the case for a liquid lithium-surface divertor · 2017. 6. 20. · components of fusion energy...

28
ss FESAC TEC Panel June 20, 2017 Chicago, IL Nuclear, Plasma, and Radiological Engineering Center for Plasma-Material Interactions Contact: [email protected] The Case for a Liquid Lithium-Surface Divertor David N. Ruzic , Jean Paul Allain, Davide Curreli and Daniel Andruczyk June 20, 2017

Upload: others

Post on 12-Sep-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: The Case for a Liquid Lithium-Surface Divertor · 2017. 6. 20. · components of fusion energy devices Most likely this would be at the divertor plate, but could also be considered

ssFESAC TEC Panel

June 20, 2017

Chicago, IL

Nuclear, Plasma, and Radiological Engineering

Center for Plasma-Material Interactions

Contact: [email protected]

The Case for a Liquid Lithium-Surface Divertor

David N. Ruzic, Jean Paul Allain,

Davide Curreli and Daniel Andruczyk

June 20, 2017

Page 2: The Case for a Liquid Lithium-Surface Divertor · 2017. 6. 20. · components of fusion energy devices Most likely this would be at the divertor plate, but could also be considered

ssFESAC TEC Panel

June 20, 2017

Chicago, IL

FESAC TEC Panel

June 20, 2017

Chicago, IL

1. Description of the Technology

Flowing molten lithium surfaces are to be used as the plasma-facing components of fusion energy devices

Most likely this would be at the divertor plate, but could also be considered for the first wall.

There are a number of technologies which could be used to do this. They include the

2

I. Lyublinski, et. al., JNM 463 (2015) 1156

J.S. Hu et al Nucl. Fusion

56 (2016) 046011

LiMIT and combinations/variations.CPS, FLiLi,

Page 3: The Case for a Liquid Lithium-Surface Divertor · 2017. 6. 20. · components of fusion energy devices Most likely this would be at the divertor plate, but could also be considered

ssFESAC TEC Panel

June 20, 2017

Chicago, IL

FESAC TEC Panel

June 20, 2017

Chicago, IL

Liquid Metal Infused Trenches (LiMIT) 3

Seebeck Effect creates thermoelectric current at junction between liquid lithium and solid trenches when a thermal gradient is present

A transverse magnetic field is applied, which generates a JxB force, propelling the liquid through the trenches

D. N. Ruzic, W. Xu, D. Andruczyk and M. A Jaworski,

“Lithium-Metal Infused Trenches (LiMIT) for Heat Removal

in Fusion Devices”, Nuc. Fusion, 52 (2011) 102002

Page 4: The Case for a Liquid Lithium-Surface Divertor · 2017. 6. 20. · components of fusion energy devices Most likely this would be at the divertor plate, but could also be considered

ssFESAC TEC Panel

June 20, 2017

Chicago, IL

Horizontal Flow

Utilizes TEMHD drive for propulsion of liquid lithium through series of trenches

Vertical Flow Sustained flow demonstrated at arbitrary angle

from horizontal (0 to 180 degrees)

Flow can be in any direction. Use what the plasma gives you 4

Lithium wells up the back and flows

out the top

This side is the top

Page 5: The Case for a Liquid Lithium-Surface Divertor · 2017. 6. 20. · components of fusion energy devices Most likely this would be at the divertor plate, but could also be considered

ssFESAC TEC Panel

June 20, 2017

Chicago, IL

FESAC TEC Panel

June 20, 2017

Chicago, IL

2. Application of the Technology

A molten surface is self healing. In the event of ELMs, Disruptions, or unforeseen events, the liquid metal can be reintroduced, and the surface contours restored. This is not the case for W or other solids

Lithium is the lowest Z possible, and tolerance is very high

Low-recycling regimes lead to better economics

5

Damage on tungsten PFCs (Photo: Egbert Wessel, Julich

Research Centre)

