the comprehensive portfolio - university of oklahoma eacs... · the comprehensive portfolio...

51
THE COMPREHENSIVE PORTFOLIO ASSESSMENT AND HANDBOOK Building Level Leadership Students in the Master’s Degree and Principal Certification Programs Updated Fall 2015 Educational Administration, Curriculum and Supervision Department of Educational Leadership & Policy Studies The Jeannine Rainbolt College of Education The University of Oklahoma 820 Van Vleet Oval Norman, OK 73019 http://education.ou.edu/departments/eacs/

Upload: lenhan

Post on 07-Aug-2019

216 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: THE COMPREHENSIVE PORTFOLIO - University of Oklahoma EACS... · The Comprehensive Portfolio provides the master’s and/or certification candidate the opportunity to document his/her

THE COMPREHENSIVE PORTFOLIO ASSESSMENT AND HANDBOOK

Building Level Leadership

Students in the Master’s Degree and Principal Certification Programs

Updated Fall 2015

Educational Administration, Curriculum and Supervision

Department of Educational Leadership & Policy Studies

The Jeannine Rainbolt College of Education

The University of Oklahoma

820 Van Vleet Oval

Norman, OK 73019

http://education.ou.edu/departments/eacs/

Page 2: THE COMPREHENSIVE PORTFOLIO - University of Oklahoma EACS... · The Comprehensive Portfolio provides the master’s and/or certification candidate the opportunity to document his/her

2

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Introduction ............................................................................................................3

Portfolio Development ...........................................................................................5

Portfolio Document ................................................................................................5

Appendix A: Artifacts, Portfolio Format and Evaluation ...............................10

Appendix B: Portfolio Prompts and Scoring Guide .........................................13

Portfolio Scoring Rubric for Prompts................................................................19

Page 3: THE COMPREHENSIVE PORTFOLIO - University of Oklahoma EACS... · The Comprehensive Portfolio provides the master’s and/or certification candidate the opportunity to document his/her

3

Educational Administration, Curriculum and Supervision

Comprehensive Portfolio Development and Evaluation

INTRODUCTION

All students in a master’s or principal certification program in Educational Administration, Curriculum and Supervision (EACS) are

required to successfully complete and submit a portfolio prior to the completion of the program. For students in a master’s program, the

portfolio constitutes the comprehensive examination for the non-thesis program.

Purpose

The Comprehensive Portfolio provides the master’s and/or certification candidate the opportunity to document his/her accomplishments,

and skills related to educational leadership and administration. The process of portfolio development and the substance of the portfolio

document are under girded by the mission of the EACS Program Area and the College of Education as well as the conceptual framework

of Program Area.

College of Education Mission Statement

The mission of the College of Education is to promote inquiry and practices that foster democratic life and that are fundamental to the

interrelated activities of teaching, research, and practice in the multi-disciplinary field of education.

EACS Mission Statement

The mission of EACS is to promote critical inquiry that addresses important issues relating to teaching, learning, and leadership in order

that service and collaboration among colleagues and the professional communities may be enhanced.

EACS Conceptual Framework

The Educational Administration, Curriculum and Supervision (EACS) area believes that PK-12 schools are complex organizations that

need leaders who understand: 1) the theoretical and conceptual aspects of schools, their people, and programs for both children and adults

who are constantly learning from the context of the organization; 2) the technical knowledge of the content areas and areas of

specialization found within the EACS knowledge bases; 3) the integration of theory, research, and practice as a means of grounding new

best practices.

Page 4: THE COMPREHENSIVE PORTFOLIO - University of Oklahoma EACS... · The Comprehensive Portfolio provides the master’s and/or certification candidate the opportunity to document his/her

4

The EACS curriculum is under girded by a dynamic knowledge base that reflects current and recommended practices as examined

through basic and applied research. The EACS graduate should be able to transfer theory and research into practice and to analyze

practice through theory and research. To this end, theory, research, and practice are viewed as reciprocal and equal in developing and

refining program area offerings. The curriculum is vertically and horizontally articulated, allowing students the opportunity to study both

the broader area of leadership and an area of emphasis as they become proficient in understanding, applying, and conducting research -

both formally, as scholar leaders, and informally, as informed practitioners through action research. The curriculum provides the

conceptual and philosophical bases of continuing education as students develop specified competencies.

The EACS faculty recognize the unique learning needs of our adult students. Accordingly, the faculty encourages learning through the

utilization of a variety of instructional approaches (e.g., lecture, discussion, large and small group work, computer and non-computer

simulation, site visitations, and interactions with practitioners) in order to properly engage students in learning.

Further, the faculty of EACS recognize that as an outgrowth of its conceptual framework there are knowledge bases accepted by learned

societies such as UCEA and the National Policy Board For Educational Administration (NPBEA). Within these accepted but evolving

knowledge bases there are competencies and skills that may also be applied in regulated field experiences such as internships and practica.

The competencies and skills evolve (broadly) around the following:

1. societal and cultural influences on schooling;

2. teaching and learning processes that are responsive to individual differences among

students, teachers, administrators, and families;

3. theories of organizations and organizational change;

4. policy analysis and studies (e.g., legal and economic);

5. leadership and professional development;

6. moral and ethical dimensions of schooling in a pluralistic society;

7. instructional and administrative technologies available to support effective school

leadership and decision making.

STANDARDS

The Comprehensive Portfolio is grounded in the standards for advanced programs in Educational Leadership for Principals by the

Educational Leadership Constituent Council (ELCC).

Page 5: THE COMPREHENSIVE PORTFOLIO - University of Oklahoma EACS... · The Comprehensive Portfolio provides the master’s and/or certification candidate the opportunity to document his/her

5

PORTFOLIO DEVELOPMENT

The portfolio development process is ongoing. Beginning at the interview for admission, the admissions committee will discuss portfolio

requirements with the applicant. Students should begin preparing the portfolio upon entering the program and should continue through

the time of formal submission of the final document.

At the time of admission, a student is assigned a faculty advisor. Although the candidate is ultimately responsibility for developing the

portfolio document and preparing for the presentation, the faculty advisor assumes an important advisory role in the portfolio

development process.

The portfolio must draw on required EACS courses of the program. The student should use the standard Course Portfolio Evaluation

form, located in the Appendix. Completed course evaluation forms should be included in the student’s Comprehensive Portfolio.

PORTFOLIO DOCUMENT

The portfolio consists of two parts. The first of these is the NARRATIVE section, which includes written responses to the 19 portfolio

prompts. Second is the APPENDIX, which includes artifacts to support the written responses. Each of these sections is described in

detail below.

NARRATIVE SECTION

The narrative section includes six documents, each including responses to several prompts (between three and five prompts per document,

depending on the ELCC standard). Each of the six documents will include approximately 10 pages of narrative. Each response, to a

specific prompt, should cite scholarly literature and best practices in support of the discussion, and a list of references should be included

at the end of each of the six documents. Each response MUST refer to specific artifacts in the Appendix of the portfolio that support that

response. The written response to each individual prompt coupled with artifacts MUST demonstrate your competency in the relevant

ELCC standard elements. Portfolio reviewers will provide a separate, stand-alone evaluation for each individual prompt response and

supporting artifacts (the scoring rubrics are included in the Appendix).

Page 6: THE COMPREHENSIVE PORTFOLIO - University of Oklahoma EACS... · The Comprehensive Portfolio provides the master’s and/or certification candidate the opportunity to document his/her

6

PROMPTS

Following are the prompts, along with courses that can be used as a basis for the written response and artifacts: Remember, your

responses MUST demonstrate your understanding of and your ability to apply ELCC standards.

Document 1: Visionary Leadership – A building-level leader must have knowledge of how to promote the success of students by

understanding principles for the development, articulation, implementation, and stewardship of a school vision of learning.

1. Define vision and discuss the role of the educational leader to develop, articulate, implement, and steward a shared vision of

learning. (ELCC 1.1)

EACS 5233 Organization of Education, EACS 5543 School Level Instructional Leadership

2. Identify and discuss specific school variables related to organizational effectiveness (grounded in theory and evidence). Provide

specific strategies for data collection, data use and plan development for school improvement. (ELCC 1.2)

EACS 5233 Organization of Education, EACS 5403 Inquiry for Performance Improvement

3. Explain a principal’s role in the promotion of continuous and sustained improvement, such as but not limited to vision and change

processes (ground in theory and evidence). (ELCC 1.3)

EACS 5233 Organization of Education, EACS 5920 Principal Internship, EACS 5403 Inquiry for Performance Improvement

4. Explain how to evaluate school progress and how to evaluate and revise plans supported by school stakeholders. (ELCC 1.4)

EACS 5233 Organization of Education, EACS 5403 Inquiry for Performance Improvement

Document 2: Instructional Leadership – A building-level leader must have knowledge of principles for advocating, nurturing and

sustaining a school culture and instructional programs conducive to student learning and staff professional growth.

5. Explain how a principal promotes student success through a school culture and instructional program with collaboration, trust

and a personalized learning environment (ground in theory and evidence). (ELCC 2.1)

EACS 5543 School Level Instructional Leadership, EACS 5573 Supervision of Instruction, EACS 5920 Principal Internship

6. Discuss research-based practices for creating and evaluating a comprehensive, rigorous, and coherent curricular and

instructional school program. (ELCC 2.2)

EACS 5543 School Level Instructional Leadership, EACS 5573 Supervision of Instruction, EACS 5920 Principal Internship

Page 7: THE COMPREHENSIVE PORTFOLIO - University of Oklahoma EACS... · The Comprehensive Portfolio provides the master’s and/or certification candidate the opportunity to document his/her

7

7. How can a leader develop and supervise the instructional and leadership capacity of school staff? (ELCC 2.3)

EACS 5573 Supervision of Instruction, EACS 5920 Principal Internship

8. Discuss a leader’s role in promoting effective and appropriate technologies to support teaching and learning in a school

environment. (ELCC 2.4)

EACS 5573 Supervision of Instruction, EACS 5920 Principal Internship

Document 3: Organizational Leadership – A building-level leader must have knowledge of best practices regarding management

of a school organization, operations, and resources for a safe, efficient, and effective learning environment.

9. Provide recommendations (based on theory and evidence) for the effective use of organizational planning, monitoring, and

evaluation of school management and operations that focus on learning needs of students. (ELCC 3.1)

EACS 5343 Financial Leadership in Schools

10. What are key elements, based on theory and evidence, of effective school level fiscal and technological operations? Include specific

recommendations for policies and procedures that protect the welfare and safety of students and staff within the school.

(ELCC 3.2, 3.3)

EACS 5343 Financial Leadership in Schools, EACS 5543 School Level Instructional Leadership, EACS 5920 Principal Internship

11. Explain how features of distributed school leadership can promote and encourage instructional practices that support high-

quality instruction and student learning. Discuss the role of the principal to develop school capacity for distributed leadership,

and the role of the principal to ensure teacher and organizational time focuses on supporting high-quality school instruction

and student learning. Include evidence and theory to support your claims/rationale. (ELCC 3.4, 3.5)

EACS 5543 School Level Instructional Leadership, EACS 5920 Principal Internship

Document 4: Collaborative Leadership – A building-level leader must have knowledge of strategies for collaboration with faculty

and community members, understanding of diverse community interests and needs, and best practices for mobilizing community

resources.

12. Explain how collaborating with faculty and community members in collecting and analyzing information related to the schools

larger educational environment can enhance student success. (ELCC 4.1) EACS 5333 Politics in Educational Administration, EACS 5920 Principal Internship

Page 8: THE COMPREHENSIVE PORTFOLIO - University of Oklahoma EACS... · The Comprehensive Portfolio provides the master’s and/or certification candidate the opportunity to document his/her

8

13. Describe the types of resources within the larger school environment that school leaders can mobilize to enhance learning

opportunities for all students. (ELCC 4.2)

EACS 5333 Politics in Educational Administration, EACS 5920 Principal Internship

14. Discuss strategies and actions that school leaders can use to build and sustain cooperative relationships with families, caregivers,

and community partners. (ELCC 4.3, 4.4)

EACS 5333 Politics in Educational Administration, EACS 5920 Principal Internship

Document 5: Ethical Leadership - A building-level leader models and applies knowledge that promotes the success of every

student by acting with integrity, fairness, and engages in ethical manner to ensure a school system of accountability for every

student’s academic and social success.

