REPORT ON SUMMER

A PROJECT REPORT ON SUMMER INTERNSHIP PROGRAMME

Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for award of the degree of BACHELOR OF LAW (HONS) 5 YEARS

YEAR 2013-2018Submitted To: Submitted By:

Ms. AVINASH KAUR TARUN SHOKEEN ENROLLMENT NO. 20521503813 B.A LL.B. (5TH SEMESTER)

CHANDER PRABHU JAIN COLLEGE OF HIGHER STUDIES

SCHOOL OF LAW

DECLARATIONThis is to certify that this report entitled Summer Internship report which is submitted by me in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the award of degree B.A. LL.B(H) to GGSIP University, Dwarka, Delhi, comprises only my original work and due acknowledgement has been made in the text to all other material used.

DATE: 10th November 2015 Name of student: TARUN SHOKEEN APPROVED BY: Ms. AVINASH KAUR Enrollment no. 20521503813 (Assistant professor)CERTIFICATE

This is to certify that this report entitled Summer Internship Report which is submitted by TARUN SHOKEEN in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the award of degree B.A. LL.B (Hons) G.G.S.I.P. University, Dwarka, Delhi, is a record of the candidate own work carried out by him under my/our supervision. The matter embodied in this thesis is original and has not been submitted for the award of any other degree. Supervisor Ms. AVINASH KAUR (Assistant professor)ACKNOWLEDGEMENTThe most awaited moment of successful completion of an endeavor is always a result of persons involved implicitly or explicitly there in and itis impossible without the help and guidance of the people around us.

The successful completion of this report is the result of dedicated efforts put in by many people and this report would be incomplete without Giving due credit to them. This acknowledgment is the token of gratitude in recognition of their help in our endeavor. I sincerely thank to my supervisor Ms. AVINASH KAUR for providing useful guidance and constant motivation throughout the project.

I express a deep sense of gratitude to all persons who have helped me in various stages and I have consulted and referred on many occasions. Name of student TARUN SHOKEENINDEXS. No.TOPIC/ITEMS

PAGE NO.

1.

CERTIFICATE OF GAUR & ASSOCIATES 1

2.

3. 4.TIS HAZARI COURT & FAMILY COURTTRAINING

MEANING OF TRAINING IMPORTANCE OF TRAINING

BENEFITS OF INTERNSHIP 81315

5.CASE - 1CASE - 2CASE - 3CASE - 4 CASE - 5 CASE - 6

CASE - 7

CASE - 8

CASE - 9

CASE - 10

172125283032

34

35

36

37

6.MY EXPERIENCE IN LEGAL FIRM

39

REPORT ONSUMMER INTERNSHIP

PROGRAMME

2. INTRODUCTION - TIS HAZARI COURT The Tis Hazari Courts Building was inaugurated in 1958, though in the earlier days the Tis Hazari was the only court complex in the whole of the Delhi as the District Level Court Complex. But at present Tis Hazari Court only have their jurisdiction over Central Delhi, North Delhi, West Delhi. Courts having their jurisdiction upon other parts of Delhi have been gradually shifted to other court complexes which have come up in various parts of Delhi like in 2006 Rohini Court complex was established which has courts having jurisdiction over North-West Delhi and Outer Delhi.

The District Courts (from which both civil and criminal cases were transferred) branched out from the original Tis Hazari Courts are: District Courts at Patiala House (New Delhi District), Karkarduma (East Delhi District), Rohini (North West District), Dwarka (South West District) and Saket (South District). Saket Court Complex started functioning with effect from Saturday, 28 August 2010. The Work of Civil and Criminal cases relating to South Civil District and South East Police Districts earlier looked after at Patiala House Courts Complex is now taken up with effect from the functioning of the courts of the respective districts at the new court complex at Saket.

