23385+6053: 104 L⊙, 40 K, 370 M⊙

II. HC: outflow+disk, non-spherical accretion? e.g. IRAS 20126+4104: 104 L⊙, 200 K, 10 M⊙

III. HC+ small UC HII: outflow+disk remnant, UC HII begins expansion; e.g. G10.47+0.03: 5 105 L⊙, 200 K, 103 M⊙

IV. HC+UC HII: outflow remnant, UC HII destroys HC; e.g. G5.89-0.39: 7 105 L⊙, 100 K, 3 103 M⊙

V. (UC)HII: HC is “evaporated”

Page 60: The environment of star formation Theory:  low-mass  versus  high-mass  stars
Page 61: The environment of star formation Theory:  low-mass  versus  high-mass  stars

Proposed evolutionary sequence

I. WC: dMacc/dt 10-5 M⊙/y squelches UC HII; e.g. IRAS 23385+6053: 104 L⊙, 40 K, 370 M⊙

II. HC: outflow+disk, non-spherical accretion? e.g. IRAS 20126+4104: 104 L⊙, 200 K, 10 M⊙

III. HC+ small UC HII: outflow+disk remnant, UC HII begins expansion; e.g. G10.47+0.03: 5 105 L⊙, 200 K, 103 M⊙

IV. HC+UC HII: outflow remnant, UC HII destroys HC; e.g. G5.89-0.39: 7 105 L⊙, 100 K, 3 103 M⊙

V. (UC)HII: HC is “evaporated”

Page 62: The environment of star formation Theory:  low-mass  versus  high-mass  stars
Page 63: The environment of star formation Theory:  low-mass  versus  high-mass  stars

Proposed evolutionary sequence

I. WC: dMacc/dt 10-5 M⊙/y squelches UC HII; e.g. IRAS 23385+6053: 104 L⊙, 40 K, 370 M⊙

II. HC: outflow+disk, non-spherical accretion? e.g. IRAS 20126+4104: 104 L⊙, 200 K, 10 M⊙

III. HC+ small UC HII: outflow+disk remnant, UC HII begins expansion; e.g. G10.47+0.03: 5 105 L⊙, 200 K, 103 M⊙

IV. HC+UC HII: outflow remnant, UC HII destroys HC; e.g. G5.89-0.39: 7 105 L⊙, 100 K, 3 103 M⊙

V. (UC)HII: HC is “evaporated”

Page 64: The environment of star formation Theory:  low-mass  versus  high-mass  stars

Conclusions

High-mass YSOs are associated with:

• large accretion rates

• outflows and circumstellar disks

High-mass stars could form through accretion as much as low-mass stars