tacoma-pierce county health department -- e-cigarette e-mails april 2011 part 2

8/4/2019 Tacoma-Pierce County Health Department -- E-Cigarette E-Mails April 2011 Part 2

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/tacoma-pierce-county-health-department-e-cigarette-e-mails-april-2011-part 1/296

From: Kirsten Frandsen

To: Kirsten Frandsen

Date: 4/17/2011 11:26:54 PM

Subject: new

Attachments: TobaccoPolicy Process andTimeline 4-16-11.xlsx

8_19_2011




To: Steve Marek

Frank Dibiase

Bridget Vandeventer

Bruce Rytkonen

'[email protected]'

Tutrecia Giles

Date: 4/17/2011 11:30:36 PMSubject: Revised process and timeline chart 4/16/11


Hi everyone,

Attached is the revised Tobacco Process and Timeline chart.

I have made the changes we discussed on Friday and added some new Communications tasks, per Bridget.

Also, I have asked Jaime to find a different meeting room for our standing Friday meetings, per Steve. So, look for

an email from Jaime to this effect. Note- no changes in date and times, just location.

Thanks, Kirsten

Page 1

8_19_2011




To: Frank Dibiase

Date: 4/18/2011 12:12:12 PM

Subject: Draft PP for BOH Study Session

Attachments: DRAFT BOH February 20 Tobacco Study Session.pptx

Hi Frank,

Attached is a draft powerpoint for BOH study session on Wednesday. I kept it short/succinct.

Wanted to bring in the questions brought forth at the last BOH meeting on FDA’s position and past TPCHD Tobacco

policies. Then lead into a quick overview of the main points of the e-cig resolution with conversation. Then the

same with local SIPP resolution. End with next steps. Please note the snapshot of the FDA video- if you can

watch it, that would be great. I think it would be good to play for the Board. It’s less than 4 minutes. Please let

me know what you think. I can modify based on your suggestions today.

Thanks,

Kirsten Frandsen

Tacoma-Pierce County Health Department

Program Coordinator: Physical Activity, Nutrition, and Tobacco

253.798.3540

[email protected]

Page 1

8_19_2011



From: Frank Dibiase


Bridget Vandeventer

Date: 4/18/2011 2:26:06 PM

Subject: FW: E-cigarettes - additional information from Heidi Henson

Attachments: e-cigs letter to BOH April 2011.doc

TAPmission, bylawsmay2010.doc

resume april 2011.docx

FYI

From:TawanaBellamy

Sent: Monday, April 18, 2011 10:37 AM

To:Cindy DeGrosse ([email protected]); Cindy Leingang ([email protected]);Cindy

Willis ([email protected]); Connie Perry ([email protected]); DickMuri ([email protected]);DO Stan Flemming ([email protected]); Jake Fey ([email protected]); Leslie Swalley

([email protected]);MarilynStrickland ([email protected]); MarkWilliams

([email protected]); Pat McCarthy ([email protected]); Patricia Johnson ([email protected]);

RebeccaSullivan ([email protected]);Rick Talbert ([email protected]); Ron Lucas

([email protected]); Victoria Woodards ([email protected]); 'Patricia Johnson'

Cc: Anthony Chen; Steve Marek; Frank Dibiase

Subject: E-cigarettes - additional information from Heidi Henson

Good morning Board of Health Members,

I'm forwarding you some additional information from Heidi Henson, Tobacco-Free Alliance of Pierce. She spoke at

the April 6th BOH meeting. Please read the E-cigarettes letter to the BOH April 2011 document first.

Thank you.

Tawana Bellamy

ConfidentialAssistant II

Office of the Director

Tacoma-Pierce CountyHealthDepartment

Phone: (253) 798-2899

Healthy People in Healthy Communities

Page 1

8_19_2011



From: Heidi Henson [mailto:[email protected]]

Sent: Friday, April 15, 2011 12:36 PM

To: TawanaBellamy

Cc: Frank Dibiase

Subject: Board of Health

Hello Tawana,

Please forward this email with the attachments to the all the members of the Board of Health.

Thanks somuch,

Heidi Henson

253.223.7538

Page 2

8_19_2011



From: Steve Marek

To: Jaime Paulson

Date: 4/18/2011 11:58:54 AM

Subject: FW: Revised process and timeline chart 4/16/11


Could you print a color copy of this. Thanks.


Sent: Sunday, April 17, 2011 8:31 PM

To: SteveMarek;FrankDibiase; Bridget Vandeventer; Bruce Rytkonen; '[email protected]'; TutreciaGiles

Subject: Revised process and timeline chart 4/16/11

Hi everyone,

Attached is the revised Tobacco Process and Timeline chart.

I have made the changes we discussed on Friday and added some new Communications tasks, per Bridget.

Also, I have asked Jaime to find a different meeting room for our standing Friday meetings, per Steve. So, look for

an email from Jaime to this effect. Note- no changes in date and times, just location.