15. What is your understanding of integrity and acting with integrity? How is that different from the multiple meanings of fairness

that would ensures student academic and social success? (ELCC 5.1) EACS 5243 Education and the Law, EACS 5573 Supervision of Instruction, EACS 5920 Principal Internship

16. Describe the commonly recognized ethical reference points for decision making available

to the educational leader. How do these systems or “paradigms” help you when interacting with others by modeling principles of

self-awareness and making moral and legal decisions? (ELCC 5.2, 5.4)

EACS 5243 Education and the Law, EACS 5573 Supervision of Instruction, EACS 5920 Principal Internship

17. What are the foundational principles of social justice? Why are the values of democracy, equity, and diversity paramount in

public schooling? (ELCC 5.3, 5.5)

EACS 5243 Education and the Law, EACS 5573 Supervision of Instruction, EACS 5920 Principal Internship

Document 6: Contextual Leadership – A building-level leader must have knowledge of how to respond to and influence the

political, social, economic, legal, and cultural context within a school.

18. Describe the major areas of inquiry that guide education law and provide key case law analysis for school policy making that would

allow you to be an advocate for students, families, and caregivers. (ELCC 6.1) EACS 5243 Education and the Law, EACS 5920 Principal Internship

Page 9: THE COMPREHENSIVE PORTFOLIO - University of Oklahoma EACS... · The Comprehensive Portfolio provides the master’s and/or certification candidate the opportunity to document his/her

9

19. Discuss current issues in education law with their policy solutions and emerging trends. How must these be communicated with

school stakeholders to influence local, district, state, and national decisions affecting student learning for the improvement

of the school community especially as they relate to influencing decisions that affect student learning and to adapt school-

based leadership strategies? (ELCC 6.2, 6.3) EACS 5243 Education and the Law, EACS 5920 Principal Internship

Page 10: THE COMPREHENSIVE PORTFOLIO - University of Oklahoma EACS... · The Comprehensive Portfolio provides the master’s and/or certification candidate the opportunity to document his/her

10

APPENDIX A

This section will contain all of the documents and artifacts that support the responses to the prompts. Examples of artifacts by ELCC

standard elements include:

Standard 1.0 (ELCC 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, and 1.4)

EACS 5233 Organization of Education Development of Vision Performance Activity; Vision Plan activity

EACS 5233 Organization of Education Field Experience

EACS 5533 School Level Instructional Leadership Models of Best Practices in Education Essay; A Plan of Instructional

Improvement

EACS 5920 Principal Internship for ELCC 1.3

EACS 5403 Inquiry for Performance Improvement Continuous Improvement Plan or Problem Solving Study or related

assignments with data use for school improvement decisions

Other artifacts that demonstrate your skills and competency related to visionary leadership

Standard 2.0 (ELCC 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, and 2.4)

EACS 5543 School Level Instructional Leadership Models of Best Practices in Education Essay; A Plan of Instructional

Improvement

EACS 5573 Supervision of Instruction Authentic Supervision Activity

EACS 5543 School Level Instructional Leadership Field Experience

EACS 5573 Supervision of Instruction Field Experience

EACS 5920 Principal Internship for ELCC Elements 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, and 2.4

Other artifacts that demonstrate your skills and competency related to visionary leadership

Standard 3.0 (ELCC 3.1, 3.2, and 3.3)

EACS 5343 Financial Leadership Organizational and Resource Management Activity

EACS 5343 Financial Leadership School Operations Activity

EACS 5343 Financial Leadership Field Experience

Page 11: THE COMPREHENSIVE PORTFOLIO - University of Oklahoma EACS... · The Comprehensive Portfolio provides the master’s and/or certification candidate the opportunity to document his/her

11

EACS 5543 School Level Instructional Leadership Models of Best Practices in Education Essay: A Plan of Instructional

Improvement

EACS 5920 Principal Internship for ELCC Element 3.2

Other artifacts that demonstrate your skills and competency related to organizational leadership

Standard 4.0 (ELCC 4.1, 4.2, and 4.3)

EACS 5333 Politics in Ed Admin Legislative Policy Brief paper/presentation

EACS 5333 Politics in Ed Admin Interviews with school board members/class presentation

EACS 5333 Politics in Ed Admin Field Experience

EACS 5920 Principal Internship for ELCC Element 4.1

EACS 5920 Principal Internship for ELCC Element 4.2

EACS 5920 Principal Internship for ELCC Element 4.3

Other artifacts that demonstrate your skills and competency related to collaborative leadership

Standard 5.0 (ELCC 5.1, 5.2, and 5.3)

EACS 5573 Supervision of Instruction Authentic Supervision Activity

EACS 5263 Education and the Law Performance and Field Activity

EACS 5593 Principal Leadership; Case Narrative and Analysis

EACS 5920 Principal Internship for ELCC Element 5.1

EACS 5920 Principal Internship for ELCC Element 5.2

EACS 5920 Principal Internship for ELCC Element 5.3

Other artifacts that demonstrate your skills and competency related to ethical leadership

Standard 6.0 (ELCC 61, 6.2, and 6.3)

EACS 5533 School Level Instructional Leadership Models of Best Practices in Education Essay; A Plan of Instructional Improvement

EACS 5263 Education and the Law Legal Analysis Performance Activity

EACS 5920 Principal Internship for ELCC Element 6.1

EACS 5920 Principal Internship for ELCC Element 6.2

EACS 5920 Principal Internship for ELCC Element 6.3

Other artifacts that demonstrate your skills and competency related to leadership in the larger context

Page 12: THE COMPREHENSIVE PORTFOLIO - University of Oklahoma EACS... · The Comprehensive Portfolio provides the master’s and/or certification candidate the opportunity to document his/her

12

PORTFOLIO FORMAT

The Portfolio document MUST be submitted in electronic format. Students who have been admitted to candidacy should have a link to

the EACS Comprehensive Portfolio through learn.ou.edu under Permanent Courses (if the link is not available, please contact ELPS

staff). Please upload the portfolio into the Dropbox. Instructions for the order of the narratives and artifacts are included in the Dropbox.

Please ensure that your uploaded submission is complete. Also, allow yourself time to access the learn.ou.edu site to ensure that you are

able to submit all documents by the designated portfolio submission due date. If you are experiencing technical difficulties to upload your

documents to the Dropbox, you should notify the ELPS staff.

Each page comprising the portfolio should be in one of the following file formats:

Portable document format (.pdf file);

Microsoft office format (.doc, xls, .ppt files);

Word document in rich text format (.rtf file); or,

Hyperlink markup language (.htm file)

Other file formats may be used if the EACS program area coordinator grants permission PRIOR to the submission of the portfolio.

PORTFOLIO EVALUATION

The portfolio will typically be due 10 business days prior to the final day of classes of the semester in which it is to be submitted, unless

an alternative date is indicated by program area coordinator at the beginning of the semester.

Please refer to the Comprehensive Portfolio Scoring Guide included in Appendix B. The portfolio document will be evaluated by at least

three members of the faculty. Faculty reviewers will use the scoring rubric to evaluate each of the responses as ‘Meets Expectations’ (2

points) ‘Expectation’s Minimally Met’ (1 point), or ‘Expectation Not Met’ (0 points). An average score will then be derived for each

response. In order to earn a SATISFACTORY, a candidate must receive an average evaluation of ‘Expectations Minimally Met’ or

‘Meets Expectations’ (average score of 1 or higher) on EACH of the 19 responses.

The expectation of the faculty is that all candidates will successfully complete the portfolio process. However, any student who receives

an UNSATISFACTORY or ‘Expectations Not Met’ score may attempt to successfully complete the process at least one semester later

(by Graduate College policy). It is anticipated that candidate will make substantive changes to the portfolio document to help ensure

success during this second attempt. These changes are critical because a candidate is allowed a maximum of two attempts.

Page 13: THE COMPREHENSIVE PORTFOLIO - University of Oklahoma EACS... · The Comprehensive Portfolio provides the master’s and/or certification candidate the opportunity to document his/her

13

APPENDIX B

PORTFOLIO PROMPTS AND SCORING GUIDE

ELCC Standard One: A building-level education leader applies knowledge that promotes the success of every student by collaboratively

facilitating the development, articulation, implementation, and stewardship of a shared school vision of learning through the collection and

use of data to identify school goals, assess organizational effectiveness, and implement school plans to achieve school goals; promotion of

continual and sustainable school improvement; and evaluation of school progress and revision of school plans supported by school-based

stakeholders.

Prompts for Standards 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, and 1.4:

Prompt 1. Define vision and discuss the role of the educational leader to develop, articulate, implement, and steward a shared vision working with

diverse stakeholders.

Assessment of candidate’s ability to understand and collaboratively develop, articulate, implement, and steward a shared vision of learning for a

school: (ELCC 1.1)

Prompt 2. Identify and discuss specific school variables related to organizational effectiveness (grounded in theory and evidence). Provide specific

strategies for data collection, data use and plan development for school improvement.)

Assessment of candidate’s ability to understand and can collect and use data to identify school goals, assess organizational effectiveness, and

create and implement plans to achieve school goals:

(ELCC 1.2)

Prompt 3. Explain a principal’s role in the promotion of continuous and sustained improvement, such as but not limited to vision and change processes

(ground in theory and evidence).

Assessment of candidate’s ability to understand and can promote continual and sustainable school improvement: (ELCC 1.3)

Prompt 4. Explain how to monitor and evaluate improvement plans and how to communicate this progress with stakeholders.

Assessment of candidate’s ability to understand can evaluate school progress and revise school plans supported by school stakeholders: (ELCC 1.4)

Page 14: THE COMPREHENSIVE PORTFOLIO - University of Oklahoma EACS... · The Comprehensive Portfolio provides the master’s and/or certification candidate the opportunity to document his/her

14

ELCC Standard 2.0: A building-level education leader applies knowledge that promotes the success of every student by sustaining a school

culture and instructional program conducive to student learning through collaboration, trust, and a personalized learning environment with

high expectations for students; creating and evaluating a comprehensive, rigorous and coherent curricular and instructional school

program; developing and supervising the instructional and leadership capacity of school staff; and promoting the most effective and

appropriate technologies to support teaching and learning within a school environment.

Prompts for Standards 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, and 2.4:

Prompt 5. Explain how a principal promotes student success through a school culture and instructional program with collaboration, trust and a personalized

learning environment (ground in theory and evidence).

Assessment of candidate’s ability to understand and sustain a school culture and instructional program conducive to student learning

through collaboration, trust, and a personalized learning environment with high expectations for students: (ELCC 2.1)

Prompt 6. Discuss research-based practices for creating and evaluating a comprehensive rigorous, and coherent curricular and instructional school

program.

Assessment of candidate’s ability to understand and create and evaluate a comprehensive, rigorous, and coherent curricular and

instructional school program: (ELCC 2.2)

Prompt 7. How can a leader develop and supervise the instructional and leadership capacity of school staff?

Assessments of candidate’s ability to understand and develop and supervise the instructional and leadership capacity of school staff:

(ELCC 2.3)

Prompt 8. Discuss a leader’s role in promoting effective and appropriate technologies to support teaching and learning in a school environment.

Candidates understand and can promote the most effective and appropriate technologies to support teaching and learning in a school

environment: (ELCC 2.4)

Page 15: THE COMPREHENSIVE PORTFOLIO - University of Oklahoma EACS... · The Comprehensive Portfolio provides the master’s and/or certification candidate the opportunity to document his/her

15

ELCC Standard 3.0: A building-level education leader applies knowledge that promotes the success of every student by ensuring the

management of the school organization, operation, and resources through monitoring and evaluating the school management and

operational systems; efficiently using human, fiscal, and technological resources in a school environment; promoting and protecting the

welfare and safety of school students and staff; developing school capacity for distributed leadership; and ensuring that teacher and

organizational time is focused to support high-quality instruction and student learning.

Prompts 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.4, and 3.5:

Prompt 9. Provide recommendations (based on theory and evidence) for the effective use of organizational planning, management and evaluation of school

management and operations that focus on learning needs of students.

Assessment of the candidates understanding of monitoring and evaluation school management and operational systems: (ELCC 3.1)

Prompt 10. What are key elements, based on theory and evidence, of effective school level fiscal operations? Include specific recommendations for policies

and procedures that protect the welfare and safety of students and staff within the school.

