tennessee opportunities in energy efficiency market survey 2013

1

Tennessee Energy Education Initiative Market Survey

July 17, 2013

2 2

Objectives In conjunction with the Tennessee Energy Education Initiative, Shelton Group conducted a comprehensive survey of Tennessee businesses in selected industries to better understand the participation propensities for energy efficiency and renewable energy initiatives and to determine key motivators and drivers within market segments. The survey also sought to validate the best targets, content/messaging, and channels for program participation as determined from the market overview. Survey objectives will include the following:

• Assess overall awareness of energy efficiency, behavior drivers, and attitudes related to energy efficiency improvements

• Determine which types of energy efficiency improvements have been completed and which they think they need/plan to do

• Determine motivations for conducting energy efficiency improvements

• Gauge reaction to the program and financing options

• Secure feedback to messaging and/or program content direction

3 3

Methodology

• Telephone study of TN organizations in selected industries (see next slide for distribution of interviews by industry)

• Sample list initially pulled from Hoovers database, and supplemented with lists from Hoovers Premier and MelissaData

• To qualify for the study, respondents had to be primary decision makers or influencers for energy-related facility improvement

• Interviewing conducted May 6–30, 2013

• Average interview length of 11 minutes

• 200 completes with margin of error +/- 7.1%

4 4

Organization characteristics

East 40%

Middle 38%

West 23%

n=200

Region

Locally 89%

Nationally 10%

Internationally 1%

Decision Making

57% 26%

7% 10% One

Two-Four Five-Nine 10+

52%

15%

33% 10 to 49 50 to 99 100+

Organization Characteristics

Number of Facilities in TN Number of Employees

*Median sq ft = 36k

6%

19%

38%

17% 16%

Less than 2.5k

2.5-10k 10-50k 50-100k 100k+

Square Footage

Own 71%

Lease 29%

% Own vs. Lease Facility

6 6

Average Age:

52

Respondent Characteristics

Influencer 47%

Decision Maker 53% Male 76%

Female 24%

n=200

7

Executive Summary

8 8

Importance of Energy

• This study included a survey of 13 key industries within Tennessee. Overall, we found that eight out of ten organizations consider energy consumption important to daily business purchase choices and activities.

– Respondents in organizations with more than one facility were more likely to consider energy consumption and conservation important than those with only one facility (83% vs. 73%).

– In contrast, organizations in newer facilities (less than five years old) were more likely to consider energy consumption and conservation unimportant than those with older facilities (38% vs. 5%).

9 9

Energy Efficiency of Current Facilities

• About two-thirds of the TN organizations surveyed consider their current facility(ies) energy efficient.

– Regionally, organizations in East TN (75%) and Middle TN (63%) were more likely to consider their facilities energy efficient than those in West TN (51%).

– Organizations in facilities over 20 years old were more likely to consider their facilities inefficient than those with newer facilities (19% vs. 3%).

• Average number of completed EE improvements per organization: 3.3

– Facility owners were more likely to have made EE improvements than leasers (3.6 vs. 2.8)

– Companies with multiple facilities (3.5) vs. one facility (3.2)

– Average EE Updates by Sector: Education (4.3); Manufacturing & Distribution (3.4); Business Services (3.1); Healthcare (3.1); Hospitality/Retail (3.0)

10 10

Energy-Related Priorities and Improvements

• While 11 of the 13 industries surveyed considered lighting a priority, more than half also listed HVAC as a top energy priority.

– Unlike the other industries, respondents in the food manufacturing industry considered a number of other priorities important: cogeneration (40%), compressed air systems (40%), interior lighting (40%), manufacturing furnaces (40%), refrigeration (40%), and water heating (40%).

• Organizational improvements generally paralleled industry priorities, with 76% of those surveyed reporting that they have already installed lighting improvements, and 56% having installed a more efficient mechanical or HVAC system.

• Energy management, insulation, and renewable energy top the list of activities that companies recognize they need to do.

11 11

Top Motivators/Drivers

• “Spending less on energy and more on other priorities” and “save money” are the top reasons cited for participating in energy-related improvements.

– Facilities that were 20+ years old were less likely to select “save money” than were newer facilities (22% vs. 39%).