Thanks, Kirsten

Page 1

8_19_2011



From: Gregory Jacoby <[email protected]>

To: Steve Marek

Frank Dibiase

Kirsten Frandsen

TutreciaGiles

Bruce Rytkonen

Bridget Vandeventer

Date: 4/18/2011 3:00:24 PMSubject: LocalSmoking Regs

Attachments: TPCHD SIPP regs_GAJ 041811.docx

TPCHD E-Cig regs_GAJ 041811.docx

I have attached new drafts of the Local SIPP and E-Cigarette regulations. These drafts (dated April 18th)

incorporate the changes discussed at Friday’s meeting as well as the changes recommended in recent emails.

Gregory A. Jacoby

McGavick Graves, P.S.

1102 Broadway, Suite 500

Tacoma, WA 98402

253.627.1181

[email protected]

The information contained in this e-mail message may be privileged, confidential and protected from disclosure. If

you arenot the intended recipient, any dissemination, distribution or copying is strictlyprohibited. If you think that

you have received this e-mail message in error, please notify the sender via e-mail or telephone at 253.627.1181.

Page 1

8_19_2011



From: Bridget Vandeventer

To: 'TanyaMcClain'

'Sue Asher - PCMS'

Date: 4/18/2011 12:19:30 PM

Subject: May 2011 TPCHD column

Attachments: PCMS May 2011_FINAL.doc

Hi Tanya and Sue,

Hope you two are doing well and enjoying some sunshine! Attached is Dr. Chen's column for this month's newsletter.

Could I possible get on your mailing list to receive a copy each month as well?

Thanks,

Bridget Vandeventer

Bridget Vandeventer

CommunicationsandCommunityRelations Manager


253-798-2853 | cell: 253-405-6822 | [email protected]

Page 1

8_19_2011




To: Tawana Bellamy

Date: 4/18/2011 1:19:22 PM

Subject: RE: Emailing: 030211BOH MINS

Thankyou-

-----Original Message-----

From:TawanaBellamy



Subject:RE: Emailing: 030211BOH MINS

HiKirsten,

I sent you the approved minutes from the March BOH meeting. The minutes from the April meeting are not

approved yet and I'm still editing them. I have attached a copy of the audio recording of the April meeting. Let me

know if you have problems opening it.

Thanks.

Tawana




To: TawanaBellamy

Cc: Frank Dibiase


Tawana- thankyou for sending!

I just took a look through the minutes to get some information about comments made by a couple of BOH members

regarding our upcoming Tobacco legislation. However; I didn't see them referenced in the minutes. Am I able to get

a copy of the audio recording of the meeting?

Also, I did see extensive minutes from Kim Thompson of the Vaporium expressing her views on the upcoming e-

cigarette regulation. However; I understand that there were 2 other speakers (Heidi Hanson and Leonard

Sanderson) who also provided testimony. I did not see this reflected in the minutes...... I'm thinking that they need to be included to be consistent - Frank?

Thanks, Kirsten


From:TawanaBellamy



Subject: Emailing: 030211BOH MINS

Kirsten,

Here are the minutes from the March BOH meeting.

Page 1

8_19_2011



Thanks,

Tawana Bellamy




Phone: (253) 798-2899


Page 2

8_19_2011



From: Tawana Bellamy


Date: 4/18/2011 1:18:24 PM

Subject: RE: Emailing: 030211BOH MINS

Attachments: 040611BOHminutes.msv

HiKirsten,

I sent you the approved minutes from the March BOH meeting. The minutes from the April meeting are not

approved yet and I'm still editing them. I have attached a copy of the audio recording of the April meeting. Let me

know if you have problems opening it.

Thanks.

Tawana



Sent: Friday, April 15, 2011 6:07 PMTo: TawanaBellamy

Cc: Frank Dibiase


Tawana- thankyou for sending!

I just took a look through the minutes to get some information about comments made by a couple of BOH members

regarding our upcoming Tobacco legislation. However; I didn't see them referenced in the minutes. Am I able to get

a copy of the audio recording of the meeting?

Also, I did see extensive minutes from Kim Thompson of the Vaporium expressing her views on the upcoming e-

cigarette regulation. However; I understand that there were 2 other speakers (Heidi Hanson and Leonard

Sanderson) who also provided testimony. I did not see this reflected in the minutes...... I'm thinking that they need to

be included to be consistent - Frank?

Thanks, Kirsten


From:TawanaBellamy

Sent: Friday, April 15, 2011 3:17 PMTo: Kirsten Frandsen

Subject: Emailing: 030211BOH MINS

Kirsten,

Here are the minutes from the March BOH meeting.