The Chief Metropolitan Magistrate [CMM] of entire Capital Region Delhi presides over its court in Tis Hazari Courts Complex. - FAMILY COURT

The need to establish the Family Courts was first emphasized by late Smt Durga Bai Deshmukh after her visit to China in the year 1953, where she had the opportunity to study the working of Family Courts. She discussed the subject with Honble Mr. Justice M.C. Chagla of Bombay High Court and also Honble Mr Justice P.B. Gajendragadkar, then the Judge, Bombay High Court. She also discussed the matter of setting up of the Family Courts with the then Prime Minister Pandit Jawahar Lal Nehru. Several women associations, welfare organizations and individuals also mounted pressure for setting-up of the Family Courts to provide a forum for speedy settlement of family relates disputes. The emphasis was on a non- adversarial method of resolving family disputes and promoting conciliation and securing speedy settlement of dispute relating to marriage and family affairs.

The Law Commission in its 59th report (1974) also recommended for setting-up of special courts where rules of procedure would be simpler. The Law Commission also emphasized that such courts may adopt and approach radical steps distinguished from the existing civil courts and that such courts should make reasonable efforts for settlement before commencement of the trial. In 1975, the Committee on the Status of Women recommended that all matters concerning the family be dealt with separately.

In 1984, the Family Courts Act was passed and it came into force on September 14, 1984. The objective was to take family and marital disputes away from the overcrowded intimidating and congested environment of traditional courts of law and bring them to congenial and sympathetic surroundings. The aim was conciliation between the estranged family members and not confrontation.

The Family Courts Act, 1984 could not be implemented in Delhi for a long period of 25 years due to different reasons. To implement the Family Courts Act, 1984, a committee headed by Honble Mr. Justice Vijender Jain (as his lordship then was) was constituted in the Delhi High Court in the year 2006. The work was commenced and continued with full devotion and sincerity. With the passage of time, the committee was guided by Honble Mr. Justice Badar Durrez Ahmad and Honble Mr. Justice Pradeep Nandrajog at different points of time. Finally Honble Mr. Justice A.P. Shah, the then Chief Justice of Delhi High Court constituted a committee in November 2008 comprising Honble Mr. Justice Pradeep Nandrajog, Honble Mr. Justice Muralidhar and Honble Mr. Justice Manmohan, Judges of Delhi High Court. It was due to the zeal, enthusiasm and hard-work of the committee that the first Family Court in Delhi was set-up at Dwarka District Court Complex on 15.05.2009

INTRODUCTION This summary is a brief description of my internship I did in the office of Legal Firm Gaur & Associates. I interned for a period of 8weeks which was quite a learning and new experience as I got to witness the practical application of laws which I studied in my books only.

For a law student internship plays a very extensive role as it makes a student familiar to legal atmosphere and helps him learn tactics of a good lawyer from early age. My sir was very busy lawyer with lot of cases in hand, this gave me an opportunity to grasp more and more in short period of two months.

My sir assigned me some quality work I was capable of doing and understanding. Since I have just completed two years of my course and have not studied all major legal subjects so it was a bit difficult for me to be aware of every law or act my sir researched on. So my work was only confined to tasks like drafting, finding cases, some research work, interacting with clients, organizing the files and documents, maintaining the books, accompanying clerk to various sections and attending court proceedings with my sir.My drafting work included drafting of legal notices, affidavits, wills and preparing synopsis of various cases, making list of dates of events. I was familiar with this kind of drafting work as we were taught some parts of drafting in the first year itself and also observing my sir helped me a lot. Plus the staff members were always there for help if I get confused or commit a mistake.

Very often I used to accompany the clerk when he went to file a case or getting a copy of order or judgment or for making any other inquiry. I used to attend courts proceedings of our cases with my sir on daily basis. It helped me getting to know the environment of the courtroom, the language of the judge, presence of mind of lawyers.My regular task was to maintain the masses of files that lie in my office and to check if their documents are complete and in order. It made my seniors work easy as everything was organized and in place. It also used to make me aware which cases are currently going on and which are on coming dates.

One of the most interesting tasks was communicating with the clients as I get to know people from different fields and different backgrounds. I used to interact with them first handedly if my sir was busy in some other work or with some otherclients. Sometimes it gets difficult because people get emotional while explaining their problem and its quite tough to handle such situations. My whole period of internship gave me an ample knowledge of legal subjects which is surely going to help me in future. I learnt some practical aspects of law during this period which is very essential for becoming a good lawyer.

