task three report: appendix - final draft 3... · task three report: appendix - final draft....

MADRID’S MINING LANDSCAPEMADRID, NEW MEXICO April 25, 2011

TASK THREE REPORT: APPENDIX - FINAL DRAFT

KARPOFF AND ASSOCIATES

MADRID ’S MINING LANDSCAPE

Appendix A Funding Partners

Appendix B Implementation Partners

Appendix C Parcel Ownership/Maps

Appendix D Stakeholders Listings

Appendix E Technical Memorandum: Madrid Coal Waste Characterization

Appendix F Miscellaneous

KARPOFF AND ASSOCIATES

TABLE OF CONTENTS

A-1

App

endi

x A


Org

aniz

atio

n

Ro

le o

r Ju

risd

icti

on

F

un

din

g

Ab

and

on

ed M

ine

Lan

d P

rogr

am

Min

ing

Haz

ard

s an

d I

mp

acts

F

eder

al, c

apit

al i

mp

lem

enta

tio

n f

un

din

g

San

ta F

e C

ou

nty

O

pen

Sp

ace/

Pu

bli

c W

ork

s

Pla

nn

ing/

Lan

d U

se

Sta

te A

gen

cies

DF

A-

Lo

cal G

ove

rnm

ent

Div

isio

n

Smal

l Co

mm

un

ity

Infr

astr

uct

ure

C

om

mu

nit

y D

evel

op

men

t B

lock

Gra

nt s

Surf

ace

Wat

er B

ure

au

Cle

an W

ater

Act

C

lean

Wat

er A

ct 3

19(h

) gr

ants

Riv

er E

cosy

stem

Res

tora

tio

n I

nit

iati

ve

NM

Dep

artm

ent

of

Tra

nsp

ort

atio

n

Hig

hw

ay 1

4 R

OW

ST

IP f

un

din

g

Dri

nk

ing

Wat

er B

ure

au

Wat

er S

yste

m i

nfr

astr

uct

ure

D

rin

kin

g W

ater

Rev

olv

ing

Lo

an F

un

d

NG

O

Gal

iste

o W

ater

shed

Par

tner

ship

W

ater

shed

res

tora

tio

n

Gra

nt

Man

agem

ent

Rai

ls t

o T

rail

s C

on

serv

ancy

R

ailw

ay c

on

vers

ion

to

Tra

il

Tec

hn

ical

Ass

ista

nce

Qu

ivir

a C

oal

itio

n

Wat

ersh

ed r

esto

rati

on

G

ran

t M

anag

emen

t

Ear

th W

ork

s In

stit

ute

E

colo

gica

l res

tora

tio

n

Gra

nt

man

agem

ent

San

ta F

e B

ota

nic

al G

ard

en

Man

ages

th

e O

rtiz

Mo

un

tain

Ed

uca

tio

nal

Pre

serv

e

Gra

nt

Man

agem

ent

Op

en S

pac

e p

artn

er

Fed

eral

Ag

enci

es

Nat

ion

al P

ark

Ser

vice

H

isto

ric

Pre

serv

atio

n

Ou

tdo

or

Rec

reat

ion

In

itia

tive

s

Pre

serv

e A

mer

ica

Lan

d a

nd

Wat

er C

on

serv

atio

n F

un

d

Riv

ers,

Tra

ils

and

Co

nse

rvat

ion

Ass

ista

nce

USD

A C

oo

per

ativ

e St

ate

Res

earc

h,

Ed

uca

tio

n, a

nd

Ext

ensi

on

Ser

vice

F

oo

d S

ecu

rity

C

om

mu

nit

y F

oo

d P

roje

cts

Co

mp

etit

ive

Gra

nts

Pro

gram

USD

E N

atu

ral R

eso

urc

e C

on

serv

atio

n

Serv

ice

Wat

ersh

ed R

esto

rati

on

W

ater

shed

Pro

tect

ion

an

d F

loo

d P

reve

nti

on

Pro

gram

Em

erge

ncy

Wat

ersh

ed P

rote

ctio

n

Off

ice

of

Surf

ace

Min

ing

Min

ing

Haz

ard

s an

d I

mp

acts

St

ate

AM

LP

gra

nts

En

viro

nm

enta

l p

rote

ctio

n A

gen

cy

Wat

ersh

ed R

esto

rati

on

F

ive

Star

Res

tora

tio

n P

rogr

am

Fed

eral

Hig

hw

ay A

dm

inis

trat

ion

H

isto

ric

pre

serv

atio

n,

Rai

ls t

o t

rail

s co

nve

rsio

n

Nat

ion

al S

cen

ic B

yway

s P

rogr

am

Rec

reat

ion

al T

rail

s P

rogr

am

Nat

ion

al T

ran

spo

rtat

ion

En

han

cem

ents

Cle

arin

gho

use

US

Arm

y C

orp

s o

f E

ngi

nee

rs

Flo

od

Co

ntr

ol

Smal

l Flo

od

Dam

age

Red

uct

ion

Pro

ject

s

FUN

DIN

G P

AR

TN

ERS

A-2

App

endi

x A


A-3

App

endi

x A


A-4

App

endi

x A


A-5

App

endi

x A


A-6

App

endi

x A


A-7

App

endi

x A


A-8

App

endi

x A


A-9

App

endi

x A


A-10

App

endi

x A


A-11

App

endi

x A


A-12

App

endi

x A


A-12 A-13

App

endi

x A


A-14

App

endi

x A


A-15

App

endi

x A


A-16

App

endi

x A


A-17

App

endi

x A


A-18

App

endi

x A


B-1

App

endi

x B


Org

aniz

atio

n

Pro

ject

Ph

ase

Reg

ula

tory

/Per

mit

tin

g

Pla

nn

ing

/En

gin

eeri

ng

C

on

stru

ctio

n

Op

erat

ion

/Ma

inte

nan

ce

Ab

and

on

ed M

ine

Lan

d P

rogr

am

NE

PA

Co

mp

lian

ce

Sup

ervi

ses

all e

ngi

nee

rin

g

des

ign

/p

lan

nin

g

Co

ntr

acti

ng

and

Ove

rsig

ht

No

ne

Mad

rid

Pro

per

ty O

wn

ers

C

on

sult

atio

n,

Co

nse

nt

to E

ntr

y C

on

sen

t to

En

try

Vo

lun

teer

s an

d o

wn

ers

Lan

do

wn

ers

Ass

oc

(ML

A)

C

on

sult

atio

n

M

ain

ten

ance

Vo

lun

teer

s

Fir

e D

epar

tmen

t

Co

nsu

ltat

ion

Vo

lun

teer

s

Cu

ltu

ral P

roje

cts

(MC

P)

C

on

sult

atio

n

M

ain

ten

ance

Vo

lun

teer

s

Mer

chan

ts A

sso

c (M

MA

)

Co

nsu

ltat

ion

Wat

er C

oo

p (

MW

C)

C

on

sult

atio

n (

wat

er li

nes

)

DP

S P

lan

nin

g T

eam

Co

mm

un

ity

liai

son

O

vers

igh

t as

req

ues

ted

Lo

cal

Ag

enci

es

San

ta F

e C

ou

nty

Tec

hn

ical

Rev

iew

Co

mm

.

