texas southern university faculty evaluation of the

1 of 77

Texas Southern University Faculty Evaluation of the President, Provost and

the Associate Provost

1. Please check your position in the unit (optional).

Response

Percent

Response

Count

Professor 19.6% 35

Associate Professor 17.3% 31

Assistant Professor 14.5% 26

Instructor 6.7% 12

Staff 41.9% 75

answered question 179

skipped question 26

2 of 77

2. Administrations Relationship with Employees

President

Poor Fair Good Very Good Excellent

No sufficient

information

provided

Response

Count

How available are Administrators to

employees at Texas Southern

University?30.2% (60) 20.1% (40) 18.6% (37) 7.5% (15) 11.6% (23) 12.1% (24) 199

How understanding is

Administration of faculty concerns

at Texas Southern University?33.8% (67) 17.2% (34) 17.7% (35) 10.6% (21) 9.1% (18) 11.6% (23) 198

How effective is the training,

mentoring and expectations you

receive from the Administrators of

Texas Southern University?

31.3% (62) 19.2% (38) 16.2% (32) 11.1% (22) 8.1% (16) 14.1% (28) 198

How realistic are the expectations

of the Administrators at Texas

Southern University?32.3% (64) 23.7% (47) 19.7% (39) 11.1% (22) 7.6% (15) 5.6% (11) 198

Provost


No sufficient

information

provided

Response

Count



University?23.2% (46) 20.7% (41) 20.2% (40) 11.1% (22) 15.7% (31) 9.1% (18) 198


Administration of faculty concerns 27.3% (54) 23.2% (46) 15.7% (31) 13.1% (26) 11.1% (22) 9.6% (19) 198

3 of 77

at Texas Southern University?





27.3% (54) 22.2% (44) 16.2% (32) 11.1% (22) 11.6% (23) 11.6% (23) 198




Associate Provost


No sufficient

information

provided

Response

Count



University?21.2% (42) 18.2% (36) 19.2% (38) 10.6% (21) 13.6% (27) 17.2% (34) 198


Administration of faculty concerns

at Texas Southern University?25.9% (51) 19.3% (38) 14.7% (29) 11.7% (23) 11.2% (22) 17.3% (34) 197





26.4% (52) 21.8% (43) 15.2% (30) 9.6% (19) 8.6% (17) 18.3% (36) 197





skipped question 2

4 of 77

3. Responsiveness to Employees

President


No sufficient

information

provided

Response

Count

How well do Administrators of

Texas Southern University respond

to employees' mistakes?30.7% (61) 22.1% (44) 12.1% (24) 4.5% (9) 7.0% (14) 23.6% (47) 199

How often do the Administrators of

Texas Southern University give

you feedback about your work?38.6% (76) 16.8% (33) 11.7% (23) 7.1% (14) 7.6% (15) 18.3% (36) 197

How helpful is the feedback TSU

Administrators give to employees?37.0% (71) 15.1% (29) 12.5% (24) 8.9% (17) 8.3% (16) 18.2% (35) 192

How often do Administrators of

Texas Southern University listen to

employees' opinions when making a

decision?

44.7% (85) 14.7% (28) 16.3% (31) 5.3% (10) 6.8% (13) 12.1% (23) 190

Provost


No sufficient

information

provided

Response

Count



to employees' mistakes?28.5% (57) 22.0% (44) 12.5% (25) 8.0% (16) 7.0% (14) 22.0% (44) 200


Texas Southern University give 32.7% (64) 20.9% (41) 13.8% (27) 5.1% (10) 11.7% (23) 15.8% (31) 196

5 of 77

you feedback about your work?






decision?

37.9% (72) 17.9% (34) 14.7% (28) 10.0% (19) 7.4% (14) 12.1% (23) 190

Associate Provost


No sufficient

information

provided

Response

Count



to employees' mistakes?

25.4% (50) 18.8% (37) 13.7% (27) 5.6% (11) 6.6% (13) 29.9% (59) 197


Texas Southern University give

you feedback about your work?29.3% (58) 17.2% (34) 14.1% (28) 5.6% (11) 10.1% (20) 23.7% (47) 198






decision?

33.2% (63) 16.3% (31) 14.7% (28) 8.9% (17) 7.9% (15) 18.9% (36) 190


skipped question 3

6 of 77

4. Management & Assessment of Advisement

President


No sufficient

information

provided

Response

Count

Recruitment, Retention &

Graduation29.9% (56) 20.9% (39) 21.9% (41) 10.7% (20) 10.2% (19) 6.4% (12) 187

Faculty Recognition 21.2% (39) 21.7% (40) 20.7% (38) 15.8% (29) 13.6% (25) 7.1% (13) 184

Faculty Development 23.1% (42) 25.3% (46) 19.8% (36) 9.3% (17) 9.9% (18) 12.6% (23) 182

Fostering Relationships Among

Faculty, Students, Staff and

University Supporters36.2% (68) 20.7% (39) 16.5% (31) 8.0% (15) 11.7% (22) 6.9% (13) 188

Leadership and Assessment in

Community Engagements22.3% (42) 20.2% (38) 14.4% (27) 14.4% (27) 14.9% (28) 13.8% (26) 188

Provost


No sufficient

information

provided

Response

Count


Graduation25.7% (49) 25.1% (48) 22.5% (43) 11.5% (22) 7.9% (15) 7.3% (14) 191




7 of 77





Associate Provost


No sufficient

information

provided

Response

Count


Graduation27.5% (52) 20.6% (39) 18.0% (34) 10.6% (20) 5.8% (11) 17.5% (33) 189









skipped question 8

8 of 77

5. What are the strengths (if any) of the Administrators?

Response

Percent

Response

Count

President

92.3% 120

Provost

85.4% 111

Associate Provost

81.5% 106


skipped question 75

6. What are the weaknesses (if any) of the Administrators?

Response

Percent

Response

Count

President

95.4% 124

Provost

88.5% 115

Associate Provost

75.4% 98


skipped question 75

9 of 77

7. What specific recommendations (if any) do you have to improve the performance of the Administrators?

Response

Percent

Response

Count

President

95.7% 112

Provost

92.3% 108

Associate Provost

82.1% 96


skipped question 88

8. How would you rate the Administrators in terms of overall effectiveness?

Poor Fair Good Very Good ExcellentRating

Average

Response

Count

President 23.9% (47) 25.9% (51) 20.3% (40) 16.8% (33) 13.2% (26) 2.70 197

Provost 25.8% (50) 27.8% (54) 21.6% (42) 10.8% (21) 13.9% (27) 2.59 194

Associate Provost 27.3% (51) 28.3% (53) 20.9% (39) 11.2% (21) 12.3% (23) 2.53 187


skipped question 6

10 of 77

9. How would you indicate your level of enthusiasm for the continuance/reappointment of the Administrators?

Poor Fair Good Very Good ExcellentRating

Average

Response

Count

President 31.5% (62) 20.8% (41) 17.3% (34) 13.7% (27) 16.8% (33) 2.63 197

Provost 29.4% (57) 24.2% (47) 19.6% (38) 10.8% (21) 16.0% (31) 2.60 194

Associate Provost 30.3% (57) 25.5% (48) 17.6% (33) 12.8% (24) 13.8% (26) 2.54 188


skipped question 6

10. Additionl comments/suggestions.

Response

Count

71


skipped question 134

11 of 77

12 of 77

Q5. What are the strengths (if any) of the Administrators?

President

1 Excellent administrator and visionary Apr 27, 2012 5:59 PM

2 good Apr 27, 2012 2:12 PM

3 Can be better but he listens Apr 27, 2012 12:49 PM

4 Financial acumen very sound, forceful and has a vision and could be a great president if he were open to input fromothers.

Apr 27, 2012 11:59 AM

5 community outreach Apr 27, 2012 11:49 AM

6 Fiscal management Apr 27, 2012 11:26 AM

7 Decisiveness, Foresight and Planning Apr 27, 2012 11:22 AM

8 Communication Apr 27, 2012 11:10 AM

9 Up beat attitude Apr 27, 2012 11:10 AM

10 Does a good job of publicizing happenings at the University Apr 27, 2012 11:02 AM

11 Financial oversight, management skills Apr 26, 2012 5:04 PM

12 Visionary Apr 26, 2012 3:02 PM

13 na Apr 26, 2012 2:40 PM

14 NONE Apr 26, 2012 12:01 PM

15 Leadership in campus renovation and beautification Apr 26, 2012 10:51 AM

18 dedication and perseverance nature Apr 25, 2012 5:47 PM

20 Business and Vision for the University Apr 25, 2012 4:49 PM

21 Good ideas; Good goals; good vision Apr 25, 2012 4:04 PM

13 of 77


22 Finance Apr 25, 2012 3:59 PM

23 None Apr 25, 2012 3:27 PM

24 Great Communicator Apr 25, 2012 3:02 PM

25 FISCAL QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE Apr 25, 2012 2:59 PM

26 He is working on correcting many layers of problem areas. Apr 25, 2012 2:36 PM

27 Personable Apr 25, 2012 2:09 PM

28 Persistence to overcome negative past Apr 25, 2012 2:00 PM

29 Approachable, a visionary and cordial at times. Apr 25, 2012 1:55 PM

30 Visable; willing to listen Apr 25, 2012 1:47 PM

31 Fiscal Management Apr 25, 2012 9:31 AM

32 Improving the exterior of the campus Apr 24, 2012 10:45 AM

34 He seems to be concerned about the image the students have of him Apr 23, 2012 5:51 PM

35 He enjoys seeing students succeed. Apr 23, 2012 4:54 PM

36 apparent strong concern about improving adjustment and performance of incoming (first-year) students Apr 23, 2012 3:12 PM

37 I believe the President has a vision for the University. Apr 23, 2012 2:37 PM

38 Blind eye to Provost Apr 23, 2012 2:19 PM

39 He is the President Apr 23, 2012 2:09 PM

41 None Apr 23, 2012 1:51 PM

42 Desires change and student friendly. Apr 23, 2012 11:08 AM

14 of 77


43 Commonsensical Approach Apr 23, 2012 10:18 AM

44 none Apr 23, 2012 8:11 AM

45 Focus on the physical assets of the campus- Apr 22, 2012 4:02 PM

46 strong leader, bulldozer Apr 22, 2012 3:27 PM

47 Re-nogatiating the loans Apr 22, 2012 9:46 AM

49 Community relations Apr 20, 2012 5:29 PM

50 Budgets Apr 20, 2012 4:51 PM

51 None Apr 20, 2012 4:34 PM

52 Strives to overcome TSU's negative image Apr 20, 2012 3:16 PM

53 Calculated, Analytical, Unambiguous Apr 20, 2012 3:08 PM

54 Accounting ability Apr 20, 2012 3:03 PM

55 campus beautification Apr 20, 2012 2:42 PM

56 n/a Apr 20, 2012 2:33 PM

57 Goal oriented visions and standards of excellance Apr 20, 2012 2:18 PM

58 actively involed in improving university though the approach may be not the best Apr 20, 2012 12:51 PM

59 being a bully Apr 20, 2012 11:25 AM

61 building new academic programs Apr 19, 2012 3:56 PM

62 The President accomplishes well defined goals for TSU. Apr 19, 2012 1:27 PM

63 Business Apr 19, 2012 7:31 AM

15 of 77


64 Decisive, but being decisive without complete information is problematic Apr 18, 2012 5:25 PM

65 bean counter Apr 18, 2012 3:17 PM

66 Outreach in the community Apr 18, 2012 3:02 PM

67 N/A Apr 18, 2012 11:17 AM

68 Visionary Apr 18, 2012 11:08 AM

69 initiative a good thing but adding too many academic programs Apr 18, 2012 10:24 AM

70 approachable visionary Apr 18, 2012 9:48 AM

71 Committed to improving academics, graduation rate for TSU Apr 18, 2012 9:29 AM

72 Seems fiscally good. Apr 17, 2012 9:57 PM

73 Caring, Friendly, Approachable, Set High Expectations and Achieves all goals Apr 17, 2012 4:34 PM

74 Improving the reputation of TSU Apr 17, 2012 4:16 PM

75 Implements new ideas and good organizer Apr 17, 2012 3:06 PM

77 Trying to bring some changes Apr 17, 2012 10:56 AM

78 None Apr 16, 2012 5:21 PM

79 Approachable Apr 16, 2012 4:08 PM

80 Developed and Stated a Clear Vision and Direction Apr 16, 2012 3:49 PM

81 fiscal management Apr 16, 2012 2:56 PM

82 n/a Apr 16, 2012 2:25 PM

83 Community Relations Apr 16, 2012 2:09 PM

16 of 77


84 External Issues Apr 16, 2012 2:08 PM

85 Personable Apr 16, 2012 1:45 PM

86 moving the University forward Apr 16, 2012 1:36 PM

87 None Apr 16, 2012 1:36 PM

88 none Apr 16, 2012 1:08 PM

89 Focus, fiscal acumen, experience Apr 16, 2012 1:03 PM

90 Accounting background Apr 16, 2012 12:22 PM

91 Fiscal Responsibility and Accountability/Campus Aesthetics Apr 16, 2012 12:21 PM

92 Strong goal oriented Apr 16, 2012 12:11 PM

93 Face-lifting TSU's infastructure Apr 16, 2012 12:07 PM

94 In touch with the campus financial, students, and facility needs Apr 16, 2012 12:00 PM

95 Passion Apr 16, 2012 11:43 AM

96 OK at the financial side of the univeristy Apr 16, 2012 11:29 AM

97 NONE Apr 16, 2012 11:17 AM

98 Focus on student progression Apr 16, 2012 10:54 AM

99 listening to students Apr 16, 2012 10:12 AM

100 Visionary willing to take the difficult steps toward excellence Apr 16, 2012 10:02 AM

101 Building the University to a First Class Instutiton Apr 16, 2012 9:13 AM

102 None Apr 15, 2012 10:02 PM

17 of 77


104 TSU's survival is indebted to President Rudley's genius in balancing overdrawn accounts and his courage in staunchlyarguing TSU's case to State representatives and federal accreditation agencies.

