the effect of terrain and land surface on summer monsoon convection in the himalayan region
DESCRIPTION
The effect of terrain and land surface on summer monsoon convection in the Himalayan region. Socorro Medina, Robert Houze, Anil Kumar, and Dev Niyogi. 13 th Conference on Mountain Meteorology), Whistler, BC, Canada, 12 August 2008. Orographic Precipitation in cold and warm climates. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
The effect of terrain and land surface on summer monsoon convection in the
Himalayan region
Socorro Medina, Robert Houze,
Anil Kumar, and Dev Niyogi13th Conference on Mountain Meteorology), Whistler, BC, Canada, 12 August 2008
Orographic Precipitation in cold and warm climates
ALPS – MAP (1999)OR CASCADES – IMPROVE-2 (2001)
HIMALAYAS
• Terrain gradients• Land-ocean contrast• Land cover gradients
Snow/Ice
Tundra
Wetland
Forest
Irrigated crop
Crop
Savanna
Shurb/Grass
Dryland/crop
Grass
Shurb
Barren
Thar DesertGanges Delta
OBJECTIVE
• Observational studies (Sawyer et al. 1947, Houze et al. 2007) proposed hypotheses on how monsoon convection forms
• Objective: Test hypotheses (in following slides) using model simulations
Model/data used
• Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF v2.1.1) model with single-moment bulk microphysical parameterization with 6 water substances
• Complemented with NCEP data
Dominant type of systems
Deep and wide convectivesystems
Broad stratiform echoes(embedded in convective
systems)
Wide convective system in western indentation
3 September 2003
Domain 1 (dx = 9 km) Domain 2 (dx = 3 km)
Accumulated precipitation and terrain
INDIAPAK
ISTA
N
HIMALAYASHIN
DU
KU
SH
Evaluation: 3D Reflectivity structure (~22 UTC 3 Sep [~03 LST 4 Sep])OBSERVATION (TRMM-PR)
Horizontal crosssections at 4 km
Vertical crosssections alongblack line
Vertical crosssections alongred line
SIMULATION
dBZ
0 100 200Distance (km)
Hei
ght (
km)
0
8
1
6
0 100 200Distance (km)
Hei
ght (
km)
0
8
1
6
0 125 250Distance (km)
Hei
ght (
km)
0
8
1
6
0 125 250Distance (km)
Hei
ght (
km)
0
8
1
6
HYPOTHESIS: Dry line
SURFACE DEW POINT DEPRESSIONAND 2 AND 4 KM TERRAIN CONTOURS
Valid: 18 UTC 3 Sep (23 LST) Forecast : 0 h (1 h before convection initialization)
HYPOTHESIS: Moist low-level flow from Arabian Sea, dry flow aloft from Tibetan or
Afghan mountains
SURFACE MIXING RATIO (g/kg)NOAA HYSPLIT (NCEP FNL)BACKWARD TRAJECTORIES
1.0 AGL km3.5 AGL km
Valid: 18 UTC 3 Sep (23 LST) Forecast : 0 h
End time: 18 UTC 3 Sep (23 LST) Elapsed period between markers: 24 h
HYPOTHESIS: High surface sensible heat flux as low-level air moves over Thar Desert
NCEP time series
HYPOTHESIS: Convection triggered over foothills
TERRAIN AND COLUMN INTEGRATED
PRECIPITATION HYDROMETEORS (10 mm)
TOTAL PRECIP. MIXING RATIO
Valid: 19 UTC 3 Sep (00 LST). Forecast : 1 h
N
6.0 g kg-1
CONCLUSIONS WIDE CONVECTIVE CASE
• Moist low-level flow from Arabian Sea heated by passage over Thar Desert
• Western indentation of barrier allows low-level moisture and buoyancy to build up
• Elevated layer of dry, warm air from Afghan mountains caps the moist low-level flow
• Convection triggered by orographic lifting over the small peaks