Assessment of candidates ability to understand and efficiently use human, fiscal, and technological resources to manage school operations and can

understand and promote school-based policies and procedures that protect the welfare and safety of students and staff across the school:

(ELCC 3.2, 3.3)

Prompt 11. Explain how features of distributed school leadership can promote and encourage instructional practices that support high-quality

instruction and student learning. Discuss the role of the principal to develop school capacity for distributed leadership, and the role of the principal to

ensure teacher and organizational time focuses on supporting high-quality school instruction and student learning. Include evidence and theory to

support your claims/rationale.

Assessment of candidate’s ability to understand and develop school capacity for distributed leadership and to understand and ensure teacher and

organizational time focuses on supporting high-quality school instruction and student learning: (ELCC 3.4, 3.5)

Page 16: THE COMPREHENSIVE PORTFOLIO - University of Oklahoma EACS... · The Comprehensive Portfolio provides the master’s and/or certification candidate the opportunity to document his/her

16

ELCC Standard 4.0: A building-level education leader applies knowledge that promotes the success of every student by collaborating with faculty

and community members, responding to diverse community interests and needs, and mobilizing community resources on behalf of the school by

collecting and analyzing information pertinent to improvement of the school’s educational environment; promoting an understanding, appreciation,

and use of the diverse cultural, social, and intellectual resources within the school community; building and sustaining positive school relationships

with families and caregivers; and cultivating productive school relationships and community partners.

Prompts 4.1, 4.2, 4.3 and 4.4:

Prompt 12. Explain how collaborating with faculty and community members in collecting and analyzing information related to the schools larger

educational environment can enhance student success.

Assessment of candidate’s ability to understand and collaborate with faculty and community members by collecting and analyzing information

pertinent to the improvement of the school’s educational environment: (ELCC 4.1)

Prompt 13. Describe the types of resources within the larger school environment that school leaders can mobilize to enhance learning opportunities

for all students.

Assessment of candidates ability to understand and mobilize resources by promoting understanding, appreciation, and use of the community’s

diverse cultural, social, and intellectual resources within the school community: (ELCC 4.2)

Prompt 14. Discuss strategies and actions that school leaders can use to build and sustain cooperative relationships with families, caregivers, and

community partners.

Assessment of candidate’s ability to understand and respond to community interests and needs by building and sustaining positive relationships with

families and caregivers: (ELCC 4.3, 4.4)

Page 17: THE COMPREHENSIVE PORTFOLIO - University of Oklahoma EACS... · The Comprehensive Portfolio provides the master’s and/or certification candidate the opportunity to document his/her

17

ELCC Standard 5.0: A building-level education leader applies knowledge that promotes the success of every student by acting with integrity,

fairness, and in an ethical manner to ensure a school system of accountability for every student’s academic and social success by modeling

school principles of self-awareness, reflective practice, transparency, and ethical behavior as related to their roles within the school;

safeguarding the values of democracy, equity, and diversity within the school; evaluating the potential moral and legal consequences of

decision making in the school; and promoting social justice within the school to ensure that individual student needs inform all aspects of

schooling.

Prompts 5.1, 5.2, 5.3, 5.4, and 5.5:

Prompt 15. What is your understanding of integrity and acting with integrity? How is that different from the multiple meanings of fairness so as to

ensure student academic and social success?

Assessment of candidate’s ability to understand and act with integrity and fairness to ensure a school system of accountability for every student’s

academic and social success: (ELCC 5.1)

Prompt 16. Describe the commonly recognized ethical reference points for decision-making available to the educational leader. How do these

systems or “paradigms” help you when interacting with others and making decisions?

Assessment of candidates ability to understand and model principles of self-awareness, reflective practice, transparency, and ethical behaviors as

related to their roles within the school and candidates ability to evaluate the potential moral and legal consequences of decision-making in the school:

(ELCC 5.2, 5.4)

Prompt 17. What are the foundational principles of social justice? Why are the values of democracy, equity, and diversity paramount in public

schooling?

Assessment of candidate’s ability to understand and safeguard the values of democracy, equity, and diversity within the school and their ability to

promote social justice within the school to ensure that individual student needs inform all aspects of schooling: (ELCC 5.3, 5.5)

Page 18: THE COMPREHENSIVE PORTFOLIO - University of Oklahoma EACS... · The Comprehensive Portfolio provides the master’s and/or certification candidate the opportunity to document his/her

18

ELCC Standard 6.0: A building-level education leader applies knowledge that promotes the success of every student by understanding , responding

to and influencing the larger political, social, economic, legal, and cultural context through advocating for school students, families, and caregivers;

acting to influence local, district, state, and national decisions affecting student learning in a school environment; and anticipating and assessing

emerging trends and initiatives in order to adapt school-based leadership strategies.

Prompts 6.1, 6.2, and 6.3:

Prompt 18. Describe the major areas of inquiry that guide education law and provide key case law analysis for school policy making.

Assessment of candidate’s ability to understand and advocate for school, students, families, and caregivers: (ELCC 6.1)

Prompt 19. Discuss the current issues in education law with their policy solutions. How might these issues be communicated with school stakeholders for the

improvement of the school community?

Assessment of candidate’s ability to understand and act to influence local, district, state, and national decisions affecting student learning within the

school context as well as anticipate and assess emerging trends and initiatives in order to adapt school-based leadership strategies: (ELCC 6.2, 6.3)

Page 19: THE COMPREHENSIVE PORTFOLIO - University of Oklahoma EACS... · The Comprehensive Portfolio provides the master’s and/or certification candidate the opportunity to document his/her

19

Portfolio Scoring Rubric for Prompts

ASSESSMENT

TASKS

EXPECTATIONS

NOT MET

(0 POINTS)

EXPECTATIONS MINIMALLY

MET

(1 POINT)

MEETS

EXPECTATIONS

(2 POINTS)

ELCC Standard 1.1

Prompt 1

Ability to collaboratively

develop, articulate, and

steward a shared vision of

learning for a school.

************

Quality of narrative,

scholarly literature, and

Response indicated little to no

evidence of the ability to design

and support a collaborative

process for regarding developing,

articulating, implementation, and

stewarding a school vision.

Neither did it include a sufficient

description of the following areas:

collaborative school

visioning;

theories relevant to

building,

articulating,

implementing, and

stewarding a

school vision;

methods for

involving school

stakeholders in the

visioning process.

(1.1)

************

The narrative is of substandard

quality, lacking understanding

Response mentioned an

adequate description regarding

design and support of the

collaborative process for

developing, articulating,

implementation, and stewarding

a school vision. It also included

a sufficient description of two

of the following areas:

collaborative school visioning;

theories relevant to

building, articulating,

implementing, and

stewarding a school

vision;

methods for

involving school

stakeholders in the

visioning process.

(1.1)

************ The narrative is of sufficient

quality, including a reasonable

Response demonstrated a

complete and thorough

understanding and application

regarding the design and

support of a collaborative

process for developing,

articulating, and stewarding a

school vision. The response

also included a comprehensive

well-designed description of

the following areas:

collaborative school

visioning;

theories relevant to

building,

articulating,

implementing, and

stewarding a school

vision;

methods for

involving school

stakeholders in the

visioning process.

(1.1)

************

The narrative is of

exceptional quality, including

Page 20: THE COMPREHENSIVE PORTFOLIO - University of Oklahoma EACS... · The Comprehensive Portfolio provides the master’s and/or certification candidate the opportunity to document his/her

20

artifacts to support

standard element

of processes supporting the

development of a vision.

The narrative is supported with

little or (no scholarly literature

addressing the development of

a vision.

Insufficient artifacts are

referenced and presented in the

Appendix to support the

candidate’s ability to develop a

vision.

depth of understanding and

application of the processes

supporting the development of a

vision.

Sufficient scholarly literature

(more than one citation) is used

to support the candidate’s

discussion of the process of

vision development.

Appropriate artifacts are

referenced in the narrative and

presented in the Appendix to

support the candidate’s ability to

develop a vision.

The candidate discusses with

alacrity relevant knowledge.

in-depth understanding,

reflection, and application of

the school leader’s role in

developing a school vision.

An extensive amount of high-

quality scholarly literature is

used to support the

candidate’s discussion of

vision development.

A large array of high-quality

artifacts are referenced in the

narrative and presented in the

Appendix to support the

candidate’s ability to develop

a vision.

The candidate provides an

extraordinary discussion of

the relevant knowledge.

ELCC Standard 1.2

Prompt 2

Collect and use data to

identify school goals

Response indicated little to no

evidence of the ability to collect

and use data to identify school

goals, nor did it provide any

information regarding the

following:

the design and use of

assessment data for

learning;

organizational

effectiveness and

learning strategies; tactical and strategic

program planning;

implementation and

evaluation of school

improvement

Response mentioned a

description of how to collect

and use data to identify school

goals. Also, limited information

was provided in two of the

following areas:

the design and use of

assessment data for

learning;

organizational

effectiveness and

learning strategies; tactical and strategic program planning;

implementation and

evaluation of school

improvement

Response provided a

comprehensive and well-rounded

description of a plan of how to

collect and use data to identify

school goals. The response also

included a comprehensive

description of the three following

areas:

the design and use of

assessment data for

learning;

organizational

effectiveness and

learning strategies; tactical and strategic program planning;

implementation and

Page 21: THE COMPREHENSIVE PORTFOLIO - University of Oklahoma EACS... · The Comprehensive Portfolio provides the master’s and/or certification candidate the opportunity to document his/her

21

************

Quality of narrative,

scholarly literature,

artifacts, and research

strategies to support

standard element

processes;

variables that affect

student achievement. the design and use of

assessment data for

learning. (1.2)

*************

The narrative is of substandard

quality, lacking understanding of

the issues related to the

articulation of school variables

related to organizational

effectiveness and strategies for

data collection, data use and plan

development.

The narrative is supported with

little or no scholarly literature

addressing the articulation of

school variables related to

organizational effectiveness and

strategies for data collection,

data use and plan development

Insufficient artifacts are

referenced and presented in the

Appendix to support the

candidate’s ability to understand

school improvement processes.

The candidate does not identify

or discuss research strategies,

planning processes, or

communication elements.

processes;

variables that affect

student achievement. (1.2)

*************

The narrative is of sufficient

quality, including a reasonable

depth of understanding and

application of the issues specific

to school variables related to

organizational effectiveness and

strategies for data collection,

data use and plan development

Sufficient scholarly literature

(more than one citation) is used

to support the candidate’s

discussion of the issues related to

the articulation of school

variables related to

organizational effectiveness and

strategies for data collection,

data use and plan development

Appropriate artifacts are

referenced in the narrative and

presented in the Appendix to

support the candidate’s ability to

understand school improvement

processes.

The candidate both identifies and

appropriately discusses research

strategies, planning processes,

and some communication

elements.

evaluation of school

improvement

processes;

variables that affect

student achievement. (1.2)

************ The narrative is of exceptional

quality, including in-depth

understanding, reflection, and

application of the issues specific

to school variables related to

organizational effectiveness and

strategies for data collection,

data use and plan development

An extensive amount of high-

quality scholarly literature is

used to support the candidate’s

discussion of school variables

related to organizational

effectiveness and strategies for

data collection, data use and

plan development

A large array of high-quality

artifacts are referenced in the

narrative and presented in the

Appendix to support the

candidate’s ability to

understand school improvement

processes.

The candidate provides an

extraordinary discussion of

research strategies, planning

processes, and numerous

Page 22: THE COMPREHENSIVE PORTFOLIO - University of Oklahoma EACS... · The Comprehensive Portfolio provides the master’s and/or certification candidate the opportunity to document his/her

22

communication elements.