Op

en S

pac

e

Co

un

ty C

om

mis

sio

n

Flo

od

pla

in D

evel

op

men

t,

Sto

rmw

ater

Man

agem

ent,

Ter

rain

Man

agem

ent,

Op

en S

pac

e

Co

nse

nt

to E

ntr

y C

on

sen

t to

En

try

Ove

rsig

ht?

Un

kn

ow

n

Sta

te A

gen

cies

Surf

ace

Wat

er B

ure

au

Gen

. Co

nst

ruct

ion

Per

mit

BM

P I

nsp

ecti

on

s

NM

Dep

artm

ent

of

Tra

nsp

ort

atio

n

C

oo

rdin

atio

n, R

evie

win

g

agen

cy

N

M 1

4 D

rain

age

Stru

ctu

res

Stat

e H

isto

ric

Pre

serv

atio

n O

ffic

e N

EP

A C

on

sult

atio

n

Cu

ltu

ral R

eso

urc

es

Vie

wsh

ed M

itig

atio

n

Inte

rpre

tive

sig

nag

e

Off

ice

of

the

Stat

e E

ngi

nee

r C

on

sult

atio

n (

catc

hm

ents

)

NG

Os

Gal

iste

o W

ater

shed

Ass

oci

atio

n

M

ain

ten

ance

Vo

lun

teer

s

Fed

eral

Ag

enci

es

Off

ice

of

Surf

ace

Min

ing

AM

L p

lan

ap

pro

val

O

vers

igh

t V

ista

, Am

eriC

orp

s

Arm

y C

orp

of

En

gin

eers

40

4 P

erm

itti

ng

IMPL

EMEN

TAT

ION

PA

RT

NER

S

B-2

App

endi

x B


Mad

rid’s

Min

ing

Land

scap

e / M

adrid

, NM

/ 4.

25.1

1

OVE

RALL

PA

RCEL

MA

P

C-1

App

endi

x C

Mad

rid’s

Min

ing

Land

scap

e / M

adrid

, NM

/ 4.

25.1

1

ENLA

RGED

PA

RCEL

MA

P - N

ORT

H

C-3

App

endi

x C

Mad

rid’s

Min

ing

Land

scap

e / M

adrid

, NM

/ 4.

25.1

1

ENLA

RGED

PA

RCEL

MA

P - S

OU

TH

C-5

App

endi

x C

C-6

App

endi

x C


��

��

��

� ��

� ��

� ��

� ��

� ��

� ��

� ��

� ��

� ��

� ��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

C-7

App

endi

x C


��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

C-8

App

endi

x C


��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

C-9

App

endi

x C


��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

C-10

App

endi

x C


��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

C-11

App

endi

x C


��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

C-12

App

endi

x C


��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

Mad

rid’s

Min

ing

Land

scap

e / M

adrid

, NM

/ 4.

25.1

1

Madrids Mining Landscape

List of Stakeholders and ContactsLast Updated 4.5.11

Contact(s) Organization(s)/Affiliation Title/Role e-mail phone (hm.) phone (wk.) Phone (mobile) Address Notes BusinessStakeholdersLast FirstAnderson Clinton MLA/VFD/MCP [email protected] 424-4411 PO BOX 872, Cerrillos, NM 87010Anderson Diana 471-1054 Business ownerBaker Crico [email protected] 424-0738Barden Glen MWC 473-7160Black Kent [email protected] 424-8177 PO BOX 539, Cerrillos, NM 87010Bodei Brian PO BOX 424, Cerrillos, NM 87010Bonewell Melinda [email protected] 474-0344Bramble Amanda MCP [email protected] 780-0535Bremmer Mark MCP [email protected] 438-4347 438-5362 PO BOX 87, Cerrillos, NM 87010Bryan Sid 31716 S COAST HWY, Laguna Beach, CA 92651 RealtorBusch FrankCabrielle Cathasha MLA [email protected] 470-4041 PO BOX 660, Cerrillos, NM 87010Conley Lisa MLA [email protected] 473-4945 2870 STATE HIGHWAY 14, Cerrillos, NM 87010 Business owner Conley Studio PotteryContraras Anne MLA 424-8995 Business OwnerConway Nigel, Sabine [email protected] or [email protected] 982-1880 28 BACK RD, Cerrillos, NM 87010Cook, Flynn Jo, Gregg Huber Hiers [email protected] 400-1861 379-6099Coulthard, Carroll Stephanie, Jeff MVD [email protected] 424-0949 53 BACKROAD, Cerrillos, NM 87010Davis Elizabeth [email protected] 827-0333 PO BOX 607, Cerrillos, NM 87010Delmas Silivianne [email protected] 474-6720DeLuna Flor 438-3294Dickson, Fitzgerald Paul, Susan MLA 474-4893 2878 STATE HIGHWAY 14, Cerrillos, NM 87010 Business owner Weasel and FitzDickson, Fitzgerald Paul, Susan MLA Paul- Chairperson 474-4893 2878 STATE HIGHWAY 14, Cerrillos, NM 87010 Business owner Weasel and FitzDietrich Ellen [email protected] 474-6535Dodd Dennis, Linda [email protected] or [email protected] 544-2369 PO BOX 278, Cerrillos, NM 87010Duncan Mary Huber Hiers [email protected] 379-6099 5 PEACEFUL WAY, Cerrillos, NM 87010Duncan Casey, Nancy MLA [email protected] 5 PEACEFUL WAY, Cerrillos, NM 87010 Java JunctionDunnill Linda MLA [email protected] 474-8359 2853 STATE HWY 14, Cerrillos, NM 87010Duval Robert [email protected] 424-3219 260 WOODWARD ROAD, Brooklyn, CT 06234Edwards Dale MCP 2885 HWY 14, Cerrillos, NM 87010Farber Lyndsay VFDForloney Bethany MCP 474-8813 Business owner Metallo GalleryFrench, Novak Matt, Heaather MLA [email protected] or [email protected] 474-5927 795-3536Garcia Danette MCP [email protected] 473-0783Hackett Honore MMA Secretary [email protected] 2867 NM 14, Cerrillos, NM 87010Hansen Carl 470-0770 424-9793 PO BOX 479, Cerrillos, NM 87010Henderson Sarah [email protected] 473-0895 1805 RIDGECREST DR SE, Alb. NM 87108Hernandez Felix 1125 GOLDMINE RD, Cerrrillos, NM 87010Hogrebe Bill [email protected] 2868 HIGHWAY 14, Cerrillos, NM 87010Huber Oscar Huber Hiers [email protected] 896-6996 975-4739 3331 Columbia NE 87101 Contemporary Classic DesignInterlandi Lisa MLA 471-5769 2859 HWY 14, Madird, NM 87010Johnson Mel, Diane MLA/MCP/MMA/MWC [email protected] 471-1054 P.O. Box 688, Cerrillos, NM 87010 Business owner Johnsons of MadridJones Denise MCP Secretary [email protected] 471-9244 2875 Hwy 14, Madrid, NM 87010 Business owner ResourcesKaltenbach Mark MLA [email protected] 471-1108 2834 HIGHWAY 14 N, Cerrillos, NM 87010Kitzrow Clilf, Ede 473-0743 2883 ST HWY 14, Madrid, NM 87010

