taitz v ruemmler (appeal - d.c. cir.) - scheduling order

Upload: jack-ryan

Post on 06-Apr-2018

220 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/3/2019 TAITZ v RUEMMLER (APPEAL - D.C. CIR.) - Scheduling Order

    1/6

    !f,niteh #tutex 6.surt sf AyypxlxFOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUITNo. 11 -5306 September Term ZA11

    1:11 -cv-01421 -RCLFiled On: December 9,2011 us46lstl

    Orly Taitz,Appellant

    V.

    Kathy Ruemmler, in her capacity as theWhite House counsel and custodian ofrecords,Appellee

    ORDERThe notice of appeal was filed on October 31,2011, and docketed in this courton November 2,2011.11 is, on the court's own motion,ORDERED that appellant submit the documents listed below by the dates

    indicated.Certificate as to Parties, Rulings, andRelated CasesDocketing Statement FormEntry of Appearance FormProcedural motiofls, if anyStatement of lntent to Utilize DeferredJoint AppendixStatement of lssues to be RaisedTranscript Status ReportUnderlying Decision from Which Appealor Petition ArisesDispositive Motions, if any (Original and 4copies)

    January 9, 2012January 9, 2012January 9, 2012January 9, 2012January g,ZA,f,.January 9, 2012January 9, 2012January 9, 2012

    January 23,2012

  • 8/3/2019 TAITZ v RUEMMLER (APPEAL - D.C. CIR.) - Scheduling Order

    2/6

    !f,niteb fitxtex ffsurt sf A yypulxFOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUITNo . 11 -5306 September Term 2011

    A request for appointment of counsel does not relieve appellant of the obligationto file responses to any motion filed by appellee or to comply with any order issujO bythe court, including a briefing schedule. Failure by appellant-to responO to a dispositivemotion or comply with any order of the court, including this order, will result in dismissalof the case for lack of prosecution. See D.C. Cir. Rute SB.It is

    FURTHER ORDERED that appellee submit the documents listed below by thedates indicated.Certificate as to Parties, Rulings, andRelated CasesEntry of Appearance FormProcedural motions, if anyDispositive Motions, if any (Original and 4copies)

    January 9, 2012January 9, 2012January 9, 2A12

    January 23,2012It is

    FURTHER ORDERED that appellant submit a transcript status report every 30days after the filing of the initial report, until all transcripts have been received. Witfrinthree days of receipt of all transcripts, appellant is directed to file a Final Status Reportindicatingthedatethecompletetranscriptwasreceived.Allreportsffithe parties and each reporter. lt isFURTHER ORDERED that briefing in this case be deferred pending further orderof the court.The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this order to appellant by certified mail,return receipt requested, and by first class mail.

    FOR THE COURT:Mark J. Langer, ClerkBY: lslLaura M. ChipleyDeputy Clerk

    Page 2

  • 8/3/2019 TAITZ v RUEMMLER (APPEAL - D.C. CIR.) - Scheduling Order

    3/6

    !f,nitBh frtatux fi.surt sl AyFpw,LxFOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUITNo . 11 -5306 September Term 2011The following forms and notices are available on the Court's website:Attachments for Pro Se Parties Only:Civil Docketing Statement FormEntry of Appearance FormTranscript Status Report FoJr!Memqand u m Concerning Self-Representation

    Page 3

  • 8/3/2019 TAITZ v RUEMMLER (APPEAL - D.C. CIR.) - Scheduling Order

    4/6

    Sf,nitBi #tutux 6.surt of Af ypulxDistrict of Columbia CircuitE. Barrett Prettyman lJnited States Courthouse333 Constitution Avenue N,\V.Washington, D.C. 2000 l-2866MEMORANDUM CONCERNING SELF-REPRESENTATION

    The records of this Court indicate you are litigating this appeal in a pro secapacity. That is, you are not represented by an attorney and will be personallypreparing papers for submission to the Court.Decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States and of this Court have heldthat individuals representing themselves who are not attorneys are entitled to have theirpleadings viewed in a less restrictive manner than pleadings submitted by attorneys.

    Accordingly, you will be allowed to present your case in your own written words withoutstrict adherence to technical requirements, as is expected of attorneys.ln one regard, however, you will be strictly held to the requirements of theFederal Rules of Appellate Procedure and the Circuit Rules of this Court, as if you werean attorney. This is in the area of timeliness of your filings. For example, your briefmust be placed in the mail by the date established in the scheduling order issued by theCourt. Another example is in responding to a motion filed by the party opposing you.You have ten calendar days within which to respond to a motion, plus an additionalthree calendar days if the motion was served on you by mail. You will be expected toadhere to these time requirements and all others in the previously mentioned rules. lfany submission of yours is not made in a timely manner it will not be filed. lf youbelieve you have good reason for not adhering to the time requirements, you maysubmit your pleading along with a second filing entitled Motion For Leave To File Out OfTime. ln this second filing you should set forth your reasons for not having met the timerequirements and ask the court to file your pleading nevertheless. You should beaware, however, that these motions are not routinely granted, but are read andevaluated on an individual basis.Failure to comply with court orders, respond to dispositive motions byanother party, or file your brief will result in dismissal of the appeal for lack ofprosecution. See D.C. Cir. Rule 38.