ELCC Standard 1.3

Prompt 3

Promotes continual

and sustainable

school improvement

************

Quality of narrative and artifacts

to support

Standard element

Response indicated little to no

evidence of the ability to promote

continuous and sustainable school

improvement, nor did it provide

any information regarding any of

the following:

continual and sustained

improvement models and

processes;

school change processes

for continual and

sustainable improvement;

role of professional

learning in continual and

sustainable school

improvement. (1.3)

************

The narrative is supported with

little or no scholarly literature

pertaining to continuous and

sustained improvement

Insufficient artifacts are

referenced and presented in the

Appendix to support the

candidate’s ability to promote

continuous and sustained

Response identified strategies

and practices that promote

continuous and sustainable

school improvement. It also

provided sufficient information

regarding two of the following:

continual and sustained

improvement models and

processes;

school change processes for

continual and sustainable

improvement;

role of professional learning

in continual and sustainable

school improvement. (1.3)

************

Sufficient scholarly literature

(more than one citation) is used

to support the candidate’s

discussion pertaining to

continuous and sustained

improvement

Appropriate artifacts are

referenced in the narrative and

presented in the Appendix to

support the candidate’s ability to

promote continuous and

Response provided a

comprehensive and well-rounded

description for identifying

strategies or practices to build

organizational capacity that

promote continuous and

sustainable school improvement.

The response also included a

comprehensive description of the

following areas:

continual and sustained

improvement models and

processes;

school change processes for

continual and sustainable

improvement;

role of professional

learning in continual and

sustainable school

improvement. (1.3)

************ An extensive amount of high-

quality scholarly literature

pertaining to continuous and

sustained improvement

A large array of high-quality

artifacts are referenced in the

narrative and presented in the

Appendix to support the

candidate’s ability to promote

continuous and sustained

improvement.

Page 23: THE COMPREHENSIVE PORTFOLIO - University of Oklahoma EACS... · The Comprehensive Portfolio provides the master’s and/or certification candidate the opportunity to document his/her

23

improvement. sustained improvement.

ELCC Standard 1. 4

Prompt 4

Evaluate school

progress and revise

school plans

supported by school

stakeholders

************

Quality of narrative,

scholarly literature, and

research strategies to

support standard element

Response indicated little to no

evidence of the ability to

evaluate school progress and

how to revise those plans

supported by school

stakeholders, nor did it provide

any information regarding the

following:

effective strategies for

monitoring the

implementation, revision

of plans to achieve school

improvement goals, and

program evaluation

models. (1.4)

************

The narrative is of

substandard quality, lacking

understanding of the various

processes to monitor and

evaluate improvement plans,

and how to communicate this

with stakeholders.

The narrative is supported

with little or no scholarly

literature addressing the

processes to monitor and

evaluate improvement plans,

and how to communicate this

with stakeholders.

Insufficient artifacts are

Response mentioned a

description of how to develop a

school plan to monitor program

development and

implementation of school goals.

Limited information was also

provided for the following:

effective strategies for

monitoring the

implementation, revision of

plans to achieve school

improvement goals, and

program evaluation models.

(1.4)

************

The narrative is of sufficient

quality, including a reasonable

depth of understanding and

application of the various

processes to monitor and

evaluate improvement plans,

and how to communicate this

with stakeholders.

Sufficient scholarly literature

(more than one citation) is used

to support the candidate’s

discussion the processes to

monitor and evaluate

improvement plans, and how to

communicate this with

Response provided a

comprehensive and well-rounded

description of a plan of how to

develop a school plan to monitor

program development and

implementation of school goals.

The response also included a

comprehensive well-rounded

description of the following:

effective strategies for

monitoring the

implementation, revision of

plans to achieve school

improvement goals, and

program evaluation models.

(1.4)

************

The narrative is of exceptional

quality, including in-depth

understanding, reflection, and

application of the various

processes to monitor and

evaluate improvement plans,

and how to communicate this

with stakeholders.

An extensive amount of high-

quality scholarly literature is

used to support the candidate’s

discussion of the processes to

monitor and evaluate

improvement plans, and how to

communicate this with

Page 24: THE COMPREHENSIVE PORTFOLIO - University of Oklahoma EACS... · The Comprehensive Portfolio provides the master’s and/or certification candidate the opportunity to document his/her

24

referenced and presented in

the Appendix to support the

candidate’s ability to monitor,

evaluate and communicate a

plan.

The candidate does not

identify or discuss the systems

for using data-based research

strategies to monitor and

evaluate an improvement

plan.

stakeholders.

Appropriate artifacts are

referenced in the narrative and

presented in the Appendix to

support the candidate’s ability to

monitor, evaluate and

communicate a plan.

The candidate both identifies

and appropriately discusses the

systems for using data-based

research strategies to monitor

and evaluate an improvement

plan.

stakeholders.

A large array of high-quality

artifacts are referenced in the

narrative and presented in the

Appendix to support the

candidate’s ability to monitor,

evaluate and communicate a

plan.

The candidate provides an

extraordinary discussion of the

systems for using data-based

research strategies to monitor

and evaluate an improvement

plan.

ASSESSMENT

TASKS

EXPECTATIONS

NOT MET

(0 POINTS)

EXPECTATIONS MINIMALLY

MET

(1 POINT)

MEETS

EXPECTATIONS

(2 POINTS)

ELCC Standard 2.1

Prompt 5

Sustain a school culture

and instructional

program

Response indicated little to no

evidence of the ability to promote

and sustain a school culture and

instructional program through

collaboration that promotes student

learning, nor did it provide any

information regarding the

following:

theories on human

development behavior,

personalized learning

environment, and

motivation;

school culture and ways it

can be influenced to ensure

student success. (2.1)

Response mentioned an adequate

description regarding how to

sustain a school culture through

collaboration that promotes

student learning. It also included

a sufficient description of one of

the following areas:

theories on human

development behavior,

personalized learning

environment, and motivation;

school culture and ways it

can be influenced to ensure

student success. (2.1)

************

The narrative is of sufficient quality,

Response provided a

comprehensive and well-rounded

description of the ability to

promote and sustain a school

culture that promotes student

learning. The response also

included a well-rounded

comprehensive description of all

of the following:

theories on human

development behavior,

personalized learning

environment, and

motivation;

school culture and ways it

can be influenced to

ensure student success.

Page 25: THE COMPREHENSIVE PORTFOLIO - University of Oklahoma EACS... · The Comprehensive Portfolio provides the master’s and/or certification candidate the opportunity to document his/her

25

************

Quality of narrative,

scholarly literature, and

artifacts to support

standard element

************ The narrative is of substandard

quality, lacking understanding of

school culture and its relationship

with the instructional program that

explains how a principal promotes

student success through

collaboration, trust, and a

personalized learning environment.

The narrative is supported with

little or no scholarly literature

addressing school culture and the

instructional program.

Insufficient artifacts are referenced

and presented in the Appendix to

support the candidate’s ability to

promote a positive school culture to

support the learning environment.

including a reasonable depth of

understanding and application of the

integration of school culture and the

instructional program that explains

how a principal promotes student

success through collaboration, trust,

and a personalized learning

environment.

Sufficient scholarly literature (more

than one citation) is used to support

the candidate’s discussion of school

culture and the instructional

program.

Appropriate artifacts are referenced

in the narrative and presented in the

Appendix to support the candidate’s

ability to promote a positive school

culture to support the learning

environment.

(2.1)

************

The narrative is of exceptional

quality, including in-depth

understanding, reflection, and

application of the integration of

school culture and the

instructional program that

explains how a principal promotes

student success through

collaboration, trust, and a

personalized learning

environment. .

An extensive amount of high-

quality scholarly literature is used

to support the candidate’s

discussion of school culture and

the instructional program.

A large array of high-quality

artifacts are referenced in the

narrative and presented in the

Appendix to support the

candidate’s ability to promote a

positive school culture to support

the learning environment.

ELCC Standard 2.2

Prompt 6

Create and evaluate a

comprehensive,

rigorous, and coherent

curricular and

instructional school

program

Response indicated little to no

evidence of understanding and

creation and evaluation of a

comprehensive, rigorous, and

coherent curricular program, nor

did it provide any information

regarding any of the following:

curriculum

development and

Response mentioned an adequate description

regarding how to

create and evaluate a

comprehensive,

rigorous, and coherent

curricular and

instructional school

program. It also included a

sufficient description of two of

the following areas:

Response provided a comprehensive

and well-rounded description of the

ability to create and evaluate a

comprehensive, rigorous, and

coherent curricular and

instructional school program. The

response also included a

well-rounded comprehensive

description of all of the following:

curriculum

Page 26: THE COMPREHENSIVE PORTFOLIO - University of Oklahoma EACS... · The Comprehensive Portfolio provides the master’s and/or certification candidate the opportunity to document his/her

26

*************

Quality of narrative,

artifacts, scholarly

literature, artifacts,

theory, and measures of

teacher performance

instructional

delivery theories;

measures of teacher

performance;

multiple methods of

evaluation, accountability

systems, data collection, and

analysis of evidence;

school technology and

information systems to

support and monitor student

learning (2.2)

************

The narrative is of substandard

quality, lacking understanding of

research-based practices for

creating and evaluating a

comprehensive, rigorous, and

coherent curricular and

instructional school program.

The narrative is supported with

little or no scholarly literature

addressing the improvement of

instruction through effective

curriculum design and evaluation.

Insufficient artifacts are referenced

curriculum

development and

instructional delivery

theories;

measures of teacher

performance;

multiple methods of evaluation,

accountability systems, data

collection, and analysis of

evidence;

school technology

and information

systems to support

and monitor

student (2.2)

************

The narrative is of sufficient quality,

including a reasonable depth of

research-based practices for creating

and evaluating a comprehensive,

rigorous, and coherent curricular and

instructional school program.

Sufficient scholarly literature (more

than one citation) is used to address

the improvement of instruction

through effective curriculum design

and evaluation.

Appropriate artifacts are referenced

in the narrative and presented in the

Appendix to support the candidate’s

ability to provide an effective

instructional program.

development and

instructional

delivery theories;

measures of teacher

performance;

multiple methods of

evaluation, accountability

systems, data collection, and

analysis of evidence;

school technology and

information systems to

support and monitor student. (2.2)

************

The narrative is of exceptional

quality, including in-depth

understanding, reflection, and

application of research-based

practices for creating and

evaluating a comprehensive,

rigorous, and coherent curricular

and instructional school program.

.

An extensive amount of high-

quality scholarly literature is used

to address the improvement of

instruction through effective

curriculum design and evaluation.

Page 27: THE COMPREHENSIVE PORTFOLIO - University of Oklahoma EACS... · The Comprehensive Portfolio provides the master’s and/or certification candidate the opportunity to document his/her

27

and presented in the Appendix to

support the candidate’s ability to

provide an effective instructional

program.

The candidate does not relate the

discussion to theory and measures

of teacher performance.

The candidate both identifies and

appropriately discusses theory, and

measures of teacher performance.

A large array of high-quality

artifacts are referenced in the

narrative and presented in the

Appendix to support the

candidate’s ability to provide an

effective instructional program.

The candidate provides an

extraordinary discussion of

theory, measures of teacher

performance, performance.

ELCC Standard 2.3

Prompt 7

Develop and supervise the

instructional and

leadership capacity of

school staff

*************

Quality of narrative,

artifacts, scholarly

literature, artifacts,

and research strategies.

Response indicated little to no

evidence of understanding how to

develop and supervise the

instructional and leadership

capacity of school staff, nor did it

provide any information regarding

any of the following:

high-quality professional

development for school staff

and leaders;

instructional leadership

practices;

leadership theory, change

processes, and evaluation;

standards for high-quality

teacher, principal, and

district practice. (2.3)

************

The narrative is of substandard

quality, lacking understanding of

strategies for the supervision of

instruction and leadership capacity.

The narrative is supported with

Response mentioned an adequate description

regarding how to

develop and supervise the

instructional and leadership

capacity of school staff. It also

included a sufficient description

of two of the following areas:

high-quality professional

development for school staff

and leaders;

instructional leadership practices;

leadership theory, change

processes, and evaluation;

standards for high-quality

teacher, principal, and

district practice. (2.3)

************

The narrative is of sufficient quality,

including a reasonable depth of

understanding and application of

strategies for the supervision of

instruction and leadership capacity.

Sufficient scholarly literature (more

than one citation) is used to support

Response provided a comprehensive

and well-rounded description of the

how to develop and supervise the

instructional and leadership

capacity of school staff. The

response also included a

well-rounded comprehensive

description of all of the following:

high-quality professional

development for school

staff and leaders;

instructional leadership

practices;

leadership theory, change

processes, and evaluation;

standards for high-quality

teacher, principal, and

district practice. (2.3)

************

The narrative is of exceptional

quality, including in-depth

understanding, reflection, and

application of strategies for the

Page 28: THE COMPREHENSIVE PORTFOLIO - University of Oklahoma EACS... · The Comprehensive Portfolio provides the master’s and/or certification candidate the opportunity to document his/her

28

little or no scholarly literature

pertaining to strategies for effective

supervision of instruction and

leadership capacity.

