the compatibility of speech functional expressionslib.unnes.ac.id/8130/1/8530.pdf · kudus 2010 and...
TRANSCRIPT
THE COMPATIBILITY
OF SPEECH FUNCTIONAL EXPRESSIONS
FOUND IN E-BOOK
DEVELOPING ENGLISH COMPETENCIES 3
PUBLISHED BY PUSAT PERBUKUAN DEPDIKNAS
WITH THE SCHOOL-BASED CURRICULUM
a final project
submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements
for the degree of Sarjana Pendidikan
in English Department
by
Kuswatun Chasanah
2201407101
ENGLISH DEPARTMENT
FACULTY OF LANGUAGES AND ARTS
SEMARANG STATE UNIVERSITY
2011
ii
ii
APPROVAL
This final project has been approved by the board of examiners of the English
Department of Languages and Arts Faculty of Semarang State University
on September 28th
2011.
Board of Examination
1. Chairperson
Drs. Dewa Made K., M.Pd.
195111181984031001 _____________________
2. Secretary
Dra. Rahayu Puji H., M.Hum.
196610201997022001 _____________________
3. First Examiner
Drs. Ahmad Sofwan, Ph.D.
196204271989011001 _____________________
4. Second Examiner/ Second Advisor
Intan Permata Hapsari, S.Pd, M.Pd.
197402242005012001 _____________________
5. Third Examiner/ First Advisor
Drs. Suprapto, M.Hum.
195311291982031002 _____________________
Approved by the Dean of the Faculty of Languages and Arts
Prof. Dr. Agus Nuryatin, M. Hum.
1960080319890110011
iii
iii
PERNYATAAN
Dengan ini saya,
Nama : Kuswatun Chasanah
NIM : 2201407101
Prodi/Jurusan : Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris/Bahasa Inggris
Fakultas : Bahasa dan Seni, Universitas Negeri Semarang,
menyatakan dengan sesungguhnya bahwa skripsi/tugas akhir/final project yang
berjudul
THE COMPATIBILITY OF SPEECH FUNCTIONAL EXPRESSIONS FOUND
IN E-BOOK DEVELOPING ENGLISH COMPETENCIES 3 PUBLISHED BY
PUSAT PERBUKUAN DEPDIKNAS WITH THE SCHOOL-BASED
CURRICULUM
yang saya tulis dalam rangka memenuhi salah satu syarat untuk memperoleh gelar
sarjana ini benar-benar merupakan karya saya sendiri yang saya hasilkan setelah
melalui pembimbingan, diskusi, dan pemaparan/ujian. Semua kutipan baik yang
diperoleh dari sumber kepustakaan, wahana elektronik, maupun sumber lainnya
telah disertai keterangan mengenai identitas sumbernya dengan cara sebagaimana
lazim dalam penulisan karya ilmiah. Dengan demikian, walaupun tim penguji dan
pembimbing skripsi/tugas akhir/final project ini membubuhkan tanda tangan
sebagaimana keabsahannya, seluruh isi karya ilmiah ini tetap menjadi tanggung
jawab saya sendiri. Jika kemudian ditemukan ketidakberesan, saya bersedia
menerima akibatnya. Demikian, harap pernyataan ini digunakan seperlunya.
Semarang, September 2011
Yang membuat pernyataan
Kuswatun Chasanah
iv
iv
“In a matter of conscience, the first thought is the best;
in a matter of wisdom, the best one is the latter we think.”
v
v
It is dedicated to:
- My beloved parents, Bapak Mudrikah
and Ibu Siti Rokhyatun
- My siblings, Eri and Khanza
vi
vi
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Firstly, I would like to express my gratitude to Allah SWT for the
blessing, the guidance, and the opportunity that gives me spirit to finish my final
project. Secondly, I would not finish my final project without the support of many
people, for that reason, I would like to express my gratitude to:
1. Prof. Dr. H. Sudijono Sastroatmodjo, M.Si., the rector of Semarang State
University,
2. Prof. Dr. Agus Nuryatin, M.Hum., the dean of the Faculty of Languages and
Arts, Semarang State University,
3. Drs. Ahmad Sofwan, Ph.D., the head of the English Department of the
Faculty of Languages and Arts, Semarang State University,
4. Drs. Suprapto, M.Hum., my first advisor, for his patience in providing
continuous and careful guidance as well as encouragement, indispensable
helpful correction, suggestion and advices,
5. Intan Permata Hapsari, S.Pd, M.Pd., my second advisor, who had been
patiently giving supervision, suggestion, correction, motivation, as well as
encouragement in completing my final project,
6. All lecturers of the English Department of the Faculty of Languages and Arts,
Semarang State University, who have educated me by giving knowledge and
values of life that contribute much in my final project,
7. My family who always give their pure love, prayer, and support for me,
vii
vii
8. All of my friends in Wisma Lestari, as my greatest motivators in
accomplishing my final project, the members of PPL SMP Negeri 1 Mejobo
Kudus 2010 and KKN Desa Kalipancur 2010, Kecamatan Blado-Batang, for
their love and support, and everyone who helped me to finish my final
project. May Allah bless them always.
I realize that my final project is imperfect, so I always look forward to any
feedback to make my final project better. Finally, I hope that my final project will
be useful for the readers.
Semarang, September 2011
Kuswatun Chasanah
viii
viii
ABSTRACT
Chasanah, Kuswatun. 2011. The Compatibility of Speech Functional Expressions
Found in e-Book Developing English Competencies 3 Published by Pusat
Perbukuan Depdiknas with the School-Based Curriculum. A Final Project,
English Department, Faculty of Languages and Arts, Semarang State
University. Advisors: 1. Drs. Suprapto, M.Hum., 2. Intan Permata Hapsari,
S.Pd., M.Pd.
Keywords: compatibility, speech functional expressions, e-book
The objectives of the study were to find out what kinds of text models of the
speech functional expressions were found in e-book entitled Developing English
Competencies 3 published by Pusat Perbukuan Depdiknas and to describe whether
the speech functional expressions were compatible with the School-Based
Curriculum. The data were the speaking materials found in the analyzed e-book.
To analyze the data, a descriptive analysis was used. The data were collected from
the e-book entitled Developing English Competencies 3. All the speaking
materials in the e-book were compared to the standard competence and basic
competence of the KTSP. The checklist analysis was done to find out their
consistency with the KTSP. The discussion focused on the consistency and
compatibility of the speaking materials with the KTSP.
From the analysis, it was found that the e-book presented the speaking
materials, but not all of the speech functional expressions set out in the curriculum
were presented in the e-book. There were 23 speech functional expressions in the
e-book in which 22 were based on the curriculum (1 of them does not present both
the materials and the review section, that is the expression of complaining, and 7
of them only present the review section, those are the expresssion of showing
attitudes, the expression of hoping, narrative text 1, explanation, discussion,
narrative text 2, and review) and 1 speech functional expression that was
presented in the e-book was not mentioned in the School-Based Curriculum, that
is the expression of discussing possibilities. The speech functional expressions of
the speaking materials were applied in transactional conversation, interpersonal
conversation, and monologues. To sum up, the speech functional expressions of
the e-book entitled Developing English Competencies 3 were compatible with the
School-Based Curriculum.
To improve the quality of the teaching-learning activities, it is suggested
that to have compatible speaking materials, the author of the book should use the
variation of speech functional expressions needed to make the learners/ students
easier in doing their daily communication. It is also suggested that the readers are
more concern with the speech functional expressions used in the speaking
materials in every textbook/e-book to be able to understand and deliver meaning
well because their sentences and utterances are properly used in daily
communication. This analysis can also be used by English teachers as their
consideration in selecting a good e-book/textbook for the teaching and learning
process.
ix
ix
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
Acknowledgements ........................................................................................ vi
Abstract .......................................................................................................... viii
Table of Contents ........................................................................................... ix
List of Tables .................................................................................................. xii
List of Figures ................................................................................................ xiii
List of Appendices ......................................................................................... xiv
Chapter
I INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background of the Study ........................................................................... 1
1.2 Reasons for Choosing the Topic ............................................................... 4
1.3 Statements of the Problem ........................................................................ 5
1.4 Objectives of the Study ............................................................................. 6
1.5 Significance of the Study .......................................................................... 6
1.6 Outline of the Study .................................................................................. 7
II REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE
2.1 Previous Studies ........................................................................................ 8
2.1.1 Penny Ur ................................................................................................ 8
2.1.2 Hasan Ansary and Esmat Babaii ............................................................ 9
2.2 Theoretical Background ............................................................................ 11
x
x
2.2.1Speaking .................................................................................................. 11
2.2.1.1 General Concepts of Speaking ............................................................ 11
2.2.1.2 The Importance of Speaking ............................................................... 12
2.2.2 Material .................................................................................................. 13
2.2.3 E-Book ................................................................................................... 17
2.2.3.1 General Textbook ................................................................................ 17
2.2.3.2 E-Book (Electronic Book)................................................................... 20
2.2.3.3 The English E-Book for XII Grade of Senior High School ................ 22
2.2.4 Curriculum ............................................................................................ 22
2.2.4.1 Definition of Curriculum..................................................................... 22
2. 2.4.2 School-Based Curriculum (KTSP) ..................................................... 24
2.2.4.3 Characteristics of School-Based Curriculum ...................................... 26
2.2.5 Speaking Based on School-Based Curriculum ...................................... 27
2.3 Theoretical Framework ............................................................................. 28
III METHODS OF INVESTIGATION
3.1 Research Approach ................................................................................... 30
3.2 Roles of the Researcher ............................................................................. 31
3.3 Object of the Study.................................................................................... 32
3.4 Data ........................................................................................................... 32
3.5 Procedure of Collecting the Data .............................................................. 32
3.4 Procedure of Analyzing Data .................................................................... 34
xi
xi
IV DATA ANALYSIS
4.1 The Data Collection .................................................................................. 36
4.2 Comparing the Speech Functional Expressionsof the E-Book and the School-
Based Curriculum .................................................................................... 37
4.3 Scoring the Checklist ................................................................................ 47
4.4Using Percentage Formula to Find out the Degree of Consistency of the
Speech Functional Expressions Found in the E-Book and those in the School-
Based Curriculum ................................................................................... 51
4.5 Evaluating the Compatibility of the Speech Functional Expressions of the E-
Book and the School-Based Curriculum .................................................. 54
V CONCLUSIONS AND SUGGESTIONS
5.1 Conclusions ............................................................................................... 56
5.2 Suggestions ............................................................................................... 57
Reference......................................................................................................... 58
Appendices ...................................................................................................... 61
xii
xii
LIST OF TABLES
Table Page
4.1 The Comparison of the Speech Functional Expressions of the Speaking
Materials Found in the KTSP and those in the E-Book ............................ 37
4.2 The Checklist of the Comparison of the Speech Functional Expressions
Found in the KTSP and those in the E-Book ............................................ 48
xiii
xiii
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure Page
4.1 Graphic Representation of the Speech Functional Expressions ................ 52
xiv
xiv
LIST OF APPENDICES
Appendix Page
1. Peny Ur‟s ELT Textbook Evaluating Schemes .......................................... 61
2. Hasan Ansary‟s Evaluation Form ............................................................... 63
3. Mapping of the Speaking Materials in the School-Based
Curriculum .................................................................................................... 65
4. Mapping of the Speaking Materials in E-Book Developing English
Competencies 3 ........................................................................................... 68
5. Textbook Analysis Instrument ................................................................... 69
6. Standard Content of English for Senior High School Grade XII of Natural and
Social Science Programmes ....................................................................... 71
7. Speaking Materials in E-Book Developing English Competencies 3 ......... 78
1
CHAPTER I
INTRODUCTION
This chapter discusses background of the study, reasons for choosing topic,
statements of the problem, objectives of the study, significance of the study, and
outline of the study.