– Regionally, organizations in West TN (42%) and Middle TN (31%) were more likely to select “save money” than those in East TN (19%).

12 12

Key Challenges/Barriers

• Overall, “lack of budgets/funds” and “lack of time/too busy/other priorities” top the list of challenges/barriers.

– When it comes to size, however, facilities that were under 50k square footage were more likely to say their organization “isn’t sure what to do to save more energy” than were larger organizations (30% vs. 8%).

– In addition, influencers were more likely to say “implementing energy-related improvements is too complicated, inconvenient, and/or too disruptive” than were decision makers (23% vs. 12%).

13 13

Reaction to Funding Options

• When asked, “If there was a program that offered 5-year loans with a 2% interest rate for energy-related improvements and retrofit projects ranging from $20,000 to $5 million, how would this impact your plans for facility improvement?,” 37% of TN organizations reported they would be more likely to complete facility improvements if they were offered this program.

• In addition, when asked, “If there were a program that offered 10-year loans with a 5% interest rate for solar generation systems, how would this impact your plans for installing such a system?,” 26% of TN organizations indicate they would be more likely to install solar if this program was offered to them.

14 14

Sector Prioritization • Developed a scoring that considers:

– # companies / with 10+ employees

– % with multiple facilities / facilities with 50k+ sq. ft.

– % owned vs. leased

– Avg. number of completed and likely improvements

– % perceived inefficient

– % likely to act with financing

15 15

Lighting and HVAC top the list of energy-related priorities.

4% 3%

6% 7% 8% 9% 9% 9% 10% 11% 13%

15% 19% 20%

24% 34%

37% 43%

56% 67%

Other energy-related priorities Small motors/conveyors

Solar Manufacturing furnaces

Co-generation equipment Fleet cars/trucks/buses

Refrigeration Reflective/cool roofing

Compressed air systems Data center power and cooling

Geothermal heating/cooling PC power management solutions

Building envelope upgrades Water heating

Energy management/system monitoring Lighting (exterior)

NET Energy/PC Power Management HVAC

Lighting (interior) NET Lighting (interior/exterior)

Q13 - What are your organization's top three energy-related priorities?

n=200

Respondents w/newer facilities (less than five years old) were more likely to select PC power management (63% vs. 15% overall).

Respondents who lease were more likely to select energy management systems than those who own (35% vs.19%).

16 16

Companies surveyed have completed an average of 3.3 of these improvements.

13%

19%

30%

33%

34%

37%

38%

56%

76%

29%

27%

9%

29%

32%

17%

16%

24%

14%

Added a renewable energy generation system

Installed a reflective / cool roof

Installed more efficient manufacturing equipment

Added insulation, air sealing or ductwork

Added an energy management system or controls to make the facility more energy efficient

Installed a more efficient water heating system

Installed more efficient appliances or refrigeration

Installed a more efficient mechanical and/or HVAC system

Installed more energy-efficient light fixtures, controls or occupancy sensors

Q18a - Which improvement(s) has your organization completed on your primary facility in the past five years? Q18b - Does your primary facility need any of these improvements? Q18c -

Does your organization plan to do this in the next 12 months?

Already completed Need to do

n=200

4%

6%

4%

4%

3%

12%

2%

5%

7%

Plan to do

17 17

While 11 of the 13 industries surveyed considered lighting a priority, more than half also listed HVAC as a top energy priority.

Industry Sector (n size) Most frequently mentioned energy-related priority

Real estate (8) Interior lighting (75%), exterior lighting (63%) Retail (30) Interior lighting (67%), exterior lighting (43%) Transportation and logistics (15) Interior lighting (60%), exterior lighting (40%) Chemicals and plastics (10) Interior lighting (60%), exterior lighting (40%) Wholesale distribution (20) Interior lighting (60%), exterior lighting (35%) Automotive (6) Interior lighting (50%), exterior lighting (50%) Healthcare (30) Interior lighting (60%), HVAC (53%) Restaurants (3) HVAC (100%), interior lighting (67%) Hotels and motels (7) HVAC (71%), interior lighting (43%) Private education (30) HVAC (70%), interior lighting (47%) Business services (26) HVAC (62%), interior lighting (58%) Technology and electronics (10) HVAC (50%)