MEANING OF TRAINING

Training is an organizedactivityaimed at imparting information or instructions to improve the recipient's performance or help to attain a required level of knowledge or skill. It is a learning process that involves the acquisition of knowledge, sharpment of skills, concepts, rules or changing of attitudes and behaviors to enhance the performance of person. Training is about the acquisition of knowledge, skills and abilities. Training is an attempt to improve the current or future performance of a person by increasing his ability to perform through learning IMPORTANCE OF TRAINING

Studying competitive is the key to sustainability. Training the students, keeping them motivated and up-to-date with latest technology is essential to achinving the goal. Our education system has always stressed on the importance of training. Traning can increase performance of the trainee and also elevate the image and social status. Traning brings direct benefits to student. It is tyranny that brings tremendous change in terms of knowledge, attitudes and behavior of the student. Depending upon the needs of various jobs the method of training is very important. The soul purpose of training is to build the necessary skills of the students and to create positive feelings among them. Traning is important is following ways:-

Optimum Utilization of Human Resources Training and Development helps in optimizing the utilization of human resource that further helps the employee to achieve the organizational goals as well as their individual goals.

Development of Human Resources Training and Development helps to provide an opportunity and broad structure for the development of human resources technical and behavioral skills in an organization. It also helps the employees in attaining personal growth.

Development of skills of employees Training and Development helps in increasing the job knowledge and skills of employees at each level. It helps to expand the horizons of human intellect and an overall personality of the employees.

Productivity Training and Development helps in increasing the productivity of the employees that helps theorganizationfurther to achieve its long-term goal.

Team spirit Training and Development helps in inculcating the sense of team work, team spirit, and inter-team collaborations. It helps in inculcating the zeal to learn within the employees.

Organization Culture Training and Development helps to develop and improve the organizational health culture and effectiveness. It helps in creating the learning culture within the organization. Organization Climate Training and Development helps building the positive perception and feeling about the organization. The employees get these feelings from leaders, subordinates, and peers.

BENEFITES OF INTERNSHIP

I have certainly enjoyed the benefits of training under the able guidance of my advocate MR. NAVEEN GAUR. Training has brought a better understanding and provided me with a better vision in the law world. I have experienced and learned procedure for various legal proceedings. One of the important benefits of internship is that it helped me to understand formal legal presentations of any case. A law student can experience many benefits of training which will further help in developing good image, personality, skills.

Training has made me more knowledgeable, better equipped and experienced in law field. Training has helped me in improving the performance. It enlarges the scope of law in my life. I got to know about my different law and sections and their applications as well. Training has helped me to know about the procedure which is being followed in our domestic law system. I have experienced the role and need of law and courts in life.

Training is the best method of an overall development of future lawyers. It increases motivation, efficiency in process, resulting in financial gain. It also increased the capacity to adopt new technologies and methods. It increased innovation in strategies and products.WORK PERFORMED DURING INTERNSHIPCases are given below:-CASE NO.1

IN THE COURT OF SH. KAMLESH KUMAR, LD, APJ, FAMILY COURT

Ankit Garg

v.

Priyanka Jain Petition No.

12864/2015This is a case of petition for divorce by mutual consent under Section 13(B), 13(1) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

Section- 13 (2) of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955Brief FactsThis petition filed by the petitioner no.1 (Ankit Garg) and petitioner no.2 (Priyanka Jain) Who got married at Delhi on 5/may/2013, according to the hindu rites and customs, they lived together as husband and wife till the 25/may/2013 and there has been no cohabitation after the 25/may/2013 out of the said wedlock no child was born. They have failed to stay together as husband and wife and have agreed to dissolve the marriage.

Under this petition that it has been decided between the parties that one time settlement amount/alimony of Rs. 16, 00,000 cash shall be payable by the first party to the second party at the time of signing of compromise cum - mutual settlement deed 04/April/2014.

That the parties to the present petition have resolved all their differences regarding Istridhan, Maintenance, Alimony etc. and nothing remains between the parties and the marriage was mutually agreed to be dissolved between the parties.

