the comprehensive portfolio - university of oklahoma eacs... · the comprehensive portfolio...
TRANSCRIPT
THE COMPREHENSIVE PORTFOLIO ASSESSMENT AND HANDBOOK
Building Level Leadership
Students in the Master’s Degree and Principal Certification Programs
Updated Fall 2015
Educational Administration, Curriculum and Supervision
Department of Educational Leadership & Policy Studies
The Jeannine Rainbolt College of Education
The University of Oklahoma
820 Van Vleet Oval
Norman, OK 73019
http://education.ou.edu/departments/eacs/
2
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Introduction ............................................................................................................3
Portfolio Development ...........................................................................................5
Portfolio Document ................................................................................................5
Appendix A: Artifacts, Portfolio Format and Evaluation ...............................10
Appendix B: Portfolio Prompts and Scoring Guide .........................................13
Portfolio Scoring Rubric for Prompts................................................................19
3
Educational Administration, Curriculum and Supervision
Comprehensive Portfolio Development and Evaluation
INTRODUCTION
All students in a master’s or principal certification program in Educational Administration, Curriculum and Supervision (EACS) are
required to successfully complete and submit a portfolio prior to the completion of the program. For students in a master’s program, the
portfolio constitutes the comprehensive examination for the non-thesis program.
Purpose
The Comprehensive Portfolio provides the master’s and/or certification candidate the opportunity to document his/her accomplishments,
and skills related to educational leadership and administration. The process of portfolio development and the substance of the portfolio
document are under girded by the mission of the EACS Program Area and the College of Education as well as the conceptual framework
of Program Area.
College of Education Mission Statement
The mission of the College of Education is to promote inquiry and practices that foster democratic life and that are fundamental to the
interrelated activities of teaching, research, and practice in the multi-disciplinary field of education.
EACS Mission Statement
The mission of EACS is to promote critical inquiry that addresses important issues relating to teaching, learning, and leadership in order
that service and collaboration among colleagues and the professional communities may be enhanced.
EACS Conceptual Framework
The Educational Administration, Curriculum and Supervision (EACS) area believes that PK-12 schools are complex organizations that
need leaders who understand: 1) the theoretical and conceptual aspects of schools, their people, and programs for both children and adults
who are constantly learning from the context of the organization; 2) the technical knowledge of the content areas and areas of
specialization found within the EACS knowledge bases; 3) the integration of theory, research, and practice as a means of grounding new
best practices.
4
The EACS curriculum is under girded by a dynamic knowledge base that reflects current and recommended practices as examined
through basic and applied research. The EACS graduate should be able to transfer theory and research into practice and to analyze
practice through theory and research. To this end, theory, research, and practice are viewed as reciprocal and equal in developing and
refining program area offerings. The curriculum is vertically and horizontally articulated, allowing students the opportunity to study both
the broader area of leadership and an area of emphasis as they become proficient in understanding, applying, and conducting research -
both formally, as scholar leaders, and informally, as informed practitioners through action research. The curriculum provides the
conceptual and philosophical bases of continuing education as students develop specified competencies.
The EACS faculty recognize the unique learning needs of our adult students. Accordingly, the faculty encourages learning through the
utilization of a variety of instructional approaches (e.g., lecture, discussion, large and small group work, computer and non-computer
simulation, site visitations, and interactions with practitioners) in order to properly engage students in learning.
Further, the faculty of EACS recognize that as an outgrowth of its conceptual framework there are knowledge bases accepted by learned
societies such as UCEA and the National Policy Board For Educational Administration (NPBEA). Within these accepted but evolving
knowledge bases there are competencies and skills that may also be applied in regulated field experiences such as internships and practica.
The competencies and skills evolve (broadly) around the following:
1. societal and cultural influences on schooling;
2. teaching and learning processes that are responsive to individual differences among
students, teachers, administrators, and families;
3. theories of organizations and organizational change;
4. policy analysis and studies (e.g., legal and economic);
5. leadership and professional development;
6. moral and ethical dimensions of schooling in a pluralistic society;
7. instructional and administrative technologies available to support effective school
leadership and decision making.
STANDARDS
The Comprehensive Portfolio is grounded in the standards for advanced programs in Educational Leadership for Principals by the
Educational Leadership Constituent Council (ELCC).
5
PORTFOLIO DEVELOPMENT
The portfolio development process is ongoing. Beginning at the interview for admission, the admissions committee will discuss portfolio
requirements with the applicant. Students should begin preparing the portfolio upon entering the program and should continue through
the time of formal submission of the final document.
At the time of admission, a student is assigned a faculty advisor. Although the candidate is ultimately responsibility for developing the
portfolio document and preparing for the presentation, the faculty advisor assumes an important advisory role in the portfolio
development process.
The portfolio must draw on required EACS courses of the program. The student should use the standard Course Portfolio Evaluation
form, located in the Appendix. Completed course evaluation forms should be included in the student’s Comprehensive Portfolio.
PORTFOLIO DOCUMENT
The portfolio consists of two parts. The first of these is the NARRATIVE section, which includes written responses to the 19 portfolio
prompts. Second is the APPENDIX, which includes artifacts to support the written responses. Each of these sections is described in
detail below.
NARRATIVE SECTION
The narrative section includes six documents, each including responses to several prompts (between three and five prompts per document,
depending on the ELCC standard). Each of the six documents will include approximately 10 pages of narrative. Each response, to a
specific prompt, should cite scholarly literature and best practices in support of the discussion, and a list of references should be included
at the end of each of the six documents. Each response MUST refer to specific artifacts in the Appendix of the portfolio that support that
response. The written response to each individual prompt coupled with artifacts MUST demonstrate your competency in the relevant
ELCC standard elements. Portfolio reviewers will provide a separate, stand-alone evaluation for each individual prompt response and
supporting artifacts (the scoring rubrics are included in the Appendix).
6
PROMPTS
Following are the prompts, along with courses that can be used as a basis for the written response and artifacts: Remember, your
responses MUST demonstrate your understanding of and your ability to apply ELCC standards.
Document 1: Visionary Leadership – A building-level leader must have knowledge of how to promote the success of students by
understanding principles for the development, articulation, implementation, and stewardship of a school vision of learning.
1. Define vision and discuss the role of the educational leader to develop, articulate, implement, and steward a shared vision of
learning. (ELCC 1.1)
EACS 5233 Organization of Education, EACS 5543 School Level Instructional Leadership
2. Identify and discuss specific school variables related to organizational effectiveness (grounded in theory and evidence). Provide
specific strategies for data collection, data use and plan development for school improvement. (ELCC 1.2)
EACS 5233 Organization of Education, EACS 5403 Inquiry for Performance Improvement
3. Explain a principal’s role in the promotion of continuous and sustained improvement, such as but not limited to vision and change
processes (ground in theory and evidence). (ELCC 1.3)
EACS 5233 Organization of Education, EACS 5920 Principal Internship, EACS 5403 Inquiry for Performance Improvement
4. Explain how to evaluate school progress and how to evaluate and revise plans supported by school stakeholders. (ELCC 1.4)
EACS 5233 Organization of Education, EACS 5403 Inquiry for Performance Improvement
Document 2: Instructional Leadership – A building-level leader must have knowledge of principles for advocating, nurturing and
sustaining a school culture and instructional programs conducive to student learning and staff professional growth.
5. Explain how a principal promotes student success through a school culture and instructional program with collaboration, trust
and a personalized learning environment (ground in theory and evidence). (ELCC 2.1)
EACS 5543 School Level Instructional Leadership, EACS 5573 Supervision of Instruction, EACS 5920 Principal Internship
6. Discuss research-based practices for creating and evaluating a comprehensive, rigorous, and coherent curricular and
instructional school program. (ELCC 2.2)
EACS 5543 School Level Instructional Leadership, EACS 5573 Supervision of Instruction, EACS 5920 Principal Internship
7
7. How can a leader develop and supervise the instructional and leadership capacity of school staff? (ELCC 2.3)
EACS 5573 Supervision of Instruction, EACS 5920 Principal Internship
8. Discuss a leader’s role in promoting effective and appropriate technologies to support teaching and learning in a school
environment. (ELCC 2.4)
EACS 5573 Supervision of Instruction, EACS 5920 Principal Internship
Document 3: Organizational Leadership – A building-level leader must have knowledge of best practices regarding management
of a school organization, operations, and resources for a safe, efficient, and effective learning environment.
9. Provide recommendations (based on theory and evidence) for the effective use of organizational planning, monitoring, and
evaluation of school management and operations that focus on learning needs of students. (ELCC 3.1)
EACS 5343 Financial Leadership in Schools
10. What are key elements, based on theory and evidence, of effective school level fiscal and technological operations? Include specific
recommendations for policies and procedures that protect the welfare and safety of students and staff within the school.
(ELCC 3.2, 3.3)
EACS 5343 Financial Leadership in Schools, EACS 5543 School Level Instructional Leadership, EACS 5920 Principal Internship
11. Explain how features of distributed school leadership can promote and encourage instructional practices that support high-
quality instruction and student learning. Discuss the role of the principal to develop school capacity for distributed leadership,
and the role of the principal to ensure teacher and organizational time focuses on supporting high-quality school instruction
and student learning. Include evidence and theory to support your claims/rationale. (ELCC 3.4, 3.5)
EACS 5543 School Level Instructional Leadership, EACS 5920 Principal Internship
Document 4: Collaborative Leadership – A building-level leader must have knowledge of strategies for collaboration with faculty
and community members, understanding of diverse community interests and needs, and best practices for mobilizing community
resources.
12. Explain how collaborating with faculty and community members in collecting and analyzing information related to the schools
larger educational environment can enhance student success. (ELCC 4.1) EACS 5333 Politics in Educational Administration, EACS 5920 Principal Internship
8
13. Describe the types of resources within the larger school environment that school leaders can mobilize to enhance learning
opportunities for all students. (ELCC 4.2)
EACS 5333 Politics in Educational Administration, EACS 5920 Principal Internship
14. Discuss strategies and actions that school leaders can use to build and sustain cooperative relationships with families, caregivers,
and community partners. (ELCC 4.3, 4.4)
EACS 5333 Politics in Educational Administration, EACS 5920 Principal Internship
Document 5: Ethical Leadership - A building-level leader models and applies knowledge that promotes the success of every
student by acting with integrity, fairness, and engages in ethical manner to ensure a school system of accountability for every
student’s academic and social success.
15. What is your understanding of integrity and acting with integrity? How is that different from the multiple meanings of fairness
that would ensures student academic and social success? (ELCC 5.1) EACS 5243 Education and the Law, EACS 5573 Supervision of Instruction, EACS 5920 Principal Internship
16. Describe the commonly recognized ethical reference points for decision making available
to the educational leader. How do these systems or “paradigms” help you when interacting with others by modeling principles of
self-awareness and making moral and legal decisions? (ELCC 5.2, 5.4)
EACS 5243 Education and the Law, EACS 5573 Supervision of Instruction, EACS 5920 Principal Internship
17. What are the foundational principles of social justice? Why are the values of democracy, equity, and diversity paramount in
public schooling? (ELCC 5.3, 5.5)
EACS 5243 Education and the Law, EACS 5573 Supervision of Instruction, EACS 5920 Principal Internship
Document 6: Contextual Leadership – A building-level leader must have knowledge of how to respond to and influence the
political, social, economic, legal, and cultural context within a school.