Thanks,

Tawana Bellamy

ConfidentialAssistant IIOffice of the Director


Phone: (253) 798-2899


Page 1

8_19_2011



Page 2

8_19_2011



From: Steve Marek

To: 'Gregory Jacoby'

Frank Dibiase

Kirsten Frandsen

TutreciaGiles

Bruce Rytkonen

Bridget Vandeventer

Date: 4/18/2011 4:37:32 PMSubject: RE: LocalSmoking Regs

Thanks Greg. I appreciate your quick turn-around on these. We have a meeting on Friday to discuss so please get

comments to Greg soon and cc the rest of us.

Just a reminder that these are still draft and not for distribution at this time. Please do not share with community

partners, other staff not directly involved in this effort etc. We will be going public in near future and can share withothers then. Thanks. Steve.

From: Gregory Jacoby [mailto:[email protected]]

Sent: Monday, April 18, 2011 12:00 PM

To: Steve Marek; FrankDibiase; Kirsten Frandsen; Tutrecia Giles;Bruce Rytkonen; Bridget Vandeventer

Subject: LocalSmoking Regs


incorporate the changes discussed at Friday's meeting as well as the changes recommended in recent emails.

Gregory A. Jacoby



Tacoma, WA 98402

253.627.1181

[email protected]




Page 1

8_19_2011



Page 2

8_19_2011




To: ElizabethPulos

Kirsten Frandsen

Date: 4/18/2011 12:17:32 PM

Subject: RE: PCMS article

I am beginning to realize that you may be the most helpful and smartest person in this building, Liz. Thank you so

much!

Bridget Vandeventer


From: ElizabethPulos


To: Bridget Vandeventer;Kirsten Frandsen


Bridget,

The 1965 value is also from the National Health Interview Survey. Here's a link to a page showing values 1965-2009.

http://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/data_statistics/tables/trends/cig_smoking/index.htm

Nationally, 42% of adults smoked in 1965[a1] <> but this rate dropped to 24% a decade ago and 21% in 2009.

In the sentence above, the 24% value is for 1999, a decade before the most recent figures (2009). It should

probably say "in 1999" instead of "a decade ago" to be accurate.

Liz



To: Elizabeth Pulos; KirstenFrandsen


Hi Liz and Kirsten,

Page 1

8_19_2011



Attached is the draft of the PCMS column with Dr. Chen's edits. He made quite a few changes, but I think the

direction is still the same and it does push appropriately on the e-cigarette issue.

Liz- he added a stat from this site (http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0762370.html) about adult smoking rates in

1965. It cites the CDC, but I can't find the original report anywhere. I'm hesitant to include it without an accurate

source. Can you help me? If it's not this source, do you think we can find one that makes a similar point?

Thank you!

Bridget Vandeventer



Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2011 7:02 AM

To:Bridget Vandeventer

Cc:ElizabethPulos

Subject: PCMS article

Hi Bridget,

Attached is the revised article for PCMS. Thanks to Liz for the statistics. Liz, I am cc:ing you as I had a quick

question about one of the statistics you sent. You mention a 12% overall decrease but the numbers you provided

(24% v. 21%) suggest only a 3% decrease.....

Thanks, Kirsten

_____

I couldnot find the original source, but this is from http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0762370.htmlwhich cites CDC

Page 2

8_19_2011




To: Bridget Vandeventer

Date: 4/18/2011 3:26:00 PM


Thanks. Now I can only disappoint...





I am beginning to realize that you may be the most helpful and smartest person in this building, Liz. Thank you so

much!

Bridget Vandeventer




To: Bridget Vandeventer;Kirsten Frandsen


Bridget,

The 1965 value is also from the National Health Interview Survey. Here's a link to a page showing values 1965-2009.





Liz

Page 1

8_19_2011







Hi Liz and Kirsten,






Thank you!

Bridget Vandeventer





Cc:ElizabethPulos


Hi Bridget,




Thanks, Kirsten

Page 2

8_19_2011



_____

I couldnot find the original source, but this is from http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0762370.htmlwhich cites CDC

Page 3

8_19_2011





Kirsten Frandsen

Date: 4/18/2011 11:53:32 AM


Bridget,

The 1965 value is also from the National Health Interview Survey. Here's a link to a page showing values 1965-

2009.





Liz



To: Elizabeth Pulos; KirstenFrandsenSubject: RE: PCMS article

Hi Liz and Kirsten,






Thank you!

Bridget Vandeventer

Page 1

8_19_2011







Cc:ElizabethPulos


Hi Bridget,




Thanks, Kirsten

_____

[a1] <> I could not find the original source, but this is from http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0762370.html which

cites CDC

Page 2

8_19_2011



From: KirstenFrandsen

To: Tutrecia Giles

Date: 4/18/2011 12:40:40 PM

Subject: RE:Purchase e-cigarette

Thanks Tutricia!

Could I take a look at it? I'll share with Steve/Frank. Perhaps we can share at the Study Session on Wednesday?

Thanks, Kirsten

From: Tutrecia Giles


To:Kirsten Frandsen

Subject: RE: Purchase e-cigarette

I purchased a e-cig starter kit from 7/11. Let me know what you would like me to do w/ it.-tg

Tutrecia Giles,M.Ed.

