team introduction
DESCRIPTION
Team Introduction. construction manager Kit Fleming. architect Xiang Liu. engineer Peng Li. owner Hans Verheij. Collaboration in Cyberspace. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Team Introduction](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062422/568135f2550346895d9d625b/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
![Page 2: Team Introduction](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062422/568135f2550346895d9d625b/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
construction manager Kit Fleming
engineer Peng Li
architect Xiang Liu
owner Hans Verheij
Collaboration in Cyberspace
E X P R E S S T E A M 2 0 0 2 . C E E 2 2 2 . A E C G L O B A L T E A M C L A S S 2 0 0 2
Team Introduction
![Page 3: Team Introduction](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062422/568135f2550346895d9d625b/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
• Multi-disciplinary, collaborative teamwork in a building project
• Apply discipline knowledge and technologies.
• Knowledge management.
• The year is 2015
• A 3-story building
• Total fund, $5,500,000
• Maintain the footprint of the existing buildings
• A collection of rare cactus varieties about 16,000 square feet is protected by the “Society Environmental Desert Studies.”
Requirements
Project Goal
![Page 4: Team Introduction](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062422/568135f2550346895d9d625b/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
The campus map of Express University
The site map of new engineering school
Location
Express University is located in Phoenix, Arizona.
Climate/Weather
Annual average temperature is 61F.
Annual rainfall is 7.6 inch
Site Map
![Page 5: Team Introduction](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062422/568135f2550346895d9d625b/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
The site map of new engineering school
• Good use of materials
• Insulation Concerns
• Aesthetic taste to enrich environment
Analysis of Context
![Page 6: Team Introduction](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062422/568135f2550346895d9d625b/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
The site map of new engineering school
• Cactus, a typical plant in a desert environment
• A collection of rare cactus varieties between two footprints
• Other green plants on campus
Analysis of Landscape
![Page 7: Team Introduction](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062422/568135f2550346895d9d625b/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
A collection of cactus
Outside public space
Entrance to each footprint
Subdivided roads
Main roads
Analysis of Circulation
![Page 8: Team Introduction](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062422/568135f2550346895d9d625b/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
static dynamic
Design Concept
![Page 9: Team Introduction](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062422/568135f2550346895d9d625b/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
• static status
• regular geometric forms
• solid exterior look
• symmetrical layout
conversation
The silent conversation between desert and architecture
static
Design I Concept
![Page 10: Team Introduction](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062422/568135f2550346895d9d625b/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
The relationship of three layers of lines along X, Y, Z axis 21 3
2
Vertical circulation of the building
The first layer of lines is along the footprint.
The second layer of lines reveals the horizontal lines along X, Y axis.
The third layer of lines displays the relationship between horizontal and vertical lines.
1
3
Design I Analysis
![Page 11: Team Introduction](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062422/568135f2550346895d9d625b/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Auditorium, technical supportSmall classroomInstructional lab
MEP
The First Floor Plan
-7’-1’ 0’
14’
27’
40’
58’
116’
58’
Design I Drawings & Models
![Page 12: Team Introduction](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062422/568135f2550346895d9d625b/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Student office
SeminarBig classroomStorage
Computer machine roomSmall classroom
The Second Floor Plan
Winterthur Museum of Art Extension
West Elevation
Design I Drawings
N
![Page 13: Team Introduction](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062422/568135f2550346895d9d625b/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Faculty officeFaculty loungeMEPChair’s office Secretaries Senior admin. office
The Third Floor Plan
0’
14’
27’
40’
Design I Drawings & Details
![Page 14: Team Introduction](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062422/568135f2550346895d9d625b/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
• Climate
39 °FLow temperature in Jan
105 °FHigh temperature in July
0.1”Annual snow fall
7.6”Average rain
61°FAverage temperature
• Soil conditions
Bearing capacity: 5ksf
No expansive soil
• Earthquake free
Site Issues
Earthquake Locations
![Page 15: Team Introduction](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062422/568135f2550346895d9d625b/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Gravity Loads
![Page 16: Team Introduction](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062422/568135f2550346895d9d625b/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Gravity load path——Steel Braced frames
Gravity load path——Two way slabs
Gravity Loads
![Page 17: Team Introduction](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062422/568135f2550346895d9d625b/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Lateral Loads
Wind Zone Map
![Page 18: Team Introduction](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062422/568135f2550346895d9d625b/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Lateral load path —— Concrete MRF
Lateral Loads
Lateral load path —— Braced frames
![Page 19: Team Introduction](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062422/568135f2550346895d9d625b/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
“Simplicity and functionality through early collaboration and exchange of ideas, inspirations and constraints.”