Kutchei Jeffrey MCP jeffery@themine 473-0743Lindsey Lori MLA/MMA/MWC/MCP/TTA [email protected] 473-0743 2865 HWY 14, Cerrillos, NM 87010 Business owner The Mine Shaft TavernMarek Julie [email protected] 474-6282 PO BOX 833, Cerrillos, NM 87010Martin Paul PO BOX 160, Cerrillos, NM 87010Mayhew ChrisMcClane Lynn MLA/MMA/MWC/MCP/TTA [email protected] 438-8711 986-1864 PO BOX 883, Cerrillos, NM 87010 Business Owner TumbleweedsMcDaniel Waz 2806 NM 14, Madrid, NM 87010McIntosh Bruce MCP [email protected] 690-8178 124 Wild Dog Road, Madrid, NM 87010 Business owner Wild Dog PhotographyMesser Greg, Caroline [email protected] 650-619-9013 Muth Joanna Huber Hiers [email protected] 505-440-5022 Nafey Rebecca MLA, MWC [email protected] 473-3636 438-7330 Realtor Sea propertiesNeff Glenn MCP/MMA [email protected] 474-0033Novak Josh MLA [email protected] 471-4821 2890 NM 14, Cerrillos, NM 87010Olsen Paul MLA [email protected] 438-2588 2850 NM 14, Madrid, NM 87010Paolillo Lana [email protected] 9 AVON St, Seekonk MA 02771Peppler Patty Neighboring Landowners [email protected] 379-7377 P.O. Box 1535, Cedar Crest, NM Business ownerPernia Mark 469-0149 14354 LAUREL DR, Riverside, CA 92503Phillips Ron PO BOX 544, Stratford, CT 06615Reifman Marcia MWC Secretary [email protected] or [email protected] 471-2419 PO BOX 305, Cerrillos, NM 87010Roberts Patricia 610-2211Robinson Laurie MCP [email protected] 474-4257Roedel Micheal, Anna Rogersville Landowners [email protected] 505-920-1110 P.O. Box 611, Cerrillos, NMSelby Robert MWC [email protected] 474-3293 2866 STATE HWY 14 N HOUSE #22, Cerrillos, NM 87010Shephard Steve MLA/VFD/MCP [email protected] 474-3433 780-0220Sours HarryStafien Jim Huber HiersStrathdee Gaven, Eleanor MLA/Water Coop 471-7296Thomas Dick [email protected] 471-1036Valenzuela Alex [email protected] 471-9221 PO BOX 342, Cerrillos, NM 87010Wawrek Gerry 471-0021 2841 HWY 14, Cerrillos, NM 87010

L:\09-0040 Madrid Mine Community Plan\Presentation\InDesign\Task 3 Report\Lists\2009-06 Madrid contact list_ full working list

STA

KEH

OLD

ER L

ISTI

NG

D-1

App

endi

x D

Mad

rid’s

Min

ing

Land

scap

e / M

adrid

, NM

/ 4.

25.1

1

Weissmuller Margaret 424- 3135 134 S QUITMAN ST, Denver, CO 80219Welter Art 473-9303Winders Gary 424-9193 310-4042 PO Box 705, Cerrillos, NM 87010Wright Mike, Joyce MCP [email protected] 438-9146 1 TIPPLE WAY, Cerrillos, NM 87010Zellman John 660-0783

State AgenciesEnsey Ensey SHPO Archaeologist [email protected] 827-4064Moody Moody SHPO State and National Register [email protected]

Santa Fe CountyAnaya Mike Cty. CommissionerSill Duncan Cty. Planning Economic Development [email protected] Colleen Cty. Open Space Project Manager [email protected] 992-9868Mills Beth Cty. Open Space Planner [email protected] Renee SF County Planner Community Planner [email protected] 986-6236Cobau Shelley Technical Review Committee ChairpersonGriego Robert Planning Manager Planning Manager [email protected]

Galisteo Watershed PartnershipJansen Jan-Willem Earth Works Institute Executive Director [email protected], Lockridge Anne, Ross [email protected] Bill [email protected] Walter [email protected]

Madrid Cultural ProjectsShepard Steve MMA PresidentWright Wright MCP [email protected] 438-9146Cabrielle Cathasha MLA [email protected] Denise MCP Secretary [email protected] Dale MCP [email protected] 424-3413

Madrid Landowners Association PO BOX 237, Cerrillos, NM 87010Interlandi Lisa MLA Board Member 471-5769Nafey Rebecca MLA Board Member [email protected] 473-3636 438-7330 Business Owner Sea propertiesMcClane McClane MLA Board Member 438-8711 Business Owner TumbleweedsDickson, Fitzgerald Paul Susan MLA Chairperson 474-4893 Business owner Weasel and FitzStrathdee Eleanor MLA Board Member 471-7296Josh Novak Josh MLA Board Member [email protected] 471-4821French,Novak Matt, Heather MLA Board Member [email protected] or [email protected] 474-5927 795-3536

Madrid Merchants Assocation Business owner Indigo Gallery Shwaiko Jill MMA President 438-6202 438-6802 Business owner The Mine Shaft Tavern Lindsey Lori MMA Vice President 473-0743 Business ownerHackett Honore MMA Secretary 471-7605 Business owner The Great Madrid Gift EmporiumBonewell Melinda MMA Treasurer 474-0344 Business owner Cowgirl RedHanuman Amita MMA Advertising Committee 424-4467 Business owner Hanuman’s A World GalleryConley Conley MMA Advertising Committee 424-4467 2870 STATE HIGHWAY 14, Cerrillos, NM 87010 Business owner Conley Studio PotteryJohnson Johnson MMA Advertising Committee 471-1054

Madrid Water Cooperative PO BOX 237, Cerrillos, NM 87010Strathdee Gaven MWC Chairman 471-7296Reifman Marcia MWC Secretary [email protected] or [email protected] 471-2419

