the beverage alcohol industry and alcohol policy isaje helsinki 1 september 2006 peter anderson

49
The beverage alcohol industry and alcohol policy ISAJE Helsinki 1 September 2006 Peter Anderson

Upload: audrey-mckinney

Post on 22-Dec-2015

220 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: The beverage alcohol industry and alcohol policy ISAJE Helsinki 1 September 2006 Peter Anderson

The beverage alcohol industry and alcohol policy

ISAJEHelsinki1 September 2006

Peter Anderson

Page 2: The beverage alcohol industry and alcohol policy ISAJE Helsinki 1 September 2006 Peter Anderson

Contents:

1. Who is the alcohol industry?

2. How does the alcohol industry represent itself?

3. What do social aspect organizations of the alcohol industry stand for?

4. Two examples

5. Two cases

6. Some questions

Page 3: The beverage alcohol industry and alcohol policy ISAJE Helsinki 1 September 2006 Peter Anderson

Contents:

1. Who is the alcohol industry?

2. How does the alcohol industry represent itself?

3. What do social aspect organizations of the alcohol industry stand for?

4. Two examples

5. Two cases

6. Some questions

Page 4: The beverage alcohol industry and alcohol policy ISAJE Helsinki 1 September 2006 Peter Anderson

Concentration in the global beer market 1979-2004

Corporation Country1979/80 2004

Inbev Belgium * 13.9% (1)SABMiller UK 4.83% (2-Miller), 12.0% (2)

0.93% (17-SAB)Anheuser-Busch USA 6.48% (1) 10.8% (3)Heineken NV Netherlands 2.84% (4) 7.6% (4)Carlsberg Breweries A/S Denmark 3.08% (3) 4.3% (5)Molson Coors Brewing Co. USA + 4.0% (6)Scottish Courage UK + 3.4% (7)Grupo Modelo Mexico 1.34% (12) 2.9% (8)Kirin Japan * 2.5% (9)Baltic Beverages Holding Russia * 2.5% (10)Total market share of top ten companies 27.99% 63.90%

Global Market Share

Jernigan 2006

Page 5: The beverage alcohol industry and alcohol policy ISAJE Helsinki 1 September 2006 Peter Anderson

Concentration in the global distilled spirits market, 1991-2003

Corporation Country of HQ

Global Market Share 1991

Global Market Share 2004

UDV (Diageo) UK 10.5% (1) 14.7% (1)

Pernod Ricard France 5.7% (4) 12.9% (2)

UB Group India 3.7%(8) 8.5%(3)

Jim Beam (Fortune) US 4.8% (6) 5.9% (4)

Bacardi Bermuda 7.7% (3) 5.8% (5)

Suntory Japan 4% (7) 2.7% (6)

Constellation Brands US 2.5% (10) 2.5% (7)

Brown-Forman US * 2.4% (8)

V&S Vin and Sprit AB Sweden * 2.2% (9)

Gruppo Campari Italy * 2.2% (10)

Total share of top ten   57% 60.0%

Jernigan 2006

Page 6: The beverage alcohol industry and alcohol policy ISAJE Helsinki 1 September 2006 Peter Anderson

Contents:

1. Who is the alcohol industry?

2. How does the alcohol industry represent itself?

3. What do social aspect organizations of the alcohol industry stand for?

4. Two examples

5. Two cases

6. Some questions

Page 7: The beverage alcohol industry and alcohol policy ISAJE Helsinki 1 September 2006 Peter Anderson

1. The companies themselves, e.g. Diageo

2. Category Associations (Beer, spirits, wines)

3. Social aspects organizations

Page 8: The beverage alcohol industry and alcohol policy ISAJE Helsinki 1 September 2006 Peter Anderson
Page 9: The beverage alcohol industry and alcohol policy ISAJE Helsinki 1 September 2006 Peter Anderson
Page 10: The beverage alcohol industry and alcohol policy ISAJE Helsinki 1 September 2006 Peter Anderson

Dangers facing beverage alcohol industry

taxes; vigorous drink driving measures; restrictions on availability; treatment services; advertising restrictions; warning labels; and ingredient labelling.

Tim AmblerGrand Metropolitan, 1984

Page 11: The beverage alcohol industry and alcohol policy ISAJE Helsinki 1 September 2006 Peter Anderson

“It is generally agreed that the tobacco industry reacted to not dissimilar threats in a passive, inadequate manner and most of all too late …..”