S. Krasheninnikov, et. al, Physcis

of Plasmas 10 (2003) 1678

Max Planck, IPP Garching,

http://www.ipp.mpg.de/16535/einfuehrung

a) Increase and control of T

at wall

b) Confinement enhancement

c) Full volume used for power

generation

d) Plasma more stable

e) Beta of 20% due to

flattened current density

profile

Page 6: The Case for a Liquid Lithium-Surface Divertor · 2017. 6. 20. · components of fusion energy devices Most likely this would be at the divertor plate, but could also be considered

ssFESAC TEC Panel

June 20, 2017

Chicago, IL

No cold hydrogen returns from wall: Plasma stays hot

Courtesy: L. Zakharov PPPL

What Very-Low Recycling Does for Fusion

Standard Case

Lithium Case – Radius Needed is 1/3 so Volume (and therefore cost) of

Fusion Power is Reduced by a Factor of ~27

Page 7: The Case for a Liquid Lithium-Surface Divertor · 2017. 6. 20. · components of fusion energy devices Most likely this would be at the divertor plate, but could also be considered

ssFESAC TEC Panel

June 20, 2017

Chicago, IL

FESAC TEC Panel

June 20, 2017

Chicago, IL

3. Expected Performance of the Technology – Critical Variablesa) Trenches should be barely overfilled and present a clean, fresh, conformal surface to the plasma

b) Hydrogenic species once absorbed need to be removed form the molten and returned to the fusion device

c) Lifetime of components must be high and the system deemed safe

7

Magnum PSI

Shot Parameters:

• Argon(5.8 Pam3s-1)

• 200 A Source Current

• Mag Field Setting 3

• Target Tilt 750

• Z Position -260 mm

• B = 0.0882 T

• Q = .223 MW/m2

• Shot Number 65

To Neutral Beam

To Divertor

From

Divertor

Page 8: The Case for a Liquid Lithium-Surface Divertor · 2017. 6. 20. · components of fusion energy devices Most likely this would be at the divertor plate, but could also be considered

ssFESAC TEC Panel

June 20, 2017

Chicago, IL

d) Flow rate should be high enough to keep the surface from too rapid of evaporation. 8

ΔT ~ 220C inside lithium after

10 seconds of plasma shot

Li surface temperature

increase of ~220C after 10

seconds of discharge

Higher T at the edge

where the flow slows

down

Conduction not convection is

dominant heat transfer mode. With

thin enough system, and redesigned

trench geometry, temperature limits

can be met at 10MW/m2 heat flux

Page 9: The Case for a Liquid Lithium-Surface Divertor · 2017. 6. 20. · components of fusion energy devices Most likely this would be at the divertor plate, but could also be considered

ssFESAC TEC Panel

June 20, 2017

Chicago, IL

FESAC TEC Panel

June 20, 2017

Chicago, IL

4. Design Variables – How to Optimize 9

a) Geometry of the structure containing the flow

The physics required for TEMHD-driven flow can be modeled with the following system of equations in COMSOL Multiphysics

Page 10: The Case for a Liquid Lithium-Surface Divertor · 2017. 6. 20. · components of fusion energy devices Most likely this would be at the divertor plate, but could also be considered

ssFESAC TEC Panel

June 20, 2017

Chicago, IL

FESAC TEC Panel

June 20, 2017

Chicago, IL

Can even design to eliminate droplet emission

Experiments determined which size trenches were unstable to being hit by ELMS and why droplets are sometimes expelled

10

P. Fiflis, M. Christenson,

M. Szott, K.

Kalathiparambil, D.N.

Ruzic, “Free surface

stability of liquid metal

plasma facing

components”, Nuclear

Fusion, August 2016

Page 11: The Case for a Liquid Lithium-Surface Divertor · 2017. 6. 20. · components of fusion energy devices Most likely this would be at the divertor plate, but could also be considered

ssFESAC TEC Panel

June 20, 2017

Chicago, IL

FESAC TEC Panel

June 20, 2017

Chicago, IL

b) Texturing of surfaces can aid or prevent wetting

Using a femtosecond laser creates a nano-texture which prevents wetting. Mirror-polishing the surface makes wetting much easier.

