test report #7 system drop-in tests of r134a … cupronickel condenser tubes, and alternative copper...
TRANSCRIPT
Air-Conditioning, Heating, and Refrigeration Institute (AHRI) Low-GWP Alternative Refrigerants Evaluation Program (Low-GWP AREP) TEST REPORT #7 System Drop-In Tests of R134a Alternative Refrigerants (ARM-42a, N-13a, N-13b, R-1234ze(E), and OpteonTM XP10) in a 230-RT Water-Cooled Water Chiller Ken Schultz Steve Kujak Trane / Ingersoll Rand 3600 Pammel Creek Rd La Crosse, WI 54601 January 25, 2013 This report has been made available to the public as part of the author company’s participation in the AHRI’s Low-GWP AREP.
List of Tested Refrigerants’ Compositions (Mass%)
ARM-42a R-134a/R-152a/R-1234yf (7/11/82) N-13a R-134a/R-1234yf/R-1234ze(E) (42/18/40) N-13b R-134a/R-1234ze(E) (42/58) R-1234ze(E) R-1234ze(E) (100) OpteonTM XP10 R-134a/R-1234yf (44/56)
LowGWPAREPR134aW/CScrewChillerTestSummary – FinalReportcreated:19November2012
lastedited:19November2012page2of16
TraneMP_Report#1_external_121119.docx Ken Schultz•ThermalSystemsGroup
INTRODUCTION
Thisreportdocumentstestsrunonanominal230‐tonwater‐cooledscrewcompressor‐basedwaterchillerinTrane’sLaCrosse,Wisconsin,laboratory.Therefrigerantstestedarelistedbelow:
name supplier order begin testing
end testing
number of runs
R134a (#1) (self) 1 16‐May‐2012 23‐May‐2012 38
XP10 DuPont 2 29‐May‐2012 11‐Jun‐2012 24
N‐13a Honeywell 3 13‐Jun‐2012 20‐Jun‐2012 34
N‐13b Honeywell 4 25‐Jun‐2012 29‐Jun‐2012 33
R1234ze(E) Honeywell 5 06‐Jul‐2012 13‐Jul‐2012 40
ARM‐42a Arkema 6 20‐Aug‐2012 11‐Oct‐2012 67
R134a (#2) (self) 7 15‐Oct‐2012 16‐Oct‐2012 13
R1234yf Honeywell 8 Dec‐2012 ?
D4Y Daikin Daikincouldnotsupplyenoughrefrigerantforthechiller.
TestswithR134awererepeatedattheendasacheck;performanceverycloselyduplicatedtheoriginalbaselinedataset.TestswithR1234yfwillbeconductedif/whenHoneywellcansupplythevolumeofrefrigerantneeded.DaikinwasunabletoprovidesufficientvolumeofD4Yforthetestchillerusedhere.
TESTSETUP
Thechillertestedhereisanominal230‐ton“RTWD”dual‐circuitwater‐cooledscrewcompressor‐basedwaterchiller.Thespecificunittestedisapre‐productionprototypebuiltfordesignverificationtestinginthelaboratory.Thechillerunderwentseveralmodificationsduringprevioustesting,includingachangetohighliftcompressors,cupronickelcondensertubes,andalternativecopperevaporatortubes.PhotosofthechillerareshowninFigure1.Thechillerconsistsoftwoindependentrefrigerantcircuits.Tominimizetheamountofrefrigerantneeded,testsherewererunwithonlyonecircuit.Thecircuitadjacenttothechilledandcoolingwaterconnectionswasused.Thesecondcircuitwaschargedwithnitrogenat5psigtominimizeheattransferbetweenthewaterpasses.Theevaporatorusesfallingfilmtechnologyinconjunctionwithafloodedpool.Thecondenserincorporatesaliquidrefrigerantsubcooler.Thecompressorrunsatfixedspeed(noAFD).Primaryinstrumentationincluded:
Chilledwaterloopo volumeflowrate(magneticflowmeter)o inletandoutlettemperatures(dualRTD’sateachlocation)o absolutepressurescollocatedwithtemperaturemeasurementso water‐sidepressuredrop
Coolingwaterloopo volumeflowrate(magneticflowmeter)o inletandoutlettemperature(dualRTD’sateachlocation)o absolutepressurescollocatedwithtemperaturemeasurementso water‐sidepressuredrop
CompressorpowerinputThecollocatedtemperatureandpressuremeasurementsareusedtocomputetheinletandoutletenthalpiesofthewater.Heattransferrateiscalculatedastheproductofthewatermassflowrateandthedifferencebetweentheinletandoutletenthalpies.Thecompressor‐basedEERiscalculatedastheratioofthechilledwaterheattransferratetothecompressorpowerinput.
LowGWPAREPR134aW/CScrewChillerTestSummary – FinalReportcreated:19November2012
lastedited:19November2012page3of16
TraneMP_Report#1_external_121119.docx Ken Schultz•ThermalSystemsGroup
Secondaryinstrumentationincludesvarioustemperatureandpressuremeasurementsalongtherefrigerantflowpath.Keymeasurementsincludethetemperatureandpressureatthecompressorsuctionanddischargealongwiththecondenserliquidleavingtemperatureandpressure.AlistofinstrumentationisincludedasAppendixA.
METHODOFTEST
ThemethodoftestisconsistentwithAppendixCofAHRIStandard550/590‐2011withoperatingconditionsgenerallyheldwithintightertolerances.Performanceisreportedhereasmeasured;noadjustmentsaremadeforfoulingallowance.Thecoolingcapacitiesreportedarecalculatedfromthemeasuredchilledwaterflowrateandthedifferencebetweentheenteringandleavingchilledwaterenthalpies.Theenthalpiesarecomputedfromthemeasuredwatertemperaturesandpressures(collocated).Therefore,thecapacitiesreportedherecorrespondtothe“grossrefrigeratingcapacity”definedinAHRIStandard550/590‐2011.ThermodynamicpropertiesofwaterarecomputedusingTrane’sinternalcode,whichisconsistentwiththe550/590equationstowellwithinexperimentalaccuracies.Thetestmatrixconsistedofthefollowingsteps:
1. Refrigerantchargesweepatbaselineoperating(boundary)conditionsof:–leavingchilledwatertemperature=44°F0.1°Fd(2s)–chilledwaterflowrate=550gpm2gpm–enteringcoolingwatertemperature=85°F0.1°Fd–coolingwaterflowrate=700gpm2gpmThechargeforfurthertestingwasselectedatmaximumEER(5lbmresolution)withconsiderationgiventotherefrigerantlevelinthecondenser/subcooler.