Tim AmblerGrand Metropolitan, 1984

Page 12: The beverage alcohol industry and alcohol policy ISAJE Helsinki 1 September 2006 Peter Anderson

The Portman Group Allied DomecqBacardi Brown Forman BrandsBeverage Brands (UK) LtdCarlsberg UKCoors Brewers UKDiageo Great Britain Interbred UK Period Ricard UKScottish and Newcastle

1989

www.portman-group.org.uk

United Kingdom

"The majority of people who drink alcohol enjoy it without causing harm to themselves or others.  The Portman Group acts to reduce the misuse of alcohol by the minority through a strategy of working with other organisations locally and nationally."

Page 13: The beverage alcohol industry and alcohol policy ISAJE Helsinki 1 September 2006 Peter Anderson

European Forum for Responsible Drinking (ex Amsterdam group)

Allied Domecq Bacardi-MartiniBrown-Forman Diageo Groupe Pernod Ricard Moët Hennessy Rémy Cointreau V&S Group

1990

www.amsterdamgroup.org

Europe

Communicate thought leadership by developing tools that deliver evidence-based balanced policies. 

Provide the intellectual base to drive positive change in attitude and drinking behaviour

Develop and promote programmes that seek to reduce alcohol related harm in partnership with most relevant stakeholders.

Promote the responsibilities of all social actors in the supply chain.

Page 14: The beverage alcohol industry and alcohol policy ISAJE Helsinki 1 September 2006 Peter Anderson

The International Center for Alcohol Policies

Allied Domecq PLC Asahi Breweries, LTD. Bacardi-Martini Brown-Forman Corporation Coors Brewing Company Diageo PLC Foster's Group Limited Heineken N.V. Molson SABMiller PLC

1996

http://www.icap.org

Global

To promote understanding of the role of alcohol in society and help reduce the abuse of alcohol worldwide.

To encourage dialogue and pursue partnerships involving the beverage alcohol industry, the public health community and others interested in alcohol policy.

Page 15: The beverage alcohol industry and alcohol policy ISAJE Helsinki 1 September 2006 Peter Anderson

Social Aspect Organizations Funded by Alcohol Industry

0

5

10

15

20

25

1971 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000

Worldwide Brewing Alliance: Global social responsibility initiativesBritish Beer & Pub Association, 2003

From Babor, 2006

Page 16: The beverage alcohol industry and alcohol policy ISAJE Helsinki 1 September 2006 Peter Anderson

Contents:

1. Who is the alcohol industry?

2. How does the alcohol industry represent itself?

3. What do social aspect organizations of the alcohol industry stand for?

4. Two examples

5. Two cases

6. Some questions

Page 17: The beverage alcohol industry and alcohol policy ISAJE Helsinki 1 September 2006 Peter Anderson

1. There is a cultural complexity to alcohol consumption across Europe. 

2. Alcohol-related harm is largely related to high-risk drinking behaviour. 

3. Any alcohol harm reduction strategies should be underpinned by robust evidence and sound data.

4. The most effective harm reduction strategies are those that bring about sustainable results towards a reduction in risky drinking behaviour.

5. Reducing alcohol-related harm requires a broad societal commitment and a concerted effort of all relevant stakeholders.

Page 18: The beverage alcohol industry and alcohol policy ISAJE Helsinki 1 September 2006 Peter Anderson

Stakeholder analysis

0123456789

10

Po

licy

imp

act

Regulation Education Implementation of law

Policy options

NGO

GO

AI

Page 19: The beverage alcohol industry and alcohol policy ISAJE Helsinki 1 September 2006 Peter Anderson

Stakeholder analysis

-4

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

SD

aw

ay f

rom

med

ian

of

scal

e

Regulation Education Implementation of law

Policy options

NGO

GO

AI

Page 20: The beverage alcohol industry and alcohol policy ISAJE Helsinki 1 September 2006 Peter Anderson

1. Attempting to influence governmental organizations;

2. Becoming members of international organizations to broaden policy influence and respectability;

3. Recruiting policy advisers and scientists;

4. Creating social aspects organizations in low income countries; and

5. Preparing and promoting consensus statements and codes of practice.

Page 21: The beverage alcohol industry and alcohol policy ISAJE Helsinki 1 September 2006 Peter Anderson

Open lobby

Open: classical, accepted and ‘legal’ lobby:

• Meetings with politicians• Influencing political

agenda• Personal networking/ Old

Boys Clubs

Page 22: The beverage alcohol industry and alcohol policy ISAJE Helsinki 1 September 2006 Peter Anderson

Hidden lobby

• Strong influence in the decision making process within the Ministry of Health

• They won the right of formal meetings with all partners: they want to be informed about every political strategy beforehand

• They initiated an informal subgroup with some managers in the Ministry

• They gained regular meetings with the Secretary General of the Ministry of Health.

