target capture of dna from ffpe samples— recommendations for generating robust sequencing data
TRANSCRIPT
Kristina Giorda PhD, Staff Scientist
Target capture of DNA from FFPE samples—recommendations for generating robust sequencing data
1
Outline
• Review – Oncology molecular profiling and formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue– FFPE extraction and gDNA QC methods– Library preparation and target enrichment
• Experimental approach– Phase 1—Do FFPE extraction kits or QC methods vary?– Phase 2—Are QC methods predictive of library quality?– Phase 3—Can high quality capture libraries be made with FFPE samples?
2
Precision health and oncology• White House Precision Health Initiative mission statement
– To enable a new era of medicine through research, technology, and policies that empower patients, researchers, and providers to work together toward development of individualized care.
• National Cancer Institute defines precision medicine as– Discovering unique therapies that treat an individual’s cancer based on
the specific abnormalities of their tumor.
From www.cancer.gov
Mutation profiles may inform cancer treatment
Li T, Kung HJ, et al. (2013) Genotyping and genomic profiling of non-small-cell lung cancer: Implications for current and future therapies. J Clin Oncol, 31(8):1039–1049. 4
FFPE tumor tissue
• Preferred method for tissue preservation in clinical practice
• Routinely used for multiple analyses methods, including immunohistochemistry (IHC), in situ hybridization, and next generation sequencing
• Notorious for suboptimal DNA quantity and quality
• Sample quality evaluation is key to optimizing downstream processing
5
Variable DNA yield and quality from FFPE blocks
Arreaza G, Qiu P, et al. (2016) Pre-analytical considerations for successful next-generation sequencing (NGS): Challenges and opportunities for formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tumor tissue (FFPE) samples. Int J Mol Sci, 17(9):1579. 6
Outline
• Review – Oncology molecular profiling and FFPE tissue– FFPE extraction and gDNA QC methods– Library preparation and target enrichment
• Experimental approach– Phase 1—Do FFPE extraction kits or QC methods vary?– Phase 2—Are QC methods predictive of library quality?– Phase 3—Can high quality capture libraries be made with FFPE samples?
7
FFPE sample extraction methods
• Remove paraffin with QIAGEN Deparaffinization Solution
• FFPE extraction options– QIAamp® DNA FFPE Tissue Kit
(column-based; QIAGEN )– ReliaPrep™ FFPE gDNA Miniprep System
(column-based; Promega )– E.Z.N.A® FFPE DNA Kit
(column-based; Omega Bio-tek )– Mag-Bind® FFPE DNA Kit
(bead-based; Omega Bio-tek )
8
Sample
Removeparaffin
Lyse
Heat
Column-basedDNApurification
Bead-basedDNApurification
FFPE QC methods—TapeStation® Instrument (Agilent)
http://www.agilent.com/cs/library/applications/5991-5258EN.pdf9
DNAIntegrityNumber(DIN)
FFPE QC methods—hgDNA Quantification and QC Kit (KAPA)
https://www.kapabiosystems.com/assets/KAPA_hgDNA_Quantification_and_QC_Kit_TDS.pdf 10
Outline
• Review – Oncology molecular profiling and FFPE tissue– FFPE extraction and gDNA QC methods– Library preparation and target enrichment
• Experimental approach– Phase 1—Do FFPE extraction kits or QC methods vary?– Phase 2—Are QC methods predictive of library quality?– Phase 3—Can high quality capture libraries be made with FFPE samples?
11
Library construction
12
Fragmentation
EndrepairandA-tailing
Adapterligation
Beadcleanup
Libraryamplification
Beadcleanup
• IDT xGen® Lockdown® Probes– Individually synthesized– Individual QC for every probe– Individually normalized– Pooled
NGS target capture enrichment
13
Target enrichment via hybridization
14
xGen® Lockdown® Probes are individually synthesized and QCed
Each xGen® Lockdown® Probe receives an individual ESI-MS analysis15
Failed Remade
Fulllength
Truncated
Fulllength
Outline
• Review – Oncology molecular profiling and FFPE tissue– FFPE extraction and gDNA QC methods– Library preparation and target enrichment
• Experimental approach– Phase 1—Do FFPE extraction kits or QC methods vary?– Phase 2—Are QC methods predictive of library quality?– Phase 3—Can high quality capture libraries be made with FFPE samples?
