tax policy and charitable giving
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Tax policy and charitable giving](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022020116/559c21ee1a28ab3d6a8b45de/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
1
U.S. Tax Policy and Charitable Giving
1
How much, for whom, to what end?
![Page 2: Tax policy and charitable giving](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022020116/559c21ee1a28ab3d6a8b45de/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2
The raising of extraordinarily large sums of money, given voluntarily and freely by millions of our fellow Americans, is a unique American tradition... Philanthropy, charity, giving voluntarily and freely... call it what you like, but it is truly a jewel of an American tradition.
--John F. Kennedy
![Page 3: Tax policy and charitable giving](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022020116/559c21ee1a28ab3d6a8b45de/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3
2009 Charitable Giving in U.S.Total = $303.75 Billion
![Page 4: Tax policy and charitable giving](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022020116/559c21ee1a28ab3d6a8b45de/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
4
Who Benefits
![Page 5: Tax policy and charitable giving](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022020116/559c21ee1a28ab3d6a8b45de/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
5
U.S. Giving Compared to Other Countries (2005)
Country Giving as % of GDP
United States 1.67
United Kingdom 0.73
Canada 0.72
Australia 0.69
South Africa 0.64
Rep of Ireland 0.47
Netherlands 0.45
Singapore and New Zealand 0.29
France 0.14
Source: Charities Aid Foundation, November 2006
![Page 6: Tax policy and charitable giving](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022020116/559c21ee1a28ab3d6a8b45de/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
6
U.S. Tax Incentives for Giving
• Individuals and corporations that itemize can deduct a certain percentage (depending on their level of income) of charitable donations from their federal income tax. – Individual itemizers represent about 35 percent of
taxpayers; 90% claim a charitable deduction.
• Full deductions for bequests.– 18% of estates filing estate tax returns make charitable
bequests.
• Most states with personal income taxes have some type of tax incentive for charitable giving.
Source: U.S. Dept of Treasury, Joulfaian, 2005.
![Page 7: Tax policy and charitable giving](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022020116/559c21ee1a28ab3d6a8b45de/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
7
Proposed Tax Changes
.33 - .35 cents
.28 cents
![Page 8: Tax policy and charitable giving](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022020116/559c21ee1a28ab3d6a8b45de/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
8
Criticisms and Claims
• Reducing the charitable deduction will “crowd out” civil society and discourage charitable donations.
• It will shift resources from private nonprofit charitable organizations to the federal government, which is consistently less effective and efficient in caring for the needy.
--Messmore, The Heritage Foundation
![Page 9: Tax policy and charitable giving](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022020116/559c21ee1a28ab3d6a8b45de/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
9
Questions
• How much is giving affected by tax incentives?
• Whom do tax incentives benefit?
• To what end do/should tax incentives exist (if at all)?
![Page 10: Tax policy and charitable giving](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022020116/559c21ee1a28ab3d6a8b45de/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
10
How Much?
Tax incentives essentially lower the cost of giving.
For an itemizer in the 28% tax bracket:
Giving $100 Net cost = $72
Tax price
![Page 11: Tax policy and charitable giving](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022020116/559c21ee1a28ab3d6a8b45de/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
11
How Much?
Price elasticity of giving = How responsive giving is to a change in its cost.
If reduce cost of giving by 50%:
What is the price elasticity of giving?
If > 1.0 it is “treasury efficient” = increase giving > estimated revenue cost of tax subsidy/incentive
Price Elasticity Change in Giving Example
-1.0 Increase giving 50% $100 $150
-0.5 Increase giving 25% $100 $125
![Page 12: Tax policy and charitable giving](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022020116/559c21ee1a28ab3d6a8b45de/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
12
How Much?Studies on the price elasticity of giving show mixed results:•Clotfelter (1985) found a range for the elasticity of charitable giving relative to changes in the tax price of giving of between -1.1 and -1.3.•More recent studies have challenged the conclusion that giving is so sensitive, estimating price elasticities that are much smaller or even positive.
– e.g. Barrett, McGuirk, and Steinberg (1997, p. 321) found, using panel data, price elasticity at +.47.
•The Tax Reform Act of 1986 increased the after-tax cost of giving, often significantly, but the predicted drop in giving did not materialize.
![Page 13: Tax policy and charitable giving](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022020116/559c21ee1a28ab3d6a8b45de/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
13
How Much?
• Giving as percent of GDP has remained about the same for past 40 years (ave. 1.9%)
Source: Giving USA
![Page 14: Tax policy and charitable giving](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022020116/559c21ee1a28ab3d6a8b45de/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
14
Estimated Impact of Proposed Tax Changes
• Policy centers estimate ranges from little to no impact to a decrease of 12%.