18. Describe the major areas of inquiry that guide education law and provide key case law analysis for school policy making that would
allow you to be an advocate for students, families, and caregivers. (ELCC 6.1) EACS 5243 Education and the Law, EACS 5920 Principal Internship
9
19. Discuss current issues in education law with their policy solutions and emerging trends. How must these be communicated with
school stakeholders to influence local, district, state, and national decisions affecting student learning for the improvement
of the school community especially as they relate to influencing decisions that affect student learning and to adapt school-
based leadership strategies? (ELCC 6.2, 6.3) EACS 5243 Education and the Law, EACS 5920 Principal Internship
10
APPENDIX A
This section will contain all of the documents and artifacts that support the responses to the prompts. Examples of artifacts by ELCC
standard elements include:
Standard 1.0 (ELCC 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, and 1.4)
EACS 5233 Organization of Education Development of Vision Performance Activity; Vision Plan activity
EACS 5233 Organization of Education Field Experience
EACS 5533 School Level Instructional Leadership Models of Best Practices in Education Essay; A Plan of Instructional
Improvement
EACS 5920 Principal Internship for ELCC 1.3
EACS 5403 Inquiry for Performance Improvement Continuous Improvement Plan or Problem Solving Study or related
assignments with data use for school improvement decisions
Other artifacts that demonstrate your skills and competency related to visionary leadership
Standard 2.0 (ELCC 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, and 2.4)
EACS 5543 School Level Instructional Leadership Models of Best Practices in Education Essay; A Plan of Instructional
Improvement
EACS 5573 Supervision of Instruction Authentic Supervision Activity
EACS 5543 School Level Instructional Leadership Field Experience
EACS 5573 Supervision of Instruction Field Experience
EACS 5920 Principal Internship for ELCC Elements 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, and 2.4
Other artifacts that demonstrate your skills and competency related to visionary leadership
Standard 3.0 (ELCC 3.1, 3.2, and 3.3)
EACS 5343 Financial Leadership Organizational and Resource Management Activity
EACS 5343 Financial Leadership School Operations Activity
EACS 5343 Financial Leadership Field Experience
11
EACS 5543 School Level Instructional Leadership Models of Best Practices in Education Essay: A Plan of Instructional
Improvement
EACS 5920 Principal Internship for ELCC Element 3.2
Other artifacts that demonstrate your skills and competency related to organizational leadership
Standard 4.0 (ELCC 4.1, 4.2, and 4.3)
EACS 5333 Politics in Ed Admin Legislative Policy Brief paper/presentation
EACS 5333 Politics in Ed Admin Interviews with school board members/class presentation
EACS 5333 Politics in Ed Admin Field Experience
EACS 5920 Principal Internship for ELCC Element 4.1
EACS 5920 Principal Internship for ELCC Element 4.2
EACS 5920 Principal Internship for ELCC Element 4.3
Other artifacts that demonstrate your skills and competency related to collaborative leadership
Standard 5.0 (ELCC 5.1, 5.2, and 5.3)
EACS 5573 Supervision of Instruction Authentic Supervision Activity
EACS 5263 Education and the Law Performance and Field Activity
EACS 5593 Principal Leadership; Case Narrative and Analysis
EACS 5920 Principal Internship for ELCC Element 5.1
EACS 5920 Principal Internship for ELCC Element 5.2
EACS 5920 Principal Internship for ELCC Element 5.3
Other artifacts that demonstrate your skills and competency related to ethical leadership
Standard 6.0 (ELCC 61, 6.2, and 6.3)
EACS 5533 School Level Instructional Leadership Models of Best Practices in Education Essay; A Plan of Instructional Improvement
EACS 5263 Education and the Law Legal Analysis Performance Activity
EACS 5920 Principal Internship for ELCC Element 6.1
EACS 5920 Principal Internship for ELCC Element 6.2
EACS 5920 Principal Internship for ELCC Element 6.3
Other artifacts that demonstrate your skills and competency related to leadership in the larger context
12
PORTFOLIO FORMAT
The Portfolio document MUST be submitted in electronic format. Students who have been admitted to candidacy should have a link to
the EACS Comprehensive Portfolio through learn.ou.edu under Permanent Courses (if the link is not available, please contact ELPS
staff). Please upload the portfolio into the Dropbox. Instructions for the order of the narratives and artifacts are included in the Dropbox.
Please ensure that your uploaded submission is complete. Also, allow yourself time to access the learn.ou.edu site to ensure that you are
able to submit all documents by the designated portfolio submission due date. If you are experiencing technical difficulties to upload your
documents to the Dropbox, you should notify the ELPS staff.
Each page comprising the portfolio should be in one of the following file formats:
Portable document format (.pdf file);
Microsoft office format (.doc, xls, .ppt files);
Word document in rich text format (.rtf file); or,
Hyperlink markup language (.htm file)
Other file formats may be used if the EACS program area coordinator grants permission PRIOR to the submission of the portfolio.
PORTFOLIO EVALUATION
The portfolio will typically be due 10 business days prior to the final day of classes of the semester in which it is to be submitted, unless
an alternative date is indicated by program area coordinator at the beginning of the semester.
Please refer to the Comprehensive Portfolio Scoring Guide included in Appendix B. The portfolio document will be evaluated by at least
three members of the faculty. Faculty reviewers will use the scoring rubric to evaluate each of the responses as ‘Meets Expectations’ (2
points) ‘Expectation’s Minimally Met’ (1 point), or ‘Expectation Not Met’ (0 points). An average score will then be derived for each
response. In order to earn a SATISFACTORY, a candidate must receive an average evaluation of ‘Expectations Minimally Met’ or
‘Meets Expectations’ (average score of 1 or higher) on EACH of the 19 responses.
The expectation of the faculty is that all candidates will successfully complete the portfolio process. However, any student who receives
an UNSATISFACTORY or ‘Expectations Not Met’ score may attempt to successfully complete the process at least one semester later
(by Graduate College policy). It is anticipated that candidate will make substantive changes to the portfolio document to help ensure
success during this second attempt. These changes are critical because a candidate is allowed a maximum of two attempts.
13
APPENDIX B
PORTFOLIO PROMPTS AND SCORING GUIDE
ELCC Standard One: A building-level education leader applies knowledge that promotes the success of every student by collaboratively
facilitating the development, articulation, implementation, and stewardship of a shared school vision of learning through the collection and
use of data to identify school goals, assess organizational effectiveness, and implement school plans to achieve school goals; promotion of
continual and sustainable school improvement; and evaluation of school progress and revision of school plans supported by school-based
stakeholders.
Prompts for Standards 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, and 1.4:
Prompt 1. Define vision and discuss the role of the educational leader to develop, articulate, implement, and steward a shared vision working with
diverse stakeholders.
Assessment of candidate’s ability to understand and collaboratively develop, articulate, implement, and steward a shared vision of learning for a
school: (ELCC 1.1)
Prompt 2. Identify and discuss specific school variables related to organizational effectiveness (grounded in theory and evidence). Provide specific
strategies for data collection, data use and plan development for school improvement.)
Assessment of candidate’s ability to understand and can collect and use data to identify school goals, assess organizational effectiveness, and
create and implement plans to achieve school goals:
(ELCC 1.2)
Prompt 3. Explain a principal’s role in the promotion of continuous and sustained improvement, such as but not limited to vision and change processes
(ground in theory and evidence).
Assessment of candidate’s ability to understand and can promote continual and sustainable school improvement: (ELCC 1.3)
Prompt 4. Explain how to monitor and evaluate improvement plans and how to communicate this progress with stakeholders.
Assessment of candidate’s ability to understand can evaluate school progress and revise school plans supported by school stakeholders: (ELCC 1.4)
14
ELCC Standard 2.0: A building-level education leader applies knowledge that promotes the success of every student by sustaining a school
culture and instructional program conducive to student learning through collaboration, trust, and a personalized learning environment with
high expectations for students; creating and evaluating a comprehensive, rigorous and coherent curricular and instructional school
program; developing and supervising the instructional and leadership capacity of school staff; and promoting the most effective and
appropriate technologies to support teaching and learning within a school environment.
Prompts for Standards 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, and 2.4:
Prompt 5. Explain how a principal promotes student success through a school culture and instructional program with collaboration, trust and a personalized
learning environment (ground in theory and evidence).
Assessment of candidate’s ability to understand and sustain a school culture and instructional program conducive to student learning
through collaboration, trust, and a personalized learning environment with high expectations for students: (ELCC 2.1)
Prompt 6. Discuss research-based practices for creating and evaluating a comprehensive rigorous, and coherent curricular and instructional school
program.
Assessment of candidate’s ability to understand and create and evaluate a comprehensive, rigorous, and coherent curricular and
instructional school program: (ELCC 2.2)
Prompt 7. How can a leader develop and supervise the instructional and leadership capacity of school staff?
Assessments of candidate’s ability to understand and develop and supervise the instructional and leadership capacity of school staff:
(ELCC 2.3)
Prompt 8. Discuss a leader’s role in promoting effective and appropriate technologies to support teaching and learning in a school environment.
Candidates understand and can promote the most effective and appropriate technologies to support teaching and learning in a school
environment: (ELCC 2.4)
15
ELCC Standard 3.0: A building-level education leader applies knowledge that promotes the success of every student by ensuring the
management of the school organization, operation, and resources through monitoring and evaluating the school management and
operational systems; efficiently using human, fiscal, and technological resources in a school environment; promoting and protecting the
welfare and safety of school students and staff; developing school capacity for distributed leadership; and ensuring that teacher and
organizational time is focused to support high-quality instruction and student learning.
Prompts 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.4, and 3.5:
Prompt 9. Provide recommendations (based on theory and evidence) for the effective use of organizational planning, management and evaluation of school
management and operations that focus on learning needs of students.
Assessment of the candidates understanding of monitoring and evaluation school management and operational systems: (ELCC 3.1)
Prompt 10. What are key elements, based on theory and evidence, of effective school level fiscal operations? Include specific recommendations for policies
and procedures that protect the welfare and safety of students and staff within the school.
Assessment of candidates ability to understand and efficiently use human, fiscal, and technological resources to manage school operations and can
understand and promote school-based policies and procedures that protect the welfare and safety of students and staff across the school:
(ELCC 3.2, 3.3)
Prompt 11. Explain how features of distributed school leadership can promote and encourage instructional practices that support high-quality
instruction and student learning. Discuss the role of the principal to develop school capacity for distributed leadership, and the role of the principal to
ensure teacher and organizational time focuses on supporting high-quality school instruction and student learning. Include evidence and theory to
support your claims/rationale.
