test 2

23
Sebastian Rhodes Stampa UN Regional Civil Military Coordination Officer OCHA Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific Contact: [email protected] Kathmandu 02.09.09 OCHA Civil Military Coordination in Disaster Response and Complex Emergencies

Upload: bed-rock

Post on 07-Mar-2016

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Test 2 test

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Test 2

Sebastian Rhodes StampaUN Regional Civil Military Coordination OfficerOCHA Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific

Contact: [email protected]

Kathmandu 02.09.09

OCHA

Civil Military Coordination in Disaster Response and Complex

Emergencies

Page 2: Test 2

INTRODUCTION

1. OCHA’s Civil Military Coordination Service (CMCS).

2. What is Civil Military Coordination?

3. Why do we need to do it?

4. What are the main Challenges to Civil Military Co ordination?

5. Military Support to the Civil Powers – Civil Milit ary Coordination at the National Level.

6. Civil Military Coordination in Disaster Relief Op erations.

7. Civil-Military Coordination in Complex Emergencie s.

8. Conclusion.

Page 3: Test 2

UN OCHA Civil-Military Coordination Section (CMCS)

Who we are :

� OCHA – Geneva, Emergency Services Branch� 12 Staff in Geneva� Regional Civil Military Coordination Officers

What we do:

� Focal Point for UN Civil-Military Coordination� Humanitarian Common Service� Guidelines, Strategy, and Tools� Deploy as CMCoord Officers� Support to Exercises� Training/Advocacy

Page 4: Test 2

UN Humanitarian Civil Military Coordination:

The essential dialogue and interaction between civilian and

military actors in humanitarian emergencies necessary

to protect and promote humanitarian principles, avoid

competition, minimize inconsistency, and when appropriate

pursue common goals..

The key elements are information sharing, task division, and planning. Basic strategies range from coexistence to cooperation. Coordination is a shared responsibilityshared responsibility facilitated by liaison and common training.

UN CMCoord – What is it?

Page 5: Test 2

CMCoord - WHY DO WE NEED TO DO IT?

Increasing Role for Military Forces in Disaster Res ponse : The scale of the Indian-Ocean Earthquake and Tsunami and the South Asia Earthquake disasters led to an unprecedented level of assistance

being provided by national and international militaries to the affected States and humanitarian community. This assistance was central to the overall

relief efforts in quickly accessing hard-to-reach areas and filling many technical gaps that civilian capabilities were unable to immediately provide.

Page 6: Test 2

CMCoord - WHY DO WE NEED TO DO IT?

Shrinking Operational Environment : In most humanitarian emergencies (complex and natural disaster)

humanitarian responders will encounter armed actors. Now, more than ever before, there are likely to be multiple types of forces, including domestic,

foreign, international or multinational forces and when such actors are present there are also likely to be significant coordination challenges.

Page 7: Test 2

CMCoord – What are the Challenges?

If we do work with the military there are:

Coordination challenges in the realms of security, medical evacuation, logistics, transport, communications, information m anagement;

Challenges include minimizing the competition for s carce resources such as ports, supply routes, airfields and other logist ics infrastructure.

Page 8: Test 2

CMCoord – What are the Challenges?

In addition, armed actors are likely to seek to est ablish relationships with the civilian population and in many cases attempt t o provide them

assistance.

In some cases ( Natural Disasters ), military forces can provide useful resources and support to the affected country or re gion, population or

humanitarian actors.

In other cases ( Complex Emergencies ), the perceived association with the armed actors can compromise humanitarian efforts an d may pose an

additional security threat.

Page 9: Test 2

CMCoord – What are the benefits?

• Logistical Assets : Logistical support from strategic airlift to tactical fixed wing and rotary airlift, sealift, overland transportation and related support mechanisms and personnel.

• Medical Assistance : Field Hospitals, technical expertise and equipment, MEDIVAC etc.

• Communications Support : Specialised communications capabilities and potential support to humanitarian operations.

• Manpower : Perhaps the largest potential provider of highly disciplined and well trained manpower at very short notice to support Humanitarian operations.

• Security : An clear role in providing protection for humanitarian aid workers as required.

Page 10: Test 2

Dealing with these challenges requires training, appropriate experience and in

some cases dedicated staff.

