the central role of agriculture in myanmar’s economic

31
The Central Role of Agriculture in Myanmar’s Economic Development Duncan Boughton, Professor, International Development, MSU Ben Belton, Assistant Professor, International Development, MSU Steven Radelet, Georgetown University Yezin Agricultural University, December 12, 2016

Upload: others

Post on 26-Jan-2022

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

The Central Role of Agriculture in Myanmar’s Economic DevelopmentDuncan Boughton, Professor, International Development, MSU

Ben Belton, Assistant Professor, International Development, MSUSteven Radelet, Georgetown University

Yezin Agricultural University, December 12, 2016

Outline

• Introducing each other• Why is economic growth important?• Why is agriculture important for growth?• What is “agricultural transformation”?• An example from Myanmar• YAU graduates as “change agents”• Why wearing a motorbike helmet is essential to

your contribution to Myanmar’s development

Getting to know each other…..• Do your parents farm?• Do you think of yourself as a future leader in the

workplace or community?• Do you know what job or occupation you want to

pursue when you graduate from YAU?• How many of you want to be farmers?• Do you have a plan to achieve that job or occupation?• Do you where a helmet when you are on a motorcycle

off campus (on a public road or highway)?• Do you where a helmet when you are on a motorcycle

on campus?

Why is Economic Growth Important?• Development is all about creating opportunities, and building

people’s capacities to take advantage of those opportunities. Economic growth helps countries make progress in both of these areas.

• Economic growth is both an increase in production, and an increase in incomes. Economic growth means more jobs and higher income for individuals, families, and society.

• Economic growth is perhaps the single most powerful engine for broad-based development progress: growth leads to gains in health, education, poverty reduction and other dimensions of development.

• These relationships go both ways.• The increases in income allow families and societies to eat more

and better food, put more of their children in school, keep their families healthy, build better schools and clinics, invest in roads and communications facilities, and build more prosperous lives.

4

Why is Sustainable Growth so Important?• Growth must be sustained over years, decades, and

generations in order to translate into broad-based development.

• Even modest growth – if sustained – can be a powerful engine for change. For example, with growth of 3% per capita, average income doubles every 23 years (basically every generation).

• Short spurts of growth (say, from exploiting natural resources for a few years) do not lead to long-term development.

• For growth to be sustained:• Governments must create stability and legitimacy, and invest in

infrastructure and in people.• Individuals and businesses must believe that their own

investments will pay off.• Natural resources must be managed to last a long time.

5

Why is Inclusive Growth so important?• What is inclusive growth? Inclusive growth is economic growth

that includes the majority of a country’s population. Inclusive growth creates new income opportunities for as many people as possible, especially the poor, minority groups, women, and isolated rural populations.

• Typically accompanied by broad-based (inclusive) investments in education, health, and infrastructure, alongside improvements in inclusive governance (with wide participation of, and consultation with, all groups in society).

• Why is inclusive growth important?• Creates an atmosphere of justice and fairness. • Builds the political legitimacy of the government.• Supports peace and reconciliation.• Encourages investment and cooperation, which helps to sustain growth

over time.• Inclusive growth is especially important in conflict and post-

conflict environments. 6

Why is Agriculture Central to Economic Development?

• Almost all developing countries that have achieved sustained and inclusive growth began with a strong focus on agriculture.

• Growth in agriculture:• Creates higher incomes for the rural poor (therefore, it is

highly inclusive).• Reduces poverty rapidly.• Produces more food and related products for the entire

country.• Eventually, allows some workers to shift from agriculture to

processing and manufacturing.• As agricultural productivity grows, fewer workers can

produce more food, so some workers shift to processing, manufacturing, services, other activities.

• A developing economy cannot diversify into other activities without first increasing agricultural productivity.

7

Agriculture and Comparative Advantage

• Agriculture makes particular sense in countries with abundant fertile land and water (like Myanmar).

• These attributes give Myanmar a comparative advantage in agriculture: that is, it has a big advantage in producing agricultural goods compared to other goods (e.g., industrial goods).

• Export of agricultural products can be an important source of foreign exchange to pay for imported goods that Myanmar does not have a comparative advantage in (e.g., aeroplanes)

• Countries that have ignored this kind of comparative advantage (ignored agriculture) and tried to move too quickly to into industry have failed.

• Countries that have focused on their comparative advantage and used it fully have typically experienced more sustained and inclusive growth.

