test report - reynaers aluminium€¦ · 4.2.2 test with repeated pressure and under pressure 4.2.3...

15
2 TEST REPORT Report number Date of test Date report Applicant Belgium Project number TC 14_137 applicant Size report This report consists of 15 pages (including appendices) Subject Determination of the Air permeability according EN 1026 Watertightness according EN 1027 Resistance to wind load according EN 12211 Inspector P. Scheerman Technical manager ir. J.T. Boersma Conclusion The double leaf door of Reynaers Class meets the classification as hereby mentioned: Air permeability according EN 12207 2 Watertightness according EN 12208 6A Resistance to wind load according EN 12210 C2 15.00081 23 January 2015 09 March 2015 Reynaers Aluminium N.V. Oude Liersebaan 266 B-2570 Duffel of an aluminium , inwards opening double leaf door with sizes W x H: 2780 x 2410 mm, constructed from the profile system: Reynaers CS 77

Upload: others

Post on 18-Nov-2020

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: TEST REPORT - Reynaers Aluminium€¦ · 4.2.2 Test with repeated pressure and under pressure 4.2.3 Repeated test for air permeability After the tests were performed as described

2

TEST REPORT

Report number

Date of test

Date report

Applicant

Belgium

Project number TC 14_137

applicant

Size report This report consists of 15 pages (including appendices)

Subject Determination of the

● Air permeability according EN 1026

● Watertightness according EN 1027

● Resistance to wind load according EN 12211

Inspector P. Scheerman

Technical manager ir. J.T. Boersma

Conclusion The double leaf door of Reynaers Class

meets the classification as hereby mentioned:

● Air permeability according EN 12207 2

● Watertightness according EN 12208 6A

● Resistance to wind load according EN 12210 C2

15.00081

23 January 2015

09 March 2015

Reynaers Aluminium N.V.

Oude Liersebaan 266

B-2570 Duffel

of an aluminium , inwards opening double leaf door with sizes W x H: 2780 x 2410

mm, constructed from the profile system: Reynaers CS 77

Page 2: TEST REPORT - Reynaers Aluminium€¦ · 4.2.2 Test with repeated pressure and under pressure 4.2.3 Repeated test for air permeability After the tests were performed as described

Report: issued on

CONTENT

1. PURPOSE OF THE TEST

2. METHOD OF INVESTIGATION

3. CONSTRUCTION TESTED

4. OBSERVATIONS AND RESULTS

4.1 Air permeability

4.2 Resistance to wind load

4.3 Watertightness

4.4 Strength test

5. CLASSIFICATION

APPENDICES

6.1 APPENDIX 1 Photos of the tested construction

6.2 APPENDIX 2 Drawings of the tested construction

09 March 201515.00081

Blad 2 van 15

Page 3: TEST REPORT - Reynaers Aluminium€¦ · 4.2.2 Test with repeated pressure and under pressure 4.2.3 Repeated test for air permeability After the tests were performed as described

Report: issued on

1. PURPOSE OF THE TEST

Air permeability

Watertightness

Resistance to wind load

of the door according the relevant European Standards.

The test are performed as an Initial Type Testing (ITT) based on EN 14351-1:2006+A1: 2010

SKG is Notified Body (NB 0960) for certifying and testing doors and windows.

2. METHOD OF INVESTIGATION

The door was delivered for testing on:

The double leaf door was produced by and at the adress of the applicant

SKG has verified all details of the construction with reference to the supplied drawings.

The door was placed in the test rig and tested for:

Air permeability

Test according:

EN 1026:2000 Windows and Doors - Air permeability - Test method

Classification according:

EN 12207:1999 Windows and Doors - Air permeability - Classification

Watertightness

Test according:

EN 1027:2000 Windows and Doors - Watertightness - Test method

Classification according:

EN 12208:1999 Windows and Doors - Watertightness - Classification

Resistance to wind load

Test according:

EN 12211:2000 Windows and Doors - Resistance to wind load - Test method

Classification according:

EN 12210:1999/C1:2002 Windows and Doors - Resistance to wind load - Classification

The test was performed with the measuring equipment and test rig of:

on the location:

SKG has verified and approved the calibration status of the equipment.

