Teaming for Success:Going from ALL to EACH

Option #2: Oregon Reading First’s PD series• Training series is optional, if interested submit

application– Application due by November 22nd

• Content:– Systems-level problem solving– Systems level and individual growth and goal setting– RTI in a Three-tiered model (Tigard-Tualatin Series)– District and School Literacy planning (Sustainability)

• PD mechanism– Statewide, Regional, school-based

• Funding:– February, 2007 ODE will fund– 2007-2008 school year either RF funding or

alternative ODE funds

Objectives

Part 1

• New section 3 reports

• Developing school goals K-3

• Student goals and zones of growthPart 2

• Systems level problem solvingPart 3

• Sustainability

• Literacy planning

Healthy Systems (Tiers) Matter

School A

Student weekly growth: .5 cwpm

Instructional Group Average weekly growth: .5 cwpm

School B

Student weekly growth: .5 cwpm

Instructional Group Average weekly growth:

1.75 cwpm

Dual Discrepancy: Severely discrepant in initial skill level and growth

Section 3 Reports and School Level Goals

Oregon Reading First Section 3 Report

Oregon Reading First Section 3 Report - Charts

Oregon Reading First Section 3 Report - Text

Kindergarten Studentsacross 12 states in Western Region

*High performing = 85th percentile

% Intensive K

Students Entering

Fall

High Performing*

% of Students

Benchmark at EOY

Average

% of Students

Benchmark at EOY

60% or more 95.9% 83.4%

50 – 59% 93.8% 74.5%

40 – 49% 95.7% 79.7%

30 – 39% 93.9% 78.8%

20 – 29% 93.8% 77.4%

0 – 19% 100% 84.2%

Grade 1 Studentsacross 12 states in Western Region

*High performing = 85 th percentile

% Intensive K

Students Entering

Fall

High Performing

% of Students

Benchmark at EOY

Average

% of Students Benchmark at EOY

60% or more 71.4% 57.9%

50 – 59% 77.8% 53.6%

40 – 49% 73.7% 59.2%

30 – 39% 80.3% 63.2%

20 – 29% 81% 64.1%

0 – 19% 89.7% 70.7%

Grade 2 Studentsacross 12 states in Western Region

*High performing = 85th percentile

% Intensive K

Students Entering

Fall

High Performing

% of Students

Benchmark at EOY

Average

% of Students

Benchmark at EOY

60% or more 63.2% 48%

50 – 59% 63.8% 45%

40 – 49% 71.1% 52.8%

30 – 39% 66.2% 51.3%

20 – 29% 68.6% 54.8%

0 – 19% 87.7% 65.1%

Grade 3 Studentsacross 12 states in Western Region

*High performing = 85th percentile

% Intensive K

Students Entering

Fall

High Performing

% of Students

Benchmark at EOY

Average

% of Students

Benchmark at EOY

60% or more 63.3% 47.6%

50 – 59% 64.1% 45.9%

40 – 49% 63.9% 50%

30 – 39% 62.5% 44.9%

20 – 29% 71% 51.8%

0 – 19% 75% 58.3%

Zones of Growth: Weekly Growth Rates 1. Optimal weekly growth rates = 2.1 cwpm 2. Acceptable weekly growth rates = 1.75 - 2.0 cwpm 3. Grey Zone weekly growth rates = 1 - 1.74 cwpm 4. Unacceptable weekly growth rates = < 1.0 cwpm

Zones of Growth for students that begin the year at High Intensive students

Short Term Goals : Henry is currently reading 22 cwpm. Within 10 weeks Henry will be reading 43 cwpm. This is based on Optimal weekly growth rates of 2.1 growth per week. During the next 10 weeks Henry’s instructional modifications will include...