tceq lamar sep project (task 2b) camx modeling on flare ... · 6/29/2011  · - current flare ei...

18
TCEQ Lamar SEP Project (Task 2B) CAMx Modeling on Flare Speciation Thomas C. Ho, Professor and Chair Dan F. Smith Department of Chemical Engineering Lamar University For Presentation at the TCEQ June SETPMTC Meeting June 29, 2011

Upload: others

Post on 15-Mar-2021

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: TCEQ Lamar SEP Project (Task 2B) CAMx Modeling on Flare ... · 6/29/2011  · - Current Flare EI Assume 98% CE and with Fixed Speciation - May Not Be Appropriate Under All Flaring

TCEQ Lamar SEP Project (Task 2B)

CAMx Modeling on Flare Speciation

Thomas C. Ho, Professor and Chair

Dan F. Smith Department of Chemical Engineering

Lamar University

For Presentation at the TCEQ June SETPMTC Meeting

June 29, 2011

Page 2: TCEQ Lamar SEP Project (Task 2B) CAMx Modeling on Flare ... · 6/29/2011  · - Current Flare EI Assume 98% CE and with Fixed Speciation - May Not Be Appropriate Under All Flaring

2Dan F. Smith Department of Chemical Engineering, Lamar University

Background and Objective

● Background- Current Flare EI Assume 98% CE and with Fixed Speciation

- May Not Be Appropriate Under All Flaring Conditions

- Being Investigated Under the Current Flare Speciation Project

● Objective in CAMx Modeling- To Simulate the Effect of Flare Speciation on Ozone Formation

- Task 1: Worst Case Scenarios (Various CE of 98% down to 70%)

- Task 2: Specific Effects Based on the Flare Speciation Study

● Approach in Worst Case Scenarios- Modification of Flare EIs in Point Sources

- Simulation Using HGB June 2006 Episode (5/31 – 6/15, 2006)

Page 3: TCEQ Lamar SEP Project (Task 2B) CAMx Modeling on Flare ... · 6/29/2011  · - Current Flare EI Assume 98% CE and with Fixed Speciation - May Not Be Appropriate Under All Flaring

3Dan F. Smith Department of Chemical Engineering, Lamar University

Modification of Flare EI

● 436 Flare EIs in the Texas OSD Point Sources- Ozone Season Daily (OSD) from Texas STARS (afs.osd.2006.STARS)

- 436 Treated as Elevated Point Sources

Texas OSD:

51,603 point

sources

Texas OSD:

1,317 flares

Texas OSD:

50,286 stacks

& fugitives

436 flares as

point sources

881 flares as

area sources

or excluded

5,669 st&fu as

point sources

44,617 st&fu as

area sources or

excluded

CAMx Point

Emission File

CAMx Area

Emission Files

Page 4: TCEQ Lamar SEP Project (Task 2B) CAMx Modeling on Flare ... · 6/29/2011  · - Current Flare EI Assume 98% CE and with Fixed Speciation - May Not Be Appropriate Under All Flaring

4Dan F. Smith Department of Chemical Engineering, Lamar University

CAMx Modeling Domain(June 2006 Episode)

Page 5: TCEQ Lamar SEP Project (Task 2B) CAMx Modeling on Flare ... · 6/29/2011  · - Current Flare EI Assume 98% CE and with Fixed Speciation - May Not Be Appropriate Under All Flaring

5Dan F. Smith Department of Chemical Engineering, Lamar University

Calculations of EI Modifications

● Formula for EI Calculations

- l: Combustion Efficiency

- FVOC, FNOX: Emissions of VOC and NOX

- FVent, HVVent: Flowrate and LHV of Vent Gas

- hNOX: Parameter for NOX Formation

● Changes of EI from CE=98% to 70%

- VOC EI Increases to 15.0 Times [(1-0.7)/(1-0.98)]

- NOX EI Decreases to 0.714 Times [0.7/0.98]

VentVOC FF )1( l

VentVentNOXNOX HVFF lh

NOX Difference between the Base

Case and Case 6

VOC Difference

Page 6: TCEQ Lamar SEP Project (Task 2B) CAMx Modeling on Flare ... · 6/29/2011  · - Current Flare EI Assume 98% CE and with Fixed Speciation - May Not Be Appropriate Under All Flaring

6Dan F. Smith Department of Chemical Engineering, Lamar University

Cases Simulated

● Base Case: CE = 98%

● Case 1: CE = 95%

● Case 2: CE = 90%

● Case 3: CE = 85%

● Case 4: CE = 80%

● Case 5: CE = 75%

● Case 6: CE = 70%

Page 7: TCEQ Lamar SEP Project (Task 2B) CAMx Modeling on Flare ... · 6/29/2011  · - Current Flare EI Assume 98% CE and with Fixed Speciation - May Not Be Appropriate Under All Flaring