• Simple
• Regular
• Least intrusive structural system
• Constructability
• Lower budget
Design Goals
![Page 20: Team Introduction](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062422/568135f2550346895d9d625b/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Option 1 -- Framing
Framing Plan
Laterally Braced Frame
• 2VLI20 composite deck with 2.5” light weight concrete slab
• Beam & Girder: full composite with slab
• 6”x6” HSS shape braces
• Column size: W14x68
• 10” concrete walls
![Page 21: Team Introduction](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062422/568135f2550346895d9d625b/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Structural Options
• Composite floor system
• Laterally braced frame
• Cast-in-place concrete walls in elevator shaft
• Spread footings
Option 1: Option 2:• Concrete frame
• One-way slab
• Waffle slab in auditorium
![Page 22: Team Introduction](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062422/568135f2550346895d9d625b/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Option 1
entrance
main entrance
First floor
Second floor
Third floor
Matching The Architectural Plan
![Page 23: Team Introduction](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062422/568135f2550346895d9d625b/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Option 1 -- Sizes
Typical Sizes:
2VLI20, 2.5”
W18x119
W16x40
W21x48
W21x48
10” wall
![Page 24: Team Introduction](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062422/568135f2550346895d9d625b/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Option 1 -- Foundation
Foundation Plan
Foundation Plan:
• Shallow foundation
• Spread footing under columns, with size of 8’x8’
• Strip footing under concrete walls, with a width of 4’
![Page 25: Team Introduction](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062422/568135f2550346895d9d625b/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Option 1 -- Connection
Typical connections
Beam-Girder
Girder-Column webGirder-Column flange
Beam Splice
![Page 26: Team Introduction](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062422/568135f2550346895d9d625b/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Option 2 -- Framing
1st Floor Framing Plan 2nd and 3rd Floor Framing Plan
Framing Plan——Concrete Frame:
![Page 27: Team Introduction](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062422/568135f2550346895d9d625b/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Option 2 -- SizesTypical Element Sizes:
•One way slab
Depth: 7”
Steel: #3@6”
3@3=9"2.5" 2.5"2.5"
2.5"
16.5"#3@10"
Beam Column section
2@4=8"3"
3"
3"
12"#3@14"
3"
Beam Section Column Section
•Beams
14” x 21.5”
6#7 bars
#3@10” Ties
•Columns
18” x 18”
6#7 bars
#3@14” Ties
![Page 28: Team Introduction](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062422/568135f2550346895d9d625b/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Option 2 -- Waffle Slab
Waffle Slab:
Waffle slab
•4.5” slab
•Total depth: 22.5”
•30”x30” voids
•6” ribs
Top View
![Page 29: Team Introduction](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062422/568135f2550346895d9d625b/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Option 2 -- Foundation
A A
Raft Footing
A - A
![Page 30: Team Introduction](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062422/568135f2550346895d9d625b/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Pros and Cons
Options Pros Cons
Steel Braced FrameSpread Footing
•Regular framing plan•Simple connection•Easy construction•Inexpensive•Simple foundation
• Large and heavy beams in auditorium
• Exterior brace conflicts with architect’s vision
• Possible differential settlement
Concrete FrameRaft Footing
• Pre-cast• No differential
settlement• More redundant in
LFR system
• More form work on waffle slab
• Thick footing and more reinforcement
• More expensive
![Page 31: Team Introduction](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062422/568135f2550346895d9d625b/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Layout1
Design I Static
Material Lay down
Cactus
Crane
Wash Out/Pump Area
Material Lay Down
Parking
Trailers
![Page 32: Team Introduction](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062422/568135f2550346895d9d625b/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Design I Concept
Alternative 1- Steel Brace Frame
Alternative 2- MRF Pre-Cast
Waffle Slab
Design I Static
Cost Analysis
$3,672,990 Total
$122/SF
$4,126,376 Total
$137/SF
![Page 33: Team Introduction](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062422/568135f2550346895d9d625b/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Alternative 2- MRF Pre-Cast
Waffle SlabAlternative 1- Steel Brace
Frame
Design I StaticCost
Breakdown
$24,087 $255,264
$923,099
$580,683
$232,753
$549,857
$82,345
$713,715