2. Loadlineat100%,90%,80%,70%,60%,minwith“baseline”flowrates:–leavingchilledwatertemperature=44°F0.1°Fd(2s)–chilledwaterflowrate=550gpm2gpm–enteringcoolingwatertemperature=85°F0.1°Fd–coolingwaterflowrate=700gpm2gpm
3. Loadlineat100%,90%,80%,70%,60%,minwith“standard”flowrates:–leavingchilledwatertemperature=44°F0.1°Fd(2s)–chilledwaterflowrate=2.4gpm/ton×tons@100%×2–enteringcoolingwatertemperature=85°F0.1°Fd–coolingwaterflowrate=3.0gpm/ton×tons@100%×2
4. Variationincoolingwaterenteringtemperaturewith–leavingchilledwatertemperature=44°F0.1°Fd(2s)–chilledwaterflowrate=510gpm2gpm–enteringcoolingwatertemperature=85°F0.1°Fd–coolingwaterflowrate=635gpm2gpm
Notethatthewaterflowrateswerebasedonfullchillercapacity(ie,asifbothcircuitswereactive).Runningthewaterflowratesbasedonthesinglecircuitcapacitywouldresultinverylowwatervelocitiesinthetubesandpoorwater‐sideheattransfercoefficients.Inhindsight,itmighthavebeenmoreappropriatetoelevatetheenteringcoolingwatertemperatureby5°FdorsotobemoreconsistentwithAHRI550‐590standardratingconditions.Intheend,consistentconditionswereusedthatprovideafaircomparisonamongthedifferentalternativerefrigerantstested.Figure2showstheenergybalanceclosureerrorsforallofthetestpointsrun.Energybalanceerrorsweregenerallylessthan1%.Thisdemonstratesthestabilityandaccuracyoftheprimarytestmeasurements.
LowGWPAREPR134aW/CScrewChillerTestSummary – FinalReportcreated:19November2012
lastedited:19November2012page5of16
TraneMP_Report#1_external_121119.docx Ken Schultz•ThermalSystemsGroup
alternativerefrigerantsarealllowerthanforR134a,exceptforthethirdARM‐42adataset.2TheXP10HTC’sarejustslightlylowerthanforR134a.Theshell‐sideHTC’sforR1234ze(E)wereroughly30%lowerthanforR134a.Thisappearscontrarytorecentlypublishedsingle‐tubepoolboilingdata.3TheUoEforR1234ze(E)isalsonegativelyimpactedbythereducedtubein‐sideHTCduetothereductioninchilledwaterflowratewhenoperatingwithreducedcapacityatthestandardflowrates.N‐13aandN‐13bhadverypoorevaporatorperformance.Thiscouldpossiblybeattributabletothe~1°Fdglideassociatedwiththesetwoblends.Visualobservationsindicatedthatthebundlewettingappearedtobesimilarforallrefrigerants;therewerenoobviousindicationsofunusualdry‐outorcarryoverforanyoftherefrigerants.Thereweresomevariationsinoilfoamingbehaviorinthepoolsection(eg,thebubblesizeswerelargerforR1234ze(E),indicativeofthehighervaporspecificvolume),buttheywereminoranddidnotappeartoimpactevaporatorperformance.ThebundleaverageheattransfercoefficientsforthecondenserrelativetoR134aareshowninFigure10.Relativelymildtomoderatereductionsincondensershell‐sideheatcoefficientswereobservedforR1234ze(E),XP10,N‐13a,andN13b.Curiously,theN‐13blends(with~1°Fdglide)appearedtohavesufferedagreaterdegradationinevaporatorperformancethancondenserperformance.AfterseeingverypoorcondenserheattransferperformanceduringtheinitialtestsetwithARM‐42a(#1),arefrigerantsamplewascollectedfromthechillercondenservaporspace,appearingtoindicateanon‐condensablesconcentrationof1.5%vol.4Therefrigerantchargewasreclaimedbackintotheoriginaltwocylindersandthecylindervaporspaceventeduntilthenon‐condensablesconcentrationswere0.96%voland0.78%vol.5ThechillerwasthenrechargedwithARM‐42aandthetestsetrepeated(#2).Condenserperformanceimprovedmarginally,butwasstillquitepoor.Thecondenservaporspacewasagainsampled,thistimewithanon‐condensablesconcentrationof0.9%vol.Therefrigerantwasagainreclaimedintothecylinders.Samplestakenfromcylindersshowedanon‐condensablesconcentrationof~1.5%vol.Thecylinderswereagainventeduntilthenon‐condensablesconcentrationswere0.5%voland0.7%vol.ThechillerwasthenrechargedwithARM‐42aandthetestsetrepeatedathirdtime(#3).Condenserperformanceagaindidnotchange.Arefrigerantsampleextractedfromthecondenservaporspaceshowedanon‐condensablesconcentrationofonly0.3%vol.Whenreclaimedbackintothecylinders,thenon‐condensablesconcentrationwasmeasuredtobeonly0.6%vol.Asnotedabove,curiouslyduringthethirdARM‐42atestset,theevaporatorheattransferperformanceincreasedsignificantly.Thereasonforthisisunknown.ArepeatofthebaselinewithR134a(Oct)followingtheARM‐42atestsproducedresultsveryconsistentwiththeinitialbaselinetestset(May).ThecomparisonsshownherearebasedontheoverallbetterperformanceofthethirdARM‐42adataset.Thesourceofthenon‐condensablesfoundintheARM‐42atestsisunknown.Weareconfidentinourlaboratoryprocedureswithrespecttochillerevacuationandcharging.AdditionalprecautionsweretakenduringpreparationandchargingforthethirdtestofARM‐42atoensurenointroductionofairduringtheprocess.Theisentropicefficiencyofthecompressorcanbedeterminedfromthemeasuredtemperaturesandpressuresatthecompressorsuctionanddischargealongwiththerefrigerantthermodynamicpropertiesdescriptionprovidedbytherefrigerantsuppliers.Theresultsobtainedhereforthefull‐loadcapacitypointsrunwithstandardwaterflowratesareshowninFigure11.Thecompressorperformedsimilarlyforallrefrigerants,mostrunningslightlybelowR134a(∆η~0..0.02).TheN‐13bpointinFigure11issomewhatofanoutlier;thepart‐loadpointsallfellatorbelowtherespectiveR134apoints.2Morebelow.ThefirsttwoARM‐42adatasetsproducedevaporatorHTC’sthatfellbetweenXP10andR1234ze.