Apr 14, 2012 7:31 PM

105 None, Apr 14, 2012 7:26 PM

106 He is not accessible to Faculty. Apr 14, 2012 7:17 PM

107 He beautified the Campus Apr 14, 2012 6:07 PM

108 Intent on Improving TSU; looks to bottom line Apr 14, 2012 3:08 PM

109 His community relationship Apr 14, 2012 1:26 PM

110 Fiscal knowledge Apr 14, 2012 12:01 AM

111 Finance Apr 13, 2012 10:06 PM

112 None Apr 13, 2012 8:48 PM

113 Focused on improving the university overall Apr 13, 2012 5:19 PM

114 see #10 Apr 13, 2012 4:08 PM

115 He wants to make positive impact Apr 13, 2012 3:50 PM

116 Very business oriented and detailed Apr 13, 2012 3:32 PM

117 concern for image of university Apr 13, 2012 3:19 PM

118 GOOD Apr 13, 2012 3:15 PM

119 Fiscal responsibility, trustworthyness Apr 13, 2012 3:08 PM

120 I like the fact that the President has changed the admissions standards. I also like the new UAV. Apr 13, 2012 3:03 PM

121 leadership-fiscal responsiblity Apr 13, 2012 3:02 PM

122 Hard working and diligent; future thinking Apr 13, 2012 2:40 PM

18 of 77


123 Goals are appropriate Apr 13, 2012 2:12 PM

124 improving finances of the university Apr 13, 2012 2:12 PM

125 Campus improvements Apr 13, 2012 2:08 PM

126 Effective and Knowlegeable leader Apr 13, 2012 1:45 PM

127 Desire for excellence Apr 13, 2012 1:31 PM

128 visible and accessible, with great leadership skills Apr 13, 2012 1:30 PM

129 good effort at keeping us informed Apr 13, 2012 1:28 PM

Provost

1 works hard Apr 27, 2012 5:59 PM

2 good Apr 27, 2012 2:12 PM

3 Not too well Apr 27, 2012 12:49 PM

4 Knowledgeable Apr 27, 2012 11:59 AM

5 promoting faculty relationship Apr 27, 2012 11:49 AM

6 Visioning Apr 27, 2012 11:26 AM

7 Constituent Input, Delegating with Authority, Clarity of Purpose, Academic Visionary, Creativity of Solutions Apr 27, 2012 11:22 AM


9 Good Listner Apr 27, 2012 11:10 AM

11 Human relations, student- centered Apr 26, 2012 5:04 PM

12 Leadership Apr 26, 2012 3:02 PM

19 of 77


13 na Apr 26, 2012 2:40 PM

14 NONE Apr 26, 2012 12:01 PM

15 Do not know. Apr 26, 2012 10:51 AM

16 Congenial, friendly, intelligent Apr 26, 2012 8:41 AM

17 absolutely NONE Apr 25, 2012 6:31 PM

18 diverse expertise, leadership, collaborative and managerial skills Apr 25, 2012 5:47 PM

20 n/a Apr 25, 2012 4:49 PM

21 good attitude; good goals & vision Apr 25, 2012 4:04 PM

22 No leadership experience Apr 25, 2012 3:59 PM

23 None Apr 25, 2012 3:27 PM

24 Great Facilitator, Communicator and Motivator Apr 25, 2012 3:02 PM

25 ACADEMIC QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE Apr 25, 2012 2:59 PM

26 He is working to move the University to higher standards. Apr 25, 2012 2:36 PM

27 Have not seen any Apr 25, 2012 2:09 PM

28 Dedication to research development Apr 25, 2012 2:00 PM

29 none Apr 25, 2012 1:55 PM

30 Available and willing to listen Apr 25, 2012 1:47 PM

31 Unknown Apr 25, 2012 9:31 AM

32 no comment Apr 24, 2012 10:45 AM

20 of 77


35 N/A Apr 23, 2012 4:54 PM

36 same as above Apr 23, 2012 3:12 PM

39 He follows the President's Leadership Apr 23, 2012 2:09 PM

40 Clear expectations and follow-up Apr 23, 2012 2:05 PM

41 Innovative Apr 23, 2012 1:51 PM

42 Functions and governs himself as a true leader. Team player, accountable, great character and integrity. Apr 23, 2012 11:08 AM

43 Excellent work ethic Apr 23, 2012 10:18 AM

44 none Apr 23, 2012 8:11 AM

45 Focus on changing leadership-in each school- Apr 22, 2012 4:02 PM

46 none Apr 22, 2012 3:27 PM

47 concern for students Apr 22, 2012 9:46 AM

49 understands importance of research Apr 20, 2012 5:29 PM

51 None Apr 20, 2012 4:34 PM

52 Promotes excellence in achievement Apr 20, 2012 3:16 PM

53 Confident Apr 20, 2012 3:08 PM

54 Willingness to Listen Apr 20, 2012 3:03 PM

55 faculty relationsfaculty relations Apr 20, 2012 2:42 PM

56 n/a Apr 20, 2012 2:33 PM

57 Dedicated to improving academic excellance Apr 20, 2012 2:18 PM

21 of 77


58 Basically follows th president Apr 20, 2012 12:51 PM

59 being a bully and no independant thought Apr 20, 2012 11:25 AM

61 building new academic programs Apr 19, 2012 3:56 PM

62 The Provost has helped research with hiring grant writers, etc. Apr 19, 2012 1:27 PM

64 none observed Apr 18, 2012 5:25 PM

65 follow the bean counter instructions regardless of logic or illogic Apr 18, 2012 3:17 PM

66 Not sure Apr 18, 2012 3:02 PM

67 Smart guy (sometimes) Apr 18, 2012 11:17 AM

69 initiative but don't listen to those in chage the areas Apr 18, 2012 10:24 AM

70 approachable visionary Apr 18, 2012 9:48 AM

71 Extremely hard working Apr 18, 2012 9:29 AM

72 Seems systematic in his approach. Apr 17, 2012 9:57 PM

73 Very Busy Apr 17, 2012 4:34 PM

75 Sends out memo's Apr 17, 2012 3:06 PM

76 has common sense Apr 17, 2012 1:02 PM

77 When he acts like an academic then he is fine Apr 17, 2012 10:56 AM

78 None Apr 16, 2012 5:21 PM

79 Very visible and approachable Apr 16, 2012 4:08 PM

80 Uses Benchmarking to heighten University and set standards Apr 16, 2012 3:49 PM

22 of 77


81 understands faculty issues Apr 16, 2012 2:56 PM

82 n/a Apr 16, 2012 2:25 PM

83 None Apr 16, 2012 2:09 PM

84 Concerned about academics Apr 16, 2012 2:08 PM

85 Amiable Apr 16, 2012 1:45 PM

87 None Apr 16, 2012 1:36 PM

88 none Apr 16, 2012 1:08 PM

89 Achiever, learner Apr 16, 2012 1:03 PM

90 Research background Apr 16, 2012 12:22 PM

91 Research Emphasis/Grantsmanship/Peer-reviewed Publications Apr 16, 2012 12:21 PM

92 Authoritarian approah Apr 16, 2012 12:11 PM

93 Not aware of any Apr 16, 2012 12:07 PM

94 In touch with students needs academically Apr 16, 2012 12:00 PM

95 Knows what he wants Apr 16, 2012 11:43 AM

96 Does understand research but is constrained by the president on what he can do Apr 16, 2012 11:29 AM

97 NONE Apr 16, 2012 11:17 AM

98 Focus on academic issues Apr 16, 2012 10:54 AM

99 listening to the president Apr 16, 2012 10:12 AM

100 Understands the importance of quality instructors Apr 16, 2012 10:02 AM

23 of 77


102 Interpersonal skills and understading of academics Apr 15, 2012 10:02 PM

104 Provost Ohia is a tireless, energetic, brilliant, and, I believe, idealistic administrator who honestly seeks to engage,understand and respond to faculty needs and concerns, in the overall scope of TSU's survival.

Apr 14, 2012 7:31 PM

105 None Apr 14, 2012 7:26 PM

106 He speaks rudely to Faculty and thinks he is a dictator. Apr 14, 2012 7:17 PM

107 He once understood what a university was. Apr 14, 2012 6:07 PM

108 The provost is a scholar and a gentleman, and he works very hard Apr 14, 2012 3:08 PM

109 His commitment to research Apr 14, 2012 1:26 PM

111 None Apr 13, 2012 10:06 PM

112 None Apr 13, 2012 8:48 PM

113 Has vision, just hard for him to manuever his colleagues to execute it Apr 13, 2012 5:19 PM

114 see #10 Apr 13, 2012 4:08 PM

115 Knows what to do to improve the academic environment for both students and faculty Apr 13, 2012 3:50 PM

116 not sure Apr 13, 2012 3:32 PM

118 GOOD Apr 13, 2012 3:15 PM

119 Very bold in making the right decisions and works hard. Apr 13, 2012 3:08 PM

121 leadership Apr 13, 2012 3:02 PM

122 knowledgeable, future thinking Apr 13, 2012 2:40 PM


124 attempts to bring in high quality personnel Apr 13, 2012 2:12 PM

24 of 77


125 An attempt to bring TSU in line academically with peers Apr 13, 2012 2:08 PM


127 Persistence Apr 13, 2012 1:31 PM

128 no opinion Apr 13, 2012 1:30 PM

130 Knowledge base Apr 13, 2012 1:23 PM

Associate Provost

1 works hard Apr 27, 2012 5:59 PM

2 good Apr 27, 2012 2:12 PM

3 Do not know Apr 27, 2012 12:49 PM

4 Smart Apr 27, 2012 11:59 AM

5 Faculty development Apr 27, 2012 11:49 AM

6 Collaboration with selected individuals Apr 27, 2012 11:26 AM

7 Excellent Multitasking, Collegial Apr 27, 2012 11:22 AM


11 Prose skills Apr 26, 2012 5:04 PM

12 Task Oriented Apr 26, 2012 3:02 PM

13 no Apr 26, 2012 2:40 PM

14 NONE Apr 26, 2012 12:01 PM

15 Organization and communication Apr 26, 2012 10:51 AM

25 of 77


17 I do not know who this person is. Apr 25, 2012 6:31 PM

18 resilence, passionate and optimistic attitude Apr 25, 2012 5:47 PM

19 facilitator, seeks input, collaborative, has greatly improved communication between her office and chairs and asst. deans Apr 25, 2012 5:44 PM

20 n/a Apr 25, 2012 4:49 PM

21 good goals & vision; people-oriented Apr 25, 2012 4:04 PM

22 understanding is bad Apr 25, 2012 3:59 PM

23 None Apr 25, 2012 3:27 PM

24 N/A Apr 25, 2012 3:02 PM

25 ACADEMIC QUALIFCATIONS AND EXPERIENCE Apr 25, 2012 2:59 PM

26 Heh is working to assist new faculty in research? Apr 25, 2012 2:36 PM

27 Do not know who the Associate Provost is. Apr 25, 2012 2:09 PM

28 Dedication to research development Apr 25, 2012 2:00 PM

29 absolutely none Apr 25, 2012 1:55 PM

31 Organizing Events Apr 25, 2012 9:31 AM

32 no comment Apr 24, 2012 10:45 AM

33 None Apr 24, 2012 8:50 AM

35 N/A Apr 23, 2012 4:54 PM

36 good at communicating with deans, faculty, etc. Apr 23, 2012 3:12 PM

39 She follows the President's Leadership Apr 23, 2012 2:09 PM

26 of 77


41 None Apr 23, 2012 1:51 PM

43 Likable, personable and seems to be easy to work with Apr 23, 2012 10:18 AM

44 none Apr 23, 2012 8:11 AM

45 Organized- Apr 22, 2012 4:02 PM

46 none Apr 22, 2012 3:27 PM

47 Do not know what she does Apr 22, 2012 9:46 AM


51 None Apr 20, 2012 4:34 PM

52 Hard working, dependable, responsive, solution-minded Apr 20, 2012 3:16 PM

53 She has an understanding spirit, and attempts to create an atmosphere of Growth Apr 20, 2012 3:08 PM

54 None observed Apr 20, 2012 3:03 PM

56 n/a Apr 20, 2012 2:33 PM

57 Dedicated to improving academic excellance Apr 20, 2012 2:18 PM

58 has better inderstanding of the faculty Apr 20, 2012 12:51 PM

59 no clue Apr 20, 2012 11:25 AM

60 Willling to Listen Apr 19, 2012 4:18 PM

61 She is the glue that is holding academic affairs together; she has many responsibilities and we can always reach her,night and day.

