the application of fluidized fly ash a new kind of waste material...
TRANSCRIPT
INSTITUTE OF FUNDMENTAL TECHNOLOGICAL RESEARCH
POLISH ACADEMY OF SCIENCES
WARSAW POLANDWARSAW, POLAND
The application of fluidized fly ash a new kind of waste materiala new kind of waste material
in concrete technology
Daria Jóźwiak-Niedźwiedzka
Anna Maria Island, X Workshop
1
CONTENTSCONTENTS
Fluidized fly ash what is it? Fluidized fly ash, what is it?
Aims of research
Examples of test results
Conclusions Conclusions
Anna Maria Island, X Workshop November 4-6, 2009
Fluidized fly ash, what is it? 2
Reduction of harmful emission to the atmosphereDirective 2001/80/WE
(reduction of sulphur and NOx)( p x)
New coal combustion technique in power industryFluidized bed coal combustion
New kind of fly ashCirculating Fluidized Bed Combustion Fly Ash
CFBCFA
Anna Maria Island, X Workshop November 4-6, 2009
CFBCFA
Fluidized fly ash, what is it? 3
CFBC fly ashConventional fly ash
• Temp. of combustion ok. 850ºC
G i h i l
• Temp. of combustion ok. 1400ºC
G i h i l • Grains non-spherical
• Glassy phase is not present
• Grains spherical
• Glassy phase is present
Anna Maria Island, X Workshop November 4-6, 2009
Fluidized fly ash, what is it?
Properties of CFBCFA:
4
• high content of different calcium sulphur compounds• high content of free lime
Properties of CFBCFA:
• high content of free lime• higher loss of ignition compared to standard fly ash
Anna Maria Island, X Workshop November 4-6, 2009
5Fluidized fly ash, what is it?
Circulating Fluidized Bed Combustion Fly Ash does not meet the requirements defined by European Standard EN 450 or t e equ e e ts de ed by u opea Sta da d 50 oASTM C618 to be used for cement or concrete production
CFBC FA does not conform to standard requirements as a concrete additive
Accordingly, it has to be treated on a case-by-case basis in relation to its applicationrelation to its application
Anna Maria Island, X Workshop November 4-6, 2009
Fluidized fly ash – current applications
C t li ti f fl idi d fl h
6
Current applications of fluidized fly ashin the infrastructure:
Hi h i i d d t ti ( t bili• Highway engineering and road construction (a stabilizer -
soil reinforcement by injection at the site)
• Geotechnics (hardening slurries)
• Hydrotechnics (filter diaphragms in soil foundations
protecting underground water against contamination)
also
• Filling underground structures (old coal mines) in land
reclamation
Anna Maria Island, X Workshop November 4-6, 2009
reclamation
• Macro levelling
Soil stabilization by means of 'jetgrouting‘ method with application of
7Fluidized fly ash – current applications
y j g g pp
Flubet® (mechanically activated CFBCFA) at the A4 highway section near
Ruda Śląska
Anna Maria Island, X Workshop November 4-6, 2009
Glinicki, Nowak, Maslanka
Crevice ditch with slurry containing
8Fluidized fly ash – current applications
Crevice ditch with slurry containing
Flubet® (mechanically activated CFBCFA)
Anna Maria Island, X Workshop November 4-6, 2009
Glinicki, Nowak, Maslanka
9
Portland cement concretes with addition of
GRANT 2006-2010
Portland cement concretes with addition of fluidized bed combustion fly ashesProject 2006-2010Project 2006-2010
Research project is oriented at determination whether and how CFBC flyResearch project is oriented at determination whether and how CFBC fly ash may be used as partial replacement for Portland cement in structural
concretes
Arguments for such investigation:- reduction of waste material deposits
Sustainable development
p- replacement of Portland cement (lower cost and reduction of powder and gas
Anna Maria Island, X Workshop November 4-6, 2009
emissions related to cement production)
R h j 2006 2010
GRANT 2006-2010 10
Research project 2006 – 2010
mixture composition and workability
mechanical properties (strength, Young’s modulus, etc.)
