tefko saracevic1 mediation and user modeling “knowledge is of two kinds. we know a subject...
TRANSCRIPT
Tefko Saracevic 1
Mediation anduser modeling
“Knowledge is of two kinds. We know a subject ourselves, or we know where we can find information upon it.”Samuel Johnson (1709-1784)
[email protected]; http://comminfo.rutgers.edu/~tefko/
Central ideasBut what when we do not know where to
find it? And we still seek information? Then we may find somebody who does know –
a searcher who knows how to go about finding it – mediated searching or mediation
User information seeking is fundamental to mediation
User modeling – a key process forsearchers
To do that: art of interviewing
Tefko Saracevic 2
ToC
1. Mediation2. Information seeking3. User modeling 4. Art of interviewing
Tefko Saracevic 3
1. MediationUser – searcher – information retrieval system
Tefko Saracevic 4
Definitions …in an information context
Mediation:A process where an intermediary – a searcher –
acts on behalf of a user who seeks information
Mediator:A person who intervenes in the
information search process of anotherInformal mediators: friends, family …Formal mediators: searchers, teachers …
Thesaurus:arbitration, intercession, conciliation, intervention,
negotiation
Tefko Saracevic 5
Mediation involves
Human – human interaction interaction between user & searcher
Human – computer interaction interaction between a searcher & IR system
Feedback between the two involving the user during the process
Professional mediation involves diagnosing the user’s problem and identifying what interventions would be helpful
Tefko Saracevic 6
Role of mediation as an overreaching process
Mediation involves a number of things user modeling
representation of an information need & specification of user characteristics affecting searching
searching presentation of results to user
Goal: Meeting user expectations Mediation is both a communication & a
related intervention process
Tefko Saracevic 7
In addition – mediation may also involve
Counseling, explainingamong others, helping in evaluating output
Guidance in follow up & finding further information sources
Teaching about searching and sourcesElimination of ambiguity, reducing
vaguenessInfluencing attitude
Tefko Saracevic 8
2. Information seeking
User quest for information - fundamental to everything
Tefko Saracevic 9
Tefko Saracevic 10
Definitions …
Information as we consider it includes objects in the world potentially conveying
information what is transferred from people or objects to a
person’s cognitive system components of internal knowledge in people’s
mind
To seek information people seek to change their state of their knowledge
Information is anything that can change person’s knowledge (Belkin, 1978)
Tefko Saracevic 11
Definitions …
Information seekingProcess in which humans purposefully engage in
order to change their state of knowledge (Marchionini, 1995)
A conscious effort to acquire information in response to a need or gap in your knowledge (Case, 2002)
The process of construction within information seeking involves fitting information in with what one already knows and extending this knowledge to create new perspectives (Kuhlthau, 2004)
Tefko Saracevic 12
Main direction
In information seeking studies (and there were many):
What factors – variables – are involved when people seek information? Translation: What is really going on when we go about
finding information about something? In everyday life we really do not care – we just go on
doing it – but as professionals we have to understand the process in order to deal with it
The question has many sub-questions such as
in relation to what are people seeking information? how is information seeking (as a broader process)
related to information search (as a narrower process)?
Tefko Saracevic 13
In pursuit of main direction
A number of models have been developed enumerating factors & relationships involved
A few theories have been proposed suggesting explanations
Number of studies have connected information seeking to specific aspects of great interest to searching and user modeling: tasks in information seeking information seeking & the search process
Tefko Saracevic 14
Task
Information seeking is not an end in itself It serves a work task
task is a process in relation to which information is needed
Tasks have been categorized from simple to complex (and a number in-between) complex tasks have a number of sub-tasks the more complex a task the complexity of
information needed increasesImplication: user modeling & searching
should be oriented toward tasks
Tefko Saracevic 15
Information seeking & searching
Several studies connected information seeking with the search process posited information seeking as a broader
context (process) for a more specific process of searching
Exemplify factors – variables – involved showing that there is more to searching than
we think usually
Tefko Saracevic 16
E.g. Kuhlthau model of the information search process (ISP)
Originally studying pupils & undergraduates but subsequently looking at other user groups as well, Kuhlthau (1991, 2004) formulated a six-stage information search process (ISP), each stage representing differing needs, behaviors, and cognitive and affective states
Tefko Saracevic 17
Kuhlthau six stages
1. Initiation: user “becomes aware of a lack of knowledge or understanding”
2. Selection: user needs to “identify and select the general topic to be investigated”
3. Exploration: user needs to “investigate information on the general topic in order to extend personal understanding”
4. Formulation: user forms “a focus from the information encountered”
5. Collection: user needs “to gather information related to the focused topic”
6. Presentation: user completes the search and presents findings
Tefko Saracevic 18
Kuhlthau model (cont.)