Food manufacturing (5) Cogeneration (40%), compressed air systems (40%), interior lighting (40%), manufacturing furnaces (40%), refrigeration (40%), water heating (40%)

Lighting

HVAC

Other

18 18

Messaging Effectively: Leveraging Motivators/Drivers to Address Challenges/Barriers by Industry

Industry Sector (n size)

Motivators/Drivers Challenges/Barriers Spend

Less/More on other Priorities Save Money

Lack of Budget/Funds

Payback Period Other

Retail (30) Private education (30) Business Services (26) Healthcare (30) Automotive (6) Chemicals and plastics (10) Food manufacturing (5) Restaurants (3) Transportation and logistics (15) Technology and electronics (10) Real estate (8) Hotels and motels (7) Wholesale distribution (20)

19

Conclusions/Recommendations

20 20

Moving TN Organizations Down the Path

The easiest path to encourage improvements should start with/parallel industry priorities:

• Energy-related priorities

– 11 of the 13 industries surveyed consider lighting a top priority for their company.

– 7 of the 13 consider HVAC a top priority.

• Facility improvements

– 76% have already improved the lighting while 56% have improved the HVAC.

21 21

Moving TN Organizations Down the Path

RECOMMENDATION:

For companies new to energy improvements, emphasize most common first steps (already perceived needs): lighting and HVAC.

For those who are further along the path and have already integrated these improvements, focus on “gaps” that companies recognized as needing to improve: energy management (32%), insulation (29%)

22 22

Packaging/Bundling Opportunity

• While more than one-third of the organizations surveyed considered energy/PC management as a top priority and 32% recognize a need to do this improvement, only 3% plan to make this improvement.

RECOMMENDATION:

• Consider packaging or bundling funding for energy/PC power management improvements with lighting, HVAC and insulation projects to speed adoption of these systems which will increase 1 behavior change and compound impact.

• Demonstrate the effectiveness of bundling these systems with improvements with stats on increased savings/higher ROI and shorter payback period.

23 23

Encourage interest in renewable energy 29% say they think they need a renewable generation system and it’s a higher priority initiative (7% likely) than many others.

26% said they would likely undertake a renewable energy project with financing, as described.

RECOMMENDATION:

Prioritize solar and other renewable energy project messaging and include information on state tax incentives for renewable energy systems.

24

Appendix: Detailed Findings

25

Organizational Characteristics

26 26

Geographic distribution of interviews closely matched regional patterns for focus industries

East 40%

Middle 38%

West 23%

n=200

27 27

The majority of organizations surveyed were housed in a single facility within Tennessee.

1%

11%

7%

26%

57%

Don't know / Not sure

Ten or more

Five to nine

Two to four

One

Q7 - How many facilities / locations does your organization have in Tennessee?

n=200

While not statistically significant, we observed that organizations in the following industries were more likely to have multiple locations: • Food manufacturing • Healthcare • Real estate

28 28

Decision making for energy-related improvements primarily occurs locally.

1%

10%

90%

Internationally - by decision makers in another country

Nationally - by out-of-state decision makers

Locally - by TN owners / decision makers

Q8 - Where would the decision-making for energy-related improvements for your organization primarily occur?

n=200

Organizations in the hotel industry were more likely to say decision-making for energy-related improvements primarily occurs nationally (29% vs.10% overall).

29 29

More than half of the organizations surveyed employ fewer than 50 people.

1%

33%

15%

53%


100 or more

50 to 99

10 to 49

Q9 - How many people does your organization employ?

n=200

Organizations in the following industries were more likely to have 100+ employees: • Chemicals and plastics • Healthcare • Transportation & logistics • Education

30 30

Median square footage of facilities was 36k.

6%

16%

17%

38%

19%

6%


More than 100,000 square feet

50,001 to 100,000 square feet



Less than 2,500 square feet

Q15 - What is the square footage of space in this facility?

n=200

31 31

Fewer than one-third of organizations surveyed lease their facility.

29%

71%

Organization leases facility

Organization owns facility

Q16 - Does your organization own or lease this facility?

n=200

Companies in manufacturing, transportation and logistics, hotel, and education industries were somewhat more likely to own their facility, while those in the healthcare, real estate, wholesale distribution, and services sectors were somewhat more likely to lease.