Volunteer Fire DepartmentZaxus Gwendolyn VFD Assistant Chief [email protected] 76 OCEAN VIEW DR, Cerrillos, NM 87010Undercuffler Phil VFD ChiefShepard Steve VFDCoulthard Stephanie VFDFarber LyndsayAnderson ClintCarl Dan

State LegislatorRhonda King Rhonda Legislator 832-4603

L:\09-0040 Madrid Mine Community Plan\Presentation\InDesign\Task 3 Report\Lists\2009-06 Madrid contact list_ full working list

STA

KEH

OLD

ER L

ISTI

NG

D-3

App

endi

x D

E-1

App

endi

x E


TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Golder Associates Inc.5200 Pasadena Avenue NE, Suite C

Albuquerque, NM 87113 USATel: (505) 821-3043 Fax: (505) 821-5273 www.golder.com

Golder Associates: Operations in Africa, Asia, Australasia, Europe, North America and South America

1.0 INTRODUCTIONThe Madrid Mining Landscape project, supported by the New Mexico Abandoned Mine Lands (AML)

program, is examining potential reclamation options to mitigate mining-related impacts including coal

wastes in and around the Village of Madrid. Golder Associates Inc. (Golder) has been working with

Dekker\Perich\Sabatini (DPS) and Karpoff and Associates (Karpoff) to engage the residents of Madrid in

a consensus planning process to develop a community-based plan to address these mining Impacts and

coal waste materials. Through a community outreach that included individual interviews and community

meetings with residents and stakeholders, the community planning process has focused on reclamation

projects that would address the degraded watershed and the community’s stormwater infrastructure.

During the planning team’s interactions with the residents, several people expressed concerns regarding

the potential for mining wastes to contaminate water resources, particularly those related to impacts from

elevated metal concentrations. Sampling and laboratory testing of gob materials and native soils had

been conducted previously by the AML Program in 2000. Samples were collected at various locations on

gob piles near Madrid, but their precise locations were not documented. The extractable metal

concentrations from coal waste samples using the Synthetic Precipitation Leach Procedure (SPLP) [EPA

method 1312] indicated a few metals with concentrations exceeding State water quality standards

With the stormwater focus of the Madrid Mining Landscape community plan, AML tasked Golder to

conduct additional sampling and analysis of the coal waste piles to expand on the understanding of their

character relative to the potential to impact surface water quality. Golder conducted this task with the

understanding that surface water quality data were unavailable for the Madrid watershed and there was

no indication of surface water quality degradation under current conditions.

2.0 METHODS Sampling fieldwork associated with this investigation took place on August 27, 2010. Sample locations

were selected to collect representative grab samples of the various coal waste materials and native soils

in the vicinity of Madrid. In all, ten waste rock and native soil samples were collected from the near

surface materials (0-6 inches). Representative samples (<3 inches size fraction) of the waste materials

Date: March 28, 2011 Project No.: 093-80021

To: Lloyd Moiola Company: Mining and Minerals Division, Abandoned Mine Lands Program

From: Doug Romig, CPSScc: Ken Romig, Dekker\Perich\Sabatini

Tim Karpoff, Karpoff and AssociatesRE: MADRID COAL WASTE CHARACTERIZATION

E-2

App

endi

x E


Mr. Lloyd Moiola March 28, 2011Abandoned Mine Lands Program 2 093-80021

Gob Samples SPLP TM Final.Docx

were collected in 1-gallon, air-tight bags, and submitted to Energy Laboratories, Inc. in Billings, Montana

for leachate extraction and metals analyses. The metals analyzed included Al, As, Ba, B, Cd, Cr, Co, Cu,

Fe, Pb, Mn, Hg, Mo, Ni, Se, Ag, U, V and Zn. At the laboratory, the samples were also analyzed for

saturated paste pH and electrical conductivity (EC) and grain size. Acid base accounting (ABA) was

analyzed for samples having a pH less than 5.

3.0 RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONSEight coal wastes samples were collected across the Madrid watershed, including slag (3), gob (4), and

gob mixed with other sediments (1). Two additional samples were collected from the upper six inches of

native soils. Figure 1 illustrates the distribution of the sample locations in the Madrid watershed. In

general, coal gob is present primarily in upslope positions while slag is the dominate coal waste in the

valley, particularly along the old railroad bed. Photos of sample locations and associated surface

conditions are provided in Attachment 1.

Table 1 provides the chemical and physical results for this investigation and laboratory reports are

provided in Attachment 2. Gob materials range from coarse- to fine-textured are non to very slightly saline

with pH ranging from extremely acid (pH=4.4) to slightly alkaline (pH=7.4). Slag materials are also non-

to very slightly saline very strongly acid (pH=4.7) to slightly alkaline (pH=7.6) and range from coarse- to

moderately fine-textured. Native soils are moderately fine-textured and non saline with neutral to slightly

alkaline pH values. Two samples had slightly negative ABA values based on pyritic and residual sulfur

content and thus could locally generate acidic soil conditions. Relative to sample analyses from 2000, the

2010 coal waste materials are generally more alkaline, less saline and have lower ABA values.

Metal concentrations in SPLP extracts were compared to the New Mexico Water Quality Control

Commission standards for groundwater, irrigation and livestock (Table 2). Groundwater and irrigation

standards were used as a benchmark for metals that are not regulated under the livestock standards.

Metal concentrations of SPLP extracts showed gob and native soil samples with generally elevated

aluminum concentrations relative to livestock surface water quality standards (Table 2). Extractable iron

concentrations in the majority of samples, including native soils, were elevated relative to groundwater

standards. For both iron and aluminum concentrations in the native soil samples had the highest

extractable concentrations. Additionally, one native soil sample had elevated extractable boron. A few

samples collected in 2000 had similar extractable boron, iron and aluminum concentrations as well as

elevated extractable concentrations of manganese and barium relative to groundwater standards. In

general, the 2010 samples with low pH and high EC, had low extractable metal concentrations.

The SPLP results presented here are qualified because there is uncertainty whether they accurately

predict pore water concentrations and are indicative of potential surface water quality. While the SPLP

method was designed to mimic the action of slightly acidic rainfall (pH 5) periodically leaching through

soil, it is difficult to predict the actual mobility of constituents from the results. Further, there are no

E-3

App

endi

x E


Mr. Lloyd Moiola March 28, 2011Abandoned Mine Lands Program 3 093-80021

Gob Samples SPLP TM Final.Docx

specific regulatory criteria that dictate the interpretation of SPLP results relative to potential water quality

impacts. That said, comparing the SPLP directly to water quality limits has been found to be conservative

in most situations.

