test report - reynaers aluminium€¦ · 4.2.2 test with repeated pressure and under pressure 4.2.3...
TRANSCRIPT
2
TEST REPORT
Report number
Date of test
Date report
Applicant
Belgium
Project number TC 14_137
applicant
Size report This report consists of 15 pages (including appendices)
Subject Determination of the
● Air permeability according EN 1026
● Watertightness according EN 1027
● Resistance to wind load according EN 12211
Inspector P. Scheerman
Technical manager ir. J.T. Boersma
Conclusion The double leaf door of Reynaers Class
meets the classification as hereby mentioned:
● Air permeability according EN 12207 2
● Watertightness according EN 12208 6A
● Resistance to wind load according EN 12210 C2
15.00081
23 January 2015
09 March 2015
Reynaers Aluminium N.V.
Oude Liersebaan 266
B-2570 Duffel
of an aluminium , inwards opening double leaf door with sizes W x H: 2780 x 2410
mm, constructed from the profile system: Reynaers CS 77
Report: issued on
CONTENT
1. PURPOSE OF THE TEST
2. METHOD OF INVESTIGATION
3. CONSTRUCTION TESTED
4. OBSERVATIONS AND RESULTS
4.1 Air permeability
4.2 Resistance to wind load
4.3 Watertightness
4.4 Strength test
5. CLASSIFICATION
APPENDICES
6.1 APPENDIX 1 Photos of the tested construction
6.2 APPENDIX 2 Drawings of the tested construction
09 March 201515.00081
Blad 2 van 15
Report: issued on
1. PURPOSE OF THE TEST
Air permeability
Watertightness
Resistance to wind load
of the door according the relevant European Standards.
The test are performed as an Initial Type Testing (ITT) based on EN 14351-1:2006+A1: 2010
SKG is Notified Body (NB 0960) for certifying and testing doors and windows.
2. METHOD OF INVESTIGATION
The door was delivered for testing on:
The double leaf door was produced by and at the adress of the applicant
SKG has verified all details of the construction with reference to the supplied drawings.
The door was placed in the test rig and tested for:
Air permeability
Test according:
EN 1026:2000 Windows and Doors - Air permeability - Test method
Classification according:
EN 12207:1999 Windows and Doors - Air permeability - Classification
Watertightness
Test according:
EN 1027:2000 Windows and Doors - Watertightness - Test method
Classification according:
EN 12208:1999 Windows and Doors - Watertightness - Classification
Resistance to wind load
Test according:
EN 12211:2000 Windows and Doors - Resistance to wind load - Test method
Classification according:
EN 12210:1999/C1:2002 Windows and Doors - Resistance to wind load - Classification
The test was performed with the measuring equipment and test rig of:
on the location:
SKG has verified and approved the calibration status of the equipment.
The last calibration date was:
> The ambient temperature during the test was approx. : 17 ºC
> The air pressure was approx. 1028 hPa
> The air humidity was approx. 33 %
It was determined that before the tests the element functioned normally.
23 January 2015
09 March 2015
Duffel
SKG was ordered by Reynaers - Duffel to perform various tests on a double leaf door, to classify
the
15.00081
Reynaers Aluminium N.V.
01 July 2014
Blad 3 van 15
Report: issued on
3. CONSTRUCTION TESTED
The double leaf door was produced with profile system:
Drawings of the double leaf door were received and are appended to this report (Appendix 2)
Technical specification:
Construction: Nr Description
Frame Profile
Leaf Profile
Profile gasket
End piece side
Mullion
Sill
Glazing bead
Insulation glass
Butt strips:
Gasket inside
Gasket outside
Gasket outside
Glazing gaskets:
Inner glazing gasket
Outer glazing gasket
Decompression
Multipointlock
number of locking points 5
Hinges 8
Door handle
Drainage leave 2 x 3
Drainage sill 6
#N/B
5 x 25 mm
Fapim Horus 061.7229.xx
8 x 34 mm
Dr. Hahn Tuerband 4 065.6656.xx
Fuhr MX4022P8NJ 061.8136.ZC
080.9124.sy
080.9114.sy
080.9078.04
080.9040.04
Semco Therm Low U: 6 - 15 - 6 mm
080.9240.04
Reynaers CS 77
09 March 201515.00081
008.2873.XX
030.3614.XX
008.2026.XX
008.2015.XX
Article nr.