That after the grant of the first motion by the Honble Court, the parties to the present petition tried to resolve their differences but to no avail. There are thus no chances of the parties re - counseling their differences and lived together as a husband and wife therefore parties decided to dissolve their Marriage.

From the joint statement of the petitioners recorded on oath, it is evident that the petitioners have filed the present petition voluntarily without any undue influence from any quarter.The petition complies in the provision of Sec. 13 (B)(1) of the said Act.1st Motion- 31/May/20142nd Motion- 3/December/2014Personal Observation

When I was read out this case during my internship period, several points were read by me which are as follow. This petition was filed under The Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. Petition was filed by Ankit Garg (Respondent 1) and Priyanka Jain (Respondent 2) under Sec. 13(B) (Divorce by mutual consent) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

Parties marriage on 5/05/2013 according to the Hindu rites and rituals and lived together till 25/05/2013 as a husband and wife and there has been no cohabitation after 25/05/2013 and no child were born by this wedlock. They have failed to stay together as husband and wife and agreed to dissolve their marriage.

In the first motion of this petition that one time settlement amount/alimony of Rs. 16, 00,000 cash shall be payable by the first party to the second party at the time of signing of compromise cum- mutual settlement deed . After this parties have resolve their differences regarding alimony, Istridhan and maintenance. After first motion court give six months time period to the parties tried to resolve their all differences and living together as a husband and wife but there was no positive response comes in this time period.

In second (2nd) motion honble court gives final decision and both the parties were agreed to dissolve their marriage by the mutual consent.CASE NO.2

IN THE COURT OF SH. SUDHANSHU KAUSHIK,

State v. Sushil KumarCourt Room no. Case no.

206 245/14Mediation Cell

308

This is the case of Rash Driving or riding on a public and causing hurt and grievous hurt by act endangering life of personal safety and others under the Sections of Indian Penal Code, 1860.

Section 279, 337, 338 of Indian Penal Code, 1860.

Sec.279 Rash driving or riding on a public way.

Sec. 337 Causing hurt by act endangering life or personal safety of others

Sec. 338 Causing grievous hurt by act endangering life or personal safety of others.Brief Facts:

This is a case of accident; the brief facts are as that the parties are that injured persons met with an accident on 10/april/2014 in which Tara Chand (injured) received grievous injuries and Sheila (injured), Sonia (injured) and Sumit (injured) received simple injuries F.I.R. no. 245/14 U/S 279/337/338 IPC was registered at PS Punjabi Bagh.After the negotiations, both the parties have agreed to settle their dispute. The parties here to confirm and declare that they have voluntarily and out of their own will have arrived at this settlement agreement. It is an amicable solution for resolving their disputes and differences.

The parties have agreed to settle their entire disputes on the following terms

and conditions:

1. Accused Sushil Kumar and injured persons namely Tare Chand (jeeja

of accused), Shiela (sister of accused), Sonia (wife of accused) and Sumit (bhanja of accused) have agreed that being, family members they have settled their dispute and agreed to compound the offence U/S 337/ 338 of IPC.2. Both parties further agreed that they shall approach the concerned MM for compounding of criminal case pending vides FIR No. 245/14 U/S 279. 337/338 IPC PS Punjabi Bagh.

3. Accused also expressed his willingness to plead guilty for non compoundable offence u/s 279 IPC.

The above agreement has been entered into between the parties voluntarily,

without any pressure, coercion or duress. The parties have signed the agreement in token of having agreed the terms of settlement.

Personal ObservationWhen I read out this case during my internship period, several points were read by me which are as follow.

This is a case of accident. In this case four people was injured in accident namely Tara Chand received grievous injuries and Sheila, Sonia and Sumit received simple injuries. After that F.I.R. no. 245/14 under Section. 279/337/338 of IPC was registered at Punjabi Bagh Police Station against accused Sushil Kumar who drove vehicle at the time of accident.After the negotiations, both the parties have agreed to settle their dispute. The parties confirm and declare that they have voluntarily and out of their own will have arrived at this settlement agreement. It is an amicable solution for resolving their disputes and differences. Injured persons are relatives of accused person and being a family member they have agreed to settle their dispute and agreed to compound the offence of Section 337/338 of Indian Penal Code. Accused also expressed his willingness to plead guilty for non compoundable offence u/s 279 Indian Penal Code. Agreement has been entered into between the parties voluntarily, without any pressure. The parties have signed the agreement on the terms of settlement.