1.1 Background of the Study
Language needs practice. That is a quotation which we often hear nearly in
everyday language teaching and learning activities. Language itself has four skills
to be mastered: listening, speaking, reading, and writing. Those four skills,
however, cannot stand alone in a language. They become a unity to reach the aim
of the use of a language then. One most important aim of the language use is to
deliver information. The aspect of the language that closely relates to this aim of
language use is speaking, which really needs practice to make someone easy in
delivering any information. In addition, speaking also helps us to express our
ideas, feelings, opinions, and wishes.
In Indonesia, English is the first foreign language to be learned. English
has been taught from the level of elementary to the highest level of education such
in a university. English is actually taught to the students of all the education levels
for many years as well, but we can never be proud of the results. Most of the
1
2
students are not able to carry on a simple conversation about their daily activities
in English.
To teach English, teachers need teaching media to help the students deliver
the materials which have been set by the government in the curriculum. One of
the teaching media that covers the demanding material is textbook. At the recent
time, the large number of published material available on the market makes
selecting the right textbook is a challenging task for the teachers. They should
examine as many textbooks as possible in the field of teaching English as a
foreign language. The chosen textbook must actually contain three components of
the curriculum, namely goals, content and method.
As the time changes to the hi-tech era, the government creates a new
alternative teaching media. Be the same as English printed textbook, electronic
books (e-book) are published by Department of National Education (Depdiknas)
for students from elementary school to senior high school. On the one hand, these
e-books can be downloaded freely at www.bse-depdiknas.co.id. and can easily be
used by either teachers or students wherever they are. On the other hand, the
qualification of the English e-book is similar to the printed textbook available.
Speaking, as discussed before, is one of the language skills that should be
taught by English teacher in every level of study not only because it is one of the
four skills in English language learning but it is also stated clearly in the
curriculum as a material to be taught. Among the four skills of English learning,
speaking is such a difficult skill to asses since it is affected by many factors like
pronunciation, grammar, vocabulary, etc. The level of difficulty of every language
3
learning is also different in each level of study. When students are at the
beginning and intermediate levels of language learning, they are still developing
their proviciency, fluency, and accuracy, which often work against together. There
are many “speech acts” (or functions) in any language, and it is important though
that the students learn the appropriate ways and materials to accomplish their
goals when they are speaking.
Dealing with the importance of the speaking materials to be taught and
the freely accessable English e-books in the internet, those two things, the
speaking materials and the freely accessable English e-books, must come within a
single tool to be used by both the English teachers and the students. In addition,
the materials within an English e-book must be compatible with the current
curriculum, namely School-Based Curriculum (KTSP).
In 2009, there was a study about the compatibility of speech functional
expressions found in English textbook with the School-Based Curriculum
conducted by Intani. She analyzed the speech functional expressions in speaking
materials found in The Bridge English Competence for Junior High School Grade
VII published by Yudhistira. The previous study analyzed how compatible the
speaking materials in the students‟ textbook. The result of the study revealed that
the speech functional expressions of the textbook were not closely compatible
with the School-Based Curriculum. There were 16 functional skills found in the
textbook that were applied in all text form; such as transactional conversation,
interpersonal conversation, short functional texts, monologues, and essays.
4
However, 8 functional skills mentioned in the School-Based Curriculum were not
presented in the textbook.
For that reason, I would like to analyze still about the speech functional
expressions, but of those which are found in an English e-book for another
graders. In this study, I choose the speech functional expressions for the twelfth
graders of senior high school containing the transactional and interpersonal
conversation and monologues as well. It is because the speaking materials for the
twelfth graders have more various speech functional expressions and are really
important to help the twelfth graders reach the information literacy level which is
one of the aims of English teaching in SMA.
Those are the reasons why this study is needed. Then, I would like to
analyze the compatibility of the speech functional expressions found in e-Book
Developing English Competencies 3 published by Pusat Perbukuan Depdiknas
with the School-Based Curriculum.
1.2 Reasons for Choosing the Topic
I have some reasons for choosing the topic of the study. The reasons can be
formulated as follows:
Among the four language skills, speaking is the most prominent one for
its use. We need to speak to everyone to communicate, to express feelings and
opinion. To reach that goal, an English teacher should make his/ her students
understand clearly and able to apply the speaking skill they learn from school.
However, learning speaking is not as easy as what many people think. It is very
5
complex and affected by many factors like the surroundings, the culture of the
learners, and even the media that is used in the teaching learning process, such as
the textbook.
Nowadays, texbooks are available in the form of electronic book. It is
mostly known as e-book. All e-books include English e-books are published
freely. One of them is an English e-book for the twelfth graders entitled
Developing English Competencies 3. For this reason, I am interested in knowing
whether it is compatible or not with the School-Based Curriculum, the newest
curriculum set by the government in the hope that it can increase the quality of
the education in Indonesia.
1.3 Statements of the Problem
In this final project, I would like to know whether the speech functional
expressions found in the e-book entitled Developing English Competencies 3
published by Pusat Perbukuan Depdiknas are compatible with the School-Based
Curriculum or not. The problems of the research are:
(1) What kinds of text models of the speech functional expressions are found in e-
book entitled Developing English Competencies 3 published by Pusat
Perbukuan Depdiknas?
(2) Are the speech functional expressions found in e-book entitled Developing
English Competencies 3 published by Pusat Perbukuan Depdiknas compatible
with the School-Based Curriculum?
6
1.4 Objectives of the Study
The general objectives of the study are:
(1) to find out the kinds of text models of the speech functional expressions found
in e-book entitled Developing English Competencies 3 published by Pusat
Perbukuan Depdiknas.
(2) to describe whether the speech functional expressions in e-book entitled
Developing English Competencies 3 published by Pusat Perbukuan
Depdiknas are compatible with the School-Based Curriculum.
1.5 Significance of the Study
(1) Theoretically
Theoretically this study will provide us with a new understanding about the
speech functional expressions found in e-book entitled Developing English
Competencies 3 published by Pusat Perbukuan Depdiknas.
(2) Practically
The results of this study will give us new information that can be used as the
consideration to select appropriate students‟e-book that will be used in the
teaching and learning English.
(3) Pedagogically
Pedagogically, the result will give us basic knowledge that can be applied in
the classroom for the students‟ development in the English learning, especially
speaking.
7
1.6 Outline of the Study
This final project is developed into five chapters. Chapter one presents
introduction. It consists of the background of the study, the reasons for choosing
the topic, the statements of the problems, the objectives of the study, the
significance of study, and the outline of study.
The second chapter presents the review of related literature, which
discusses the review of the previous studies, theoretical background and
theoretical framework.
The third chapter discusses the research approach, the roles of the
researcher, object of the study, source of data, procedure of collecting data and
procedure of analyzing data
Chapter four is the data analysis, while the last chapter explains the
conclusions and suggestions.
8
CHAPTER II
REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE
In this chapter, I would like to present three sections. They are previous studies,
theoretical background and theoretical framework.
2.1 Previous Studies
There have been a number of studies about textbook analysis, for example Ur,
(1996) and Ansary and Babii (2002). They have often offered checklists based on
supposedly generalizable criteria. These sometimes detailed check-sheets use a
variety of methods to assess how well a particular textbook under scrutiny
measures up.
To evaluate the merits or demerits of such checklist approaches to the
textbook evaluation process and for comparison purposes, two samples are
offered here: Ur's 1996 criteria for EFL/ESL course book assessment and Ansary
and Babaii‟s textbook evaluation.
2.1.1 Penny Ur
Ur (1996:186) offers a checklist with a focus and approach to EFL/ESL textbook
evaluation. A cursory look at its contents indicates that still good pronunciation
practice, good grammar presentation, grading and sequencing, cultural and
pedagogical concerns in presentation, vocabulary practice, topics being interesting
to different learners, etc. are emphasized as "grounds on which one might criticize
8
9
or reject a textbook". What if the purpose is not grammar and vocabulary
practice? For example, in this research I propose the compatibility that can be
seen from the consistency of the speech functional expressions in the speaking
skills found in the e-book with those in the curriculum as a criterion.
2.1.2 Hasan Ansary and Esmat Babaii
Besides the checklist approach offered by Ur, there is also another checlkist
approach to evaluate a textbook, that is from the internet journal. The word jurnal
is defined as “a log (or “account”) of one‟s thoughts, feelings, reactions,
assessments, ideas, or progress toward goals, usually written with little attention
to structure, form ,or correctness” (Brown, 2004: 260).
According to the article in the interenet journal by Ansary and Babii
(2002:8), evaluation essentially involves some steps. First, an evaluation form
with four columns is designed. The universal theory-neutral characteristics of
EFL/ESL textbooks appear in the first column on the form. In the second column,
however, the evaluator decides to insert his/her preferred situation-friendly
criteria. Preferences could be based on the results of students' needs analysis.
Secondly, two separate scores may serve as the basis for rating:
(1) A perfect value score (PVS) of 2 which appears in the third column indicating
an ideal weight assigned to each defined criterion.
(2) A merit score (MS) consisting of numbers 0 to 2 which appears in the fourth
column on the form. A comparative weight is assigned to the relative
realization in the textbook under scrutiny of each actual criterion: a perfect
match between the ideal defined criterion and its actual realization in a
10
particular textbook receiving 2, a total lack a score of 0, and any inadequate
match a score of 1.
Finally, the numbers in the MS and PVS columns after each criterion are
represented on a graph by drawing (1) a dotted line corresponding to the
numerical value of the Merit Scores, and (2) a straight solid line to represent the
Perfect Value Scores.
This framework has a dual utility. On the one hand, if the evaluations of
several raters should be compared and contrasted in order to reach a correlated
consensus, several opinions of a single textbook can be easily displayed on the
same graph. On the other hand, an evaluator can display his judgments about
several textbooks on a single graph using a separate line for each textbook. In this
way, he may compare the profiles of various textbooks, see them in contrast to the
ideal solid line, and judge how far a particular textbook can satisfy his
requirements. If this is done, not only are the differences among various textbooks
portrayed, but also any instances of marked variation can be noted and revised.
Furthermore, this two-tier system can be approached in two distinct ways.
An evaluator may first examine a particular textbook to identify its characteristics
and then s/he may judge it against his/her preferred criteria. Or an evaluator can
first define his/her preferred options, and then s/he may investigate how far a
particular textbook matches his/her preferred criteria.
11
2.2 Theoretical Background
In this theoretical background, there will be some explanations about speaking,
material, e-book, curriculum, and speaking based on School-Based Curriculum.
2.2.1 Speaking
We need to speak to interact with others and to express our feelings, opinions, etc.
People in the world speak in their own language. Whatever the language we use,
the essence of speaking is that the meaning or the information from one person
can be delivered to the others.
2.2.1.1 General Concept of Speaking
Learning any language has to do with the four skills have to be mastered. The four
skills are listening, speaking, reading, and writing. Those skills are devided into
two kinds of skills, namely receptive and productive skills. Listening and reading
are receptive skills, while speaking ang writing are the productive one. Among
those skills, speaking is the one that we do not stop to analyse unless there is
something noticeable about it.
Nunan (2003:48) states about speaking as follows:
“Many people feel that speaking in a new language is harder than
reading, writing, and listening for two reasons. First, unlike reading,
speaking happens in real time: usually the person you are talking to is
waiting for you to speak right then. Second, when you speak, you cannot
edit and revise what you wish to say, as you can if you are writing.”
Speaking skill is the ability to use language in oral form. In the junior high
school level, this skill is limited to the ability to conduct a simple conversation on
some subjects. In the level of senior high school, however, the students need to be
able to access the knowledge by linguistic ability on some subjects i.e. making
suggestions, requests, complaints, instructions, etc.