Assessment of candidate’s ability to understand and develop school capacity for distributed leadership and to understand and ensure teacher and
organizational time focuses on supporting high-quality school instruction and student learning: (ELCC 3.4, 3.5)
16
ELCC Standard 4.0: A building-level education leader applies knowledge that promotes the success of every student by collaborating with faculty
and community members, responding to diverse community interests and needs, and mobilizing community resources on behalf of the school by
collecting and analyzing information pertinent to improvement of the school’s educational environment; promoting an understanding, appreciation,
and use of the diverse cultural, social, and intellectual resources within the school community; building and sustaining positive school relationships
with families and caregivers; and cultivating productive school relationships and community partners.
Prompts 4.1, 4.2, 4.3 and 4.4:
Prompt 12. Explain how collaborating with faculty and community members in collecting and analyzing information related to the schools larger
educational environment can enhance student success.
Assessment of candidate’s ability to understand and collaborate with faculty and community members by collecting and analyzing information
pertinent to the improvement of the school’s educational environment: (ELCC 4.1)
Prompt 13. Describe the types of resources within the larger school environment that school leaders can mobilize to enhance learning opportunities
for all students.
Assessment of candidates ability to understand and mobilize resources by promoting understanding, appreciation, and use of the community’s
diverse cultural, social, and intellectual resources within the school community: (ELCC 4.2)
Prompt 14. Discuss strategies and actions that school leaders can use to build and sustain cooperative relationships with families, caregivers, and
community partners.
Assessment of candidate’s ability to understand and respond to community interests and needs by building and sustaining positive relationships with
families and caregivers: (ELCC 4.3, 4.4)
17
ELCC Standard 5.0: A building-level education leader applies knowledge that promotes the success of every student by acting with integrity,
fairness, and in an ethical manner to ensure a school system of accountability for every student’s academic and social success by modeling
school principles of self-awareness, reflective practice, transparency, and ethical behavior as related to their roles within the school;
safeguarding the values of democracy, equity, and diversity within the school; evaluating the potential moral and legal consequences of
decision making in the school; and promoting social justice within the school to ensure that individual student needs inform all aspects of
schooling.
Prompts 5.1, 5.2, 5.3, 5.4, and 5.5:
Prompt 15. What is your understanding of integrity and acting with integrity? How is that different from the multiple meanings of fairness so as to
ensure student academic and social success?
Assessment of candidate’s ability to understand and act with integrity and fairness to ensure a school system of accountability for every student’s
academic and social success: (ELCC 5.1)
Prompt 16. Describe the commonly recognized ethical reference points for decision-making available to the educational leader. How do these
systems or “paradigms” help you when interacting with others and making decisions?
Assessment of candidates ability to understand and model principles of self-awareness, reflective practice, transparency, and ethical behaviors as
related to their roles within the school and candidates ability to evaluate the potential moral and legal consequences of decision-making in the school:
(ELCC 5.2, 5.4)
Prompt 17. What are the foundational principles of social justice? Why are the values of democracy, equity, and diversity paramount in public
schooling?
Assessment of candidate’s ability to understand and safeguard the values of democracy, equity, and diversity within the school and their ability to
promote social justice within the school to ensure that individual student needs inform all aspects of schooling: (ELCC 5.3, 5.5)
18
ELCC Standard 6.0: A building-level education leader applies knowledge that promotes the success of every student by understanding , responding
to and influencing the larger political, social, economic, legal, and cultural context through advocating for school students, families, and caregivers;
acting to influence local, district, state, and national decisions affecting student learning in a school environment; and anticipating and assessing
emerging trends and initiatives in order to adapt school-based leadership strategies.
Prompts 6.1, 6.2, and 6.3:
Prompt 18. Describe the major areas of inquiry that guide education law and provide key case law analysis for school policy making.
Assessment of candidate’s ability to understand and advocate for school, students, families, and caregivers: (ELCC 6.1)
Prompt 19. Discuss the current issues in education law with their policy solutions. How might these issues be communicated with school stakeholders for the
improvement of the school community?
Assessment of candidate’s ability to understand and act to influence local, district, state, and national decisions affecting student learning within the
school context as well as anticipate and assess emerging trends and initiatives in order to adapt school-based leadership strategies: (ELCC 6.2, 6.3)
19
Portfolio Scoring Rubric for Prompts
ASSESSMENT
TASKS
EXPECTATIONS
NOT MET
(0 POINTS)
EXPECTATIONS MINIMALLY
MET
(1 POINT)
MEETS
EXPECTATIONS
(2 POINTS)
ELCC Standard 1.1
Prompt 1
Ability to collaboratively
develop, articulate, and
steward a shared vision of
learning for a school.
************
Quality of narrative,
scholarly literature, and
Response indicated little to no
evidence of the ability to design
and support a collaborative
process for regarding developing,
articulating, implementation, and
stewarding a school vision.
Neither did it include a sufficient
description of the following areas:
collaborative school
visioning;
theories relevant to
building,
articulating,
implementing, and
stewarding a
school vision;
methods for
involving school
stakeholders in the
visioning process.
(1.1)
************
The narrative is of substandard
quality, lacking understanding
Response mentioned an
adequate description regarding
design and support of the
collaborative process for
developing, articulating,
implementation, and stewarding
a school vision. It also included
a sufficient description of two
of the following areas:
collaborative school visioning;
theories relevant to
building, articulating,
implementing, and
stewarding a school
vision;
methods for
involving school
stakeholders in the
visioning process.
(1.1)
************ The narrative is of sufficient
quality, including a reasonable
Response demonstrated a
complete and thorough
understanding and application
regarding the design and
support of a collaborative
process for developing,
articulating, and stewarding a
school vision. The response
also included a comprehensive
well-designed description of
the following areas:
collaborative school
visioning;
theories relevant to
building,
articulating,
implementing, and
stewarding a school
vision;
methods for
involving school
stakeholders in the
visioning process.
(1.1)
************
The narrative is of
exceptional quality, including
20
artifacts to support
standard element
of processes supporting the
development of a vision.
The narrative is supported with
little or (no scholarly literature
addressing the development of
a vision.
Insufficient artifacts are
referenced and presented in the
Appendix to support the
candidate’s ability to develop a
vision.
depth of understanding and
application of the processes
supporting the development of a
vision.
Sufficient scholarly literature
(more than one citation) is used
to support the candidate’s
discussion of the process of
vision development.
Appropriate artifacts are
referenced in the narrative and
presented in the Appendix to
support the candidate’s ability to
develop a vision.
The candidate discusses with
alacrity relevant knowledge.
in-depth understanding,
reflection, and application of
the school leader’s role in
developing a school vision.
An extensive amount of high-
quality scholarly literature is
used to support the
candidate’s discussion of
vision development.
A large array of high-quality
artifacts are referenced in the
narrative and presented in the
Appendix to support the
candidate’s ability to develop
a vision.
The candidate provides an
extraordinary discussion of
the relevant knowledge.
ELCC Standard 1.2
Prompt 2
Collect and use data to
identify school goals
Response indicated little to no
evidence of the ability to collect
and use data to identify school
goals, nor did it provide any
information regarding the
following:
the design and use of
assessment data for
learning;
organizational
effectiveness and
learning strategies; tactical and strategic
program planning;
implementation and
evaluation of school
improvement
Response mentioned a
description of how to collect
and use data to identify school
goals. Also, limited information
was provided in two of the
following areas:
the design and use of
assessment data for
learning;
organizational
effectiveness and
learning strategies; tactical and strategic program planning;
implementation and
evaluation of school
improvement
Response provided a
comprehensive and well-rounded
description of a plan of how to
collect and use data to identify
school goals. The response also
included a comprehensive
description of the three following
areas:
the design and use of
assessment data for
learning;
organizational
effectiveness and
learning strategies; tactical and strategic program planning;
implementation and
21
************
Quality of narrative,
scholarly literature,
artifacts, and research
strategies to support
standard element
processes;
variables that affect
student achievement. the design and use of
assessment data for
learning. (1.2)
*************
The narrative is of substandard
quality, lacking understanding of
the issues related to the
articulation of school variables
related to organizational
effectiveness and strategies for
data collection, data use and plan
development.
The narrative is supported with
little or no scholarly literature
addressing the articulation of
school variables related to
organizational effectiveness and
strategies for data collection,
data use and plan development
Insufficient artifacts are
referenced and presented in the
Appendix to support the
candidate’s ability to understand
school improvement processes.
The candidate does not identify
or discuss research strategies,
planning processes, or
communication elements.
processes;
variables that affect
student achievement. (1.2)
*************
The narrative is of sufficient
quality, including a reasonable
depth of understanding and
application of the issues specific
to school variables related to
organizational effectiveness and
strategies for data collection,
data use and plan development
Sufficient scholarly literature
(more than one citation) is used
to support the candidate’s
discussion of the issues related to
the articulation of school
variables related to
organizational effectiveness and
strategies for data collection,
data use and plan development
Appropriate artifacts are
referenced in the narrative and
presented in the Appendix to
support the candidate’s ability to
understand school improvement
processes.
The candidate both identifies and
appropriately discusses research
strategies, planning processes,
and some communication
elements.
evaluation of school
improvement
processes;
variables that affect
student achievement. (1.2)
************ The narrative is of exceptional
quality, including in-depth
understanding, reflection, and
application of the issues specific
to school variables related to
organizational effectiveness and
strategies for data collection,
data use and plan development
An extensive amount of high-
quality scholarly literature is
used to support the candidate’s
discussion of school variables
related to organizational
effectiveness and strategies for
data collection, data use and
plan development
A large array of high-quality
artifacts are referenced in the
narrative and presented in the
Appendix to support the
candidate’s ability to
understand school improvement
processes.
The candidate provides an
extraordinary discussion of
research strategies, planning
processes, and numerous
22
communication elements.
ELCC Standard 1.3
Prompt 3
Promotes continual
and sustainable
school improvement
************
Quality of narrative and artifacts
to support
Standard element
Response indicated little to no
evidence of the ability to promote
continuous and sustainable school
improvement, nor did it provide
any information regarding any of
the following:
continual and sustained
improvement models and
processes;
school change processes
for continual and
sustainable improvement;
role of professional
learning in continual and
sustainable school
improvement. (1.3)
************
The narrative is supported with
little or no scholarly literature
pertaining to continuous and
sustained improvement
Insufficient artifacts are
referenced and presented in the
Appendix to support the
candidate’s ability to promote
continuous and sustained
Response identified strategies
and practices that promote
continuous and sustainable
school improvement. It also
provided sufficient information
regarding two of the following:
continual and sustained
improvement models and
processes;
school change processes for
continual and sustainable
improvement;
role of professional learning
in continual and sustainable
school improvement. (1.3)
************
Sufficient scholarly literature
(more than one citation) is used
to support the candidate’s
discussion pertaining to
continuous and sustained
improvement
Appropriate artifacts are
referenced in the narrative and
presented in the Appendix to
support the candidate’s ability to
promote continuous and
Response provided a
comprehensive and well-rounded
description for identifying
strategies or practices to build
organizational capacity that
promote continuous and
sustainable school improvement.