CASE NO. 3

IN THE COURT OF SMT. SHIVALI SHARMA, METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE

Anju Shekharan V.

Guna Shekharan

5/February/2015Brief Facts:

The present case under Sec. 12 of Domestic violence act 2005 and the same is filed by Smt. Anju Shekhran against her husband and in-laws, in the present petition she is claiming maintenance, residence for herself and her two minor children. Proceeding:

I was appeared along with petitioner Anju Shekhran and her counsel. The case is fixed for evidence of Mrs. Anju Shekhran but the opposite counsel took adjournment on the ground that case not prepared for the same and the Honble court adjourned the matter for 1/7/2015 and granted last opportunity for cross examination to M/s Anju Shekhran.Personal Observation

When I was reading this case during my internship period, several points were read by me which are as follows:In this case complainant was filed under Sec. 12 of Domestic Violence Act 2005. Petition filed by petitioner (Anju Shekhran) against respondent (Guna Shekhran and Her in -laws). Basic fact of this case is that husband (Guna Shekhran and her in-laws) hit his wife and harassed her.

Under this petition petitioner filed a petition under Sec. 12 of Domestic Violence Act and claimed for maintenance and residence for her and her two minor children.

On the date of hearing I appeared with Anju Shekhran and her counsel, case was fixed for evidence but at the same time opposite party took up an adjournment on the ground that case not prepared for the same and the Honble court adjourned the matter for 1/7/2015 and granted last opportunity for cross examination to M/s Anju ShekhranCASE NO. 4

IN THE COURT OF SH. KRISHNA KUMAR,

Tasleem @ pappuv.

The State (NCT Govt. of Delhi)

FACTS

This is a very interesting rape case which shows the presence of moral justice.

Facts of case-

In this case a lady filed a case against a man named Tasleem that he raped her.

It was told by the victim that while she was present at her house alone, one person namely Pappu on the plea of asking a screw driver entered inside her room and bolted the door and thereafter on the point of knife by thing out the same from the room, extended threat to her and forcible committed rape upon her. Thereafter extending threat to her as not to disclose incident to anyone, said Pappu left from the spot. She disclosed to her husband about the incident. In pursuance of the statement of the prosecutrix F.I.R. was registered at P.S. Nangloi.

Investigation was done by ASI Neena Devi and all the articles collected from the spot i.e. knife, petticoat and socks etc. were given for tests in concerned labs.

DECISION

All the reports were not in favor of prosecutrix but decision was given in favor of prosecutrix and accused was given punishment of 10 years under section 376 IPC.

This decision was completely given on the basis of corroborated statements of prosecution witness 1, 2 and 3 i.e. prosecutrix, husband of prosecutrix and FSL report expert.

Court didnt find any force on the said defence plea of false implication by the prosecutrix merely at the instance of her husband due to earlier quarrel on account of petty issue of Rs. 200/. as court was of the considered view that a woman in the tradition bound non-permissive society in India would be extremely reluctant even to admit any instance which is likely to reflect on her chastity and she was naturally conscious about the danger of being ostracized by the society and therefore court dont see any reason as to why the prosecutrix will go to the extent of going to depose regarding commission of rape upon her by the accused, in case accused actually have not committed rape upon her.

OBSERVATION

In this case I observed that court rely on the quality but not quantity of evidences and witnesses. In this case court just basically relied upon the statement of the victim.

CASE NO. 5

IN THE COURT OF SH. TARUN SEHRAWAT,

Date:-18.05.2015Rajinder Yadav & ors. Plaintiffs

v.

Mangal Singh & ors. DefendantsFACTS

Plaintiffs are the owner in possession of completely builds up old house situated in Abadi Area of Lal Dora of Anand Parbat, Delhi. That house was constructed about five decades ago by the father of the plaintiffs. Defendants demolished the entire existing structure on their plot and started unauthorized, illegal new construction in it even without getting a plan sanctioned from the competent authority.