12
According to Oxford Advanced Learner‟s Dictionary (1995), “speaking is
making use of words in an ordinary voice; uttering words, knowing and being able
to use a language expressing one self in words; making a speech”. While skill is
the ability to do something well. In conclusion, the definition of speaking skill
lexically is the ability to utter words or sounds with the ordinary voice or the
ability to communicate vocally or to have conversation through practice, training
or talent. Moreover, someone who wants to speak a foreign language has to know
the rules of that language, for example, grammar, vocabulary pronunciation,
word-formation, and apply them properly in communication.
2.2.1.2 The Importance of Speaking
Everywhere we go, we find language, includes English language. Nowadays,
there are often a lot of English words we can see when walking on the street,
especially on the big cities like in the shops, streets, advertisements, or notices on
buses or trains. It happens nearly in most countries in the world, since they are not
English speaking countries though.
Language plays an important role in our life. We cannot live without any
languages to communicate. We need language to reveal any ideas, opinions,
wishes and feelings in both spoken and written form. It is hard to imagine how
people can get along with one onother without any languages. We can understand
and take information from others by using it. Oral communication do provides the
base for growth in reading, writing, and listening abilities.
Seely (1995) states that “speech serves two important functions in the
classroom: the social and intellectual” (http://www.sasklearning.gov.sk.ca/docs
13
/mla/speak.html). As a social function, speech helps the students to adjust ideas
and ideas are formulated to facilitate their understanding. Within this functions,
the students share information and ideas with listeners by speaking informally and
sharing through conversation. Speech is also used to form relationships through
the language.
There are two kinds of speech, informal and formal. The informal speech
occurs when a person is talking to his family or close friends. He speaks
spontaneously and freely to them. His speech is likely to include some slang
expressions, while the formal speech occurs when a person speaks before a group,
when he speaks to his boss in the office or if we speak to someone elder than us.
Speech, as an intellectual function, shapes students‟ perceptions of the
world and represents these perceptions as knowledge. Speech encourages the
students to reproduce and transform knowledge as they shift through observation,
evaluate information, and compare views. Speech that transforms knowledge
increases critical thinking abilities and attentions of students.
2.2.2 Material
As it is difficult to learn a language, it has some components to make the learning
process done well. There are five components in the language learning, they are
students, a teacher, materials, teaching methods and evaluation. Among those
components, students are the center of the learning, a teacher, who has the role as
the agent of knowledge, is the facilitator. S/he must ascertain that the what so
called material is delivered and accepted clearly by the students. Teaching
methods and the evaluation are also essential in the language learning.
14
One of the five components which is also important in the language
learning is the material. Basically, materials are the important resource for the
teacher in assisting his/her students to learn a language, includes English.
Materials serve as one of the main instruments for shaping knowledge, attitudes,
and principles of our young people. For most teachers, materials provide the
foundation for the content of the lessons, the balance of the skills taught, as well
as the kinds of language practice the students engage during the class activities.
Materials include textbook (both printed and commercially produced and
electronic book freely accessed via internet), video, audio tapes, computer
software, and visual aids. They influence the content and the procedures of the
learning. While technology such as OHP, slides, video and audio tape recorders,
video cameras, and computers are equipments that support instruction in the
learning.
As what is discussed previously, the students are the center of the learning
process. In many cases, however, the teachers and the students rely on the
materials, and the materials become the center of the learning. Sometimes, the
teachers are busy and do not have time. They just tend to use textbook and other
commercially produced materials in doing the learning process rather than prepare
extra materials for teaching by themselves. Thus, it is important for the teachers to
know how to choose the best materials for instruction, how to make
supplementary materials for the class, and how to adapt materials.
15
According to Kitao (1997), there are three elements that have to be noticed
in constructing materials of a textbook (http://iteslj.org/Articles/Kitao-
Materials.html). They are:
(1) Language
The materials of English textbooks should have correct, natural, recent, and
Standard English. Since students‟ vocabulary is limited, the vocabulary in the
textbooks should be controlled or the textbook should provide information to help
students understand the vocabulary that they may not be familiar with. For lower-
level students, grammar should also be controlled. Many textbooks use narratives
and essays. It would be useful to have a variety of literary form (for example,
newspaper articles, poetry, or letters), so that the students can learn to deal with
different forms.
(2) Information of culture
The cultural information included in English textbook should be correct and
recent. It should not be biased and should reflect background cultures of English.
It should include visual aids, to help students understand cultural information.
(3) Form learners‟ viewpoints
Content English textbook should be useful, meaningful and interesting for the
students. While no single subject will be of interest to all students, materials
should be chosen based, in part, on what students, in general, are likely to find
interesting and motivating.
16
As a general rule, materials should be slightly higher in their level of
difficulty than the students‟ current level of English proficiency. It allows them to
learn new grammatical structure and vocabulary.
English textbook should have clear instructional procedure and methods,
that is, the teacher and the students should be able to understand what is expected
in each lesson and for each activity.
Textbooks should have support for the learning. This can take the form of
vocabulary lists, exercises which cover or expand on the content, visual aids, etc.
with the development of technology, photos, visual materials, and audio materials
have become very important components of language teaching materials, and they
are becoming easier to obtain. Materials are getting complicated, and instructional
philosophy, approach, methods, and technique are getting more important too.
Though there are five components in language instruction, they are
students, a teacher, materials, teaching methods and evaluation, learners that
should be the center of the instruction. However, materials often control the
instruction, since the teachers and the students tend to rely heavily on them. The
materials which are appropriate for a special class need to have an underlying
instructional philosophy, approach, and methods and technique which suit the
students and their needs. They should be correct, natural and current, and have
Standard English. The teachers need to look for good materials, both commercial
and non-commercial, all the time.
17
2.2.3 E-Book
The advancement of technology can change everything in this world, including
textbook. Nowadays, we can read the textbooks not only in the printed form, but
also in the form of electronic content of textbook, namely electronic book or e-
book. The internet gives us freedom to freely access the e-book which we can
make use of it. The following explanation will discuss more about the general
textbook (printed texbook) and the e-book (electronic book).
2.2.3.1 General Textbook
Textbook in general has many definitions and functions. The definitions and the
functions of textbook are as follows.
a. Definition of Textbook
In daily teaching, textbook is very crucial. A textbook is the accompaniment for
the teacher during the lesson is going on. It consists of the resume of what the
teacher teaches. There are so many textbooks that can be used by both the teachers
and the students. By this condition, a teacher should be able to choose and decide
which textbook he should use and how he should do with it.
There are many definitions of textbook. Thanasoulas (1999) states that “a
textbook is looked upon as an indispensable vehicle for foreign language”
(http://www.englishclub.com/tefl-articles/textbook.htm). To be able to master a
new language, the students or the learners do need some helps. Textbook may be
the tool for them to reach their goal in learning a foreign language. Having a
textbook on their hands will make the learners feel secure and have a sense of
progress and achievement. Moreover, a textbook provides them with the
18
opportunity to go back and revise. They also can use the textbook for self-study
and as a reference tool. A textbook is certainly held in high regard by the anxious
teacher who tried to put his or her message across, to teach the necessarily
vocabulary and help the students to acquire and consolidate the four skills:
listening, speaking, reading, and writing.
In addition to the above explanation, Gabrielatos (2000) in his article “The
Textbook as a Flexible Tool” states that “teachers as a Bible, a guide, a crutch, a
necessary evil, or a burden have variously regarded as a textbook. It is a helpful
tool that teachers can use flexibly, and combine with other resource” (http://www.
Gabrielatos.com/CB-use.htm). In order to use a textbook systematically and
flexibly, it is important to understand how it is put together and how it can be
adapted to meet the needs of the particular learners. The textbook provides a plan
for learning, a visible outline of what is to be learned in the classroom as a bank of
resource materials and ideas (Nunan 2003: 226). What happen in the classroom
fills out and transforms the outline into learning experiences for the students.
Textbook and teacher are such the components of a teaching-learning
process that should have a good relation. There must be a partnership between
them. The aim of the textbook should correspond as closely as possible to the
aims of the teacher, and both should seek to meet the needs of the learners to the
highest degree. The partnership is helped when aims and objectives are well
defined, and when the difference but complementary roles of the teacher and the
textbook are clearly perceived and well balanced.
19
b. The Functions of Textbook
According to Brown and Harcleroad (1983:384), a textbook has many functions
as follows:
(1) Individualization of Instruction
A textbook helps students to individualize instruction by enabling them to
proceed at their own rate and to a limited extent, according to what they are
interested in studying.
(2) Organization of Instruction
A textbook helps students to organize instruction by providing them
experiences, suggested activities, recommended reading and question.
Written textbooks give unity to classroom interaction and are graded to
introduce new concepts or contents they build upon what has preceded.
(3) Tutorial Contribution
A teacher often uses the textbooks to help students learn how to read better,
to study, to weigh evidence, and to solve problems.
(4) Improvement of Teaching
Textbook is also regarded as a helpful utility which is used by teachers to
improve their skills in teaching.
By concerning to the function stated above, I conclude that the function of
a textbook is actually one of the visual aids used by teachers when they teach and
explain the teaching materials. It also helps the students in getting a better
understanding of the materials given by teacher.
20
2.2.3.2 E-Book (Electronic Book)
Electronic book has become one of the choices of many people to be used as their
reading. Electronic book is also available for the students in every level of
educations. In addition, the electronic book or e-book must be compatible with the
School-Based Curriculum.
a. Definition of Electronic Book
The term „e-book‟ stands for electronic book. Moreover, according to Dhir (2004:
394),
“The e-book is an electronic version of content normally contained in
newspaper, magazine, or book. The content is created and stored in
computer file format that can be accessed by a variety of computer
hardware and software applications. E-book can be downloaded from the
web or received as an email file attachment.”
The e-book used in this study was a textbook. Furthermore, “the textbook
is a reference book which has purpose to summarize knowledge” (Mc Tighe and
Wiggins 2005:311). According to Carr (2001:44), “textbook can be defined as
materials distributed by a publisher as a set of instructional materials directed to
particular grade or unit levels or levels and are/or to particular subject.”
From the explanation above, it can be concluded that e-book which is
used in this study is an electronic textbook which contains materials used in
teaching and learning process.
In addition, there are some purposes of publishing electronic textbook
(BSE) according to the Department of the National Education. They are:
(1) giving alternative sources for the students,
21
(2) leading the students to be creative by the use of information and
communication technology,
(3) giving the freedom for people to print, copy, and sell it without many difficult
administration, and
(4) giving a business chance for everyone that sells the book by the advantage up
to 15% according to the minister.
b. The Compatibility of Electronic Book
According to Oxford Advanced Learner‟s Dictionary (1995), compatibility comes
from the word “compatible”. Compatible means able to coexist; well-suited,
consistent, and able to be used in combination. According to Cambridge
Advanced Learner‟s Dictionary, compatible means able to exist, live together, or
work successfully with something or someone else.
From the various definitions of compatibility, it is concluded that
compatibility is the consistency of something to its comparator. In the teaching
learning process the teachers have to use the electronic book as a reference. The e-
book can be said to be compatible when it contains the materials that are
mentioned in the curriculum. In fact, there are so many electronic books which are
not compatible with the current curriculum, that is the School-Based Curriculum.
Thus, a teacher should select the electronic books as the primary, complementary
or supplementary materials for the students which are compatible with the School-
Based Curriculum.
22
2.2.3.3 The English E-Book for XII Grade of Senior High School
There are many choises of English electronic books that can be used by the
twelfth grade of senior high school students. Among them, I choose an English e-
book entitled Developing English Competencies 3 published by Pusat Perbukuan
Depdiknas to be analyzed.