Apr 19, 2012 3:56 PM

64 none observed Apr 18, 2012 5:25 PM

65 follow the bean counter who follows the bean counter Apr 18, 2012 3:17 PM

27 of 77


66 Not qualified for the job Apr 18, 2012 3:02 PM

67 N/A Apr 18, 2012 11:17 AM

68 Student Centered Apr 18, 2012 11:08 AM

69 initative- but moving too slow don't know what to do Apr 18, 2012 10:24 AM

70 n/a Apr 18, 2012 9:48 AM

73 Only wants to deal w/high profile items Apr 17, 2012 4:34 PM

75 Compliments of work. Apr 17, 2012 3:06 PM

76 has common sense Apr 17, 2012 1:02 PM

77 When she acts like an academic she is fine Apr 17, 2012 10:56 AM

78 None Apr 16, 2012 5:21 PM

80 Open, Respectful of All Faculty, Seems to Listen Apr 16, 2012 3:49 PM

81 thinks like a business man Apr 16, 2012 2:56 PM

82 n/a Apr 16, 2012 2:25 PM

83 None Apr 16, 2012 2:09 PM

85 Logical Apr 16, 2012 1:45 PM

87 None Apr 16, 2012 1:36 PM

88 none Apr 16, 2012 1:08 PM

89 Responsibility, learner Apr 16, 2012 1:03 PM

90 Professional background Apr 16, 2012 12:22 PM

28 of 77


91 NA Apr 16, 2012 12:21 PM

92 Responsive Apr 16, 2012 12:11 PM

93 Which one? There are several associate/assistant provosts. Apr 16, 2012 12:07 PM

95 Attendance Apr 16, 2012 11:43 AM

96 Does understand research but is constrained by the president on what he can do Apr 16, 2012 11:29 AM

97 NONE Apr 16, 2012 11:17 AM

98 Focus on academic issues Apr 16, 2012 10:54 AM

99 listening to president and provost Apr 16, 2012 10:12 AM

100 good manager of department chairs and deans Apr 16, 2012 10:02 AM

102 Interpersonal skills and understading of academics Apr 15, 2012 10:02 PM

103 Extremely pleasant. Very passionate about the faculty. Willing to engage in healthy discussion with the faculty.Developed the TLEC

Apr 15, 2012 8:58 PM

104 This Associate Provost is dedicated, perceptive, highly intelligent, concerned about and available to faculty, andhardworking.

Apr 14, 2012 7:31 PM

105 None Apr 14, 2012 7:26 PM

106 Dr. Guillory is the only sensible one. Apr 14, 2012 7:17 PM

107 She is basically a decent person. Apr 14, 2012 6:07 PM

108 Knows and models high standards as a faculty member and scholar Apr 14, 2012 3:08 PM

109 His commitment to rtesearch Apr 14, 2012 1:26 PM

110 Organized Apr 14, 2012 12:01 AM

29 of 77


111 none Apr 13, 2012 10:06 PM

112 None Apr 13, 2012 8:48 PM

113 Accessible and Persistant Apr 13, 2012 5:19 PM

114 see #10 Apr 13, 2012 4:08 PM

115 Know what it takes to provide the support for faculty and students success Apr 13, 2012 3:50 PM

116 ? Apr 13, 2012 3:32 PM

117 very organized Apr 13, 2012 3:19 PM

118 GOOD Apr 13, 2012 3:15 PM

119 very supportive and easy to approach. Apr 13, 2012 3:08 PM

121 leadership Apr 13, 2012 3:02 PM

122 Alert to problems, available to faculty Apr 13, 2012 2:40 PM


124 working with faculty Apr 13, 2012 2:12 PM

125 n/a Apr 13, 2012 2:08 PM


127 Getting things done Apr 13, 2012 1:31 PM


130 Hard worker Apr 13, 2012 1:23 PM

30 of 77

31 of 77

Q6. What are the weaknesses (if any) of the Administrators?

President

1 Takes too long to cut dead weight faculty! Apr 27, 2012 5:59 PM

2 Communication and turn around of paper work for approval. Apr 27, 2012 4:08 PM

3 Does not give the feeling of being receptive to criticism Apr 27, 2012 2:26 PM

4 fair Apr 27, 2012 2:12 PM

5 Not surrounded by those that can give him executable advise. Apr 27, 2012 12:49 PM

6 arrogant, dimissive, does not think that TSU has any talent worth using although TSU has played a role in who his hasbecome. Thinks everything from UH is great and everything at TSU is bad. His team he has in place. No one is going togive Ms Adair any money. The president also seems to have a bias against African American women. He does not havean African American women in a major cabinet position. He does not seem to notice the provost biases against AfricanAmerican men and women. He has a very weak team.

Apr 27, 2012 11:59 AM

7 Micro Management Apr 27, 2012 11:26 AM

8 He often delegates without giving authority to perform. Allowing individuals to circumvent existing authority structures. Apr 27, 2012 11:22 AM


10 Micro Managing sometimes Apr 27, 2012 11:10 AM

11 Hard to relate to. Is not a people person Apr 27, 2012 11:02 AM

12 Lack of genuine concern for faculty development and faculty mentoring. If you care about students well being, you mustinvest in the faculty and their professional development.

Apr 26, 2012 7:29 PM

13 engaging the culture of the academy to achieve shared goals Apr 26, 2012 5:04 PM

14 Dictator-like mentality Apr 26, 2012 3:02 PM

15 don't know, not visible Apr 26, 2012 2:40 PM

16 Too defensive of his actions and no actions. Apr 26, 2012 10:51 AM

32 of 77


17 Not trustworthy, connected to the wrong people, unable to be unbiased and to help TSU by recognizing the talent at TSU Apr 26, 2012 8:41 AM

18 Does not listen to faculty concerns, favoritism Apr 26, 2012 7:47 AM

19 He supports Ohia's bias toward women and african americans proceeds anything that he does. It is atrocious. Apr 25, 2012 6:31 PM

20 none as of yet Apr 25, 2012 5:47 PM

22 Not taking in ALUMNI's input Apr 25, 2012 4:49 PM

23 belittles Provost & faculty Apr 25, 2012 4:04 PM

24 attitude Apr 25, 2012 3:59 PM

25 He is too concerned with his own image, which is not as pristine as he believes. He is neither an eloquent nor effectivepublic speaker; he becomes defensive when his authority is questioned in front of groups of people. He becomes angrywhen students/faculty/staff do not immediately recognize him even though he makes almost no attempt to raise his profilearound campus, he barks at people and often “shoots the messenger”, he allows himself to be swayed by the opinions ofthose who have continually shown that they do not have TSU’s best interest at heart, he is not at all approachable orpersonable and, most telling of all…he’s a bully.

Apr 25, 2012 3:27 PM

26 N/A Apr 25, 2012 3:02 PM

27 MICROMANAGES SOMETIMES Apr 25, 2012 2:59 PM

28 Does not see the Present enough Apr 25, 2012 2:09 PM

29 Visibility Apr 25, 2012 2:00 PM

30 Has a tendency to listen to his inner circle as opposed to hearing from the entire constituency Apr 25, 2012 1:55 PM

31 His way or no way. Missing big problems in Finance Apr 25, 2012 1:47 PM

32 Close-minded, knows it all, unapproachable Apr 25, 2012 9:31 AM

33 Never see him or recognize his presence on campus Apr 24, 2012 3:45 PM

34 micro-manager, overseer attitude Apr 24, 2012 3:21 PM

33 of 77


35 don't listen to faculty, don't give back, not equitable Apr 24, 2012 2:51 PM

36 serious lack of integrity Apr 24, 2012 10:51 AM

37 Not involved with the faculty and staff enough to recognize the productivity within each department Apr 24, 2012 10:45 AM

38 Does not interact personally with TSU employees. Apr 24, 2012 8:50 AM

39 He is not concerned about the needs of the faculty and staff. Apr 23, 2012 5:51 PM

40 He does not have the right support staff that can help him become better with the community, students, faculty, staff; etc.He has his "croonie" and if you voice your opinion then you are a threat and may get fired if tenure doesn't help you.

Apr 23, 2012 4:54 PM

42 I am not involved in their decision making processes Apr 23, 2012 2:09 PM

43 Expert in all matters Apr 23, 2012 1:51 PM

44 Devisive, not a team player, unpredictable and arbitrary. Apr 23, 2012 11:08 AM

45 micromanager Apr 23, 2012 10:49 AM

46 Des not seem to value input from faculty very much Apr 23, 2012 10:18 AM

47 not making strong professional judgements. Apr 23, 2012 8:11 AM

48 Too many high paid admin- not enough attention to funding student fees/tuition Apr 22, 2012 4:02 PM

49 does not take others ideas into consideration Apr 22, 2012 3:27 PM

50 recruiting, graduation rate, lack of concern with faculty Apr 22, 2012 9:46 AM

51 Poor Leadership Apr 21, 2012 9:49 AM

52 Too many to mention Apr 20, 2012 4:34 PM

53 manipulative, playing politics, very incapable in high education management and research, fraudulently committed $5million university matching fund to NASA URC Program with no source to pay for it

Apr 20, 2012 3:23 PM

34 of 77


54 reflexively defensive, cannot abide criticism Apr 20, 2012 3:16 PM

55 Strong willed Apr 20, 2012 3:08 PM

56 Defensiveness; tendency toward tyranny; tendency to bully Apr 20, 2012 3:03 PM

57 no cost of living adjustments Apr 20, 2012 2:42 PM

58 n/a Apr 20, 2012 2:33 PM

59 To busy total relate to departmental issues Apr 20, 2012 2:18 PM

60 Is not pushing enough to promote the university Apr 20, 2012 12:51 PM

61 lack of team work Apr 20, 2012 11:25 AM

62 Dictatorial Apr 19, 2012 4:18 PM

63 should be out fundraising Apr 19, 2012 3:56 PM

64 not communicating with TSU Family enough"The People" Apr 19, 2012 7:31 AM

65 Defensive to constructive feedback and could improve on sharing University successes internally as well as externally Apr 18, 2012 5:25 PM

66 Lack of interest in the research Apr 18, 2012 3:02 PM

67 Greedy, Selfish, Believes himself to be more knowledgeable than he is Apr 18, 2012 11:17 AM

69 Do not listen enough to Deans, Directors, faculty & staff Apr 18, 2012 10:24 AM

70 n/a Apr 18, 2012 9:48 AM

71 Too little input from experienced educators Apr 18, 2012 9:29 AM

72 Aloof, remote, no teaching experience, paid way too much, doesn't take criticism well at all. Apr 17, 2012 9:57 PM

73 NA Apr 17, 2012 4:34 PM

35 of 77


74 Will not allow out of state training for staff to be more effective. Apr 17, 2012 3:06 PM

75 Has no understanding of the faculty concerns or problems faculties face in taching 100 level survey courses Apr 17, 2012 10:56 AM

76 Not allowing students to register themselves, it makes the school appear as a nursery instead of a university Apr 17, 2012 8:42 AM

77 Micromanager intent on destroying TSU, vindictive Apr 17, 2012 7:15 AM

78 Not an administrator, does not have the qualification Apr 16, 2012 5:21 PM

79 Makes some unilateral decisions, like the fence around campus, murals, trees in plaza Apr 16, 2012 3:49 PM

80 insensitive to faculty issues Apr 16, 2012 2:56 PM

81 n/a Apr 16, 2012 2:25 PM

82 Isolation Apr 16, 2012 2:09 PM

83 Lack of understanding of academics Apr 16, 2012 2:08 PM

84 Busy Apr 16, 2012 1:45 PM

86 Non-Effective Hands-off Leadership. Consistently stifles the opinions/recommendations of faculty and staff. Apr 16, 2012 1:36 PM

87 Listening Apr 16, 2012 1:03 PM

88 Leadership in terms of providing inclusion strategies with the university constituents, particularly the faculty Apr 16, 2012 12:22 PM

89 Closing Programs Apr 16, 2012 12:21 PM

90 Arbitrary decisions Apr 16, 2012 12:11 PM

91 Is overpaid and has blotted administration, favors and seems to reward some rather than faculty contribution Apr 16, 2012 12:07 PM

93 Empathy Apr 16, 2012 11:43 AM

94 Does Not Understand Academia and Research Apr 16, 2012 11:29 AM

36 of 77


95 His VP For Student Services Apr 16, 2012 11:28 AM

96 NOT PROVIDING SERVICES FOR THE STUDENTS Apr 16, 2012 11:17 AM

97 Not sure Apr 16, 2012 10:54 AM

98 not accessible to faculty but micromanaging Apr 16, 2012 10:12 AM

99 N/A Apr 16, 2012 10:02 AM

100 Doesn't back his staff in their decision making Apr 16, 2012 9:13 AM

101 do not care abou faculty Apr 16, 2012 8:51 AM

102 He is a very negative person, who do not understand academics Apr 15, 2012 10:02 PM

103 Very little visibility positive or negative for new faculty Apr 15, 2012 8:58 PM

104 This President's most crippling flaw is his apparent preference for being feared and catered to instead of trusted andreasoned with. The President's defensive unwillingness to hear input other than praise and agreement is his hamstringand led him to surround himself with a barricade of intimidated subordinates instead of a council of innovative change-makers. Honest and helpful differences of opinion have no way of getting to this President through his entrenchment ofcroneyism, which has spread power-mongering and outside grant-making (money-grubbing) as the only two modes ofsurvival-let alone success-at TSU. Any innovations that might attract and retain highly motivated students have very littlechance of getting through to the President for implementation, unless one happens upon an insider of his who is willing torisk putting it in front of him. Despite the barricade of lower-level administrators with which the President bars the facultyfrom access to him, he nevertheless makes statements about how the faculty should have fixed thegraduation/retention/low morale issues that only he and his Cabinet have the authority to mandate.