• Many already limited to 28% deduction.
• Many other factors influence giving.
.33 - .35 cents
.28 cents
![Page 15: Tax policy and charitable giving](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022020116/559c21ee1a28ab3d6a8b45de/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
15
How Much?Not all donors are motivated in the same way by tax incentives.•Center on Philanthropy study of wealthy donors found 52% said giving would remain the same if they no longer received any income-tax deduction for donations.
– 37% said giving would “somewhat decrease” and 10% said it would “dramatically decrease.”
•Independent Sector found only about 1/3 of respondents in 1989 and 1991 Giving and Volunteering Surveys reported tax considerations and deductions as major or minor motivation to give to charity.
– Tax considerations major motivation, price elasticity of giving - 2.21– Tax considerations minor motivation, price elasticity of giving - 0.79– Tax considerations no motivation, price elasticity of giving 0.02
![Page 16: Tax policy and charitable giving](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022020116/559c21ee1a28ab3d6a8b45de/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
16
How Much?Sensitivity to charitable tax incentives also differs among types of funding areas
•Educational institutions and hospitals very sensitive •Health and social welfare less sensitive •Religious organizations least sensitive
![Page 17: Tax policy and charitable giving](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022020116/559c21ee1a28ab3d6a8b45de/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
17
Environmentand animals
$6.602.2%
Foundations$29.50 10.0%
Humanservices$29.56 10.0%
Internationalaffairs$11.343.8%
Arts, culture, and humanities
$12.514.2%Public-society
benefit$21.417.3%
Unallocatedgiving$26.088.8%
Health $20.226.9%
Religion $96.82 32.8%
Education$40.98 13.9%
Types of recipients of contributions, 2006, total = $295.02 billion
![Page 18: Tax policy and charitable giving](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022020116/559c21ee1a28ab3d6a8b45de/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
18
Who Benefits• Google /The Center on Philanthropy study (2007) found
“less than one-third of the money individuals gave to nonprofits was focused on the needs of the economically disadvantaged.”
• Institute for Jewish and Community Research found only 5% of the total dollars from mega-gifts (gifts of $1 million dollars or more) go to social service groups.– 44% to colleges and universities, – 16% hospitals and other medical institutions – 12% arts and cultural organizations
• Charitable organizations that rely heavily on giving are less likely to serve the poor (Salamon, 1992; Galaskiewicz, 2005).
![Page 19: Tax policy and charitable giving](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022020116/559c21ee1a28ab3d6a8b45de/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
19
Who Benefits
Country Giving as % of GDP
GiniIndex
% Child w/ Income < 50% of Median
United States 1.67 40.8 21.7
United Kingdom 0.73 36.0 16.2
Canada 0.72 32.6 13.6
Australia 0.69 35.2 11.6
Netherlands 0.45 30.9 9.0
Germany 0.22 28.3 10.9
France 0.14 32.7 7.3
![Page 20: Tax policy and charitable giving](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022020116/559c21ee1a28ab3d6a8b45de/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
20
Who DecidesWealthier individuals have more of a say in who benefits: •Those at the highest tax bracket (35% in the U.S. in 2008) receive the largest deduction, those in the lowest tax bracket (10%) receive the lowest deduction.
![Page 21: Tax policy and charitable giving](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022020116/559c21ee1a28ab3d6a8b45de/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
21
Who Decides?
Public revenues lost as a result of charitable tax deductions were estimated to be more than $50 billion in 2008.
•4th largest tax expenditure•More than half of the annual budget for the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. •Nearly 20 times what the U.S. spends on international development assistance.
![Page 22: Tax policy and charitable giving](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022020116/559c21ee1a28ab3d6a8b45de/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
22
For What?• Charitable tax incentives rest on the assumption that
individual donors, rather than government officials, “should have a stronger voice in determining how the needs of low-income families and communities are addressed” (De Vita & Twombly, 2005, p. 570). – Clearly not adequate for addressing social welfare issues.– Providing interventions to compel donors for social welfare
compromises one of most valuable aspects of philanthropy-- donors’ freedom to choose.
– Allows wealthy to decide.
![Page 23: Tax policy and charitable giving](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022020116/559c21ee1a28ab3d6a8b45de/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
23
Conclusion• Reich—providing tax incentives really only makes sense
in encouraging equal opportunities for citizens to participate in civil society.– Flat and capped nonrefundable tax credit for charitable
donations.
• More progressive tax policies that compel wealthy individuals to pay a greater share into government coffers.