11

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

200 230 260 290 320 350 380 410 440 470

Conta

ct

angle

(°)

Substrate temperature (°)

Phase II results on textured SS Phase I results on textured SS

Phase I results on untextured SSCoherent Femtosecond Laser

200 250 300 3500

20

40

60

80

100

120

Co

nta

ct

an

gle

(d

eg

)

Surface temperature (°C)

161

77.67

roughness (nm)

Page 12: The Case for a Liquid Lithium-Surface Divertor · 2017. 6. 20. · components of fusion energy devices Most likely this would be at the divertor plate, but could also be considered

ssFESAC TEC Panel

June 20, 2017

Chicago, IL

FESAC TEC Panel

June 20, 2017

Chicago, IL

c) Alter the liquid metal itself: Sn-Li Eutectic? 12

Sn-Li has been shown to have Li surface segregation of a few atomic layers. Could one get some of the good PFC properties of Li yet have the much lower vapor pressure of Sn?

Page 13: The Case for a Liquid Lithium-Surface Divertor · 2017. 6. 20. · components of fusion energy devices Most likely this would be at the divertor plate, but could also be considered

ssFESAC TEC Panel

June 20, 2017

Chicago, IL

FESAC TEC Panel

June 20, 2017

Chicago, IL

d) Design of the delivery system 13

Develop new distribution system

(fully integrated distributor shown

here) to minimize potential for

lithium leakage

Evaporation

Wetting

Heater system tests

for the EAST design

Getting the lithium into the device, how to heat it once it is in the device, and how to engineer each of the sub-systems are all key design variables which can dramatically effect the outcome

Page 14: The Case for a Liquid Lithium-Surface Divertor · 2017. 6. 20. · components of fusion energy devices Most likely this would be at the divertor plate, but could also be considered

ssFESAC TEC Panel

June 20, 2017

Chicago, IL

FESAC TEC Panel

June 20, 2017

Chicago, IL

5. Risks and Uncertainties

a) Lithium Absorbs All the Tritium in the World There is a finite supply, and the inventory of a zero-recycling machine could be so large that there would not be enough for even one reactor

b) Lithium is Too Corrosive and Difficult to HandleLithium reacts violently with water, it leaches alloying materials out of steel embrittling it, and it has such a high surface tension that is creeps everywhere

c) Lithium gets Too Hot and Cannot Handle the Heat FluxLithium has an extremely high vapor pressure at 400-450C, and that is too low a temperature limit for a surface which has to tolerate 10-20 MW/m2

14

What could possibly go wrong ?

Page 15: The Case for a Liquid Lithium-Surface Divertor · 2017. 6. 20. · components of fusion energy devices Most likely this would be at the divertor plate, but could also be considered

ssFESAC TEC Panel

June 20, 2017

Chicago, IL

FESAC TEC Panel

June 20, 2017

Chicago, IL

6. Current Maturity in TRL Levels 15

TRL-3 is completed – independent systems of various types have been shown to work in a variety of locations across the world

TRL-4 has been done in some manners, but the independent parts need to be integrated together with heat and hydrogen removal

Page 16: The Case for a Liquid Lithium-Surface Divertor · 2017. 6. 20. · components of fusion energy devices Most likely this would be at the divertor plate, but could also be considered

ssFESAC TEC Panel

June 20, 2017

Chicago, IL

FESAC TEC Panel

June 20, 2017

Chicago, IL

7. Required Development for this Technology 16

a) Determine how quickly D (as a substitute for T) is absorbed by Li and how quickly it can be separated.

Pbase = 1 – 2 x 10-7

Torr

Page 17: The Case for a Liquid Lithium-Surface Divertor · 2017. 6. 20. · components of fusion energy devices Most likely this would be at the divertor plate, but could also be considered

ssFESAC TEC Panel

June 20, 2017

Chicago, IL

FESAC TEC Panel

June 20, 2017

Chicago, IL

In-Situ Environmental XPS, RGA and SEM Capabilities 17

TDS spectra tracked a number of species during the heating and cooling processes with and without a hydrogen background

o All samples loaded using the same procedure and heated at a ramp rate of 0.5 K s-1

Magnitudes of the secondary features for the M/q = 2 trend increased substantially in the presence of a hydrogen background. These same features also shifted in temperature

The key temperature value denoted by the primary change in inflection increased by 90 oC more energy required to overcome dissociation activation energy for appreciable hydrogen release