$22,869$217,788
$445,503
$547,950
$278,553
$532,027
$81,570
$690,045
![Page 34: Team Introduction](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062422/568135f2550346895d9d625b/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Design I Static
Alt 1- Steel
Start- 9/2/14
Occupancy- 7/11/16
Alt 2-MRF Pre-Cast
Occupancy June 3th ‘16
Occupancy July 11th ‘16
Foundation Complete 10/11/15
3rd Floor Steel Complete
11/5/16
Building Enclosed 1/14/16
Foundation Complete 10/16/15
Waffle Slab Complete 11/9/15
Building Enclosed 1/29/16
Schedule Comparison
![Page 35: Team Introduction](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062422/568135f2550346895d9d625b/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Design I ConceptDesign I Static
Alternative 1- Steel Brace Frame
Alternative 2- MRF Pre Waffle Slab
Pros and Cons
•Fast Construction
•Cheap
•Simple Layout
Pro:
Con:•Site Access
•Heavy Beams in Auditorium
Pro:
Con:•Waffle Slab
•Expensive
•Uniform Members
•Speed of Erection
![Page 36: Team Introduction](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062422/568135f2550346895d9d625b/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
conversation
The echo of conversation between desert and architecture
dynamic
• Dynamic status
• Façade
• Colors
• Angled partition walls
• Irregular circulation
Design II Concept
![Page 37: Team Introduction](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062422/568135f2550346895d9d625b/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
21 3
Vertical circulation of the building
The first dynamic element is the form.
The second dynamic element is partition angled walls.
The third dynamic element is the color.
Three dynamic elements
2
1
3
Design II Analysis
![Page 38: Team Introduction](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062422/568135f2550346895d9d625b/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
why architects love colors ?
Chapel of St. Ignatius by Steven HollBerlin IBA housing by Zaha Hadid
Kamioka Town Hall by Arata Isozaki
Shukosha Building by Arata Isozaki
Sports Center Davos by Annette Gigon + Mike Guyer
Colors represent nature
Colors light the space
Colors may function as landmark
Colors have symbolic meaning
Colors lift spirit
Design II Color Coding
![Page 39: Team Introduction](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062422/568135f2550346895d9d625b/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
Auditorium, technical supportSeminar
Instructional lab
MEP
The First Floor Plan
Small classroom
West Elevation
38’ 76’
114’
Design II Drawings & Models
N
![Page 40: Team Introduction](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062422/568135f2550346895d9d625b/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
Big classroomStudent officeComputer machine room
The Second Floor Plan
SeminarMEPSmall classroom
0’
14’
27’
43’
-4’ -1’
Design II Drawings & Models
![Page 41: Team Introduction](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062422/568135f2550346895d9d625b/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
Faculty office
Chair’s office, Secretary, Senior admin. office
Faculty lounge
The Third Floor Plan
MEPSmall courtyard
0’
14’
27’
40’
-6’ -1’
Hamburg Music School A House by Morphosis
Design II Drawings & Details
![Page 42: Team Introduction](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062422/568135f2550346895d9d625b/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
Angled walls and colors imply movement
Sequential spatial layout
Design II Movement
![Page 43: Team Introduction](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062422/568135f2550346895d9d625b/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
Structural Options
• Composite floor system
• Steel MRF
• Concrete walls in elevator shaft
• Strip footings
Option 1: Option 2:• Cast-In-Place Concrete frame
• Flat slab
• Strip footing along exterior columns
![Page 44: Team Introduction](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062422/568135f2550346895d9d625b/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
Option 1 -- Framing
Moment Resistant Frame
W14x26
W16x50
W18x50
2VLI20, 2.5”
W14x68 column
![Page 45: Team Introduction](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062422/568135f2550346895d9d625b/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
Option 1
First floor
Second floor
Third floor
Matching The Architectural Plan
![Page 46: Team Introduction](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062422/568135f2550346895d9d625b/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
Option 1 -- Foundation
Foundation Plan
Foundation Plan:
• Shallow foundation
• Spread footing under interior columns, 8’x8’
• Strip footing under external columns, with a width of 4’