Page 23: The beverage alcohol industry and alcohol policy ISAJE Helsinki 1 September 2006 Peter Anderson

Hidden Lobby

• At the most critical political moments (a marketing ban, a happy hour ban or a excise-duty rise) they have a direct access to the Minister of Health by a former Minister of Home Affairs who is commissioner of the drinks industry

Page 24: The beverage alcohol industry and alcohol policy ISAJE Helsinki 1 September 2006 Peter Anderson

Contents:

1. Who is the alcohol industry?

2. How does the alcohol industry represent itself?

3. What do social aspect organizations of the alcohol industry stand for?

4. Two examples

5. Two cases

6. Some questions

Page 25: The beverage alcohol industry and alcohol policy ISAJE Helsinki 1 September 2006 Peter Anderson

Babor and Xuan

Alcohol policyresearch andthe grey literature

A Tale of Two Surveys

NAT, 2004

Page 26: The beverage alcohol industry and alcohol policy ISAJE Helsinki 1 September 2006 Peter Anderson

Compared results of:

ICAP survey of 48/114 (42%) countries, representing 22% of the world’s population

WHO survey of 118/175 (67%) countries, representing 86% pf the world’s population

Page 27: The beverage alcohol industry and alcohol policy ISAJE Helsinki 1 September 2006 Peter Anderson

Compared Prevalence of existing policies between 2 surveys

Reported on results of partnerships with the beverage alcohol industry from ICAP survey

Page 28: The beverage alcohol industry and alcohol policy ISAJE Helsinki 1 September 2006 Peter Anderson

Compared Prevalence of existing policies between 2 surveys

Reported on results of partnerships with the beverage alcohol industry from ICAP survey

Page 29: The beverage alcohol industry and alcohol policy ISAJE Helsinki 1 September 2006 Peter Anderson
Page 30: The beverage alcohol industry and alcohol policy ISAJE Helsinki 1 September 2006 Peter Anderson

Regarding the issue of partnerships with the alcoholic beverage industry, 50% of the 48 respondents answered yes to the question:

“Do you view the beverage alcoholindustry as an effective partner in developing alcohol policies in your country?”

Page 31: The beverage alcohol industry and alcohol policy ISAJE Helsinki 1 September 2006 Peter Anderson

Among the respondents answering yes (N = 24), respondents were then asked to list the topic areas for potential partnerships

Page 32: The beverage alcohol industry and alcohol policy ISAJE Helsinki 1 September 2006 Peter Anderson
Page 33: The beverage alcohol industry and alcohol policy ISAJE Helsinki 1 September 2006 Peter Anderson

But, ICAP used the wrong denominator, 24,

the respondents who answered yes to the question “Do you view the beverage alcoholindustry as an effective partner in developing alcohol policies in your country?”,

instead of the total sample of 48.

Page 34: The beverage alcohol industry and alcohol policy ISAJE Helsinki 1 September 2006 Peter Anderson
Page 35: The beverage alcohol industry and alcohol policy ISAJE Helsinki 1 September 2006 Peter Anderson
Page 36: The beverage alcohol industry and alcohol policy ISAJE Helsinki 1 September 2006 Peter Anderson

Munro

AN ADDICTION AGENCY’S COLLABORATION WITH THE DRINKS INDUSTRY: MOO JOOSE AS A CASE STUDY

Addiction, 2005

Page 37: The beverage alcohol industry and alcohol policy ISAJE Helsinki 1 September 2006 Peter Anderson

Alcohol Education Australia Ltd

In August 2002, the Alcohol and Drug Foundation - Queensland (ADFQ) announced the formation, in conjunction with the alcohol industry, of Alcohol Education Australia Ltd. (AEA), to “promote responsible drinking and moderation in the consumption of alcohol.”

Page 38: The beverage alcohol industry and alcohol policy ISAJE Helsinki 1 September 2006 Peter Anderson

The host, Alcohol and Drug Foundation – Queensland, was a non-government, not-for-profit body with a thirty-year history. It conducted treatment services in residential, custodial and community settings, a prevention program, an annual conference, and published a quarterly magazine.