Some textbooks claimed in their cover that they are adjusted to the School-
Based Curriculum and also cover the four language skills, includes speaking skill.
It makes me interested in analysing whether they are really compatible with the
School-Based Curriculum or not.
2.2.4 Curriculum
Every teaching/learning program needs a curriculum. Curriculum is considered to
be the main source and the main guide for the teachers in the teaching/learning
activities. It contains instructional goals, teaching method and teaching material
that have to be followed by the teachers. The following are some relevant issues
about the curriculum.
2.2.4.1 Definition of Curriculum
Curriculum is the basis for doing teaching-learning activities. A teacher should
know the curriculum before he teaches his students, as curriculum has been made
on the basis of students‟ need. Considering the importance of the curriculum, I
will discuss further about the curriculum.
According to Oxford Advanced Learner‟s Dictionary of Current English,
“curriculum is the subjects included in a course of study or taught at a particular
school, college, etc.” (Hornby 1995:287).
23
From the definition above, it may mean that a study in schools, colleges,
universities, and some other institutions should be relevant to the curriculum.
As background information for second and foreign language course
designers, a brief review of a few of the outstanding contribution to the general
curriculum planning literature is warranted.
Skager (1977: 23) states in his book:
“The term of “curriculum” is used at various levels of inclusiveness in
educational discourse. Sometimes it refers only to a set of guidelines as
to the content of instruction, in other cases to curriculum plans which
may be quite detailed in the sense of incorporating specifications as to
instructional objectives, content, and methods. But written plans and
guidelines, no matter how detailed, represent a relatively restricted
concept of the curriculum.”
Furthermore, Pratt (1980: 4) reveals a curriculum as “an organized set of
formal educational and/or training intentions.” He also explains the implications
of the above definition need to be made explicit. They are:
(1) A curriculum is intention, or plans.
(2) A curriculum is not activities but plans, or a blueprint, for activities.
(3) A curriculum contains many other kinds of intentions, such as what learning
students are to develop, the means of evaluation to be used to assess learning,
the criteria according to which students will be admitted to the qualities
required to teacher.
(4) A curriculum involves formal intentions, which intentions are deliberately
chosen to promote learning; it does not include random, unplanned, or non-
learning activities.
24
(5) As an organized set of intention, a curriculum articulates the relationships
among its different elements (objectives, content, evaluation, etc.), integrating
them into a unified and coherent whole.
(6) Both education and training are referred to in the definition to avoid the
misunderstanding that occurs of one is omitted.
From the illustration above, I conclude that a curriculum is a subject
included in a course of study which is taught at a particular school, college,
(Hornby, 1995: 287), a set of formal educational and/or training intentions (Pratt
1980: 4), and also a kind of guidance that is developed to make teaching-learning
activities progress well (Skager, 1977: 23).
2.2.4.2 School-Based Curriculum (KTSP)
Realizing that there are so many changes happen in Indonesian community, the
government, that is Department of National Education, reformed the curriculum
that has been used since 1954. There have been several English curriculums. They
are the 1954 curriculum, the 1968 curriculum, the 1975 curriculum, the 1984
curriculum, the 1994 curriculum, the KBK as the sources for English teaching
activities. And the latest curriculum applied is the KTSP (Kurikulum Tingkat
Satuan Pendidikan).
The main goal in reforming the curriculum is to increase the education
quality. The standards that should be achieved are that the graduate students have
the capabilities, knowledge and manners that can be useful for the next, either
when they apply for a job or when they want to continue their studies.
25
According to Standar Nasional Pendidikan (SNP chapter 1, article 15)
School Based Curriculum (KTSP) is an operational curriculum which is
constructed and run by each unit of education. The unit of education constructs
the KTSP based on the competence standard and basic competence (SKKD)
which have been developed by Badan Standar Nasional Pendidikan (BSNP).
The KTSP is constructed considering the following reasons:
(1) UU No. 20 Th.2003 about Sisdiknas;
(2) PP No. 19 Th. 2005 about Standar Nasional Pendidikan;
(3) Permendiknas No. 22 Th. 2006 about Standar Isi;
(4) Permendiknas No. 23 Th. 2006 about Standar Kompetensi Lulusan;
(5) Permendiknas No. 24 Th.2006 about the application of Permendiknas no. 22
and 23.
Moreover, KTSP is developed based on these principles:
(1) Focused on the potention, development, need, and the interest and the
environment of the students
(2) Various and united
(3) Respond to the development of sciences, technologies, and arts
(4) Relevant with the need of life
(5) Troughout and continued
(6) Long life education
(7) Balance with the national interest and the region interest.
There are four components included in School-Based Curriculum, they
are:
26
(1) The education goal of the education unit (elementary, junior and senior level)
(2) The structure and curriculum contents (containing subject matters, local
content, self-development, arrangement of the study materials, criterion of
study completeness, criterion of class promotion and graduation, life skill
education, and education on the basis of local and global)
(3) Education calendar
(4) Enclosure (annual program, syllabus, lesson plan, standard competence, basis
competence, self-development program, and other instruments; for example
mapping basis competence or indicator)
2.2.4.3 Characteristics of School-Based Curriculum (KTSP)
KTSP is an operational form of developing curriculum in a desentralitation
context of education and area autonomy, that will give a new knowledge to the
system being run. The characteristics of KTSP can be known from how school
and unit of education can optimalize working, learning process, managing source
of learning, professional teacher, and also the marking system. The explanations
about the characteristics of KTSP are as follows:
(1) Giving wide autonomy to the headmaster and education unit
KTSP gives a wide autonomy to the headmaster and education unit, with all
responsibilities to develop curriculum appropriate with the school condition.
(2) High participation of parents and community
In KTSP, practising curriculum must be supported by participation of parents
and community. Parents of students and community do not only support
school through financial support, but also through school commitee and
27
education council formulate and develop programs that can improve the
quality of learning.
(3) Democratic and professional leadership
Developing and running curriculum are supported by school‟s democratic and
professional leadership. Headmaster together with teachers as the organizer of
curriculum are people who have an ability and professional integrity.
(4) Cohesive and transparant work-team
Succesful in developing and running curriculum is suported by the cohesive
and transparant work-team. In education council and school commitee, all
side work together without any authority.
2.2.5 Speaking Based on School-Based Curriculum
English is a mean of communication both in spoken and written language.
Communication is about the understanding and comprehending the information,
mind, feeling and developing the knowledge, technology, and culture. The
comprehension completely can be defined as discourse competence, i.e. the
comprehension of mastering or producing spoken or written text which is realized
on four skills: listening, speaking, reading, and writing.
For all teaching situations, all four skills do not have to be treated in depth
in balance because different teaching situations require different emphasis on
each skill. The teaching learning process of English in senior high school,
especially the speaking skill, is concerned in the learners‟ ability to communicate
in English in daily life to reach informational literacy level.
28
In all contexts, people use the language in order to complete the function
or to get the prominent meaning. Moreover, the School-Based Curriculum in the
speaking skill is also directed to complete the function above. Teaching speaking
based on the School-Based Curriculum emphasizes on building up the
negotiation. By negotiation it is hoped that the students are able to build up a
spoken text. A spoken text is about the unity of the meaning and semantic units.
There are three functions of speaking:
(1) Ideational function
It is the language function which is used in order to construct the idea or
information.
(2) Interpersonal function
It is the language function which is used in order to interact with others and
express the speech acts, behaviors, feeling, etc.
(3) Textual function
It is the function in how the text or language which is composed are reconstruct,
so it can reach the cohesion and coherence, then it is used to make the language
easy to be understood by learners or the reader. (Departemen Pendidikan
Nasional 2004: 98)
2.3 Theoretical Framework
Based on the function above, it is very important to select a good textbook so that
the textbook can help the students easily understand the materials which the
teacher gives. In this study, I analyzed the speech functional expressions found in
29
the e-book. The speech functional expressions would be compared with the
School-Based Curriculum. After data were categorized, then I would analyze the
data using the instrument namely textbook analysis instrument. This instrument is
adopted from Ansary‟s textbook evaluation form. I would show whether the e-
book is really compatible with the curriculum or not.
30
CHAPTER III
METHODS OF INVESTIGATION
This chapter will describe in detail the method of investigation. It is divided into
several parts. They are research approach, the roles of the researcher, object of the
study, source of data, procedure of collecting data and procedure of analyzing
data.
3.1 Research Approach
This research is a qualitative research. I used the descriptive method in which the
data were analyzed and the analysis result was formed descriptively or as
phenomenon, not investigating the numerals or about the inter-variable
relationship.
Nawawi (1993: 63) points out that “descriptive method is a solving-
procedure which is searched by describing/drawing the condition of the
investigating subject/object (i.e.: someone, institution, community, etc) at present
time according to the visible facts or as the way it is.”
This study, therefore, is an effort to solve problems by comparing the
similarities and the differences found in the symptoms, measuring the symptoms
found, and so on. In other words, the descriptive method is steps to objectively
represent the symptoms existed in the research problems.
30
31
Nawawi (1993: 64) also explains that the descriptive method should focus
on the following characteristics:
(1) Focusing on the current or the actual problems, and
(2) Describing facts about the problems using the rational adequate
interpretation.
3.2 Roles of the Researcher
Research is a complex process done by the researcher from the beginning up to
end. In analyzing the data, I did several kinds of role, as follows:
(1) Data identifier
After choosing the object of the study, then I read it carefully, and then I
identified the data. Here, I chose the materials whether they were the data or
not.
(2) Data collector
In this case, I gathered the speaking skills materials.
(3) Data organizer
After collecting the data, I organized them through mapping and comparing. It
helped me in analyzing the data.
(3) Data analyst
I tried to analyze the speaking skill materials displayed on Developing English
Competencies 3 for Senior High School Students Year XII published by Pusat
Perbukuan Depdiknas, whether it is compatible with School-Based
Curriculum or not by describing them.
32
3.3 Object of the Study
The object of this study was the compatibility of speech functional expressions
found in an English e-book entitled Developing English Competencies 3 with the
School-Based Curriculum (KTSP). The e-book was for Senior High School
Students Year XII published by Pusat Perbukuan Depdiknas in 2008.
3.4 Data
The data understudies were the speaking materials found in the analyzed e-book.
In speaking, there are transactional and interpersonal conversation in daily life
context and monologue texts in the form of narrative, explanation, discussion, and
review.
3.5 Procedure of Collecting the Data
An instrument in a research will influence the data which has been obtained.
According to Saleh (2001:31), “the term „instrument‟ means equipment for
collecting the data.” Based on those statements, an instrument is very significant
for gathering the data accurately.
The data for this study were collected by using checklist as the instrument.
The following presents the description of the instruments.
At first, I made a table to compare the speech functional expressions found
in the curriculum and the speech functional expressions found in the e-book.
After data were categorized, then I analyzed the data using the instrument
namely textbook analysis instrument. This instrument was adopted from Ansary‟s
33
textbook evaluation form. The following presents the description of the textbook
analysis instrument.
The evaluation involved the following steps. First, an evaluation form with
four columns was designed (see appendix 5). The speech functional expressions in
the KTSP appeared in the first column on the form. In the second column, I
inserted the speech functional expressions in the e-book. Secondly, two separate
scores might serve as the basis for rating:
(1) A perfect value score (PVS) of 2 which appeared in the third column indicated
an ideal weight assigned to each defined criterion.
(2) A merit score (MS) consisting of numbers 0 to 2 appeared in the fourth
column on the form. A comparative weight was assigned to the relative
realization in the textbook under scrutiny of each actual criterion: a perfect
match between the ideal defined criterion and its actual realization in a
particular textbook receiving 2, a total lack a score of 0, and any inadequate
match a score of 1.