32

Respondent Characteristics

33 33

More than half of those surveyed were primary decision makers for energy-related improvements.

48%

53%

You are an influencer for energy-related improvements.

You are a primary decision maker for energy-related improvements.

Q5 - Which of the following best describes you?

n=200

Not surprisingly, primary decision makers were more likely to be an owner, partner, president, CEO, or COO.

34 34

3% 5% 5% 5%

2% 15%

4% 11%

2% 10%

4% 12%

26%

Some other position Some other manager

Plant manager Construction or maintenance manager

Energy manager Facilities manager

Purchasing or procurement manager Director

Public administrator CFO, comptroller, VP of Finance, etc.

Chief Operations Officer President or CEO Owner or partner

Q6 - Which one of these best describes your position?

n=200

All respondents were either decision makers or influencers for energy-related improvements.

35 35

More than three-quarters of those surveyed were male.

Male 76%

Female 24%

Q21 - Gender

n=200

While not statistically significant, there was a somewhat higher proportion of women acting as decision makers/influencers for energy-related improvements within the following industries:

• Healthcare (27%)

• Education (33%)

• Restaurants (33%)

• Services (31%)

• Technology & Electronics (30%)

36 36

Median age of respondents was 52 years.

2%

11%

29%

31%

16%

12%

1%

Refused

65 years or more

55–64 years

45–54 years

35–44 years

25–34 years

18–24 years

Q22 - Would you please tell me your age?

n=200

While not statistically significant, respondents in the following industries were somewhat younger on average than those in other industries: • Healthcare • Hotels • Real estate • Restaurants

37

Attitudes Toward Energy Efficiency

38 38

Almost eight out of ten organizations surveyed consider energy usage important.

8%

16%

77%

Unimportant

Neither important nor unimportant

Important

Q10 - How important is energy consumption and conservation in your organization's daily business purchase choices and activities?

n=200

Respondents in organizations with more than one facility were more likely to consider energy consumption important than those with only one facility (83% vs. 73%). In contrast, organizations in newer facilities (less than five years old) were more likely to consider energy consumption unimportant (38% vs. 5%). While not statistically significant, respondents in the technology & electronics segment were more likely to consider energy consumption unimportant.

39 39

About two-thirds consider their facility efficient.

1%

13%

21%

65%


Inefficient

Neither efficient nor inefficient

Efficient

Q11 - Overall, how would you rate the energy efficiency of your current facility(ies)?

n=200

Regionally, organizations in East TN (75%) and Middle TN (63%) were more likely to consider their facilities energy efficient than those in West TN (51%). Organizations in facilities over 20 years old were more likely to consider their facilities inefficient than those in newer facilities (19% vs. 3%). While not statistically significant, respondents in the technology & electronics segment were more likely to consider their facility inefficient (30% vs. 13% overall).

40

Energy-Related Priorities

41 41

Improvements by Sector: Lighting Fixtures/Controls

• Overall, 76% of the industries surveyed have completed this improvement. Of the energy-related improvements measured, this one had the highest completion levels across the 13 industries surveyed, with the exception of the technology and electronics sector in which installation of a more efficient mechanical and/or HVAC system had the highest completion rate.

• The business service industry also had a somewhat lower level of completion of this improvement compared to other industries (58% vs. 76% overall).

42 42

Improvements by Sector: Mechanical/HVAC System

• Overall, 56% of the industries surveyed have completed this improvement in the past five years. While not statistically significant, there were lower completion rates for this improvement in the automotive industry (17%) and in the real estate industry (38%).

• Several industries had above average completion rates:

– Hotels (100%)

– Transportation and logistics (80%)

– Technology and electronics (80%)

43 43

Improvements by Sector: Appliances/Refrigeration

• Overall, 38% of the industries surveyed have completed this improvement in the past five years.

• Several industries had above average completion rates for this type of improvement:

– Food manufacturing (80%)

– Real estate (75%)

– Hotel (71%)

– Restaurants (67%)

44 44

Improvements by Sector: Water Heating


• Two of the industries had below average completion rates for this improvement: wholesale distribution (5%) and technology and electronics (20%).

• Both hotels (57%) and education (57%) industries had above average completion rates for this type of improvement.