Apr 14, 2012 7:31 PM

105 Lack of Leadership skills Apr 14, 2012 7:26 PM

106 He doesn't control the excesses of the other administrators. He is just too weak. Apr 14, 2012 7:17 PM

107 He has no understanding or interest in thye faculty; he cannot take criticism. Apr 14, 2012 6:07 PM

108 Listens to (and believes) mentees against faculty Apr 14, 2012 3:08 PM

109 His relationship with the Senate Apr 14, 2012 1:26 PM

37 of 77


110 Arrogant, does not listen to anyone outside his cabinet, looks down on TSU faculty and the university, does not engagethe faculty enough, does not really want to be at TSU, does not ensure that salary is distributed equitably.

Apr 14, 2012 12:01 AM

111 Bad Attitude Apr 13, 2012 10:06 PM

112 Doesn't seem to care Apr 13, 2012 8:48 PM

113 Not well known or recognzed, appears to be ashamed of our university's great history, hasn't gone through the academicranks so he can't relate to what he has been entrusted to govern

Apr 13, 2012 5:19 PM

114 see #10 Apr 13, 2012 4:08 PM

115 Does not appreciate the need to productively engage and provide faculty with the necessary incentives to make successout of the students (teaching and research)

Apr 13, 2012 3:50 PM

116 listens to four selected employees Apr 13, 2012 3:32 PM

117 fosters research Apr 13, 2012 3:19 PM

118 GOOD Apr 13, 2012 3:15 PM

119 Very blunt Apr 13, 2012 3:08 PM

120 I do not believe that the President has any idea of what is really happening in enrollment management. The leaders thathe has in place are ALL WRONG! The recruitment numbers are low and have been for the last 3 years, yet he has thesame leaders in place. Often times he just changes their titles. Either he is unaware or he has token staff members. Theproper tools are not in place for enrollment staff to properly do their job, yet incompetent leaders are making extremelyhigh salaries while the "worker bees" are barely able to feed their families and have to make do with 20th century tools.

Apr 13, 2012 3:03 PM

121 attitude towards faculty and staff Apr 13, 2012 3:02 PM

122 Numbers oriented at the expense of human elements Apr 13, 2012 2:40 PM

123 don't know Apr 13, 2012 2:12 PM

124 Visibility and communication, particularly with staff Apr 13, 2012 2:08 PM

125 micro management; bias in paying 'favorites' more Apr 13, 2012 1:50 PM

38 of 77


126 n/a Apr 13, 2012 1:45 PM

128 strongly opinionated Apr 13, 2012 1:30 PM

129 sometimes forgets recommentions Apr 13, 2012 1:28 PM

130 low visbility and interaction with faculty Apr 13, 2012 1:23 PM

Provost

1 Does not evaluate situations properly Apr 27, 2012 5:59 PM

2 Communication and turn around of paper work for approval Apr 27, 2012 4:08 PM

3 Does not give the feeling of being receptive to criticism Apr 27, 2012 2:26 PM

4 fair Apr 27, 2012 2:12 PM

5 Over-reacts before he listens to total problem. Apr 27, 2012 12:49 PM

6 To scattered and does not appreciate African American men or women. He only hires African men or foreigners forimprotant positions. Chauvanistic and has too many meetings. Feels that your time is not important. He reschedulesmeetings without regard to their impact on others schedule.

Apr 27, 2012 11:59 AM

7 Limited scope of the instructional mission Apr 27, 2012 11:26 AM

8 He should be a bit more forceful in dealing with academic leadership who do a lot of talking but aren't performing. Apr 27, 2012 11:22 AM


10 Too accepting some of the times Apr 27, 2012 11:10 AM

13 coordination of organizational functions Apr 26, 2012 5:04 PM

14 Uknown Apr 26, 2012 3:02 PM


39 of 77


16 Availability to listen to the faculty concern directly. Apr 26, 2012 10:51 AM

17 Trusting people he should not trust - the provost himself is fine, but he needs to see that there are lots of problematicpeople at TSU, and he should rely solely on his personal experiences and observations concerning people

Apr 26, 2012 8:41 AM

18 Do not want to be disgreed with Apr 26, 2012 7:47 AM

19 Everything he does. His biasis toward women and african americans proceeds anything that he does. It is atrocious. Apr 25, 2012 6:31 PM


21 too many meetings so not often available, biased towards sciences Apr 25, 2012 5:44 PM

22 Not listening to employees concerns Apr 25, 2012 4:49 PM

23 Screams, doesn't listen Apr 25, 2012 4:04 PM

24 Don't know what "hell" he is doing Apr 25, 2012 3:59 PM

25 He spends too much of his time traveling and not enough time in the trenches with his sleeves rolled up, speaking tostudents and faculty about real ways to improve the university. The Provost does not have a realistic opinion of the day-to-day running of the academic units. Because the deans are so afraid of him and of losing their jobs, they do notaccurately report the goings on in their units which keep the status quo of frustrated faculty, dissatisfied students andineffective administration. The provost routinely abuses his power, for example, when he bursts into a room and expectsthat all within should immediately stop in their tracks and cater to whatever whim he has in mind. Often he does not ask tobe helped but demands that it be so, often in the rudest tone imaginable. He seems to believe that the university is hisoffice and there is no work more important than catering to his needs. Also, his Executive Assistant, Ms. LaShanta Gill, isknown university-wide as one of the most ineffective and surly administrative professionals and yet continues to beemployed in that capacity even when there is a revolving door of receptionist/administrative assistants working in hisoffice. One feels as though they shouldn’t waste time learning their names as they are gone so quickly and are never ableto help anyway.

Apr 25, 2012 3:27 PM

26 No known Apr 25, 2012 3:02 PM

27 TOO TOLERANT OF OTHERS SOMETIMES Apr 25, 2012 2:59 PM

28 Is not friendly Apr 25, 2012 2:09 PM

40 of 77



30 Is unapproachable and is absolutely sure that what he was told is the TRUTH. Apr 25, 2012 1:55 PM

32 Reverses decisions without due dilligence Apr 25, 2012 9:31 AM

33 Interceeds on student issues before the fact are presented Apr 24, 2012 3:45 PM

34 too emotional, does not listen well Apr 24, 2012 3:21 PM

35 dont' listen to faculty,j don't give back, not equitable, don't listen to students Apr 24, 2012 2:51 PM

37 Academics are still at a low stance, students are not being equipped with the necessary tools be achieve success aftergraduation

Apr 24, 2012 10:45 AM

38 Does not follow up on directives to deans and/or chairs; indecisive; does not respond to faculty concerns in a timelymanner; supports wrongdoing of lower administrators; supports less faculty involvement in university governance;prioritizes research over teaching & service; does not implement recruitment, retention, and graduation of students.

Apr 24, 2012 8:50 AM

40 He's a yes man. Apr 23, 2012 4:54 PM

41 too-narrow preoccumpation with graduation & retention Apr 23, 2012 3:12 PM


43 Reactionary Apr 23, 2012 1:51 PM

44 None Apr 23, 2012 11:08 AM

45 inexperienced Apr 23, 2012 10:49 AM

46 Tries to take all too much; needs to delegate more Apr 23, 2012 10:18 AM

47 not making strong professional judgements. Apr 23, 2012 8:11 AM

48 Does not consult faculty to strategize growth of programs Apr 22, 2012 4:02 PM

49 is not a fair person Apr 22, 2012 3:27 PM

41 of 77


50 not authority over deans, blaming faculty for all woes Apr 22, 2012 9:46 AM

51 Poor Leadership Apr 21, 2012 9:49 AM

55 Swift to judge Apr 20, 2012 3:08 PM

56 Emotionalism Apr 20, 2012 3:03 PM

57 no cost of living adjustment Apr 20, 2012 2:42 PM

58 n/a Apr 20, 2012 2:33 PM

59 To busy to focus on academic faculty issues Apr 20, 2012 2:18 PM

60 similarly Apr 20, 2012 12:51 PM

61 personal communication.lack of team work Apr 20, 2012 11:25 AM

62 Lack of Integrity Apr 19, 2012 4:18 PM

63 better planning; too many urgent meetings because of poor planning and organizing of schedule Apr 19, 2012 3:56 PM

64 not taking time to know the staff- Apr 19, 2012 7:31 AM

65 Clear bias for sciences and seems outside his capabilities; bully Apr 18, 2012 5:25 PM

66 Not paying attention to the research at Tsu Apr 18, 2012 3:02 PM

67 Doesn't think things through before making ad hoc decisions. No planning acumen. Apr 18, 2012 11:17 AM

68 Arrogant Apr 18, 2012 11:08 AM

69 Do not listen to Deans, Directors, faculty Apr 18, 2012 10:24 AM

70 n/a Apr 18, 2012 9:48 AM

71 Too many decisions w/o regarding to Deans Apr 18, 2012 9:29 AM

42 of 77


72 Does not appear to respect concept of "shared governance" with the faculty. Apr 17, 2012 9:57 PM

73 Travels too much Apr 17, 2012 4:34 PM

74 Will not allow out of state training for staff to be more effective.Does not speak to staff, crude, and lacks social skills.Does not inform TSU community of new changes.

Apr 17, 2012 3:06 PM

75 Has no understanding of the faculty concerns and the problems faculty faces in teComing from a professional schoolbackground he has no understanding what the facult faces in teaching survey courses We spent too much time in doingthings which are irrelevant to our teaching,or research.

Apr 17, 2012 10:56 AM

76 Not actively promoting staff who seek to be faculty. Apr 17, 2012 8:42 AM

77 Yes man Apr 17, 2012 7:15 AM

78 He is a dictator and does not listen Apr 16, 2012 5:21 PM

80 arrogant Apr 16, 2012 2:56 PM

81 n/a Apr 16, 2012 2:25 PM

82 week acdemic skills Apr 16, 2012 2:09 PM

83 Tends to be judgemental Apr 16, 2012 2:08 PM

84 Overworked Apr 16, 2012 1:45 PM

85 unapproachable, rude Apr 16, 2012 1:36 PM

86 Does not display problem solving skills, uses intimidation/strong arm tactics instead Apr 16, 2012 1:36 PM

87 Listening Apr 16, 2012 1:03 PM

88 Stewardship in terms of providing shared vision strategies for the overall direction university constituents, particularly thefaculty

Apr 16, 2012 12:22 PM

89 Acknowledgement of faculty workload; e.g., teaching load, research, and service Apr 16, 2012 12:21 PM

43 of 77


90 Arbitrary decisions Apr 16, 2012 12:11 PM

91 Is overpaid and has blotted administration. No attention to quality education Apr 16, 2012 12:07 PM

92 Preferences for males in salary negotiations Apr 16, 2012 12:00 PM

93 Hot headed and over reacts, spends too much time with trivial things Apr 16, 2012 11:43 AM

94 Needs to get out from under the Presidents thumb Apr 16, 2012 11:29 AM

96 HELPING STUDENTS FIND JOBS AFTER GRADUATION Apr 16, 2012 11:17 AM

97 Not sure Apr 16, 2012 10:54 AM

98 not accessible to faculty but a micromanager Apr 16, 2012 10:12 AM

99 N/A Apr 16, 2012 10:02 AM

100 Given the Deans to much power Apr 16, 2012 9:13 AM

102 Promises more than the president will allow him to deliver Apr 15, 2012 10:02 PM

103 Seems to be EXTREMELY focused on research productivity, yet I have not seen him help me or any of my facultycolleagues in research endeavors.

