the accelerator directorate the organization, priorities and accelerator r&d may 5, 2011 norbert...
TRANSCRIPT
The Accelerator Directorate The Organization, Priorities and Accelerator R&D
May 5, 2011
Norbert Holtkamp
Topics
• My first 100 days
• Organizational adjustments
• Priorities
• Where do we go with Accelerator R&D
• Long range planning
• Summary
2Accelerator R&D: Strategy
My First 100 Days…Observations
• The observations were heavily influenced by the review of AED. – Business systems + Document management systems are up to
standards– “Shadow organizations” and “Shadow systems” exist
• Systems Engineering is not consistent across AD/Lab• Significant frustration regarding Accelerator R&D.• Lack of trust towards upper management.• In spite of all that: Operation of user facilities and
construction of new ones is doing very well.
3Accelerator R&D: Strategy
A fantastic Toy: LCLS Achievements “… and then there was light”. Coherent light. Immediately.
Very short transition from commissioning to user operation
Low charge (20pC) bunches for short bunch length (<10fs)
Extended energy range, .5keV – 10keV
Second Harmonic After Burner (SHAB) for x-rays to approx. 20 keV
Operation at 120 Hz (and 120 Hz controls feedback) was seamless
Operating now at approx. 4000 hrs. per year at greater than 95% accelerator availability
Accelerator R&D: Strategy
4
The OrganizationThe Resources
Present Accelerator Directorate Organization
Norbert Holtkamp, ALD
Bob Hettel, Deputy
John Seeman, Deputy
LCLS Accelerator
Systems Division
D. Schultz
Accelerator Engineering Division
K. Fant
Accelerator Operations
& Safety Division
R. Erickson
Accelerator Research Division
T. Raubenheimer
S0-20 Accelerator Division
U. Wienands
Strategic Projects Division
J. Galayda
SPEAR3
Accelerator Division
J. Schmerge
ESH&Q
Mike Scharfenstein
Acting
Administration
H. O’Donnell
Business Office
C. Lowe
• The Accelerator Directorate has a total of ~ 600 FTE.• Approximately 275 FTE are funded directly or indirectly in
support of the LCLS.• Approximately 170 FTE are “hard” matrixed to the LCLS.
6Accelerator R&D: Strategy
Organizational Adjustments
• Is there anything wrong with the existing organization?• Observations:
– 28% of all AD employees are coded supervisors– Present org charts mix between administrative and functional
supervision– Up to seven levels of management– PAUSE event pointed out deficiencies in communication and lack of
clarity in supervision
– Dissatisfied customers– In some areas the mission and the organization are not aligned.– Some of the current structure has been in place for more than a
decade and can be rigid, cumbersome and inflexible– Rates are too high. Substantial UDT across the organization
7Accelerator R&D: Strategy
What Do We Have? - What Do We Want?
Accelerator R&D: Strategy 8
The Present Organization
Accelerator R&D: Strategy 9
The Biggest Change: Engineering Organization
• Owns more than 2/3 of AF (>400 people)
• Only 2 options:1. AED is a directorate2. AED splits up into 3
~90 ~130 ~180
Accelerator R&D: Strategy 10
Restructured Organization
Accelerator R&D: Strategy 1111
Funding Sources
WBS 1PhotonScienceSIMES INSTPULSE INSTSUNCAT INST
WBS 3SSRL ScienceBL OperationsUsersExperiments
WBS 8Accelerator Support for PPA, SSRL, LCLSOperations, Safety and MaintenanceUpgrades – AIPs, small projectsResearch and Future DevelopmentCore Competencies and TechnologiesService CentersProjects – LCLS II, LUSI, FACET, MEC (WBS 7)
