the annual cycle of precipitation over the tropical …biasutti/papers/seminar_nd.pdfthe annual...
TRANSCRIPT
The Annual Cycle of Precipitation
over the Tropical Atlantic, South America, and
Africa.Mutual Influences of Land and Ocean.
Michela Biasutti
David S. Battisti and Edward S. Sarachik Co-chairs
Seattle, July 7, 2003
1
OUTLINE
• Motivation
• Ocean-Land relationship in Tropical Atlantic Variability (TAV)
• Similarity between TAV and Annual Cycle (AC)
• Method
• Models
• Experimental design
• Results
• Local Control of Land Precipitation (uncoupled)
• Local Control of Ocean Precipitation (uncoupled)
• Remote Control of Land Precipitation (uncoupled)
• Remote Control of Ocean Precipitation (uncoupled & coupled)
• Conclusions
• Implications2
Motivation: SST & LAND PRECIPITATION
Correlation of precip and SST
60E 90E 120E 150E 180 150W 120W 90W 60W 30W 0 30E 60E 30S
15S
EQ.
15N
30N
45N
60NMitchell/Kaplan 1950:2000 (JJASO Sahel Rainfall, JJAS SST)
60E 90E 120E 150E 180 150W 120W 90W 60W 30W 0 30E 60E 30S
15S
EQ.
15N
30N
45N
60NMitchell/Kaplan 1950:2000 (FMAM FQI, FMAM SST)
−0.8 −0.6 −0.4 −0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8
• Fact: Global SST is corre-lated with precipitation inSahel and Northeast Brazil.
• Working Hypothesis: Trop-ical Atlantic SST influencesland precipitation.
• Open Question: What arethe mechanisms?
• Is the SST influence di-rect?
• Is it mediated throughchanges in oceanic precip-itation?
• Is there a feedback: canland precip affect SST?
3
Motivation: AC & TAV ANALOGUE
• Atmospheric processes bring the SST signal inland ⇒ the same fastatmospheric dynamics must be involved in both the AC and the TAV.
• The gross features of AC and TAV in the deep tropics look alike
4
Motivation: AC & TAV ANALOGUE
meridional modecross-equatorial SST gradient
cross-equatorial wind towards warm SSTmeridional shift of ITCZ towards warm SST
5
Method: THE MODELS
• Uncoupled Community Climate Model Version 3 (CCM3) T42resolution.
⇒ The precipitation over Africa and South America is overestimated.
⇒ Tropical land is too cold (especially the Sahara).
• Coupled CCM3 coupled to a Slab Ocean Model (SOM) in the tropicalAtlantic only (prescribed SST elsewhere).
⇒ SST responds to radiative and turbulent heat fluxes.
⇒ No ocean dynamics (Ocean Heat Transport Convergence isparameterized with a flux adjustment, the Q-flux).
⇒ Climatology of CCM3+SOM is (by construction) nearly identical tothe climatology of CCM3.
6
Method:THE IDEA BEHIND THE EXPERIMENTS
We want to identify:
• what features of the AC over land and ocean are locally forced?
• what features of the AC over land and ocean are remotely forced?
• the mechanisms of mutual influences between land and ocean regions
IDEA: we suppress the AC of forcings over land and ocean regionsseparately ⇒ we can separate out local and remote responses.
7
Method: THE FORCINGS• Insolation over land.
• Insolation over ocean.
• Q-flux.
• Elevated Condensational Heating(Qcond) in selected areas
} or SST
8
Method: EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN
• Fixed insolation over land, AC of Ocean Forcings (Qflux+Insolation orSST)
⇓AC over LAND is a REMOTE response to AC over oceanAC over OCEAN is a LOCAL response
• Fixed Ocean Forcings, AC of insolation over land⇓
AC over LAND is a LOCAL responseAC over OCEAN is a REMOTE response to AC over land
9
RESULTS
A. LOCAL LAND
• AC of insolation;March SST⇒ AC of land precip
B. LOCAL OCEAN
• AC of SST;March Insolation⇒ AC of ocean precip
C. REMOTE LAND
• AC of SST;March Insolation⇒ AC of land precip
D. REMOTE OCEAN
• AC of land insolation;March SST⇒ AC of ocean
10
Results: LOCAL LAND
90W 60W 30W 0 30E
30S
15S
EQ.
15N
30N
CTL − 1st EOF of PRECIP (56%)
J F M A M J J A S O N D−1.5
−1
−0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
21st PC
CTL:North-South displacement over land
and ocean
Extrema: February/August
Local Land:North-South displacement over land
Extrema: December/June
Gulf of Guinea is way off!
11
RESULTS
A. LOCAL LAND
• AC of insolation;March SST⇒ AC of land precip
B. LOCAL OCEAN
• AC of SST;March Insolation⇒ AC of ocean precip
C. REMOTE LAND
• AC of SST;March Insolation⇒ AC of land precip
D. REMOTE OCEAN
• AC of land insolation;March SST⇒ AC of ocean
12
Results: LOCAL OCEAN
90W 60W 30W 0 30E
30S
15S
EQ.