Apr 15, 2012 8:58 PM

104 This Provost's only weakness is that he seems to be directed by the politics of his President's administrative style. Ibelieve this Provost would have cleared out the lower-level administrative corruption and croneyism that drives outstudents and beats down dynamic faculty members, if his energies were not misdirected by the President's focus outwardon numbers and agencies, instead of inward on implementing best practices, fair and progressive policies, andtransparent procedures that directly impact student satisfaction with their TSU experience.

Apr 14, 2012 7:31 PM

105 Poor academic management and reaserch management skills. Poor human relations. Lac Apr 14, 2012 7:26 PM

106 He shows off too much and talks down to everyone he comes in contact with. He is too rude and thinks he owns theUniversity. Needs to be harnessed.

Apr 14, 2012 7:17 PM

107 He has lost his sense of academics, and merely does what he is told. He is dishonest, and you cannot rely on what hetells you.

Apr 14, 2012 6:07 PM

44 of 77


108 Expects too much extras from already overworked faculty Apr 14, 2012 3:08 PM

110 Mirco-manager, does not value african american men in regards to hiring them for administrative positions in his cabinet,not a good evaluator of personnel, he has hored quite a few senior administrators who are not up to the job.

Apr 14, 2012 12:01 AM

111 Bad Attitude Do Not Understand Academics or People Apr 13, 2012 10:06 PM

112 Employees friends only Apr 13, 2012 8:48 PM

113 Doesnt know how to MAKE things happen, doesn't appear to be respected, goes around and around in circles having tobeg to get things done, doesn't seem to have a back bone, seems afraid to make a decision, relys too much on the deansto run/handle things

Apr 13, 2012 5:19 PM

114 see #10 Apr 13, 2012 4:08 PM

115 He is not given a free hand to provide academic leadership to the university Apr 13, 2012 3:50 PM

116 not sure Apr 13, 2012 3:32 PM

117 shifts work to the assoc.ppovost Apr 13, 2012 3:19 PM

118 GOOD Apr 13, 2012 3:15 PM

119 Very blunt Apr 13, 2012 3:08 PM

121 none Apr 13, 2012 3:02 PM

122 None Apr 13, 2012 2:40 PM

123 out of touch with faculty and staff needs Apr 13, 2012 2:12 PM

124 Overbearing, not realistic Apr 13, 2012 2:08 PM

125 rude; micro management; condescending Apr 13, 2012 1:50 PM

126 n/a Apr 13, 2012 1:45 PM

127 Very mean, no respect for others Apr 13, 2012 1:36 PM

45 of 77



Associate Provost

1 Rigid Apr 27, 2012 5:59 PM

2 Communication and turn around of paper work for approval Apr 27, 2012 4:08 PM

4 fair Apr 27, 2012 2:12 PM

5 Don't know Apr 27, 2012 12:49 PM

6 Implements orders that she does not agree with. Apr 27, 2012 11:59 AM

7 Transparency of actions/demands Apr 27, 2012 11:26 AM


10 Creats very poor and hostile work environment Apr 27, 2012 11:10 AM

13 management skills Apr 26, 2012 5:04 PM

14 Concerned with unimportant, trivial matters Apr 26, 2012 3:02 PM


16 Do not know. Apr 26, 2012 10:51 AM

18 Does not listen very well Apr 26, 2012 7:47 AM



21 too much on her plate Apr 25, 2012 5:44 PM

22 Not listening to employess converns Apr 25, 2012 4:49 PM

46 of 77


23 disorganized Apr 25, 2012 4:04 PM

24 Drama Queen Apr 25, 2012 3:59 PM

25 What can be said about the harried Associate Provost of Academic Affairs that hasn’t already been whispered aroundcampus? She spends so much time writing letters, producing policy and, proofing documents for the president andprovost (tasks that should be done by their respective admin staff) that she is barely able to focus on her on real work,whatever that is. Her primary responsibility of researching best practices for the university should actually be done byInstitutional Effectiveness. She is so busy doing everyone else’s job that her faculty stipend is being wasted as she hasno time to teach. Perhaps if she were to take advantage of her distinguished professorship position she would have theability to interact with faculty and students thus making her an empathetic and effective associate provost. One feels thather general attitude might also be improved, and she might speak more civilly to people, if she were not so consumedwith cleaning up after the provost and president. She employees several graduate student assistants to help with thismassive undertaking, however they are expected to work as fulltime staff thus undermining their academic abilities andpotential. She should employ full-time staff to do this full-time staff work. During instances of contacting the office of theassociate provost her assistant, Ms. Tiffany Vaughner is very efficient and responds in a timely manner, quite unlike theprovost’s executive assistant. More often than not, Ms. Vaughner is considerably more courteous, knowledgeable, andhelpful than Ms. Gill.

Apr 25, 2012 3:27 PM

26 N/A Apr 25, 2012 3:02 PM

28 Have never met the Associate Provost Apr 25, 2012 2:09 PM


30 Is this lady for real? Apr 25, 2012 1:55 PM

32 Unknown Apr 25, 2012 9:31 AM

35 don't listen to caulty, don't give back, don't listen to studentls Apr 24, 2012 2:51 PM

38 Dictates and manipulates faculty to accomplish her goals; creates an unpleasant atmosphere so that faculty are ill atease in her presence.

Apr 24, 2012 8:50 AM

40 N/A Apr 23, 2012 4:54 PM

41 reputedly hard on her own staff Apr 23, 2012 3:12 PM

47 of 77



43 Dumb Apr 23, 2012 1:51 PM

44 Busybody; absence of leadership ability; indecisive and lack of understanding of role of associates position. Apr 23, 2012 11:08 AM

45 inexperienced Apr 23, 2012 10:49 AM

46 Role clarity Apr 23, 2012 10:18 AM

47 not making srong professional judgements. Apr 23, 2012 8:11 AM

48 Totally insensitive to faculty input-is willing to railroad Provost/President's choice candidates for admin positions Apr 22, 2012 4:02 PM

49 n/a Apr 22, 2012 3:27 PM

50 Do not know what she does Apr 22, 2012 9:46 AM

55 New to the administrative side Apr 20, 2012 3:08 PM

56 Unwillingness to listen; lack of knowledge of administration Apr 20, 2012 3:03 PM

57 no cost of living adjustment Apr 20, 2012 2:42 PM

58 n/a Apr 20, 2012 2:33 PM

59 To busy to focus on academic faculty issues Apr 20, 2012 2:18 PM

60 I do not see any weakness in his attitude and range of possibilities offered to him Apr 20, 2012 12:51 PM

61 no clue Apr 20, 2012 11:25 AM

62 Too many tasks Apr 19, 2012 4:18 PM

63 She defers to the provost too much; she should run her own area and use her own skills which are outstanding; she haspower and doesn't use it.

Apr 19, 2012 3:56 PM

65 Unclear of the position's purpose other than facilitates opening faculty meeting. Unclear of the value to University Apr 18, 2012 5:25 PM

48 of 77


66 Poor knowledge of pure research Apr 18, 2012 3:02 PM

67 Obviously not qualified for the position. Apr 18, 2012 11:17 AM

69 Slow to make decisions and follow up Apr 18, 2012 10:24 AM

70 n/a Apr 18, 2012 9:48 AM

73 Acts Arrogant Apr 17, 2012 4:34 PM

74 Associate Provost for Research abuses position for self-gain and vendetta's, lacks integrity, and takes credit for otherpeople's work. Does not think ideas through.

Apr 17, 2012 3:06 PM

75 Totally disconnected with the faculty concerns Apr 17, 2012 10:56 AM

77 Focused on self and accomplishments, vindictive Apr 17, 2012 7:15 AM

78 She is a puppet Apr 16, 2012 5:21 PM

80 does not appreciate research Apr 16, 2012 2:56 PM

81 n/a Apr 16, 2012 2:25 PM

82 Trivial but not important issues Apr 16, 2012 2:09 PM

83 Appears to have pre-determiined ideas about faculty/staff Apr 16, 2012 2:08 PM

84 Not enough power Apr 16, 2012 1:45 PM

86 N/A Apr 16, 2012 1:36 PM

87 Experience Apr 16, 2012 1:03 PM

88 Relationship in terms of providing team building strategies with the university constituents, particularly the faculty Apr 16, 2012 12:22 PM

89 NA Apr 16, 2012 12:21 PM

90 None Apr 16, 2012 12:11 PM

49 of 77


91 There have been many administrators linked to the provost's office so I have no idea who occupies this position at themoment or what it is that they do in this office

Apr 16, 2012 12:07 PM

93 Not focused, makes decision without critical thinking Apr 16, 2012 11:43 AM

94 NA Apr 16, 2012 11:29 AM

96 NONE Apr 16, 2012 11:17 AM

97 Not sure Apr 16, 2012 10:54 AM

98 a follower, cant tell who she is Apr 16, 2012 10:12 AM

99 N/A Apr 16, 2012 10:02 AM

102 None as it relates to her job Apr 15, 2012 10:02 PM

103 None observed so far. Apr 15, 2012 8:58 PM

104 This brilliant woman has been a much less effective, much more harried administrator than TSU needed her to bebecause she seems to be micro-managed by her President, who tells her what to do instead of asking her what needs tobe done and how the team of upper administrators might work together to achieve those shared goals.

Apr 14, 2012 7:31 PM

105 Lack Apr 14, 2012 7:26 PM

106 She doesn't display any independence from the Provost. She always refers to the Provost wants it this way. She seemsnot to have her own mind.

Apr 14, 2012 7:17 PM

107 She is not a bad person, she seems to have an interest in academic issues, but little power. Apr 14, 2012 6:07 PM

108 Overworks graduate student staff. Apr 14, 2012 3:08 PM

110 Mirco-manager. Apr 14, 2012 12:01 AM

111 No Clue of What Is Going On Apr 13, 2012 10:06 PM

112 N/A Apr 13, 2012 8:48 PM

50 of 77


113 Can be abrasive Apr 13, 2012 5:19 PM

114 see #10 Apr 13, 2012 4:08 PM

115 Limited by the final decision making process Apr 13, 2012 3:50 PM

116 many Apr 13, 2012 3:32 PM

117 is over too much - micro-management Apr 13, 2012 3:19 PM

118 GOOD Apr 13, 2012 3:15 PM

121 none Apr 13, 2012 3:02 PM

122 None Apr 13, 2012 2:40 PM

123 not good people skills Apr 13, 2012 2:12 PM

124 n/a Apr 13, 2012 2:08 PM

125 does not ask for professor input Apr 13, 2012 1:50 PM

126 n/a Apr 13, 2012 1:45 PM

127 Very mean, no respect for others Apr 13, 2012 1:36 PM


51 of 77

52 of 77

Q7. What specific recommendations (if any) do you have to improve the performance of the Administrators?

President

1 Continue to do what you are doing, YOUR JOB! Apr 27, 2012 5:59 PM

2 give everyone a raise Apr 27, 2012 2:12 PM

3 Pay disparity does not foster collegiality and cooperation among faculty and staff. Apr 27, 2012 12:49 PM

4 Be more accessible, less defensive to criticism and create a climate of innovation as oppose to fear. Apr 27, 2012 11:59 AM

5 Participation and engagement of personnel in decisionmaking Apr 27, 2012 11:26 AM

6 Overall the President is doing an outstanding job. No worries here. Apr 27, 2012 11:22 AM

7 Be more accepting of staff persons. Let the Top Managers do their duties. Apr 27, 2012 11:10 AM

8 Get rid of dead weight! Apr 26, 2012 7:29 PM

9 understand and appreciate the culture of the academy Apr 26, 2012 5:04 PM

10 Keep in mind the campus is for the students Apr 26, 2012 3:02 PM

11 more time with department heads, dept more time with administation. Apr 26, 2012 2:40 PM

12 REPLACE Apr 26, 2012 12:01 PM

13 Listen without being too defensive. Apr 26, 2012 10:51 AM

14 It is good to be aware that your grassroots people are the foundation on which this University stands. Apr 26, 2012 10:44 AM

15 Resign before he is terminated Apr 26, 2012 8:41 AM

16 Need to listen, be impartial and even handed Apr 26, 2012 7:47 AM

17 Remove the Provost Apr 25, 2012 6:31 PM

18 none Apr 25, 2012 5:47 PM

53 of 77


19 Work More Closely with Alumni and the HBCU community Apr 25, 2012 4:49 PM

20 work with faculty to achieve goals Apr 25, 2012 4:04 PM

21 Foster better attitude toward faculty/staff Apr 25, 2012 3:59 PM

22 Please see above Apr 25, 2012 3:27 PM

23 ALLOW CABINET MEMBERS TO DO THEIR JOBS Apr 25, 2012 2:59 PM

24 Focus more on helping the Students Apr 25, 2012 2:09 PM

25 Be more open and willing to embrace TSU for who she is. All of us are different and we bring differences to the table,which is what makes us a unique university, serving a unique population.