Page 11: Test 2

National Civil Military Coordination

At the national level, in many countries throughout the region, Armed Forces

have had long experience in responding to disasters. In most cases they act in support of the Civil Authority’s Disaster Management and Response Systems.

Key to their best use is:

• Establishment and Maintenance of Regular Contact;

• Clear understanding of capabilities and capacities (both ways);

• Integration into National Disaster Management Systems;

• Clearly defined role in National Disaster Response Plans ;

• Regular Joint Exercises (CPX, FTX).

Many National Disaster Management and Response Organisations employ either serving or former military staff in key roles in order to facilitate liaison.

Page 12: Test 2

An Example of Military Integration into a National Disaster Management Structure

Appointed Senior Government

Minister (PM?)

Armed Forces HQ

DIV

BDE

REGT

National Disaster

Management Committee

Regional Disaster

Management Committee

District Disaster

Management Committee

Line Ministries (National)

Line Ministries (Regional)

Line Ministries (District)

Line Ministries (Local)Local Disaster

Management Committee

Impacted Area

Page 13: Test 2
Page 14: Test 2

The Oslo Guidelines

To establish the basic framework for formalizing and improving the effectiveness and efficiency of the use of military teams and expertise in international disaster

relief.

The Scope of the Oslo Guidelines

1. The Oslo Guidelines address the use of MCDA follo wing natural disasters, technological or environmental emergencies in times of peace.

2. They provide non-binding guidance and a model leg al framework for international military and civil defence assista nce to disaster relief operations

3. Relief organizations are encouraged to adopt key principles and concepts for the use of MCDA.

Page 15: Test 2

Core Principles

Humanity : Human suffering must be addressed wherever it is found, with particular

attention to the most vulnerable in the population, such as children, women and the elderly. The dignity and rights of all victims must be respected and protected.

Neutrality : Humanitarian assistance must be provided without engaging in hostilities or taking sides in controversies of a political, religious or ideological nature.

Impartiality : Humanitarian assistance must be provided without discriminating as to ethnic origin, gender, nationality, political opinions, race or religion. Relief of the suffering must be guided solely by needs and priority must be given to the most urgent cases of distress.

Do No Harm: Considerations on civil-military coordination must be guided by a commitment

to ‘do no harm ’. Humanitarian agencies must ensure at the policy and operational levels that any potential civil-military coordination will not contribute to further the conflict, nor harm or endanger the beneficiaries of humanitarian assistance.

Page 16: Test 2
Page 17: Test 2

Civil-Military Relationship in Complex Emergencies - An IASC Reference Paper 28

June 2004

AIM

Highlights, in a generic manner, the nature and character of civil-military relations in complex emergencies.

Reviews some fundamental humanitarian principles and concepts that must be upheld when coordinating with the military.

Makes practical considerations for humanitarian workers engaged in civil-military coordination

Page 18: Test 2

US Japan Civil Military Disaster Assistance Workshop Tokyo

Perception of Humanitarian Action

The delivery of humanitarian assistance to all populations in need must beneutral and impartial – it must come without political or military conditions

and humanitarian staff must not take sides in disputes or political positions.This will have a bearing on the credibility and independence ofhumanitarian efforts in general.

*Any civil-military coordination must also be mindful not to jeopardize thelongstanding local network and trust that humanitarian agencies have created

and maintained.

Key Principles and Concepts

Page 19: Test 2

US Japan Civil Military Disaster Assistance Workshop Tokyo

Security of Humanitarian Personnel

Any perception that humanitarian actors may have become affiliatedwith the military forces within a specific situation could impactnegatively on the security of humanitarian staff and their ability toaccess vulnerable populations.

Key Principles and Concepts

Page 20: Test 2

US Japan Civil Military Disaster Assistance Workshop Tokyo

The independence, flexibility, and freedom of action necessary to gain access and provide assistance to beneficiaries in a humanitarian emergency. It is achieved through acceptance and adherence to

the humanitarian principles.

Humanitarian Space

Page 21: Test 2

These Guidelines are Available at:

http://ochaonline.un.org/cmcs/guidelines

Page 22: Test 2

Conclusion

Page 23: Test 2