3EvanRooyenandJRThome,“POOLBOILINGONENHANCEDBOILINGTUBESWITHR‐134a,R‐236faANDR‐1234ze”,ECI8thInternationalConferenceonBoilingandCondensationHeatTransfer,EcolePolytechniqueFédéraledeLausanne,3‐7June2012,Lausanne,Switzerland.
4Thenon‐condensablegaseselutedfromtheGCcolumnatthetimeindicativeofbeingair.
5Theconcentrationsarebelowthe1.5%volupperlimittypicalofmostrefrigerantslistedinAHRIStandard700.
LowGWPAREPR134aW/CScrewChillerTestSummary – FinalReportcreated:19November2012
lastedited:19November2012page7of16
TraneMP_Report#1_external_121119.docx Ken Schultz•ThermalSystemsGroup
considerationwillneedtobegiventodesignofthecondensercoilforair‐cooledchillerproductsusingR1234ze(E).AllofthealternatefluidssufferedtosomeextentwithregardtoheattransferperformancerelativetoR134a.ThepoorperformanceofARM‐42ainthecondenserremainspuzzlingatthispoint.Furtherstudyofbothevaporation/boilingandcondensingbehavioroftheserefrigerantsonenhancedtubesiswarranted.Theconsistencybetweencalculatedsaturationandmeasuredtemperatures,alongwithgeneralagreementamongthecompressoradiabaticefficienciesandsuctionvolumeflowrates,indicatesthattherefrigerantpropertiesdescriptionsprovidedarereasonablyaccurate.
NOMENCLATURE
BL “baseline”operatingconditionsasdescribedinMethodofTestsection
CAP Capacity
Chrg refrigerantcharge
COP CoefficientofPerformance;seeEER
EB Energybalanceclosureerror
EER EnergyEfficiencyRatio=coolingcapacitydividedbyelectricalpowerinputtothecompressor[Btu/W·hr]
°Fd temperaturedifferenceinFahrenheit
FC,FC’s “foulingchecks”;essentiallyrepeatpointstakenataspecificoperatingcondition
HTC heattransfercoefficient
hoC’, , shell‐sideheattransfercoefficientinthecondenserbundle
hoE, , shell‐sideheattransfercoefficientintheevaporatorbundle
Pmsrd measuredpressure
q"C averageheatfluxinthecondenser
q"E averageheatfluxintheevaporator
QChW, heattransferratecomputedfrommeasurementsofthechilledwater
QClW, heattransferratecomputedfrommeasurementsofthecoolingwater
Std “standard”operatingconditionsasdescribedinMethodofTestsection(inparticular,standardevaporatorchilledwaterflowis2.4gpm/maxtonandstandardcondensercoolingwaterflowis3.0gpm/maxton)
∆TappC,dTappCapproachtemperatureinthecondenser(condensersaturationleavingcoolingwatertemperature)
∆TappE,dTappEapproachtemperatureintheevaporator(leavingchilledwaterevaporatorsaturationtemperature)
∆Tsc refrigerantsubcoolingleavingthecondenser/subcooler(refrigerantsaturationtemperatureactualtemperature)
Tmsrd measuredtemperature
Tsat saturationtemperature
UoC, , overallheattransfercoefficientinthecondenserbundle
UoE, , overallheattransfercoefficientintheevaporatorbundle
Wcmpr, compressorpowerconsumption
x refrigerantqualityinthetwo‐phaseregion
ηCmpr adiabaticefficiencyofthecompressor
T&Pmeasurementstationsforcoolingandchilledwaterloops.