Then, the numbers in the MS and PVS columns after each criterion were
represented on a graph by drawing (1) a dotted line corresponding to the
numerical value of the Merit Scores, and (2) a straight solid line to represent the
Perfect Value Scores.
34
3.6 Procedure of Analyzing the Data
After collecting the data, the next step was I analyzed the whole data obtained.
This data analysis was actually analyzing the instrument that made a reality
without changing or breaking any instrument. In this study, the data analysis was
meant to know how compatible is the speech functional expressions found in the
English e-book and the School-Based Curriculum; whether the e-book is
consistent or not with the School-Based Curriculum, as stated in the standard
competence and basic competence.
I used a qualitative data analysis in analyzing the data. In this study, I took
three steps. Those were selecting, comparing, and interpreting the data.
(1) Selecting the Data
I selected the data by choosing the English textbook entitled Developing English
Competencies 3 for Senior High School Students Year XII published by Pusat
Perbukuan Depdiknas.
(2) Comparing the Data
After selecting the data, I mapped and compared the data to make the process of
analysis easier. In this study, I made two tables to map the data and a table to
compare them. (See appendix 3 and 4)
After data were compared, then I analyzed the data using the instrument I
had made before. (See appendix 5)
(3) Interpreting the Data
Finally, I analyzed the data by giving interpretation of the compatibility between
the English e-book entitled Developing English Competencies 3 for Senior High
35
School Students Year XII published by Pusat Perbukuan Depdiknas with the
standard competence and basic competence of the KTSP. In this study, I analyzed
the consistency of the speaking skill of the e-book compared with the KTSP to
interpret the data.
To score the degree of consistency of the e-book with the KTSP, I used the
percentage descriptive analysis with the following formula:
The percentage of
consistency
Total number of functional skills in
the e-book
= X 100%
Total number of functional skills in
the KTSP
According to Retmono cited by Anggraeni (2009: 29), “there must be a
minimum demand of the KTSP in the textbook”. The writer has made some
criteria of consistency of textbook with the KTSP that was analyzed by using
Ansary‟s textbook evaluation form as follows:
(1) A textbook is said to be VERY CLOSELY CONSISTENT with the KTSP if
the total percentage of the functional skills are more than 71%.
(2) A textbook is said to be NOT CLOSELY CONSISTENT with the KTSP if
the total percentage of the functional skills are less than 71%.
36
CHAPTER IV
DATA ANALYSIS
In this chapter, I would like to present the analysis of the data dealing with the
compatibility of speech functional expressions found in e-book Developing
English Competencies 3 which was published by Pusat Perbukuan Depdiknas. I
would like to describe whether the speech functional expressions are compatible
or not with the School-Based Curriculum, by examining the speech functional
expressions in the speaking materials of the e-book and the curriculum.
4.1 The Data Collection
I did some preparations to analyze the data, they were:
(1) Comparing the speech functional expressions of the e-book and the school-
based curriculum (KTSP),
(2) Scoring the checklist,
(3) Using percentage formula to find out the degree of the consistency of speech
functional expressions found in the e-book and those in the School-Based
Curriculum, and
(4) Evaluating the compatibility of the speech functional expressions of the e-
book and the School-Based Curriculum.
36
37
4.2 Comparing the Speech Functional Expressions of the E-Book
and the School-Based Curriculum (KTSP)
After mapping the speech functional expressions of the e-book and the KTSP, it
was very important for me to see the differences between the two findings. In
order to give a clear view of those differences, I used the following table.
Table 4.1
The Comparison of the Speech Functional Expressions of the Speaking Materials
Found in the KTSP and those in the E-Book
Smt No.
Speech Functional
Expressions of the
Speaking Materials
in the KTSP
Speech Functional
Expressions
of the Speaking Materials in
the E-Book
Comments
1 1. Making Suggestions
Making Suggestion:
You could (might) ....
I suggest/ recommended
that you .....
You really should/ ought to
....
I strongly advise/ urge to
you to ....
You‟d better ....
[chapter 1, page 8]
Accepting Suggestion:
That‟s a good/ nice/
wonderful, idea/
suggestion.
Thank you/ Thank‟s. I‟ll
do/ try that.
It is compatible
because the e-
book presents
the materials
and review
about “Making
Suggestion”.
The e-book
gives examples
of how to make
a suggestion,
and how to
accept and reject
it to be applied
in a real
situation.
38
Why didn‟t I think of that?
I think you are right.
[chapter 1, page 8]
Rejecting Suggestion:
I tried that, but ....
Thank‟s, but that won‟t
work/ help because ....
I don‟t want to/ can‟t do
that because ....
That‟s a good idea, but ....
[chapter 1, page 8]
1 2. Requesting Requesting:
Would you mind ...,
please?
Can/ could you ...?
Can you tell me what
happened?
Will/ Would you ...?
Please ....
[chapter 1, page 8]
Accepting Request:
Sure, I‟d be glad/ happy to
....
Of course/ Certainly.
No problem.
Sure. Just a moment.
[chapter 1, page 8]
Refusing Request:
I‟d love to, but, ....
I sounds great, but ....
I‟m sorry, but ....
It is compatible
because the e-
book presents
the materials
and review
about
“Requesting”.
The e-book
gives the
examples of
how to request
someone to do
something, and
how to accept
and refuse it.
39
Sorry to say that ....
[chapter 1, page 8]
1 3. Complaining -
It is not
compatible
because the e-
book does not
present both the
materials and
review/tests
about
“Complaining”
as what is
mentioned in the
School-Based
Curriculum.
1 4.
Giving Instructions
Giving Instructions:
Open page 10 of this book.
Give me that story book.
Read this paragraph
loudly.
Write your own story.
[chapter 1, page 8]
It is compatible
because the e-
book presents
the materials
and review
about “Giving
Instructions”.
Moreover, there
are some
examples of
giving
instructions to
someone.
1 5. Admitting Doing
Something Wrong
Expressions for Admitting
Doing Something Wrong:
I admit to (doing
something).
I admit that I ....
I confess to (something).
[chapter 2, page 36]
It is compatible
because the e-
book presents
the materials
and review
about
“Admitting
Doing
Something
Wrong”.
40
The examples
given in the e-
book make the
students
understand the
materials
clearly.
1 6. Making a Promise/
Swearing
Expressions for Making a
Promise:
I promise/ swear that I ....
I promise you that ....
I swear (to do something).
[chapter 2, page 36]
It is compatible
because the e-
book presents
the materials by
giving some
examples, and
review about
“Making a
Promise/
Swearing”.
1 7. Blaming and
Accusing
Expressions for Blaming and
Accusing:
You are the one to blame.
I think you‟re the only
person who could have
done it.
It‟s your fault.
It‟s your fault for (doing
something).
[chapter 21, page 36]
It is compatible
because the e-
book presents
the materials
and review
about “Blaming
and Accusing”.
The e-book
actually does not
give the
examples of
expressions for
accusing.
1 8. Expressing Curiousity Saying You Are Curious:
What I‟d really like to find
out is ....
I‟d be very interested to
know ....
I‟ve been meaning to ask
It is compatible
because the e-
book presents
the materials
and review
about
“Expressing
Curiousity”.
41
you.
I‟d like to know ....
I wish I knew ....
I‟d love to know ....
What‟s on your mind?
I wonder ...?
[chapter 3, page 60]
The e-book
gives examples
of how to
express our
curiousity about
everything
around us.
1 9. Showing Attitudes -
It is not
compatible with
the School-
Based
Curriculum.
The e-book does
not present the
materials and
the examples. It
only presents the
review tests
about “Showing
Attitudes”.
1 Discussing
Possibilities
Expressions for Discussing
Possibilities:
• Do you think we are capable
of …?
• Would there be any
possibility of …?
• Would it be possible for
(somebody) to …?
• I think that would be
possible ....
• Is it possible to …?
It is not
compatible.
The materials
given in the e-
book about
“Discussing
Possibilities” are
not mentioned in
the School-
Based
Curriculum.
In contrast, the
e-book also
presents the
examples and
review tests.
42
• Yes, there is a possibility ....
[chapter 3, page 60]
1 10. Narrative 1 -
It is not
compatible.
There should be
the materials
about “Narrative
Text” in the e-
book as what
have already
been mentioned
in the School-
Based
Curriculum, not
only the review
section.
1 11. Explanation -
It is not
compatible.
There should be
the materials
about
“Explanation
Text” in the e-
book as what
have already
been mentioned
in the School-
Based
Curriculum, not
only the review
tests.
1 12. Discussion -
It is not
compatible.
There should be
the materials
43
about
“Discussion
Text” in the e-
book as what
have already
been mentioned
in the School-
Based
Curriculum, not
only the review
section.
2 13. Persuading Expressions for Persuading:
Would it be possible for
you to ...?
Won‟t you ..., please?
Why don‟t you ...?
Please!
Not even for me/ for my
sake?
Just this once!
You‟re not going to let me
down, are you?
How I can persuade you to
...?
Could you/ Couldn‟t you
be persuaded ...?
[chapter 4, page 97]
It is compatible
because the e-
book presents
the materials
and review tests
about
“Persuading”.
The examples of
how to persuade
someone to do
something are
given in the e-
book.
2 14. Encouraging Expressions for
Encouraging:
Come on ....
Don‟t give up.
Go on!
Keep at it!
Keep it up!
You can do it!
Stick to it!
It is compatible
because the e-
book presents
the materials
and review tests
about
“Encouraging”.
The e-book
gives example
of how to
44
Don‟t worry, I‟m sure
you‟ll do better this time.
[chapter 4, page 97]
encourage
someone in a
real situation.
2 15. Hoping -
It is not
compatible.
There should be
the materials
about “Hoping”
in the e-book as
what have
already been
mentioned in the
School-Based
Curriculum, not
only the test
section.
2 16. Criticising and
Deterring
Expressions for Advising
Someone Not to do
Something (Deterring):
I wouldn‟t do that if I were
you.
If I were in your position, I
wouldn‟t ....
I wouldn‟t ... if I were in
your shoes.
You would be well advised
to / not to ....
If I were you I wouldn‟t ....
The way I see it, you
should/ shouldn‟t ....
I wouldn‟t recommended
....
I wouldn‟t advise ....
I don‟t think you ought to
....
I don‟t think you should ....
It is compatible.
The e-book
presents the
materials and
review tests
about
“Expressions for
Advising
Someone Not to
do Something
(Deterring)”.
45
[chapter 4, page 97]
2 17. Expressing Regret Expressing Regret:
If I had (hadn‟t) ..., I would
(wouln‟t) have ....
I regret doing ....
I regret ....
I wish ....
[chapter 5, page 125]
It is compatible.
The e-book
presents the
materials and
review tests
about
“Expressing
Regret”.
The examples of
how to express
regret are given
in the e-book.
2 18. Predicting and
Speculating
Predicting and Speculating:
We can speculate that ....
I would say ....
I predict that ....
[chapter 5, page 125]
The e-book is
compatible with
the School-
Based
Curriculum.
It presents the
materials,
examples and
review tests
about
“Predicting and
Speculating”.
2 19. Judging Making A Judgement:
It‟s ... (amazing, awesome,
etc).
It‟s ... (boring, unexciting,
poorly written, etc).
It‟s a/ an ... (touching
story, inspiring book, etc).
[chapter 5, page 125]
The e-book is
compatible with
the School-
Based
Curriculum.
It presents the
materials,
examples and
review tests
about “Making
46
A Judgement”.
2 20. Giving or Asking
Plans, Intention, and
Purposes
Expressing Plans, Intention,
and Purposes:
Do you have any plans ...?
What do we want to
achieve?
What‟s the plan?
Is that what you want?