15N
30N
CTL − 1st EOF of PRECIP (56%)
J F M A M J J A S O N D−1.5
−1
−0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
21st PC
CTL:North-South displacement over land
and ocean
Extrema: February/August
Local Ocean:North-South displacement over ocean
Extrema: March/August
Local control of ITCZ position
Non-local control of ITCZ intensity
What’s the role of elevated condensational heating (Qcond) in generatingsurface winds and convergence?
13
Results: LOCAL OCEAN: the role of Qcond.
Moisture Convergence (P-E) &Surface Wind Response to SSTchanges.
14
Results: LOCAL OCEAN: the role of Qcond.
Moisture Convergence (P-E) &Surface Wind Response to SSTchanges.
Moisture Convergence (P-E) &Surface Wind Response to Qcondchanges in the ITCZ. The ITCZ
Qcond drives a circulation that sustains
the original SST-induced displacement
of the ITCZ.
15
RESULTS
A. LOCAL LAND
• AC of insolation;March SST⇒ AC of land precip
B. LOCAL OCEAN
• AC of SST;March Insolation⇒ AC of ocean precip
C. REMOTE LAND
• AC of SST;March Insolation⇒ AC of land precip
D. REMOTE OCEAN
• AC of land insolation;March SST⇒ AC of ocean
16
Results: REMOTE LAND.
Precipitation response to SSTchanges.• Northeast Brazil /Guiana
• Equatorial Africa & Guinea /Sahel
17
Results: REMOTE LAND: the role of Qcond.
Precipitation response to SSTchanges.• Northeast Brazil /Guiana
• Equatorial Africa & Guinea /Sahel
Precipitation response to Qcond
changes in the ITCZ.• YES: South America
• NO: Africa
18
Results: REMOTE LAND: the role of Tsfc
300
320
340
360West Africa
____ Sept. θe _ _ _ Sept. SLP
____ March θe _ _ _ March SLP
1005
1015
1025
30S 15S EQ 15N 30N1005
1015
1025
300
320
340
360Central Africa
____ Sept. θe _ _ _ Sept. SLP
____ March θe _ _ _ March SLP
1005
1015
1025
30S 15S EQ 15N 30N1005
1015
1025
SST⇓
Land Tsfc
⇓θe and SLP
⇓Pmax position.
19
Results: REMOTE LAND: Inland Advection of SST.
+
• SST ⇒ ITCZ
• ITCZ ⇒ wind in Africa + wind
and SAT in Near East
• mean westerlies ⇒ Arabian SAT
• mean easterlies + wind anomalies
⇒ Sahara SAT︸ ︷︷ ︸
• African SLP ⇒ southerly wind
• ⇒ moisture convergence into the
Sahel 20
RESULTS
A. LOCAL LAND
• AC of insolation;March SST⇒ AC of land precip
B. LOCAL OCEAN
• AC of SST;March Insolation⇒ AC of ocean precip
C. REMOTE LAND
• AC of SST;March Insolation⇒ AC of land precip
D. REMOTE OCEAN
• AC of land insolation;March SST⇒ AC of ocean
21
Results: REMOTE OCEAN: ITCZ Intensity Change
Uncoupled response: Land climateforces rainfall intensity anomalies inthe Atlantic ITCZ.
• Does the ITCZ respond tochanges in land surface temper-ature?
• Does it respond to changes inland precipitation (Qcond)?
22
Results: REMOTE OCEAN: Response to Land Qcond
The response to imposed steady forcing in elevated condensational heatingover Africa and South America.
Uncoupled response• ITCZ intensity responds to remote
Qcond anomalies.
• Anomalies are co-located with the
mean ITCZ.
• Surface wind anomalies over ocean.
23
Results: REMOTE OCEAN: Response to Land Qcond
The response to imposed steady forcing in elevated condensational heating(Qcond) over Africa and South America.
Uncoupled response• ITCZ intensity responds to remote
Qcond anomalies.
• Anomalies are co-located with the
mean ITCZ.
• Surface wind anomalies over ocean.
Coupled response• wind anomalies ⇒ evaporation
anomalies
• latent heat flux anomalies ⇒ SST
anomalies
• anomalous SST gradient ⇒ the
ITCZ shift
• wind/evaporation/SST/ITCZ feed-
back.
24
COUPLED RESULTS
D. REMOTE OCEAN (coupled!)
CTL
• AC of Insolation over Land.
• AC of Insolation over Ocean.
• AC of Q-flux.
Fixed Insolation over Land
• March Insolation over Land.
• AC of Insolation over Ocean.
• AC of Q-flux.
︸ ︷︷ ︸⇓
Effect of AC of Insolation over Land
25
Results: REMOTE OCEAN: Central Atlantic response toAC of Insolation over Land
15S10S 5S EQ 5N10N15N
PRECIPITATIONControl
PRECIPITATIONOceanic Forcings Only
J M M J S N J M M J S N
15S10S 5S EQ 5N10N15N
SST & V
J M M J S N J M M J S N
SST & V
suppressed AC over land ⇒ suppressed
meridional annual march of ITCZ.