nottested
nottested
nottested
nottested
nottested
nottested
nottested
nottested
nottested
nottested
nottested
nottested
Appendix A – Instrumentation List
ID # ** Description Units Type Measurement Accuracy
1 EVAP WATER FLOW GPM SI: m³/h Rosemount Magnetic ± 0.5% of Rdg
2 EVAP Unit water delta Press psid SI: kPa∙diff Rosemount 1151 ± 0.054 PSID
3 Evap unit water press ‐ ent psia SI: kPa∙abs Sensotec DS – 250 psia ± 0.125 PSIA
4 Evap unit water press ‐ lvg psia SI: kPa∙abs Sensotec DS – 250 psia ± 0.125 PSIA
5 COND WATER FLOW GPM SI: m³/h Rosemount Magnetic ± 0.5% of Rdg
6 Cond Unit Water Delta Press psid SI: kPa∙diff Rosemount 1151 ± 0.054 PSID
7 Cond Unit Water Press ‐ ent psia SI: kPa∙abs Sensotec DS – 250 psia ± 0.125 PSIA
8 Cond Unit Water Press ‐ lvg psia SI: kPa∙abs Sensotec DS – 250 psia ± 0.125 PSIA
100 Evap Shell Press (1) ‐ Ckt #1 psia SI: kPa∙abs Sensotec DS – 250 psia ± 0.125 PSIA
105 Evap Shell Press (2) ‐ Ckt #1 psia SI: kPa∙abs Sensotec DS – 250 psia ± 0.125 PSIA
110 Comp Suct Refrig Press ‐ Ckt #1 psia SI: kPa∙abs Sensotec DS – 250 psia ± 0.125 PSIA
115 Comp Disch Refrig Press ‐ Ckt #1 psia SI: kPa∙abs Sensotec DS – 500 psia ± 0.25 PSIA
125 Cond Top Shell Press Loc 1 ‐ Ckt # 1 psia SI: kPa∙abs Sensotec DS – 500 psia ± 0.25 PSIA
126 Cond Top Shell Press Loc 2 ‐ Ckt # 1 psia SI: kPa∙abs Sensotec DS – 500 psia ± 0.25 PSIA
130 Lvg Subcooler Refrig Press ‐ Ckt 1 psia SI: kPa∙abs Sensotec DS – 500 psia ± 0.25 PSIA
137 Ent Evap Refrig Press Ckt #1 psia SI: kPa∙abs Sensotec DS – 250 psia ± 0.25 PSIA
215 Comp Disch Temp ‐ Ckt #1 °F SI: °C Type T TC ± 1.0 F
240 Ent Evap Refrig Temp Ckt #1 °F SI: °C Type T TC ± 1.0 F
250 Comp Suct Refrig Temp Ckt #1 °F SI: °C Type T TC ± 1.0 F
251 Line Lvg Oil Separator T Ckt #1 °F SI: °C Type T TC ± 1.0 F
330 Evap RI probe Temp ‐ Loc 1 ‐ Ckt 1 °F SI: °C Type T TC ± 1.0 F
331 Evap RI probe Temp ‐ Loc 2 ‐ Ckt 1 °F SI: °C Type T TC ± 1.0 F
332 Evap RI probe Temp ‐ Loc 3 ‐ Ckt 1 °F SI: °C Type T TC ± 1.0 F
400 ENT EVAP WATER TEMP LOC 1 °F SI: °C 100 Ω RTD ± 0.1 F
401 ENT EVAP WATER TEMP LOC 2 °F SI: °C 100 Ω RTD ± 0.1 F
402 LVG EVAP WATER TEMP LOC 1 °F SI: °C 100 Ω RTD ± 0.1 F
403 LVG EVAP WATER TEMP LOC 2 °F SI: °C 100 Ω RTD ± 0.1 F
405 ENT COND WATER TEMP LOC 1 °F SI: °C 100 Ω RTD ± 0.1 F
406 ENT COND WATER TEMP LOC 2 °F SI: °C 100 Ω RTD ± 0.1 F
407 LVG COND WATER TEMP LOC 1 °F SI: °C 100 Ω RTD ± 0.1 F
408 LVG COND WATER TEMP LOC 2 °F SI: °C 100 Ω RTD ± 0.1 F
410 Evap Sat RTD ‐ Ckt #1 °F SI: °C 100 Ω RTD ± 0.1 F
417 Lvg subcooler refrigerant RTD ‐ Ckt #1 °F SI: °C 100 Ω RTD ± 0.1 F
420 Compressor VOLTAGE AB ‐ Ckt # 1 V SI: V
421 Compressor VOLTAGE AC ‐ Ckt # 1 V SI: V
422 Compressor VOLTAGE CB ‐ Ckt # 1 V SI: V
423 Compressor CURRENT A ‐ Ckt # 1 A SI: A ~0.5% of Rdg w/ CTs
424 Compressor CURRENT B ‐ Ckt # 1 A SI: A ~0.5% of Rdg w/ CTs
425 Compressor CURRENT C ‐ Ckt # 1 A SI: A ~0.5% of Rdg w/ CTs
426 Compressor Power ‐ Ckt # 1 W SI: W ~0.5% of Rdg w/ CTs
427 Compressor Power ‐ Frequency ‐ Ckt # 1 Hz SI: Hz
428 Compressor Power ‐ Power Factor ‐ Ckt # 1 None SI: NONE
480 Evap RI probe ‐ loc 1 ‐ ckt 1 % SI: %
481 Evap RI probe ‐ loc 2 ‐ ckt 1 % SI: %
482 Evap RI probe ‐ loc 3 ‐ ckt 1 % SI: %
496 Leaving Oil Separator RI Probe ‐ ckt 1 % SI: %
500 BAROMETRIC PRESS FROM METROLOGY psia SI: kPa∙abs ± 0.0157 PSIA
600 Chiller : Liquid Level Setpoint in SI: mm N/A
601 Circuit 1 : Refrigerant Liquid Level in SI: mm N/A
602 Circuit 2 : Refrigerant Liquid Level in SI: mm N/A
LowGWPAREPR134aW/CScrewChillerTestSummary – FinalReportcreated:19November2012
lastedited:19November2012page16of16
TraneMP_Report#1_external_121119.docx Ken Schultz•ThermalSystemsGroup
AppendixB
DataPointsCollectedatFull‐LoadCapacityWhenRunningattheStandardOperatingConditions
(InsertthepagesfromTraneMP_Report#1_DataForms.pdffollowingthispageinthePDF.)
Appendix B
Data Points Collected at Standard Operating Conditions
Low GWP AREP SYSTEM DROP‐IN TEST DATA FORM page 1
Manufacturer: Trane
Basic Information
Alternative Refrigerant XP10 DuPont
Alternative Lubricant Type and ISO Viscosity POE – 68
Baseline Refrigerant R134a
Baseline Lubricant Type and ISO Viscosity POE – 68
Make and Model of System RTWD water‐cooled chiller (running first of two refrigerant circuits
Nominal Capacity and Type of System 230 nominal tons (preproduction prototype for lab verification)
Comparison Data Base Alt. SI Units Base Alt. IP Units Ratio
Mode (heating/cooling) cooling
Compressor Type screw compressor (high lift version)
Compressor Displacement m³/hr cfm
Nominal Motor Size kW hp
Motor Speed (60 Hz) Hz
Expansion Device Type electronic expansion valve
Lubricant Charge L gal
Refrigerant Charge 81.6 81.6 kg 180 180 lbm 1.000
Composition (at Cmpr Suct)
6.7 6.7 °C 43.98 44.00 °F 0.02
1928 1927 L/min 509.3 509.2 gpm 1.000
Flow rate (tons × 2) 5.2 5.2 L/min∙kW 2.41 2.41 gpm/ton 1.002
29.5 29.5 °C 85.0 85.1 °F 0.0
2409 2409 L/min 636 636 gpm 1.000
Flow rate (tons × 2) 6.5 6.5 L/min∙kW 3.01 3.01 gpm/ton 1.002
Capacity 371.9 371.2 kW 105.7 105.5 tons 0.998
Power to Compressor 86.0 89.6 kW 86.0 89.6 kW 1.043
COP or EER (compressor only) 4.33 4.14 [] 14.76 14.13 Btu/W∙hr 0.957
Refrigerant Mass Flow Rate 8,596 9,961 kg/hr 18,950 21,960 lbm/hr 1.159
Refrig Flow @ Cmpr Suction 518.2 514.3 m³/hr 305.0 302.7 cfm 0.992
Other System Changes
The unit tested has non‐standard evaporator tubes (alternate high performance design).