The response also included a
comprehensive description of the
following areas:
continual and sustained
improvement models and
processes;
school change processes for
continual and sustainable
improvement;
role of professional
learning in continual and
sustainable school
improvement. (1.3)
************ An extensive amount of high-
quality scholarly literature
pertaining to continuous and
sustained improvement
A large array of high-quality
artifacts are referenced in the
narrative and presented in the
Appendix to support the
candidate’s ability to promote
continuous and sustained
improvement.
23
improvement. sustained improvement.
ELCC Standard 1. 4
Prompt 4
Evaluate school
progress and revise
school plans
supported by school
stakeholders
************
Quality of narrative,
scholarly literature, and
research strategies to
support standard element
Response indicated little to no
evidence of the ability to
evaluate school progress and
how to revise those plans
supported by school
stakeholders, nor did it provide
any information regarding the
following:
effective strategies for
monitoring the
implementation, revision
of plans to achieve school
improvement goals, and
program evaluation
models. (1.4)
************
The narrative is of
substandard quality, lacking
understanding of the various
processes to monitor and
evaluate improvement plans,
and how to communicate this
with stakeholders.
The narrative is supported
with little or no scholarly
literature addressing the
processes to monitor and
evaluate improvement plans,
and how to communicate this
with stakeholders.
Insufficient artifacts are
Response mentioned a
description of how to develop a
school plan to monitor program
development and
implementation of school goals.
Limited information was also
provided for the following:
effective strategies for
monitoring the
implementation, revision of
plans to achieve school
improvement goals, and
program evaluation models.
(1.4)
************
The narrative is of sufficient
quality, including a reasonable
depth of understanding and
application of the various
processes to monitor and
evaluate improvement plans,
and how to communicate this
with stakeholders.
Sufficient scholarly literature
(more than one citation) is used
to support the candidate’s
discussion the processes to
monitor and evaluate
improvement plans, and how to
communicate this with
Response provided a
comprehensive and well-rounded
description of a plan of how to
develop a school plan to monitor
program development and
implementation of school goals.
The response also included a
comprehensive well-rounded
description of the following:
effective strategies for
monitoring the
implementation, revision of
plans to achieve school
improvement goals, and
program evaluation models.
(1.4)
************
The narrative is of exceptional
quality, including in-depth
understanding, reflection, and
application of the various
processes to monitor and
evaluate improvement plans,
and how to communicate this
with stakeholders.
An extensive amount of high-
quality scholarly literature is
used to support the candidate’s
discussion of the processes to
monitor and evaluate
improvement plans, and how to
communicate this with
24
referenced and presented in
the Appendix to support the
candidate’s ability to monitor,
evaluate and communicate a
plan.
The candidate does not
identify or discuss the systems
for using data-based research
strategies to monitor and
evaluate an improvement
plan.
stakeholders.
Appropriate artifacts are
referenced in the narrative and
presented in the Appendix to
support the candidate’s ability to
monitor, evaluate and
communicate a plan.
The candidate both identifies
and appropriately discusses the
systems for using data-based
research strategies to monitor
and evaluate an improvement
plan.
stakeholders.
A large array of high-quality
artifacts are referenced in the
narrative and presented in the
Appendix to support the
candidate’s ability to monitor,
evaluate and communicate a
plan.
The candidate provides an
extraordinary discussion of the
systems for using data-based
research strategies to monitor
and evaluate an improvement
plan.
ASSESSMENT
TASKS
EXPECTATIONS
NOT MET
(0 POINTS)
EXPECTATIONS MINIMALLY
MET
(1 POINT)
MEETS
EXPECTATIONS
(2 POINTS)
ELCC Standard 2.1
Prompt 5
Sustain a school culture
and instructional
program
Response indicated little to no
evidence of the ability to promote
and sustain a school culture and
instructional program through
collaboration that promotes student
learning, nor did it provide any
information regarding the
following:
theories on human
development behavior,
personalized learning
environment, and
motivation;
school culture and ways it
can be influenced to ensure
student success. (2.1)
Response mentioned an adequate
description regarding how to
sustain a school culture through
collaboration that promotes
student learning. It also included
a sufficient description of one of
the following areas:
theories on human
development behavior,
personalized learning
environment, and motivation;
school culture and ways it
can be influenced to ensure
student success. (2.1)
************
The narrative is of sufficient quality,
Response provided a
comprehensive and well-rounded
description of the ability to
promote and sustain a school
culture that promotes student
learning. The response also
included a well-rounded
comprehensive description of all
of the following:
theories on human
development behavior,
personalized learning
environment, and
motivation;
school culture and ways it
can be influenced to
ensure student success.
25
************
Quality of narrative,
scholarly literature, and
artifacts to support
standard element
************ The narrative is of substandard
quality, lacking understanding of
school culture and its relationship
with the instructional program that
explains how a principal promotes
student success through
collaboration, trust, and a
personalized learning environment.
The narrative is supported with
little or no scholarly literature
addressing school culture and the
instructional program.
Insufficient artifacts are referenced
and presented in the Appendix to
support the candidate’s ability to
promote a positive school culture to
support the learning environment.
including a reasonable depth of
understanding and application of the
integration of school culture and the
instructional program that explains
how a principal promotes student
success through collaboration, trust,
and a personalized learning
environment.
Sufficient scholarly literature (more
than one citation) is used to support
the candidate’s discussion of school
culture and the instructional
program.
Appropriate artifacts are referenced
in the narrative and presented in the
Appendix to support the candidate’s
ability to promote a positive school
culture to support the learning
environment.
(2.1)
************
The narrative is of exceptional
quality, including in-depth
understanding, reflection, and
application of the integration of
school culture and the
instructional program that
explains how a principal promotes
student success through
collaboration, trust, and a
personalized learning
environment. .
An extensive amount of high-
quality scholarly literature is used
to support the candidate’s
discussion of school culture and
the instructional program.
A large array of high-quality
artifacts are referenced in the
narrative and presented in the
Appendix to support the
candidate’s ability to promote a
positive school culture to support
the learning environment.
ELCC Standard 2.2
Prompt 6
Create and evaluate a
comprehensive,
rigorous, and coherent
curricular and
instructional school
program
Response indicated little to no
evidence of understanding and
creation and evaluation of a
comprehensive, rigorous, and
coherent curricular program, nor
did it provide any information
regarding any of the following:
curriculum
development and
Response mentioned an adequate description
regarding how to
create and evaluate a
comprehensive,
rigorous, and coherent
curricular and
instructional school
program. It also included a
sufficient description of two of
the following areas:
Response provided a comprehensive
and well-rounded description of the
ability to create and evaluate a
comprehensive, rigorous, and
coherent curricular and
instructional school program. The
response also included a
well-rounded comprehensive
description of all of the following:
curriculum
26
*************
Quality of narrative,
artifacts, scholarly
literature, artifacts,
theory, and measures of
teacher performance
instructional
delivery theories;
measures of teacher
performance;
multiple methods of
evaluation, accountability
systems, data collection, and
analysis of evidence;
school technology and
information systems to
support and monitor student
learning (2.2)
************
The narrative is of substandard
quality, lacking understanding of
research-based practices for
creating and evaluating a
comprehensive, rigorous, and
coherent curricular and
instructional school program.
The narrative is supported with
little or no scholarly literature
addressing the improvement of
instruction through effective
curriculum design and evaluation.
Insufficient artifacts are referenced
curriculum
development and
instructional delivery
theories;
measures of teacher
performance;
multiple methods of evaluation,
accountability systems, data
collection, and analysis of
evidence;
school technology
and information
systems to support
and monitor
student (2.2)
************
The narrative is of sufficient quality,
including a reasonable depth of
research-based practices for creating
and evaluating a comprehensive,
rigorous, and coherent curricular and
instructional school program.
Sufficient scholarly literature (more
than one citation) is used to address
the improvement of instruction
through effective curriculum design
and evaluation.
Appropriate artifacts are referenced
in the narrative and presented in the
Appendix to support the candidate’s
ability to provide an effective
instructional program.
development and
instructional
delivery theories;
measures of teacher
performance;
multiple methods of
evaluation, accountability
systems, data collection, and
analysis of evidence;
school technology and
information systems to
support and monitor student. (2.2)
************
The narrative is of exceptional
quality, including in-depth
understanding, reflection, and
application of research-based
practices for creating and
evaluating a comprehensive,
rigorous, and coherent curricular
and instructional school program.
.
An extensive amount of high-
quality scholarly literature is used
to address the improvement of
instruction through effective
curriculum design and evaluation.
27
and presented in the Appendix to
support the candidate’s ability to
provide an effective instructional
program.
The candidate does not relate the
discussion to theory and measures
of teacher performance.
The candidate both identifies and
appropriately discusses theory, and
measures of teacher performance.
A large array of high-quality
artifacts are referenced in the
narrative and presented in the
Appendix to support the
candidate’s ability to provide an
effective instructional program.
The candidate provides an
extraordinary discussion of
theory, measures of teacher
performance, performance.
ELCC Standard 2.3
Prompt 7
Develop and supervise the
instructional and
leadership capacity of
school staff
*************
Quality of narrative,
artifacts, scholarly
literature, artifacts,
and research strategies.
Response indicated little to no
evidence of understanding how to
develop and supervise the
instructional and leadership
capacity of school staff, nor did it
provide any information regarding
any of the following:
high-quality professional
development for school staff
and leaders;
instructional leadership
practices;
leadership theory, change
processes, and evaluation;
standards for high-quality
teacher, principal, and
district practice. (2.3)
************
The narrative is of substandard
quality, lacking understanding of
strategies for the supervision of
instruction and leadership capacity.
The narrative is supported with
Response mentioned an adequate description
regarding how to
develop and supervise the
instructional and leadership
capacity of school staff. It also
included a sufficient description
of two of the following areas:
high-quality professional
development for school staff
and leaders;
instructional leadership practices;
leadership theory, change
processes, and evaluation;
standards for high-quality
teacher, principal, and
district practice. (2.3)
************
The narrative is of sufficient quality,
including a reasonable depth of
understanding and application of
strategies for the supervision of
instruction and leadership capacity.
Sufficient scholarly literature (more
than one citation) is used to support
Response provided a comprehensive
and well-rounded description of the
how to develop and supervise the
instructional and leadership
capacity of school staff. The
response also included a
well-rounded comprehensive
description of all of the following:
high-quality professional
development for school
staff and leaders;
instructional leadership
practices;
leadership theory, change
processes, and evaluation;
standards for high-quality
teacher, principal, and
district practice. (2.3)
************
The narrative is of exceptional
quality, including in-depth
understanding, reflection, and
application of strategies for the
28
little or no scholarly literature
pertaining to strategies for effective
supervision of instruction and
leadership capacity.
Insufficient artifacts are referenced
and presented in the Appendix to
support the candidate’s ability to
apply best practices for leading
instruction.
The candidate does not identify or
discuss appropriate research
strategies.
the candidate’s discussion pertaining
to strategies for effective supervision
of instruction and leadership
capacity.
Appropriate artifacts are referenced
in the narrative and presented in the
Appendix to support the candidate’s
ability to apply best practices for
leading instruction.