![Page 47: Team Introduction](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062422/568135f2550346895d9d625b/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
Option 2 -- Framing
Framing Plan
12”x18” beam
8” two way slab
10” concrete wall
14”x14” column
![Page 48: Team Introduction](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062422/568135f2550346895d9d625b/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
Option 2 -- Two-way slab
Slab
Column
Shear reinforcing
Flat slab with drop panel
Typical span: 25’x25’
![Page 49: Team Introduction](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062422/568135f2550346895d9d625b/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
Pros and Cons
Options Pros Cons
Steel MRF
• Prefabrication possible
• Inexpensive• Simple foundation, no
much excavation work
• Complex moment resistant connection
• Less space for MEP
Concrete Frame
• Large clear space for MEP system
• Less concrete and reinforcing
• Simple foundation
• Cast-In-Place concrete
• More form work
![Page 50: Team Introduction](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062422/568135f2550346895d9d625b/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
Layout 2
Cactus
Trailers
Crane
Material Lay Down
Material Lay down
Parking
Wash Out/Pump Area
Parking
Design II Dynamic
![Page 51: Team Introduction](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062422/568135f2550346895d9d625b/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
Alternative 1- MRF Steel Alternative 2- Flat Slabs
Cost Analysis
$3,715,073 Total
$125/SF
$3,846,427 Total
$129/SF
Design II Dynamic
![Page 52: Team Introduction](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062422/568135f2550346895d9d625b/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
Alternative 1- MRF Steel Alternative 2- Flat Slabs
Design II Dynamic
$23,936 $229,392
$628,224
$622,325
$284,511
$590,195
$85,345
$713,175
$23,817$228,901
$487,601
$628,205
$283,956
$581,075
$85,345
$709,609
Cost Breakdown
![Page 53: Team Introduction](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062422/568135f2550346895d9d625b/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
Schedule Comparison
Alt 1- MRF Steel
Alt 2-Flat Slabs
Start- 9/2/14
End- 7/29/15
Occupancy June 15th ‘15
Foundation Complete 10/16/14
3rd Floor Steel Complete 11/17/15
Building Enclosed
2/2/15
Structural System
Complete 12/15/14
Building Enclosed 2/19/15
Foundation Complete 10/17/14 Occupancy July29th ‘15
Design II DynamicSchedule
Comparison
![Page 54: Team Introduction](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062422/568135f2550346895d9d625b/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
Design I Concept
Pros and Cons
•Fast Construction
•Simple Foundation
Pro:
Con:•Difficult Connections
•More Expensive
Pro:
Con:•Longer Schedule
•Less Pre-Fabrication
•No Beams
•Site Access
Design II Dynamic
Alternative 1- MRF Steel Alternative 2- Flat Slabs
![Page 55: Team Introduction](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062422/568135f2550346895d9d625b/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
Decision Matrix
CONCEPT 1
+ PROS - CONS
A
E
C
• Regular framing
• Simple connection
• Large and heavy beams
• Unsymmetric
• Easy accessibility
• Big public open space
• Interesting details
• Unexciting interior space
• Less active in existing environment
• Simple connection/framing
• Cheap, Fast Schedule
• Waffle Slab, Expensive
• Site Access
![Page 56: Team Introduction](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062422/568135f2550346895d9d625b/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
Decision Matrix
CONCEPT 2
+ PROS - CONS
A
E
C
• Larger space for MEP
• Symmetric
• Irregular overhanging
• More form work
• More difficult connection
• Playing active role
• Concerning movements
• Interesting interior space
• No big open space
• Potential conflict to MEP system
• Site Access
• Smaller Beam Sizes
• More Expensive, Longer Construction
• Irregular 3rd Floor
![Page 57: Team Introduction](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062422/568135f2550346895d9d625b/html5/thumbnails/57.jpg)
Valuable Lessons
• Do not wait until last minutes!!!
• Team iteration is critical to achieve a better structural design.
• Be prepared before discussion.
![Page 58: Team Introduction](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062422/568135f2550346895d9d625b/html5/thumbnails/58.jpg)
Improvements
• More contact with owner and mentors.
• Faster and more frequent iteration.
• Learn more about other disciplines.
• Early sharing of information, even if incomplete
![Page 59: Team Introduction](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062422/568135f2550346895d9d625b/html5/thumbnails/59.jpg)
Thanks
Thanks to Mentors and Owner
Special thanks to all AEC classmates