45 45

Improvements by Sector: Energy Management


• Respondents in the chemicals/plastics industry (70%), education industry (60%), and transportation industries (53%) reported above average completion rates for this type of improvement.

• Industries with below average completion rates for this improvement included: retail (13%) and technology & electronics (10%).

• Also, although we only spoke with 3 restaurants, none of them had completed this improvement.

46 46

Improvements by Sector: Insulation


• Hotels (71%), restaurants (67%), and food manufacturing (60%) were more likely to have completed this type of improvement.

• Industries with below average completion rates for this improvement included: transportation & logistics (20%), retail (20%) and technology & electronics (20%).

• Also, although we only spoke with 6 respondents in the automotive industry, none of them had completed this improvement.

47 47

Energy management, insulation, and renewable energy top the list of activities companies think they need to do.

9%

14%

16%

17%

24%

27%

29%

29%

32%

Install more efficient manufacturing equipment

Install more energy-efficient light fixtures, controls or occupancy sensors

Install more efficient appliances or refrigeration

Install a more efficient water heating system

Install a more efficient mechanical and/or HVAC system

Install a reflective / cool roof

Add a renewable energy generation system

Add insulation, air sealing or ductwork

Add an energy management system or controls to make the facility more energy efficient

Q18b - Does your primary facility need any of these improvements? Q18c - Does your organization plan to do this in the next 12 months?

Need to do

n=200

3%

12%

7%

5%

6%

4%

4%

4%

2%

Plan to do

This isn’t a priority, however.

48

Motivators/Drivers

49 49

Spending less on energy and saving money are the top reasons cited for improvements.

1%

2%

2%

2%

2%

3%

4%

6%

7%

7%

29%

39%

To help offset future rate increases

To reduce greenhouse gas emissions

To satisfy customer or market expectations

Some other reason

To protect the environment and save natural resources

To accomplish a corporate objective or directive

To protect our nation's economy and reduce …

To make the facility more comfortable

To get more control over energy usage and costs

To reduce energy waste

To save money

To spend less on energy and more on other priorities

Q17 - What would be your one top reason for your organization to participate in energy-related improvements?

n=200

Facilities that were 20+ years old were less likely to select “save money” than were newer facilities (22% vs. 39%). Regionally, organizations in West TN (42%) and Middle TN (31%) were more likely to select “save money” than those in East TN(19%).

The focus is on “other priorities”

50 50

Top drivers/motivators by industry: Focus on spending less and saving money

Industry Sector (n size) Most frequently mentioned Automotive (6) Spend less on energy/more on other priorities (67%)

Real estate (8) Spend less on energy/more on other priorities (50%)

Retail (30) Spend less on energy/more on other priorities (47%)

Private education (30) Spend less on energy/more on other priorities (40%)

Business services (26) Spend less on energy/more on other priorities (42%)

Healthcare (30) Spend less on energy/more on other priorities (43%)

Technology and electronics (10) Spend less on energy/more on other priorities (40%)

Chemicals and plastics (10) Spend less on energy/more on other priorities (30%), save money (30%)

Hotels and motels (7) Spend less on energy/more on other priorities (29%), save money (29%)

Food manufacturing (5) Save money (80%)

Restaurants (3) Save money (67%)

Transportation and logistics (15) Save money (47%)

Wholesale distribution (20) Save money (35%)

Spend less on energy/ more on other priorities

Save Money

51 51

Detail on Top Drivers/Motivators by Sector While not statistically significant:

• Automotive industry respondents were even more likely to select “spend less on energy and more on other priorities” (67% vs. 39% overall).

• Those in real estate were even more likely to say “spend less on energy and more on other priorities” (50% vs. 39% overall).

• Hotel industry respondents were less likely to select “spend less on energy and more on other priorities” (29%) as were wholesale distributors (25%).

• Food manufacturing (80%) and restaurants (67%) were much more likely to select “save money” than respondents overall (29%).

• Transportation and logistics respondents were even more likely to say “save money” (47% vs. 29% overall).

• Education (17%) and service (19%) industry respondents less likely to select “save money.”

52 52

Additional Drivers/Motivators by Industry Sector

• Automotive respondents were more likely to select “to reduce energy waste” (17% vs. 7% overall).