The candidate both identifies and
appropriately discusses appropriate
research strategies.
supervision of instruction and
leadership capacity.
An extensive amount of high-
quality scholarly literature
pertaining to strategies for
effective supervision of
instruction and leadership
capacity.
A large array of high-quality
artifacts are referenced in the
narrative and presented in the
Appendix to support the
candidate’s ability to apply best
practices for leading instruction.
The candidate provides an
extraordinary discussion of
appropriate research strategies.
ELCC Standard 2.4
Prompt 8
Promote the most
effective and
appropriate
technologies to
support teaching and
learning in a school
environment
Response indicated little to no
evidence of how to promote the
most effective and appropriate
technologies to support teaching
and learning in a school
environment, nor did it provide any
information regarding any of the following:
technology and its uses for
instruction within the
school;
infrastructures for the
ongoing support, review,
and planning of
instructional technology.
(2.4)
Response mentioned an adequate description
regarding how to
promote the most effective and appropriate
technologies to
support teaching and learning
in a school environment. It also
included a sufficient description
of the two following areas:
technology and its uses for
instruction within the
school;
infrastructures for the
ongoing support, review, and
planning of instructional
technology. (2.4)
Response provided a comprehensive
and well-rounded description of how
to promote the most effective and
appropriate technologies to
support teaching and learning in a
school environment. The response
also included a well-rounded
comprehensive description of all
of the following:
technology and its uses
for instruction within the
school;
infrastructures for the
ongoing support, review,
and planning of
instructional technology.
29
************
Quality of narrative,
scholarly literature, and
artifacts
************
The narrative is of substandard
quality, lacking understanding of
strategies for technology use for
improved instruction.
The narrative is supported with
little or no scholarly literature
pertaining to technology strategies
for leading effective instruction.
Insufficient artifacts are referenced
and presented in the Appendix to
support the candidate’s ability to
apply best practices of technology
use to support teaching and student
learning.
************
The narrative is of sufficient quality,
including a reasonable depth of
understanding and application of
strategies for technology use for
improved instruction.
Sufficient scholarly literature (more
than one citation) is used to support
the candidate’s discussion pertaining
to technology strategies for leading
effective instruction.
Appropriate artifacts are referenced
in the narrative and presented in the
Appendix to support the candidate’s
ability to apply best practices of
technology use to support teaching
and student learning.
(2.4)
************
The narrative is of exceptional
quality, including in-depth
understanding, reflection, and
application of strategies for
technology use for improved
instruction
An extensive amount of high-
quality scholarly literature
pertaining to technology strategies
for leading effective instruction.
A large array of high-quality
artifacts are referenced in the
narrative and presented in the
Appendix to support the
candidate’s ability to apply best
practices of technology use to
support teaching and student
learning.
ELCC Standard 3.1
Prompt 9
Monitor and evaluate
school management and
operational systems
Response indicated little to no
evidence of how to monitor and
evaluate school management
and operational systems, nor did it
provide any information regarding
following:
school management of
organizational, operational,
and legal resources;
school management of
marketing and public
relations functions. (3.1)
Response mentioned an adequate description
regarding how to
monitor and evaluate school management and
operational
systems. It also included a
sufficient description of the two
following areas:
school management of
organizational, operational,
and legal resources;
school management of
marketing and public
relations functions.
(3.1)
Response provided a comprehensive
and well-rounded description of how
to monitor and evaluate school
management and operational
systems. The response also included
a well-rounded comprehensive
description of all of the following:
school management of
organizational,
operational, and legal
resources;
school management of marketing
and public relations functions.
(3.1)
30
************
Quality of narrative,
best-practice literature,
and artifacts
************
The narrative is of substandard
quality, lacking understanding of
organizational planning and the
connection to equity, effectiveness,
and efficiency.
The narrative is supported with
little or no best practices literature
addressing organizational
management.
Insufficient artifacts are referenced
and presented in the Appendix to
support the candidate’s ability to
manage the organization.
**********
The narrative is of sufficient quality,
including a reasonable depth of
understanding and application of
organizational planning and the
connection to equity, effectiveness,
and efficiency.
Sufficient best practices literature
(more than one citation) is used to
support the candidate’s discussion of
organizational management.
Appropriate artifacts are referenced
in the narrative and presented in the
Appendix to support the candidate’s
ability to manage the organization.
************
The narrative is of exceptional
quality, including in-depth
understanding, reflection, and
application of organizational
planning and the connection to
equity, effectiveness, and
efficiency.
An extensive amount of high-
quality best practices literature is
used to support the candidate’s
discussion of organizational
management.
A large array of high-quality
artifacts are referenced in the
narrative and presented in the
Appendix to support the
candidate’s ability to manage the
organization.
ELCC Standard 3.2
Prompt 10 (Part 1)
Use of human,
fiscal, and technological resources
to manage
school operations
Response had little to no description
for efficiently using human, fiscal,
and technology resources within the
district to improve student learning.
Neither did the response include a
sufficient description of the
following areas:
methods and procedures for
managing school resources,
including the strategic
management of human
capital, school operations,
and school facilities;
alignment of resources to
Response mentioned an adequate
description for efficiently using
human, fiscal, and technology
resources within the school to
improve student learning.
Response also included a
sufficient description of two of
the following areas:
methods and procedures for
managing school resources,
including the strategic
management of human
capital, school operations,
and school facilities;
Response provided a
comprehensive and well-rounded
description for efficiently using
human, fiscal, and technology
resources within the school to
improve student learning.
Response also included a
comprehensive description of the
following areas:
methods and procedures
for managing school
resources, including the
strategic management of
human capital, school
31
************
Quality of narrative,
best-practice literature,
and artifacts
and forecasting resource
requirements for the school; technology and management
systems.. (3.2)
************
The narrative is of substandard
quality, lacking understanding of
operations and fiscal management.
The narrative is supported with
little or no best practices literature
addressing operations and fiscal
management
Insufficient artifacts are referenced
and presented in the Appendix to
support the candidate’s ability to
manage school operations.
alignment of resources to and
forecasting
resource requirements for the
school; technology and management
systems. (3.2)
**********
The narrative is of sufficient quality,
including a reasonable depth of
understanding and application of
operations and fiscal management.
Sufficient best practices literature
(more than one citation) is used to
support the candidate’s discussion of
operations and fiscal management.
Appropriate artifacts are referenced
in the narrative and presented in the
Appendix to support the candidate’s
ability to manage operations.
operations, and school
facilities;
alignment of resources to
and forecasting resource
requirements for the
school; technology and management
systems. (3.2)
************
The narrative is of exceptional
quality, including in-depth
understanding, reflection, and
application of operations and
fiscal management.
An extensive amount of high-
quality best practices literature is
used to support the candidate’s
discussion of operations and fiscal
management.
A large array of high-quality
artifacts are referenced in the
narrative and presented in the
Appendix to support the
candidate’s ability to manage
operations.
ELCC Standard 3.3
Prompt 10 (Part 2)
Protecting the welfare
and safety of student
and staff
Response provided an insufficient
description for promoting school-
based policies and procedures for
protecting the welfare and safety of
students and staff in the school and
did not include the following:
Response mentioned an adequate
description for promoting school-
based policies and procedures for
protecting the welfare and safety
of students and staff in the school.
Response also included a
Response provided a
comprehensive and well-rounded
description for promoting school-
based policies and procedures for
protecting the welfare and safety
of student and staff in the school,
32
************
Quality of narrative,
best-practice literature,
and artifacts
school strategies supporting
safe and secure learning
environments including
prevention, crisis
management, and public
relations;
school strategies supporting
student development of
self-management, civic
literacy, and positive
leadership skills; school-based discipline
management policies and plans (3.3)
**********
The narrative is of substandard
quality, lacking understanding of
operations and fiscal management
and its alignment to the welfare of
students and staff.
The narrative is supported with
little or no best practices literature
addressing operations and fiscal
management.
Insufficient artifacts are referenced
and presented in the Appendix to
support the candidate’s ability to
manage school operations for the
welfare of students and staff.
sufficient description of one of
the following areas:
school strategies supporting
safe and secure learning
environments including
prevention, crisis
management, and public
relations;
school strategies supporting
student development of self-
management, civic literacy,
and positive leadership
skills; school-based discipline
management policies and plans (3.3)
************
The narrative is of sufficient quality,
including a reasonable depth of
understanding and application of
operations and fiscal management
and its alignment to the welfare of
students and staff.
Sufficient best practices literature
(more than one citation) is used to
support the candidate’s discussion of
operations and fiscal management.
Appropriate artifacts are referenced
in the narrative and presented in the
Appendix to support the candidate’s
ability to manage operations for the
welfare of students and staff.
plus a well-defined description of
the following areas:
school strategies
supporting safe and secure
learning environments
including prevention,
crisis management, and
public relations;
school strategies
supporting student
development of self-
management, civic
literacy, and positive
leadership skills; school-based discipline
management policies and plans (3.3)
************
The narrative is of exceptional
quality, including in-depth
understanding, reflection, and
application of operations and
fiscal management and its
alignment to the welfare of
students and staff.
An extensive amount of high-
quality best practices literature is
used to support the candidate’s
discussion of operations and fiscal
management.
33
A large array of high-quality
artifacts are referenced in the
narrative and presented in the
Appendix to support the
candidate’s ability to manage
operations for the welfare of
students and staff.
ELCC Standard 3.4
Prompt 11 (Part 1)
Develop school capacity
for distributed leadership
************
Quality of narrative,
best-practice literature,
and artifacts
Response had little to no
description how to develop school
capacity for distributed leadership,
nor did the response provide any
information regarding the
following:
the meaning of distributed leadership in a school environment and how to create and sustain it. (3.4)
************
The narrative is supported with
little or no best practices literature
addressing distributed leadership.
Insufficient artifacts are
referenced and presented in the
Appendix to support the
candidate’s ability to develop
school capacity to distribute
leadership.
Response mentioned an adequate description
for how to develop
distributed leadership and also
adequate information was
provided for the following
areas:
the meaning of distributed leadership in a school environment and how to create and sustain it.. (3.4)
************
The narrative is of sufficient quality,
including a reasonable depth of
understanding of distributed
leadership.
Sufficient best practices literature
(more than one citation) is used to
support the candidate’s discussion of
distributed leadership.
Appropriate artifacts are referenced
in the narrative and presented in the
Appendix to support the candidate’s
ability to develop school capacity to
distribute leadership.
Response provided a comprehensive
and well-rounded description for
how to develop distributed
leadership and detailed and
comprehensive evidence was
provided for the following:
the meaning of distributed leadership in a school environment and how to create and sustain it.. (3.4)
************
The narrative is of exceptional
quality, including in-depth
understanding, reflection, and
application of distributed
leadership.
An extensive amount of high-
quality best practices literature is
used to support the candidate’s
discussion of distributed
leadership.
A large array of high-quality
artifacts are referenced in the
narrative and presented in the
Appendix to support the
candidate’s ability to develop
34
school capacity to distribute
leadership.