[chapter 5, page 125]
The e-book is
compatible with
the School-
Based
Curriculum.
It presents the
materials,
examples and
review tests
about “Giving or
Asking Plans,
Intention, and
Purposes”.
2 21. Narrative 2 -
It is not
compatible.
There should be
the materials
about “Narrative
Text” in the e-
book as what
have already
been mentioned
in the School-
Based
Curriculum, not
only the test
section.
2 22. Review -
It is not
compatible.
There should be
the materials
about “Review
Text” in the e-
book as what
have already
been mentioned
47
in the School-
Based
Curriculum, not
only the test
section.
4.3 Scoring the Checklist
In scoring the checklist, two separate scores may serve as the basis for rating:
(1) A perfect value score (PVS) of 2 which appeared in the third column
indicated an ideal weight assigned to each defined criterion.
(2) A merit score (MS) consisting of numbers 0 to 2 appeared in the fourth
column on the form. A comparative weight was assigned to the relative
realization in the textbook under scrutiny of each actual criterion: each
functional skill which presented both material and review/test received 2,
each functional skill which only presented the material or review/test credited
1 point, and a total lack got a score of 0.
The result of checklist is presented as follows:
48
Table 4.2
The Checklist of the Comparison of the Speech Functional Expressions
Found in the KTSP and those in the E-Book
SPEECH
FUNCTIONAL
EXPRESSIONS
IN THE KTSP
SPEECH FUNCTIONAL
EXPRESSIONS
IN THE E-BOOK
PERFECT
VALUE
SCORE
(PVS)
MERIT
SCORE
(MS)
A. Functional Skills
1. Making Suggestions Present both material and
review/test 2 2
2. Requesting Present both material and
review/test 2 2
3. Complaining Do not present both material
and review/test 2 0
4. Giving Instructions Present both material and
review/test 2 2
5. Admitting Doing
Something Wrong
Present both material and
review/test 2 2
6. Making a Promise/
Swearing
Present both material and
review/test 2 2
7. Blaming and
Accusing
Present both material and
review/test 2 2
8. Expressing
Curiousity
Present both material and
review/test 2 2
9. Showing Attitudes Only present the review/test
section 2 1
Discussing
Possibilities
Present both functional skill
and review/test section 2 2
10. Persuading Present both functional skill
and review/test section 2 2
49
11. Encouraging Present both functional skill
and review/test section 2 2
12. Hoping Only present the review/test
section 2 1
13. Criticising and
Deterring
Present both functional skill
and review/test section 2 2
14. Expressing Regret Present both functional skill
and review/test section 2 2
15. Predicting and
Speculating
Present both functional skill
and review/test section 2 2
16. Judging Present both functional skill
and review/test section 2 2
17. Giving or Asking
Plans, Intentions,
and Purposes
Present both functional skill
and review/test section 2 2
B. Genres
a. Short Functional
Texts
- - -
b. Monologue Texts
18. Narrative 1 Only present the review/test
section 2 1
19. Explanation Only present the review/test
section 2 1
20. Discussion Only present the review/test
section 2 1
21. Narrative 2 Only present the review/test
section 2 1
22. Review Only present the review/test
section 2 1
Total 46 37
50
As what were drawn in the table above, there were fourteen speech
functional expressions in the e-book Developing English Competencies 3 which
got the merit score of 2 as both the materials or the explanations and the
review/test section were given in the e-book. They were the expressions of
making suggestions, requesting, giving instructions, admitting doing something
wrong, making a promise/swearing, blaming ang accusing, expressing curiousity,
persuading, encouraging, criticising and deterring, expressing regret, predicting
and speculating, judging, and giving or asking plans, intentions, and purposes.
One speech functional expressions found in the e-book that was not mentioned in
the School-Based Curriculum also got the merit score of 2. It was the expressions
of discussing possibilitites.
The other speech functional expressions found in the e-book Developing
English Competencies 3 got the merit score of 1 and 0. The speech functional
expressions that got the merit score of 1 were those which only gave the
review/test section. They were the expression of showing attitudes and the
expression of hoping, narrative text 1, explanation, discussion, narrative text 2,
and review. While the expression of complaining was the only speech functional
expression which got the merit score of 0 since there were no explanation and
review/test section ofthis expression given in the e-book.
From table 4.2, it was concluded that the total number of the merit score of
the speech functional expressions found in the e-book Developing English
Competencies 3 was 37, while the total number of the pervect value score was 46.
By having this number of merit score, the speech functional expressions were
51
said to be compatible because the total minimum number of the merit score that
had to be reached by the speech functional expressions to be said compatible was
only 33. It was from the calculation of the minimum percentage of the
consistency, 71% multipled by 46, as the total number of the pervect value score.
4.4 Using Percentage Formula to Find out the Degree of
Consistency of the Speech Functional Expressions Found in
the E-Book and those in the School-Based Curriculum
The percentage of
consistency
Total merit scores
= X 100%
Total perfect value
scores
37
= X 100%
46
= 80,43%
From the computation above, it was concluded that degree of the
consistency of the speaking skill in the e-book is closely consistent with the
curriculum, since the percentage of the speaking skill was more than 71%. The
graphic representation is as follows:
52
Evaluation result: 80,43% (very closely consistent)
Figure 4.1 Graphic Representation
of the Speech Functional Expressions
Graphic representation of the speech functional expressions above
represented the data drawn in table 4.2. The vertical line represented the range of
scoring, both the pervect value score and the merit score. The horizontal line
represented the speech functional expressions, from the speech functional
expression number 1 until number 23. The speech functional expressions drawn
in the graphic were as follows:
1) Number 1 was the expression of making suggestions,
2) Number 2 was the expression of requesting,
3) Number 3 was the expression of complaining,
4) Number 4 was the expression of giving instructions,
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23
Sco
rin
g
Functional Skills
Perfect Value Score (PVS) Merit Score (MS)
53
5) Number 5 was the expression of admitting doing something wrong,
6) Number 6 was the expression of making a promise/swearing,
7) Number 7 was the expression of blaming and accusing,
8) Number 8 was the expression of expressing curiousity,
9) Number 9 was the expression of showing attitudes,
10) Number 10 was the expression of discussing possibilities,
11) Number 11 was the expression of persuading,
12) Number 12 was the expression of encouraging,
13) Number 13 was the expression of hoping,
14) Number 14 was the expression of criticising and deterring,
15) Number 15 was the expression of expressing regret,
16) Number 16 was the expression of predicting and speculating,
17) Number 17 was the expression of judging,
18) Number 18 was the expression of giving or asking plans, intentions, and
purposes,
19) Number 19 was the narrative text 1 (monologue),
20) Number 20 was the explanation text (monologue),
21) Number 21 was the discussion text (monologue),
22) Number 22 was the narrative text 2 (monologue), and
23) Number 23 was the review text (monologue).
Furthermore, the straight solid line represented the pervect value score of
2. The dotted line, in the other hand, was the representation of the merit score,
consisting number 0-2.
54
4.5 Evaluating the Compatibility of the Speech Functional
Expressions of the E-Book and the School-Based Curriculum
No textbook is perfect. Therefore, teachers should have the option of assigning
supplementary materials based on their own specific needs in their own specific
teaching situation.
According to the School-Based Curriculum, an English textbook for
twelfth year students should present 22 materials of speaking skills, they are:
(1) 17 functional skills, they are the expressions of making suggestions,
requesting, complaining, giving instructions, admitting doing something
wrong, making a promise/ swearing, blaming and accusing, expressing
curiousity, showing attitudes, persuading, encouraging, hoping, criticising
and deterring, expressing regret, predicting and speculating, judging, giving
or asking plans, intentions, and purposes;
(2) 5 monologue texts, they are: narrative 1 (given in semester 1), explanation,
discussion, narrative 2 (given in semester 2), and review.
After mapping and comparing the speech functional expressions in the e-
book with the school-based curriculum, and scoring the checklist and finding out
the degree of consistency of the speech functional expressions, I concluded that
the speech functional expressions found in the e-book Developing English
Competencies 3 are compatible with the school-based curriculum. In the speaking
materials, it was found that there were 7 functional expressions of the speaking
skill: 2 functional skills (showing attitudes and hoping) and 5 monologue texts
55
(narrative text 1, explanation, discussion, narrative text 2, and review) were not
presented completely in the e-book. There were only the review/test section of
those materials. Moreover, there was 1 functional skill that was not mentioned in
the school-based curriculum but it was presented in the textbook. It was the
expression of discussing possibilities. In other words, the e-book can be said to be
a valid, useful and labor saving tool.
The following chapter presents conclusions and suggestions as the result
of the study.
56
CHAPTER V
CONCLUSIONS AND SUGGESTIONS
After completing the analysis of all the subject matters in the previous chapter, I
would like to draw the conclusions and offer some suggestions.
5.1 Conclusions
Based on the results of the speech functional expressions analysis in the Chapter
IV, I concluded that the speech functional expressions in the e-book are
compatible with the School-Based Curriculum since I found 23 speech functional
expressions: 22 speech functional expressions were based on the curriculum (1 of
those 22 does not present both the materials and the review section, that is the
expression of complaining, and 7 of those 22 only present the review section,
those are the expresssion of showing attitudes, the expression of hoping, narrative
text 1, explanation, discussion, narrative text 2, and review), and 1 speech
functional expression presented in the e-book was not mentioned in the School-
Based Curriculum, that is the expression of discussing possibilities. The speech
functional expressions of the speaking materials were applied in interpersonal
conversation, transactional conversation, and monologues.
In addition to the explanation above, the presentage of the speaking skill in
the e-book is closely consistent with the School-Based Curriculum, since it is
more than 71%, that is 80,43%. The presentage above means that the analyzed
56
57
speech functional expressions in the speaking materials of the e-book Developing
English Competencies 3 published by Pusat Perbukuan Depdiknas are closely
compatible with the School-Based Curriculum.
5.2 Suggestions
After finishing the analysis, I would like to offer some suggestions as follows:
(1) Since a good text should have compatible speaking materials, the author of
the book should use the variation of speech functional expressions needed to
make the learners or the students easier in doing their daily communication.
(2) For the readers, hopefully they will be more concern to the speech functional
expressions used in the speaking materials in every e-book/ textbook.
Therefore, they will be able to understand and deliver meaning well because
their sentences and utterances are properly used in daily communication.
(3) For English teachers, they can use this analysis as their consideration in
selecting a good e-book/textbook for teaching and learning process.
58
REFERENCE
Anggraeni, Wulan. 2009. An Analysis of The Content Consistency of the English
Textbook Entitled “Look Ahead: An English Course For Senior High
School Students Year X” Published by Erlangga with the KTSP (School
Based Curriculum). Unpublished Final Project of Sarjana Pendidikan of
English Department. Semarang: UNNES.
Ansary, H. 2002. Universal Characteristics of EFL/ESL Textbooks : A Step
Towards Systemic Textbook Evaluation. The Internet TESL Journal. Vol.
VIII, No. 2. Available at: http://iteslj.org/Articles/Ansary-Textbooks/
[accessed 20/5/11]
Brown, H. Douglas. 2004. Language Assessment Principles and Classroom
Practices. New York: Longman.
Brown, W. James Richard B Lewis and Fred F. Harcleroad. 1983. An Instruction:
Technology, Media, and Methods. New York: Mc Graw Hill Company.
Carr, Jo Ann. 2001. A Guide to the Management of Curriculum Materials Centers
for the 21st Century. USA: Association of College and Research Library.
Available at: http://books.google.co.id/ [accessed 8/5/11]
Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. 2004. Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan.
Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.
Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. 2006. Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan.
Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.