7Dan F. Smith Department of Chemical Engineering, Lamar University

8-Hr and 1-Hr Ozone and Increment Plots

for Case 6 in the 2x2 km Grids

8-hr

ozone1-hr

ozone

1-hr ozone

increment

8-hr

ozone

increment

Page 8: TCEQ Lamar SEP Project (Task 2B) CAMx Modeling on Flare ... · 6/29/2011  · - Current Flare EI Assume 98% CE and with Fixed Speciation - May Not Be Appropriate Under All Flaring

8Dan F. Smith Department of Chemical Engineering, Lamar University

0

30

60

90

120

150

Ozo

ne (

pp

b)

Base Case

Case 6

CE: 70%

CE: 75%

CE: 80%

CE: 85%

CE: 90%

CE: 95%

5/31 6/01 6/02 6/03 6/04 6/05 6/06 6/07 6/08 6/09 6/10 6/11 6/12 6/13 6/14 6/15

8-Hr Ozone Concentration and Maximum

Ozone Increments in the 2x2 km Grids

Deer Park

Jacinto City

Deer Park

BellaireMissouri City

Page 9: TCEQ Lamar SEP Project (Task 2B) CAMx Modeling on Flare ... · 6/29/2011  · - Current Flare EI Assume 98% CE and with Fixed Speciation - May Not Be Appropriate Under All Flaring

9Dan F. Smith Department of Chemical Engineering, Lamar University

8-Hr and 1-Hr Ozone Increments (Domain Maximum and 3 Peak Locations in Case 6)

5/31-6/15

Domain

Maximum

6/4/2006

Deer Park

6/9/2009

Bellaire

6/12/2006

Deer Park

8-hr 1-hr 8-hr 1-hr 8-hr 1-hr 8-hr 1-hr

Case 1

(95%)8.9 14.9 7.0 12.4 0.5 1.2 8.9 14.2

Case 2

(90%)22.0 34.4 18.7 30.8 1.3 2.9 22.0 32.7

Case 3

(85%)32.4 50.8 29.5 44.7 2.0 4.4 32.4 45.8

Case 4

(80%)40.6 66.9 39.6 61.6 2.6 5.8 40.6 56.6

Case 5

(75%)48.9 84.1 48.9 76.3 3.2 6.9 47.1 66.7

Case 6

(70%)57.4 99.1 57.4 88.4 3.8 8.0 52.4 74.6

Page 10: TCEQ Lamar SEP Project (Task 2B) CAMx Modeling on Flare ... · 6/29/2011  · - Current Flare EI Assume 98% CE and with Fixed Speciation - May Not Be Appropriate Under All Flaring

10Dan F. Smith Department of Chemical Engineering, Lamar University0

30

60

90

120

150

Ozo

ne (

pp

b)

Base Case

Domain Max

Case 6

CE: 70%

CE: 75%

CE: 80%

CE: 85%

CE: 90%

CE: 95%

5/31 6/01 6/02 6/03 6/04 6/05 6/06 6/07 6/08 6/09 6/10 6/11 6/12 6/13 6/14 6/15

8-Hr Ozone for the Deer Park Site

(Base Case, Case 6, and Ozone Increments)

Deer

Park

Page 11: TCEQ Lamar SEP Project (Task 2B) CAMx Modeling on Flare ... · 6/29/2011  · - Current Flare EI Assume 98% CE and with Fixed Speciation - May Not Be Appropriate Under All Flaring

11Dan F. Smith Department of Chemical Engineering, Lamar University

Ozone Animation for June 4th

Max 8-hour

Ozone

Value

Base Case 112.8

ppb

VOC-Limited

Ozone

57.0

ppb

Case 6 Ozone

Increment

57.4

ppbOzone Increment Base Case VOC-Limited Ozone

Base Case NOX-Limited OzoneBase Case Ozone

Page 12: TCEQ Lamar SEP Project (Task 2B) CAMx Modeling on Flare ... · 6/29/2011  · - Current Flare EI Assume 98% CE and with Fixed Speciation - May Not Be Appropriate Under All Flaring

12Dan F. Smith Department of Chemical Engineering, Lamar University

Ozone Animation for June 12th

Ozone Increment Base Case VOC-Limited Ozone

Base Case NOX-Limited OzoneBase Case Ozone

Max 8-hour

Ozone

Value

Base Case 91.0

ppb

VOC-Limited

Ozone

54.0

ppb

Case 6 Ozone

Increment

52.4

ppb

Page 13: TCEQ Lamar SEP Project (Task 2B) CAMx Modeling on Flare ... · 6/29/2011  · - Current Flare EI Assume 98% CE and with Fixed Speciation - May Not Be Appropriate Under All Flaring