• Healthcare (17%) and hotel (14%) respondents were more likely to select “To get more control over energy usage and costs” than respondents overall (7%).

• Food manufacturing respondents were more likely to select “To make the facility more comfortable during cold winter and hot summer months” (20% vs. 6% overall).

• Hotel respondents were more likely to select “To satisfy customer or market expectations” (29% vs. 2% overall).

53

Challenges/Barriers

54 54

Overall, lack of funding and other priorities top the list of challenges/barriers.

6%

6%

9%

17%

18%

23%

24%

26%

40%

50%

Some other reason

Not applicable/lease improvements not allowed or very unlikely

You don't plan to be in the facility very long.

Decision makers haven't considered it or don't believe it would really help much.

Implementing energy-related improvements is too complicated, inconvenient and/or too disruptive.

Your organization isn't sure what to do to save more energy.

The payback period on energy-related improvements is too long.

Your organization believes it has done all the energy-related improvements possible.

Lack of time/too busy/other priorities

Lack of budget/funds

Q12 - What would you say are the key challenges or barriers your organization faces in making energy-related improvements?

n=200

Influencers were more likely to say that implementing improvements is disruptive than were decision makers (23% vs. 12%).

Facilities that were under 50k square footage were more likely to say that they were uncertain what to do than larger facilities (30% vs. 8%).

55 55

Key barrier cited varied by industry, with lack of funds, payback period, and other priorities most frequently mentioned.

Industry Sector (n size) Most frequently mentioned

Restaurants (3) Lack of budget/funds (100%)

Private education (30) Lack of budget/funds (70%)

Business services (26) Lack of budget/funds (58%)

Healthcare (30) Lack of budget/funds (57%)

Transportation and logistics (15) Lack of budget/funds (47%)

Retail (30) Lack of budget/funds (47%)

Automotive (6) Lack of budget/funds (50%), payback period (50%)

Food manufacturing (5) Payback period (60%)

Chemicals and plastics (10) Payback period (50%)

Wholesale distribution (20) Lack of time/too busy/other priorities (65%)

Real estate (8) Lack of time/too busy/other priorities (63%)

Technology and electronics (10) Lack of time/too busy/other priorities (50%)

Hotels and motels (7) Decision makers (43%)

Funds

Payback

Other

56

Reaction to Financing Options

57 57

37% of TN organizations would be more likely to complete facility improvements if they were offered this program.

24%

40%

25%

12%

I don't know and am still undecided about improvement plans.

It does not impact my plans at all. I'm still unlikely to undertake improvements.

It makes me somewhat more likely to go ahead with improvements in the next 12 months.

It makes me very likely to go ahead with improvements this year.

Q19 - If there were a program that offered 5-year loans with a 2% interest rate for energy-related improvements and retrofit projects ranging from $20,000 to

$5 million, how would this impact your plans for facility improvement? (n=200)

37%

Survey research generally finds that participation propensity tends to be overstated by respondents. For this reason, it is recommended that an adjustment be used to provide a more realistic market estimate. An adjustment using half of those who indicate that they are very likely and one fourth of those who believe that they are somewhat likely means that participation propensity will be about 12%.

58 58

Over one-fourth of organizations would be more likely to install solar if this program was offered to them.

23%

52%

18%

8%

I don't know and am undecided about solar generation systems.

It does not impact my plans at all. I'm unlikely to install a solar generation system.

It makes me somewhat more likely to install a solar generation system in the next 12 months.

It makes me very likely to install a solar generation system this year.

Q20 - If there were a program that offered 10-year loans with a 5% interest rate for solar generation systems, how would this impact your plans for installing such a

system? (n=200)

26%

Survey research generally finds that participation propensity tends to be overstated by respondents. For this reason, it is recommended that an adjustment be used to provide a more realistic market estimate. An adjustment using half of those who indicate they are very likely and one fourth of those who believe that they are somewhat likely means that participation propensity will be about 9%.