Insufficient artifacts are referenced

and presented in the Appendix to

support the candidate’s ability to

apply best practices for leading

instruction.

The candidate does not identify or

discuss appropriate research

strategies.

the candidate’s discussion pertaining

to strategies for effective supervision

of instruction and leadership

capacity.

Appropriate artifacts are referenced

in the narrative and presented in the

Appendix to support the candidate’s

ability to apply best practices for

leading instruction.

The candidate both identifies and

appropriately discusses appropriate

research strategies.

supervision of instruction and

leadership capacity.

An extensive amount of high-

quality scholarly literature

pertaining to strategies for

effective supervision of

instruction and leadership

capacity.

A large array of high-quality

artifacts are referenced in the

narrative and presented in the

Appendix to support the

candidate’s ability to apply best

practices for leading instruction.

The candidate provides an

extraordinary discussion of

appropriate research strategies.

ELCC Standard 2.4

Prompt 8

Promote the most

effective and

appropriate

technologies to

support teaching and

learning in a school

environment

Response indicated little to no

evidence of how to promote the

most effective and appropriate

technologies to support teaching

and learning in a school

environment, nor did it provide any

information regarding any of the following:

technology and its uses for

instruction within the

school;

infrastructures for the

ongoing support, review,

and planning of

instructional technology.

(2.4)

Response mentioned an adequate description

regarding how to

promote the most effective and appropriate

technologies to

support teaching and learning

in a school environment. It also

included a sufficient description

of the two following areas:

technology and its uses for

instruction within the

school;

infrastructures for the

ongoing support, review, and

planning of instructional

technology. (2.4)

Response provided a comprehensive

and well-rounded description of how

to promote the most effective and

appropriate technologies to

support teaching and learning in a

school environment. The response

also included a well-rounded

comprehensive description of all

of the following:

technology and its uses

for instruction within the

school;

infrastructures for the

ongoing support, review,

and planning of

instructional technology.

Page 29: THE COMPREHENSIVE PORTFOLIO - University of Oklahoma EACS... · The Comprehensive Portfolio provides the master’s and/or certification candidate the opportunity to document his/her

29

************

Quality of narrative,

scholarly literature, and

artifacts

************

The narrative is of substandard

quality, lacking understanding of

strategies for technology use for

improved instruction.

The narrative is supported with

little or no scholarly literature

pertaining to technology strategies

for leading effective instruction.

Insufficient artifacts are referenced

and presented in the Appendix to

support the candidate’s ability to

apply best practices of technology

use to support teaching and student

learning.

************

The narrative is of sufficient quality,

including a reasonable depth of

understanding and application of

strategies for technology use for

improved instruction.

Sufficient scholarly literature (more

than one citation) is used to support

the candidate’s discussion pertaining

to technology strategies for leading

effective instruction.

Appropriate artifacts are referenced

in the narrative and presented in the

Appendix to support the candidate’s

ability to apply best practices of

technology use to support teaching

and student learning.

(2.4)

************

The narrative is of exceptional

quality, including in-depth

understanding, reflection, and

application of strategies for

technology use for improved

instruction

An extensive amount of high-

quality scholarly literature

pertaining to technology strategies

for leading effective instruction.

A large array of high-quality

artifacts are referenced in the

narrative and presented in the

Appendix to support the

candidate’s ability to apply best

practices of technology use to

support teaching and student

learning.

ELCC Standard 3.1

Prompt 9

Monitor and evaluate

school management and

operational systems

Response indicated little to no

evidence of how to monitor and

evaluate school management

and operational systems, nor did it

provide any information regarding

following:

school management of

organizational, operational,

and legal resources;

school management of

marketing and public

relations functions. (3.1)

Response mentioned an adequate description

regarding how to

monitor and evaluate school management and

operational

systems. It also included a

sufficient description of the two

following areas:

school management of

organizational, operational,

and legal resources;

school management of

marketing and public

relations functions.

(3.1)

Response provided a comprehensive

and well-rounded description of how

to monitor and evaluate school

management and operational

systems. The response also included

a well-rounded comprehensive

description of all of the following:

school management of

organizational,

operational, and legal

resources;

school management of marketing

and public relations functions.

(3.1)

Page 30: THE COMPREHENSIVE PORTFOLIO - University of Oklahoma EACS... · The Comprehensive Portfolio provides the master’s and/or certification candidate the opportunity to document his/her

30

************

Quality of narrative,

best-practice literature,

and artifacts

************

The narrative is of substandard

quality, lacking understanding of

organizational planning and the

connection to equity, effectiveness,

and efficiency.

The narrative is supported with

little or no best practices literature

addressing organizational

management.

Insufficient artifacts are referenced

and presented in the Appendix to

support the candidate’s ability to

manage the organization.

**********

The narrative is of sufficient quality,

including a reasonable depth of

understanding and application of

organizational planning and the

connection to equity, effectiveness,

and efficiency.

Sufficient best practices literature

(more than one citation) is used to

support the candidate’s discussion of

organizational management.

Appropriate artifacts are referenced

in the narrative and presented in the

Appendix to support the candidate’s

ability to manage the organization.

************

The narrative is of exceptional

quality, including in-depth

understanding, reflection, and

application of organizational

planning and the connection to

equity, effectiveness, and

efficiency.

An extensive amount of high-

quality best practices literature is

used to support the candidate’s

discussion of organizational

management.

A large array of high-quality

artifacts are referenced in the

narrative and presented in the

Appendix to support the

candidate’s ability to manage the

organization.

ELCC Standard 3.2

Prompt 10 (Part 1)

Use of human,

fiscal, and technological resources

to manage

school operations

Response had little to no description

for efficiently using human, fiscal,

and technology resources within the

district to improve student learning.

Neither did the response include a

sufficient description of the

following areas:

methods and procedures for

managing school resources,

including the strategic

management of human

capital, school operations,

and school facilities;

alignment of resources to

Response mentioned an adequate

description for efficiently using

human, fiscal, and technology

resources within the school to

improve student learning.

Response also included a

sufficient description of two of

the following areas:

methods and procedures for

managing school resources,

including the strategic

management of human

capital, school operations,

and school facilities;

Response provided a

comprehensive and well-rounded

description for efficiently using

human, fiscal, and technology

resources within the school to

improve student learning.

Response also included a

comprehensive description of the

following areas:

methods and procedures

for managing school

resources, including the

strategic management of

human capital, school

Page 31: THE COMPREHENSIVE PORTFOLIO - University of Oklahoma EACS... · The Comprehensive Portfolio provides the master’s and/or certification candidate the opportunity to document his/her

31

************

Quality of narrative,

best-practice literature,

and artifacts

and forecasting resource

requirements for the school; technology and management

systems.. (3.2)

************

The narrative is of substandard

quality, lacking understanding of

operations and fiscal management.

The narrative is supported with

little or no best practices literature

addressing operations and fiscal

management

Insufficient artifacts are referenced

and presented in the Appendix to

support the candidate’s ability to

manage school operations.

alignment of resources to and

forecasting

resource requirements for the

school; technology and management

systems. (3.2)

**********

The narrative is of sufficient quality,

including a reasonable depth of

understanding and application of

operations and fiscal management.

Sufficient best practices literature

(more than one citation) is used to

support the candidate’s discussion of

operations and fiscal management.

Appropriate artifacts are referenced

in the narrative and presented in the

Appendix to support the candidate’s

ability to manage operations.

operations, and school

facilities;

alignment of resources to

and forecasting resource

requirements for the

school; technology and management

systems. (3.2)

************

The narrative is of exceptional

quality, including in-depth

understanding, reflection, and

application of operations and

fiscal management.

An extensive amount of high-

quality best practices literature is

used to support the candidate’s

discussion of operations and fiscal

management.

A large array of high-quality

artifacts are referenced in the

narrative and presented in the

Appendix to support the

candidate’s ability to manage

operations.

ELCC Standard 3.3

Prompt 10 (Part 2)

Protecting the welfare

and safety of student

and staff

Response provided an insufficient

description for promoting school-

based policies and procedures for

protecting the welfare and safety of

students and staff in the school and

did not include the following:

Response mentioned an adequate

description for promoting school-

based policies and procedures for

protecting the welfare and safety

of students and staff in the school.

Response also included a

Response provided a

comprehensive and well-rounded

description for promoting school-

based policies and procedures for

protecting the welfare and safety

of student and staff in the school,

Page 32: THE COMPREHENSIVE PORTFOLIO - University of Oklahoma EACS... · The Comprehensive Portfolio provides the master’s and/or certification candidate the opportunity to document his/her

32

************

Quality of narrative,

best-practice literature,

and artifacts

school strategies supporting

safe and secure learning

environments including

prevention, crisis

management, and public

relations;

school strategies supporting

student development of

self-management, civic

literacy, and positive

leadership skills; school-based discipline

management policies and plans (3.3)

**********

The narrative is of substandard

quality, lacking understanding of

operations and fiscal management

and its alignment to the welfare of

students and staff.

The narrative is supported with

little or no best practices literature

addressing operations and fiscal

management.

Insufficient artifacts are referenced

and presented in the Appendix to

support the candidate’s ability to

manage school operations for the

welfare of students and staff.

sufficient description of one of

the following areas:

school strategies supporting

safe and secure learning

environments including

prevention, crisis

management, and public

relations;

school strategies supporting

student development of self-

management, civic literacy,

and positive leadership

skills; school-based discipline

management policies and plans (3.3)

************

The narrative is of sufficient quality,

including a reasonable depth of

understanding and application of

operations and fiscal management

and its alignment to the welfare of

students and staff.

Sufficient best practices literature

(more than one citation) is used to

support the candidate’s discussion of

operations and fiscal management.

Appropriate artifacts are referenced

in the narrative and presented in the

Appendix to support the candidate’s

ability to manage operations for the

welfare of students and staff.

plus a well-defined description of

the following areas:

school strategies

supporting safe and secure

learning environments

including prevention,

crisis management, and

public relations;

school strategies

supporting student

development of self-

management, civic

literacy, and positive

leadership skills; school-based discipline

management policies and plans (3.3)

************

The narrative is of exceptional

quality, including in-depth

understanding, reflection, and

application of operations and

fiscal management and its

alignment to the welfare of

students and staff.

An extensive amount of high-

quality best practices literature is

used to support the candidate’s

discussion of operations and fiscal

management.

Page 33: THE COMPREHENSIVE PORTFOLIO - University of Oklahoma EACS... · The Comprehensive Portfolio provides the master’s and/or certification candidate the opportunity to document his/her

33

A large array of high-quality

artifacts are referenced in the

narrative and presented in the

Appendix to support the

candidate’s ability to manage

operations for the welfare of

students and staff.

ELCC Standard 3.4

Prompt 11 (Part 1)

Develop school capacity

for distributed leadership

************

Quality of narrative,

best-practice literature,

and artifacts

Response had little to no

description how to develop school

capacity for distributed leadership,

nor did the response provide any

information regarding the

following:

the meaning of distributed leadership in a school environment and how to create and sustain it. (3.4)

************

The narrative is supported with

little or no best practices literature

addressing distributed leadership.

Insufficient artifacts are

referenced and presented in the

Appendix to support the

candidate’s ability to develop

school capacity to distribute

leadership.

Response mentioned an adequate description

for how to develop

distributed leadership and also

adequate information was

provided for the following

areas:

the meaning of distributed leadership in a school environment and how to create and sustain it.. (3.4)

************

The narrative is of sufficient quality,

including a reasonable depth of

understanding of distributed

leadership.

Sufficient best practices literature

(more than one citation) is used to

support the candidate’s discussion of

distributed leadership.

Appropriate artifacts are referenced

in the narrative and presented in the

Appendix to support the candidate’s

ability to develop school capacity to

distribute leadership.

Response provided a comprehensive

and well-rounded description for

how to develop distributed

leadership and detailed and

comprehensive evidence was

provided for the following:

the meaning of distributed leadership in a school environment and how to create and sustain it.. (3.4)

************

The narrative is of exceptional

quality, including in-depth

understanding, reflection, and

application of distributed

leadership.