Prevention Specialist


3629 So 'D' Street, MS-409

Tacoma, Washington 98418-6813

Direct (253) 798-4727

fax (253) 798-6450

[email protected]


Sent: Friday, April 15, 2011 7:30 AM

To: TutreciaGiles


Thanks!

_____


Page 1

8_19_2011




To:Kirsten Frandsen

Subject: Re: Purchase e-cigarette

The starter kits are about $79.99. I get one today.-tg

_____


Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2011 13:57:43 +0000

To: TutreciaGiles

Subject: Purchase e-cigarette

Hi Tutricia, Steve would like us to have a sample e-cigarette (perhaps kit?)

Would it be possible for you to purchase and have the department reimburse you?

Just let me know- thanks! Kirsten

Page 2

8_19_2011




To: KirstenFrandsen

Date: 4/18/2011 12:41:28 PM


Sure, I'll bring it to you.-tg






Direct (253) 798-4727

fax (253) 798-6450

[email protected]



To: TutreciaGiles

Cc: Steve Marek; Frank Dibiase


Thanks Tutricia!

Could I take a look at it? I'll share with Steve/Frank. Perhaps we can share at the Study Session on Wednesday?

Thanks, Kirsten



To:Kirsten Frandsen



Page 1

8_19_2011








Direct (253) 798-4727

fax (253) 798-6450

[email protected]



To: TutreciaGiles


Thanks!

_____



To:Kirsten Frandsen



_____


Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2011 13:57:43 +0000

To: TutreciaGiles





Page 2

8_19_2011




To: KirstenFrandsen

Date: 4/18/2011 12:39:38 PM








Direct (253) 798-4727

fax (253) 798-6450

[email protected]



To: TutreciaGiles


Thanks!

_____



To:Kirsten Frandsen



_____


Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2011 13:57:43 +0000

To: TutreciaGiles



Page 1

8_19_2011





Page 2

8_19_2011




To: Frank Dibiase

Date: 4/19/2011 12:20:20 PM

Subject: FW: Study Session PP

Fyi only-


Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2011 9:00 AM


Subject: RE: Study Session PP

Slide 2:

* Do we want to call them Tobacco Regulations? I'm on the fence because e-cigarettes don't have tobacco.

Slide 4:

* I'd add something about the really old one where we said that cigarettes couldn't be sold to minors. It reminds them

that it wasn't always the case and shows some history in our efforts.

Slide 7:

* I'd put "Regulation" or "Resolution" in the title so it's clear we're now talking about what we're trying to pass and

not the product itself.

* I think we need to be really careful with the word smoking. Technically, when you're using an e-cigarette you are

not smoking. The opponents will use other verbs, so we need to be careful.

* On the last bullet, I'd say "Prohibits marketing activities such as sampling or heavy discounts designed to attract

new and younger users.

Slide 8:

* The con sticky should have the same size font as the pro.

* The con is a little unclear to me. Maybe "Difficult for smokers who are using e-cigarettes to quit smoking."

* I'd call it "Cons" and not concerns.

Slide 10:

* Same comment re: Cons

And then overall, I'm not wild about the slide design. I actually like the color, but I don't like how the logo doesn't

Page 1

8_19_2011



blend into the background on the bottom right. A standard, nice looking PPT template is on my to-do list.

Finally, I see the Communications Plan bullet on the last slide. Do you need me to present or just briefly talk about

the plan?

Thanks!

Bridget

Bridget Vandeventer





Subject: Study Session PP

Hi Bridget, in anticipation of the Study Session tomorrow, would you mind taking a quick look at this powerpoint?

Any suggestions/edits appreciated!

Just an fyi about the "sticky note" slides. This is going to be interactive- I'll have real sticky notes, pens and large

sticky paper on the walls. The intent is to get the pros and concerns about the major components of each of the 2

regs. Each member will be asked to write their thoughts and we'll cluster their thoughts into themes. Will help us to

understand the big issues so we can address them in our process/strategy development.

Thanks for any assistance you can give- Kirsten

Page 2

8_19_2011



From: Frank Dibiase


Date: 4/19/2011 1:11:36 PM

Subject: RE: DRAFT BOH February 20 Tobacco Study Session.pptx

HiKirsten,

I replied below in red.



To: FrankDibiase


Hi Frank, thanks for the feedback. I made the changes that you suggested however; I'm stuck on one of them. The

comment re: moving the e-cigs/SIPP slides before the Answer Your Questions slides (on FDA position and BOH

Tobacco policies). I understand your point, but the FDA point directly leads into the conversation about the e-cigs

and may give folks some thought before we engage in discussion. The BOH tobacco policy piece can go anywhere

but think they should stay together.