Page 39: The beverage alcohol industry and alcohol policy ISAJE Helsinki 1 September 2006 Peter Anderson

According to the Alcohol Education Australia prospectus: “The Company is owned by the Alcohol and Drug Foundation - Queensland, and was set up as a separate legal entity for the purpose of being recognised as a national public health organisation.”

A board of nine directors will govern AEA, three appointed by each of ADFQ, industry stakeholders, and community stakeholders.

Page 40: The beverage alcohol industry and alcohol policy ISAJE Helsinki 1 September 2006 Peter Anderson

The Moo Joose case

Within months of forming AEA, ADFQ intervened in a licensing case to support a manufacturer whose application to sell alcoholic milk (Moo Joose) was rejected by a state licensing authority. Two principals of ADFQ, the president, and the CEO submitted an eight-page statement in defence of Moo Joose and both appeared before the tribunal as witnesses for the manufacturer.

Page 41: The beverage alcohol industry and alcohol policy ISAJE Helsinki 1 September 2006 Peter Anderson

In supporting Moo Joose, ADFQ reversed a previous policy.

In 1997 ADFQ declared Candy Shots, a vodka-based pre-mixed drink marketed in flavours of chocolate, banana, caramel, and marshmallow, “dangerous,” and called for proscription.

The CEO said, “But everyone knows that underage drinking occurs and this is just the type of drink that will make it easier for kids to get started.”

Page 42: The beverage alcohol industry and alcohol policy ISAJE Helsinki 1 September 2006 Peter Anderson

Features of ADFQ’s defence of Moo Joose included:

The narrow neck of the bottle and the screw top would militate against the risk of drink spiking.

The four-pack was “a harm minimisation strategy” that would limit consumption.

The milk content would prevent excessive use and intoxication.

Page 43: The beverage alcohol industry and alcohol policy ISAJE Helsinki 1 September 2006 Peter Anderson

The Outcome

Liquor Licensing Victoria rejected Moo Joose because it saw alcoholic milk as a corruption of a product known to be healthy and one that might easily be taken up by children.

Page 44: The beverage alcohol industry and alcohol policy ISAJE Helsinki 1 September 2006 Peter Anderson

Contents:

1. Who is the alcohol industry?

2. How does the alcohol industry represent itself?

3. What do social aspect organizations of the alcohol industry stand for?

4. Two examples

5. Two cases

6. Some questions

Page 45: The beverage alcohol industry and alcohol policy ISAJE Helsinki 1 September 2006 Peter Anderson

Two cases

‘Working for the alcohol industry’

‘social aspects organization’

Page 46: The beverage alcohol industry and alcohol policy ISAJE Helsinki 1 September 2006 Peter Anderson

Areas where industry interests interact with alcohol science

• Industry sponsorship of research funding organizations

• Direct financing of university-based scientists and centers

• Research conducted through contract research organizations

• Research conducted by trade organizations and SAOs

• Efforts to influence public perceptions of research, research findings and alcohol policies

• Publication of scientific documents and support of scientific journals

• Sponsorship of scientific conferences and presentations at scientific conferences

Babor 2006

Page 47: The beverage alcohol industry and alcohol policy ISAJE Helsinki 1 September 2006 Peter Anderson

Areas where industry interests interact with alcohol science

• Industry sponsorship of research funding organizations

• Direct financing of university-based scientists and centers

• Research conducted through contract research organizations

• Research conducted by trade organizations and SAOs

• Efforts to influence public perceptions of research, research findings and alcohol policies

• Publication of scientific documents and support of scientific journals

• Sponsorship of scientific conferences and presentations at scientific conferences

• Involvement with alcohol science journal editors

Babor 2006

Page 48: The beverage alcohol industry and alcohol policy ISAJE Helsinki 1 September 2006 Peter Anderson

Contents:

1. Who is the alcohol industry?

2. How does the alcohol industry represent itself?

3. What do social aspect organizations of the alcohol industry stand for?

4. Two examples

5. Two cases

6. Some questions

Page 49: The beverage alcohol industry and alcohol policy ISAJE Helsinki 1 September 2006 Peter Anderson

Some questions:

1. Does involvement of journal editors with the alcohol industry matter?

2. If so, should we do something about it?

3. Should there be conflict of interest statements by journal editors and editorial boards on journal websites and in the journals’ front pages?