the effect of food allergen introduction whilst breast-feeding on the development of food...
TRANSCRIPT
J ALLERGY CLIN IMMUNOL
FEBRUARY 2010
AB64 AbstractsSA
TU
RD
AY
250 Patients with a History of Anaphylaxis to Penicillin CanReceive Pre-Operative Cephalosporins Safely
J. T. Li, K. L. Rossow, M. A. Park; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
RATIONALE: This study reviewed the penicillin skin test results of pa-
tients with a history of anaphylaxis to penicillin, and the risk of reaction
to cephalosporins in patients with negative skin tests to penicillins.
METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted at an academic med-
ical center with 8 allergists. The penicillin allergy database was queried us-
ing patient reported anaphylaxis as a search term. Out of 15298 patients
with a history of penicillin allergy and evaluated by an allergist, 193 pa-
tients reported a history of anaphylactic reaction to penicillin. Charts
were reviewed for penicillin skin test results, the administration of pre-
operative cephalosporins and for possible adverse drug events.
RESULTS: Out of 193 patients with a history of anaphylaxis to penicillin,
15 (7.8%) patients were not tested due to negative histamine controls. Out
of the 178 patients skin tested, ten patients (5.6%) had equivocal results.
Twelve (6.7%) had positive skin tests to the major and/or minor determi-
nants of penicillin, and one-hundred fifty-six (87.6%) had negative skin
tests to penicillin. This compares with a historical positive skin test rate
of 4% from patients with any history of penicillin allergy (P 5 0.13).
Eighty patients with negative skin tests to penicillin went on to receive a
cephalosporin antibiotic as prophylaxis during surgery. One patient
(1.25%) had an adverse drug reaction to cephalosporins (muscle and joint
pain after a plastic surgery procedure).
CONCLUSIONS: Most patients (98.8%) with a history of anaphylaxis to
penicillin and with negative skin tests are able to tolerate cephalosporins.
251 The Effect of Food Allergen Introduction Whilst Breast-feeding on the Development of Food Hypersensitivity
C. Venter1, J. Grundy1, C. B. Clayton1, B. N. Pereira1, B. Higgins2, T.
Dean2; 1The David Hide Asthma and Allergy Research Centre, Newport,
UNITED KINGDOM, 2University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UNITED
KINGDOM.
RATIONALE: Recently, much interest has been evoked by data from
large cohort studies indicating that the introduction of wheat whilst
breast-feeding may prevent the development of celiac disease. This lead
to the hypothesis that weaning and the introduction of allergenic foods
whilst breast-feeding, may prevent the development of FHS.
METHODS: All pregnant women with an estimated delivery time be-
tween 1st September 2001 to 31st August 2002 were approached at antena-
tal clinics on the Isle of Wight to participate in this study. Following
consent, information regarding family history of allergy (parental or sib-
ling), was obtained by means of a standardised questionnaire. At three,
six and nine months, as well as one, two and three years, information re-
garding feeding practices and reported symptoms of atopy were obtained
using a standardised questionnaire administered by telephone. FHS were
diagnosed by means of a food challenge or sensitisation to the food plus
a good clinical history.
RESULTS: 969 families were recruited into the study. 54 of these children
developed a FHS to 67 foods: milk (26), egg (19), fish (1), wheat (5 [of
which 1 child was diagnosed with celiac disease]), peanut (11) and sesame
(5). Of these 67 FHS seen, 32 (47.8%) of the foods were introduced whilst
the mother was still breast feeding: milk (17/26; 65.4%), egg (8/19;
42.1%), wheat (2/5; 40%), fish (1/1; 100%), peanut (2/11; 18%) and ses-
ame (2/5; 40%).
CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggests that introduction of the allergenic
foods during breastfeeding in this small group of children, did not seem
to have a preventative effect.
252 Bacteriostatic Agents and Sterility Requirements for AllergenImmunotherapy
K. L. Rossow1, D. Lowe2, M. Butler2, J. T. Li1; 1Mayo Clinic, Rochester,
MN, 2Olmsted Medical Center, Rochester, MN.
RATIONALE: We studied the effectiveness of bacteriostatic agents used
in current immunotherapy practice and determined the concentrations of
phenol and glycerin necessary to suppress microbial growth.
METHODS: Two sets of experiments were performed in parallel, one set
performed under the vertical hood with sterile technique; the other set on
the bench top. Sterile, 5ml vials were prepared with 5ml of preservative
free diluent with varying concentrations of phenol (from 0 up to 0.25%)
or glycerin (from 0 up to 20%), with or without cat hair allergen extract.
The vials were stored at 4 degrees Celsius for a 1 month period. During
this 1 month period, a total of 10 manipulations (10 punctures of the vials
with syringes) were performed on the bench top to each separate vial. 100
expired immunotherapy vials (prepared in a vertical hood) from 2 medical
centers were collected prospectively. All vials were cultured for bacterial
growth using 1 blood plate, 1 anaerobic plate, and thioglycolate broth.
RESULTS: None of the 100 expired immunotherapy vials showed micro-
bial growth. Out of 3 different concentrations of phenol and 4 different con-
centrations of glycerin tested, prepared under the hood or on the bench top,
none showed microbial growth.
CONCLUSIONS: These studies suggest that current immunotherapy
practice is highly effective at preventing microbial growth, that a sterile
hood may not be necessary to ensure the sterility of allergenic extracts
and that the sterility of immunotherapy extracts are preserved even with
low concentrations of phenol and/or glycerin.
253 Influence of Comorbidities on AsthmaT. S. Estes; Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond,
VA.
RATIONALE: Since there is a need for further understanding of how co-
morbidities influence asthma, this research examined the relationships be-
tween comorbidities and asthma severity, control, medication adherence,
pulmonary function, and healthcare utilization.
METHODS: The study used a cross-sectional design with self-report
measures and spirometry. Eleven comorbidities were measured (history
of allergic rhinitis, atopic dermatitis, chronic fatigue syndrome, food al-
lergy, gastroesophageal reflux disease, laryngopharyngeal reflux, obesity,
obstructive sleep apnea, sinusitis, and nicotine addiction). Study instru-
ments included the Severity of Asthma Score, Perceived Control of
Asthma Questionnaire, and Adherence Schedule in Asthma. Healthcare
utilization assessed emergency room visits, hospital admissions, and inten-
sive care unit admissions for asthma in the past year. Data analysis included
descriptive, analysis of variance, and multivariate methods.
RESULTS: The selected comorbidities (n 5 225 patients) were significant
predictors of asthma control (F 5 2.9; p 5 0.002) and asthma medication
adherence (F 5 6.6; p < 0.0001) with allergic rhinitis and nicotine addic-
tion being the most important. Of those patients denying comorbidities
(n 5 10), 40% had severe asthma.
CONCLUSIONS: Comorbidities, especially allergic rhinitis and nicotine
addiction may be important influencing factors in asthma control and
asthma medication adherence. In general, comorbidities are pervasive oc-
curring at all levels of asthma severity. However, severe asthma can occur
without comorbidities.