WBS 9Lab-wide Support
Allocation Pools&Service CentersDirector’s OfficeCOO OfficePlanning & AssessmentFinanceProcurementHuman ResourcesESHProject Mgmt OfficeFacilitiesComputingCommunications
Infrastructure Projects(directly funded)
BES #1funds
HEP ##funds
BES #2funds
BES #3 funds
Other FundSourcesWFOAgenciesStanford
WBS 4LCLS ScienceBL OperationsUsersExperiments
WBS 2PPA ScienceKIPACElem ParticleBabar D&DService Centers
HEP ##funds
12Accelerator R&D: Strategy
Detailed Breakdown
Accelerator R&D: Strategy 13
HEP LCLS SSRL Other Grand Total
TOTAL WBS 8.0 38,765 95,688 12,335 6,721 153,510
8.02 SPEAR3 Core Team 0 0 8,629 0 8,629SPEAR3 Core Team Management 0 0 5,591 0 5,591SPEAR3 Operations and Mainten 0 0 2,264 0 2,264SPEAR3 Upgrades 0 0 773 0 773
8.03 LCLS Core Team 0 68,593 0 0 68,593LCLS Core Team Management 0 2,086 0 0 2,086LCLS Operations and Maintenanc 0 39,807 0 0 39,807LCLS Upgrades 0 26,701 0 0 26,701
8.04Sect 0 to 20 & FACET Core Team 6,938 6,015 0 0 12,953S0-20 Core Team Management 445 462 0 0 906S0-20 Operations and Maintenan 4,448 5,235 0 0 9,683S0-20 Upgrades 2,046 318 0 0 2,364
8.05Accelerator Operations & Safet 1,288 12,881 3,706 0 17,876AOS Division Office 226 696 234 0 1,157Maintenance Coord, Statistics, 0 622 0 0 622Document Control 0 449 0 0 449Beam Operations 350 4,321 1,537 0 6,208MCC Systems 0 703 0 0 703SPEAR3 Control Center Systems 0 0 20 0 20Power 712 6,090 1,915 0 8,717
8.06Accelerator Research & Develop 30,539 8,199 0 6,721 45,460ARD Division Office 107 0 0 0 107LCLS 0 6,403 0 2,242 8,645Spear3 0 0 0 205 205Test Facilities 5,599 0 0 0 5,599ILC 4,237 0 0 0 4,237LARP and LHC Upgrades 2,361 0 0 0 2,361Accelerator Design - Physics & 1,452 0 0 0 1,452RF Source & Structure Developm 8,813 0 0 1,617 10,430Novel Acceleration Research 3,666 0 0 0 3,666High Gradient Research 3,157 0 0 0 3,157Accelerator Technology Develop 648 1,796 0 239 2,683AD Work For Others 498 0 0 1,983 2,481Other Accelerator R&D 0 0 0 436 436
Long Range Planning
Accelerator R&D: Strategy 14
Ten Year View of SLAC Funding
Total in $Millions
Base - Research, Operations & Maintenance FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 FY2013 FY2014 FY2015 FY2016 FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 Outyears Total
High Energy Physics (HEP) 93 89 91 92 94 97 99 102 104 107 109
Basic Eenerty Science (BES) - SSRL 33 34 45 48 51 54 55 57 59 61 63
BES LCLS 106 123 143 157 170 185 201 217 223 228 234
BES Photon Science 18 20 23 30 36 43 52 62 75 90 107
Other - EM, Safeguard & Security, BER 10 13 14 15 16 17 19 20 21 22 23
Ttl SLAC Base 261 279 316 343 367 397 426 458 481 507 537
0 0 0
Non-Base - Projects
Science Laboratory Infrastrcutre (SLI)-Research Support Bldg (RSB) 7 41 12 36 - - - - - - - - 96
SLI-Scientific User and Support Bldg (SUSB) - - 12 33 19 1 - - - - - - 65
SLI-Photon Science Laboratory Bldg - - - - - - 5 30 25 - - - 60
BES-LCLS I & PULSE 39
BES-LCLS II 1 7 30 91 115 95 45 15 - - - - 399
BES-LCLS 2025 - - - - - - - - 5 17 40 538 600
BES-PEP X - - - - - - - - - 6 25 469 500
HEP-LSST - - 12 25 44 37 24 14 - - - - 156 BES-SSRL BL, incl Addt'l Staff Suprt - 2 5 10 11 11 13 13 9 7 7 7 93
Total NonBase Projects 47 49 71 195 189 143 87 72 39 30 72 1,014 1,969
Total SLAC - NonARRA 308 328 387 538 557 540 513 529 520 537 608 1,014 1,969