13Dan F. Smith Department of Chemical Engineering, Lamar University0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

110

120

Ozo

ne (

pp

b)

Base Case

Domain Max

Case 6

CE: 70%

CE: 75%

CE: 80%

CE: 85%

CE: 90%

CE: 95%

5/31 6/01 6/02 6/03 6/04 6/05 6/06 6/07 6/08 6/09 6/10 6/11 6/12 6/13 6/14 6/15

8-Hr Ozone for the Bellaire Site

(Base Case, Case 6 and Ozone Increments)

Bellaire

Page 14: TCEQ Lamar SEP Project (Task 2B) CAMx Modeling on Flare ... · 6/29/2011  · - Current Flare EI Assume 98% CE and with Fixed Speciation - May Not Be Appropriate Under All Flaring

14Dan F. Smith Department of Chemical Engineering, Lamar University

Ozone Animation for June 9th

Ozone Increment Base Case VOC-Limited Ozone

Base Case NOX-Limited OzoneBase Case Ozone

Max 8-hour

Ozone

Value

Base Case 107.4

ppb

VOC-Limited

Ozone

54.0

ppb

Case 6 Ozone

Increment

14.9

ppb

Page 15: TCEQ Lamar SEP Project (Task 2B) CAMx Modeling on Flare ... · 6/29/2011  · - Current Flare EI Assume 98% CE and with Fixed Speciation - May Not Be Appropriate Under All Flaring

15Dan F. Smith Department of Chemical Engineering, Lamar University

8-Hr and 1-Hr Ozone Increments (Domain Maximum and 3 Peak Locations in Base Case)

5/31-6/15

Domain

Maximum

6/4/2006

Jacinto City

6/9/2006

Bellaire

6/12/2006

Missouri City

8-hr 1-hr 8-hr 1-hr 8-hr 1-hr 8-hr 1-hr

Case 1

(95%)8.9 14.9 2.6 4.9 0.5 1.2 0.2 0.3

Case 2

(90%)22.0 34.4 6.1 11.7 1.3 2.9 0.4 0.7

Case 3

(85%)32.4 50.8 8.8 16.7 2.0 4.4 0.7 1.1

Case 4

(80%)40.6 66.9 10.8 20.3 2.6 5.8 0.9 1.5

Case 5

(75%)48.9 84.1 12.5 23.2 3.2 6.9 1.2 1.9

Case 6

(70%)57.4 99.1 13.9 25.6 3.8 8.0 1.4 2.3

Page 16: TCEQ Lamar SEP Project (Task 2B) CAMx Modeling on Flare ... · 6/29/2011  · - Current Flare EI Assume 98% CE and with Fixed Speciation - May Not Be Appropriate Under All Flaring

16Dan F. Smith Department of Chemical Engineering, Lamar University0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

110

120

130

Ozo

ne (

pp

b)

Base Case

Domain Max

Case 6

CE: 70%

CE: 75%

CE: 80%

CE: 85%

CE: 90%

CE: 95%

5/31 6/01 6/02 6/03 6/04 6/05 6/06 6/07 6/08 6/09 6/10 6/11 6/12 6/13 6/14 6/15

8-Hr Ozone for the Jacinto City Site

(Base Case, Case 6 and Ozone Increments)

Jacinto

City

Page 17: TCEQ Lamar SEP Project (Task 2B) CAMx Modeling on Flare ... · 6/29/2011  · - Current Flare EI Assume 98% CE and with Fixed Speciation - May Not Be Appropriate Under All Flaring

17Dan F. Smith Department of Chemical Engineering, Lamar University0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

110

Ozo

ne (

pp

b)

Base Case

Domain Max

Case 6

CE: 70%

CE: 75%

CE: 80%

CE: 85%

CE: 90%

CE: 95%

5/31 6/01 6/02 6/03 6/04 6/05 6/06 6/07 6/08 6/09 6/10 6/11 6/12 6/13 6/14 6/15

8-Hr Ozone for the Missouri City Site

(Base Case, Case 6 and Ozone Increments)

Missouri City

Page 18: TCEQ Lamar SEP Project (Task 2B) CAMx Modeling on Flare ... · 6/29/2011  · - Current Flare EI Assume 98% CE and with Fixed Speciation - May Not Be Appropriate Under All Flaring

18Dan F. Smith Department of Chemical Engineering, Lamar University

Concluding Remarks

● Flaring CE Affects Ozone Concentration

● Lower Flaring CEs correspond to Higher Ozone

Increments

● Maximum 8-hr Ozone Increments at CE=0.7 Could

Be as High as 57.4 ppb during June 2006 Episode

● Maximum Ozone Increments Occur Near Flaring

Sources

● Maximum Ozone Increments Occur in VOC-Limited

Area