16
Extraction kit comparison
• Do FFPE extraction kits or QC methods vary?• DNA was isolated from 5 FFPE blocks
– 10 µm scrolls for each extraction– 4 different kits:
• QIAamp® DNA FFPE Tissue Kit (column-based; QIAGEN )
• ReliaPrep™ FFPE gDNA Miniprep System (column-based; Promega )• E.Z.N.A® FFPE DNA Kit
(column-based; Omega Bio-tek )• Mag-Bind® FFPE DNA Kit
(bead-based; Omega Bio-tek )– Samples were assessed with Qubit® dsDNA BR Assay (Thermo Fisher), TapeStation®
instrument (Agilent), and the hgDNA Quantification and QC Kit (Kapa Biosystems)
17
Extraction and purification detailsQIAGEN Promega Omega-column Omega-beads
Deparaffinization 160 µL/56 oC/3 min
Lysis, Proteinase K 56oC/1 hr 56oC/1 hr 55oC/3 hr 55oC/3 hr(3–5 hr)
Reverse crosslinking 90oC/60 min 80oC/60 min 90oC/30 min (10–30 min)
90oC/45 min (45–60 min)
RNase A 200 µg/RT/2 min
40 µg/RT/5 min
200 µg/RT/5 min
100 µg/RT/5 min
DNA cleanup Column Beads
Elution 60 µL
18Parenthesesshowrecommendedranges
FFPE fixation impacts DNA quality
19
DNAyieldandDINwereconsistentforeachFFPEblock
QC methods are consistent
20
SampleDINandqualityscoreswereconsistentforeachblock
Qual
ity s
core
(Q12
9/Q4
1)
• Do FFPE extraction kits or QC methods vary?– FFPE fixation impacts DNA quality– DNA yield and QC methods were consistent for each FFPE block
• Are QC methods predictive of target capture performance?– Library construction modifications for FFPE samples
• Fragmentation optimization• Pre-capture PCR amplification
– Effect of sample quality on library quality using fixed 10 ng input into library construction
Extraction kit comparison
21
Library modifications
22
FFPEsampleswereshearedwith200bp conditionstoachieve300bp inserts
Post-shearingFragmentation
EndrepairandA-tailing
Adapterligation
Beadcleanup
Libraryamplification
Beadcleanup
Library modifications
23
Input 10 ng of library
gDNA 11 cycles
FFPE 12 cycles
Pre-capturePCRamplification:
Input 10 ng of library
Adapter stock 4 µM
Adapter:insert(300 bp)
400:1
Adapterconcentrationused:Fragmentation
EndrepairandA-tailing
Adapterligation
Beadcleanup
Libraryamplification
Beadcleanup
Target capture enrichment
• xGen® Acute Myeloid Leukemia Cancer Panel– Target regions within 260 genes (1.2 Mb target area)
• 500 ng barcoded library per capture
https://www.idtdna.com/pages/products/nextgen/target-capture/xgen-lockdown-panels/xgen-aml-cancer-panel 24
Maximum mean coverage
25
Effect of sample quality on maximum mean coverage
26
QCresultspredictmaximummeancoverage
Maxm
eancoverage(reads)
Qualityscore(Q129/Q41) DIN
• Do FFPE extraction kits or QC methods vary?– FFPE fixation impacts DNA quality– DNA yield and QC methods were consistent for each FFPE block
• Are QC methods predictive of target capture performance?– Library construction modifications for FFPE samples
• Increase shearing• Add pre-capture PCR cycles
– QC methods predict target capture performance• Can high quality capture libraries be made with FFPE samples?
– A mass titration was done with high quality, low quality, and control DNA to determine the impact of quality on maximum mean coverage
Quality comparison
27
Library modifications
28
Input 1 ng 5 ng 10 ng 25 ng 50 ng 100 ng
gDNA 14 12 11 8 7 6
FFPE 16 14 12 9 8 7
Pre-capturePCRamplificationcycles:
Input 1 ng 5 ng 10 ng 25 ng 50 ng 100 ng
Adapter stock 400 nM 2 µM 4 µM 10 µM 20 µM 20 µM
Adapter:insert(300 bp)
400:1 400:1 400:1 400:1 400:1 200:1
Adapterconcentrationsused:
Achievable coverage depth based on sample quality and quantity
29
AdjustinginputmassintolibraryconstructioncancompensateforDNAquality
Sample name Q129/41 DIN
gDNA (control) 1.4 9.35
High quality FFPE > 0.4 > 3.5
Low quality FFPE < 0.2 < 2.5
Maxm
eancoverage(reads)
Achievable coverage depth based on sample quality and quantity
30
Maxm
eancoveragewith
50
nginpu
t(reads)
Minim
uminpu
tfor
meancoverage=500
X(ng)
AdjustinginputmassintolibraryconstructioncancompensateforDNAquality
• Quality and yield of DNA extracted from FFPE samples are likely influenced by preservation and fixation
• QC methods predict final library complexity• Increased shearing and added pre-capture PCR cycles were required for
FFPE samples• It is important to perform QC on FFPE DNA to determine the minimum
input required for deep coverage• Sequencing depth is dependent on DNA quality and input amount
FFPE recommendations
31
Conclusions
• xGen® Lockdown® Probes are compatible with varying quantity and quality starting material, allowing analysis of clinically relevant samples
• Modified library preparation methods enable deep coverage facilitating accurate detection of mutations with 500X median target coverage
32
“Best tech support ever,
@idtdna!”
Questions?
TALK TO A PERSON.Lauren SakowskiOur experts are available for consultation.
“The people at @idtdna are
awesome. A+ for customer service.”
Nikolai Braun
Contact us by web chat, email, or phone.Find local contact details at: www.idtdna.com
Or email: [email protected]
THANK YOU!We will email you the webinar recording and slides next week.