TEACHER EVALUATION Presentation Before New Teaching Faculty

TEACHER EVALUATION Presentation Before New Teaching Faculty

February 6, 2013 New Teacher PD at Dearborn High

BY GLENN MALEYKO, Ph.DDirector of Human

Resources

February 6, 2013 New Teacher PD at Dearborn High

BY GLENN MALEYKO, Ph.DDirector of Human

ResourcesA few of the slides are based on a presentation by Jim Gullen Oakland Schools at the MIEM conference in Lansing on February 29th, 2012. The video protocol is based on work by Wendy Zdeb-Roper MASSP.Wendy Zdeb-Roper MASSP. Some of the Slides are also based on the Danielson iobservation training (Pam Rosa) from WCRESA on April 3rd and 4th.

Legislation RequiresLegislation Requires Rigorous, transparent, and fair performance evaluation systems

Evaluations based on multiple rating categories

Evaluation based in part on student growth: as determined by multiple measures of student learning including national, state or local assessments or other objective criteria as a significant factor.

Rigorous, transparent, and fair performance evaluation systems

Evaluations based on multiple rating categories

Evaluation based in part on student growth: as determined by multiple measures of student learning including national, state or local assessments or other objective criteria as a significant factor.

Evaluation ComponentsStudent Outcomes

Evaluation ComponentsStudent Outcomes

2. The measurement of student outcomes based on a definition of desired student outcomes that is clear commonly accepted, and supported by transparent measurement methods and instruments that are technically sound and validated against desired outcomes.

2. The measurement of student outcomes based on a definition of desired student outcomes that is clear commonly accepted, and supported by transparent measurement methods and instruments that are technically sound and validated against desired outcomes.

Observation Protocol has been the predominant

focus, however that will shift soon

Observation Protocol has been the predominant

focus, however that will shift soon

Evaluation Focus Shift: What does this mean?

Evaluation Focus Shift: What does this mean?

0%10%20%30%

40%50%60%70%

80%

2013-14

2014-15

2015-16

Observation

Growth Data

Winston ChurchillWinston Churchill

True genius resides in the capacity for evaluation of uncertain, hazardous, and conflicting information.

True genius resides in the capacity for evaluation of uncertain, hazardous, and conflicting information.

Evaluation ComponentsObservation ProtocolEvaluation ComponentsObservation Protocol

1. The measurement of practice (what an educator does) based on a definition of practice that is clear, observable, commonly accepted, and supported by transparent measurement methods and instruments that are technically sound and validated against desired outcomes.

1. The measurement of practice (what an educator does) based on a definition of practice that is clear, observable, commonly accepted, and supported by transparent measurement methods and instruments that are technically sound and validated against desired outcomes.

Proposed Legislation in Lansing

Proposed Legislation in Lansing

House Bill 5223 (MCL 380.1249 & 380.1531j) would revise current evaluation

requirements for teachers, and require that school districts meet new requirements for

school administrator evaluations, as described in detail in House Bill 5224. The revisions

follow.

House Bill 5223 (MCL 380.1249 & 380.1531j) would revise current evaluation

requirements for teachers, and require that school districts meet new requirements for

school administrator evaluations, as described in detail in House Bill 5224. The revisions

follow.

House Bill 5223 specifies instead that the percentage remain at 25 percent during the next

three academic years: 2014-2015; 2015-2016; and 2016-2017. Then, beginning in the

2017-2018 school year, the student growth component would be raised to 50 percent.

House Bill 5223 specifies instead that the percentage remain at 25 percent during the next

three academic years: 2014-2015; 2015-2016; and 2016-2017. Then, beginning in the

2017-2018 school year, the student growth component would be raised to 50 percent.

Growth-Achievement Measurement OptionsGrowth-Achievement Measurement Options

1. State Tests (MEAP/MME/MiAccess)

2. Other third party assessments (Tera Nova, Iowa, etc)

3. Locally Created Assessments-common assessments ?- unique assessments (SRI, DRA, Writing prompts,

other).