The last calibration date was:

> The ambient temperature during the test was approx. : 17 ºC

> The air pressure was approx. 1028 hPa

> The air humidity was approx. 33 %

It was determined that before the tests the element functioned normally.

23 January 2015

09 March 2015

Duffel

SKG was ordered by Reynaers - Duffel to perform various tests on a double leaf door, to classify

the

15.00081

Reynaers Aluminium N.V.

01 July 2014

Blad 3 van 15

Page 4: TEST REPORT - Reynaers Aluminium€¦ · 4.2.2 Test with repeated pressure and under pressure 4.2.3 Repeated test for air permeability After the tests were performed as described

Report: issued on

3. CONSTRUCTION TESTED

The double leaf door was produced with profile system:

Drawings of the double leaf door were received and are appended to this report (Appendix 2)

Technical specification:

Construction: Nr Description

Frame Profile

Leaf Profile

Profile gasket

End piece side

Mullion

Sill

Glazing bead

Insulation glass

Butt strips:

Gasket inside

Gasket outside

Gasket outside

Glazing gaskets:

Inner glazing gasket

Outer glazing gasket

Decompression

Multipointlock

number of locking points 5

Hinges 8

Door handle

Drainage leave 2 x 3

Drainage sill 6

#N/B

5 x 25 mm

Fapim Horus 061.7229.xx

8 x 34 mm

Dr. Hahn Tuerband 4 065.6656.xx

Fuhr MX4022P8NJ 061.8136.ZC

080.9124.sy

080.9114.sy

080.9078.04

080.9040.04

Semco Therm Low U: 6 - 15 - 6 mm

080.9240.04

Reynaers CS 77

09 March 201515.00081

008.2873.XX

030.3614.XX

008.2026.XX

008.2015.XX

Article nr.

008.1898.XX

108.0080.xx

069.8370.04

Blad 4 van 15

Page 5: TEST REPORT - Reynaers Aluminium€¦ · 4.2.2 Test with repeated pressure and under pressure 4.2.3 Repeated test for air permeability After the tests were performed as described

Report: issued on

4. OBSERVATIONS AND RESULTS

4.1 Air permeability

For the calculation of the normalized air flow the measured value is adjusted by: 1,025

(according section 8.1 of EN 1026)

at positive pressure at negative pressure Average

m3/h m

3/hm

1m

3/hm

2m

3/h m

3/hm

1m

3/hm

2m

3/hm

1m

3/hm

2

6,71 0,45 1,00 6,23 0,42 0,93 0,44 0,97

9,79 0,66 1,46 9,20 0,62 1,37 0,64 1,42

12,49 0,84 1,86 11,33 0,76 1,69 0,80 1,78

15,82 1,06 2,36 12,96 0,87 1,93 0,97 2,15

22,95 1,54 3,42 14,75 0,99 2,20 1,27 2,81

44,75 3,01 6,68 16,15 1,09 2,41 2,05 4,55

127,44 8,58 19,02 19,26 1,30 2,87 4,94 10,95

228,56 15,38 34,11 22,23 1,50 3,32 8,44 18,72

Result:

● Air permeability based on length of joint Class 2

● Air permeability based on overall area Class 2

09 March 2015

Pressure in Pa

The results of the air permeability measurements per m¹ joint and per m² surface are shown in table and

graph below.

