tailoring occupational therapy to the individual need of patients with dementia in the...
TRANSCRIPT
Poster Presentations P4S784
study accounting for the treatment effect size observed in the GAP study.
Conclusions: Early Phase 1 and 2 studies have demonstrated that human
immunoglobulin may have potential in the treatment of mild to moderate
AD. However, these preliminary findings in small groups of subjects will
need to be confirmed in large-scale, multi-center Phase 3 studies. One
study with Gammagard Liquid/Kiovig is currently ongoing and a second
is planned to begin in 2011.
P4-226 GLIAL CELL LINE-DERIVED NEUROTROPHIC
FACTOR IN LITHIUM-TREATED PATIENTS WITH
EARLYALZHEIMER’S DISEASE
Thomas Leyhe1, Ralf Saur2, Christoph Laske2, Thomas Gasser3,
Peter Annas4, Hans Basun4, Guido Straten2, 1University of T€ubingen,University of T€ubingen, Germany; 2Department of Psychiatry, T€ubingen,
Germany; 3Department of Neurology, T€ubingen, Germany; 4AstraZeneca,
S€odert€alje, Sweden, Sweden.
Background: Preclinical and clinical studies gave evidence that lithium
could be useful in the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease (AD). One possible
mechanism of action might be the induction of neurotrophins. Recently, we
found a significant increase of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF)
serum levels in AD patients treated with lithium and a significant decrease
of ADAS Cog sum scores in comparison to placebo-treated patients. In an-
other previous study we have shown that glial cell line-derived neurotro-
phic factor (GDNF) levels in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of patients with
early AD are increased most probably due to an upregulated expression
in CNS as an adaptive process of the impaired brain to enhance neurotro-
phic support at least in early stages of disease. Methods:Here we assessed
the influence of a lithium treatment on GDNF serum and CSF concentra-
tions in a subset of a greater sample recruited for a randomized, single-
blinded, placebo-controlled, parallel-group multicenter 10-week study, in-
vestigating the efficacy of lithium treatment in AD patients. Results: We
found a significant negative correlation of lithium concentration in serum
with GDNF concentration in CSF at the end of treatment and with the dif-
ference of GDNF concentration in CSF before and after treatment. However,
we could not show a difference in GDNF concentrations between the pa-
tients after the treatment with lithium or placebo.Conclusions: The findings
of the present investigation indicate that beneficial effects of the lithium
treatment such as improvement of neurotrophic support by increase of
BDNF might reduce the necessity of enhanced GDNF expression in the
CNS in early AD.
P4-227 DIVERGENCE OF EFFECTANALYSIS (SLOPE
ANALYSIS) IN DISEASE-MODIFYING AD TRIALS
David Li1, Keith Gregg2, Suna Barlas1, 1Pfizer, Collegeville, Pennsylvania,
United States; 2Janssen Alzheimer Immunotherapy Research &
Development, LLC, South San Francisco, California, United States.
Background: Slope analysis has been recommended by certain regula-
tory agencies to support characterization of disease-modifying effect of
an experimental drug. Two issues are to be resolved to conduct a valid
slope analysis: 1) linearity assumption of responses, and 2) missing
data due to dropouts. Methods: A new statistical slope analysis (diver-
gence of effect analysis) will be considered. This approach is to confirm in-
creasing separation of response differences over time between treated and
placebo group. No linearity assumption of response in each group is
needed. Missing data issue can also be addressed via sensitivity analyses.
Clinical trials will be simulated to evaluate the performance of this ap-
proach and other approaches, in characterizing the disease-modifying ef-
fect in AD trials. The pros and cons of different approaches will be
summarized. Results: It is confirmed that the new statistical approach is
free of assumption that the response in each group is linear, and is robust
to missing data mechanism in general. Conclusions: This new statistical
approach of slope analysis (divergence of effect) should be recommended
to use in AD trials.