stability of the pore microstructure in the fresh mix
resistance against carbonation
corrosion of steel reinforcement
resistance against chloride ions penetration
frost resistance and scaling resistance
bond to steel and non-metallic reinforcement
Anna Maria Island, X Workshop November 4-6, 2009
GRANT 2006-2010 11
Mixture composition
Concrete A, ordinary concrete - XC3, XD2, XF1, XA1
Concrete B, high strength concrete - XC4, XD3, XF1, XA1
Concrete C, air-entrained concrete for bridges - XC4, XD3, XF4
XCXC -- corrosion caused by carbonationcorrosion caused by carbonationXDXD -- corrosion caused by chlorides not originated from seacorrosion caused by chlorides not originated from sea--waterwaterXFXF –– frostfrost--saltsalt aggressionaggressionXAXA -- chemically aggressive environmentchemically aggressive environment
Anna Maria Island, X Workshop November 4-6, 2009
GRANT 2006-2010
Mixture composition
12
A B C
Mixture composition
A B C
OC HSC air-entrained
w/b = 0.55 w/b = 0.45 w/b = 0.45
C=320 kg/m3 C=360 kg/m3 C=380 kg/m3g/ g/ g/
l f 0% % d 30% f b C CReplacement of 0%, 15% and 30% of cement mass by CFBC
fly ash from hard coal and from lignite
Anna Maria Island, X Workshop November 4-6, 2009
GRANT 2006-2010, Examples of test results – Compressive strength
A0 B0 C0
13
OC HSC air-entrained
w/b = 0.55 w/b = 0.45 w/b = 0.45
Betony A - rozwój wytrzymałości na ściskanie
60
70
80
anie
[MP
a]
Betony B - rozwój wytrzymałości na ściskanie
60
70
80an
ie [M
Pa]
Betony C - rozwój wytrzymałości na ściskanie
60
70
80
nie
[MP
a]
fc [MPa] fc [MPa] fc [MPa]
fcA020
30
40
50
wyt
rzym
ałość
na ś
cisk
a
20
30
40
50
ytrz
ymał
ość
na ś
cisk
a
20
30
40
50
ytrz
ymał
ość
na ś
cisk
a
fcA0 fcA15K fcA30K fcA15T fcA30T
0 60 120 180 240 300 360czas dojrzewania [dni]
10
w fcB0 fcB15K fcB30K fcB15T fcB30T
0 60 120 180 240 300 360czas dojrzewania [dni]
10
wy
fcC0 fcC15K fcC30K fcC15T fcC30T
0 60 120 180 240 300 360czas dojrzewania [dni]
10
wy
Maturity period [days] Maturity period [days] Maturity period [days]
Anna Maria Island, X Workshop November 4-6, 2009
max: A15T min: A0 i A15K
max: B0 i B15T min: B30K
max: C30K min: C30T
Śliwiński et al.
A0 B0 C0
GRANT 2006-2010, Examples of test results – THIN SECTIONS 14
OC HSC air-entrained
w/b = 0.55 w/b = 0.45 w/b = 0.45
PLANE POLARIZED LIGHTblue dye, magnification 40x
Anna Maria Island, X Workshop November 4-6, 2009
GRANT 2006-2010, Examples of test results – THIN SECTIONS 15
A15T A15KA15T
A30T A30K
Anna Maria Island, X Workshop November 4-6, 2009
15% and 30% of lignite 15% and 30% of hard coal
GRANT 2006-2010, Examples of test results – THIN SECTIONS
A30K
16
30% of hard coal
A30TA30T30% of lignite30% of lignite
Unburned coal particles
Anna Maria Island, X Workshop November 4-6, 2009
17GRANT 2006-2010, Examples of test results – THIN SECTIONS
PLANE POLARIZED LIGHTyellow dye, magnification 40x
Air entrained concretes w/b 0 45
C0, without CFBCFA C30K, 30% of CFBCFA from hard coal
Air-entrained concretes, w/b = 0.45
C0, t out C C C30K, 30% of CFBCFA from hard coal
Anna Maria Island, X Workshop November 4-6, 2009
18GRANT 2006-2010, Examples of test results – THIN SECTIONS
UV LIGHTyellow dye, magnification 40x
Air entrained concretes w/b 0 45Air-entrained concretes, w/b = 0.45
C0, without CFBCFA C30K, 30% of CFBCFA from hard coalC0, t out C C C30K, 30% of CFBCFA from hard coal
Anna Maria Island, X Workshop November 4-6, 2009
Test of air content in fresh mix revealed a proportional increase of the dosage of AEA, to achieve the target air content (6%), along with increasing content of
19GRANT 2006-2010, Examples of test results – microstructure of air voids
The spacing factor of air void system vs the content of CFBCFA