So, I left the order, as is, but I added the 2 proposed regulations to the first slide to make it clear what we were

discussing so they won't get distracted. I can present in a way that the "questions" piece is just a "side" piece but

important for the conversation. How does this sound to you? If you still want me to move the slides, I can do that. I

think this is fine. I think it's important to remind Board members up front the main purpose of the discussion.

Incorporating the info in the 2nd slide works well.

Attached are the slides with all of your suggested changes except the one discussed above. Just let me know.

Also, regarding email to get back to Becky Sullivan- you should have received an email of which I bcc:d you. I

asked Allison for a one to two paragraph summary of her findings regarding the reasons why low income/priority

populations have higher rates of smoking. She gave me some articles but no summary- I asked her to get this done

by 10 AM today. Not sure whether this is going to get done and how well. Do you want to go with what we've got

or wait until I hear back from Allison to see what we've got? I did see that email. I think you can probably use the

info in the first paragraph Allison prepared. I think that covers it adequately.

I'll share with Bridget this AM. Green sheet? I saw your email with Bridget's comments. I don't think it needs to go

through the green sheet process, but once we get Anthony's comments and incorporate them into the presentation, it

Page 1

8_19_2011



might be good to have Anne Dillon review the slides. She may have formatting suggestions. Are you planning to go

with just handouts or actually project the presentation?

Thanks.!

Thanks! Kirsten

From: FrankDibiase



Subject: DRAFT BOH February 20 Tobacco Study Session.pptx

HiKirsten,

I like the presentation and like that it's short and to the point. I think the FDA video is great. I made a couple of

suggested changes using a comment box for some of the slides.

Nice job! Thanks.

Page 2

8_19_2011




To: Frank Dibiase

Date: 4/19/2011 9:29:40 AM


Attachments: DRAFT BOH February 20 Tobacco Study Session.pptx

Hi Frank, thanks for the feedback. I made the changes that you suggested however; I'm stuck on one of them. The

comment re: moving the e-cigs/SIPP slides before the Answer Your Questions slides (on FDA position and BOH

Tobacco policies). I understand your point, but the FDA point directly leads into the conversation about the e-cigs

and may give folks some thought before we engage in discussion. The BOH tobacco policy piece can go anywhere

but think they should stay together.


discussing so they won't get distracted. I can present in a way that the "questions" piece is just a "side" piece but

important for the conversation. How does this sound to you? If you still want me to move the slides, I can do that.




populations have higher rates of smoking. She gave me some articles but no summary- I asked her to get this done by 10 AM today. Not sure whether this is going to get done and how well. Do you want to go with what we've got

or wait until I hear back from Allison to see what we've got?

I'll share with Bridget this AM. Green sheet?

Thanks! Kirsten

From: FrankDibiase



Subject: DRAFT BOH February 20 Tobacco Study Session.pptx

HiKirsten,

Page 1

8_19_2011



I like the presentation and like that it's short and to the point. I think the FDA video is great. I made a couple of


Nice job! Thanks.

Page 2

8_19_2011




To: Frank Dibiase

Date: 4/19/2011 1:14:48 PM


Thanks for all.

I am revising based on your/Bridget comments and will send to you and Steve in prep for the meeting with ACtoday. I’ll ask Anne Dillon to stand by tomorrow to do a final touch. I plan on having pp plus handouts if you

agree.

Thanks, Kirsten

From: Frank DibiaseSent: Tuesday, April 19, 2011 10:12 AMTo: Kirsten FrandsenSubject: RE: DRAFT BOH February 20 Tobacco Study Session.pptx

Hi Kirsten,

I replied below in red.

From: Kirsten FrandsenSent: Tuesday, April 19, 2011 6:30 AMTo: Frank DibiaseSubject: RE: DRAFT BOH February 20 Tobacco Study Session.pptx

Hi Frank, thanks for the feedback. I made the changes that you suggested however; I’m stuck on one of them.

The comment re: moving the e-cigs/SIPP slides before the Answer Your Questions slides (on FDA position and

BOH Tobacco policies). I understand your point, but the FDA point directly leads into the conversation about thee-cigs and may give folks some thought before we engage in discussion. The BOH tobacco policy piece can go

anywhere but think they should stay together.


discussing so they won’t get distracted. I can present in a way that the “questions” piece is just a “side” piece but

important for the conversation. How does this sound to you? If you still want me to move the slides, I can do

that. I think this is fine. I think it’s important to remind Board members up front the main purpose of the

discussion. Incorporating the info in the 2nd slide works well.




populations have higher rates of smoking. She gave me some articles but no summary- I asked her to get this

done by 10 AM today. Not sure whether this is going to get done and how well. Do you want to go with what

we’ve got or wait until I hear back from Allison to see what we’ve got? I did see that email. I think you can

probably use the info in the first paragraph Allison prepared. I think that covers it adequately.

