telxius ofc 2017 multi-vendor 100g dp-qpsk line side interoperability field trial over 1030km
TRANSCRIPT
Multi-Vendor 100G DP-QPSK Line-Side InteroperabilityField Trial over 1030 km
Los Angeles, March 2017
OFCTh1D. Advances in Coherent Subsystems
Nestor Garrafa(1), Omar Salome(1), Thomas Mueller(2), Oscar Pache Carcelen(2), Gianluca Calabretta(3),Nacho Carretero(3), Gabriele Galimberti(3), Steven Keck(2), Víctor López(4), Dirk van den Borne(2)(1) Telxius, 1111 Brickell Ave, Miami, Florida 33131, USA ([email protected])(2) Juniper Networks, 1133 Innovation Way, Sunnyvale, CA 94089, USA ([email protected])(3) Cisco Systems Inc., Via S. Maria Molgora, 48 C, Vimercate, MB 20871, Italy ([email protected], [email protected])(4) Telefónica Global CTO, Ronda de la Comunicación 2, 28050 Madrid, Spain ([email protected])
2
Telxius networkSAM-1: Fully Owned• RFS: 2001• Subcom• 4 fiber pairs• It has 24000 Km of submarine
network, 4000Km of terrestrial network and 15 landing stations.
• Compensated cable• Design Capacity: 4.8 Tbps per FP
PCCS: Consortium• RFS: 2015• ASN• Up to 8 fiber pairs• 6,000 km• 9 landing stations• Uncompensated Cable• Design Capacity: 10 Tbps per FP
Unisur: Consortium• RFS: 2014 (Recovered Org.1995)• ASN• 2 fiber pairs• 265 Km• 2 landing stations• Compensated Cable• Design Capacity: 1 Tbps per FP
Marea(Open Cable): Consortium• RFS: 1Q2018• Subcom• 8 fiber pairs• 6,605 Km Submarine Fiber• 2 landing stations• Uncompensated Cable• Design Capacity: 20 Tbps per FP
BRUSA(Open Cable): Fully Owned• RFS: 3Q2018• ASN• 8 fiber pairs• 10,143 Km Submarine Fiber• 4 landing stations• Uncompensated Cable• Design Capacity: 15 Tbps per FP
3
2001 2005 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 20170
2000400060008000
100001200014000160001800020000
0 40 80 160 640 320 600 2801200 1000 700
1700 1700
40 80 160 320 960 1280 1880 21603360
43605060
6760
8460
Upgrades
Upgrade
Total Capacity*
Year
Capa
city
(Gbp
s)
SAm-1 1.9 Tbps Final Capacity with 10G Waves
SAm-1 19.2 Tbps Final Capacity with 100 Gbps Waves
SAm-1 7.68 Tbps Final Capaity with 40 Gbps Waves
40G deployments till 2012100G deployments
Direct Detection 10G deployments till 2011
Capacity Evolution
Nortel 10G 2kKm
2006 2007 2008
Nortel 40G 2kKm
Nortel 40G 4kKm Infinera 10G 2kKmXtera 20G 4kKm
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Ciena 40G 9kKmCiena 100G 2kKM
NSN 100G 4kKm Infinera 40G 2/4kkmHuawei 40G 4kKm
Ciena 100G 3kKM
Ciena, Infinera, ASN, Subcom XTERA 100G
2/4/9kKm
Ciena 200G 4kKM
Infinera Flexgrid 2/4kKmJuniper/Cisco 100G 1kK
TESTS
4
Test Scenario
Jacksonville
Juniper MX2020 & Cisco ASR9004
Ciena WDM
1030 km(2 x 515 km)
Juniper MX2020
Boca Raton
5
Hardware
6
Juniper Test 1030 kmBoca Raton – Jacksonville. SD-FEC
7
Interoperability Cisco - JuniperFirst Case: Boca Raton – Jacksonville. HG-FECDistance: 1030 Km. Cisco transmitting, Juniper receiving.
8
First Case: Boca Raton – Jacksonville. HG-FECDistance: 1030 Km. Cisco transmitting, Juniper receiving.
Interoperability Cisco - Juniper
9
Interoperability Cisco - JuniperSecond Case: Boca Raton – Jacksonville. HG-FECDistance: 1030 Km. Juniper transmitting, Cisco receiving.
10
Interoperability Cisco - JuniperSecond Case: Boca Raton – Jacksonville. HG-FECDistance: 1030 Km. Juniper transmitting, Cisco receiving.
11
PBA
PSJ
SLN
ARC
LUR
VAL CUY BAS LTN
SNT
RIO
NAP
JAX
SGO
BOC SJN FLA
SDRBQACTG
A2 RJ RPO
TSP
A2 SP
SIF
BAL
MNC
GUA
JAXP
EBT
CHI
VBEASH BIL
MDN
MTA
Unisur
MAREA
A1 RJ
CON
LIM
SAm-1Terrestrial Network
SPLTelxius NetworkPossible Scenarios
Router’s Line transponders possibility
12
• We demonstrated 100G coherent DWDM multi-vendor line-side interoperability between Juniper MX2020 and Cisco ASR9904 routers over a 1030-km DWDM link in the Telefonica network. The DWDM line cards use 100G CFP2-ACO pluggable coherent DWDM optics and supports the HG-FEC line-side interworking code. A 3.2 dB margin is measured after 1030 km for the multi-vendor line-side interoperability tests, whereas single-vendor measurements using a proprietary SD-FEC code showed a 4.0 dB system margin.
• We are planning to put this solutions in our backhauls.• We will continue looking for the possibility to use this solution in some
submarine links.• We will desire to have this type of solution with our DWDM providers.
Conclusions