8

As growth proceeds, production shifts to manufacturing and services• Known as the “structural transformation.”• The share of agriculture in total production (GDP) falls, while

the share of manufacturing (including processing) and services rise.

• But in successful countries, during this process, agricultural production continues to grow.

• When the share of agriculture in GDP is falling, it does not mean that agriculture production is falling. It just means that manufacturing (and services) are growing faster.

• For example, in Thailand, since 1970:• Agriculture as a share of GDP has fallen from 25% to 10%.• At the same time, agricultural production has more than tripled.• (Note that processing of agricultural goods is part of

manufacturing).

9

Thailand: Agriculture and Manufacturing (shares of GDP)

10

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

1970

1972

1974

1976

1978

1980

1982

1984

1986

1988

1990

1992

1994

1996

1998

2000

2002

2004

2006

2008

2010

2012

2014

Shar

e of

GDP

(%)

Agriculture, value added Manufacturing, value added

Note: Manufacturing includes agricultural processing and certain agricultural-related businesses

Thailand: Agricultural Production (total value added, constant prices)

11

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

1970

1972

1974

1976

1978

1980

1982

1984

1986

1988

1990

1992

1994

1996

1998

2000

2002

2004

2006

2008

2010

2012

2014

cons

tant

pric

es, 1

970

= 10

0

Agriculture, value added (1970=100)

What is agricultural transformation?

YESTERDAY TOMORROW ??

Transformation pathways….From subsistence farmer to entrepreneur (business person)• Access to reliable, high value markets

• Physical access (roads, secure storage, cold storage)• Quality requirements, SPS and traceability• Agro-processing to avoid perishable produce gluts

• Access to irrigation and land improvement• Access to information on market prices and production

techniques• Information on profitable enterprises and management practices

• Aquaculture, fruits and vegetables, livestock and dairy,

• Access to production inputs and services• Market and ecology suited varieties or breeds• Fertilizers, pesticides, feeds, veterinary services and mechanization

• Access to finance• Seasonal inputs, marketing credit and equipment

Agricultural transformation drives transformation of the rural economy?• Rural transformation refers to the process of growth

and diversification of the rural economy, resulting in higher incomes from both farm and off-farm employment

• A large share of increased smallholder farm incomes are typically spent in the local economy, spurring growth in the rural non-farm economy (RNFE)

• The stronger the synergies between growth in the farm and growth in the non-farm components over time the more sustainable the transformation

• Public policies and investments have the potential to foster or hinder this virtual growth cycle -> hence need to know what is actually happening on the ground

Myanmar Aquaculture Agriculture Survey (MAAS)

Methodology• Purposively selected 2 clusters of ‘aquaculture’ and

‘agriculture’ village tracts for comparison, based on spatial concentration of ponds and prevailing crop farming systems

• Randomly selected ‘enumerations areas’ and households to represent entire populations of both clusters (including non-farm households)

• Total sample = 1102 HHs in 40 village tracts, representing 37,390 HH

Survey locations

Rapidly accelerating rural-urban migration post-2010

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

1995 1997 1999 2001 2005 2008 2010 2012 2014

UrbanRural

The cumulative share of current migrants by year (%)

• 16% of HH have migrants• Average migrant age 20• 55:45 male/female split• 70% employed in

manufacturing• 8% international• Some rural-rural migration

from remoter areas for fulltime agricultural work (40% of permanent workers in aquaculture cluster)

• 80% of HH with migrants receive remittances

Real wage increases

+8%

+32%

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

2011 2013 2016

Real

dai

ly w

ages

(MM

K)

Average real daily wage for male agricultural labour(2011-2013)

Main impact of migration is on rural labour supply and wage rates

Labor shortages & rising wages driving mechanization

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

600019

9019

9119

9219

9319

9419

9519

9619

9719

9819

9920

0020

0120

0220

0320

0420

0520

0620

0720

0820

0920

1020

1120

1220

1320

1420

15

Cum

ulat

ive

num

ber o

f mac

hine

s pu

rcha

sed Surface-water Pump

2WTThresher4WTCombine

Cumulative purchases of agricultural machinery, 1990-2015

Adoption supported by rental services

0102030405060708090

100

2006 2011 2016

% o

f hou

seho

lds

usin

g m

achi

nery

Own Rented in Other

2006 2011 2016

Own Rented in Other

Machine Use for Land Preparation

Machine Use for Harvesting

• Access to credit improving due to MFIs and cooperatives

• Average rates of interest paid on informal and semi-formal loans fell from 72% in 2011 to 60% in 2016.