I’ll share with Bridget this AM. Green sheet? I saw your email with Bridget’s comments. I don’t think it needs to

go through the green sheet process, but once we get Anthony’s comments and incorporate them into the

presentation, it might be good to have Anne Dillon review the slides. She may have formatting suggestions. Are

you planning to go with just handouts or actually project the presentation?

Thanks.!

Thanks! Kirsten

Page 1

8_19_2011



From: Frank DibiaseSent: Monday, April 18, 2011 1:39 PMTo: Kirsten FrandsenSubject: DRAFT BOH February 20 Tobacco Study Session.pptx

Hi Kirsten,

I like the presentation and like that it’s short and to the point. I think the FDA video is great. I made a couple of


Nice job! Thanks.

Page 2

8_19_2011



From: Frank Dibiase


TutreciaGiles

Steve Marek

Date: 4/19/2011 8:11:42 PM

Subject: RE: E-cig smoking not allowed inTacomaMall

Great information. Steven Helm is Darlyne Reiter's son. Darlyne was a former media specialist in our department

who worked with Joby Winans.


Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2011 4:38 PM

To: Tutrecia Giles;Bruce Rytkonen; 'Gregory Jacoby'; SteveMarek; FrankDibiase; Bridget Vandeventer

Subject: RE: E-cig smoking not allowed in TacomaMall

Thank you for the informationTutrecia.

I wonder if Steven would be interested in sharing what you have written below at the June 1 BOHmeeting.

Thanks, Kirsten



To: Bruce Rytkonen; 'Gregory Jacoby'; Steve Marek; Frank Dibiase; Kirsten Frandsen; Bridget Vandeventer

Subject: E-cig smoking not allowed in TacomaMall

I saw a complaint on an e-cig forum website from a person who said that they were unable to smoke their e-cig in

the Tacoma Mall. I went to the mall today and met w/ Steven Heim, the mall's general manager, he said that it was

true. He said all Simon Malls (300 facilities) across the country are smoke free and that means you can't smoke

anything in the mall. He said he had done research on the product and understood that e-cigs contain nicotine, which

is highly addictive. This was curious to me because e-cigs are sold in the Tacoma Mall. He said that the kiosk rental

manager rented a space to an e-cig retailer w/out his previous approval. He said he told her "you might as well have

rented the space to a heroin dealer."

He called his corporate head quarters and was told that he was correct in banning the use of the item in the building.Steven stated that there is a no smoking sign at every door, and the company applies this policy to all smoking. They

have no plans of adding an addendum to their current code of conduct to specifically state "no smoking of e-

cigarettes". If customers want to smoke an e-cig, they can go outside and stand 25feet from the door.

Page 1

8_19_2011



He said that the mall is a family oriented establishment and want to project that image. Allowing the smoking e-cigs

throughout the mall would contradict that image. He stated that was the main reason why the Tinder Box smoke shop

is no longer located in the mall.-tg

TutreciaGiles,M.Ed.





Direct (253) 798-4727

fax (253) 798-6450

[email protected]

Page 2

8_19_2011




To: TutreciaGiles

Bruce Rytkonen

'Gregory Jacoby'

Steve Marek

Frank Dibiase

Bridget Vandeventer

Date: 4/19/2011 7:37:34 PMSubject: RE: E-cig smoking not allowed inTacomaMall



Thanks, Kirsten












He called his corporate head quarters and was told that he was correct in banning the use of the item in the building.

Steven stated that there is a no smoking sign at every door, and the company applies this policy to all smoking. They






TutreciaGiles,M.Ed.

Page 1

8_19_2011







Direct (253) 798-4727

fax (253) 798-6450

[email protected]

Page 2

8_19_2011




To: Randy Grein

Date: 4/19/2011 4:31:12 PM

Subject: RE: Incident 30467 - Fortinet Ignoring WebAuth-Other & Defaulted her

Well I've got to run out for the day now, so I'm not sure how much help I'll be this afternoon. But basically what

happens is any video tries to load and does the spinning dots thing. Then after a few minutes it says "An error

occurred. Please try again later."

It didn't always do this, but I'm not sure when it switched.

Bridget Vandeventer


From: Randy Grein




OK, what's the symptom? Youtube is streaming OK now. Give me a call...



To: Randy Grein


Hey Randy,

I found another issue I'm hoping you can help me with. I can access YouTube (and YouTube embedded videos) but

I can't watch any of them. It's a standard way for media to host video content, so it's difficult to do my job without

that. For example, I'm trying to watch a video about e-cigarettes on the FDA website, and it won't let me.

Can you help with that?

Thanks!

Page 1

8_19_2011



Bridget Vandeventer


From: Randy Grein




Glad to hear it is working! We had some really fun time tracking the problem down.



To: Randy Grein

Cc: Stan Prothero


It works!!!

Thank you so much. This is really helpful for me to get things done.

Bridget Vandeventer


From: Randy Grein



Cc: Stan Prothero


Sure. Get right on it.