P4-228 TAILORING OCCUPATIONALTHERAPY TO THE
INDIVIDUAL NEED OF PATIENTS WITH
DEMENTIA IN THE PATIENTS’ HOME SETTINGS:
A PROSPECTIVE MULTI-CENTRE RANDOMIZED,
CONTROLLED TRIAL (ERGODEM)
Kira Marschner1, Luisa Jurjanz2, Antje Gerner2, Thomas Reuster3,
Meyer Shirin4, Thomas Kallert5, Rainer Koch6, Thomas Becker7,
Matthias Schuetzwohl4, Vjera Holthoff8, 1German Centre for
Neurodegenerative Disorders and Division of Old Age Psychiatry and
Cognitive Neuropsychiatry, University Hospital, University of Technology,
Dresden, Germany; 2Department of Psychiatry, Division of Old Age
Psychiatry, University Hospitals, University of Technology, Dresden,
Germany; 3Staedtisches Klinikum Goerlitz gGmbH, Goerlitz, Germany;4Department of Psychiatry, University Hospitals, University of Technology,
Dresden, Germany; 5Parkkrankenhaus, Leipzig, Germany; 6University of
Technology, Dresden, Germany; 7Bezirkskrankenhaus G€unzburg,
Department of Psychiatry, University of Ulm, G€unzburg, Germany;8Department of Psychiatry, Division of Old Age Psychiatry and Cognitive
Neuropsychiatry, University Hospitals, University of Technology and
German Centre for Neurodegenerative Disorders, Dresden, Germany.
Background: Patients suffering from Alzheimer’s disease are in need of
substantial aid to remain in their own homes as long possible. The study
was aimed at investigating the effect of client-centered occupational therapy
delivered at the patients’ homes together with the caregiver. Here we report
the results of the impact of tailored occupational therapy on the patients’ ac-
tivities of daily living (ADL) and cognition and the follow-up evaluation 3
and 6months later.Methods:A total of 160 patients (76.56 7.4 yrs, MMSE
20.86 3.9 points) and their informal caregivers were randomly assigned to
12 sessions of occupational therapy over 6 weeks added to treatment as
usual (TAU) or to TAU only. Assessment and definition of occupational ther-
apy aims were based on the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure
and Canadian Model of Occupational Performance (COPM). Outcomes
for ADL (ADCS-ADL) and cognition (ADAS-Cog) were measured at base-
line, 2 weeks, 3 months and 6 months after end of intervention or corre-
sponding time point in the TAU group. The analyses are based on linear
models with autoregressive covariance structure for correlated measures.
In model I, the design factors treatment group, time point, centre as well
as interactions between the design factors were included. Model II addition-
ally included MMST, age, and gender, model III additionally baseline as-
sessment. The multiple comparisons of means are Tukey adjusted.
Results: Patients were aged 76.5 6 7.4 yrs and showed a MMSE of 20.8
6 3.9 points. Analysis for the intervention effect on ADL revealed a signif-
icant interaction between treatment and time, and a significant treatment ef-
fect (p < .0001) in model III, in which significant differences between the
two groups were found 2 weeks (p ¼ .0039), 3 months (p ¼ .0002) and 6
months after treatment (p ¼ .0011). Analysis of cognitive functioning
showed treatment x time interaction in model I (p ¼ .0213) and II (p ¼.0225) and model III (p¼ .066).Conclusions:Client-centered occupational
therapy tailored to the capabilities of dementia patients and supporting their
families in the patients’ home settings resulted in clinically relevant benefits
in activities of daily living and effects were still observed 6 months after
completing the intervention.
P4-229 EFFECTS OF EXTENDED-RELEASE MEMANTINE
(28 MG/DAY) ON COGNITIVE DOMAINS IN
PATIENTS WITH MODERATE TO SEVERE
ALZHEIMER’S DISEASE: POST HOC ANALYSIS
OFA RANDOMIZED TRIAL
Michael Tocco1, Suzanne Hendrix2, Michael Miller3, Vojislav Pejovic4,
Stephen Graham5, 1Forest Research Institute, Jersey City, New Jersey,
United States; 2Pentara Corporation, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States;3Prescott Medical Communications Group, Chicago, New Jersey, United
States; 4Prescott Medical Communications Group, Chicago, Illinois, United
States; 5Forest Reseach Institute, Jersey Citty, New Jersey, United States.