An extensive amount of high-

quality best practices literature is

used to support the candidate’s

discussion of distributed

leadership.

A large array of high-quality

artifacts are referenced in the

narrative and presented in the

Appendix to support the

candidate’s ability to develop

Page 34: THE COMPREHENSIVE PORTFOLIO - University of Oklahoma EACS... · The Comprehensive Portfolio provides the master’s and/or certification candidate the opportunity to document his/her

34

school capacity to distribute

leadership.

ELCC Standard 3.5

Prompt 11 (Part 2)

Ensure that teacher and

organizational time

focuses on supporting

high-quality school

instruction and student

learning.

************

Quality of narrative,

best-practice literature,

and artifacts

Response had little to no

description how to ensure that

teacher and organizational time

focuses on supporting

high-quality school instruction

and student learning, nor did the response provided any information

regarding the following:

supervision strategies that

ensure that teachers

maximize time spent on

high- quality instruction

and student learning; management theories on

effective school time, priorities, and schedules. (3.5)

************

The narrative is of substandard

quality, lacking understanding of

distributed leadership that is

aligned to teaching and learning.

The narrative is supported with

little or no best practices literature

addressing distributed leadership

for improved instruction.

Insufficient artifacts are

referenced and presented in the

Appendix to support the

candidate’s ability to develop

school capacity to distribute

Response identified strategies

and practices how to ensure that teacher and

organizational

time focuses on supporting

high-quality school instruction and and

student learning. The

response also included a

sufficient description of one

of the following areas:

supervision strategies that

ensure that teachers

maximize time spent on

high- quality instruction and

student learning; management theories on

effective school time, priorities, and schedules. (3.5)

************

The narrative is of sufficient quality,

including a reasonable depth of

understanding of distributed

leadership that is aligned to teaching

and learning.

Sufficient best practices literature

(more than one citation) is used to

support the candidate’s discussion of

distributed leadership for improved

instruction.

Appropriate artifacts are

referenced in the narrative and

presented in the Appendix to

support the candidate’s ability to

develop school capacity to

Response provided a comprehensive

and well-rounded description how

to ensure that teacher and

organizational time focuses on

supporting high-quality school

instruction and student learning.

In addition a well-defined

comprehensive description of the

following areas were also

provided:

supervision strategies that

ensure that teachers

maximize time spent on

high- quality instruction

and student learning; management theories on

effective school time, priorities, and schedules.

(3.5)

************

The narrative is of exceptional

quality, including in-depth

understanding, reflection, and

application of distributed

leadership that is aligned to

teaching and learning.

An extensive amount of high-

quality best practices literature is

used to support the candidate’s

discussion of distributed

leadership for improved

instruction.

A large array of high-quality

Page 35: THE COMPREHENSIVE PORTFOLIO - University of Oklahoma EACS... · The Comprehensive Portfolio provides the master’s and/or certification candidate the opportunity to document his/her

35

leadership; and to ensure

teacher and organizational time

focuses on supporting high-

quality school instruction and

student learning.

distribute leadership; and to

ensure teacher and organizational

time focuses on supporting high-

quality school instruction and

student learning.

artifacts are referenced in the

narrative and presented in the

Appendix to support the

candidate’s ability to develop

school capacity to distribute

leadership; and to ensure teacher

and organizational time focuses

on supporting high-quality school

instruction and student learning.

ELCC Standard 4.1

Prompt 12

Collaborate with faculty

and community

members

************

Response had little to no

description how to collaborate

with faculty and community

r egarding information pertinent

to the improvement of the school’s

educational environment, nor did

the response address the following

collaboration and

communication

techniques to improve

the school’s educational

environment; information pertinent to the

school’s educational environment. (4.1)

************

The narrative is of substandard

quality, lacking demonstration of

Response also identified

strategies and practices how to collaborate

with faculty and

community r ega rding

information pertinent to the improvement of

the school’s

educational environment. The

response also included a

sufficient description of one

of the following areas:

collaboration and

communication

techniques to improve

the school’s educational

environment; information pertinent to the

school’s educational environment. (4.1)

************

The narrative is of sufficient quality,

including a reasonable

demonstration and application of

Response provided a comprehensive

and well-rounded description how

to collaborate with faculty and

community members by

collecting and analyzing

information pertinent to the

improvement of the school’s

educational environment. In

addition, a well-defined

comprehensive description of the

following areas were also provided:

collaboration and

communication

techniques to improve

the school’s

educational

environment; information pertinent to the

school’s educational environment. (4.1)

************

The narrative is of exceptional

quality, including extraordinary

Page 36: THE COMPREHENSIVE PORTFOLIO - University of Oklahoma EACS... · The Comprehensive Portfolio provides the master’s and/or certification candidate the opportunity to document his/her

36

Quality of narrative,

scholarly literature,

artifacts, and research

based knowledge

bringing together the resources of

faculty and the community to

positively affect student learning.

The narrative is supported with

little or no scholarly literature

addressing collaboration with

stakeholders and other community

members.

Insufficient artifacts are referenced

and presented in the Appendix to

support the candidate’s ability to

collaborate with faculty and

community.

The candidate does not

demonstrate the ability to use

public information and research-

based knowledge of issues and

trends to collaborate with faculty

and community members.

bringing together the resources of

faculty and the community to

positively affect student learning.

Sufficient scholarly literature (more

than one citation) is used to support

the candidate’s discussion of

collaboration with stakeholders and

other community members.

Appropriate artifacts are referenced

in the narrative and presented in the

Appendix to support the candidate’s

ability to collaborate with faculty

and community.

The candidate provides clear

evidence of his/her ability to use

public information and research-

based knowledge of issues and

trends to collaborate with faculty and

community members.

demonstration and application of

bringing together the resources of

faculty and the community to

positively affect student learning.

An extensive amount of high-

quality best practices literature is

used to support the candidate’s

discussion of collaboration with

stakeholders and other community

members.

A large array of high-quality

artifacts are referenced in the

narrative and presented in the

Appendix to support the

candidate’s ability to collaborate

with faculty and community.

The candidate provides

substantial evidence of his/her

ability to use public information

and research-based knowledge of

issues and trends to collaborate

with faculty and community

members.

ELCC Standard 4.2

Prompt 13

Mobilize Community

Resources

Response had little to no

description how to mobilize

community resources, by

promoting an understanding,

appreciation, and use of the

diverse cultural, social, and

intellectual resources within the

school community, nor did the

response address the following:

identify and mobilize effective

Response mentioned an adequate

understanding of how to

mobilize community resources

by promoting an

understanding, appreciation,

and use of the diverse cultural, social, and

intellectual

resources within the school community.

The response also addressed an adequate

description for one of the

following:

Response provided a comprehensive

and well-rounded description how

to mobilize community resources

by promoting an understanding,

appreciation, and use of the

diverse cultural, social, and

intellectual resources within the

school community and a

comprehensive and complete

response of the following:

Page 37: THE COMPREHENSIVE PORTFOLIO - University of Oklahoma EACS... · The Comprehensive Portfolio provides the master’s and/or certification candidate the opportunity to document his/her

37

************

Quality of narrative,

scholarly literature,

artifacts, assessment

strategies and research

based knowledge and

methods

community resources;

school-based cultural

competence;

diverse cultural, social, and

intellectual community

resources. (4.2)

************

The narrative is of substandard

quality, lacking candidate

demonstration of the types of

resources within the larger school

environment that school leaders

can mobilize to enhance learning

opportunities for all students.

The narrative is supported with

little or no scholarly literature

addressing the types of resources

within the larger school

environment that school leaders

can mobilize to enhance learning

opportunities for all students.

Insufficient artifacts are

referenced and presented in the

Appendix to support the

candidate’s ability to respond to

community interests and needs;

and to describe and identify the

types of resources within the

larger school environment that

school leaders can mobilize to

identify and mobilize effective

community resources;

school-based cultural

competence;

diverse cultural, social, and

intellectual community

resources (4.2)

*************

The narrative is of sufficient

quality, including a reasonable

demonstration and application of

the types of resources within the

larger school environment that

school leaders can mobilize to

enhance learning opportunities for

all students.

Sufficient scholarly literature (more

than one citation) is used to support

the candidate’s discussion of the

types of resources within the larger

school environment that school

leaders can mobilize to enhance

learning opportunities for all

students. Appropriate artifacts are

referenced in the narrative and

presented in the Appendix to

support the candidate’s ability to

respond to community interests and

needs: and to describe and identify

the types of resources within the

larger school environment that

identify and mobilize

effective community

resources;

school-based cultural

competence;

diverse cultural, social, and

intellectual community

resources. (4.2)

************

The narrative is of exceptional

quality, including extraordinary

demonstration and application

of the types of resources within

the larger school environment

that school leaders can mobilize

to enhance learning

opportunities for all students. .

An extensive amount of high-

quality best practices literature

is used to support the

candidate’s discussion of the

types of resources within the

larger school environment that

school leaders can mobilize to

enhance learning opportunities

for all students.

A large array of high-quality

artifacts are referenced in the

narrative and presented in the

Appendix to support the

candidate’s ability to respond to

Page 38: THE COMPREHENSIVE PORTFOLIO - University of Oklahoma EACS... · The Comprehensive Portfolio provides the master’s and/or certification candidate the opportunity to document his/her

38

enhance learning opportunities for

all students.

The candidate does not discuss the

use of appropriate assessment

strategies and research methods to

understand and accommodate

diverse school and community

conditions and dynamics.

school leaders can mobilize to

enhance learning opportunities for

all students.

The candidate properly discusses

the use of appropriate assessment

strategies and research methods to

understand and accommodate

diverse school and community

conditions and dynamics.

community interests and needs;

and to describe and identify the

types of resources within the

larger school environment that

school leaders can mobilize to

enhance learning opportunities

for all students.

The candidate provides an

exceptional discussion of

appropriate assessment strategies

and research methods to

understand and accommodate

diverse school and community

conditions and dynamics.

ELCC Standard 4.3

Prompt 14 (Part 1)

Respond to community

interests and needs by

building and sustaining

positive school

relationships with

families and caregivers

Response had little to no

description how to understand and

respond to community interests and needs

needs by building and sustaining

positive school relationships,

nor did the response address any of thes,

the following:

the needs of

students, parents or

caregivers;

school organizational

culture that promotes

open communication

with families and

caregivers;

school strategies for

effective oral and written

communication with

families and caregivers;

approaches to collaboration

Response mentioned an adequate

understanding of how to

respond to community

interests and needs by

building and sustaining

positive school relationships.

The response also mentioned

adequate information for two of

the following:

the needs of

students, parents or

caregivers;

school organizational

culture that promotes

open communication with

families and caregivers;

school strategies for

effective oral and written

communication with

families and caregivers;

Response provided a comprehensive

and well-rounded description how

to understand and how to respond to

community interests and needs

by building and sustaining

positive school relationships. The

response also provided a

comprehensive well-rounded

description of the following:

the needs of

students, parents or

caregivers;

school organizational

culture that promotes

open communication

with families and

caregivers;

school strategies for

effective oral and written

communication with

Page 39: THE COMPREHENSIVE PORTFOLIO - University of Oklahoma EACS... · The Comprehensive Portfolio provides the master’s and/or certification candidate the opportunity to document his/her

39

************

Quality of narrative,

Scholarly literature, and

artifacts

with families and

caregivers. (4.3)

************

The narrative is of substandard

quality, lacking understanding of

the utilization of families and

various partners.

The narrative is supported with

little or no scholarly literature

addressing the inclusion of families

and communities in schools.

Insufficient artifacts are referenced

and presented in the Appendix to

support the candidate’s ability to

involve families and communities

approaches to collaboration

with families and caregivers.

(4.3)

************

The narrative is of sufficient quality,

including a reasonable depth of

understanding of the utilization of

families and various community

partners.

Sufficient scholarly literature (more

than one citation) is used to support

the candidate’s discussion of the

inclusion of families and

communities in schools.

Multiple artifacts are referenced in

the narrative and presented in the

Appendix to support the candidate’s

ability to involve families and

communities.

families and caregivers;

approaches to

collaboration with

families and caregivers.

(4.3)

*************

The narrative is of exceptional

quality, including in-depth

understanding, reflection, and

application of the utilization of

families and various community

partners.