The unit tested has non‐standard condenser tubes (90/10 cupronickel).
Only one of two refrigerant circuits was run due to limited availability of some refrigerants.
System Data Base Alt. Ratio
Degradation Coefficient
Seasonal Energy Efficiency Ration – SEER
Heating Seasonal Performance Factor – HSPF
12 3.1
Chilled
Water
Leaving Temp
Flow rate
Cooling
Water
Entering Temp
Flow rate
08‐Nov‐2012
Appendix B
Data Points Collected at Standard Operating Conditions
Low GWP AREP SYSTEM DROP‐IN TEST DATA FORM page 2
Type of System: RTWD wc Water Chiller Alternate Refrigerant: XP10
Water Side Data Base Alt. SI Units Base Alt. IP Units Ratio | Diff
Evaporator (shell & tube)
fluid
flow rate 1928.0 1927.4 L/hr 509 509 gpm 1.000
T entering 9.4 9.4 °C 48.9 48.9 °F 0.0°F
T leaving 6.7 6.7 °C 44.0 44.0 °F 0.0°F
pressure drop 121 114 kPa 17.5 16.5 psid 0.945
Condenser (shell & tube)
fluid
flow rate 2408.9 2408.5 L/hr 636 636 gpm 1.000
T entering 29.5 29.5 °C 85.0 85.1 °F 0.0°F
T leaving 32.2 32.3 °C 90.0 90.1 °F 0.1°F
pressure drop 140 136 kPa 20.3 19.7 psid 0.969
Refrigerant Side
T (°C) P (kPa) T (°C) P (kPa) T (°F) P (psia) T (°F) P (psia)
Compressor (screw)
suction 3.9 338 3.7 367 39.0 49.0 38.7 53.2
discharge 51.2 943 47.5 1007 124.2 136.8 117.4 146.0
dchrg SH | Pratio 14.0 9.5 25.2 2.79 17.15 2.75
Condenser (shell & tube w/integral subcooler)
inlet/shell 51.2 943 47.5 1,007 124.2 136.8 117.4 146.0
shell dewpoint 36.4 37.0 97.6 98.6
shell bubblept 36.4 37.0 97.6 98.6
subcooler outlet 32.5 911 32.5 964 90.5 132.1 90.5 139.8
subcooling (local) 3.5 3.8 6.2 6.8
Expansion Device (EXV)
inlet 32.5 911 32.5 964 90.5 132.1 90.5 139.8
Evaporator (shell & tube)
inlet/shell 4.3 341 4.2 370 39.7 49.5 39.5 53.7
outlet/shell 4.3 341 4.2 370 39.7 49.5 39.5 53.7
Refrigerant Side Base Alt. SI Units Base Alt. IP Units Ratio
suction line pressure drop 3.2 3.7 kPa 0.46 0.53 psid 1.16
discharge line pressure drop 20 25 kPa 2.90 3.59 psid 1.24
08‐Nov‐2012
water
water
Base Alt. Base Alt.
Appendix B
Data Points Collected at Standard Operating Conditions
Low GWP AREP SYSTEM DROP‐IN TEST DATA FORM page 1
Manufacturer: Trane
Basic Information
Alternative Refrigerant N‐13a Honeywell
Alternative Lubricant Type and ISO Viscosity POE – 68
Baseline Refrigerant R134a
Baseline Lubricant Type and ISO Viscosity POE – 68
Make and Model of System RTWD water‐cooled chiller (running first of two refrigerant circuits
Nominal Capacity and Type of System 230 nominal tons (preproduction prototype for lab verification)
Comparison Data Base Alt. SI Units Base Alt. IP Units Ratio
Mode (heating/cooling) cooling
Compressor Type screw compressor (high lift version)
Compressor Displacement m³/hr cfm
Nominal Motor Size kW hp
Motor Speed (60 Hz) Hz
Expansion Device Type electronic expansion valve
Lubricant Charge L gal
Refrigerant Charge 81.6 79.4 kg 180 175 lbm 0.972
Composition (at Cmpr Suct)
6.7 6.6 °C 43.98 43.93 °F ‐0.06
1928 1708 L/min 509.3 451.3 gpm 0.886
Flow rate (tons × 2) 5.2 5.2 L/min∙kW 2.41 2.41 gpm/ton 1.001
29.5 29.5 °C 85.0 85.0 °F 0.0
2409 2138 L/min 636 565 gpm 0.887
Flow rate (tons × 2) 6.5 6.5 L/min∙kW 3.01 3.02 gpm/ton 1.003
Capacity 371.9 329.1 kW 105.7 93.6 tons 0.885
Power to Compressor 86.0 79.0 kW 86.0 79.0 kW 0.919
COP or EER (compressor only) 4.33 4.17 [] 14.76 14.21 Btu/W∙hr 0.963
Refrigerant Mass Flow Rate 8,596 8,405 kg/hr 18,950 18,530 lbm/hr 0.978
Refrig Flow @ Cmpr Suction 518.2 518.2 m³/hr 305.0 305.0 cfm 1.000
Other System Changes
The unit tested has non‐standard evaporator tubes (alternate high performance design).