In summary, native soils have elevated extractable metal concentrations in SPLP extracts suggesting that

surface waters in the Madrid watershed may naturally have higher concentrations of certain metals

compared to water quality standards. Extractable metals concentrations from coal wastes were generally

lower compared to those from native soils, thus water quality impacts from coal wastes are expected to

be less than from undisturbed soils. Further, low pH and high EC coal wastes (pH < 3.5; EC > 4.0) were

not observed, though a few samples from previous sampling were acidic and had high EC values. This

suggests low pH materials are not widespread and probably have limited influence to surface water

quality. Lastly, the slightly negative ABA values of some materials are not expected to have impacts to

water quality as these conditions do not appear to be widespread. The small amounts of acidity in some

of the coal wastes is likely neutralized by the calcareous native soils within the watershed.

Attachments

Figure 1

Tables 1 and 2

Attachment 1 Photo Log

Attachment 2 Energy Laboratory Results

E-4

App

endi

x E


Mad

rid’s

Min

ing

Land

scap

e / M

adrid

, NM

/ 4.

25.1

1

! (

! (! (

! (

! (! (

! (

! (

! (

! (

MG

P-10

MG

P-1

MG

P-2

MG

P-3

MG

P-6

MG

P-4

MG

P-5

MG

P-7

MG

P-8

MG

P-9

Coa

l Was

teSa

mpl

e Lo

catio

ns

DPS

Com

mun

ity P

lann

ing

AM

LM

adrid

PROJ

ECT

Tu

cso

n, A

rizo

na

TITL

E

Map

: L:\S

ite\M

adrid

\Map

s\F

ield

wor

k\C

oalW

aste

Sam

ples

.mxd

| M

odifi

ed: 3

/1/2

011

10:4

5:25

AM

| P

lotte

d: 3

/1/2

011

11:4

1:38

AM

by

MM

agui

re

REF

EREN

CES

NO

TES

Pro

ject

ion:

NA

D 1

983

UTM

Zon

e 13

NPR

OJE

CT

No. 09

3-80

021³

FIG

UR

E 1

01,

000

2,00

050

0

FEE

T

LEG

END

! (Sa

mpl

e P

oint

Gob

Pile

1:10

,000

SC

ALE

COA

L W

AST

E CH

ARA

CTE

RIZA

TIO

N

E-5

App

endi

x E

E-7

App

endi

x E


Mar

ch 2

011

Tabl

e 1

- Mad

rid G

ob T

able

s.xl

sx

ECpH

Sand

Silt

Cla

yN

PAP

ABP

Tota

l Su

lfur

H2O

So

lubl

e Su

lfate

s

Sulfa

te

Sulfu

rPy

ritic

Sulfu

rR

esid

ual

Sulfu

r

(dS/

m)

s.u.

MG

P-1

Sla

g0.

467.

677

167

SL

----

----

----

----

MG

P-2

Gob

0.47

7.4

857

8LS

--

----

----

----

--M

GP

-3N

ativ

e S

oil

0.73

7.6

2936

35C

L --

----

----

----

--M

GP

-4G

ob2.

416.

811

4445

SiC

--

----

----

----

--M

GP

-5G

ob2.

575.

325

4035

CL

----

----

----

----

MG

P-6

Gob

/Sed

imen

t1.

457.

149

2526

SC

L --

----

----

----

--M

GP

-7S

lag

0.47

7.7

8213

5LS

--

----

----

----

--M

GP

-8S

lag

2.2

4.7

3532

33C

L 6

8-3

0.29

0.02

< 0.

01

0.03

0.24

MG

P-9

Nat

ive

Soi

l0.

356.

939

2635

CL

----

----

----

----

MG

P-1

0G

ob2.

364.

448

2626

SC

L 3

8-5

0.46

0.2

< 0.

01

0.13

0.12

1E

C

oal W

aste

2.59

6--

----

--11

----

0.12

----

----

2S

B2

C

oal W

aste

2.22

4.2

----

----

6--

--0.

23--

----

-- 2

MR

DB

C

oal W

aste

2.4

3.9

----

----

44

-11.

35--

1.22

0.03

0.1

2S

B1

Coa

l Was

te2.

717

----

----

20--

--0.

52--

----

-- 2

NB

C

oal W

aste

9.37

2.2

----

----

020

-20

1.84

--1.

20.

090.

56 2

NR

D

Coa

l Was

te2.

625.

6--

----

--6

----

0.22

----

----

2E

B

Coa

l Was

te1.

883.

4--

----

--0

----

0.14

----

----

2M

B

Coa

l Was

te2.

224.

3--

----

--3

22-1

92.

25--

1.56

0.12

0.57

Not

es:

dS/m

- de

ciS

iem

ens

per m

eter

; t/k

t = to

ns p

er k

iloto

n; s

.u. =

sta

ndar

d un

its1

S =

san

d or

san

dy, L

= lo

am o

r loa

my,

Si =

silt

or s

ilty;

C =

cla

y or

cla

yey

-- n

ot m

easu

red

2000

Sam

ples

(t/kt

)(%

)(%

)

Tabl

e 1:

Phy

sica

l and

Che

mic

al p

rope

rtie

s of

Coa

l Was

te a

nd N

ativ

e So

ils in

Mad

rid

Sam

ple

IDM

ater

ial T

ype

Text

ure1

2010

Sam

ples

E-8

App

endi

x E


Mad

rid’s

Min

ing

Land

scap

e / M

adrid

, NM

/ 4.

25.1

1

March 2011 1 093-80021

Table 2 - Madrid Gob Tables.xlsx

Sample ID Material Type Al As Ba B Cd Cl Cr Co Cu Fe Pb Mn Hg Mo Ni Se Ag U V Zn

Groundwater 5.0i 0.1 1.0 0.75i 0.01 250d 0.05 0.05i 1.0d 1.0d 0.05 0.2d 0.002 1.0i 0.2i 0.05 0.05 0.03 10.0d

Livestock 5.0 0.2 5.0 0.05 0.1 1.0 0.50 0.10 0.01 0.050 0.100 25.0Irrigation 5 0.1 0.75 0.1 0.5 0.2 5.0 0.1 0.13 0.1 2