    IUSCADC Form 92 (Rev. Feb 2011)l

  • 8/3/2019 TAITZ v RUEMMLER (APPEAL - D.C. CIR.) - Scheduling Order

    5/6

    UruITED STaTES CoURT oF ApPEALSDISTRIcT oF CoLUMBIA CIRcUIT333 Constitution Avenue, NW

    p h o n e, r#f,lX Hr?J i F:,:ffiii;'i,fi.2 1 e -85 3 0

    Case Caption:Case No:

    ENTRY OF APPEARANCEParty lnformationThe Clerk shall enter my appearance as counsel for the following parties:(List each party represented individually. Use an additional blank sheet as necessary)

    C Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s) C Appellee(s)/Respondent(s) fi lntervenor(s) # Amicus Curiae

    Names of Parties Names of PartiesCounsel lnformation

    Lead Counsel:

    V.

    2nd Counsel:DirectPhone: ( ) - Fax: ( ) Email:3rd Counsel:DirectPhone: ( ) - Fax: ( ) - Email:Firm Name:Firm Address:FirmPhone: ( ) - Fax: ( ) Email:

    Notes: This form must be submitted by a member of the Bar of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C" CircuNames of non-member attorneys listed above will not be entered on the court's docket.Applications for admission are available on the court's web site at http:/iwww.cadc.uscourts.gov/USCA Form 44August 2009 (REVISED)

  • 8/3/2019 TAITZ v RUEMMLER (APPEAL - D.C. CIR.) - Scheduling Order

    6/6

    1. CASE NO.3. CASE NAME (lead parties only)

    UTTITED STETES COURT OF APPEALSDISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

    333 Constitution Avenue, NWP h o n e, r#ii,lt Yo,8X i ?:':l,l?,';:1o|,2 1 e -Bo 3 o

    CIVIL DOCKETING STATEMENTAll Cases Other than Administrative Ageney Cases (To be completed by appellant)2. DATE DOCKETED:V.

    4. TYPE OF CASE: l-* District Ct - fl US Civilf*l Bankruptcy - if direct from il. private Civil fl,Criminal fl' Bankruptcy5.

    Bankruptcy CourtEXPEDITED? il*,. Original proceeding{*' Yes fl' NoS THIS CASE REQUIRED BY STATUTE TO BElf YES, cite statute6. CASE INFORMATION:a. District Court Docket No.Civil Action

    CriminalMiscellaneous

    BankruptcyBankruptcyAdversary

    Court Docket No.

    AncillaryOrder appealable as of rightbeing appealed: Magistrate Judge

    Tax Court Docket No.Tax

    $-*i lnterlocutory Order certified for appeal

    e. Date notice of appeal filed:Yes f,,, No lf yES, date filed:No lf YES, date filed:

    b.c.

    Review is sought of:f Final Order tr*: lnterlocutoryName of judge who entered orderJ udged. Date of order(s) appealed (use date docketed):f, Has any other notice of appeal been filed in this case?g. Are any motions currently pending in trial court? {*' Yes r{*,If YES, identify motion

    h. Has arf No, transcript of

    proceedings been ordered pursuant to FRAP 10(b)? {*, yes fl*, Nowhy not?

    Has this case been before the Court under another appeal number? fl Yes Appeal #Are any cases involving the same underlying order or, to counsel's knowledge, involving

    fl' Nosubsfa ntially the sameSupreme Court?lssue, currently pending before the District Court, this Court, another Circuit Court, or thef, Yes f No lf YES, give each case'S court and case name, and docket number:

    f. Ooes nis case turn on vatiOity or correct interpretation or application of a statute? f, yes fl, Nolf YES, give popular name and citation of statute7. Have the parties attempted to resolve issues in tnis case tnrough arbitration, mediation, or another alternative fodispute resolution? f Yes C trto lf so, provide program name and participation datesSignature DateName of PartyName of Counsel for AppellanVPetitionerAddressPhone ( )_ Fax (-) -ATTACH A CERTIFICATE OF SERVICENote: tf counset for any other party believes that the iffrbi"iriSitbi.l'irEinitt'eA-is ini#uriteibi'ihcomptete, counsel may so advise the clerk withincalendar days by letter, with copies to all other parties, specifically referring to the challenged statement. Attach a certificate of servicethis form.

    USAC Form 42August 2009 (REVISED)