The unit tested has non‐standard condenser tubes (90/10 cupronickel).
Only one of two refrigerant circuits was run due to limited availability of some refrigerants.
System Data Base Alt. Ratio
Degradation Coefficient
Seasonal Energy Efficiency Ration – SEER
Heating Seasonal Performance Factor – HSPF
12 3.1
Chilled
Water
Leaving Temp
Flow rate
Cooling
Water
Entering Temp
Flow rate
08‐Nov‐2012
Appendix B
Data Points Collected at Standard Operating Conditions
Low GWP AREP SYSTEM DROP‐IN TEST DATA FORM page 2
Type of System: RTWD wc Water Chiller Alternate Refrigerant: N‐13a
Water Side Data Base Alt. SI Units Base Alt. IP Units Ratio | Diff
Evaporator (shell & tube)
fluid
flow rate 1928.0 1708.3 L/hr 509 451 gpm 0.886
T entering 9.4 9.4 °C 48.9 48.8 °F ‐0.1°F
T leaving 6.7 6.6 °C 44.0 43.9 °F ‐0.1°F
pressure drop 121 96 kPa 17.5 14.0 psid 0.799
Condenser (shell & tube)
fluid
flow rate 2408.9 2137.7 L/hr 636 565 gpm 0.887
T entering 29.5 29.5 °C 85.0 85.0 °F 0.0°F
T leaving 32.2 32.2 °C 90.0 90.0 °F 0.0°F
pressure drop 140 112 kPa 20.3 16.3 psid 0.802
Refrigerant Side
T (°C) P (kPa) T (°C) P (kPa) T (°F) P (psia) T (°F) P (psia)
Compressor (screw)
suction 3.9 338 3.3 311 39.0 49.0 38.0 45.1
discharge 51.2 943 48.2 893 124.2 136.8 118.7 129.5
dchrg SH | Pratio 14.0 10.7 25.2 2.79 19.18 2.87
Condenser (shell & tube w/integral subcooler)
inlet/shell 51.2 943 48.2 893 124.2 136.8 118.7 129.5
shell dewpoint 36.4 36.7 97.6 98.1
shell bubblept 36.4 36.1 97.6 97.0
subcooler outlet 32.5 911 32.6 861 90.5 132.1 90.8 124.9
subcooling (local) 3.5 2.9 6.2 5.3
Expansion Device (EXV)
inlet 32.5 911 32.6 861 90.5 132.1 90.8 124.9
Evaporator (shell & tube)
inlet/shell 4.3 341 2.9 314 39.7 49.5 37.2 45.5
outlet/shell 4.3 341 3.5 314 39.7 49.5 38.2 45.5
Refrigerant Side Base Alt. SI Units Base Alt. IP Units Ratio
suction line pressure drop 3.2 3.0 kPa 0.46 0.44 psid 0.96
discharge line pressure drop 20 19 kPa 2.90 2.82 psid 0.97
08‐Nov‐2012
water
water
Base Alt. Base Alt.
Appendix B
Data Points Collected at Standard Operating Conditions
Low GWP AREP SYSTEM DROP‐IN TEST DATA FORM page 1
Manufacturer: Trane
Basic Information
Alternative Refrigerant N‐13b Honeywell
Alternative Lubricant Type and ISO Viscosity POE – 68
Baseline Refrigerant R134a
Baseline Lubricant Type and ISO Viscosity POE – 68
Make and Model of System RTWD water‐cooled chiller (running first of two refrigerant circuits
Nominal Capacity and Type of System 230 nominal tons (preproduction prototype for lab verification)
Comparison Data Base Alt. SI Units Base Alt. IP Units Ratio
Mode (heating/cooling) cooling
Compressor Type screw compressor (high lift version)
Compressor Displacement m³/hr cfm
Nominal Motor Size kW hp
Motor Speed (60 Hz) Hz
Expansion Device Type electronic expansion valve
Lubricant Charge L gal
Refrigerant Charge 81.6 79.4 kg 180 175 lbm 0.972
Composition (at Cmpr Suct)
6.7 6.7 °C 43.98 43.98 °F 0.00
1928 1636 L/min 509.3 432.3 gpm 0.849
Flow rate (tons × 2) 5.2 5.2 L/min∙kW 2.41 2.40 gpm/ton 0.995
29.5 29.5 °C 85.0 85.1 °F 0.1
2409 2047 L/min 636 541 gpm 0.850
Flow rate (tons × 2) 6.5 6.5 L/min∙kW 3.01 3.00 gpm/ton 0.996
Capacity 371.9 317.2 kW 105.7 90.2 tons 0.853
Power to Compressor 86.0 74.4 kW 86.0 74.4 kW 0.865
COP or EER (compressor only) 4.33 4.26 [] 14.76 14.55 Btu/W∙hr 0.986
Refrigerant Mass Flow Rate 8,596 7,784 kg/hr 18,950 17,160 lbm/hr 0.906
Refrig Flow @ Cmpr Suction 518.2 519.0 m³/hr 305.0 305.5 cfm 1.002
Other System Changes
The unit tested has non‐standard evaporator tubes (alternate high performance design).
The unit tested has non‐standard condenser tubes (90/10 cupronickel).
Only one of two refrigerant circuits was run due to limited availability of some refrigerants.
