the 3 rd meeting of parallel/coordinated audit on disaster preparedness

The 3 rd Meeting of Parallel/Coordinated Audit on Disaster Preparedness

Preparedness

Parallel/coordinated audit on disaster preparedness, 3rd Meeting in İstanbul, 07-08 February 2013

Towards

Joint Report!..

Kick-off Meeting1st Meeting in Antalya, 25 October 2011

Scope of the parallel audit

Audit types/audit perspective

How to design study

Preliminary Schedule

Next steps


First Steps

Obtain background knowledge and information needed

to understand the entity to be audited, to allow on assessment of the problem and risk to plan the study to specify staffing requirements to determine the study timetable

Prepare the study proposal.Plan the studyDetermine audit objectives and methodologyFormulate the audit criteria.


Discussion Topics in the 2st Meeting in Ankara, 25-26 April 2012

How should this Parallel Audit be

Conducted?

In what form and to what extent should

the participating SAIs share

information?

In what form should the audit results be

documented?Parallel/coordinated audit on disaster preparedness, 3rd Meeting in İstanbul, 07-08 February 2013

Survey Structure

Part A: Audit Design

Part B: Parallel Audit Results

Part C: The Draft Guidelines for Auditing Disaster Preparedness

Part D: Cooperation among SAIs

Part E: Next Steps of Parallel Audit

Part F: Closure


Content for Joint Reports Preamble Introduction/ Background Scope and objectives of parallel audit Participating SAIs event analysis and risk assessment (types of disaster; Disaster information system etc.) Common audit methodology

Summary Part I Joint conclusions and recommendations/ Different Examples Part II Comparative analysis and assessment of auditing of participating SAIs. Specification of policy gabs and legal arrangement related to disaster preparedness Assessment of governance structure based upon organization& coordination structure Evaluation of national strategies, national and local planning. Usage and evaluation of management tools such as GIS, GPRS, GPS, early warning systems Evaluation of training activities and public awareness campaigns Analysis of financial structure concerning disaster preparedness Assessment of projects & programs for making urban area resilient

Part III Summary of National audits on disaster preparedness. (Objectives and scope of the audit, common criteria, risks to VFM, key findings of the audit, good practice examples)

Part IV Lesson learned for SAIs

Improving International and Regional Collaboration to Struggle against disaster Importance of International and Regional Collaboration The Need for the International and Regional Initiatives Development Enhancing the Efficiency of the SAIs (Monitoring and supervision)

Introduction/ Background

Scope and objectives of the parallel audit Participating SAIs Identification of the characteristics of the

disaster in the countries of participating SAIs.Q.5 : Please give information about the characteristics of the

disaster such as event analysis and risk assessment in your country by taking into consideration the ISSAI 5510 part 3, p.13.4 and 13.5. It would be better to support information with statistics and graphics.

Common points of audit methodology


Introduction/ Background Common Audit Methodology

Data and document analysis Interview Questionnaire Analysis plans and budget, etc. Observation / physical examination / site

visit Confirmation (oral and written) Verification list


Audit Questions& Criteria

Common Questions& CriteriaAzerbaijan, Chile, India(+), Indonesia (+/-),

Pakistan, Romania (flood), Romania

(earthquake+/-), Turkey Different Questions & CriteriaPhilippines, Ukraine

Lack of informationNetherland (+/-?)


Part I: Joint Findings/ Conclusions and Recommendations

SAIs Findings/Conclusions Recommendations

Azerbaijan formulation (?) -

Chile comparable comparable

India - -

Indonesia Different example (not whole text ?)

Different example

Netherland - -

Pakistan comparable comparable

Philippines Different example Different example

Romania (Flood) comparable comparable

Romania (Earthquake) (mostly) comparable (mostly) comparable

Turkey comparable comparable

Ukraine Different example Different example


Part II: Comparative Analysis and Assessment of Participating SAIs’

Audits Specification of policy gabs and legal arrangement related to

disaster preparedness Assessment of governance structure based upon

organization& coordination structure Evaluation of national strategies, national and local planning. Usage and evaluation of management tools such as GIS,

GPRS, GPS, early warning systems Evaluation of training activities and public awareness

campaigns Assessment of financial structure concerning disaster

preparedness Assessment of projects & programs for making urban area

resilientParallel/coordinated audit on disaster preparedness, 3rd Meeting in İstanbul, 07-08 February 2013

Concerning Legal Framework

When disaster law was published, Whether the law is satisfactory in terms of

effective management and coordination of disaster preparedness activities,

Which aspects of the legislation is deficient/missing,

Which kind of activities related to disaster preparedness are left outside the scope of this law

Specification of policy gabs etc. Parallel/coordinated audit on disaster preparedness, 3rd Meeting in İstanbul, 07-08 February 2013

Part III: Summary of National Audits on Disaster Preparedness

Scope and objectives of the audit,Criteria, Risks to VFM, Key findings/ conclusions Good practice examplesOther issues which SAI wants to

emphasise Parallel/coordinated audit on disaster preparedness, 3rd Meeting in İstanbul, 07-08 February 2013

Part IV: Lesson learned for SAIs

Improving international and regional collaboration to struggle against disaster

Importance of international and regional collaboration

The need for the development of international and regional initiatives

Enhancing the efficiency of the SAIs (Monitoring and supervision)

Other issues which participating SAIs want to emphasise


The Schedule for the Parallel/Coordinated Audit

October 2011 Kick-off meeting in October 2011

Preparing the audit proposal

April 2012 The 2nd meeting of parallel audit

common question & criteria

February 2013 The 3rd meeting of parallel audit

the individual SAIs’ audit results to TCA

25 th February 2013 Sending of lack of information to TCA

May 2013 Preparing the draft joint of report

Adaptation of the Exposure ISSAI 5510

July 2013 Sending the draft joint report to participating SAIs

November 2013 Finalizing the joint report and approval


Thank you

Arife COŞKUNTurkish Court of Accounts (TCA)e-mail: [email protected]

Tel: +90 312 295 37 01


the 3 rd meeting of parallel/coordinated audit on disaster preparedness

Documents