An extensive amount of high-

quality scholarly literature is used

to support the candidate’s

discussion of the inclusion of

families and communities in

schools.

An extraordinarily large array of

artifacts are referenced in the

narrative and presented in the

Appendix to involve families and

communities.

ELCC Standard 4.4

Prompt 14 (Part 2)

Responding to

community interests

Response had little to no

description how to respond to

community interests and needs by

building and sustaining productive

school relationships with

Response provided an adequate

understanding of how to

respond to community interests

and needs by building and

sustaining productive school relationships

Response provided a comprehensive

and well-rounded description and

understanding of how to respond to

community interests and needs by

building and sustaining productive

Page 40: THE COMPREHENSIVE PORTFOLIO - University of Oklahoma EACS... · The Comprehensive Portfolio provides the master’s and/or certification candidate the opportunity to document his/her

40

and needs by building

and sustaining

productive school relationships

with

community partners

************

Quality of narrative,

scholarly literature, and

artifacts

community partners, nor did the response

address any of the following areas:

the needs of school

community partners;

school organizational

culture that promotes

open communication

with community

partners;

school strategies for effective

oral and written communication with

community partners;

collaboration methods to

develop and sustain

productive relationships

with community

partners. (4.4)

************

The narrative is of substandard

quality, lacking understanding of

the utilization of families and

various partners.

The narrative is supported with

little or no scholarly literature

addressing the inclusion of families

and communities in schools.

Insufficient artifacts are referenced

and presented in the Appendix to

support the candidate’s ability to

involve families and communities.

with community

partners. Adequate information

was provided for two of the

following:

the needs of school

community partners;

school organizational

culture that promotes

open communication with

community partners;

school strategies for effective

oral and written communication with

community partners;

collaboration methods to

develop and sustain

productive relationships

with community partners.

(4.4)

************

The narrative is of sufficient quality,

including a reasonable depth of

understanding of the utilization of

families and various community

partners.

Sufficient scholarly literature (more

than one citation) is used to support

the candidate’s discussion of the

inclusion of families and

communities in schools.

Multiple artifacts are referenced in

the narrative and presented in the

Appendix to support the candidate’s

ability to involve families and

communities.

school relationships with community

partners. The response also

provided a comprehensive

well-rounded description of the

following:

the needs of school

community partners;

school organizational

culture that promotes

open communication

with community

partners;

school strategies for effective oral and written communication with

community partners;

collaboration methods

to develop and sustain

productive

relationships with

community partners.

(4.4)

************

The narrative is of exceptional

quality, including in-depth

understanding, reflection, and

application of the utilization of

families and various community

partners.

An extensive amount of high-

quality scholarly literature is used

to support the candidate’s

discussion of the inclusion of

families and communities in

schools.

Page 41: THE COMPREHENSIVE PORTFOLIO - University of Oklahoma EACS... · The Comprehensive Portfolio provides the master’s and/or certification candidate the opportunity to document his/her

41

An extraordinarily large array of

artifacts are referenced in the

narrative and presented in the

Appendix to involve families and

communities.

ELCC Standard 5.1

Prompt 15

Act with integrity and

fairness to ensure a

school system of

accountability for every

student’s academic and

social success

************

Quality of narrative,

scholarly literature, and

artifacts

Response had little to no

description how to act with

integrity and fairness to ensure a

school system of accountability for

every student’s academic and

social success, nor did the

response address any of the

following areas:

practices demonstrating principles of integrity and fairness;

federal, state, and local legal and policy guidelines that creates operational

definitions of accountability, equity, and social justice. (5.1)

************

The narrative is of substandard

quality, lacking the understanding

of integrity and what fairness

means.

The narrative is supported with

little or no scholarly literature

addressing integrity and the

meanings of fairness.

Insufficient artifacts are referenced

Response provided an adequate

understanding and description

of how to act with integrity and

fairness to ensure a school

system of accountability for

every student’s academic and

social success. Adequate

information was provided for

one of the following:

practices demonstrating principles of integrity and

fairness; federal, state, and local legal

and policy guidelines that

creates operational definitions of accountability, equity,

and social justice. (5.1)

************

The narrative is of sufficient quality,

including a general understanding of

what integrity means and what

fairness means.

Sufficient scholarly literature (more

than one citation) is used to support

the candidate’s discussion of

integrity and the meanings of

fairness.

Multiple artifacts are referenced in

Response provided a comprehensive

and well-rounded description and

understanding of how to act with

integrity and fairness to ensure a

school system of accountability for

every student’s academic and

social success. The response also

provided a comprehensive

well-rounded description of the

following:

practices demonstrating

principles of integrity and fairness;

federal, state, and local legal

and policy guidelines that creates operational

definitions of

accountability, equity, and social justice. (5.1)

************

The narrative is of exceptional

quality, including in-depth

understanding, reflection, and

analysis of what integrity means

and what fairness means.

An extensive amount of high-

quality scholarly literature is used

to support the candidate’s

discussion of integrity and the

Page 42: THE COMPREHENSIVE PORTFOLIO - University of Oklahoma EACS... · The Comprehensive Portfolio provides the master’s and/or certification candidate the opportunity to document his/her

42

and presented in the Appendix to

support the candidate’s ability to

understand and act with integrity

and highlight the different

meanings of fairness.

the narrative and presented in the

Appendix to support the candidate’s

ability to understand and act with

integrity and highlight the different

meanings of fairness.

meanings of fairness.

An extraordinarily large array of

artifacts are referenced in the

narrative and presented in the

Appendix to support the

candidate’s ability to understand

and act with integrity and

highlights the different meanings

of fairness.

ELCC Standard 5.2

Prompt 16 (part 1)

Understands and can

model principles of self-

awareness, reflective

practice, transparency,

and ethical behavior as

related to their roles

within the school

*************

Quality of narrative,

scholarly literature, and

artifacts

Response had little to no

description how model principles

of self- awareness, reflective

practice, transparency, and ethical behavior

as related to their roles

within the school; neither did the

response include a sufficient

description of the following

areas:

the basic principles of ethical

behavior established

by legal and professional organizations;

the relationship between ethical behavior, school culture, and student

achievement; the effect of ethical behavior

on one’s own leadership. (5.2)

************

The narrative is of substandard

quality, lacking the understanding

of commonly recognized ethical

reference points for decision

Response mentioned an adequate description

for modeling

principles of self- awareness,

reflective practice,

transparency, and ethical

behavior as related to their

roles within the school. Adequate

information was provided for

one of the following:

the basic principles of ethical

behavior established

by legal and professional organizations;

the relationship between ethical behavior, school culture, and student achievement;

the effect of ethical behavior on one’s own leadership. (5.2)

************

The narrative is of sufficient quality,

including a general understanding of

commonly recognized ethical

reference points for decision making.

Sufficient scholarly literature (more

than one citation) is used to support

the candidate’s discussion of ethical

Response provided a comprehensive

and well-rounded description and

understanding of modeling

principles of self- awareness,

reflective practice, transparency,

and ethical behavior as related

to their roles within the school.

The response also provided a

comprehensive well-rounded

description of the following:

the basic principles of ethical behavior established

by legal and professional

organizations; the relationship between

ethical behavior, school

culture, and student achievement;

the effect of ethical behavior

on one’s own leadership. (5.2)

************

The narrative is of exceptional

quality, including in-depth

understanding, reflection, and

Page 43: THE COMPREHENSIVE PORTFOLIO - University of Oklahoma EACS... · The Comprehensive Portfolio provides the master’s and/or certification candidate the opportunity to document his/her

43

making.

The narrative is supported with

little or no scholarly literature

addressing ethical decision making.

Insufficient artifacts are referenced

and presented in the Appendix to

support the candidate’s ability to

engage in reflective ethical

decision making.

decision making.

Multiple artifacts are referenced in

the narrative and presented in the

Appendix to support the candidate’s

ability to engage in reflective ethical

decision making.

analytical application of

commonly recognized ethical

reference points for decision

making.

An extensive amount of high-

quality scholarly literature is used

to support the candidate’s

discussion of ethical decision

making.

An extraordinarily large array of

artifacts are referenced in the

narrative and presented in the

Appendix to support the

candidate’s ability to engage in

reflective ethical decision making.

ELCC Standard 5.4

Prompt 16 (Part 2)

Understands and can

evaluate the potential

moral and legal

consequences of decision

making in the school

************

Quality of narrative,

Response had little to no

description regarding the

understanding and evaluating of the

potential moral and legal

consequences of decision

making in the school, nor was any response

provided for the

following:

moral and legal

consequences of

decision making in

schools;

strategies to prevent

difficulties related to

moral and legal issues. (5.4)

************

The narrative is of substandard

Response provided an adequate

understanding and description

of how to evaluate the potential

moral and legal consequences

of decision making in the school.

Adequate information was

provided for one of the

following:

moral and legal

consequences of

decision making in

schools;

strategies to prevent

difficulties related to

moral and legal issues.

(5.4)

Response provided a comprehensive

and well-rounded description and

understanding evaluating the

potential moral and legal

consequences of decision

making in the school. The response

also provided a comprehensive

well-rounded description of the

following:

moral and legal

consequences of

decision making in

schools;

strategies to prevent

difficulties related to

moral and legal

issues. (5.4)

************

The narrative is of exceptional

Page 44: THE COMPREHENSIVE PORTFOLIO - University of Oklahoma EACS... · The Comprehensive Portfolio provides the master’s and/or certification candidate the opportunity to document his/her

44

scholarly literature,

artifacts, and reflection

on systems or paradigms

quality, lacking the understanding

of commonly recognized ethical

reference points for decision

making.

The narrative is supported with

little or no scholarly literature

addressing ethical decision making.

Insufficient artifacts are referenced

and presented in the Appendix to

support the candidate’s ability to

engage in reflective ethical

decision making.

The candidate does not effectively

discuss how they are aided by

knowing and reflecting on systems

or “paradigms” when interacting

with others.

The narrative is of sufficient quality,

including a general understanding of

commonly recognized ethical

reference points for decision making.

Sufficient scholarly literature (more

than one citation) is used to support

the candidate’s discussion of ethical

decision making.

Multiple artifacts are referenced in

the narrative and presented in the

Appendix to support the candidate’s

ability to engage in reflective ethical

decision making.

The candidate effectively discusses

how they are aided by knowing and

reflecting on systems or “paradigms”

when interacting with others.

quality, including in-depth

understanding, reflection, and

analytical application of

commonly recognized ethical

reference points for decision

making.

An extensive amount of high-

quality scholarly literature is used

to support the candidate’s

discussion of ethical decision

making.

An extraordinarily large array of

artifacts are referenced in the

narrative and presented in the

Appendix to support the

candidate’s ability to engage in

reflective ethical decision making.

The candidate includes a

thorough discussion of how they

are aided by knowing and

reflecting on systems or

“paradigms” when interacting

with others.

ELCC Standard 5.3

Prompt 17 (Part 1)

Understands and can

safeguard the values of

democracy, equity, and

diversity

************

Quality of narrative,

scholarly literature, and

artifacts

Response had little to no

description regarding the

understanding and safeguarding of

democracy, equity, and diversity.,

nor did the response address the

following areas: (5.3)

************

The narrative is of substandard

quality, lacking the understanding

of 1) values of democracy, 2)

Response provided an adequate

description and understanding

of how to safeguard the values of democracy,

equity, and

diversity. (5.3)

************

The narrative is of sufficient quality,

including a general understanding of

1) values of democracy, 2) equity,

Response provided a comprehensive

and well-rounded description and

understanding of safeguarding

the values of democracy, equity,

and diversity. (5.3)

************

The narrative is of exceptional

quality, including in-depth

understanding, reflection, and

Page 45: THE COMPREHENSIVE PORTFOLIO - University of Oklahoma EACS... · The Comprehensive Portfolio provides the master’s and/or certification candidate the opportunity to document his/her

45

equity, and 3) the basis for

diversity.

The narrative is supported with

little or no scholarly literature.

Insufficient artifacts are referenced

and presented in the Appendix to

support the candidate’s ability to

understand and engage with issues

of 1) values of democracy, 2)

equity, and 3) diversity

and 3) the basis for diversity.

Sufficient scholarly literature (more

than one citation) is used to support

the candidate’s discussion.

