the alpha project - stepping towards predictive biology michael b. gonzales senior research fellow...
Post on 22-Dec-2015
217 views
TRANSCRIPT
The Alpha Project- Stepping Towards Predictive Biology
Michael B. GonzalesSenior Research FellowMolecular Sciences InstituteBerkeley, CA
mol
ecul
a r s
c ien
ces
ins t
itute
The Molecular Sciences Institute
• Founded in 1996 by Nobel Laureate Dr. Sydney Brenner
• Independent, non-profit research laboratory that combines genomic experimentation and computer modeling
• Core research activity - The Alpha Project
• Currently ~20 senior research fellows - molecular biology, physics, chemistry, mathematics
Magritte
Goal: To combine genomic and computational research in order to make predictive models of biological systems.
mol
ecul
a r s
c ien
ces
ins t
itute
mol
ecul
a r s
c ien
ces
ins t
itute
The Alpha Project
• Five-year, multidisciplinary research effort
• The focus of the Alpha Project is to examine extra/intra-cellular information flow and processing
• Collaborators include California Institute of Technology, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, the University of California, Berkeley, University of California, San Francisco and Pacific Northwest National Laboratory.
mol
ecul
a r s
c ien
ces
ins t
itute
Why baker’s yeast?
• S. cerevisiae mating provides a level of system description greater than that for almost any other eukaryotic process
• Alpha pheromone signal pathway is GPCR mediated and analogous to higher eukaryotes
•Yeast are highly tractable experimentally; facilitating the development of new experimental methods
• Well-suited to rapid iterative experimental cycles linking new experimentation to new computation
mol
ecul
a r s
c ien
ces
ins t
itute
a
a factor
factor
zygotea/
Sex in the lab
mol
ecul
a r s
c ien
ces
ins t
itute
Response to Pheromone
Bright field image Fluorescent image
2 hour pheromone treatmentReporter: Prm1-YFP
mol
ecul
a r s
c ien
ces
ins t
ituteSte2
Ste5
Ste11
Fus3
Ste7 MAPK Cascade
Ste12 Transcriptional Activation
G1 Arrest Morphogenesis, fusion
/GpaI /Ste4 /Ste18
Ste20
PP
PPP
The pheromone response pathway
mol
ecul
a r s
c ien
ces
ins t
itute
CreditsXimena AresKirsten BenjaminRoger BrentIan BurbulisKirindi ChoiTina ChinAlejandro Colman-LernerJay DoaneMichael B. GonzalesAndrew GordonLarry LokAndrew MendelsohnOrna ResnekovEduard SerraDavid SoergelKumiko YamaguchiRichard Yu
UCSFMatt JacobsonBrian ShoichetKevan Shokat
UC BerkeleyJulie Leary (Chem)Stuart Russell (CS)
PNNLRichard Smith (Chem)Robert Maxwell
MITDrew Endy (ex MSI)Ty Thomson (BioEng)Gerry Sussman (CS)Tom Knight (CS)
CaltechShuki Bruck (CS)
Sandia NLSteve Plimpton (P, CS)Danny Rintoul (P, CS)
In search of a Gpa1-specific inhibitor
mol
ecul
a r s
c ien
ces
ins t
itute
Gpa1 Background
• Key regulatory protein in pheromone signalling pathway
• Tethered to the plasma membrane via interaction with heptahelical receptor (GPCR)
• No crystal structure
• Several good crystallized homologs Rat ~66% ID, 45% Sim, 1.5 Angstroms
• Divergent insert aa 130-234 does not include binding site - removal has no effect on activity
mol
ecul
a r s
c ien
ces
ins t
itute
Gtpase sequence conservation in yeast
Gpa1 SpliceGpa1Gpa2
Sar1Arf3Cin4Arf2Arf1Arl1
*Arrows indicate GTP binding residues in Gpa1.
mol
ecul
a r s
c ien
ces
ins t
itute
Identifying Selective Inhibitor for Gpa1
• Evaluate sequence conservation within S. cerevisiae
• Evaluate crystal structures for homology model building
• Build/Evaluate homology model
• Dock small molecules
• Perform small molecule screen
mol
ecul
a r s
c ien
ces
ins t
itute
Gpa1 Contact Residues Conserved
mol
ecul
a r s
c ien
ces
ins t
itute
Gpa1 model based on 1CIP
Hinge
mol
ecul
a r s
c ien
ces
ins t
itute
Gpa1 models with/out cofactors
Gold = built with cofactorsAqua = built without cofactorsRMSD = 0.1079
mol
ecul
a r s
c ien
ces
ins t
itute
Gpa1 with bound GNP
mol
ecul
a r s
c ien
ces
ins t
itute
Initial screen• Screened ~500 molecules from Chembank library (thanks
Ilya)
• Used GTP, GDP, GNP, GTPS, ATP, ADP as “controls”
• Glide - standard speed/precision
• Docked into 2 Gpa1 (spliced) models based on 1CIP1) Built with Mg cofactor and GNP ligand2) Built without Mg cofactor and GNP ligand
• Docked into 1CIP
mol
ecul
a r s
c ien
ces
ins t
itute
Cofactors play critical role in ligand dock scores
Ligand +Cofactors -Cofactors
GTP 2 4
GNP 1 92
GDP 5 45
GTPS 417
ATP 3 8
ADP 9 54
mol
ecul
a r s
c ien
ces
ins t
itute
Gpa1 pocket built with/out cofactors
RMSD = 0.159
mol
ecul
a r s
c ien
ces
ins t
itute
GTP binding poses nearly identical
Mg
No cofactors
With cofactors
GTP binding poses in Gpa1 models built with/without cofactors
mol
ecul
a r s
c ien
ces
ins t
itute
Moving forward
• Evaluate the use of multiple (homology) models to enhance the rank scores *Dock into multiple representative structures *Perform simple scoring function across all ranked molecules - I.e. average score, energy, etc.
• Evaluate the impact of cofactors/ligands on homology model docking scores *Build homolgy models of protein with many known ligands (Cdk2) - build with and without cofactors/ligands *dock into several resolved crystal structures as well as homology models
mol
ecul
a r s
c ien
ces
ins t
itute
Small molecule identification - the old fashioned way
• Perform small molecule screens on S. cerevisiae in the lab
• Powerful genetic tools make assay for inhibitor molecules very straightforward
• 1000 - 5000 molecules can be screened in ~1month