ARRA Projects 33 40 21 - - - - - - - - - 94
Total SLAC 340 368 409 538 557 540 513 529 520 537 608 1,014 2,063
Out Year Input from PPA - R. Alva; SSRL - S. Carlson; LCLS - S. Honl; Photon Sci - N. Matlin
Current Fiscal Year
DRAFT
Where are We Going: Priorities, Accelerator R&D
SLACs Lab Agenda
Mission• Grow into the premier
Photon Science Laboratory
• Maintain our position as the premier [electron] accelerator laboratory
• Build targeted programs in particle physics, particle astrophysics & cosmology
16Accelerator R&D:
Strategy
SLAC Particle Physics+Astronomy and Accelerator Research
PPA • FERMI• LSST• LHC support• EXO• LC• Super B
Accelerators• NC LC Technology• High Power RF • High Gradients • FACET• LASER Acceleration• TEST beams
17Accelerator R&D: Strategy
… the programs, facilities and infrastructure SLAC operates
Example: Maintain our Status as the Premier Electron Accelerator Laboratory
• Innovative technologies for accelerators– NC high gradient acceleration – Dielectric – Plasma – NC accelerator for DOE (and
worldwide)
FACET
• Novel approach for high brightness beams– Beam generation
– Beam/ -manipulation – Laser-Beam
manipulation/diagnostics
ECHO 4
18Accelerator R&D: Strategy
Beyond HEP: The SLAC Multi-Program Environment
PPA • Detector R&D• Computing • Data acquisition &
management
AD• Beam Dynamics• Technology
infrastructure • Test Facilities• Research on future
colliders• Computation
19Accelerator R&D: Strategy
LCLS,SSRL & Photon Science
LCLS Operations LCLS Experiments
Data acquisition
Data storage High brightness
beams Low Emittance
Beam Acceleration New light source
concepts
… the technology HEP supports at SLAC benefits the entire lab……and back
The Laboratory Mission - The Accelerator Role
Grow into the premier Photon Science Laboratory
Maintain our position as the premier [electron] accelerator laboratory
Build targeted programs in particle physics, particle astrophysics & cosmology
Seeding schemes that will change FEL designs
R&D Program @LCLS LC, Beam Manipulation
Next Generation Injectors Injector Test Infrastructure LC, Super KEKB,
Ultra short pulses Diagnostics. Timing/Synchronization
LC
User adapted applications Linac designs for specific needs
LC, MC
Enabling Technology RF Power (at any band) and new power sources
LC, MAP, Project X, everywhere
The “ultimate” storage ring Beam Dynamics and Feedback systems
Super B / Super KEK B
“Doubling the energy” Plasma Wake Field Acceleration
FACET and its experimental program
Accelerator R&D: Strategy20
Accelerator R&D: Strategy
Priorities:LCLS-II as a Part of LCLS-2025: What SLAC Envisions
present LCLSNEHHall
LCLS-2025
FEHHall
LCLS II is key step on path to LCLS 2025
soft x-ray
hard x-ray
LCLS Accompanying FEL R&D Program
Z.HuangJ.HastingsB.Hettel
Sector 0 FEL R&D Test Facility
A staged approach to a five to 15 to 30 Million$ Test Facility that serves SLAC and others (LBNL,ANL)
23Accelerator R&D: Strategy
Redirecting where: Status on the Photon Side
• The R&D plan is consistent with SLACs mission statement
• The plan includes other laboratories and serves not only SLAC but other national programs and the worldwide community
• All elements of the plan will happen depending on time and funding because they are all mission critical
• … it’s a good and complete plan, although details are missing!
Accelerator R&D: Strategy 24
Redirecting where: What about the HEP part?