System Data Base Alt. Ratio
Degradation Coefficient
Seasonal Energy Efficiency Ration – SEER
Heating Seasonal Performance Factor – HSPF
12 3.1
Chilled
Water
Leaving Temp
Flow rate
Cooling
Water
Entering Temp
Flow rate
08‐Nov‐2012
Appendix B
Data Points Collected at Standard Operating Conditions
Low GWP AREP SYSTEM DROP‐IN TEST DATA FORM page 2
Type of System: RTWD wc Water Chiller Alternate Refrigerant: N‐13b
Water Side Data Base Alt. SI Units Base Alt. IP Units Ratio | Diff
Evaporator (shell & tube)
fluid
flow rate 1928.0 1636.2 L/hr 509 432 gpm 0.849
T entering 9.4 9.4 °C 48.9 48.9 °F 0.0°F
T leaving 6.7 6.7 °C 44.0 44.0 °F 0.0°F
pressure drop 121 92 kPa 17.5 13.4 psid 0.766
Condenser (shell & tube)
fluid
flow rate 2408.9 2046.9 L/hr 636 541 gpm 0.850
T entering 29.5 29.5 °C 85.0 85.1 °F 0.1°F
T leaving 32.2 32.3 °C 90.0 90.1 °F 0.1°F
pressure drop 140 108 kPa 20.3 15.7 psid 0.774
Refrigerant Side
T (°C) P (kPa) T (°C) P (kPa) T (°F) P (psia) T (°F) P (psia)
Compressor (screw)
suction 3.9 338 3.6 290 39.0 49.0 38.5 42.0
discharge 51.2 943 48.0 836 124.2 136.8 118.4 121.2
dchrg SH | Pratio 14.0 10.4 25.2 2.79 18.75 2.89
Condenser (shell & tube w/integral subcooler)
inlet/shell 51.2 943 48.0 836 124.2 136.8 118.4 121.2
shell dewpoint 36.4 36.7 97.6 98.1
shell bubblept 36.4 36.1 97.6 96.9
subcooler outlet 32.5 911 32.1 806 90.5 132.1 89.7 116.9
subcooling (local) 3.5 3.5 6.2 6.3
Expansion Device (EXV)
inlet 32.5 911 32.1 806 90.5 132.1 89.7 116.9
Evaporator (shell & tube)
inlet/shell 4.3 341 3.3 292 39.7 49.5 37.9 42.4
outlet/shell 4.3 341 3.8 292 39.7 49.5 38.8 42.4
Refrigerant Side Base Alt. SI Units Base Alt. IP Units Ratio
suction line pressure drop 3.2 2.9 kPa 0.46 0.42 psid 0.92
discharge line pressure drop 20 20 kPa 2.90 2.84 psid 0.98
08‐Nov‐2012
water
water
Base Alt. Base Alt.
Appendix B
Data Points Collected at Standard Operating Conditions
Low GWP AREP SYSTEM DROP‐IN TEST DATA FORM page 1
Manufacturer: Trane
Basic Information
Alternative Refrigerant R1234ze Honeywell
Alternative Lubricant Type and ISO Viscosity POE – 68
Baseline Refrigerant R134a
Baseline Lubricant Type and ISO Viscosity POE – 68
Make and Model of System RTWD water‐cooled chiller (running first of two refrigerant circuits
Nominal Capacity and Type of System 230 nominal tons (preproduction prototype for lab verification)
Comparison Data Base Alt. SI Units Base Alt. IP Units Ratio
Mode (heating/cooling) cooling
Compressor Type screw compressor (high lift version)
Compressor Displacement m³/hr cfm
Nominal Motor Size kW hp
Motor Speed (60 Hz) Hz
Expansion Device Type electronic expansion valve
Lubricant Charge L gal
Refrigerant Charge 81.6 79.4 kg 180 175 lbm 0.972
Composition (at Cmpr Suct)
6.7 6.6 °C 43.98 43.96 °F ‐0.02
1928 1417 L/min 509.3 374.2 gpm 0.735
Flow rate (tons × 2) 5.2 5.1 L/min∙kW 2.41 2.37 gpm/ton 0.985
29.5 29.5 °C 85.0 85.0 °F 0.0
2409 1774 L/min 636 469 gpm 0.736
Flow rate (tons × 2) 6.5 6.4 L/min∙kW 3.01 2.97 gpm/ton 0.987
Capacity 371.9 277.4 kW 105.7 78.9 tons 0.746
Power to Compressor 86.0 63.0 kW 86.0 63.0 kW 0.733
COP or EER (compressor only) 4.33 4.40 [] 14.76 15.02 Btu/W∙hr 1.017
Refrigerant Mass Flow Rate 8,596 6,981 kg/hr 18,950 15,390 lbm/hr 0.812
Refrig Flow @ Cmpr Suction 518.2 517.7 m³/hr 305.0 304.7 cfm 0.999
Other System Changes
The unit tested has non‐standard evaporator tubes (alternate high performance design).
The unit tested has non‐standard condenser tubes (90/10 cupronickel).
Only one of two refrigerant circuits was run due to limited availability of some refrigerants.
System Data Base Alt. Ratio
Degradation Coefficient
Seasonal Energy Efficiency Ration – SEER
Heating Seasonal Performance Factor – HSPF
12 3.1
Chilled
Water
Leaving Temp
Flow rate
Cooling
Water
Entering Temp
Flow rate
08‐Nov‐2012
Appendix B
Data Points Collected at Standard Operating Conditions
Low GWP AREP SYSTEM DROP‐IN TEST DATA FORM page 2
Type of System: RTWD wc Water Chiller Alternate Refrigerant: R1234ze
Water Side Data Base Alt. SI Units Base Alt. IP Units Ratio | Diff
Evaporator (shell & tube)
fluid
flow rate 1928.0 1416.6 L/hr 509 374 gpm 0.735
T entering 9.4 9.4 °C 48.9 49.0 °F 0.1°F
T leaving 6.7 6.6 °C 44.0 44.0 °F 0.0°F
pressure drop 121 71 kPa 17.5 10.2 psid 0.585
Condenser (shell & tube)
fluid
flow rate 2408.9 1773.7 L/hr 636 469 gpm 0.736
T entering 29.5 29.5 °C 85.0 85.0 °F 0.0°F
T leaving 32.2 32.3 °C 90.0 90.1 °F 0.0°F
pressure drop 140 81 kPa 20.3 11.7 psid 0.578
Refrigerant Side
T (°C) P (kPa) T (°C) P (kPa) T (°F) P (psia) T (°F) P (psia)
Compressor (screw)
suction 3.9 338 4.4 251 39.0 49.0 39.9 36.4
discharge 51.2 943 44.8 694 124.2 136.8 112.7 100.6
dchrg SH | Pratio 14.0 8.5 25.2 2.79 15.24 2.77
Condenser (shell & tube w/integral subcooler)
inlet/shell 51.2 943 44.8 694 124.2 136.8 112.7 100.6
shell dewpoint 36.4 35.6 97.6 96.1
shell bubblept 36.4 35.6 97.6 96.1
subcooler outlet 32.5 911 32.4 671 90.5 132.1 90.3 97.3
subcooling (local) 3.5 2.8 6.2 5.0
Expansion Device (EXV)
inlet 32.5 911 32.4 671 90.5 132.1 90.3 97.3
Evaporator (shell & tube)
inlet/shell 4.3 341 4.4 254 39.7 49.5 39.9 36.8
outlet/shell 4.3 341 4.4 254 39.7 49.5 39.9 36.8
Refrigerant Side Base Alt. SI Units Base Alt. IP Units Ratio
suction line pressure drop 3.2 2.6 kPa 0.46 0.38 psid 0.83
discharge line pressure drop 20 15 kPa 2.90 2.14 psid 0.74
08‐Nov‐2012
water
water
Base Alt. Base Alt.