ELCC Standard 3.5
Prompt 11 (Part 2)
Ensure that teacher and
organizational time
focuses on supporting
high-quality school
instruction and student
learning.
************
Quality of narrative,
best-practice literature,
and artifacts
Response had little to no
description how to ensure that
teacher and organizational time
focuses on supporting
high-quality school instruction
and student learning, nor did the response provided any information
regarding the following:
supervision strategies that
ensure that teachers
maximize time spent on
high- quality instruction
and student learning; management theories on
effective school time, priorities, and schedules. (3.5)
************
The narrative is of substandard
quality, lacking understanding of
distributed leadership that is
aligned to teaching and learning.
The narrative is supported with
little or no best practices literature
addressing distributed leadership
for improved instruction.
Insufficient artifacts are
referenced and presented in the
Appendix to support the
candidate’s ability to develop
school capacity to distribute
Response identified strategies
and practices how to ensure that teacher and
organizational
time focuses on supporting
high-quality school instruction and and
student learning. The
response also included a
sufficient description of one
of the following areas:
supervision strategies that
ensure that teachers
maximize time spent on
high- quality instruction and
student learning; management theories on
effective school time, priorities, and schedules. (3.5)
************
The narrative is of sufficient quality,
including a reasonable depth of
understanding of distributed
leadership that is aligned to teaching
and learning.
Sufficient best practices literature
(more than one citation) is used to
support the candidate’s discussion of
distributed leadership for improved
instruction.
Appropriate artifacts are
referenced in the narrative and
presented in the Appendix to
support the candidate’s ability to
develop school capacity to
Response provided a comprehensive
and well-rounded description how
to ensure that teacher and
organizational time focuses on
supporting high-quality school
instruction and student learning.
In addition a well-defined
comprehensive description of the
following areas were also
provided:
supervision strategies that
ensure that teachers
maximize time spent on
high- quality instruction
and student learning; management theories on
effective school time, priorities, and schedules.
(3.5)
************
The narrative is of exceptional
quality, including in-depth
understanding, reflection, and
application of distributed
leadership that is aligned to
teaching and learning.
An extensive amount of high-
quality best practices literature is
used to support the candidate’s
discussion of distributed
leadership for improved
instruction.
A large array of high-quality
35
leadership; and to ensure
teacher and organizational time
focuses on supporting high-
quality school instruction and
student learning.
distribute leadership; and to
ensure teacher and organizational
time focuses on supporting high-
quality school instruction and
student learning.
artifacts are referenced in the
narrative and presented in the
Appendix to support the
candidate’s ability to develop
school capacity to distribute
leadership; and to ensure teacher
and organizational time focuses
on supporting high-quality school
instruction and student learning.
ELCC Standard 4.1
Prompt 12
Collaborate with faculty
and community
members
************
Response had little to no
description how to collaborate
with faculty and community
r egarding information pertinent
to the improvement of the school’s
educational environment, nor did
the response address the following
collaboration and
communication
techniques to improve
the school’s educational
environment; information pertinent to the
school’s educational environment. (4.1)
************
The narrative is of substandard
quality, lacking demonstration of
Response also identified
strategies and practices how to collaborate
with faculty and
community r ega rding
information pertinent to the improvement of
the school’s
educational environment. The
response also included a
sufficient description of one
of the following areas:
collaboration and
communication
techniques to improve
the school’s educational
environment; information pertinent to the
school’s educational environment. (4.1)
************
The narrative is of sufficient quality,
including a reasonable
demonstration and application of
Response provided a comprehensive
and well-rounded description how
to collaborate with faculty and
community members by
collecting and analyzing
information pertinent to the
improvement of the school’s
educational environment. In
addition, a well-defined
comprehensive description of the
following areas were also provided:
collaboration and
communication
techniques to improve
the school’s
educational
environment; information pertinent to the
school’s educational environment. (4.1)
************
The narrative is of exceptional
quality, including extraordinary
36
Quality of narrative,
scholarly literature,
artifacts, and research
based knowledge
bringing together the resources of
faculty and the community to
positively affect student learning.
The narrative is supported with
little or no scholarly literature
addressing collaboration with
stakeholders and other community
members.
Insufficient artifacts are referenced
and presented in the Appendix to
support the candidate’s ability to
collaborate with faculty and
community.
The candidate does not
demonstrate the ability to use
public information and research-
based knowledge of issues and
trends to collaborate with faculty
and community members.
bringing together the resources of
faculty and the community to
positively affect student learning.
Sufficient scholarly literature (more
than one citation) is used to support
the candidate’s discussion of
collaboration with stakeholders and
other community members.
Appropriate artifacts are referenced
in the narrative and presented in the
Appendix to support the candidate’s
ability to collaborate with faculty
and community.
The candidate provides clear
evidence of his/her ability to use
public information and research-
based knowledge of issues and
trends to collaborate with faculty and
community members.
demonstration and application of
bringing together the resources of
faculty and the community to
positively affect student learning.
An extensive amount of high-
quality best practices literature is
used to support the candidate’s
discussion of collaboration with
stakeholders and other community
members.
A large array of high-quality
artifacts are referenced in the
narrative and presented in the
Appendix to support the
candidate’s ability to collaborate
with faculty and community.
The candidate provides
substantial evidence of his/her
ability to use public information
and research-based knowledge of
issues and trends to collaborate
with faculty and community
members.
ELCC Standard 4.2
Prompt 13
Mobilize Community
Resources
Response had little to no
description how to mobilize
community resources, by
promoting an understanding,
appreciation, and use of the
diverse cultural, social, and
intellectual resources within the
school community, nor did the
response address the following:
identify and mobilize effective
Response mentioned an adequate
understanding of how to
mobilize community resources
by promoting an
understanding, appreciation,
and use of the diverse cultural, social, and
intellectual
resources within the school community.
The response also addressed an adequate
description for one of the
following:
Response provided a comprehensive
and well-rounded description how
to mobilize community resources
by promoting an understanding,
appreciation, and use of the
diverse cultural, social, and
intellectual resources within the
school community and a
comprehensive and complete
response of the following:
37
************
Quality of narrative,
scholarly literature,
artifacts, assessment
strategies and research
based knowledge and
methods
community resources;
school-based cultural
competence;
diverse cultural, social, and
intellectual community
resources. (4.2)
************
The narrative is of substandard
quality, lacking candidate
demonstration of the types of
resources within the larger school
environment that school leaders
can mobilize to enhance learning
opportunities for all students.
The narrative is supported with
little or no scholarly literature
addressing the types of resources
within the larger school
environment that school leaders
can mobilize to enhance learning
opportunities for all students.
Insufficient artifacts are
referenced and presented in the
Appendix to support the
candidate’s ability to respond to
community interests and needs;
and to describe and identify the
types of resources within the
larger school environment that
school leaders can mobilize to
identify and mobilize effective
community resources;
school-based cultural
competence;
diverse cultural, social, and
intellectual community
resources (4.2)
*************
The narrative is of sufficient
quality, including a reasonable
demonstration and application of
the types of resources within the
larger school environment that
school leaders can mobilize to
enhance learning opportunities for
all students.
Sufficient scholarly literature (more
than one citation) is used to support
the candidate’s discussion of the
types of resources within the larger
school environment that school
leaders can mobilize to enhance
learning opportunities for all
students. Appropriate artifacts are
referenced in the narrative and
presented in the Appendix to
support the candidate’s ability to
respond to community interests and
needs: and to describe and identify
the types of resources within the
larger school environment that
identify and mobilize
effective community
resources;
school-based cultural
competence;
diverse cultural, social, and
intellectual community
resources. (4.2)
************
The narrative is of exceptional
quality, including extraordinary
demonstration and application
of the types of resources within
the larger school environment
that school leaders can mobilize
to enhance learning
opportunities for all students. .
An extensive amount of high-
quality best practices literature
is used to support the
candidate’s discussion of the
types of resources within the
larger school environment that
school leaders can mobilize to
enhance learning opportunities
for all students.
A large array of high-quality
artifacts are referenced in the
narrative and presented in the
Appendix to support the
candidate’s ability to respond to
38
enhance learning opportunities for
all students.
The candidate does not discuss the
use of appropriate assessment
strategies and research methods to
understand and accommodate
diverse school and community
conditions and dynamics.
school leaders can mobilize to
enhance learning opportunities for
all students.
The candidate properly discusses
the use of appropriate assessment
strategies and research methods to
understand and accommodate
diverse school and community
conditions and dynamics.
community interests and needs;
and to describe and identify the
types of resources within the
larger school environment that
school leaders can mobilize to
enhance learning opportunities
for all students.
The candidate provides an
exceptional discussion of
appropriate assessment strategies
and research methods to
understand and accommodate
diverse school and community
conditions and dynamics.
ELCC Standard 4.3
Prompt 14 (Part 1)
Respond to community
interests and needs by
building and sustaining
positive school
relationships with
families and caregivers
Response had little to no
description how to understand and
respond to community interests and needs
needs by building and sustaining
positive school relationships,
nor did the response address any of thes,
the following:
the needs of
students, parents or
caregivers;
school organizational
culture that promotes
open communication
with families and
caregivers;
school strategies for
effective oral and written
communication with
families and caregivers;
approaches to collaboration
Response mentioned an adequate
understanding of how to
respond to community
interests and needs by
building and sustaining
positive school relationships.
The response also mentioned
adequate information for two of
the following:
the needs of
students, parents or
caregivers;
school organizational
culture that promotes
open communication with
families and caregivers;
school strategies for
effective oral and written
communication with
families and caregivers;
Response provided a comprehensive
and well-rounded description how
to understand and how to respond to
community interests and needs
by building and sustaining
positive school relationships. The
response also provided a
comprehensive well-rounded
description of the following:
the needs of
students, parents or
caregivers;
school organizational
culture that promotes
open communication
with families and
caregivers;
school strategies for
effective oral and written
communication with
39
************
Quality of narrative,
Scholarly literature, and
artifacts
with families and
caregivers. (4.3)
************
The narrative is of substandard
quality, lacking understanding of
the utilization of families and
various partners.
The narrative is supported with
little or no scholarly literature
addressing the inclusion of families
and communities in schools.
Insufficient artifacts are referenced
and presented in the Appendix to
support the candidate’s ability to
involve families and communities
approaches to collaboration
with families and caregivers.
(4.3)
************
The narrative is of sufficient quality,
including a reasonable depth of
understanding of the utilization of
families and various community
partners.
Sufficient scholarly literature (more
than one citation) is used to support
the candidate’s discussion of the
inclusion of families and
communities in schools.
Multiple artifacts are referenced in
the narrative and presented in the
Appendix to support the candidate’s
ability to involve families and
communities.
families and caregivers;
approaches to
collaboration with
families and caregivers.
(4.3)
*************
The narrative is of exceptional
quality, including in-depth
understanding, reflection, and
application of the utilization of
families and various community
partners.
An extensive amount of high-
quality scholarly literature is used
to support the candidate’s
discussion of the inclusion of
families and communities in
schools.
An extraordinarily large array of
artifacts are referenced in the
narrative and presented in the
Appendix to involve families and
communities.