Defendants during raising unauthorized construction, tried to remove the bricks from the wall of the house of plaintiffs existing adjacent to the plot of defendants.

OBSERVATIONSOn hearing of case plaintiff prayed to the Honble court in view of the above facts to pass a decree of permanent injunction in favor of plaintiffs.

Plaintiffs also filled an application under order 39 rules 1& 2 & with section 151 CPC, to pass an ex- parte ad interim injunction in favor of plaintiff.

Court granted relief to plaintiffs and stay orders are passed by court. After this, the case matter is to be heard on next dates by the court.

CASE NO. 6

IN THE COURT OF SH. VIJAY KUMAR DAHIYA,

Sudha Gupta

V.

State (NCT of Delhi)

This is petition under article 226 of constitution of India, for issuance of a writ/order in the nature of certiorari thereby quashing the FIR No 145/2010 registered at PS Raghubir Nagar.

DATE:-10.07.2015On this date we got the easiest case of our internship but it is an important thing to learn. This case is good example to explain compoundable and non- compoundable cases.

FACTS

In this case it was alleged by Smt. Sudha Gupta that she went with his son to visit their flats and when they entered the premises, she and her son were mercilessly beaten by the accused persons and one of the relative of Mahesh Chand gave a danda blow on the hand of the her due to which fracture in his little finger besides other injuries. It was further alleged by the petitioners that after some time two other relatives of Sudha came to spot and they were also beaten by Mahesh Chand.

After this incident, both the parties settled their disputes amicably without any fear, pressure or coercion from any corner and as such the joint petition was filed for quashing of the aforesaid FIR. After the settlement arrived at between the parties, petitioner did not wish to pursue the FIR and they did not have any objection in the FIR quashing.

DECISION

The FIR was quashed.

OBSERVATION

In this case judge observed very carefully and made it sure that there is no pressure on any party. Honorable judge asked from each and every petitioner whether he want quashing of FIR. Affidavits of all the petitioners were also taken.

CASE NO. 7

IN THE COURT OF SH. GAURAV SHARMA,Mr. Mohit Mathur .ComplainantVersus

1) M/s Hindustan Tubewells Accused no.1

2) Dalbir Singh Proprietor M/s Hindustan Tubewells Accused no.2

Complaint under section 138 of negotiable instruments act, 1881 (as amended) Read with section 420 of the Indian Penal Code.

The complainant had contacted accused no.2 proprietor of the accused no.1 for executing the work of re-development of tube well bore at the complainants residence. An advance payment for an amount of Rs.2,75,000 was made to accused no.2 for the execution of the desired work at the premises. The MOU cum receipt specifically stipulates that accused no.2 undertakes that in case he fails to carry out and completely execute the work on or before 31st Jan, 2015, He shall return the advance payment to him by the complainant and for which he accused no.2 on behalf of accused no.1 had issued and handed over to the complainant two post dated cheques accused no.2 failed to carry out and execute the same.

The cheques of the accused were returned unpaid by the complainants bank on 08.07.2015 with remarks Funds Insufficient

It is noteworthy that the said cheques on the pact of accused tantamount to cheating, defrauding and unlawful losses.

Next Date:

15.09.2015Case NO. 8

IN THE COURT OF SMT. VANDANA,

Ranbir Singh AppellantVersusState of NCT of Delhi Respondent

Application under section 482 of the code criminal procedure for exemption from filing certified copies of the annexure.

Brief Facts:

That the petitioner has filed the present criminal appeal under section 341 read with section 482 of the code of criminal procedure , seeking relief for setting aside with order dates 26.09.2014 and the proceedings initiated there upon , passed by the court of Ms. Sujata Kohli , additional session judge / special judge (NDPS) Tis Hazari , Delhi.

That the petitioner crave leave this Honble court to refer and rely upon the contents of the said appeal at the time of hearing of this application , as the same are not being reproduced here for the sake of brevity.