AEA, to achieve the target air content (6%), along with increasing content of CFBCFA
Spacing factor L, mm
Content of CFBCFA, %
The content of CFBCFA > 30% strongly influences on the microstructure of air-voids by missing the micro pores which play the major role in the frost
Anna Maria Island, X Workshop November 4-6, 2009
Glinicki, Zielińskiresistance of concrete
20GRANT 2006-2009, Examples of test results – THIN SECTIONS
C30K 30% f CFBCFA f h d l
UV LIGHT, yellow dye, magnification 40xC30K, 30% of CFBCFA from hard coal
Anna Maria Island, X Workshop November 4-6, 2009
Crossed polarized light, yellow dye, magnification 40x
21GRANT 2006-2010, Examples of test results – THIN SECTIONS
1.2 mm
C30K, 30% of CFBCFA f h d l
2 mmfrom hard coal
Anna Maria Island, X Workshop November 4-6, 2009
Carbonation zoneC0, without CFBCFA
EN 13295:2004
GRANT 2006-2010, Examples of test results – carbonation 22
specimens 100x100 mm, 1% CO2
0.55/30K = w/b=0.55, 30% of CFBCFA from hard coal0 45/15T w/b 0 45 15% of CFBCFA from brown coal
10
12
m
0,55/30K
0,55/15K
0.45/15T = w/b=0.45, 15% of CFBCFA from brown coal
6
8
0
onat
ion,
mm 0,55/30T
0,55/15T
0,55/0
4
6
eep
of c
arbo 0,45/30T
0,45/30K
0,45/0
0
2
14 28 56 90
de
0,45/0
0,45/15K
0,45/15T
Anna Maria Island, X Workshop November 4-6, 2009
14 28 56 90age, days
Czarnecki, Woyciechowski
GRANT 2006-2010, Examples of test results – scaling resistance
h d lCEN/TS 12390-9:2007, slab test
23
1,4
scaling [kg/m2]
30%K
K - Katowice, hard coal
T - Turów, lignite
30%T
0 8
1,0
1,2
critical value
30%K 30%T
0,4
0,6
0,8
15%K15%T
0,0
0,2
0 7 14 21 28 35 42 49 56
0%
0 7 14 21 28 35 42 49 56number of cycles [days]
Scaling resistance is decreasing with increased CFBCFA content
Anna Maria Island, X Workshop November 4-6, 2009
g gand unburned carbon content
GRANT 2006-2010, Examples of test results – chloride ions penetration
Nordtest Method BUILD 492
24
14
16
18
28 dni 90 dni 180 dni
6
8
10
12
14D
, x10
-12
m2/
s
w/b = 0.45non air-
entrained
0
2
4
6
B0 B15K B15T B30K B30T
K - hard coal T - lignite
entrained concretes
12
14
16
18
2/s
28 dni 90 dni 180 dni
T lignite
2
4
6
8
10
D, x
10-1
2 m
2
air-entrained concretes
Anna Maria Island, X Workshop November 4-6, 2009
0
2
C0 C15K C15T C30K C30T
Results – resistivity
GRANT 2006-2010, Examples of test results – resistivity 25
y
resistivity [k om cm] (K) Katowice - hard coal(T) Turów brown coal
150
180
30%K
(T) Turów - brown coal
90
12030%K30%T
15%K
30
6015%K15%T
0%0
20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180
0%
Anna Maria Island, X Workshop November 4-6, 2009
time [days]
26
Conclusions:
Conclusions
Positive effects:• Increase of long term compressive strength by 10% CFBCFA h• Increase of long term compressive strength by 10%
• Non-steady chloride migration coefficient is decreasing
with CFBCFA content
C t i ti it i i i ith CFBCFA t t
CFBCFA has compacted the microstucture
of concrete• Concrete resistivity is increasing with CFBCFA content
Negative effects:Negative effects:• Scaling resistance is decreasing with increased CFBCFA content and
unburned carbon
Addition of CFBCFA slightly increases the depth of carbonation• Addition of CFBCFA slightly increases the depth of carbonation
• Required microstructure of air entrained voids is more difficult to be
obtained but possible
Anna Maria Island, X Workshop November 4-6, 2009
Conclusions:
Conclusions 27
Conclusions:
After preliminary test results it seemsAfter preliminary test results, it seems admissible to use Circulating Fluidized Bed C b ti Fl A h f t t l tCombustion Fly Ash for structural concretes, with some restrictions
Anna Maria Island, X Workshop November 4-6, 2009
28
Thank you for attention
Anna Maria Island, X Workshop November 4-6, 2009