ELCC Standard 4.4
Prompt 14 (Part 2)
Responding to
community interests
Response had little to no
description how to respond to
community interests and needs by
building and sustaining productive
school relationships with
Response provided an adequate
understanding of how to
respond to community interests
and needs by building and
sustaining productive school relationships
Response provided a comprehensive
and well-rounded description and
understanding of how to respond to
community interests and needs by
building and sustaining productive
40
and needs by building
and sustaining
productive school relationships
with
community partners
************
Quality of narrative,
scholarly literature, and
artifacts
community partners, nor did the response
address any of the following areas:
the needs of school
community partners;
school organizational
culture that promotes
open communication
with community
partners;
school strategies for effective
oral and written communication with
community partners;
collaboration methods to
develop and sustain
productive relationships
with community
partners. (4.4)
************
The narrative is of substandard
quality, lacking understanding of
the utilization of families and
various partners.
The narrative is supported with
little or no scholarly literature
addressing the inclusion of families
and communities in schools.
Insufficient artifacts are referenced
and presented in the Appendix to
support the candidate’s ability to
involve families and communities.
with community
partners. Adequate information
was provided for two of the
following:
the needs of school
community partners;
school organizational
culture that promotes
open communication with
community partners;
school strategies for effective
oral and written communication with
community partners;
collaboration methods to
develop and sustain
productive relationships
with community partners.
(4.4)
************
The narrative is of sufficient quality,
including a reasonable depth of
understanding of the utilization of
families and various community
partners.
Sufficient scholarly literature (more
than one citation) is used to support
the candidate’s discussion of the
inclusion of families and
communities in schools.
Multiple artifacts are referenced in
the narrative and presented in the
Appendix to support the candidate’s
ability to involve families and
communities.
school relationships with community
partners. The response also
provided a comprehensive
well-rounded description of the
following:
the needs of school
community partners;
school organizational
culture that promotes
open communication
with community
partners;
school strategies for effective oral and written communication with
community partners;
collaboration methods
to develop and sustain
productive
relationships with
community partners.
(4.4)
************
The narrative is of exceptional
quality, including in-depth
understanding, reflection, and
application of the utilization of
families and various community
partners.
An extensive amount of high-
quality scholarly literature is used
to support the candidate’s
discussion of the inclusion of
families and communities in
schools.
41
An extraordinarily large array of
artifacts are referenced in the
narrative and presented in the
Appendix to involve families and
communities.
ELCC Standard 5.1
Prompt 15
Act with integrity and
fairness to ensure a
school system of
accountability for every
student’s academic and
social success
************
Quality of narrative,
scholarly literature, and
artifacts
Response had little to no
description how to act with
integrity and fairness to ensure a
school system of accountability for
every student’s academic and
social success, nor did the
response address any of the
following areas:
practices demonstrating principles of integrity and fairness;
federal, state, and local legal and policy guidelines that creates operational
definitions of accountability, equity, and social justice. (5.1)
************
The narrative is of substandard
quality, lacking the understanding
of integrity and what fairness
means.
The narrative is supported with
little or no scholarly literature
addressing integrity and the
meanings of fairness.
Insufficient artifacts are referenced
Response provided an adequate
understanding and description
of how to act with integrity and
fairness to ensure a school
system of accountability for
every student’s academic and
social success. Adequate
information was provided for
one of the following:
practices demonstrating principles of integrity and
fairness; federal, state, and local legal
and policy guidelines that
creates operational definitions of accountability, equity,
and social justice. (5.1)
************
The narrative is of sufficient quality,
including a general understanding of
what integrity means and what
fairness means.
Sufficient scholarly literature (more
than one citation) is used to support
the candidate’s discussion of
integrity and the meanings of
fairness.
Multiple artifacts are referenced in
Response provided a comprehensive
and well-rounded description and
understanding of how to act with
integrity and fairness to ensure a
school system of accountability for
every student’s academic and
social success. The response also
provided a comprehensive
well-rounded description of the
following:
practices demonstrating
principles of integrity and fairness;
federal, state, and local legal
and policy guidelines that creates operational
definitions of
accountability, equity, and social justice. (5.1)
************
The narrative is of exceptional
quality, including in-depth
understanding, reflection, and
analysis of what integrity means
and what fairness means.
An extensive amount of high-
quality scholarly literature is used
to support the candidate’s
discussion of integrity and the
42
and presented in the Appendix to
support the candidate’s ability to
understand and act with integrity
and highlight the different
meanings of fairness.
the narrative and presented in the
Appendix to support the candidate’s
ability to understand and act with
integrity and highlight the different
meanings of fairness.
meanings of fairness.
An extraordinarily large array of
artifacts are referenced in the
narrative and presented in the
Appendix to support the
candidate’s ability to understand
and act with integrity and
highlights the different meanings
of fairness.
ELCC Standard 5.2
Prompt 16 (part 1)
Understands and can
model principles of self-
awareness, reflective
practice, transparency,
and ethical behavior as
related to their roles
within the school
*************
Quality of narrative,
scholarly literature, and
artifacts
Response had little to no
description how model principles
of self- awareness, reflective
practice, transparency, and ethical behavior
as related to their roles
within the school; neither did the
response include a sufficient
description of the following
areas:
the basic principles of ethical
behavior established
by legal and professional organizations;
the relationship between ethical behavior, school culture, and student
achievement; the effect of ethical behavior
on one’s own leadership. (5.2)
************
The narrative is of substandard
quality, lacking the understanding
of commonly recognized ethical
reference points for decision
Response mentioned an adequate description
for modeling
principles of self- awareness,
reflective practice,
transparency, and ethical
behavior as related to their
roles within the school. Adequate
information was provided for
one of the following:
the basic principles of ethical
behavior established
by legal and professional organizations;
the relationship between ethical behavior, school culture, and student achievement;
the effect of ethical behavior on one’s own leadership. (5.2)
************
The narrative is of sufficient quality,
including a general understanding of
commonly recognized ethical
reference points for decision making.
Sufficient scholarly literature (more
than one citation) is used to support
the candidate’s discussion of ethical
Response provided a comprehensive
and well-rounded description and
understanding of modeling
principles of self- awareness,
reflective practice, transparency,
and ethical behavior as related
to their roles within the school.
The response also provided a
comprehensive well-rounded
description of the following:
the basic principles of ethical behavior established
by legal and professional
organizations; the relationship between
ethical behavior, school
culture, and student achievement;
the effect of ethical behavior
on one’s own leadership. (5.2)
************
The narrative is of exceptional
quality, including in-depth
understanding, reflection, and
43
making.
The narrative is supported with
little or no scholarly literature
addressing ethical decision making.
Insufficient artifacts are referenced
and presented in the Appendix to
support the candidate’s ability to
engage in reflective ethical
decision making.
decision making.
Multiple artifacts are referenced in
the narrative and presented in the
Appendix to support the candidate’s
ability to engage in reflective ethical
decision making.
analytical application of
commonly recognized ethical
reference points for decision
making.
An extensive amount of high-
quality scholarly literature is used
to support the candidate’s
discussion of ethical decision
making.
An extraordinarily large array of
artifacts are referenced in the
narrative and presented in the
Appendix to support the
candidate’s ability to engage in
reflective ethical decision making.
ELCC Standard 5.4
Prompt 16 (Part 2)
Understands and can
evaluate the potential
moral and legal
consequences of decision
making in the school
************
Quality of narrative,
Response had little to no
description regarding the
understanding and evaluating of the
potential moral and legal
consequences of decision
making in the school, nor was any response
provided for the
following:
moral and legal
consequences of
decision making in
schools;
strategies to prevent
difficulties related to
moral and legal issues. (5.4)
************
The narrative is of substandard
Response provided an adequate
understanding and description
of how to evaluate the potential
moral and legal consequences
of decision making in the school.
Adequate information was
provided for one of the
following:
moral and legal
consequences of
decision making in
schools;
strategies to prevent
difficulties related to
moral and legal issues.
(5.4)
Response provided a comprehensive
and well-rounded description and
understanding evaluating the
potential moral and legal
consequences of decision
making in the school. The response
also provided a comprehensive
well-rounded description of the
following:
moral and legal
consequences of
decision making in
schools;
strategies to prevent
difficulties related to
moral and legal
issues. (5.4)
************
The narrative is of exceptional
44
scholarly literature,
artifacts, and reflection
on systems or paradigms
quality, lacking the understanding
of commonly recognized ethical
reference points for decision
making.
The narrative is supported with
little or no scholarly literature
addressing ethical decision making.
Insufficient artifacts are referenced
and presented in the Appendix to
support the candidate’s ability to
engage in reflective ethical
decision making.
The candidate does not effectively
discuss how they are aided by
knowing and reflecting on systems
or “paradigms” when interacting
with others.
The narrative is of sufficient quality,
including a general understanding of
commonly recognized ethical
reference points for decision making.
Sufficient scholarly literature (more
than one citation) is used to support
the candidate’s discussion of ethical
decision making.
Multiple artifacts are referenced in
the narrative and presented in the
Appendix to support the candidate’s
ability to engage in reflective ethical
decision making.
The candidate effectively discusses
how they are aided by knowing and
reflecting on systems or “paradigms”
when interacting with others.
quality, including in-depth
understanding, reflection, and
analytical application of
commonly recognized ethical
reference points for decision
making.
An extensive amount of high-
quality scholarly literature is used
to support the candidate’s
discussion of ethical decision
making.
An extraordinarily large array of
artifacts are referenced in the
narrative and presented in the
Appendix to support the
candidate’s ability to engage in
reflective ethical decision making.
The candidate includes a
thorough discussion of how they
are aided by knowing and
reflecting on systems or
“paradigms” when interacting
with others.
ELCC Standard 5.3
Prompt 17 (Part 1)
Understands and can
safeguard the values of
democracy, equity, and
diversity
************
Quality of narrative,
scholarly literature, and
artifacts
Response had little to no
description regarding the
understanding and safeguarding of
democracy, equity, and diversity.,
nor did the response address the
following areas: (5.3)
************
The narrative is of substandard
quality, lacking the understanding
of 1) values of democracy, 2)
Response provided an adequate
description and understanding
of how to safeguard the values of democracy,
equity, and
diversity. (5.3)
************
The narrative is of sufficient quality,
including a general understanding of
1) values of democracy, 2) equity,
Response provided a comprehensive
and well-rounded description and
understanding of safeguarding
the values of democracy, equity,
and diversity. (5.3)
************
The narrative is of exceptional
quality, including in-depth
understanding, reflection, and
45
equity, and 3) the basis for
diversity.
The narrative is supported with
little or no scholarly literature.
Insufficient artifacts are referenced
and presented in the Appendix to
support the candidate’s ability to
understand and engage with issues
of 1) values of democracy, 2)
equity, and 3) diversity
and 3) the basis for diversity.
Sufficient scholarly literature (more
than one citation) is used to support
the candidate’s discussion.