1. State Tests (MEAP/MME/MiAccess)

2. Other third party assessments (Tera Nova, Iowa, etc)

3. Locally Created Assessments-common assessments ?- unique assessments (SRI, DRA, Writing prompts,

other).

Growth- Achievement Measures continued. Growth- Achievement Measures continued.

4. Measures other than Tests Portfolios, presentations, projects, product assessments.

5. Some combination of the above- The legislation calls for multiple measures.

Each measure comes with strengths and weaknesses.

4. Measures other than Tests Portfolios, presentations, projects, product assessments.

5. Some combination of the above- The legislation calls for multiple measures.

Each measure comes with strengths and weaknesses.

Weighted FormulaWeighted Formula 75% will be based on Observation Protocol and the 5 Standards for Effective Teaching.

  This includes observations (formal and not formal), walkthroughs, other performance measures that are related to the teacher evaluation rubric which includes all 5 standards. Professional Responsibilities are included as one of the standards.

75% will be based on Observation Protocol and the 5 Standards for Effective Teaching.

  This includes observations (formal and not formal), walkthroughs, other performance measures that are related to the teacher evaluation rubric which includes all 5 standards. Professional Responsibilities are included as one of the standards.

25% Growth Data25% Growth Data

5% District growth based on state accountability measures

10% Building Growth based on state or building or district common assessments

10% Classroom Growth based on State Assessments,

5% District growth based on state accountability measures

10% Building Growth based on state or building or district common assessments

10% Classroom Growth based on State Assessments,

10% Building Growth Data10% Building Growth Data Elementary -SRI, DRA & DRA task analysis, Star Math, 6 plus 1 traits, Building/District Common Assessments, NWEA, MEAP, Art, Music and & PE common Assessments.  

Middle School -SRI, DRA, Star Math, 6 plus 1 traits, Building/District Common Assessments, NWEA, MEAP, Art, Music and & PE common Assessments, and Explore.

High School- Explore, Plan, MME, MEAP, SRI, Star Math, Common Assessments, AP exams, and Departmental Assessments.

Elementary -SRI, DRA & DRA task analysis, Star Math, 6 plus 1 traits, Building/District Common Assessments, NWEA, MEAP, Art, Music and & PE common Assessments.  

Middle School -SRI, DRA, Star Math, 6 plus 1 traits, Building/District Common Assessments, NWEA, MEAP, Art, Music and & PE common Assessments, and Explore.

High School- Explore, Plan, MME, MEAP, SRI, Star Math, Common Assessments, AP exams, and Departmental Assessments.

10% Classroom Growth Data

10% Classroom Growth Data

10% Classroom Growth based on State Assessments, District Common Assessments or Classroom Assessments  (ex. Performance or product measures or other formative assessments, pre and post tests are required).

10% Classroom Growth based on State Assessments, District Common Assessments or Classroom Assessments  (ex. Performance or product measures or other formative assessments, pre and post tests are required).

TeachscapeTeachscape

We have 59 Administrators that have passed the assessment. 14 started in a new cohort this year.

We have 59 Administrators that have passed the assessment. 14 started in a new cohort this year.

Governor’s Council will ( Now Michigan Council

on Educator Effectiveness

Governor’s Council will ( Now Michigan Council

on Educator Effectiveness

Make specific recommendations to the Governor and Legislature regarding this by April 30, 2012

They Shall submit a growth and assessment tool (MCL) 380.1249(5)(a)

Make specific recommendations to the Governor and Legislature regarding this by April 30, 2012

They Shall submit a growth and assessment tool (MCL) 380.1249(5)(a)

They Shall submit a growth and assessment tool (MCL) 380.1249(5)

(a)

They Shall submit a growth and assessment tool (MCL) 380.1249(5)

(a) That is value-added (MCL) 380.1249(5)(a) (I)

Has at least a pre and post test (MCL) 380.1249(5)(a) (IV)

It must be based on 3 years of data if the data is available. (MCL) 380.1249(2)(a) (II)

That is value-added (MCL) 380.1249(5)(a) (I)

Has at least a pre and post test (MCL) 380.1249(5)(a) (IV)

It must be based on 3 years of data if the data is available. (MCL) 380.1249(2)(a) (II)

A Quote from Maya Angelou

A Quote from Maya Angelou

“People will forget what you said. People will forget what you did.