Page 2

8_19_2011





To: Randy Grein

Cc: Stan Prothero


HiRandy,

Checking back in on this. Because I'm not able to access Facebook, I can't contribute to the Access To Care grant

application by their deadline. I've shut down and restarted my computer every day, but it's just not changing.

Can you help?

Thanks!

Bridget Vandeventer




To: Randy Grein


HiRandy-

Has there been any resolution to this? I still can't get through to the sites. I'm trying to get some facebook advertising

rates for the Access to Care team, but can't help them without access.

Thanks!

Bridget Vandeventer


Page 3

8_19_2011



From: Randy Grein



Subject: Incident 30467 - Fortinet Ignoring WebAuth-Other & Defaulted her

Bridget, could you please log out and log in again? Then call me at 6443.

Randy

Incident 30467

Caller: Bridget Vandeventer TRAINING & COMMUNICATIONS D Street

Phone: 253 798 2853

Summary: Fortinet IgnoringWebAuth-Other & Defaulted her

_____

Added by Kirkman, Lance on Friday, April 08, 2011 8:38 AM


"My web permissions seem to have changed again. I'm supposed to have access to Twitter, bit.ly, Facebook, etc.

and did yesterday, but that's changed. Can you look into it for me?"

BVANDEVENTER

TPCHDLOCAL/FW-WEBAUTH-DEFAULT

1

0 day(s) 0 hour(s) 26 minute(s)

192.103.156.47

11 MB

FSAE

I show Bridget a member of Webauth-Other but Fortinet says she's default (LK) >> RG

_____

Support Call ID: %#%9eaf633e-1b94-4e52-9d56-ee6950ef5d7c%#%>

Page 4

8_19_2011




To: Randy Grein

Date: 4/19/2011 11:44:44 AM


Hey Randy,





Thanks!

Bridget Vandeventer


From: Randy Grein







To: Randy Grein

Cc: Stan Prothero


It works!!!


Page 1

8_19_2011



Bridget Vandeventer


From: Randy Grein



Cc: Stan Prothero





To: Randy Grein

Cc: Stan Prothero


HiRandy,



Can you help?

Thanks!

Bridget Vandeventer




To: Randy Grein


Page 2

8_19_2011



HiRandy-



Thanks!

Bridget Vandeventer


From: Randy Grein





Randy

Incident 30467


Phone: 253 798 2853


_____





BVANDEVENTER


1

Page 3

8_19_2011




192.103.156.47

11 MB

FSAE


_____


Page 4

8_19_2011



From: Randy Grein


Date: 4/19/2011 11:48:50 AM


OK, I’ll start a ticket, it may take a few days to resolve. I know you haven’t gone through the ‘contacting support’

spiel, but when you have a problem like this contact the helpdesk first. You really will get better service overall. I

could be out like last week, etc.

From: Bridget VandeventerSent: Tuesday, April 19, 2011 8:45 AMTo: Randy GreinSubject: RE: Incident 30467 - Fortinet Ignoring WebAuth-Other & Defaulted her

Hey Randy,

I found another issue I’m hoping you can help me with. I can access YouTube (and YouTube embedded videos) but

I can’t watch any of them. It’s a standard way for media to host video content, so it’s difficult to do my job without

that. For example, I’m trying to watch a video about e-cigarettes on the FDA website, and it won’t let me.


Thanks!

Bridget Vandeventer253-798-2853 | cell: 253-405-6822 | [email protected]

From: Randy GreinSent: Friday, April 15, 2011 12:02 PMTo: Bridget Vandeventer



From: Bridget VandeventerSent: Friday, April 15, 2011 12:01 PMTo: Randy GreinCc: Stan ProtheroSubject: RE: Incident 30467 - Fortinet Ignoring WebAuth-Other & Defaulted her

It works!!!



From: Randy GreinSent: Friday, April 15, 2011 8:52 AMTo: Bridget VandeventerCc: Stan ProtheroSubject: RE: Incident 30467 - Fortinet Ignoring WebAuth-Other & Defaulted her


From: Bridget VandeventerSent: Friday, April 15, 2011 8:52 AMTo: Randy GreinCc: Stan Prothero

Page 1

8_19_2011




Hi Randy,

Checking back in on this. Because I’m not able to access Facebook, I can’t contribute to the Access To Care grant

application by their deadline. I’ve shut down and restarted my computer every day, but it’s just not changing.

Can you help?

Thanks!


From: Bridget VandeventerSent: Wednesday, April 13, 2011 8:57 AMTo: Randy GreinSubject: RE: Incident 30467 - Fortinet Ignoring WebAuth-Other & Defaulted her

Hi Randy-

Has there been any resolution to this? I still can’t get through to the sites. I’m trying to get some facebook

advertising rates for the Access to Care team, but can’t help them without access.

Thanks!