008.1898.XX
108.0080.xx
069.8370.04
Blad 4 van 15
Report: issued on
4. OBSERVATIONS AND RESULTS
4.1 Air permeability
For the calculation of the normalized air flow the measured value is adjusted by: 1,025
(according section 8.1 of EN 1026)
at positive pressure at negative pressure Average
m3/h m
3/hm
1m
3/hm
2m
3/h m
3/hm
1m
3/hm
2m
3/hm
1m
3/hm
2
6,71 0,45 1,00 6,23 0,42 0,93 0,44 0,97
9,79 0,66 1,46 9,20 0,62 1,37 0,64 1,42
12,49 0,84 1,86 11,33 0,76 1,69 0,80 1,78
15,82 1,06 2,36 12,96 0,87 1,93 0,97 2,15
22,95 1,54 3,42 14,75 0,99 2,20 1,27 2,81
44,75 3,01 6,68 16,15 1,09 2,41 2,05 4,55
127,44 8,58 19,02 19,26 1,30 2,87 4,94 10,95
228,56 15,38 34,11 22,23 1,50 3,32 8,44 18,72
Result:
● Air permeability based on length of joint Class 2
● Air permeability based on overall area Class 2
09 March 2015
Pressure in Pa
The results of the air permeability measurements per m¹ joint and per m² surface are shown in table and
graph below.
250
150
200
The joint lenght of the door was 14,86 m¹ and the surface was 6,7 m²
15.00081
50
100
450
600
300
0,1
1
10
100
10 100 1000
m3/h.m1
m3/h.m2
0.25
25,00
150 300 450
m3/h.m1 m3/h.m2
Pa 600
2,50
50
1
2
3
4
Blad 5 van 15
Report: issued on
4.2 Resistance to wind load
4.2.1 Test on bending Designload P1: 800 Pa
Classification according: EN 12210 C2
The tables show the bending in response to various key pressures.
Note:
Class A B C
Mullion 1 L= 2350 1/150xL 1/200xL 1/300xL
Maximum allowable bending f in mm (max.=15): 15,67 11,75 7,83
Positive pressure Negative pressure
V2 V3 V1 V2 V3
0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00
3,17 2,48 0,88 2,96 3,47
6,24 5,25 2,09 5,62 4,15
9,91 8,33 2,58 8,04 4,53
12,26 10,07 2,93 10,42 4,92
0,06 0,12 0,20 0,35 0,28
Result:
The maximum bending at wind resistance design load is: 6,50 mm
Grade of bending C
Class A B C
Horizontal transom 2L= 1/150xL 1/200xL 1/300xL
Maximum allowable bending f in mm (max.=15):
Positive pressure Negative pressure
V2 V3 V1 V2 V3
0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00
0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00
Result:
The maximum bending at wind resistance design load is: 0,00 mm
Grade of bending NPD
Class A B C
Horizontal transom 3L 1/150xL 1/200xL 1/300xL
Maximum allowable bending f in mm (max.=15):
Positive pressure Negative pressure
V2 V3 V1 V2 V3
Result:
The maximum bending at wind resistance design load is: 0,00 mm
Grade of bending NPD
0
5,06
5,94
0,08
0,00 -800
0,00
200
400 0,00 -400
0,11
f
600 0,00 -600
Pressure in Pa V1 f Pressure in Pa
0,00 -200 0,00
f
0 0,00
0,00
09 March 201515.00081
Pressure in Pa
The position of the displacement devices (V1. V2 en V3) is shown in the elevation drawing of the
tested construction (see annex 2).