• B.Brinkman (Oct 2009)• There are a number of promising emerging accelerator
technologies now under investigation with HEP support:– High-Gradient RF Structures– Muon Accelerators &Colliders– Photonic Band-Gap Structures– Superconducting Radio Frequency– Wake Fields in Plasmas or Dielectrics
Accelerator R&D: Strategy 25
Other SLAC Accelerator Research Program
• Strong programs in Advanced Accelerator concepts, High Power RF (HPRF) and Beam physics and Diagnostics– Utilize SLAC core competencies in HPRF and accelerator design– Leverage SLAC test facilities, infrastructure and computation effort
• SLAC HEP Accelerator R&D program at crossroads– World-leading accelerator research program with unique but expensive
infrastructure and test facilities
– Most near-term application industrial or scientific radiation sources– Accelerators have potential to impact community and economy
Accelerator R&D: Strategy26
B&R Description FY 2010FY 2011Feb AFP
FY 2011 Budget
KA120201 B-Factory Operations Total 12,019 8,880 9,341KA120202 B-Factory Support Total 2,930 900 4,664
B-Factory Complex Total 14,949 9,780 14,005KA1101021 Proton: Energy Frontier 4,300 3,800 4,245KA1201020 Electron 8,312 6,667 7,230KA1301021 Non-Accelerator: Cosmic Frontier 17,332 12,000 15,884KA1301022 Non-Accelerator: Intensity Frontier 3,463 1,500 1,678KA1401020 Theoretical Research 7,795 7,620 8,665
Core EPP Research 41,202 31,587 37,701KA1501020 Accelerator Science 8,659 9,534 10,617KA1502011 Accelerator Development 3,333 3,647 3,537KA1503020 Detector R&D 4,341 3,578 3,400
Core Technologies R&D 16,333 16,759 17,555Core Programs 57,535 48,346 55,256Core Programs FTEs 220
KA1301031 LSSTKA1301032 CDMS/SNO R&D 300 0 700KA1301032 LSST R&D 2,145 4,000 4,812KA1301025 EXO Operations 0 1,500 1,778KA1301025 FGST Operations 0 5,000 2,884KA1501050 FACET Operations 0 6,000 6,000
Research Projects Total 2,445 16,500 16,174KA1102053 LHC Support (LARP) 2,281 1,845 2,371KA1102054 ATLAS Operations 2,328 1,509 1,446
LHC R&D Program Total 4,609 3,354 3,817ILC R&D Total 11,766 8,257 9,257Other Total 2,479 44 2,826Projects/LHC/ILC/Other 21,299 28,155 32,074SLAC HEP Total 93,783 86,281 101,335Core Programs + EXO/ISOC Ops 57,535 59,918Core Programs + EXO/ISOC Ops FTEs 220
The Reality: FY2011 funding vs budget situation
• Where will SLAC be in 3-5 years?
• Following trend: ~ $ 6-7 M• Following trend ~ $ 3 M
• 0 unless there is a FACET II
• Following trend ~ $ 3.5 M• Depends: 0- < $ 2 M
_______________________________
That’s ~ $ 15 M versus ~ $ 31M
Accelerator R&D: Strategy 27
28
Programmatic Elements and Direction in the Future
Advanced Accelerator R&D: High Gradient, LASERs/PLASMA
FEL Physics InstrumentationHigh rep rate, ultrafast
Accelerator Computations
Pulsed PowerModulators
BEAM DynamicsHigh Power RF
Fully aligned with SLAC mission
DOE fully funds100%
Unique capability @SLAC. DOE will partially fund
Very useful for SLACLargely funded through grants
NC Linac Design & Construction
Accelerator R&D: Strategy
AD-Status Overview and Outlook
• R&D infrastructure:– HEP funded AD infrastructure is about $ 30M / y
• Probably shrink to $ 10M / y by 2015– BES funded AD infrastructure is << $ 10M / y
• could grow to $ 20M / y
• In order to maintain and grow this infrastructure AD would need a ~$30M - $40M program by 2015.
• Sources: DARPA, BES, NP, HEP, FS, DOD, Industry, NIH• AD is approx $ 150M/y now and will be in 2015/2016 because
LCLS II construction money. Without WFO AD can not grow/maintain.
• Management decision: not more than 20% of the AD base!
29Accelerator R&D: Strategy
Other Sources of Funding- is it a Solution?