Dhir, Amit. 2004. The Digital Consumer Technology Handbook: A
Comprehensive Guide to Devices, Standards, Future Directions, and
Programmable Direct Solutions. Oxford: Elsevier. Available at:
http://books.google.co.id/ [accessed 8/4/11]
Doddy, Achmad, Ahmad Sugeng, and Effendi. 2008. Developing English
Competencies 3 for Senior High School (SMA/MA) Grade XII of Natural
and Social Science Programmes. Jakarta: Pusat Perbukuan Depdiknas.
Available at: www.bse-depdiknas.co.id [accessed 29/1/11]
Gabrielatos, C. 2000. The Coursebook as a Flexible Tool. Available at:
http://www.gabrielatos.com/CB-use.htm. [accessed 27/2/11]
Herningtyasari, Gadis. 2010. The Compatibility of Writing Exercises in English
on Sky 2 for the Year Eight of Junior High School Published by Erlangga
and School-Based Curriculum. Unpublished Final Project of Sarjana
Pendidikan of English Department. Semarang: UNNES.
58
59
Hornby, A.S. 1995. Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary of Current English.
Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Intani , Eka Nur. 2009. The Compatibility of Speech Functional Expressions
Found in English Textbook Entitled The Bridge English Competence for
Junior High School Grade VII Published by Yudhistira with the School
Based Curriculum. Unpublished Final Project of Sarjana Pendidikan of
English Department. Semarang: UNNES.
Kitao. 1997. Selecting and Developing Teaching Material. Vol. IV, No.4.
Available at: http://iteslj.org/Articles/Kitao-Materials.html. [accessed
27/2/11]
Lado, Robert. 1964. Language Testing. USA: Mc Graw Hill Book Company.
Linggar, Dwi, A., Dr. 2007. KTSP for Senior High School. (Unpublished Modul).
McTighe, Jay and Grant P. Wiggins. 2005. Understanding by Design. Alexandria:
ASCD. Available at: http://books.google.co.id/ [accessed 8/5/11]
Mujiyanto, Yan. 2007. Petunjuk Penulisan Skripsi. Semarang: UNNES Press.
Nawawi, H. Hadari, Prof. Dr. 1993. Metode Penelitian Bidang Sosial.
Yogyakarta: Gajah Mada University Press.
Nunan, David. 2003. Practical English Language Teaching. New York: The
Mcgraw-Hill companies.
Pratt, David. 1980. Curriculum: Design and Development. San Diego: Harcourt
Bace Javanovich, inc.
Retmono. 1994. Kajian Beberapa Buku Teks Bahasa Ingris yang digunakan di
SLTP berdasarkan Kurikulum 1994. (Unpublished Paper).
Saleh, Mursid. 2001. Pengantar Praktik Penelitian Pengajaran Bahasa.
Semarang: UNNES Press.
Seely. 1995. Speaking and Listening: Instructional Philosophy and Teaching
Suggestions. Available at:
http://www.sasklearning.gov.sk.ca/docs/mla/speak.html. [accessed 8/5/11]
Skager, R., R. H. Dave and K. G. Robinson. 1977. Curriculum Evaluation for
Lifelong Education. First Edition. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Thanasoulas, D. 1999. Coursebook: Take it or Leave it. Available at:
http://www.englishclub.com/tefl-article/coursebook/htm. [accessed 27/2/11]
60
Ur, Penny. 1996. A Course in Language Teaching: Practice & Theory.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Walter, Elizabeth. 2008. Cambridge Advanced Learner’s Dictionary. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
61
APPENDICES Appendix 1
ELT Textbook Evaluating Schemes
Penny UR (1996)
Criterion
Importance
Objectives explicitly laid
out in an introduction,
and implemented in the
material
Approach educationally
and socially acceptable to
target community
Clear attractive layout;
print easy to read
Appropriate visual
materials available
Interesting topics and
tasks
Varied topics and tasks,
So as to provide for
different learners levels,
learning styles, interests,
etc. Clear instructions
Systematic coverage of
syllabus
Content clearly organized
and graded (sequenced by
difficulty)
Periodic review and test
sections
61
62
Plenty of authentic
language
Good pronunciation
explanation and practice
Good vocabulary
explanation and practice
Good grammar
explanation and practice
Fluency practice in all
four skills
Encourage learners to
develop own learning
strategies and to become
independent in their
learning
Adequate guidance for
the teacher, not too heavy
preparation load
Audio cassettes
63
Appendix 2
Evaluation Form
H. Ansary
Title: Combination Level 3
Authors: Ghosni, et al.
Publisher: Simin Educational Association
Date of Publication: 1992
Components: Teacher‟s guide with an answer key, audio cassette
Length: 4 units, each 4 lessons plus 2 consolidation units
Physical Size: 22 x 29 cm
No. of Pages: 147
Price: Rs. 9.100
Hours: 4 x 4= 16, 16 x 1.5=24, 24+(2 x 1.5)=27
Target Learners: Adult, ES, Level 3 target teachers: BA holders in TEFL
Evaluator: H. Ansary
Universal Characteristics
Defining Criteria
PVS
MS
Approach
Dissemination of a theory
about
Terrell & Krashen‟s (1977)
Natural approach to SLA
2 2
The nature of language A means for
communicating meanings
2 2
The nature of learning Comprehension precedes
production,
2 2
How the theory can be put to
applied use
Comprehensible input,
anxiety-free, acquisition
rich environment
2 2
Content presentation
Stating purpose(s) and
objective(s)
Basic skills in
communication
2 2
For the total course Survival English 2 1
For individual units Cf. Teacher‟s guide 2 2
Selection and its rationale Comprehensible familiar
topics
2 1
Coverage Core grammar &
vocabulary
2 2
Grading I+1 to … 2 1
Organization ES program, textbooks 1, 2 1
64
2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8, each
4 units, each unit four
lessons
Satisfaction of the syllabus 90% satisfaction 2 2
To the teacher providing a
guide book
Necessary 2 2
Giving advice on the
methodology
Detailed teaching
techniques
2 2
Giving theoretical Detailed technical 2 2
65
Appendix 3
Mapping of the Speaking Material in the School-Based Curriculum
Smt Standard
Competence
Basic
Competence
Speech Functional Expressions
for Speaking
Materials
1 3. Mengung-
kapkan
makna
dalam teks
percakapan
transaksio-
nal dan
interpersonal
resmi dan
berlanjut
dalam
konteks
kehidupan
sehari-hari
3.1 Mengungkapkan makna
dalam percakapan
transaksional (to get things
done) dan interpersonal
(bersosialisasi) resmi dan
berlanjut (sustained) secara
akurat, lancar dan berterima
dalam konteks kehidupan
sehari-hari dan melibatkan
tindak tutur: mengusulkan,
memohon, mengeluh,
membahas kemungkinan
atau untuk melakukan
sesuatu, dan memerintah.
3.2 Mengungkapkan makna
dalam percakapan
transaksional (to get things
done) dan interpersonal
(bersosialisasi) resmi dan
berlanjut (sustained) secara
akurat, lancar dan berterima
dalam konteks kehidupan
sehari-hari dan melibatkan
tindak tutur: mengakui
kesalahan, berjanji,
menyalahkan, menuduh,
mengungkapkan
keingintahuan dan hasrat,
dan menyatakan berbagai
sikap
1. Functional Skills
Making suggestions (1),
Requesting (2),
Complaining (3), and
Giving Instructions (4).
2. Genres
(1) Short Functional Texts
-
(2) Monologue Texts
-
2. Functional Skills
Using expressions for
admitting doing
something wrong (5).
Making a
promise/swearing (6),
Blaming and accusing (7).
Expressing curiousity (8),
and
Showing attitudes (9).
2. Genres
(1) Short Functional Texts
-
(2) Monologue Texts
-
66
1 4. Mengung-
kapkan
makna
dalam teks
fungsional
pendek dan
monolog
berbentuk
narrative,
explanation
dan
discussion
dalam
konteks
kehidupan
sehari-hari
4.1 Mengungkapkan makna
dalam teks fungsional
pendek resmi dan tak resmi
dengan menggunakan
ragam bahasa lisan secara
akurat, lancar dan berterima
dalam konteks kehidupan
sehari-hari
4.2 Mengungkapkan makna
dalam teks monolog dengan
menggunakan ragam bahasa
lisan secara akurat, lancar
dan berterima dalam
konteks kehidupan sehari-
hari dalam teks berbentuk:
narrative, explanation, dan
discussion
1. Functional Skills
-
2. Genres
(1) Short Functional Texts
-
(2) Monologue Texts
-
1. Functional Skills
-
2. Genres
(1) Short Functional Texts
-
(2) Monologue Texts
Narrative (10)
Explanation (11)
Discussion (12)
2 9. Mengung-
kapkan
makna
dalam teks
interaksio-
nal, dengan
penekanan
pada
percakapan
transaksio-
nal resmi
dan
berlanjut
dalam
konteks
kehidupan
sehari-hari.
9.1 Mengungkapkan makna
dalam percakapan
transaksional (to get things
done) dan interpersonal
(bersosialisasi) resmi dan
berlanjut (sustained) secara
akurat, lancar dan berterima
dengan menggunakan
ragam bahasa lisan dalam
konteks kehidupan sehari-
hari dan melibatkan tindak
tutur: membujuk,
mendorong semangat,
mengkritik,
mengungkapkan harapan,
dan mencegah.
9.2 Merespon makna dalam
percakapan transaksional
(to get things done) dan
interpersonal
(bersosialisasi) resmi dan
berlanjut (sustained) secara
akurat, lancar dan berterima
dengan menggunakan
ragam bahasa lisan dalam
konteks kehidupan sehari-
1. Functional Skills
Persuading (13),
Encouraging (14),
Hoping (15), and
Criticising and Deterring
(16)
2. Genres
(1) Short Functional Texts
-
(2) Monologue
-
1. Functional Skills
Using expression of regret
(17).
Giving or Asking Plans,
Intentions, and Purposes
(18),
Predicting and
Speculating (19), and
Judging (20).
67
hari dan melibatkan tindak
tutur: menyesali,
mengungkapkan/
menanyakan rencana,
tujuan, maksud,
memprediksi, berspekulasi,
dan memberikan penilaian.
2. Genres
(1) Short Functional Texts
-
(2) Monologue
-
2 10. Mengung-
kapkan
makna
dalam teks
fungsional
pendek dan
monolog
yang
berbentuk
narrative
dan review
secara
akurat,
lancar dan
berterima
dalam
konteks
kehidupan
sehari-hari
10.1 Merespon makna dalam
teks fungsional pendek
resmi dan tak resmi yang
menggunakan ragam bahasa
tulis secara akurat, lancar
dan berterima dalam
konteks kehidupan sehari-
hari.
10.2 Mengungkapkan makna
dalam teks monolog dengan
menggunakan ragam bahasa
tulis secara akurat, lancar
dan berterima dalam
konteks kehidupan sehari-
hari dalam teks berbentuk:
narrative dan review.
1. Functional Skills
-
2. Genres
(1) Short Functional Texts
-
(2) Monologue Texts
-
1. Functional Skills
-
2. Genres
(1) Short Functional Texts
-
(2) Monologue
Narrative (21)
Review (22)
From the mapping above, it could be seen clearly that there were 22 speech
functional expressions stated in the standard and basic competence of the School-
Based Curriculum. They were applied in transactional conversation, interpersonal
conversation, and monologues.
68
Appendix 4
Mapping of the Speaking Materials in E-Book
Developing English Competencies 3
Smt Chapter Theme Speech Functional Expressions for
Speaking Materials
1
1 Can You Tell
Me the Story?
Making suggestions (1), requests (2), and
instructions (3).
Performing a monologue of narrative text (4).
2 How the
Water Cycle
Works
Blaming, accusing (5), and complaining (6).