f fPressure in Pa V1
0,00 -200
-0,04
Pressure in Pa V1
0,00
1,15
2,09
-200
-400
0,00
0,79
0,00
0,00
0 0,00 0,00 0 0,00
800
2,50
-800
3,22
0 0,00 0,00 0 0,00
0,00
4,49
6,50
0
f Pressure in Pa
600
0
200
400
0
200
0,00
1,57
3,06
800 4,26
-600
0
0,00 0
-800 0,00
600 0,00 -600 0,00
800 0,00
400 0,00 -400 0,00
0,000
Blad 6 van 15
Report: issued on
4.2.2 Test with repeated pressure and under pressure
4.2.3 Repeated test for air permeability
After the tests were performed as described under 4.2.1 and 4.2.2 above the air permeability test was repeated.
at positive pressure at negative pressure Average
m3/h m
3/hm
1m
3/hm
2m
3/h m
3/hm
1m
3/hm
2m
3/hm
1m
3/hm
2
6,74 0,45 1,01 6,38 0,43 0,95 0,44 0,98
10,07 0,68 1,50 9,37 0,63 1,40 0,65 1,45
13,49 0,91 2,01 11,45 0,77 1,71 0,84 1,86
20,60 1,39 3,07 13,39 0,90 2,00 1,14 2,54
38,47 2,59 5,74 15,07 1,01 2,25 1,80 4,00
62,08 4,18 9,27 16,25 1,09 2,43 2,64 5,85
149,08 10,03 22,25 19,24 1,30 2,87 5,66 12,56
255,09 17,17 38,07 21,84 1,47 3,26 9,32 20,67
The air permeability was less than maximum allowed.
100
200
250
300
450
15.00081 09 March 2015
Pressure in Pa
150
600
50
It was established that the tested construction did not show any signs of distortion.
The results of the air permeability measurements are shown in table and graph below.
The requirement is that the air permeability the maximum air flow belonging to the class of air
permeability as determined by the first test doesn’t exceed by more than 20% (dotted line).
The door was loaded 50 times with respectively a positive and a negative key pressure P2 of 50%
of the design load. The construction was loaded during approx. 7 sec. with both the negative and
the positive key pressure.
0,1
1
10
100
10 100 1000
m3/h.m1 m3/h.m2
0.25
25,00
150 300 450
m3/h.m1 m3/h.m2
Pa 600
2,50
50
1
2
3
4
Blad 7 van 15
Report: issued on
4.3 Watertightness
The results of the water tightness test are shown in table below.
Note:
The amount of water in liters / h used for spraying the construction was: 840 L/hMethod 1A
Result:
Pa
4.4 Strength test
Pa
It was established that the door did not show any signs of distortion.
no
no
no
5 no
Pressure in Pa
0
50
100
150
t (min).
The door was watertight up to a pressure of: 250
The door was loaded to a positive and a negative key pressure P3 of: 1200
Water leakage
no
no
15.00081
250 5
09 March 2015
200
15
5
5
5
Blad 8 van 15
Report: issued on
5. CLASSIFICATION
Air permeability based on length of joint 2
Air permeability based on overall area 2
Air permeability 2
Resistance to wind load C2
Watertightness 6A
Drawn up at Wageningen on:
ir. J.T. Boersma
Technical Manager
Class
15.00081 09 March 2015
09 March 2015
This report may only be reproduced word by word and in its entirety, unless prior written permission has
been obtained from SKG
Blad 9 van 15
Report: APPENDICES issued on
6.1 APPENDIX 1 Photos of the tested construction
15.00081 09 March 2015
Blad 10 van 15
Report: APPENDICES issued on
6.2 APPENDIX 2 Drawings of the tested construction
15.00081 09 March 2015
V1
V2
V3
Blad 11 van 15
Report: APPENDICES issued on 15.00081 09 March 2015
Blad 12 van 15
Report: APPENDICES issued on 15.00081 09 March 2015
Blad 13 van 15
Report: APPENDICES issued on 15.00081 09 March 2015
Blad 14 van 15
Report: 15.00081 APPENDICES issued on #####
Blad 15 van 15