Apr 25, 2012 1:55 PM

26 Listen, learn, and share info Apr 25, 2012 9:31 AM

28 stop majoring on the minor Apr 24, 2012 3:21 PM

29 go to listening training, be avaliable to staff, students, faculty Apr 24, 2012 2:51 PM

30 To become interactive with the administrators and hold each and everyone of the accountable of their actions Apr 24, 2012 10:45 AM

31 Needs and open door policy to hear faculty, staff, & student concerns; should emphasize shared governance ofuniversity; implement a plan for recruitment, retention, and graduation of students; treat all employees with dignity andintegrity.

Apr 24, 2012 8:50 AM

32 Diversify the University. Help the colleges/schools come together to better the University Apr 23, 2012 4:54 PM

33 further strengthening of freshman & pre-freshman programs to increase both support and performance expectations Apr 23, 2012 3:12 PM


35 Terminate Apr 23, 2012 1:51 PM

37 Improve on more consensue building instead of dividing. Focus on role as president (raising money and buildingcommunity and corporate relationships. Spend less time micro managing.

Apr 23, 2012 11:08 AM

54 of 77


38 listen more; less micromanagement Apr 23, 2012 10:49 AM

39 Professional development courses. hire with/out unbias. Apr 23, 2012 8:11 AM

40 Raise funds for student scholarships/tuition subsidy, manage operations better Apr 22, 2012 4:02 PM

41 admit less qualified students to TSU Apr 22, 2012 3:27 PM

42 focus on graduation rates, stop hiring more administrators Apr 22, 2012 9:46 AM


44 Put the right people in the right positions Apr 20, 2012 4:51 PM

45 Lord knows Apr 20, 2012 4:34 PM

47 Should be removed Apr 20, 2012 3:03 PM

48 reduce adminisrative staff Apr 20, 2012 2:42 PM

49 n/a Apr 20, 2012 2:33 PM

50 Executive Directors evaluations Apr 20, 2012 2:18 PM

51 incraese the scope of programs at the university - emphasising more humanities and devloping e.g. department ofphilosophy and religious studies

Apr 20, 2012 12:51 PM

52 Find another job Apr 20, 2012 11:25 AM

53 Sensitivity Training Apr 19, 2012 4:18 PM

54 hire a vice president who can stand in for him at events and help him with fundraising and reach out to communities--religious, business, social, etc.

Apr 19, 2012 3:56 PM

55 Being more people friendly Apr 19, 2012 7:31 AM

56 Review the administrative levels created and right size the organization to reflect future focus. University is very topheavy without signficiant value being added for the additional layers. Avoid implementing policies without providing

Apr 18, 2012 5:25 PM

55 of 77


training to support the initiative. Unfortunately the results are typically superficial at best results.

57 stop surrounding himself with sycophants and begin to listen to others who tell him the truth Apr 18, 2012 3:17 PM

58 Keep a close eye on the Asso Provost Apr 18, 2012 3:02 PM

59 Termination. Apr 18, 2012 11:17 AM

60 Be more in tune with,faculty,staff and students and keeping the buildings clean- theTerry library Apr 18, 2012 10:24 AM

61 n/a Apr 18, 2012 9:48 AM

62 Input from Executive Vice President Apr 18, 2012 9:29 AM

63 Listen to faculty and adjust action and direction Apr 17, 2012 11:54 PM

64 Observe rule of "shared governance" with faculty, respond to criticism more maturaly Apr 17, 2012 9:57 PM

65 Hire Student Workers Apr 17, 2012 4:34 PM

66 Low Morale need to find a way to chagne the climate. Apr 17, 2012 3:06 PM

67 transparency Apr 17, 2012 1:02 PM

68 To be more connected with the faculty. This President is concerned about the students which he should be but Facultiesare important for the quality of the University and he totally ignores the faculty

Apr 17, 2012 10:56 AM

69 Appeal to staff more than what is currently being done Apr 17, 2012 8:42 AM

70 Go raise money; know that there are at least 2 sides to each story Apr 17, 2012 7:15 AM

71 To be removed Apr 16, 2012 5:21 PM

72 Interact more with faculty and staff Apr 16, 2012 4:08 PM

73 Be more visible with faculty, staff, & students Apr 16, 2012 3:42 PM

74 should recognize that faculty carry the University's job Apr 16, 2012 2:56 PM

56 of 77


75 n/a Apr 16, 2012 2:25 PM

76 Less isolation from faculty Apr 16, 2012 2:09 PM

77 More interaction with the faculty Apr 16, 2012 2:08 PM

78 More people with creative minds and power in his circle Apr 16, 2012 1:45 PM

79 The views of the current administration are very different from the core of TSU Apr 16, 2012 1:36 PM

80 Carefully listen to various stakeholders before acting Apr 16, 2012 1:03 PM

81 Increase the level of inclusion strategies with those in managerial and operational roles in the organization Apr 16, 2012 12:22 PM

82 Pay more attention yto mfaculty concerns Apr 16, 2012 12:11 PM

83 Restructure TSU to offer quality education. Invest resources on the faculty/teaching efforts to raise graduation rates andquality of graduates

Apr 16, 2012 12:07 PM

84 Too many tenured profs with not publications Apr 16, 2012 12:00 PM

85 Listen; assessment is essential for program improvement Apr 16, 2012 11:43 AM

86 Let the PROVOST handle research. STOP micro managing him Apr 16, 2012 11:29 AM

87 Additional staff in Student Services Apr 16, 2012 11:28 AM

88 BE VERY HELPFUL AND HAVE PATIENCE Apr 16, 2012 11:17 AM

89 give cost of living adjustment pay to improve morale Apr 16, 2012 10:54 AM

90 too many to name here; not a good fit for this position Apr 16, 2012 10:12 AM

91 Continue to be forward thinking and stay on course to rebuilding the university image. Apr 16, 2012 10:02 AM

92 Get some advice from season employees and boost their pay. Apr 16, 2012 9:13 AM

93 Improve the provost to do his job Apr 15, 2012 10:02 PM

57 of 77


95 President Rudley is two years overdue to turn his focus from outward agencies to inward functional dynamics; he needsto become readily accessible to the students he claims to want to attract and retain through graduation and to the facultymembers that they say teach, challenge and keep them here. Instead of surrounding himself with yes-men whocontinually reinscribe the old order of opaque back-scratching and top-down power-brokering, this President needs toimplement policies of regular accessibility to students and faculty, including FAIR AND EQUITABLE SALARIES,RESEARCH SUPPORT, EVENLY APPLIED TENURE AND POST-TENURE REVIEW STANDARDS, RESEARCHGRANTS, AND SABBATICALS.

Apr 14, 2012 7:31 PM

96 None. Cannot improve at this job due to lack of knowledge of academia. Should be removed and replaced with a morecompetent and qualified Professional.

Apr 14, 2012 7:26 PM

97 Needs to be removed Apr 14, 2012 7:17 PM

98 Reduce his salary to an appropriate level; implement shared governance; assign classroom teaching to your deans andassociate progosts.

Apr 14, 2012 6:07 PM

99 Listen and avoid making additional administrative and faculty changes Apr 14, 2012 4:00 PM

100 Value the faculty as key players in the improvement of TSU Apr 14, 2012 3:08 PM

101 Work to improve faculty and staff moral & salary Apr 14, 2012 1:26 PM

102 Be more communicative with faculty, engage the faculty more, create a climate where salaries are equitable Apr 14, 2012 12:01 AM

103 Change Attitude About Facultys and Staff and TSU Apr 13, 2012 10:06 PM

104 Talk with staff on campus, not just your cabinet Apr 13, 2012 8:48 PM

105 Raise some external money & get to be known Apr 13, 2012 5:19 PM

106 see #10 Apr 13, 2012 4:08 PM

107 Allow different vice presidents the levarage to provide leadership in their areas of administration for improvement in thethe student success and academic excellence

Apr 13, 2012 3:50 PM

108 respect all ideas not just you own Apr 13, 2012 3:19 PM

109 GOOD Apr 13, 2012 3:15 PM

58 of 77


110 Improve fund raising skills Apr 13, 2012 3:08 PM

111 meet with all faculty on a regular basis Apr 13, 2012 3:02 PM

112 Be more visible and interactive with faculty Apr 13, 2012 2:40 PM

113 listen more closely to needs of your faculty and staff Apr 13, 2012 2:12 PM

114 n/a Apr 13, 2012 1:45 PM

116 none Apr 13, 2012 1:30 PM

117 More visibility in the faculty ranks Apr 13, 2012 1:23 PM

Provost

1 Slow down and listen Apr 27, 2012 5:59 PM

2 same Apr 27, 2012 2:12 PM

3 Could learn to listen more to professionals and evaluate faculty members correctly. Learn to talk less and listen more andbe modest.

Apr 27, 2012 12:49 PM

4 Respect other peoples time and hire people who know what they are doing. Apr 27, 2012 11:59 AM

5 Invovement and engagement with university and community constituents Apr 27, 2012 11:26 AM

6 Overall the Provost is doing exceptionally well for academic affairs and Research at TSU. Apr 27, 2012 11:22 AM

7 To be a bit unaccepting Apr 27, 2012 11:10 AM

9 promote actions supported by faculty-based planning and governance Apr 26, 2012 5:04 PM

10 None Apr 26, 2012 3:02 PM

12 REPLACE Apr 26, 2012 12:01 PM

13 Have open door policy. Apr 26, 2012 10:51 AM

59 of 77


14 It is imperative to realize that we all breath the same air. None should feel that he is better than anyone else. Apr 26, 2012 10:44 AM

15 Seek a higher office and rely solely on his own experiences and observations Apr 26, 2012 8:41 AM

16 Need to listen, be patient and work with faculty Apr 26, 2012 7:47 AM

17 Leave immediately. He has no value to the University. He makes up rules dependent on his whim and bias. He is biasedtoward his country nationals and we are fighting a tribal fight on the

Apr 25, 2012 6:31 PM

18 none Apr 25, 2012 5:47 PM

19 Work more closely w/alumni and the HBCU community Apr 25, 2012 4:49 PM

20 Work with faculty to make them better; not ultimatums Apr 25, 2012 4:04 PM

21 Fire! Fire! Fire! (immediately) Apr 25, 2012 3:59 PM


23 CONTINUE TO STAND FOR BELIEFS AND IDEALS Apr 25, 2012 2:59 PM

24 Be more polite when communicating with individual Apr 25, 2012 2:09 PM

25 Learn TSU for yourself. Don't depend on what you heard. Apr 25, 2012 1:55 PM

26 Provide academic leadership and be consistent Apr 25, 2012 9:31 AM

27 replace Apr 24, 2012 3:45 PM

28 ask questions first, shoot later Apr 24, 2012 3:21 PM

29 lilstening training, be available tostaff, students, facultly Apr 24, 2012 2:51 PM

30 When it comes to appointing administrators in positions, make sure that they are for the students and their faculty and donot hold bias against individuals.

Apr 24, 2012 10:45 AM

31 Needs to follow rules and regulations of university; should not engage in thoughtless personal attacks on faculty; shouldlisten to faculty and student concerns and resolve issues at his level.

Apr 24, 2012 8:50 AM

60 of 77


32 N/A Apr 23, 2012 4:54 PM

33 less focus on over-elaborate assessment of students and faculty, more on support to improve quality of teaching andlearning

Apr 23, 2012 3:12 PM


35 Allow to act as Provost Apr 23, 2012 1:51 PM

36 need support/effective administrative infrastructure for faculty to do research; more respect for faculty Apr 23, 2012 11:55 AM

37 Continue to work to improve the academic process for both students and faculty. Apr 23, 2012 11:08 AM

38 listen more; acknowledge staff; include staff in events Apr 23, 2012 10:49 AM

39 Professional development courses. nepotism Apr 23, 2012 8:11 AM

40 focus attention on academic areas for success, visibility for TSU, listen to input from faculty on ways to improvepeformance of students/ graduation rates etc.