Appendix B
Data Points Collected at Standard Operating Conditions
Low GWP AREP SYSTEM DROP‐IN TEST DATA FORM page 1
Manufacturer: Trane
Basic Information
Alternative Refrigerant ARM‐42a Arkema
Alternative Lubricant Type and ISO Viscosity POE – 68
Baseline Refrigerant R134a
Baseline Lubricant Type and ISO Viscosity POE – 68
Make and Model of System RTWD water‐cooled chiller (running first of two refrigerant circuits
Nominal Capacity and Type of System 230 nominal tons (preproduction prototype for lab verification)
Comparison Data Base Alt. SI Units Base Alt. IP Units Ratio
Mode (heating/cooling) cooling
Compressor Type screw compressor (high lift version)
Compressor Displacement m³/hr cfm
Nominal Motor Size kW hp
Motor Speed (60 Hz) Hz
Expansion Device Type electronic expansion valve
Lubricant Charge L gal
Refrigerant Charge 81.6 79.4 kg 180 175 lbm 0.972
Composition (at Cmpr Suct)
6.7 6.7 °C 43.98 43.99 °F 0.01
1928 1856 L/min 509.3 490.4 gpm 0.963
Flow rate (tons × 2) 5.2 5.0 L/min∙kW 2.41 2.34 gpm/ton 0.973
29.5 29.5 °C 85.0 85.0 °F 0.0
2409 2319 L/min 636 613 gpm 0.963
Flow rate (tons × 2) 6.5 6.3 L/min∙kW 3.01 2.93 gpm/ton 0.973
Capacity 371.9 367.9 kW 105.7 104.6 tons 0.989
Power to Compressor 86.0 88.1 kW 86.0 88.1 kW 1.024
COP or EER (compressor only) 4.33 4.18 [] 14.76 14.25 Btu/W∙hr 0.966
Refrigerant Mass Flow Rate 8,596 9,825 kg/hr 18,950 21,660 lbm/hr 1.143
Refrig Flow @ Cmpr Suction 518.2 526.1 m³/hr 305.0 309.7 cfm 1.015
Other System Changes
The unit tested has non‐standard evaporator tubes (alternate high performance design).
The unit tested has non‐standard condenser tubes (90/10 cupronickel).
Only one of two refrigerant circuits was run due to limited availability of some refrigerants.
System Data Base Alt. Ratio
Degradation Coefficient
Seasonal Energy Efficiency Ration – SEER
Heating Seasonal Performance Factor – HSPF
12 3.1
Chilled
Water
Leaving Temp
Flow rate
Cooling
Water
Entering Temp
Flow rate
08‐Nov‐2012
Appendix B
Data Points Collected at Standard Operating Conditions
Low GWP AREP SYSTEM DROP‐IN TEST DATA FORM page 2
Type of System: RTWD wc Water Chiller Alternate Refrigerant: ARM‐42a
Water Side Data Base Alt. SI Units Base Alt. IP Units Ratio | Diff
Evaporator (shell & tube)
fluid
flow rate 1928.0 1856.3 L/hr 509 490 gpm 0.963
T entering 9.4 9.5 °C 48.9 49.0 °F 0.1°F
T leaving 6.7 6.7 °C 44.0 44.0 °F 0.0°F
pressure drop 121 111 kPa 17.5 16.1 psid 0.919
Condenser (shell & tube)
fluid
flow rate 2408.9 2318.9 L/hr 636 613 gpm 0.963
T entering 29.5 29.5 °C 85.0 85.0 °F 0.0°F
T leaving 32.2 32.3 °C 90.0 90.2 °F 0.2°F
pressure drop 140 130 kPa 20.3 18.9 psid 0.932
Refrigerant Side
T (°C) P (kPa) T (°C) P (kPa) T (°F) P (psia) T (°F) P (psia)
Compressor (screw)
suction 3.9 338 4.1 368 39.0 49.0 39.4 53.4
discharge 51.2 943 46.5 989 124.2 136.8 115.7 143.4
dchrg SH | Pratio 14.0 7.7 25.2 2.79 13.92 2.69
Condenser (shell & tube w/integral subcooler)
inlet/shell 51.2 943 46.5 989 124.2 136.8 115.7 143.4
shell dewpoint 36.4 37.9 97.6 100.2
shell bubblept 36.4 37.8 97.6 100.1
subcooler outlet 32.5 911 32.5 948 90.5 132.1 90.4 137.5
subcooling (local) 3.5 4.6 6.2 8.3
Expansion Device (EXV)
inlet 32.5 911 32.5 948 90.5 132.1 90.4 137.5
Evaporator (shell & tube)
inlet/shell 4.3 341 4.5 372 39.7 49.5 40.1 53.9
outlet/shell 4.3 341 4.5 372 39.7 49.5 40.2 53.9
Refrigerant Side Base Alt. SI Units Base Alt. IP Units Ratio
suction line pressure drop 3.2 3.6 kPa 0.46 0.53 psid 1.16
discharge line pressure drop 20 22 kPa 2.90 3.24 psid 1.12
08‐Nov‐2012
water
water
Base Alt. Base Alt.