• WFO funding can support infrastructure and technology that can not be full covered by funding through base/core programs.
• SLAC has technology, infrastructure and intellectual capabilities that can benefit industries, other agencies and the nation.
• Risks:– Fluctuations in funding can not be covered by Laboratory Base
budget– Effort becomes very scattered without clear direction and alignment
with lab core mission– AD can’t raise the ~$ 35M /y and AD infrastructure will fade away– WFO becomes substantial part of base budget and threatens lab
core missions through shift in priority
Accelerator R&D: Strategy 30
WFO: Is It Realistic?Lab Topic Time
FundingScale
FundingRisk
CERN Ongoing structure fabrication & testing 2010-11 ~300k None
LLNL First phase of MEGa-ray construction 2010-11 ~750k None
FNAL Project-X rf system development 2011 ~400k None
LANL Design studies for MARIE 2011 ~300k Low
LCLS SLED pulse compressor upgrade 2011-12 ~600k Low
LLNL Complete MEGa-ray 250 MeV linac 2011-12 ~1600k Low
LLNL Joint LLNL/SLAC DARPA AxIS Prop. 2011-14 ~7200k Med
CERN Additional CLIC structure testing at SLAC 2012-13 ~800k Med
CERN Three additional klystron-based test stands (SATS) 2012-14 ~2200k# Low
LANL R&D for MARIE on high grad. long-pulse linacs 2012-14 ~5000k High
LCLS X-band deflector (klystron, waveguide, …) 2013 ~800k Med
LCLS-II Bunch compressor linearizer 2013 ~800k Low
LCLS Energy dither (600 MeV w/ 4 XL4’s & 16 struct.) 2014-15 ~5400k High
ELI-NP High gradient 600 MeV linac for gamma ICS 2014-16 ~8000k# Med
PSI Energy dither / energy upgrade (0.4 ~ 2 GeV) 2016 ~10M$ per GeV# High
# = funding may be split between SLAC and industry
~500k additional internal SLAC LDRD funding in FY1131Accelerator R&D: Strategy
WFO by Directorate at SLAC Today *
Directorate
Photon science $ 826
Particle & Astro $1,096
SSRL $5,961
LCLS $105
Operations $1,729
Accelerator $3,434
AD-BES $1.901
Adv Sci Comp $132
$13,151
32Accelerator R&D: Strategy
We intend to grow this to > $ 22M in FY12 !!!
More recent initiatives – We will do!
• The Muons: Engage in MAP-Berkeley and SLAC will make a proposal together. Approx 6 FTEs each.
• Plan for FACET II• Maintain the Linear Collider (at SLAC or elsewhere)
• Engage with HP RF industry • Start WFO others program (and infrastructure)
• Be the center for normal conducting RF accelerators and especially linacs, HP RF sources and pulsed power
Accelerator R&D: Strategy 33
Budget Realities
• SLAC operates the only hard x-ray laser for another couple of years.
• There a core competencies that SLAC wants to maintain and that the DOE wants to maintain within the complex
• There are new projects and opportunities for the Accelerator directorate:– LCLS II, ITF, FEL R&D programs, NGLS participation…– Develop, implement and execute a healthy Work For Others
program– Look for the future of HEP: SUPER B, LHC, Linear Collider, Muon
Collider… but better be patient!