Apr 22, 2012 4:02 PM


42 be more fair minded towards faculty Apr 22, 2012 9:46 AM


44 Put the right people in the right positions. Apr 20, 2012 4:51 PM

45 N/A Apr 20, 2012 4:34 PM

46 Replacement Apr 20, 2012 3:08 PM

47 Utilize strengths of all faculty; listen to faculty Apr 20, 2012 3:03 PM

48 reduce administrative staff Apr 20, 2012 2:42 PM

49 n/a Apr 20, 2012 2:33 PM

61 of 77


50 Student evaluations Apr 20, 2012 2:18 PM

51 advertising more good work done by the faculty - emphasis on the quality of programs and quality of students we expect Apr 20, 2012 12:51 PM


53 Removal Apr 19, 2012 4:18 PM

54 assess the work assigned to his associate provosts and deans and determine if they have adequate support staff Apr 19, 2012 3:56 PM

55 Acknowledge others Apr 19, 2012 7:31 AM

56 Leadership training needed Apr 18, 2012 5:25 PM

57 stop being a sycophant Apr 18, 2012 3:17 PM

58 Look for a more experienced Asso. Apr 18, 2012 3:02 PM

59 Needs to be trained in strategic planning. Apr 18, 2012 11:17 AM

60 Listen to the Deans, Directors, faculyt, students, and staff Apr 18, 2012 10:24 AM

61 n/a Apr 18, 2012 9:48 AM

62 seek advice from others including the former Provost Apr 18, 2012 9:29 AM


64 Observe rule re: "shared governance" with faculty Apr 17, 2012 9:57 PM

65 Keep office staff, turnover is too high Apr 17, 2012 4:34 PM

66 Social Skill training Apr 17, 2012 3:06 PM

68 Provost should make the University administration a shared governance which he hasn't done so far Apr 17, 2012 10:56 AM


62 of 77


70 Learn empathy Apr 17, 2012 7:15 AM


73 N/A Apr 16, 2012 3:42 PM

74 should at least be open to meet faculty Apr 16, 2012 2:56 PM

75 n/a Apr 16, 2012 2:25 PM


77 Listen to faculty Apr 16, 2012 2:08 PM

78 Less peple without power in his circle Apr 16, 2012 1:45 PM

79 Support is not evenly distributed from this office Apr 16, 2012 1:36 PM

80 Avoid making commitments before fact finding completed Apr 16, 2012 1:03 PM

81 Increase the level of shared vision strategies with those in managerial and operational roles in the organization Apr 16, 2012 12:22 PM

82 Pay more attention to faculty concerns Apr 16, 2012 12:11 PM

83 Stop hiring administrative staff that are overpaid. Invest resources on the faculty/teaching efforts to raise graduation ratesand quality of graduates

Apr 16, 2012 12:07 PM

84 Promote the post tenure review model. Apr 16, 2012 12:00 PM


86 Define who you are. Increase support for research Apr 16, 2012 11:29 AM

88 ATTENTIVE AND HELPFUL Apr 16, 2012 11:17 AM

90 wrong university for this person Apr 16, 2012 10:12 AM

91 continue to improve the graduation percentage over four years. Apr 16, 2012 10:02 AM

63 of 77


93 Work harder Apr 15, 2012 10:02 PM

94 Would appreciate it if you did not condescend to the faculty when you give presentations to the faculty, especially whendiscussing research.

Apr 15, 2012 8:58 PM

95 Provost Ohia needs to be allowed (encouraged) to turn his attention from looking for money to clearing out lower-leveladministrative corruption by replacing poorly-published/non-productive chairs and deans with widely published/highlyproductive chairs and deans whose student evaluations demonstrate that they are demanding and effective instructors inthe classroom. Productive and published faculty attract high-achieving students, and effective instructors keep themengaged, but such professors may be routinely harassed and driven out of TSU by low-producing chairs and deans andtheir close circle of insider faculty. Some departments and colleges at TSU have become toxic to African Americanwomen's educations and careers; gendered racism must be addressed, at TSU.

Apr 14, 2012 7:31 PM

96 None. Cannot improve and has demonstrated his lack of skillts in managing teaching and research skills. Shoudl beremoved and replaced with a more competitent professional.

Apr 14, 2012 7:26 PM

97 He should be fired. He won't listen. He is too full of himself. Apr 14, 2012 7:17 PM

98 Practice shared covernence, meet regularly with the faculty, listen to what they have to say. Apr 14, 2012 6:07 PM


100 Value faculty as key players in the improvement of TSU Apr 14, 2012 3:08 PM

101 Work to improve faculty & staff moral & saklary Apr 14, 2012 1:26 PM

102 Trust his employees, stop bullying people, stop mirco managing. Apr 14, 2012 12:01 AM

103 Fire Him Apr 13, 2012 10:06 PM

104 Stop hiring your friends Apr 13, 2012 8:48 PM

105 Get a back bone Apr 13, 2012 5:19 PM

106 see #10 Apr 13, 2012 4:08 PM

107 Need to firmly take charge of the academic programs, emphasizing faculty effectiveness and student responsibilities foracademic success at TSU

Apr 13, 2012 3:50 PM

64 of 77


108 be a leader Apr 13, 2012 3:19 PM

109 GOOD Apr 13, 2012 3:15 PM

111 keep providing more opportunities for professional development Apr 13, 2012 3:02 PM

112 Be more hands on Apr 13, 2012 2:40 PM


114 n/a Apr 13, 2012 1:45 PM

116 none Apr 13, 2012 1:30 PM

117 Great work Apr 13, 2012 1:23 PM

Associate Provost

1 Go back to the classroom Apr 27, 2012 5:59 PM

2 same Apr 27, 2012 2:12 PM

3 Don't know. Apr 27, 2012 12:49 PM

4 Be a little more independent. Apr 27, 2012 11:59 AM

5 Expand planning input and inclusivity Apr 27, 2012 11:26 AM

7 Understand how to work with others Apr 27, 2012 11:10 AM

9 expand administrative skills for role Apr 26, 2012 5:04 PM

10 Direct assistance to more meaningful matters Apr 26, 2012 3:02 PM

12 REPLACE Apr 26, 2012 12:01 PM

13 None Apr 26, 2012 10:51 AM

65 of 77


14 You should be approachable for all staff and faculty. Apr 26, 2012 10:44 AM

16 Need to ensure that resources for faculty devt. exists Apr 26, 2012 7:47 AM


18 none Apr 25, 2012 5:47 PM

19 Work more closely w/alumni and the HBCU community Apr 25, 2012 4:49 PM

20 Don't give up! Apr 25, 2012 4:04 PM

21 Fire and send back to U.H. Apr 25, 2012 3:59 PM


23 STAY ENTHUSIASTIC ABOUT OPPORTUNITIES AT TSU Apr 25, 2012 2:59 PM

24 Do not know who the Associate Provost id Apr 25, 2012 2:09 PM

25 This one needs to learn TSU entirely! From the ground up. Apr 25, 2012 1:55 PM

26 Find meaningful roles relative to faculty Apr 25, 2012 9:31 AM

29 go to listening training, be available to staff, students, facultly Apr 24, 2012 2:51 PM

31 Should resign from her position, as she is too manipulative. Apr 24, 2012 8:50 AM

32 N/A Apr 23, 2012 4:54 PM


35 Terminate Apr 23, 2012 1:51 PM

36 need support/effective administrative infrastructure for faculty to do research Apr 23, 2012 11:55 AM

37 Take some courses on administrating, leadership, and decision making. Apr 23, 2012 11:08 AM

66 of 77


38 not sure of her role Apr 23, 2012 10:49 AM

39 Professonal development courses. nepotism Apr 23, 2012 8:11 AM

40 She needs to learn to be more democratice in handling committees Apr 22, 2012 4:02 PM


42 Tell us what your role is? Apr 22, 2012 9:46 AM

45 N/A Apr 20, 2012 4:34 PM

47 Should be removed Apr 20, 2012 3:03 PM

48 reduce administrative staff Apr 20, 2012 2:42 PM

49 n/a Apr 20, 2012 2:33 PM

50 Student evaluations Apr 20, 2012 2:18 PM

51 emphasis on the quality of instruction and quality of expecations from students Apr 20, 2012 12:51 PM


53 None Apr 19, 2012 4:18 PM

54 She's amazingly energetic but even worker bees tire out if they don't pace themselves. Apr 19, 2012 3:56 PM

56 Clarify the function and role to the University. Provide more substantive function than currently doing. Apr 18, 2012 5:25 PM

57 stop being a sycophant Apr 18, 2012 3:17 PM

58 Inexperienced for the job. Need training Apr 18, 2012 3:02 PM

59 Termination. Apr 18, 2012 11:17 AM

60 Let the faculty, staff and students know what you do. Apr 18, 2012 10:24 AM

67 of 77


61 n/a Apr 18, 2012 9:48 AM

62 stop being a crook Apr 18, 2012 9:29 AM


65 Hire more help Apr 17, 2012 4:34 PM

66 Associate Provost for Research position should be open to a national search and hire an external person. Apr 17, 2012 3:06 PM

68 Faculties should be consulted before the decisions are made Apr 17, 2012 10:56 AM


70 Stop placing your words in the ears of the provost and president Apr 17, 2012 7:15 AM


72 Not visible enough Apr 16, 2012 4:08 PM

73 N/A Apr 16, 2012 3:42 PM

74 should not recommend that faculty pay for themselves to go to professional conferences. Apr 16, 2012 2:56 PM

75 n/a Apr 16, 2012 2:25 PM


77 Listen to faculty Apr 16, 2012 2:08 PM

78 More power Apr 16, 2012 1:45 PM

79 N/A Apr 16, 2012 1:36 PM

80 Participate in development activities that will position the associate provost to become a provost Apr 16, 2012 1:03 PM

81 Increase the level of team building strategies with those in managerial and operational roles in the organization Apr 16, 2012 12:22 PM

68 of 77


82 None Apr 16, 2012 12:11 PM

83 Assist provost in providing appropriate faculty development and articulating policies that can translate to quality graduatesfrom TSU

Apr 16, 2012 12:07 PM


86 Increase your support for research Apr 16, 2012 11:29 AM

88 NONE Apr 16, 2012 11:17 AM

90 not strong enough for this postion. Apr 16, 2012 10:12 AM

91 continue it improve the graduation rate over four years. Apr 16, 2012 10:02 AM

93 Worker harder Apr 15, 2012 10:02 PM

94 Keep up the good work! Apr 15, 2012 8:58 PM

95 The Associate Provost needs to be given a mandate to implement bottom-up cooperative and communicative strategiesto attract and retain motivated students and effective faculty, rather than carrying on the counterproductive top-downoutdated focus of money, authority, and decision-making power that continues to cripple TSU's students and productivefaculty.

Apr 14, 2012 7:31 PM

96 None. Which Apr 14, 2012 7:26 PM

97 If she can free herself from too much mentioning of the Provost, she could be more effective. Apr 14, 2012 7:17 PM

98 Trach at least one course a semester--preferably a entey level course Apr 14, 2012 6:07 PM


100 Value faculty as key players in the improvement of TSU Apr 14, 2012 3:08 PM

101 Work to improve faculty & staff moral & salary Apr 14, 2012 1:26 PM

103 Send To Class Room Duties Apr 13, 2012 10:06 PM

69 of 77


105 Allow people to serve in their committee roles as chair and such without being overbearing and taking over Apr 13, 2012 5:19 PM

106 see #10 Apr 13, 2012 4:08 PM

107 More progressive in helping the provost implement academic and research success a TSU Apr 13, 2012 3:50 PM

108 allow others to chair some committees & initiatives Apr 13, 2012 3:19 PM

109 GOOD Apr 13, 2012 3:15 PM

111 keep providing more opportunities for professional development Apr 13, 2012 3:02 PM

112 Be more hands on Apr 13, 2012 2:40 PM


114 n/a Apr 13, 2012 1:45 PM

115 replace Apr 13, 2012 1:36 PM

116 none Apr 13, 2012 1:30 PM

117 Great work Apr 13, 2012 1:23 PM

70 of 77

71 of 77

Q10. Additionl comments/suggestions.

1 Let's give someone else an opportunity to work as Provost and Associate Provost; KEEP the President because he hasREALLY turned this SHIP AROUND!! GREAT JOB MR. PRESIDENT, in spite of your detractors! Be encouragedbecause you have done an EXCELLENT job to date!!!

Apr 27, 2012 5:59 PM

2 More employees need to treat students with respect. Apr 27, 2012 4:08 PM

3 n\a Apr 27, 2012 2:12 PM

4 President Rudley needs to get a better team around him and carefully evaluate personnel his team hires. For instance,Dr. Nyafene is clueless in respect to how to perform his job. The president and his team is not willing to cultivate arelationship with the alumni, community, staff and students. They are very dismissive of the four stakeholders.

Apr 27, 2012 11:59 AM

5 Utilize the talents,knowledge and skills of the faculty before seeking advice from external consultants... Apr 27, 2012 11:26 AM

6 More unification of employees. Apr 27, 2012 11:10 AM

7 The way the current system is setup it sets up bottlenecks in terms of decision making as instead of delegating authorityto capable individuals it is instead depedendant on a few individuals which causes delays as it has to make it all the wayup the chain where if that person is unavailable it can take days or longer before an issue is taken care of.

Apr 27, 2012 11:02 AM

8 none Apr 26, 2012 2:40 PM

9 This institution is in need of strong, honest, and intelligent leadership. It has not had this, and the TSU mission isundermined by the people at the top. TSU needs an overhaul, or at the very least, TSU needs to terminate employeeswho cause trouble for TSU and the university's reputation. There are far too many unqualified people at TSU and it isdragging TSU down. The good people should be recognized, and the bad should be terminated. TSU owes this to itsstudents and to the State of Texas.

Apr 26, 2012 8:41 AM

10 TSU need to spend more on faculty development and incentivize serious faculty members to do more. Apr 26, 2012 7:47 AM

11 A happy employee is a good employee. Adminstration need to concentrate on putting out a better product, that can sellitself and creat better customer service amongst the entire universtiy

Apr 25, 2012 4:49 PM

12 I believe the vision the current administration has for TSU is admirable and, I believe this administration can achievethose goals, as long as they get faculty buy in. But, as long as they just tell faculty that faculty are no good, improvementswill not happen.