Multiple artifacts are referenced in

the narrative and presented in the

Appendix to support the candidate’s

ability to understand and engage

with issues of 1) values of

democracy, 2) equity, and 3)

diversity.

analysis of 1) values of

democracy, 2) equity, and 3) the

basis for diversity.

An extensive amount of high-

quality scholarly literature is used

to support the candidate’s

discussion.

An extraordinarily large array of

artifacts are referenced in the

narrative and presented in the

Appendix to support the

candidate’s ability to understand

and engage with issues of 1)

values of democracy, 2) equity,

and 3) diversity.

ELCC Standard 5.5

Prompt 17 (Part2)

Understands and can

promote social justice

within a school to ensure

that individual student

needs inform all aspects

of schooling

**********

Quality of narrative,

scholarly literature, and

Response had little to no

description regarding the

understanding and promoting of

social justice within a school to

ensure that individual student

needs inform all aspects of

schooling, nor did the response

address the following areas:

the relationship between

social justice, school

culture, and student

achievement;

theories of efficacy. (5.5)

************

The narrative is of substandard

quality, lacking the understanding

Response provided an adequate

description and understanding

of how to promote social justice

within a school to ensure

that individual student

needs inform all aspects

of schooling. Adequate

information was provided for

one of the following areas:

the relationship between

social justice, school culture,

and student achievement;

theories of efficacy. (5.5)

************

The narrative is of sufficient quality,

including a general understanding of

social justice.

Sufficient scholarly literature (more

Response provided a comprehensive

and well-rounded description and

understanding of promoting

social justice within a school to

ensure that individual student

needs inform all aspects of

schooling. The response also

provided a comprehensive

well-rounded description of the

following areas:

the relationship between

social justice, school

culture, and student

achievement;

theories of efficacy. (5.5)

************

The narrative is of exceptional

quality, including in-depth

Page 46: THE COMPREHENSIVE PORTFOLIO - University of Oklahoma EACS... · The Comprehensive Portfolio provides the master’s and/or certification candidate the opportunity to document his/her

46

artifacts

of social justice.

The narrative is supported with

little or no scholarly literature.

Insufficient artifacts are referenced

and presented in the Appendix to

support the candidate’s ability to

understand social justice.

than one citation) is used to support

the candidate’s discussion.

Multiple artifacts are referenced in

the narrative and presented in the

Appendix to support the candidate’s

ability to understand and engage

with issues of social justice.

understanding, reflection, and

analysis of social justice.

An extensive amount of high-

quality scholarly literature is used

to support the candidate’s

discussion.

An extraordinarily large array of

artifacts are referenced in the

narrative and presented in the

Appendix to support the

candidate’s ability to understand

and engage with issues of social

justice.

ELCC Standard 6.1

Prompt 18

Understands and can

advocate for school

students, families, and

caregivers

************

Response had little to no

description regarding the

understanding and

advocating for school students,

families, and caregivers, nor did

the response address the following

areas:

policies, laws, and

regulations enacted by

state, local, and federal

authorities that affect

schools;

the effect that poverty,

disadvantages, and

resources have on

families, caregivers,

communities, students,

and learning. (6.1)

************

The narrative is of substandard

Response provided an adequate

description and understanding

for advocating for school

students, families, and

caregivers. Adequate

information was provided for

one of the following areas:

policies, laws, and

regulations enacted by state,

local, and federal authorities

that affect schools;

the effect that poverty,

disadvantages, and

resources have on families,

caregivers, communities,

students, and learning. (6.1)

************

The narrative is of sufficient quality,

including a reasonable depth of

Response provided a comprehensive

and well-rounded description and

understanding of understanding

for advocating for school students,

families, and caregivers. The

response also provided a

comprehensive well-rounded

description of the following areas:

policies, laws, and

regulations enacted by

state, local, and federal

authorities that affect

schools;

the effect that poverty,

disadvantages, and

resources have on

families, caregivers,

communities, students,

and learning. (6.1)

************

Page 47: THE COMPREHENSIVE PORTFOLIO - University of Oklahoma EACS... · The Comprehensive Portfolio provides the master’s and/or certification candidate the opportunity to document his/her

47

Quality of narrative,

scholarly literature, and

artifacts

quality, lacking understanding of

the larger context of policy and

legal advocacy

The narrative is supported with

little or no scholarly literature

addressing the larger advocacy

context.

Insufficient artifacts are referenced

and presented in the Appendix to

support the candidate’s

understanding of the larger context

of policy and legal advocacy.

understanding of the larger context

of policy and legal advocacy.

Sufficient scholarly literature (more

than one citation) is used to support

the candidate’s understanding of the

larger advocacy context.

Appropriate artifacts are referenced

in the narrative and presented in the

Appendix to support the candidate’s

understanding of the larger context

of policy and legal advocacy.

The narrative is of exceptional

quality, including in-depth

understanding of the larger

context of policy and legal

advocacy.

An extensive amount of high-

quality scholarly literature is used

to support the candidate’s

understanding of the larger

advocacy context.

A large array of high-quality

artifacts are referenced in the

narrative and presented in the

Appendix to support the

candidate’s understanding of the

larger context of policy and legal

advocacy.

ELCC Standard 6.2

Prompt 19 (Part 1)

Understand and can act

to influence local, district,

state, and national

decisions affecting

student learning in a

school environment

Response had little to no

description regarding how to

understanding and act to influence

local, district, state, and national

decisions affecting student learning

in a school environment, nor did

the response address the following

areas:

the larger, political, social,

economic, legal, and cultural

context;

ways that power and

political skills can influence

local, state, or federal

decisions. (6.2)

Response provided an adequate

description regarding how to

understand and can act to

influence local, district, state,

and national decisions affecting

student learning in a school

environment. Adequate

information was provided for

one of the following areas:

the larger, political, social, economic,

legal, and cultural context;

ways that power and

political skills can influence

local, state, or federal

decisions. (6.2)

Response provided a comprehensive

and well-rounded description and

understanding of how to act to

influence local, district, state, and

national decisions affecting student

learning in a school environment.

The response also provided a

comprehensive well-rounded

description of the following areas:

the larger, political, social, economic,

legal, and cultural context;

ways that power and

political skills can influence

local, state, or federal

decisions. (6.2)

Page 48: THE COMPREHENSIVE PORTFOLIO - University of Oklahoma EACS... · The Comprehensive Portfolio provides the master’s and/or certification candidate the opportunity to document his/her

48

************

Quality of narrative,

scholarly literature, and

artifacts

************

The narrative is of substandard

quality, lacking understanding of

the key legal components guiding

policy making.

The narrative is supported with

little or no scholarly literature

addressing the larger context of

trends and initiatives for improved

school-based leadership strategies.

Insufficient artifacts are referenced

and presented in the Appendix to

support the candidate’s ability to

adapt leadership strategies to

address emerging school issues

************

The narrative is of sufficient quality,

including a reasonable depth of

understanding of the key legal

components guiding policy making.

Sufficient scholarly literature (more

than one citation) is used to support

the candidate’s ability to respond to

the larger context of trends and

initiatives for improved school-based

leadership strategies.

Appropriate artifacts are referenced

in the narrative and presented in the

Appendix to support the candidate’s

ability to adapt leadership strategies

to address emerging school issues.

************

The narrative is of exceptional

quality, including in-depth

understanding of the key legal

components guiding policy

making.

An extensive amount of high-

quality scholarly literature is used

to support the candidate’s ability

to respond to the larger context of

trends and initiatives for

improved school-based leadership

strategies.

A large array of high-quality

artifacts are referenced in the

narrative and presented in the

Appendix to support the

candidate’s ability to adapt

leadership strategies to address

emerging school issues.

ELCC Standard 6.3

Prompt 19 (Part 2)

Understand and can

anticipate and assess

emerging trends and

initiatives in order to

adapt school-based

leadership strategies

Response had little to no

description regarding how to

understand and anticipate and

assess emerging trends and

initiatives in order to adapt

school-based leadership strategies,

nor did the response address the

following two areas:

future issues and trends

that can affect schools

(e.g., entrepreneurial

approaches);

contemporary and

Response provided an adequate

description regarding how to

understand and anticipate and

assess emerging trends and

initiatives in order to adapt

school-based leadership

strategies. Adequate

information was provided for

one of the following areas:

future issues and trends that

can affect schools (e.g.,

entrepreneurial

approaches);

contemporary and emerging

Response provided a comprehensive

and well-rounded description and

understanding of how to anticipate

and assess emerging trends and

initiatives in order to adapt

school-based leadership strategies.

The response also provided a

comprehensive well-rounded

description of the following areas:

future issues and trends

that can affect schools

(e.g., entrepreneurial

approaches);

contemporary and

Page 49: THE COMPREHENSIVE PORTFOLIO - University of Oklahoma EACS... · The Comprehensive Portfolio provides the master’s and/or certification candidate the opportunity to document his/her

49

************

Quality of narrative,

scholarly literature, and

artifacts

emerging leadership

strategies to address

trends. (6.3)

************

The narrative is of substandard

quality, lacking understanding of

the key legal components guiding

policy making.

The narrative is supported with

little or no scholarly literature

addressing the larger context of

trends and initiatives for improved

school-based leadership strategies.

Insufficient artifacts are referenced

and presented in the Appendix to

support the candidate’s ability to

adapt leadership strategies to

address emerging school issues.

leadership strategies to

address trends. (6.3)

************

The narrative is of sufficient quality,

including a reasonable depth of

understanding of the key legal

components guiding policy making.

Sufficient scholarly literature (more

than one citation) is used to support

the candidate’s ability to respond to

the larger context of trends and

initiatives for improved school-based

leadership strategies.

Appropriate artifacts are referenced

in the narrative and presented in the

Appendix to support the candidate’s

ability to adapt leadership strategies

to address emerging school issues.

emerging leadership

strategies to address

trends. (6.3)

************

The narrative is of exceptional

quality, including in-depth

understanding of the key legal

components guiding policy

making.

An extensive amount of high-

quality scholarly literature is used

to support the candidate’s ability

to respond to the larger context of

trends and initiatives for

improved school-based leadership

strategies.

A large array of high-quality

artifacts are referenced in the

narrative and presented in the

Appendix to support the

candidate’s ability to adapt

leadership strategies to address

emerging school issues.

Page 50: THE COMPREHENSIVE PORTFOLIO - University of Oklahoma EACS... · The Comprehensive Portfolio provides the master’s and/or certification candidate the opportunity to document his/her

50

Educational Administration, Curriculum and Supervision

Comprehensive Portfolio

Course Portfolio Evaluation Form

STUDENT: _________________________________________________

COURSE: __________________________________________________

INSTRUCTOR: ______________________________________________

SEMESTER: ________________________________________________

Instructions:

Courses forming a student’s M.Ed. and/or certification program contribute to the student’s competencies that are assessed through the

Comprehensive Portfolio. Each student is encouraged to solicit feedback from individual course instructors about the development of relevant

competencies that are part of that course. A student may include copies of these completed documents in the APPENDIX: Artifacts and Documentation

of the portfolio document.

INSTRUCTOR COMMENTS:

Instructor Signature Date

Page 51: THE COMPREHENSIVE PORTFOLIO - University of Oklahoma EACS... · The Comprehensive Portfolio provides the master’s and/or certification candidate the opportunity to document his/her

51

Data Tables Scoring

Results for:

Comprehensive Portfolio

EXPECTATIONS NOT MET

(0 points)

EXPECTATIONS MINIMALLY

MET (1 point)

MEETS EXPECTATIONS

(2 points)

ELCC 1.1

ELCC 1.2

ELCC 1.3

ELCC 1.4

ELCC 1.0 % % %

ELCC 2.1

ELCC 2.2

ELCC 2.3

ELCC 2.4

ELCC 2.0 % % %

ELCC 3.1

ELCC 3.2

ELCC 3.3

ELCC 3.4

ELCC 3.5

ELCC 3.0 % % %

ELCC 4.1

ELCC 4.2

ELCC 4.3

ELCC 4.4

ELCC 4.0 % % %

ELCC 5.1

ELCC 5.2

ELCC 5.3

ELCC 5.4

ELCC 5.5

ELCC 5.0 % % %

ELCC 6.1

ELCC 6.2

ELCC 6.3

ELCC 6.0 % % %