terrorism
TRANSCRIPT
Terrorist objectives, methods, and their psychological impact
To affect political, social, economic, or religious change through the use of fear and intimidation◦unable to accomplish objectives through
legitimate or democratic process◦unable to directly confront their
opposition militarily
Terror involves inflicting fear and anxiety on the victim(s)
Terror can be either goal oriented or it can be for any unnecessary reason.
PRINCIPLE: A special type of principle followed by the group of people.
A person does not follow terrorism, but his path is called terrorism after the judgement done by other third parties.
It stops the developmental activities. Social disorder. Invites Violence. Creates Fear. Mass destruction. Affects economical. Death of innocent people.
To instill “terror” in target audience◦ by using the most terrifying means available,
including kidnapping, assassination, bomb blasts, etc.
◦ by affecting many more people than directly affected by physical actions media and government-response play a critical role
in the impact of terrorism
Hard targets◦ high-ranking government officials◦ military bases◦ fortified police stations (e.g., Northern Ireland)
Soft targets◦ individual civilians◦ shopping areas◦ schools◦ cultural, sporting, & religious venues
Terrorist tactics probably work best against democracies, where targeting civilian populations has the greatest effect (i.e., civilians elect the government which sets the policy the terrorists wish to change)
209Killed
1,202 physically injured
9,000+ psychologically ‘injured’
10,000’s terrorized
178Killed
1000’sphysically injured
10000’s psychologically ‘injured’
100,000’s terrorized
3,025Killed
1,000’s physically injured
10,000+ psychologically ‘injured’
A nation terrorized
Response to terrorism is determined by social cognition and other dynamics◦ Madrid train bombing (11 March 2004)
elect new government withdraw troops from Iraq
◦ 9/11 attack on America solidify government support Bush doctrine: hunt & kill
End of Part I
What are the methods of terrorists? (e.g. targeting civilian populations)
Why do terrorists use the tactics of terrorism?
Considerations for developing effective counter-terrorist strategies
“One person’s terrorist is another person’s freedom fighter”◦ organized terrorism is seldom rooted in mental
illness there is often some legitimate goal for the terrorist
organization there is usually a broad support base
◦ but very few terrorists are open to compromise
Most terrorists seek national or regional change
Some terrorists seek global change◦ most have specific, tangible objectives (even if
irrational)◦ a few have apocalyptic motives
Their demands usually involve radical change in the status quo◦ uniting Northern Ireland with the Republic of
Ireland in the south◦ formation of the state of Palestine◦ overthrow of the secular Egyptian government◦ establishment of an Islamic state in Iraq &
removal of Western influence
The more one ‘invests’ in a cause, the stronger that cause is psychologically defended
The transition from activist to terrorist (and the willingness to use violent methods) involves psychological changes that tend to dichotomize the ‘world’
Show the terrorists to be irrational fanatics who threaten global peace and stability
Develop allies who have a common interest in neutralizing the terrorist threat
Develop a clear multinational plan for combating terrorism
Minimize social-political conditions that spawn terrorism
Isolate the terrorists Divide political factions Rally allies against terrorism Harsh and severe retaliatory action Temper media coverage
There are many cases in the 20th Century where terrorist tactics were effectively used to force change or to right an injustice◦ Republic of Ireland (although the Northern
counties remain in dispute)◦ State of Israel (although national
boundaries remain in dispute)◦ De-colonization & sovereignty of African
nations
1921
1948
1950s &
1960s
Diplomacy when possible, but◦ unlikely to work in most situations◦ reinforces terrorist tactics
Undermine terrorist support Direct physical confrontation
◦ hunt and kill◦ neutralize “breeding grounds”
Temper media coverage
Conditions have changed radically ◦ national sovereignty is no longer the primary force
behind many terrorist organizations ◦ some terrorist organizations seek global changes
extending well beyond their social, political, economic, or religious spheres of influence (e.g., a “New World Order”)
Diplomacy when possible, but◦ unlikely to work in most situations◦ reinforces terrorist tactics
Undermine terrorist support
Diminish social-economic conditions that present legitimate grievances◦ food and economic aid◦ combat social, religious, economic, and political
suppression Provide alternative, rational plan for
resolving the conflict
Neutralize support base◦ foreign governments◦ popular/civilian sympathizers◦ other terrorist organizations
Exploit differences and conflicts among individual factions of the terrorist movement
Consider supporting factions willing to adopt a non-terrorist approach to achieving objectives
Diplomacy when possible, but◦ unlikely to work in most situations◦ reinforces terrorist tactics
Undermine terrorist support Direct physical confrontation
◦ hunt and kill◦ destroy or neutralize “breeding grounds”
Minimize social-political conditions that spawn terrorism (first priority from list of responses)
Covert operations when feasible Direct military action when appropriate (e.g.
Bush doctrine)
Diplomacy when possible, but◦ unlikely to work in most situations◦ reinforces terrorist tactics
Undermine terrorist support Direct physical confrontation
◦ hunt and kill◦ neutralize “breeding grounds”
Temper media coverage
The media are (mostly unwilling) allies of the terrorists
The media need to self-censor coverage and not just push the most sensationalistic story◦ confirm story & factual information◦ present clear & balanced perspective◦ consider impact of coverage
Terrorism is a global problem that is not going away without direct action◦ terrorism affects many people far removed from
the terrorist activity◦ terrorists seldom compromise
An effective response to terrorism requires decisive and often harsh action, uncharacteristic of the traditional American Psyche
What terrorist groups were active in previous generations? Did they achieve their goals?
What are some of the major terrorist groups active today? Which are the most serious threat worldwide?