Studies have been done to look at how the

presence of oxygen and water affect the

evolution kinetics of hydrogen from LiH, but

little has been done to look at these same

kinetics in the presence of a hydrogen gas

environment

Page 18: The Case for a Liquid Lithium-Surface Divertor · 2017. 6. 20. · components of fusion energy devices Most likely this would be at the divertor plate, but could also be considered

ssFESAC TEC Panel

June 20, 2017

Chicago, IL

FESAC TEC Panel

June 20, 2017

Chicago, IL

Full Lithium Loop in a Tesla-level Steady State Toroidal Plasma

With EAST fields of 1.9-2.5 T near the edge (or

similar fields provided by permanent magnets),

the LiMIT module will require an EM Pump

driving current of 10’s of Amps, depending on

final design parameters – easily feasible

Induction heating is

the preferred heating

method since it is

faster than resistive

heating and takes

advantage of the

metallic properties of

the effluent Li stream

This is the

Key

Experiment

which is

Needed.

Can you

really take

out and put

back the D

fast

enough?

Page 19: The Case for a Liquid Lithium-Surface Divertor · 2017. 6. 20. · components of fusion energy devices Most likely this would be at the divertor plate, but could also be considered

ssFESAC TEC Panel

June 20, 2017

Chicago, IL

FESAC TEC Panel

June 20, 2017

Chicago, IL

Hybrid Illinois Device for Research and Applications (HIDRA)Stellarator as well as tokamak capabilities

o Vessel splits in half, easier access to install larger components

Magnet configuration

o 40 toroidal coils

o 4 helical coils

o 2 vertical field coils

o 84 ports, 6 sizes accessible

Stellarator operations in Greifswald as WEGA

o R0 = 0.72 m

o r = 0.19 m

o B0 = 0.087 – 0.5 T

o fgyr = 28 GHz, Pgyr = 10 kW cw, 40 kW pulsed

o fmag = 2.54 GHz, Pmag = 6 kW + 20 kW

o ne < 1×1018 m-3

o Te = 5 – 25 eV

o tpulse < 60 min

o Γ = 1×1022 m-2s-1

19

Page 20: The Case for a Liquid Lithium-Surface Divertor · 2017. 6. 20. · components of fusion energy devices Most likely this would be at the divertor plate, but could also be considered

ssFESAC TEC Panel

June 20, 2017

Chicago, IL

FESAC TEC Panel

June 20, 2017

Chicago, IL

b) Devise techniques to safely handle and utilize Li and Sn-Li

Assessment of wetting and lithium transport can be done in laboratory experiments

20

A Technology Program is Essential !Stainless steel

2 SS samples

loaded in the

chamber

Ʌripples = 780nm

3.5 cm

1 c

m

Heated stage

Lithium injector

Page 21: The Case for a Liquid Lithium-Surface Divertor · 2017. 6. 20. · components of fusion energy devices Most likely this would be at the divertor plate, but could also be considered

ssFESAC TEC Panel

June 20, 2017

Chicago, IL

FESAC TEC Panel

June 20, 2017

Chicago, IL

Sn-Li offers advantages which can be evaluated

Materials Characterization Test Stand (MCATS) includes improved sample stage and liquid metal injector

Manual screw-type injector allows for fine control of droplet deposition

Sample stage allows for smooth horizontal and vertical linear motion, as well as tilting for dynamic wetting angle testing

21

LEIS spectra indicating segregation

(80% Sn – 20% Li system)[3].

R. Bastasz, FED 72 (2004) 111-119.

Page 22: The Case for a Liquid Lithium-Surface Divertor · 2017. 6. 20. · components of fusion energy devices Most likely this would be at the divertor plate, but could also be considered

ssFESAC TEC Panel

June 20, 2017

Chicago, IL

FESAC TEC Panel

June 20, 2017

Chicago, IL

Sn-Li wetting test show that more research is needed

Tested Sn-Li wetting on stainless steel

Up to temperatures of 400°C, Sn-Li is highly non-wetting

In order to get Sn-Li to wet, we will need to investigate surface treatments, like plasma cleaning, polishing, or evaporative coatings

New results on polished W showed no wetting up to 435°C

22

Wetting below 90°

Page 23: The Case for a Liquid Lithium-Surface Divertor · 2017. 6. 20. · components of fusion energy devices Most likely this would be at the divertor plate, but could also be considered

ssFESAC TEC Panel

June 20, 2017

Chicago, IL

FESAC TEC Panel

June 20, 2017

Chicago, IL

c) Create and test a flowing lithium system for high heat fluxes

Experiments on EAST are crucial. Results from a World-Class tokamak will show that the technology is possible and that the results push the overall performance in the right directions.