Using expressions for admitting doing
something wrong (7).
Making a promise and swearing (8).
Performing monologues of explanation texts
(9).
3 Let‟s Discuss
Some Issues
Saying you are curious (10).
Expressing possibilities (11) and showing
attitudes (12).
Performing a monologue of discussion texts
(13).
2
4 It‟s a Great
Story Persuading (14), encouraging (15), and hoping
(16).
Using expression for criticising and deterring
(17).
Performing monologues of narrative texts (18).
5 The Book is
Amazing Using expression of regret (19).
Giving or asking plans, purpose, and intention
(20).
Predicting, speculating (21), and judging (22).
Performing a monologue of review text (23).
From the mapping above, it could be seen clearly that there were 23 speech
functional expressions which were found in the e-book. They were applied in
transactional conversation, conversation, and monologues.
69
Appendix 5
TEXTBOOK ANALYSIS INSTRUMENT
Title : Developing English Competencies 3
Author : Achmad Doddy, Ahmad Sugeng, and Effendi
Publisher : Pusat Perbukuan Depdiknas
Date of publication : 2008
No. of pages : 176
(first column) (second column) (third column) (fourth column)
FUNCTIONAL
EXPRESSIONS IN
THE KTSP
FUNCTIONAL
EXPRESSIONS IN THE
E-BOOK
PERFECT
VALUE
SCORE
(PVS)
MERIT
SCORE
(MS)
A. Functional Skills
1. Making suggestions
2. Requesting
3. Complaining
4. Giving Instructions
5. Admitting Doing
Something Wrong
6. Making a
Promise/Swearing
7. Blaming and
Accusing
8. Expressing
Curiousity
9. Showing Attitudes
Discussing
Possibilities
10. Persuading
70
11. Encouraging
12. Hoping
13. Criticising and
Deterring
14. Expressing Regret
15. Predicting and
Speculating
16. Judging
17. Giving or Asking
Plans, Intentions,
and Purposes
B. Genres
a. Short Functional
Texts
b. Monologue Texts
18. Narrative 1
19. Explanation
20. Discussion
21. Narrative 2
22. Review
Total
71
Appendix 6
Standard Content of English for Senior High School Grade XII of Natural
and Social Science Programmes
Semester 1
Standar Kompetensi Kompetensi Dasar
Mendengarkan
1. Memahami makna
dalam teks percakapan
transaksional dan
interpersonal resmi dan
berlanjut dalam konteks
kehidupan sehari-hari
Merespon makna dalam percakapan
transaksional (to get things done) dan
interpersonal (bersosialisasi) resmi dan
berlanjut (sustained) secara akurat, lancar dan
berterima dalam konteks kehidupan sehari-hari
dan melibatkan tindak tutur: mengusulkan,
memohon, mengeluh, membahas kemungkinan
atau untuk melakukan sesuatu, dan
memerintah
Merespon makna dalam percakapan
transaksional (to get things done) dan
interpersonal (bersosialisasi) resmi dan
berlanjut (sustained) secara akurat, lancar dan
berterima dalam konteks kehidupan sehari-hari
dan melibatkan tindak tutur: mengakui
kesalahan, berjanji, menyalahkan, menuduh,
mengungkapkan keingintahuan dan hasrat, dan
menyatakan berbagai sikap
2. Memahami makna
dalam teks fungsional
pendek dan monolog
berbentuk narrative,
explanation dan
Merespon makna dalam teks fungsional
pendek resmi dan tak resmi yang
menggunakan ragam bahasa lisan secara
akurat, lancar dan berterima dalam konteks
kehidupan sehari-hari
72
Standar Kompetensi Kompetensi Dasar
discussion dalam
konteks kehidupan
sehari-hari
Merespon makna dalam teks monolog
yang menggunakan ragam bahasa lisan secara
akurat, lancar dan berterima dalam konteks
kehidupan sehari-hari dalam teks berbentuk:
narrative, explanation, dan discussion
Berbicara
3. Mengungkapkan makna
dalam teks percakapan
transaksional dan
interpersonal resmi dan
berlanjut dalam konteks
kehidupan sehari-hari
Mengungkapkan makna dalam percakapan
transaksional (to get things done) dan
interpersonal (bersosialisasi) resmi dan
berlanjut (sustained) secara akurat, lancar dan
berterima dalam konteks kehidupan sehari-hari
dan melibatkan tindak tutur: mengusulkan,
memohon, mengeluh, membahas kemungkinan
atau untuk melakukan sesuatu, dan
memerintah
Mengungkapkan makna dalam percakapan
transaksional (to get things done) dan
interpersonal (bersosialisasi) resmi dan
berlanjut (sustained) secara akurat, lancar dan
berterima dalam konteks kehidupan sehari-hari
dan melibatkan tindak tutur: mengakui
kesalahan, berjanji, menyalahkan, menuduh,
mengungkapkan keingintahuan dan hasrat ,
dan menyatakan berbagai sikap
4. Mengungkapkan makna
dalam teks fungsional
pendek dan monolog
Mengungkapkan makna dalam teks
fungsional pendek resmi dan tak resmi dengan
menggunakan ragam bahasa lisan secara
73
Standar Kompetensi Kompetensi Dasar
berbentuk narrative,
explanation dan
discussion dalam
konteks kehidupan
sehari-hari
akurat, lancar dan berterima dalam konteks
kehidupan sehari-hari
Mengungkapkan makna dalam teks
monolog dengan menggunakan ragam bahasa
lisan secara akurat, lancar dan berterima dalam
konteks kehidupan sehari-hari dalam teks
berbentuk: narrative, explanation, dan
discussion
Membaca
5. Memahami makna teks
fungsional pendek dan
teks tulis esei berbentuk
narrative, explanation
dan discussion dalam
konteks kehidupan
sehari-hari dan untuk
mengakses ilmu
pengetahuan
Merespon makna dalam teks fungsional
pendek resmi dan tak resmi yang
menggunakan ragam bahasa tulis secara
akurat, lancar dan berterima dalam konteks
kehidupan sehari-hari dan untuk mengakses
ilmu pengetahuan.
Merespon makna dan langkah retorika
dalam esei yang menggunakan ragam bahasa
tulis secara akurat, lancar dan berterima dalam
konteks kehidupan sehari-hari dan untuk
mengakses ilmu pengetahuan dalam teks
berbentuk: narrative, explanation, dan
discussion
Menulis
6. Mengungkapkan makna
dalam teks tulis
monolog yang
berbentuk narrative,
explanation dan
Mengungkapkan makna dalam teks
fungsional pendek resmi dan tak resmi dengan
menggunakan ragam bahasa tulis secara
akurat, lancar dan berterima dalam konteks
kehidupan sehari-hari
74
Standar Kompetensi Kompetensi Dasar
discussion secara
akurat, lancar dan
berterima dalam
konteks kehidupan
sehari-hari
Mengungkapkan makna dan langkah
retorika dalam teks monolog dengan
menggunakan ragam bahasa tulis secara
akurat, lancar dan berterima dalam konteks
kehidupan sehari-hari dalam teks berbentuk:
narrative, explanation, dan discussion
Semester 2
Standar Kompetensi Kompetensi Dasar
Mendengarkan
7. Memahami makna
dalam teks percakapan
transaksional dan
interpersonal resmi dan
berlanjut (sustained)
dalam konteks
kehidupan sehari-hari
Merespon makna dalam percakapan
transaksional (to get things done) dan
interpersonal (bersosialisasi) resmi dan
berlanjut (sustained) secara akurat, lancar dan
berterima yang menggunakan ragam bahasa
lisan dan melibatkan tindak tutur: membujuk,
mendorong semangat, mengkritik,
mengungkapkan harapan, dan mencegah
Merespon makna dalam percakapan
transaksional (to get things done) dan
interpersonal (bersosialisasi) resmi dan
berlanjut (sustained) secara akurat, lancar dan
berterima yang menggunakan ragam bahasa
lisan dan melibatkan tindak tutur: menyesali,
mengungkapkan/menanyakan rencana, tujuan,
maksud, memprediksi, berspekulasi, dan
75
Standar Kompetensi Kompetensi Dasar
memberikan penilaian
8. Memahami makna
dalam teks fungsional
pendek dan monolog
yang berbentuk
narrative dan review
dalam konteks
kehidupan sehari-hari
Merespon makna dalam teks fungsional
pendek resmi dan tak resmi yang
menggunakan ragam bahasa lisan secara
akurat, lancar dan berterima dalam konteks
kehidupan sehari-hari
Memahami dan merespon makna dalam
teks monolog yang menggunakan ragam
bahasa lisan secara akurat, lancar dan berterima
dalam konteks kehidupan sehari-hari dalam
teks berbentuk: narrative dan review
Berbicara
9. Mengungkapkan
makna dalam teks
interaksional, dengan
penekanan pada
percakapan
transaksional resmi dan
berlanjut dalam
konteks kehidupan
sehari-hari
Mengungkapkan makna dalam percakapan
transaksional (to get things done) dan
interpersonal (bersosialisasi) resmi dan
berlanjut (sustained) secara akurat, lancar dan
berterima dengan menggunakan ragam bahasa
lisan dalam konteks kehidupan sehari-hari dan
melibatkan tindak tutur:membujuk,
mendorong semangat, mengkritik ,
mengungkapkan harapan, dan mencegah
Merespon makna dalam percakapan
transaksional (to get things done) dan
interpersonal (bersosialisasi) resmi dan
berlanjut (sustained) secara akurat, lancar dan
berterima dengan menggunakan ragam bahasa
lisan dalam konteks kehidupan sehari-hari dan
76
Standar Kompetensi Kompetensi Dasar
melibatkan tindak tutur: menyesali,
mengungkapkan/menanyakan rencana, tujuan,
maksud, memprediksi, berspekulasi, dan
memberikan penilaian
10. Mengungkapkan
makna dalam teks
fungsional pendek dan
monolog yang
berbentuk narrative
dan review secara
akurat, lancar dan
berterima dalam
konteks kehidupan
sehari-hari
Merespon makna dalam teks fungsional
pendek resmi dan tak resmi yang
menggunakan ragam bahasa tulis secara
akurat, lancar dan berterima dalam konteks
kehidupan sehari-hari
Mengungkapkan makna dalam teks
monolog dengan menggunakan ragam bahasa
tulis secara akurat, lancar dan berterima dalam
konteks kehidupan sehari-hari dalam teks
berbentuk: narrative dan review
Membaca
11. Memahami makna teks
tulis monolog yang
berbentuk narrative
dan review secara
akurat, lancar dan
berterima dalam
konteks kehidupan
sehari-hari dan untuk
mengakses ilmu
pengetahuan
Merespon makna dalam teks fungsional
pendek resmi dan tak resmi yang
menggunakan ragam bahasa tulis secara
akurat, lancar dan berterima dalam konteks
kehidupan sehari-hari dan untuk mengakses
ilmu pengetahuan
Merespon makna dan langkah retorika
dalam teks monolog yang menggunakan ragam
bahasa tulis secara akurat, lancar dan berterima
dalam konteks kehidupan sehari-hari dan
untuk mengakses ilmu pengetahuan dalam teks
berbentuk: narrative dan review
Menulis
77
Standar Kompetensi Kompetensi Dasar
12. Mengungkapkan
makna dalam teks tulis
monolog/esei
berbentuk narrative
dan review dalam
konteks kehidupan
sehari-hari
Mengungkapkan makna dan langkah
retorika dalam esei dengan menggunakan
ragam tulis secara akurat, lancar dan berterima
dalam konteks kehidupan sehari-hari dalam
teks berbentuk: narrative dan review
78
Appendix 7
The Speaking Materials in E-Book Developing English Competencies 3
79
80
Z
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110