Appeal is pending before the Honble High Court of Delhi.CASE NO. 9

IN THE COURT OF SMT. KAMINI LAU

Neeta Chopra and ANR PetitionerVersusState Respondent

Application under section 482 of the code of criminal procedure seeking restoration of the above mentioned petition to its original number.

Brief Facts

That the above mentioned petition was pending before this Honble court and vide order dated 29.11.2014 the said petition was dismissed for non-prosecution by this Honble court and hence the present application.

Both the petitioners are senior citizens aged about 63 years and are permanent residents of Delhi. It is humbly submitted that they are falsely implicated in the present case by the investigating agencies at the behest of the complainant.

Next date

09.10.2015Case NO. 10

IN THE COURT OF SH. RP PANDEY, ADJStateVersusSurinder Bhatt

Brief Facts The witness Krishan Dagar had come to the house of his cousin brother Vishal about 10-15 days prior to the commencement of the said offence on 07.04.13 at about 11:30 after taking the meals at the flat of his cousin Vishal in Paschim Vihar, Kishan along with his friend Pardeep who lives in same flat on the first floor. We were walking in front of the said house after they had reached nearby their flat one Honda city car of silver color came from the back side and stopped nearby them.

When Krishan reached near the said car in the impression that they had stopped for some address query Kishan saw that one of the accused Pahuja was driving the said car. The accused Pahuja was driving the said car. The other accused sitting at the back seat fired from the pistol type weapon which was in his hand towards him and the bullet hit on his thigh and then he again fired upon him the other bullet injury which hit him on the right leg below knee and thereafter, the driver of the car left the place.

After 20 minutes the car again came back at this time the accused Charu had fired 3-4 rounds pointing towards Krishan and Pardeep but none of those bullets hit any of them. Thereafter they left the place.Charge

RP Pandey, additional sessions judge (O), Tis Hazari, Delhi do thereby charged Surinder Bhatt @Charu Son Sh. Ram Sagar, as under:

That on 07.04.13 on the night intervening 8.4.13 at about 12.00 midnight on road in front of H.N.O B-5/312 , sector II , Paschim Vihar within the jurisdiction of PS: Paschim Vihar, accused along with CO accused Ramesh and Satish in furtherance of common intention assaulted on the person of Krishnan Dagar and caused bullet injury on his person and also fired towards Pardeep with such intention or knowledge and under such circumstances that , if by that act had caused his death , that they all would have been guilty of murder and thereby committed an offence punishable under section 307/34 IPC.Section of IPC included in the case:

Section 307 attempt to murder:

Whoever does any act with such intention or knowledge and under such circumstances that, if he by that act caused death, he would be guilty of

Order , Shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to 10yrs and shall also be liable to fine ; and if hurt is caused to any person by such act , the offender shall be liable either to imprisonment for life, or to such punishment as in here in before mentioned.

Essentials

PART 1 a. Accused did some act

b. Such act was done with intentionPART 2 a. Accused did some act

b. Such act was done with knowledge or intention

c. Hurt was caused to the victim by the actPART 3 a. Accused did some act.

b. Intention or Knowledge

c. Hurt d. Accused when committed offence was under sentence of life

imprisonment

My Experience In a Legal FirmThis past summer, I spent a month in GAUR & ASSOCIATES Law firm, Civil and Criminal Law had always been one of the career ideas bouncing around my head. So, I decided to do internship in Civil as well as in Criminal Law.

I was assigned with various Civil and Criminal cases and researched legal propositions related to various types of agreements, contracts, petitions , rent control act, also with many criminal procedures and much more . I wrote up some cases in which I took part may u call it by reading or attending the cases personally. The projects I was involved in sometimes made my head spin. The best part of my experience was working with my Mr. Naveen Gaur (DIRECTOR) and Mr. Kaushlendra Singh (ASSISTANT . DIRECTOR) who seemed tohave solutions toall my problems and for proving the nice ideas to work upon. Simply put, I could not have done this work without the lots of help I received cheerfully from them. They even explained my how A LEGAL FIRM really works and what it basically deals with and most importantly what is the role of the law towards the society.The work environment at the FIRM was great and through this internship I ended up with way more than better research skills.39