59

Sector Profiles

60 60

Industry Sector Groupings

Due to relatively small sample sizes, sectors have been grouped as follows for these industry profiles:

1. Manufacturing and Distribution (56) - Automotive (6), Chemicals (10), Food (5), Transportation and logistics (15), Wholesale distribution (20)

2. Hospitality and Shopping (40) - Hotels (7), Restaurants (3), Retail (30)

3. Business Services (44) - Real estate (8), Business Services*(26), Technology^(10)

4. Healthcare (30)

5. Education (30)

61 61

Manufacturing and Distribution (n=56) Facilities: Locations: 55% have one location; 34% have two to four locations

Age of facility: 59% are in a facility 20+ years old

Size of facility: medium to larger facilities (39% 10-50k sq. ft., 41% 50k+ sq. ft)

Ownership: 79% own the facility

Region: 45% in East TN, 30% in Middle TN, and 25% in West TN

Employees: Tend to be larger employers with 59% having more than 50 employees

Energy attitudes: 80% consider energy important and 70% consider their facility efficient

Key challenges/barriers: Lack of time/too busy/other priorities (41%), lack of budget/funds (36%)

Top energy-related priorities:

Interior lighting (57%), exterior lighting (38%), and energy/PC power management (34%)

Top motivator/driver: Save money (39%), spend less on energy/more on other priorities (30%)

Improvements: Already completed: 86% lighting, 54% mechanical/HVAC

Need to complete: 29% energy management, 27% reflective/cool roof

Plan to complete: 13% renewable energy, 11% insulation

Participation propensity: 43% likely to make facility improvements if loan program available;

29% likely to install solar if loan program available

62 62

Hospitality and Shopping (n=40) Facilities: Locations: 63% have one location; 23% have two to four locations


Size of facility: smaller facilities (68% <50k sq. ft)



Employees: Tend to be smaller employers with 73% having less than 50 employees


Key challenges/barriers: Lack of budget/funds (48%), lack of time/too busy/other priorities (38%),


Interior lighting (63%), exterior lighting (40%), and energy/PC power management (40%)

Top motivator/driver: Spend less on energy/more on other priorities (43%), save money (33%)


Need to complete: 38% energy management, 33% insulation

Plan to complete: 13% insulation, 8% HVAC, 8% lighting



63 63

Business Services (n=44) Facilities: Locations: 66% have one location; 25% have two to four locations





Employees: Tend to be smaller employers with 71% having less than 50 employees


Key challenges/barriers: Lack of budget/funds (52%), lack of time/too busy/other priorities (50%)


HVAC (52%), interior lighting (50%), and energy/PC power management (43%)

Top motivator/driver: Spend less on energy/more on other priorities (43%)


Need to complete: 32% insulation, 30% energy management

Plan to complete: 14% insulation, 9% renewable energy



64 64

Healthcare (n=30) Facilities: Locations: 60% have more than one location, with 30% having 10+




Region: 40% in Middle TN, 33% in East TN, and 27% in West TN

Employees: Tend to be larger employers with 57% having 100+ employees


Key challenges/barriers: Lack of budget/funds (57%)


Interior lighting (60%), HVAC (53%), and energy/PC power management (40%)



Need to complete: 37% energy management, 33% renewable energy

Plan to complete: 7% mechanical/HVAC, 7% lighting, and 7% insulation



65 65

Education (n=30) Facilities: Locations: 60% have one location; 23% have two to four locations


Size of facility: medium to larger facilities (43% 10-50k sq. ft and 40% in 50sq. ft+ facility)


Region: 53% in Middle TN, 27% in East TN, and 20% in West TN

Employees: Tend to be midsize to larger employers with 60% having 50+ employees


Key challenges/ barriers: Lack of budget/funds (70%)


IHVAC (70%) interior lighting (47%), exterior lighting (27%), building envelope upgrades (27%)


Improvements: Already completed: 90% lighting, 67% mechanical/HVAC, 60% energy management

Need to complete: 37% renewable energy, 37% reflective/cool roof

Plan to complete: 17% insulation, 13% reflective/cool roof



66

This project is funded under an agreement with the State of Tennessee. This material is based upon work supported by the Department of Energy under Award

Number DE-EE0000160. CFDA 81.041.

67 67

www.TNEnergy.org

tennessee opportunities in energy efficiency market survey 2013

Business

energy priority

facilities energy efficient

energy management

importance of energy

energyrelated improvements

energyrelated priorities

energy consumption important

renewable energy initiatives