MGP-1 Slag 2.9 < 0.005 < 0.1 < 0.2 < 0.001 < 1 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 1.42 0.004 0.05 < 0.0001 < 0.005 < 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.01 < 0.0005 < 0.1 0.01MGP-2 Gob 9.3 < 0.005 0.1 0.3 < 0.001 < 1 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 2.83 0.01 0.08 < 0.0001 < 0.005 < 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.01 < 0.0005 < 0.1 0.01MGP-3 Native Soil 6.9 < 0.005 < 0.1 0.4 < 0.001 < 1 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 3.54 0.005 0.05 < 0.0001 < 0.005 < 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.01 < 0.0005 < 0.1 0.03MGP-4 Gob 13.7 < 0.005 < 0.1 < 0.3 < 0.001 < 1 0.01 < 0.01 0.01 4.84 0.011 0.04 < 0.0001 < 0.005 < 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.01 < 0.0005 < 0.1 < 0.01 MGP-5 Gob < 0.1 < 0.005 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.001 < 1 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.03 < 0.002 0.03 < 0.0001 < 0.005 < 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.01 < 0.0005 < 0.1 < 0.01 MGP-6 Gob/Sediment 6.1 < 0.005 < 0.1 0.3 < 0.001 < 1 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 3.59 0.006 0.04 < 0.0001 < 0.005 < 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.01 < 0.0005 < 0.1 0.03MGP-7 Slag 2.5 < 0.005 < 0.1 < 0.2 < 0.001 < 1 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 1.27 0.007 0.03 < 0.0001 < 0.005 < 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.01 < 0.0005 < 0.1 0.02MGP-8 Slag < 0.1 < 0.005 < 0.1 < 0.2 < 0.001 < 1 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.03 < 0.002 < 0.01 < 0.0001 < 0.005 < 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.01 < 0.0005 < 0.1 < 0.01 MGP-9 Native Soil 25.7 < 0.005 0.1 2.5 < 0.001 < 1 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 13 0.011 0.11 < 0.0001 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.01 < 0.0005 < 0.1 0.08MGP-10 Gob < 0.1 < 0.005 < 0.1 0.3 < 0.001 < 1 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.03 < 0.002 0.03 < 0.0001 < 0.005 < 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.01 < 0.0005 < 0.1 < 0.01

1E Coal Waste 0.37 0.007 0.38 0.16 <0.004 -- <0.01 <0.005 0.02 0.13 <0.05 0.014 <0.0002 <0.01 <0.01 <0.1 <0.01 <0.3 <0.01 0.095 2SB2 Coal Waste <0.05 <0.005 0.4 0.15 <0.004 -- <0.01 <0.005 0.01 0.04 <0.05 0.188 <0.0002 <0.01 <0.01 <0.1 <0.01 <0.3 <0.01 0.16 2MRDB Coal Waste 0.27 <0.005 0.1 0.16 <0.004 -- <0.01 0.005 0.01 <0.02 <0.05 0.58 <0.0002 <0.01 <0.01 <0.1 <0.01 <0.3 <0.01 0.157 2SB1 Coal Waste 0.27 0.008 0.27 0.2 <0.004 -- <0.01 <0.005 <0.01 0.16 <0.05 <0.005 <0.0002 <0.01 <0.01 <0.1 <0.01 <0.3 <0.01 0.033 2NB Coal Waste 14 0.045 0.12 0.58 <0.004 -- <0.01 <0.005 0.04 0.75 <0.05 0.366 <0.0002 <0.01 0.01 <0.1 <0.01 <0.3 <0.01 0.687 2NRD Coal Waste 0.46 0.012 0.3 0.17 <0.004 -- <0.01 <0.005 0.02 0.2 <0.05 0.056 <0.0002 <0.01 <0.01 <0.1 <0.01 <0.3 <0.01 0.104 2EB Coal Waste 1 0.008 3 1.15 <0.004 -- <0.01 <0.005 0.02 1.83 <0.05 0.14 <0.0002 0.04 <0.01 <0.1 <0.01 <0.3 <0.01 1.44 2MB Coal Waste 0.47 <0005 0.11 0.13 <0.004 -- <0.01 0.006 0.01 0.23 <0.05 0.35 <0.0002 <0.01 0.02 <0.1 <0.01 <0.3 <0.01 0.17Notes: - not measuredShaded values are above the indicated standard.NM WQCC = New Mexico Water Quality Control Commission (20.6.4 and 20.6.6 New Mexico Administrative Code)* - all in mg /L (milligrams per liter) unless noted; NMAC 20.6.2.3103 (groundwater) and 20.6.4.900 (surface water) i = irrigation; d = domestic water

2000 Samples

2010 Samples

NM WQCC Standard*

Table 2: Extractable Metal Concentrations from the Synthetic Precipitation Leach Procedure - Madrid Coal Waste Samples

MET

AL

CON

CEN

TRAT

ION

S TA

BLE

E-9

App

endi

x E

E-11

App

endi

x E


Mar

ch 2

011

109

3-80

021

Pho

to L

og.D

ocx

Phot

o Lo

g: M

adrid

Coa

l Was

te C

hara

cter

izat

ion

PHO

TO 1

Sam

ple

Loca

tion

MG

P-1

PHO

TO 2

Slag

Sur

face

, MG

P-1

PHO

TO 3

Sam

ple

Loca

tion

MG

P-2

PHO

TO 4

Gob

Sur

face

, MG

P-2

E-12

App

endi

x E


Mar

ch 2

011

209

3-80

021

Pho

to L

og.D

ocx

PHO

TO 5

Sam

ple

Loca

tion

MG

P-3

PHO

TO 6

Sam

ple

Loca

tion

MG

P-9

PHO

TO 7

Sam

ple

Loca

tion

MG

P-4

PHO

TO 8

Gob

Sur

face

, MG

P-4

E-13

App

endi

x E


Mar

ch 2

011

309

3-80

021

Pho

to L

og.D

ocx

PHO

TO 9

Sam

ple

Loca

tion

MG

P-5

PHO

TO 1

0G

ob S

urfa

ce, M

GP-

5

PHO

TO 1

1Sa

mpl

e Lo

catio

n M

GP-

6PH

OTO

12

Gob

-Sed

imen

t Sur

face

, MG

P-6

E-14

App

endi

x E


Mar

ch 2

011

409

3-80

021

Pho

to L

og.D

ocx

PHO

TO 1

3Sa

mpl

e Lo

catio

n M

GP-

7PH

OTO

14

Slag

Sur

face

, MG

P-7

PHO

TO 1

5Sa

mpl

e Lo

catio

n M

GP-

8PH

OTO

16

Slag

Sur

face

, MG

P-8

E-15

App

endi

x E


Mar

ch 2

011

509

3-80

021

Pho

to L

og.D

ocx

PHO

TO 1

7Sa

mpl

e Lo

catio

n M

GP-

10PH

OTO

18

Gob

Sur

face

, MG

P-10

E-16

App

endi

x E


S, H

NO

3

Extr

%

S, H

CL

Extr

%

S, H

2O

Extr

S, T

ota

lA

cid/B

ase

Pote

nti

al

Aci

d

Pote

ntia

l

Sam

ple

ID

Pro

ject:

Mad

rid G

op P

iles

09

3-8

00

21

.00

02

Cli

en

t:G

old

er A

ssoci

ates

Inc

Wo

rk

ord

er:

B1

00

92

71

3

Rep

ort

Date

:1

1/0

2/1

0

LA

BO

RA

TO

RY

AN

AL

YT

ICA

L R

EP

OR

T

Date

Receiv

ed

:0

9/2

9/1

0

San

dS

ilt

Cla

yT

extu

repH

, S

at

Pas

te

Cli

ent

Sam

ple

ID

Cond_

Pas

te

Neu

t

Pote

nti

al

Res

ult

sR

esu

lts

Res

ult

sR

esu

lts

Res

ult

sR

esu

lts

Res

ult

s

%%

%s_

u_

mm

hos/

cmt/

kt

An

aly

sis

An

aly

sis

An

aly

sis

An

aly

sis

Un

its

Un

its

Un

its

Un

its

Res

ult

s

t/k

t

Res

ult

s

t/k

t

Res

ult

s

%

Res

ult

s

%

Res

ult

sR

esu

lts

77

B10092713-0

01

16

7S

L7.6

00.4

6M

GP

-1

85

B10092713-0

02

78

LS

7.4

00.4

7M

GP

-2

29

B10092713-0

03

36

35

CL

7.6

00.7

3M

GP

-3

11

B10092713-0

04

44

45

SiC

6.8

02.4

1M

GP

-4

25

B10092713-0

05

40

35

CL

5.3

02.5

7M

GP

-5

49

B10092713-0

06

25

26

SC

L7.1

01.4

5M

GP

-6

82

B10092713-0

07

13

5LS

7.7

00.4

7M

GP

-7

35

B10092713-0

08

32

33

CL

4.7

02.2

06

MG

P-8

8-3

0.2

90.0

2<

0.0

10.0

3

39

B10092713-0

09

26

35

CL

6.9

00.3

5M

GP

-9

48

B10092713-0

10

26

26

SC

L4.4

02.3

63

MG

P-1

08

-50.4

60.2

0<

0.0

10.1

3

Pag

e 13

of 4

4

E-17

App

endi

x E


Mn-S

PL

P

mg

/L

Hg-S

PL

P

mg/L

Fe-

SP

LP

Cu

-SP

LP

Cr-

SP

LP

Co-S

PL

P

Sam

ple

ID

Pro

ject:

Mad

rid G

op P

iles

09

3-8

00

21

.00

02

Cli

en

t:G

old

er A

ssoci

ates

Inc

Wo

rk

ord

er:

B1

00

92

71

3

Rep

ort

Date

:1

1/0

2/1

0

LA

BO

RA

TO

RY

AN

AL

YT

ICA

L R

EP

OR

T

Date

Receiv

ed

:0

9/2

9/1

0

S, R

esid

ual

Ag-S

PL

PA

l-S

PL

PA

s-S

PL

PB

a-S

PL

P

Cli

ent

Sam

ple

ID

B-S

PL

PC

d-S

PL

P

Res

ult

sR

esu

lts

Res

ult

sR

esu

lts

Res

ult

sR

esu

lts

Res

ult

s

%m

g/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

An

aly

sis

An

aly

sis

An

aly

sis

An

aly

sis

Un

its

Un

its

Un

its

Un

its

Res

ult

s

mg/L

Res

ult

s

mg

/L

Res

ult

s

mg/L

Res

ult

s

mg/L

Res

ult

sR

esu

lts

B10092713-0

01

< 0

.01

2.9

< 0

.005

< 0

.1<

0.2

< 0

.001

MG

P-1

< 0

.01

< 0

.01

< 0

.01

1.4

2<

0.0

001

0.0

5

B10092713-0

02

< 0

.01

9.3

< 0

.005

0.1

0.3

< 0

.001

MG

P-2

< 0

.01

< 0

.01

< 0

.01

2.8

3<

0.0

001

0.0

8

B10092713-0

03

< 0

.01

6.9

< 0

.005

< 0

.10.4

< 0

.001

MG

P-3

< 0

.01

< 0

.01

< 0

.01

3.5

4<

0.0

001

0.0

5

B10092713-0

04

< 0

.01

13.7

< 0

.005

< 0

.1<

0.3

< 0

.001

MG

P-4

< 0

.01

0.0

10.0

14.8

4<

0.0

001

0.0

4

B10092713-0

05

< 0

.01

< 0

.1<

0.0

05

< 0

.1<

0.1

< 0

.001

MG

P-5

< 0

.01

< 0

.01

< 0

.01

< 0

.03

< 0

.0001

0.0

3

B10092713-0

06

< 0

.01

6.1

< 0

.005

< 0

.10.3

< 0

.001

MG

P-6

< 0

.01

< 0

.01

< 0

.01

3.5

9<

0.0

001

0.0

4

B10092713-0

07

< 0

.01

2.5

< 0

.005

< 0

.1<

0.2

< 0

.001

MG

P-7

< 0

.01

< 0

.01

< 0

.01

1.2

7<

0.0

001

0.0

3

0.2

4B

10092713-0

08

< 0

.01

< 0

.1<

0.0

05

< 0

.1<

0.2

< 0

.001

MG

P-8

< 0

.01

< 0

.01

< 0

.01

< 0

.03

< 0

.0001

< 0

.01

B10092713-0

09

< 0

.01

25.7

< 0

.005

0.1

2.5

< 0

.001

MG

P-9

< 0

.01

0.0

1<

0.0

113.0

< 0

.0001

0.1

1

0.1

2B

10092713-0

10

< 0

.01

< 0

.1<

0.0

05

< 0

.10.3

< 0

.001

MG

P-1

0<

0.0

1<

0.0

1<

0.0

1<

0.0

3<

0.0

001

0.0

3

Pag

e 14

of 4

4

E-18

App

endi

x E


Cl-

SP

LP

Sam

ple

ID

Pro

ject:

Mad

rid G

op P

iles

09

3-8

00

21

.00

02

Cli

en

t:G

old

er A

ssoci

ates

Inc

Wo

rk

ord

er:

