tax pbcom v cir

1
PHIL. BANK OF COMMUNICATIONS v. CIR GR No. 112024, January 28, 1999 302 SCRA 250 FACTS: Petitioner PBCom filed its first and second quarter income tax returns, reported profits, and paid income taxes amounting to P5.2M in 1985. However, at the end of the year PBCom suffered losses so that when it filed its Annual Income Tax Returns for the year-ended December 31, 1986, the petitioner likewise reported a net loss of P14.1 M, and thus declared no tax payable for the year. In 1988, the bank requested from CIR for a tax credit and tax refunds representing overpayment of taxes. Pending investigation of the respondent CIR, petitioner instituted a Petition for Review before the Court of Tax Appeals (CTA). CTA denied its petition for tax credit and refund for failing to file within the prescriptive period to which the petitioner belies arguing the Revenue Circular No.7-85 issued by the CIR itself states that claim for overpaid taxes are not covered by the two-year prescriptive period mandated under the Tax Code. ISSUE: Is the contention of the petitioner correct? Is the revenue circular a valid exemption to the NIRC? HELD: No. The relaxation of revenue regulations by RMC 7-85 is not warranted as it disregards the two-year prescriptive period set by law. Basic is the principle that "taxes are the lifeblood of the nation." The primary purpose is to generate funds for the State to finance the needs of the citizenry and to advance the common weal. Due process of law under the Constitution does not require judicial proceedings in tax cases. This must necessarily be so because it is upon taxation that the government chiefly relies to obtain the means to carry on its operations and it is of utmost importance that the modes adopted to enforce the collection of taxes levied should be summary and interfered with as little as possible. From the same perspective, claims for refund or tax credit should be exercised within the time fixed by law because the BIR being an administrative body enforced to collect taxes, its functions should not be unduly delayed or hampered by incidental matters.

Upload: jazz-adaza

Post on 08-Dec-2015

220 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

DESCRIPTION

Taxation Case PBCom vs Commissioner if internal revenue

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Tax pbcom v Cir

PHIL. BANK OF COMMUNICATIONS v. CIR

GR No. 112024, January 28, 1999

302 SCRA 250

FACTS: Petitioner PBCom filed its first and second quarter income tax returns, reported profits, and paid

income

taxes amounting to P5.2M in 1985. However, at the end of the year PBCom suffered losses so that when it

filed

its Annual Income Tax Returns for the year-ended December 31, 1986, the petitioner likewise reported a net

loss of P14.1 M, and thus declared no tax payable for the year. In 1988, the bank requested from CIR for a tax

credit and tax refunds representing overpayment of taxes. Pending investigation of the respondent CIR,

petitioner instituted a Petition for Review before the Court of Tax Appeals (CTA). CTA denied its petition for

tax

credit and refund for failing to file within the prescriptive period to which the petitioner belies arguing the

Revenue Circular No.7-85 issued by the CIR itself states that claim for overpaid taxes are not covered by the

two-year prescriptive period mandated under the Tax Code.

ISSUE: Is the contention of the petitioner correct? Is the revenue circular a valid exemption to the NIRC?

HELD: No. The relaxation of revenue regulations by RMC 7-85 is not warranted as it disregards the two-year

prescriptive period set by law.

Basic is the principle that "taxes are the lifeblood of the nation." The primary purpose is to generate funds for

the State to finance the needs of the citizenry and to advance the common weal. Due process of law under the

Constitution does not require judicial proceedings in tax cases. This must necessarily be so because it is upon

taxation that the government chiefly relies to obtain the means to carry on its operations and it is of utmost

importance that the modes adopted to enforce the collection of taxes levied should be summary and interfered

with as little as possible.

From the same perspective, claims for refund or tax credit should be exercised within the time fixed by law

because the BIR being an administrative body enforced to collect taxes, its functions should not be unduly

delayed or hampered by incidental matters.