• Very few output-tied agricultural loans

Share of villages with credit access by source (2011-2016)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

% o

f vill

ages

with

acc

ess

2011 2016

Sources of credit diversifying

Rapid growth of non-farm enterprise

+229

%

+52%

+46%

+36%

-45%

-56%

0

5

10

15

20M

otor

tran

spor

t

Shop

s

Pers

onal

serv

ices

Food

serv

ices

Craf

ts

Agric

ultu

ral

trad

e

Mea

n bu

sines

ses/

villa

ge

2011 2016

• From 2011-2016, motor vehicles replaced boats as main mode of transport: average journey times to fell 20-30%.

• Increasing mobility: 44% of workers in fulltime employment travel beyond local area but remain resident

• Village stores have attained almost total ubiquity (96% of villages)

Change in average number of businesses per village, 2011-2016

Off-farm employment plays a major role in livelihoods for households in all income and landholdings groups

5 11 1523

3114

12

18

21

22

81 7767

5747

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5

Shar

e of

hou

seho

lds

Farm Only Farm & Off-farmOff-farm Only

Household participation in farm and off-farm employment

Agriculture directly provides >70% of primary employment (plus more in related value chains)

Non-farm employment, and off-farm agricultural work, contribute similar shares of primary employment

Agriculture still the major source of primary employment

Own farm, 42%

Agri-labor, 29%

Non-farm occupations,

29%

Share of primary employment, by type

18 2019

30

16

37

0

10

20

30

40

Monsoon Dry season

% of HH planting improved rice variety

2006 2011 2016

46

66

48

70

47

74

0

20

40

60

80

Monsoon Dry season

Paddy yield (baskets/acre)

2006 2011 2016

76 72 69

24 28 31

0%20%40%60%80%

100%

2006 2011 2016

Main paddy crop (% of HH reporting)

Monsoon Dry season

Incipient agricultural intensification

11

42

13

55

22

70

0

20

40

60

80

Monsoon Dry season

% of paddy farms applying herbicide

2006 2011 2016

Monsoon paddy: median gross margin 130,000 kyat / acre

-500000

-400000

-300000

-200000

-100000

0

100000

200000

300000

400000

5000001 7 13 19 25 31 37 43 49 55 61 67 73 79 85 91 97 103

109

115

121

127

133

139

145

151

157

163

169

175

181

187

193

199

205

211

217

223

229

235

241

Gro

ss m

argi

ns in

Mya

nmar

Kya

t

Household ID Gross margins (monsoon paddy)

Dry season paddy median gross margin 175,000 kyat/acre

-400000

-300000

-200000

-100000

0

100000

200000

300000

400000

500000

6000001 4 7 10 13 16 19 22 25 28 31 34 37 40 43 46 49 52 55 58 61 64 67 70 73 76 79 82 85 88 91 94 97 100

103

106

109

112

115

118

Gro

ss m

argi

ns in

Mya

nmar

Kya

t Household ID Gross margins (Dry season paddy)

Green gram median gross margin: 260,000 kyat per acre

-400000

-200000

0

200000

400000

600000

800000

1000000

1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 49 51 53 55 57 59 61 63 65 67 69 71 73 75 77 79

Gro

ss m

argi

ns in

Mya

nmar

Kya

t

Household ID Gross margins (Green gram)

Conclusions

• Rapid transformation of the RNFE taking place close to Yangon, driven by migration

• Migration driven by urban growth & industrialization post 2012

• Leading to: Labor shortages, rising wages → mechanization of agriculture, growth of RNFE

• Growth of RNFE, supported by: Greater mobility (transport services), deeper market integration (labour, inputs, outputs), improving access to and terms of credit

• Mechanization supported by: Expansion of formal finance, falling machine costs, thriving rental markets, scale neutrality

Conclusions• Agricultural productivity and farm profitability appears

to be growing more slowly than RNFE in the case study area

• Indicates need for more effective agricultural public investments and policies to assure sustainable rural economic growth dynamic, for example:

• Access to improved varieties and information on improved crop management practices

• Access to irrigation for expanded dry season crop production• Access to improved financial services for seasonal and

medium-term credit as well as for savings

• New government agricultural policy and development strategy aims to improve profitability of farming

• YAU graduates have a key role as “change agents” (if you wear a motorbike helmet AT ALL TIMES)

THANK YOU