Each stage – task - in the information search process incorporates three realms:
1. Affective (feelings)2. Cognitive (thoughts)3. Physical (actions)
Implication: these aspects to be considered in user modeling & searching
i.e. there is more to searching than mere searching
Tefko Saracevic 19
The iterative search process – starts & ends with inf. seeking tasks ( copy from Hembrook et al. 2005)
3.User modelingEssential part of mediation
Tefko Saracevic 20
Tefko Saracevic 21
Definition
User modeling is a process of identifying, understanding, and defining user information needs, context, requirements, and preferences, together with factors or attributes in the profile of the user that affect subsequent search for information
Tefko Saracevic 22
Definition …in addition
But user modeling should also deal with identifying user’s conceptions about how the information system or resource works, together with related expectations, with possible explanations on how it really works and what could be really expected
User modeling in searching
User modeling is a qualified dialog & discourse between a searcher & a user seeking information to determine the information needs of a user in order for the searcher to be an effective interface between the user & literature “literature” = recorded knowledge in many forms
Tefko Saracevic 23
Tefko Saracevic 24
in other words
In user modeling you identify not only everything about the information
need and question at hand but also a number of other factors inherent
with the user that may be a guide or even be decisive in selection of resources, search strategy and tactics, evaluation and provision of results
and use the occasion to verify user conceptions and expectations and possibly provide reality explanations – there could be a mismatch
Tefko Saracevic 25
User modeling is user+
Identifying elements about a user that impact interaction, selection of resources searching, types of retrieval …
Three general categories: information requirements (need, context …) user profile: general user characteristics &
attributes user mental model of system/resource &
expectations
Tefko Saracevic 26
Information requirements – ask!
Informational questions a searcher should ask: what is the problem, task at hand that generated
a need for information? what is the context, environment of that?
what information is needed for that problem/task? what is the question?
what will the information be used for? what are any requirements, restrictions on the
type of information needed? what information resources were already utilized?
any history of previous efforts? results?
Tefko Saracevic 27
Information requirements (cont.)
Cognitive, affective state of user: how much does the user know about the topic
of the question at hand? how uncertain is the user? how much wanted, how fast? tolerance for amount, variety of information?
Tefko Saracevic 28
User profile – to establish – affects a lot of selections in searching
Demographic data about the user that may be relevant for search education subject, level
relation to problem/task at hand job, profession, position, if relevant age group, if relevant gender, if relevant language skills, if relevant other factors, as specific to a given
information need & question
Tefko Saracevic 29
User stereotypes
Based on relating other users’ behaviors to the current user’s (e.g. Amazon recommendations)
exhibiting similar needs & information behavior
At times user stereotypes are applied in user modeling common characteristics of a group of users &
their needs e.g. third graders, PhD dissertation students, patent
attorneys a question on black holes by an astronomer
requires search of different resources than a black hole question by a twelve grader
Tefko Saracevic 30
stereotypes (cont.)
Study and application of user stereotypes is used in computer science & other fields to design & adapt components of an information
system to user requirements e.g. interface design recommender systems apply in machine learning
Looking for characteristics that may be applied in personalization of automated processes
p.s. term "stereotype” is a bit loaded, thus other related terms are being used as well e.g. recommender
Tefko Saracevic 31
User mental model of system, resource
Conceptions that user has about the system, resource, mediator … at hand for the submitted need what does the user think the system can
accomplish? what are the expectations?