Initial tests in HIDRA will prove the technology and robustness

23

EMC-Eirene modeling of HIDRA

plasmas, and equilibriums which

allow full-size placement of EAST

components in the HIDRA edge-

particle-flux.

Page 24: The Case for a Liquid Lithium-Surface Divertor · 2017. 6. 20. · components of fusion energy devices Most likely this would be at the divertor plate, but could also be considered

ssFESAC TEC Panel

June 20, 2017

Chicago, IL

DEVeX materials testing device

Coaxial plasma gun with theta-

pinch creates ELM-like heat

loads, depositing around 0.15

MJ m-2 over about 150 𝝁s.

Used for materials testing.

Jung, S et al. Fusion Engineering and Design 89.12

(2014)

Fiflis, P., et al. Nuclear Fusion 56.10 (2016) Christenson, M., Master’s Thesis, UIUC (2015)

Future work will utilize upgraded hardware

to inject plasma as a compact toroid,

increasing the target heat flux

Page 25: The Case for a Liquid Lithium-Surface Divertor · 2017. 6. 20. · components of fusion energy devices Most likely this would be at the divertor plate, but could also be considered

ssFESAC TEC Panel

June 20, 2017

Chicago, IL

FESAC TEC Panel

June 20, 2017

Chicago, IL

3-D Modelling of full lithium flows including MHD effects

Gaussian heat flux centered on shallow flow region

Maximum velocity increased to ~60 cm/s

o Goal of 70 cm/s to prevent lithium evaporation

The non-z temperature gradients contribute less to overall flow conditions

25

Page 26: The Case for a Liquid Lithium-Surface Divertor · 2017. 6. 20. · components of fusion energy devices Most likely this would be at the divertor plate, but could also be considered

ssFESAC TEC Panel

June 20, 2017

Chicago, IL

FESAC TEC Panel

June 20, 2017

Chicago, IL

Proof-of-Concept for high-heat flux, “fast” lithium flow across target

Impurity motion tracked to infer velocity

Good agreement between experimental and modeled velocities

26

Measured velocity (cm-s-1) Velocity from simulation results

(cm-s-1) at same locationsDeep part of

trenches

Turbulent region Deep part of

trenches

Turbulent region

1.4 4.2 1 - 5 3 - 10

Page 27: The Case for a Liquid Lithium-Surface Divertor · 2017. 6. 20. · components of fusion energy devices Most likely this would be at the divertor plate, but could also be considered

ssFESAC TEC Panel

June 20, 2017

Chicago, IL

HIDRA can also be operated as a tokamak to boost heat flux

Toroidal magnetic field B0 = 1.43 T

−Plasma characteristics without RF heating:

Plasma current IP = 45 – 60 kA

Ohmic heating power Pohm = 100 – 130 kW

Peak electron density ne = 1.6×1019 m-3

Peak electron temperature Te = 600 – 900 eV

Peak ion temperature Ti = 150 – 250 eV

Impurity level Zeff = 3 – 6

Energy confinement time τE = 3 – 5 ms

Pulse Duration 50 ms

Tokamak operation from 1975 –1982 used for studying RF and Lower Hybrid heating scenarios

Page 28: The Case for a Liquid Lithium-Surface Divertor · 2017. 6. 20. · components of fusion energy devices Most likely this would be at the divertor plate, but could also be considered

ssFESAC TEC Panel

June 20, 2017

Chicago, IL

FESAC TEC Panel

June 20, 2017

Chicago, IL

Conclusions 28

Liquid metals offer a superior alternate approach to the most demanding PFC challenges of fusion. Not only could they withstand high and off-normal heat fluxes without permanent damage, they offer entire new regimes of fusion device operation.

The low-recycling wall, if it can be made to work, could reduce the size and cost of fusion energy devices ten-fold.

To realize this awesome potential, further innovative technology development is required. The US is the present leader in this field. It is imperative to the future of fusion energy that such programs continue and grow. Liquid-lithium surfaces are an innovation which could fulfill fusion’s promise.