But they will never forget how you made them feel”

Commencement Address, 2002

“People will forget what you said. People will forget what you did.

But they will never forget how you made them feel”

Commencement Address, 2002

Maria MontessoriMaria Montessori

One test of the correctness of educational procedure is the happiness of the child.

One test of the correctness of educational procedure is the happiness of the child.

Legislative ChangesLegislative Changes

- IDP goals developed for all 1st year probationary teachers or any teacher rated minimally effective or ineffective on most recent evaluation

- IDP goals developed for all 1st year probationary teachers or any teacher rated minimally effective or ineffective on most recent evaluation

Plan I: Plan I:

  --IDP-- page 11 -to be completed by September 30th)

2.  Post -Observation Conference Form -- page 14 and page 15 (multiple submissions, minimum of two to be competed by the end of the year. These should be spread-out during the year. )

3. Year End Evaluation Form -- page 16 and page 17  (to be completed by April 30th)

Please note that all timelines are recommended

  --IDP-- page 11 -to be completed by September 30th)

2.  Post -Observation Conference Form -- page 14 and page 15 (multiple submissions, minimum of two to be competed by the end of the year. These should be spread-out during the year. )

3. Year End Evaluation Form -- page 16 and page 17  (to be completed by April 30th)

Please note that all timelines are recommended

Plan IIPlan II 1. Professional Growth Teacher Evaluation Goal Outline Form -- page 25 and page 26. (to be completed by October 25th).

2.  Conference Observation Form  -- page 27 -- (multiple submissions, minimum of two to be completed by April 30th)

3.  Professional Growth Year End Evaluation Form -- page 28 and page 29 -- (to be completed by May 7th)

1. Professional Growth Teacher Evaluation Goal Outline Form -- page 25 and page 26. (to be completed by October 25th).

2.  Conference Observation Form  -- page 27 -- (multiple submissions, minimum of two to be completed by April 30th)

3.  Professional Growth Year End Evaluation Form -- page 28 and page 29 -- (to be completed by May 7th)

ObservationsObservations Performance evaluations must include classroom observations. MCL 380.1249

The observer must review 1. Lesson Plans 2. State Curriculum Used 3. Pupil Engagement

Performance evaluations must include classroom observations. MCL 380.1249

The observer must review 1. Lesson Plans 2. State Curriculum Used 3. Pupil Engagement

ObservationsObservations

-Administrators can still conduct informational/walkthrough observations and use the information gathered for the evaluation document

-Administrators can still conduct informational/walkthrough observations and use the information gathered for the evaluation document

HR Website / Bloghttp://humanresources.dearbornschools.org/

HR Website / Bloghttp://humanresources.dearbornschools.org/

Rate the LessonRate the Lesson Based on what you observed of the lesson, how would your rate the teacher? (understanding that this is just a snapshot

Highly Effective Effective Minimally Effective Ineffective

Based on what you observed of the lesson, how would your rate the teacher? (understanding that this is just a snapshot

Highly Effective Effective Minimally Effective Ineffective

ObservationsObservations

What are the strengths? What are the weaknesses? What do you still wonder after viewing a snapshot of the lesson? What questions?

What recommendations might you have?

What are the strengths? What are the weaknesses? What do you still wonder after viewing a snapshot of the lesson? What questions?

What recommendations might you have?