250

150

200

The joint lenght of the door was 14,86 m¹ and the surface was 6,7 m²

15.00081

50

100

450

600

300

0,1

1

10

100

10 100 1000

m3/h.m1

m3/h.m2

0.25

25,00

150 300 450

m3/h.m1 m3/h.m2

Pa 600

2,50

50

1

2

3

4

Blad 5 van 15

Page 6: TEST REPORT - Reynaers Aluminium€¦ · 4.2.2 Test with repeated pressure and under pressure 4.2.3 Repeated test for air permeability After the tests were performed as described

Report: issued on

4.2 Resistance to wind load

4.2.1 Test on bending Designload P1: 800 Pa

Classification according: EN 12210 C2

The tables show the bending in response to various key pressures.

Note:

Class A B C

Mullion 1 L= 2350 1/150xL 1/200xL 1/300xL

Maximum allowable bending f in mm (max.=15): 15,67 11,75 7,83

Positive pressure Negative pressure

V2 V3 V1 V2 V3

0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00

3,17 2,48 0,88 2,96 3,47

6,24 5,25 2,09 5,62 4,15

9,91 8,33 2,58 8,04 4,53

12,26 10,07 2,93 10,42 4,92

0,06 0,12 0,20 0,35 0,28

Result:

The maximum bending at wind resistance design load is: 6,50 mm

Grade of bending C

Class A B C

Horizontal transom 2L= 1/150xL 1/200xL 1/300xL

Maximum allowable bending f in mm (max.=15):

Positive pressure Negative pressure

V2 V3 V1 V2 V3

0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00

0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00

Result:

The maximum bending at wind resistance design load is: 0,00 mm

Grade of bending NPD

Class A B C

Horizontal transom 3L 1/150xL 1/200xL 1/300xL

Maximum allowable bending f in mm (max.=15):

Positive pressure Negative pressure

V2 V3 V1 V2 V3

Result:

The maximum bending at wind resistance design load is: 0,00 mm

Grade of bending NPD

0

5,06

5,94

0,08

0,00 -800

0,00

200

400 0,00 -400

0,11

f

600 0,00 -600

Pressure in Pa V1 f Pressure in Pa

0,00 -200 0,00

f

0 0,00

0,00

09 March 201515.00081

Pressure in Pa

The position of the displacement devices (V1. V2 en V3) is shown in the elevation drawing of the

tested construction (see annex 2).

f fPressure in Pa V1

0,00 -200

-0,04

Pressure in Pa V1

0,00

1,15

2,09

-200

-400

0,00

0,79

0,00

0,00

0 0,00 0,00 0 0,00

800

2,50

-800

3,22

0 0,00 0,00 0 0,00

0,00

4,49

6,50

0

f Pressure in Pa

600

0

200

400

0

200

0,00

1,57

3,06

800 4,26

-600

0

0,00 0

-800 0,00

600 0,00 -600 0,00

800 0,00

400 0,00 -400 0,00

0,000

Blad 6 van 15

Page 7: TEST REPORT - Reynaers Aluminium€¦ · 4.2.2 Test with repeated pressure and under pressure 4.2.3 Repeated test for air permeability After the tests were performed as described

Report: issued on

4.2.2 Test with repeated pressure and under pressure

4.2.3 Repeated test for air permeability

After the tests were performed as described under 4.2.1 and 4.2.2 above the air permeability test was repeated.

at positive pressure at negative pressure Average

m3/h m

3/hm

1m

3/hm

2m

3/h m

3/hm

1m

3/hm

2m

3/hm

1m

3/hm

2

6,74 0,45 1,01 6,38 0,43 0,95 0,44 0,98

10,07 0,68 1,50 9,37 0,63 1,40 0,65 1,45

13,49 0,91 2,01 11,45 0,77 1,71 0,84 1,86

20,60 1,39 3,07 13,39 0,90 2,00 1,14 2,54

38,47 2,59 5,74 15,07 1,01 2,25 1,80 4,00

62,08 4,18 9,27 16,25 1,09 2,43 2,64 5,85

149,08 10,03 22,25 19,24 1,30 2,87 5,66 12,56

255,09 17,17 38,07 21,84 1,47 3,26 9,32 20,67

The air permeability was less than maximum allowed.