B1

00

92

71

3

Rep

ort

Date

:1

1/0

2/1

0

LA

BO

RA

TO

RY

AN

AL

YT

ICA

L R

EP

OR

T

Date

Receiv

ed

:0

9/2

9/1

0

Mo-S

PL

PN

i-S

PL

PP

b-S

PL

PS

e-S

PL

PU

Chem

ical

-

Cli

ent

Sam

ple

ID

V-S

PL

PZ

n-S

PL

P

Res

ult

sR

esu

lts

Res

ult

sR

esu

lts

Res

ult

sR

esu

lts

Res

ult

s

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

An

aly

sis

An

aly

sis

An

aly

sis

An

aly

sis

Un

its

Un

its

Un

its

Un

its

Res

ult

s

mg/L

< 0

.005

B10092713-0

01

< 0

.01

0.0

04

< 0

.005

< 0

.0005

< 0

.10.0

1M

GP

-1<

1

< 0

.005

B10092713-0

02

< 0

.01

0.0

10

< 0

.005

< 0

.0005

< 0

.10.0

1M

GP

-2<

1

< 0

.005

B10092713-0

03

< 0

.01

0.0

05

< 0

.005

< 0

.0005

< 0

.10.0

3M

GP

-3<

1

< 0

.005

B10092713-0

04

< 0

.01

0.0

11

< 0

.005

< 0

.0005

< 0

.1<

0.0

1M

GP

-4<

1

< 0

.005

B10092713-0

05

< 0

.01

< 0

.002

< 0

.005

< 0

.0005

< 0

.1<

0.0

1M

GP

-5<

1

< 0

.005

B10092713-0

06

< 0

.01

0.0

06

< 0

.005

< 0

.0005

< 0

.10.0

3M

GP

-6<

1

< 0

.005

B10092713-0

07

< 0

.01

0.0

07

< 0

.005

< 0

.0005

< 0

.10.0

2M

GP

-7<

1

< 0

.005

B10092713-0

08

< 0

.01

< 0

.002

< 0

.005

< 0

.0005

< 0

.1<

0.0

1M

GP

-8<

1

< 0

.005

B10092713-0

09

0.0

10.0

11

< 0

.005

< 0

.0005

< 0

.10.0

8M

GP

-9<

1

< 0

.005

B10092713-0

10

< 0

.01

< 0

.002

< 0

.005

< 0

.0005

< 0

.1<

0.0

1M

GP

-10

< 1

Pag

e 15

of 4

4

F-1

App

endi

x F


C:\Documents and Settings\Ken\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLK54\MM-2011-02-18-TK.doc

Meeting Minutes

Project No.: 09-0040.004 Project: Madrid Mining Landscape Date: February 18, 2011 Place: Sf County Administrative offices Attending: John Kretzmann, Nicole Friedt, Tim Karpoff, Ken Romig, Robert

Griego, Beth Mills, Colleen Baker, Arnold Valdez By: Ken Romig Copies To: Parties Present Issue Date: March 2, 2011 Discussion Items: 1. Ken & Tim presented a proposed agenda, which was agreed to by everyone:

a. Articulation by each party—the County, AML, URS and DPS—of their interests and/or goals for the implementation phase of the project;

b. General discussion on ideas for proceeding, particularly with regard to approaching the County Manager and following County processes.

2. Interests of County staff: a. Education of Commissioners re: operation and maintenance responsibilities for facilities to be constructed

in Madrid. b. The County’s financial obligations for O&M c. The need to follow County legal requirements and procedures d. Developing a strategy to move project ideas through the Technical Review Committee (TRT)

3. Interests of URS: a. Creating drainage alternatives that are maintainable from the County’s perspective. URS is developing two

alternatives each for sedimentation, flooding and channel restoration. 4. Interests of AML:

a. Building facilities that accord with community needs and AML priorities b. Working in partnership with the County.

5. Interests of DPS team: a. Maintaining focus on addressing high-priority community needs b. Continuing to build trust between the community, and County and AML. c. Definitions of future DPS role in the development of the improvments.

6. During the discussion, County staff expressed the concern that projects would face extensive and time-consuming permitting and regulatory requirements at the County level, particularly because there might be multiple, individual property modification applications submitted for County approval for each project. AML stated that it and/or its contractors that will act as an umbrella to the multiple landowners and will be primary applicant for improvements. This was a breakthrough in the discussion, and a relief to County staff.

7. County staff expressed their support—several times—for the approach AML and the DPS team have taken, even indicating that they have not been able to work as closely with the Madrid community as the team has on this project.

8. Another breakthrough occurred when the group focused on developing a “resolution of support” by the County, instead of asking the County to “adopt” the plan. This was regarded as expressing a more appropriate role for the County, a less formal relationship, and easier to get passed by the Commission.

9. There was considerable discussion about how and when to bring project ideas before the TRT for review. Usually the TRT focuses on technical reviews; however, because the plan will continue to be developed in stages, there will be a need for a conceptual review to assure that there is early communication with the TRT. Based on advice from the County staff at this meeting, the group decided on scheduling a “pre-application” meeting with the TRT, followed by the organization of a subset of the TRT to hear about projects in more detail from time to time. TRT and/or the sub-group will therefore have opportunities to comment on the plan for either action and/or revisions, as advice or direction to AML consultants pursuing County approvals. County staff will work with Ken to determine when it will be appropriate for him to present the project plans to the TRT and/or the follow-up sub-group.

10. The language of the resolution was considered, e.g.,

F-2

App

endi

x F


C:\Documents and Settings\Ken\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLK54\MM-2011-02-18-TK.doc

a. “The Commission directs County staff to work with AML to develop project alternatives that are in keeping with County standards;:

b. “The Commission directs staff to integrate community concerns into the development of project alternatives;”

c. (Not mentioned at the meeting is the solicitation of letters of support from Madrid civic groups—which may support the resolution of support from the BCC)

11. Discussion also included the process of URS’s work, including the development of an Ad Hoc work session made up of members of the TRT review committee that can collectively develop solutions with URS for consideration.

12. The County reiterated its interest in Madrid developing its own governance structure and would like to continue AML’s work in Madrid.

13. URS will be developing alternatives in April and May.

Action Items: Ken: Develop draft resolution for consideration, review, editing and comment for County Staff

This report is assumed to be a true and accurate account of this communication unless notice to the contrary is received within 10 calendar days of issue.

End of Minutes

F-3

App

endi

x F


SANTA FE COUNTY RESOLUTION 2011-XXA RESOLUTION

EXPRESSING SUPPORT FOR THE AML MADRID MINING LANDSCAPE COMMUNITY BASED PLAN

WHEREAS, Santa Fe County recognizes: That the legacy of coal mining in the village of Madrid has shaped of the landscape that contributes to the village’s sense of place and identity, and; WHEREAS, Historic coal mining practices and processing techniques have contributed to specific adverse environmental effects such as flooding, erosion and sedimentation, and; WHEREAS, the Abandoned Mine Land program has three priorities:

• Protection of health/safety and property from extreme danger of adverse effects of mineral mining and processing practices

• Protection of health and safety and general welfare from adverse effects of mineral mining and processing practices.

• Restoration of land and water resources and the environment previously degraded by the adverse effects of mineral mining and processing practices. (NMAML, 2010)

WHEREAS, The Abandoned Mine Land (AML) Program, a division of the New Mexico Energy and Minerals Department, has initiated, and funded a community-based planning process that has resulted in the identification of two projects that will improve the quality of life for Madrid residents, WHEREAS, The AML Program intends to design and construct improvements to the public and private properties affected by the adverse effect of past mining practices, WHEREAS, The AML program and its consultants will adhere to Federal, State and County ordinances, and regulations that oversee the review and approval of project reports, and construction documents.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE GOVERNING COUNTY OF SANTA FE COUNTY supports the community based planning effort and the quality of life projects articulated within the plan; and directs County departments, including but not limited to, Community Planning, Economic Development, Open Space and Trails, Public Works, Fire Department, Building and Development and Utilities, and associated staff to work with AML and their representatives to develop projects that further County goals and objectives.

PASSED, ADOPTED AND APPROVED