34Accelerator R&D:
Strategy
Summary
• The largest part of the Accelerator Directorate is very straightforward although challenging to maintain and to improve
• The Accelerator Research and Development is facing a major shift and we need to calibrate ourselves whether:– The path makes sense– The path is realistic– The path allows address to the full breath of opportunities
• There will be a series of talks addressing the elements of the plan
Accelerator R&D: Strategy 35
Flat Organizations …
• Tuned for matrix organizations
• Reduces the number of layers “above” – We will go from ~>20% supervisors to ~ 6%
Þ Empowers employeesÞ reduces layers through which to filter messages thus
improves communicationÞ Reduces costs to the organization (= efficiencies)Þ Encourages accountabilityÞ Enhances creativity and productivity through empowerment
Accelerator R&D: Strategy 36
Administrative Supervisor vs. Functional Lead
Functional Lead Role• Under the direction of the
supervisor:• Not a Position, but a Role
– Plan and assign work– Provide coaching and guidance on
performance of job duties – may be Subject Matter Expert
– Communicates and monitors compliance with policy, procedure and protocol
– Provides performance feedback to supervisor
– Executes WPC
• Does not replace BU leads
Administrative Supervisor• Makes all personnel actions
– Hires– Evaluates– Promotes– Transfers– Terminates
• Compensation decisions• Administers corrective action• Writes and delivers performance
evaluation• Responsible for WPC
Accelerator R&D: Strategy 37
“You Can’t Manage What You Don’t Measure”
Possible Metrics for AD
• Customer Satisfaction• Cost (overhead, UDT)• Turn-around time (determine baseline)• Quality of output (reliability and availability of
systems post installation and operation)• Long term safety performance• System function and performance vs customer
requirements
Accelerator R&D: Strategy 38
Living in the Matrix: An example
Accelerator R&D: Strategy 39
Functional Authority
Administrative Authority
FEL Accelerator R&D Test Facilities – One IdeaT. Raubenheimer
Cathode Test Facility/ASTA (low E)
Photocathode R&D aimed atunderstanding LCLS lifetime
and damage issuesTest rf gun modifications before
installation in LCLS-I or II
Longer term R&D aimedat high brightness cathodes
with lower thermal e (coatings, smoothness,
new materials)
Injector R&D ProgramNLCTA Facility (<~250 MeV)Simulation and experimentalprogram aimed at significantimprovement in brightness; low-E seeding; technology
and ultrafast technique development
1) Design studies on rfgun design, CSR micro-bunching and cathodes
2) Rf gun development andtesting at NLCTA in 2012
3) NLCTA R&D on injectorbeam physics
LCLS-II Injector(135 MeV)
Full injector configuration; opportunity for R&D
before LCLS-II turn-on
Early construction, commissioning in ~2013/14 to study injector physics before LCLS-II operation
Combined HB program requires ~3M/yr
new funding
Three parallel experimental efforts:
Core Capabilities and how they map onto the Mission
Accelerator R&D: Strategy
Advanced Accelerator R&D LASERs/PLASMA
FEL Physics InstrumentationHigh rep rate, ultrafast
Computer Aided Design
Pulsed PowerModulators
BEAM DynamicsHigh Power RF
Fully aligned with SLAC mission
DOE fully funds100%
Unique capability @SLAC. DOE will partially fund
Very useful for SLACLargely funded through grants
NC Linac Design & construction
42
Accelerator R&D: Strategy
Presented at GAD Review Jan 2011:Scenario C ++
FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13
GAD Funding 11,232 4,052 3,333 3,538
LHC Accelerator Research 1,130 961 142 303 330
INFN Super-B design 538 650 44
Super – B 687 350
X-band Klystron Development 359 605 1,806 1,000 500
Power Source technology 1,100 1,900
X-band rf technology 487 473 1,022 800 400
Normal Conducting RF 800 1,200
High Performance rf modeling 294 369 316 385 420
End Station Test Beam design 327 392 0 0 0
FACET design 780 0 0 0 0
FACET II 150 700
CLIC R&D 560 549 78 0 0
Project-X collaboration 65 63 0 0 0
Feedback and LLRF program 348 224 136 192 210
Spending Totals 9,646 4,888 4,286 3,544 5,417 6,010
Will it ever happen and even if, is it sufficient to support the base without a mayor
construction program??
43
HEP Accelerator R&D Priorities at SLAC
• Advanced accelerator R&D with potential for major impact– Plasma Wakefield program although $6M FACET operations
support will limit the user program severely– Dielectric laser acceleration and NLCTA programs– SLAC needs strong leadership and vision!!!
• Beam dynamics core capability and computing mostly supported externally already
• High gradient and X-band programs– Unique capability world-wide but applications unclear
• Must define approach to normal-conducting linacs– Ongoing High Power RF (HPRF) program
• Possibly redirect High Gradient program toward power sources– Continued collaborations with LLNL, LANL and CERN
Accelerator R&D: Strategy 45