100

200

250

300

450

15.00081 09 March 2015

Pressure in Pa

150

600

50

It was established that the tested construction did not show any signs of distortion.

The results of the air permeability measurements are shown in table and graph below.

The requirement is that the air permeability the maximum air flow belonging to the class of air

permeability as determined by the first test doesn’t exceed by more than 20% (dotted line).

The door was loaded 50 times with respectively a positive and a negative key pressure P2 of 50%

of the design load. The construction was loaded during approx. 7 sec. with both the negative and

the positive key pressure.

0,1

1

10

100

10 100 1000

m3/h.m1 m3/h.m2

0.25

25,00

150 300 450

m3/h.m1 m3/h.m2

Pa 600

2,50

50

1

2

3

4

Blad 7 van 15

Page 8: TEST REPORT - Reynaers Aluminium€¦ · 4.2.2 Test with repeated pressure and under pressure 4.2.3 Repeated test for air permeability After the tests were performed as described

Report: issued on

4.3 Watertightness

The results of the water tightness test are shown in table below.

Note:

The amount of water in liters / h used for spraying the construction was: 840 L/hMethod 1A

Result:

Pa

4.4 Strength test

Pa

It was established that the door did not show any signs of distortion.

no

no

no

5 no

Pressure in Pa

0

50

100

150

t (min).

The door was watertight up to a pressure of: 250

The door was loaded to a positive and a negative key pressure P3 of: 1200

Water leakage

no

no

15.00081

250 5

09 March 2015

200

15

5

5

5

Blad 8 van 15

Page 9: TEST REPORT - Reynaers Aluminium€¦ · 4.2.2 Test with repeated pressure and under pressure 4.2.3 Repeated test for air permeability After the tests were performed as described

Report: issued on

5. CLASSIFICATION

Air permeability based on length of joint 2

Air permeability based on overall area 2

Air permeability 2

Resistance to wind load C2

Watertightness 6A

Drawn up at Wageningen on:

ir. J.T. Boersma

Technical Manager

Class

15.00081 09 March 2015

09 March 2015

This report may only be reproduced word by word and in its entirety, unless prior written permission has

been obtained from SKG

Blad 9 van 15

Page 10: TEST REPORT - Reynaers Aluminium€¦ · 4.2.2 Test with repeated pressure and under pressure 4.2.3 Repeated test for air permeability After the tests were performed as described

Report: APPENDICES issued on

6.1 APPENDIX 1 Photos of the tested construction

15.00081 09 March 2015

Blad 10 van 15

Page 11: TEST REPORT - Reynaers Aluminium€¦ · 4.2.2 Test with repeated pressure and under pressure 4.2.3 Repeated test for air permeability After the tests were performed as described

Report: APPENDICES issued on

6.2 APPENDIX 2 Drawings of the tested construction

15.00081 09 March 2015

V1

V2

V3

Blad 11 van 15

Page 12: TEST REPORT - Reynaers Aluminium€¦ · 4.2.2 Test with repeated pressure and under pressure 4.2.3 Repeated test for air permeability After the tests were performed as described

Report: APPENDICES issued on 15.00081 09 March 2015

Blad 12 van 15

Page 13: TEST REPORT - Reynaers Aluminium€¦ · 4.2.2 Test with repeated pressure and under pressure 4.2.3 Repeated test for air permeability After the tests were performed as described

Report: APPENDICES issued on 15.00081 09 March 2015

Blad 13 van 15

Page 14: TEST REPORT - Reynaers Aluminium€¦ · 4.2.2 Test with repeated pressure and under pressure 4.2.3 Repeated test for air permeability After the tests were performed as described

Report: APPENDICES issued on 15.00081 09 March 2015

Blad 14 van 15

Page 15: TEST REPORT - Reynaers Aluminium€¦ · 4.2.2 Test with repeated pressure and under pressure 4.2.3 Repeated test for air permeability After the tests were performed as described

Report: 15.00081 APPENDICES issued on #####

Blad 15 van 15