Multiple artifacts are referenced in
the narrative and presented in the
Appendix to support the candidate’s
ability to understand and engage
with issues of 1) values of
democracy, 2) equity, and 3)
diversity.
analysis of 1) values of
democracy, 2) equity, and 3) the
basis for diversity.
An extensive amount of high-
quality scholarly literature is used
to support the candidate’s
discussion.
An extraordinarily large array of
artifacts are referenced in the
narrative and presented in the
Appendix to support the
candidate’s ability to understand
and engage with issues of 1)
values of democracy, 2) equity,
and 3) diversity.
ELCC Standard 5.5
Prompt 17 (Part2)
Understands and can
promote social justice
within a school to ensure
that individual student
needs inform all aspects
of schooling
**********
Quality of narrative,
scholarly literature, and
Response had little to no
description regarding the
understanding and promoting of
social justice within a school to
ensure that individual student
needs inform all aspects of
schooling, nor did the response
address the following areas:
the relationship between
social justice, school
culture, and student
achievement;
theories of efficacy. (5.5)
************
The narrative is of substandard
quality, lacking the understanding
Response provided an adequate
description and understanding
of how to promote social justice
within a school to ensure
that individual student
needs inform all aspects
of schooling. Adequate
information was provided for
one of the following areas:
the relationship between
social justice, school culture,
and student achievement;
theories of efficacy. (5.5)
************
The narrative is of sufficient quality,
including a general understanding of
social justice.
Sufficient scholarly literature (more
Response provided a comprehensive
and well-rounded description and
understanding of promoting
social justice within a school to
ensure that individual student
needs inform all aspects of
schooling. The response also
provided a comprehensive
well-rounded description of the
following areas:
the relationship between
social justice, school
culture, and student
achievement;
theories of efficacy. (5.5)
************
The narrative is of exceptional
quality, including in-depth
46
artifacts
of social justice.
The narrative is supported with
little or no scholarly literature.
Insufficient artifacts are referenced
and presented in the Appendix to
support the candidate’s ability to
understand social justice.
than one citation) is used to support
the candidate’s discussion.
Multiple artifacts are referenced in
the narrative and presented in the
Appendix to support the candidate’s
ability to understand and engage
with issues of social justice.
understanding, reflection, and
analysis of social justice.
An extensive amount of high-
quality scholarly literature is used
to support the candidate’s
discussion.
An extraordinarily large array of
artifacts are referenced in the
narrative and presented in the
Appendix to support the
candidate’s ability to understand
and engage with issues of social
justice.
ELCC Standard 6.1
Prompt 18
Understands and can
advocate for school
students, families, and
caregivers
************
Response had little to no
description regarding the
understanding and
advocating for school students,
families, and caregivers, nor did
the response address the following
areas:
policies, laws, and
regulations enacted by
state, local, and federal
authorities that affect
schools;
the effect that poverty,
disadvantages, and
resources have on
families, caregivers,
communities, students,
and learning. (6.1)
************
The narrative is of substandard
Response provided an adequate
description and understanding
for advocating for school
students, families, and
caregivers. Adequate
information was provided for
one of the following areas:
policies, laws, and
regulations enacted by state,
local, and federal authorities
that affect schools;
the effect that poverty,
disadvantages, and
resources have on families,
caregivers, communities,
students, and learning. (6.1)
************
The narrative is of sufficient quality,
including a reasonable depth of
Response provided a comprehensive
and well-rounded description and
understanding of understanding
for advocating for school students,
families, and caregivers. The
response also provided a
comprehensive well-rounded
description of the following areas:
policies, laws, and
regulations enacted by
state, local, and federal
authorities that affect
schools;
the effect that poverty,
disadvantages, and
resources have on
families, caregivers,
communities, students,
and learning. (6.1)
************
47
Quality of narrative,
scholarly literature, and
artifacts
quality, lacking understanding of
the larger context of policy and
legal advocacy
The narrative is supported with
little or no scholarly literature
addressing the larger advocacy
context.
Insufficient artifacts are referenced
and presented in the Appendix to
support the candidate’s
understanding of the larger context
of policy and legal advocacy.
understanding of the larger context
of policy and legal advocacy.
Sufficient scholarly literature (more
than one citation) is used to support
the candidate’s understanding of the
larger advocacy context.
Appropriate artifacts are referenced
in the narrative and presented in the
Appendix to support the candidate’s
understanding of the larger context
of policy and legal advocacy.
The narrative is of exceptional
quality, including in-depth
understanding of the larger
context of policy and legal
advocacy.
An extensive amount of high-
quality scholarly literature is used
to support the candidate’s
understanding of the larger
advocacy context.
A large array of high-quality
artifacts are referenced in the
narrative and presented in the
Appendix to support the
candidate’s understanding of the
larger context of policy and legal
advocacy.
ELCC Standard 6.2
Prompt 19 (Part 1)
Understand and can act
to influence local, district,
state, and national
decisions affecting
student learning in a
school environment
Response had little to no
description regarding how to
understanding and act to influence
local, district, state, and national
decisions affecting student learning
in a school environment, nor did
the response address the following
areas:
the larger, political, social,
economic, legal, and cultural
context;
ways that power and
political skills can influence
local, state, or federal
decisions. (6.2)
Response provided an adequate
description regarding how to
understand and can act to
influence local, district, state,
and national decisions affecting
student learning in a school
environment. Adequate
information was provided for
one of the following areas:
the larger, political, social, economic,
legal, and cultural context;
ways that power and
political skills can influence
local, state, or federal
decisions. (6.2)
Response provided a comprehensive
and well-rounded description and
understanding of how to act to
influence local, district, state, and
national decisions affecting student
learning in a school environment.
The response also provided a
comprehensive well-rounded
description of the following areas:
the larger, political, social, economic,
legal, and cultural context;
ways that power and
political skills can influence
local, state, or federal
decisions. (6.2)
48
************
Quality of narrative,
scholarly literature, and
artifacts
************
The narrative is of substandard
quality, lacking understanding of
the key legal components guiding
policy making.
The narrative is supported with
little or no scholarly literature
addressing the larger context of
trends and initiatives for improved
school-based leadership strategies.
Insufficient artifacts are referenced
and presented in the Appendix to
support the candidate’s ability to
adapt leadership strategies to
address emerging school issues
************
The narrative is of sufficient quality,
including a reasonable depth of
understanding of the key legal
components guiding policy making.
Sufficient scholarly literature (more
than one citation) is used to support
the candidate’s ability to respond to
the larger context of trends and
initiatives for improved school-based
leadership strategies.
Appropriate artifacts are referenced
in the narrative and presented in the
Appendix to support the candidate’s
ability to adapt leadership strategies
to address emerging school issues.
************
The narrative is of exceptional
quality, including in-depth
understanding of the key legal
components guiding policy
making.
An extensive amount of high-
quality scholarly literature is used
to support the candidate’s ability
to respond to the larger context of
trends and initiatives for
improved school-based leadership
strategies.
A large array of high-quality
artifacts are referenced in the
narrative and presented in the
Appendix to support the
candidate’s ability to adapt
leadership strategies to address
emerging school issues.
ELCC Standard 6.3
Prompt 19 (Part 2)
Understand and can
anticipate and assess
emerging trends and
initiatives in order to
adapt school-based
leadership strategies
Response had little to no
description regarding how to
understand and anticipate and
assess emerging trends and
initiatives in order to adapt
school-based leadership strategies,
nor did the response address the
following two areas:
future issues and trends
that can affect schools
(e.g., entrepreneurial
approaches);
contemporary and
Response provided an adequate
description regarding how to
understand and anticipate and
assess emerging trends and
initiatives in order to adapt
school-based leadership
strategies. Adequate
information was provided for
one of the following areas:
future issues and trends that
can affect schools (e.g.,
entrepreneurial
approaches);
contemporary and emerging
Response provided a comprehensive
and well-rounded description and
understanding of how to anticipate
and assess emerging trends and
initiatives in order to adapt
school-based leadership strategies.
The response also provided a
comprehensive well-rounded
description of the following areas:
future issues and trends
that can affect schools
(e.g., entrepreneurial
approaches);
contemporary and
49
************
Quality of narrative,
scholarly literature, and
artifacts
emerging leadership
strategies to address
trends. (6.3)
************
The narrative is of substandard
quality, lacking understanding of
the key legal components guiding
policy making.
The narrative is supported with
little or no scholarly literature
addressing the larger context of
trends and initiatives for improved
school-based leadership strategies.
Insufficient artifacts are referenced
and presented in the Appendix to
support the candidate’s ability to
adapt leadership strategies to
address emerging school issues.
leadership strategies to
address trends. (6.3)
************
The narrative is of sufficient quality,
including a reasonable depth of
understanding of the key legal
components guiding policy making.
Sufficient scholarly literature (more
than one citation) is used to support
the candidate’s ability to respond to
the larger context of trends and
initiatives for improved school-based
leadership strategies.
Appropriate artifacts are referenced
in the narrative and presented in the
Appendix to support the candidate’s
ability to adapt leadership strategies
to address emerging school issues.
emerging leadership
strategies to address
trends. (6.3)
************
The narrative is of exceptional
quality, including in-depth
understanding of the key legal
components guiding policy
making.
An extensive amount of high-
quality scholarly literature is used
to support the candidate’s ability
to respond to the larger context of
trends and initiatives for
improved school-based leadership
strategies.
A large array of high-quality
artifacts are referenced in the
narrative and presented in the
Appendix to support the
candidate’s ability to adapt
leadership strategies to address
emerging school issues.
50
Educational Administration, Curriculum and Supervision
Comprehensive Portfolio
Course Portfolio Evaluation Form
STUDENT: _________________________________________________
COURSE: __________________________________________________
INSTRUCTOR: ______________________________________________
SEMESTER: ________________________________________________
Instructions:
Courses forming a student’s M.Ed. and/or certification program contribute to the student’s competencies that are assessed through the
Comprehensive Portfolio. Each student is encouraged to solicit feedback from individual course instructors about the development of relevant
competencies that are part of that course. A student may include copies of these completed documents in the APPENDIX: Artifacts and Documentation
of the portfolio document.
INSTRUCTOR COMMENTS:
Instructor Signature Date
51
Data Tables Scoring
Results for:
Comprehensive Portfolio
EXPECTATIONS NOT MET
(0 points)
EXPECTATIONS MINIMALLY
MET (1 point)
MEETS EXPECTATIONS
(2 points)
ELCC 1.1
ELCC 1.2
ELCC 1.3
ELCC 1.4
ELCC 1.0 % % %
ELCC 2.1
ELCC 2.2
ELCC 2.3
ELCC 2.4
ELCC 2.0 % % %
ELCC 3.1
ELCC 3.2
ELCC 3.3
ELCC 3.4
ELCC 3.5
ELCC 3.0 % % %
ELCC 4.1
ELCC 4.2
ELCC 4.3
ELCC 4.4
ELCC 4.0 % % %
ELCC 5.1
ELCC 5.2
ELCC 5.3
ELCC 5.4
ELCC 5.5
ELCC 5.0 % % %
ELCC 6.1
ELCC 6.2
ELCC 6.3
ELCC 6.0 % % %