Concomitant changes in SST.
What forces the SST & ITCZ anomalies?
• Land surface temperature?
• Land precipitation?
26
Results: REMOTE OCEAN: Effect of Land Temperature andPrecipitation
Compare the control simulation to the simulation with fixed insolation overland and the simulation with fixed elevated condensational heating over
Africa and South America (Qcond)
15S10S 5S EQ 5N10N15N
PREC′
Land Insolation Effect
PREC′
Land Qcond
Effect
PREC′
Land Temperature Effect
J M M J S N J M M J S N
15S10S 5S EQ 5N10N15N
SST′ & V′
J M M J S N J M M J S N
SST′ & V′
J M M J S N J M M J S N
SST′ & V′
Land Qcond andland Tsfc havelarge and oppositeeffects.
Land Tsfc domi-nant.
27
How?
28
Results: REMOTE OCEAN: Development of ITCZ Anomalies inResponse to Land Forcing.
J M M J S N J M M J S N−15
−10
−5
0
5
T SA
HA
RA
Effect ofInsolation over Land
J M M J S N J M M J S N
−1
0
1
2
UN
TA
J M M J S N J M M J S N
−0.9
−0.6
−0.3
SS
T NTA
J M M J S N J M M J S N
−1
−0.5
0
0.5
∇ S
ST
J M M J S N J M M J S N
−6
−3
0
ITC
Z
December cold “anomalies” in theSahara ⇒ thermal high
⇓stronger NTA Trades ⇒ stronger
evaporation⇓
colder NTA+
feedbacks @ equator⇓
equatorial SST gradient⇓
ITCZ shift
29
Equatorial Feedbacks
30
CONCLUSIONS:Mutual Influences of Land and Ocean
31
Conclusions: REMOTE INFLUENCE OF SST ON LAND
The AC of SST influences the AC of land precipitation
in coastal areas: SST ⇒ ITCZ ⇒ Northeast Brazil and Guianaprecipitation.
in the Sahel: SST ⇒ Sahara Tsfc ⇒ SLP gradient ⇒ Sahel precipitation.
32
Conclusions: REMOTE INFLUENCE OF LAND ONOCEAN
Land climate influences the ITCZ intensity and position.
intensity: Land Qcond ⇒ free tropospheric temperature ⇒ stability overthe ocean ⇒ ITCZ intensity.
position: directly and indirectly forced wind ⇒ latent heat loss ⇒ SST ⇒ITCZ position.• Sahara Tsfc ⇒
north tropical At-lantic Trades.
• Land Qcond ⇒ equa-torial wind.
• Land Qcond ⇒ ITCZintensity ⇒ surfacewind at the edge ofthe ITCZ.
Changes in surface windtrigger coupled feedbacksamong wind, SST, andITCZ.
33
IMPLICATIONS:for models, TAV, and paleo
34
Implications: MODELING THE ANNUAL CYCLE
• CCM3 biases: reduce the overestimate of precipitation over land (by
changing albedo?) ?⇒ solve the underestimation of precipitation in theITCZ.
• CGCM biases: correct precipitation over equatorial coastal areas andSahel ⇔ correct SST.
• CGCM biases: correct march of Atlantic ITCZ ⇔ correct AC oftemperature in the Sahara and of precipitation in Africa and SouthAmerica.
35
Implications: TROPICAL ATLANTIC VARIABILITY &CLIMATE CHANGE
• SST influences land precipitation at the annual timescale in the sameway it does at the interannual timescale ⇒ the AC is indeed a usefulanalogue for TAV.
• AC of land influences AC of ocean ?⇒ continental variability influencesmaritime variability.
• Change in African climate (e.g. due to deforestation) ?⇒ NortheastBrazil (via ITCZ).
Remaining question: How does the response time of the ocean modify theresponse to continental forcing at the interannual timescale?
36
Implications: PALEO CLIMATE STUDIESe.g. the Green Sahara
• Simulation of precipitation at edge of Sahara ⇔ correct basinwideAtlantic SST boundary conditions
• Simulation of precipitation in Sahara ⇔ correct simulation of soilalbedo (soil moisture and vegetation).
• The greening of the Sahara should be visible in paleo records of theITCZ position (e.g. from the Cariaco basin). Is it?
Caveat: what’s the role of ocean dynamics?
37
THANXto parents, teachers, friends, and numerous beings who have given guidance
and support along the path.
David Battisti. Ed Sarachik. Dennis Hartmann. Mike Wallace. ChrisBretherton. Eric Steig. Class of ’96. Dan Vimont. Martin Widmann. ChrisThompson. John Chiang. Todd Mitchell. Kevin Rennert. Justin Wettstein.
Camille Li. Everybody past and present in JISAO. Fiamma Straneo.Rosalba Ciampi. Chris Flanagan. Eric Dee. Pokeys and FNBers. MaryLouGamba. Housemates. Martin Wallace. Mom & Dad and sisters and friends
back home. David, Lynn, Eric, Adrian, Nathaniel
...and more!
38