Apr 25, 2012 4:04 PM

13 I think I've covered everything. Apr 25, 2012 3:27 PM

72 of 77


14 Great Job Administrators! TSU is a better place and well accepted in the community. Apr 25, 2012 3:02 PM

15 Working conditions for faculty should be a priority. Apr 25, 2012 2:36 PM

16 Unfortunately, Dr. Rudley has created for himself more trouble than he envisioned. I believe that his intentions may havebeen in the right place, but the underlying motives of those he brought along did not match. When the new administrationarrived they did not find us standing hopeless and without a future. What they found was a flourishing university, withstudents eager to learn and Faculty willing to train them and broaden their thinking capacity. What they found was athriving ground of "Excellence In Achievement". Our heads may have been bowed, but that was only because we are acommunity of great thinkers and we were thinking of our next big contribution to the world! Make no mistake about it,TSU will make it through!

Apr 25, 2012 1:55 PM

17 It is advise that the administrators in leadership roles become active within the university. There should be individuals putin positions that are for the students and care about their well-being and success. For TSU to be a prestigous university,the students are not receiving a prestigous education and the faculty and administration has yet improved the graduationrate. Departments within the university are handing out grades and not students who are graduating are left withoutcareers because there is not enough staff, faculty, and administrators who have the passion for young black students tomeet the expectations of the world.

Apr 24, 2012 10:45 AM

18 Administrators should treat faculty, staff & students with the highest respect and regard. Should not hire high-dollaradministrators and keep salaries of faculty and staff low to pay the administrators. Should not punish and/or terminatefaculty/staff unnecessarily. Should encourage, by example, all employees and students to work as a team to improveand advance the university. Should release information to faculty and staff instead of forwarding it through the deans andchairs (that do not reveal it).

Apr 24, 2012 8:50 AM

19 None Apr 23, 2012 4:54 PM

20 Rudley's administration has brought more intense focus on improving performance of incoming students than anypredecessor I can recall--good. I'd like him to continue exploring and experimenting to improve student learning in thefirst 2 years.

Apr 23, 2012 3:12 PM

21 There is racism in full form full effect in COST sactuoned by the Provost. Recall how Africa was taken over by Arab, Euro,Dutch, etc., So be TSU

Apr 23, 2012 2:19 PM

22 None at this time. Apr 23, 2012 2:09 PM

23 need to get leaders with a vested interest in success of TSU---alumnus should be President Apr 23, 2012 10:49 AM

73 of 77


24 new administration which will stand for TSU, not against TSU. "Excellence with Achievement". Apr 23, 2012 8:11 AM

25 The focus should be on afforable public education for the students- whcih means a tighter control of funds being used foradministrative purposes.

Apr 22, 2012 4:02 PM

26 This team was brought up to improve TSU graduation rate and recruitment. None of this has been done. They must go. Apr 22, 2012 9:46 AM

27 N/A Apr 20, 2012 4:34 PM

28 I was unable to answer any of the queations, I do not come in contact with these poeple. Apr 20, 2012 3:44 PM

29 The University's Board of Regents, the Office of General Counsel, the Office of Research, TSU Police Department, andthe Office of Internal Audit must start immediate and thorough investigations over the President's fraudulently andintentionally committing five million dollar university matching fund to NASA URC Program's renewal application in orderfor his personal political gains in 2008. The NASA URC Program's renewal application, which is a total mess now, wouldnot have been funded in 2008 if the president didn't make the 5-million dollar commitment to NASA, which he knows hehas no way to pay. Now the entire program is being scrutinized by NASA, including this very important 5-million dollarmatching fund commitment, which places the University in a very dangerous and embarrassing situation and clearlydemonstrates his complete incompetency in his position.

Apr 20, 2012 3:23 PM

30 Administration should utilize strengths of faculty and institution and not operate under the erroneous assumption thateverything outside the university is better than what exists within. It is insulting to comment that our university looks like aprison and that our students come from the ghetto. Persons with these attitudes should not be in positions of decisionmaking at Texas Southern University.

Apr 20, 2012 3:03 PM

31 gET SALARY ADJUSTMENT TAKEN CARE OF NOW EFFECTIVE FALL SEMESTER Apr 20, 2012 2:42 PM

32 I do not think the questions are really adequate to evluate adminsdtartors. E.g. we do not need "mentoring" fromadministrators, we do not need reguators to tell us hwo to do things; we need administartors who would strive forexcelelnce themselves and excellent performance of students, who would demand such performance from students,take care of fcaulty salaries, would decrease their own salaries, would decrease number of administartive positions(mauch too high), etc, etc.

Apr 20, 2012 12:51 PM

33 They just seem to just not care! Apr 20, 2012 11:25 AM

34 The administration is stuck in a pattern of management in chaos. Too many changes, too often, and the lack of requisiteskill sets to build effective leadership across the campus. Faculty are devalued by the President who sets the tone for theuniversity.

Apr 19, 2012 4:18 PM

74 of 77


35 TSU is better because of these administrators but we need for them to do more, mainly listen more carefully to facultyconcerns.

Apr 19, 2012 3:56 PM

36 Take down the iron fences, stop reducing parking space, raise pay, fight for more remediation, do not punish faculty whenstudents make false claims on favuilty evaluations that can be disproven, modify the faculty evaluation instrument to putmore emphasis on teaching and reward it with pay increases, reduce class sizes, bring back open enrollment, put a stopto frivolous grievance procedures against faculty and enforce probation and suspension rules when students do wrong,

Apr 19, 2012 2:29 PM

37 There should be a rule that Department Chairs must receive signature from the faculty before submitting the courseteaching schedule to the registrar's office.

Apr 19, 2012 1:27 PM

38 Develop listening sessions, so the Administrators can gain information about problems at the University that rarely if evermake it up to the highest levels. Remove the climate of fear for speaking out regarding the inequalities andineffectiveness of units, departments and colleges/schools.

Apr 18, 2012 5:25 PM

39 This President lacks vision. Sad to say!. He does not listen to others and he runs this university on fear! Apr 18, 2012 3:17 PM

40 This administration has done a very ineffective job of analyzing the market before making ridiculous, rash commitments(e.g., Northwest campus, Weekend College). Also, their negotiation skills are pathetic and have gotten TSU on the hookfor financial obligations that were completely unnecessary (e.g., Tom Joyner HBCU's Online initiative). For these twomissteps alone, they should all be terminated.

Apr 18, 2012 11:17 AM

41 meet with the faculty and staff mor often and listen to their points of view and follow through./ Apr 18, 2012 10:24 AM

42 I don't feel like I have enough information about the administors to fill out a survey, but I do know that the president isdoing a wonderful job in recruiting students. I do know from reading and observing that is leadership is the best.

Apr 18, 2012 10:13 AM

43 n/a Apr 18, 2012 9:48 AM

44 Question 10 has a typo, Additional needs the second a Apr 17, 2012 4:34 PM

45 Evaluate poor performing faculty and eliminate or forced retirement of faculty that are unable to perform or unwilling toperform their job. Eliminate one stop registration and allow students to be adults as they are at every other college in theUnited States and register themselves; this puts a strain on staff because faculty are unwilling to advise and travel to thegym. Give appropriate raises to staff who have never had one. Look at departments that are under-staffed and increaseworkforce. Lessen departments that are over-staffed. Properly evaluate staff who are seeking promotion or transfer toother areas; or who are applying to become faculty but are overlooked because of co-existing relationships of hiringcommittees. Offer a staff assessor position of all programs on campus

Apr 17, 2012 8:42 AM

75 of 77


46 The prison inside is now more evident with the fence on the outside. This was yet another way to remove TSU from thecommunity. shared governance here is a farce. Sad.

Apr 17, 2012 7:15 AM

47 Send them back to U of H Apr 16, 2012 5:21 PM

48 There are more positive actions and a better environment than any other time during my 2 decades on campus Apr 16, 2012 3:49 PM

49 Administrators job is, well, to administer, but they tend to forget that without faculty there would be nothing for them toadminister.

Apr 16, 2012 2:56 PM

50 n/a Apr 16, 2012 2:25 PM

51 Retention and Graduation should be the focus Apr 16, 2012 2:09 PM

52 Thank you. Apr 16, 2012 1:45 PM

53 The current administration does not care about the needs of University as a whole, therefore they do not care about thestudents, staff, faculty and so forth. The current administration is focused on hurting those who produce and have aopinion. This is a place of higher learning where we should all come together for the common good of our constituents,but this administration does not value who we are, where we came from ,and where we should strive to be. The entireadministration thrives on silencing those who have ideas and who could possible catapult us into the realm that weshould rightfully be in because they may not want that specific person to be a part of the infamous "click." If I remembercorrectly our current administration stated they would not allow that type of separatism to occur, but now the atmospherefrom Scott to Elgin shows without a doubt that this is the worst and lowest point TSU has been in moral wise ever...

Apr 16, 2012 1:36 PM

54 None Apr 16, 2012 12:11 PM

55 The administration at TSU is blotted, overpaid, and self-aggrandizing. Is it possible to get administrators who care aboutstudents--not graduating after 6,7,8, years with degrees that are not translatable into credible employment and non-minimal pay jobs? Enforce equitable pay raises not the current system of rewarding 'friends' and/or sycophants. Somefaculty pay (like this one) froze or declined in real terms even though the administration claims 'merit' faculty pay raiseswith some as high as 20+% and more new administrative staff hires. Put resources on faculty and teaching efforts so wecan do a credible job for graduates who can compete in the global employment market.

Apr 16, 2012 12:07 PM

56 Salaries of female faculty should ben on par with males. Lilly Ledbetter law requires it. Apr 16, 2012 12:00 PM

57 Let some employees with Master Degree's teach orientation classes. With a supplement salary. Apr 16, 2012 9:13 AM

76 of 77


58 I think this survey is a really good way to get faculty input using an anonymous feedback that is convenient for the faculty. Apr 15, 2012 8:58 PM

59 These administrators have all the qualities of high intelligence, determination, thoroughness, and steadfastness ofpurpose necessary to revolutionize TSU's environment and success statistics. What is needed, at this point, is thecourage to dismiss tail-chasing, self-defeating arguments and the self-serving administrators who cannibalize TSU'sresources while making excuses for their own low performance. It is time to implement best practices borrowed as-isfrom more successful institutions, and to clear out lower-level administrators whose croneyistic practices beat downdynamic and productive faculty members who could make progressive, student-attracting and student-retaining policieswork. As for the gendered racism that has entrenched itself as effective policy in some departments: an environmentthat is dangerous for African American women faculty members is obviously also detrimental to the success of AfricanAmerican women students; token graduation rates will not save this university.

Apr 14, 2012 7:31 PM

60 This adnministration is curropt and should be investigated. For example, the Provost's roommate in college. Dr. Momoh's150% salary payment and Dr. Oyekan's and Ohis plots to move money from TSU to Nigeria.

Apr 14, 2012 7:26 PM

61 There should an overhaul and a change in the administration. We don't need all of them to come from U of H. Apr 14, 2012 7:17 PM

62 We need an administration that recognizes the centrality of the faculty to the success and reputation of the university, andrecognizes that its role is the provide the faculty with the resources they need to function effectively.

Apr 14, 2012 6:07 PM

63 This adminisitration has done much to improve TSU; I hope they continue with a focus on improving academicperformance.

Apr 14, 2012 3:08 PM

64 The administration needs to be more transparent and equitable as it concerns salaries. Apr 14, 2012 12:01 AM

65 Thanks for taking the time to allow us to post our concerns. Apr 13, 2012 10:06 PM

66 reactive vs proactice practices, reality vs perception of University (ok to target higher caliber students but don't forgetcore), allow for more student accountability (education not solely measured in a degree-assist in life/career choices andgrowth), become more innovative to meet the needs of a more technical global market (increase online delivery and non-traditional learning methods), promote better relationships with alumni, staff and faculty, upgrade/develop campusfacilities, improve services on campus not off, mandate employee development/training

Apr 13, 2012 4:08 PM

67 There need to be equity in faculty salary. Apr 13, 2012 3:50 PM

68 I feel that I can invest my time and effort in TSU under this administration. My suggestion is that they should go out andseek for large donations from the alumni to improve the school's fiscal and academic image.

Apr 13, 2012 3:08 PM

77 of 77


69 You have 3 different associate provosts at TSU-my comments refer to Associte Provost of Research Apr 13, 2012 2:12 PM

70 One HUGE problem on this campus is in how the administration chooses to ignore 1) the treatment of students by TSUstaff, particularly those in service positions 2) the high rate of absenteeism among the staff that continues to gounchecked

Apr 13, 2012 2:08 PM

71 It would be nice to have a more open dialogue with administrators. I do not need a self appointed representative tellingme that they can talk to the President, etc. for me.

Apr 13, 2012 2:00 PM

texas southern university faculty evaluation of the

Documents