Used to compare, match with reality of system possibilities and expectations may affect user changing other aspects
© Tefko Saracevic 32
On user modeling
Searching is always done in a context of information seeking by a user (or a group of users) – the user certainly treats it that way understanding user’s information seeking is
necessary to place the role & define the conduct of a given search – central to user modeling
Information seeking has many dimensions User modeling is your effort to understand
and effectively apply relevant dimensions in a search
Tefko Saracevic 33
these are not graphic models of user modeling, (unless???) but they are fun …
4. InterviewingHow to? Categories of questions
Tefko Saracevic 34
Related to reference interview
Long standing concern in librarianship A basic & major professional skill of
reference librariansLiterature on the topic quite large
but mostly prescriptive, some theories from communication
Tefko Saracevic 35
Interviewing users
Broader context: Interview and interviewing as treated in a number of fields theories from communication
interpersonal, social interaction
theories and practices from sociology - among main methods
theories and practices from journalism ethical concerns
Tefko Saracevic 36
Characteristic of user interview
Purposive by both participants user has goal, searcher has goal
Restricted to given subject(s)Relies on questions - answers for
diagnosisSituation bound; social encounterPossible counseling aspectsConnected to informational outcome
level, quantity, type ...User evaluates encounter, outcomes
Tefko Saracevic 37
Variables
Same characteristics at hand as in all interviews A number of variables involved in interviews
meaning that there are many elements that are capable of changing & varying
and that they affect outcome
These are the elements that the searcher has to consider “worry about” & deal with to positively affect the
outcome
Interviews may be subject to communication accidents & failures – watch out!
Tefko Saracevic 38
Tefko Saracevic 39
Variables to consider
User Problem, task Inf. need Subject knowledge Intent Demographics
Searcher Communication skills Knowledge
subject inf. resources
Affective Intent
IR systems; library• Inf. resources• Situation, access• Policies, rules, $$$$
Results – outcomes• Effectiveness, validity, reliability
What is user’s information need? - Diagnosis
Taylor’s classification of information needs: Visceral - unexpressed
user has a need but it is vague Conscious - within mind
user has a relatively well formulated need in mind Formalized – statement
user has expressed the need in a statement, question, example
Compromised - as presenteduser has presented a need to a system – query
Searcher has to analyze them
Tefko Saracevic 40
Types of questions asked in an interview:
Closed questions “Do you want articles in English only?”‘yes - no’; ‘this-that’ answers
Open questions‘tell me more about project ...”elicits descriptive answers & encourages user to talk
Neutral questionsgetting the background situation (how the
information need was generated), the gap or missing piece of understanding, and the uses, or how the user plans to use this information
Tefko Saracevic 41
Role of questions - answers
Clarify, expand, and perhaps repair the need or question as it is initially presented by the user
Provide basic information for user modelingPrepare for selection of files or resourcesEstablish user priorities & evaluation
criteriaPrepare for translation of need, question
into an appropriate query or queriesDo a good job
Tefko Saracevic 42
Art of interviewing – purposive social interaction
Situational factors setting, physical environment rules, regulations, ethics appearance, demeanor
Communication skills semantics; language expression, delivery nonverbal communication turn taking encouragement; backchannels
Social factors establishing confidence rapport
Tefko Saracevic 43
Art of interviewing (cont.)
Strategies opening moves
setting an agenda, stage progression in stages exploration, guidance maintaining focus. re-focusing feedback, re-iteration closure
Content, questions from categories in next slides role of explanation of choices
Tefko Saracevic 44
What are they talking about at interview & during/after searching?
Context
Terminology
System explanations
Search tactics
Tefko Saracevic 45
User problem, taskRequest, inf. needExpectations
Concepts & termsBoundariesRestrictions
How, what, when ..Features, files, resources
Selection, variation terms, logic, files
Mistake correction
Talking about … (cont.)
Tefko Saracevic 46
Review & relevance
Actions
Backchannels
Social/ extraneous
Review, evaluation tactics, terms, sources ...
Relevance judging; feedback
Description of activitiesExplanations
Communication prompts, fillers, acknowledging ..
Social discourseFormalities
Counseling, enabling
Users often do not have well defined problem well expressed or specific question ideas what inf. or resources exist or may be useful what to do next, as to information or sources
Counseling: help in definition, focusing advice on action
Enabling: instruction on use, technology, structure of resources ...
Tefko Saracevic 47
Conclusions
Mediation: a complex process Requires varied knowledge & skills of
intermediaries: communication, interviewing diagnosis, counseling information resources, their validity & capabilities systems, networks
Intermediaries – searchers - role changing But: GREAT FUN & SATISFACTION
Tefko Saracevic 48
© Tefko Saracevic 49
thank youM. C. Escher
can you figure out people walking up & down the steps?
Tefko Saracevic 50
you can find more on the site of M.C. Escher Foundation & in many lectures on geometry, psychology, illusions. As far as I know, this is the first time they are used in a lecture on user modeling. Why not?