From: Randy GreinSent: Friday, April 08, 2011 10:51 AMTo: Bridget VandeventerSubject: Incident 30467 - Fortinet Ignoring WebAuth-Other & Defaulted her


Randy

Incident 30467


Phone: 253 798 2853

Summary: Fortinet Ignoring WebAuth-Other & Defaulted her



"My web permissions seem to have changed again. I’m supposed to have access to Twitter, bit.ly, Facebook,

etc. and did yesterday, but that’s changed. Can you look into it for me?"

BVANDEVENTER TPCHDLOCAL/FW-WEBAUTH-

DEFAULT10 day(s) 0 hour(s) 26

minute(s)192.103.156.47

11

MBFSAE



Page 2

8_19_2011



From: Randy Grein


Date: 4/19/2011 3:56:52 PM


OK, what’s the symptom? Youtube is streaming OK now. Give me a call…

From: Bridget VandeventerSent: Tuesday, April 19, 2011 8:45 AMTo: Randy GreinSubject: RE: Incident 30467 - Fortinet Ignoring WebAuth-Other & Defaulted her

Hey Randy,

I found another issue I’m hoping you can help me with. I can access YouTube (and YouTube embedded videos) but

I can’t watch any of them. It’s a standard way for media to host video content, so it’s difficult to do my job without

that. For example, I’m trying to watch a video about e-cigarettes on the FDA website, and it won’t let me.


Thanks!


From: Randy GreinSent: Friday, April 15, 2011 12:02 PMTo: Bridget VandeventerSubject: RE: Incident 30467 - Fortinet Ignoring WebAuth-Other & Defaulted her


From: Bridget VandeventerSent: Friday, April 15, 2011 12:01 PMTo: Randy GreinCc: Stan ProtheroSubject: RE: Incident 30467 - Fortinet Ignoring WebAuth-Other & Defaulted her

It works!!!



From: Randy GreinSent: Friday, April 15, 2011 8:52 AMTo: Bridget VandeventerCc: Stan ProtheroSubject: RE: Incident 30467 - Fortinet Ignoring WebAuth-Other & Defaulted her


From: Bridget VandeventerSent: Friday, April 15, 2011 8:52 AMTo: Randy GreinCc: Stan ProtheroSubject: RE: Incident 30467 - Fortinet Ignoring WebAuth-Other & Defaulted her

Page 1

8_19_2011



Hi Randy,

Checking back in on this. Because I’m not able to access Facebook, I can’t contribute to the Access To Care grant

application by their deadline. I’ve shut down and restarted my computer every day, but it’s just not changing.

Can you help?

Thanks!


From: Bridget VandeventerSent: Wednesday, April 13, 2011 8:57 AMTo: Randy GreinSubject: RE: Incident 30467 - Fortinet Ignoring WebAuth-Other & Defaulted her

Hi Randy-

Has there been any resolution to this? I still can’t get through to the sites. I’m trying to get some facebook

advertising rates for the Access to Care team, but can’t help them without access.

Thanks!


From: Randy GreinSent: Friday, April 08, 2011 10:51 AMTo: Bridget VandeventerSubject: Incident 30467 - Fortinet Ignoring WebAuth-Other & Defaulted her


Randy

Incident 30467


Phone: 253 798 2853




"My web permissions seem to have changed again. I’m supposed to have access to Twitter, bit.ly, Facebook,

etc. and did yesterday, but that’s changed. Can you look into it for me?"

BVANDEVENTER TPCHDLOCAL/FW-WEBAUTH-

DEFAULT10 day(s) 0 hour(s) 26

minute(s)192.103.156.47

11

MBFSAE



Page 2

8_19_2011



From: Randy Grein


Date: 4/19/2011 5:17:40 PM


OK, I've found what should be the answer. Try your video and let me know how well it works.



To: Randy Grein


Hey Randy,





Thanks!

Bridget Vandeventer


From: Randy Grein







Page 1

8_19_2011



To: Randy Grein

Cc: Stan Prothero


It works!!!


Bridget Vandeventer


From: Randy Grein



Cc: Stan Prothero





To: Randy Grein

Cc: Stan Prothero


HiRandy,



Can you help?

Thanks!

Page 2

8_19_2011



Bridget Vandeventer




To: Randy Grein


HiRandy-



Thanks!

Bridget Vandeventer


From: Randy Grein





Randy

Incident 30467


Phone: 253 798 2853


_____


Page 3

8_19_2011






BVANDEVENTER


1


192.103.156.47

11 MB

FSAE


_____


Page 4

8_19_2011



From: Bruce Rytkonen


Steve Marek

Frank Dibiase

Kirsten Frandsen

TutreciaGiles

Bridget Vandeventer

Date: 4/19/2011 11:55:58 AMSubject: RE: LocalSmoking Regs

Greg.....here'smy comments on:

Local SIPP

Section 10: Reinspection-I'd like to suggest that with several changes that we can take out the box diagram in

paragraph B.So inA the third linebeginning with "finding" would read:

"finding of a violation andany subsequent reinspectionwithin any five-year period also results........."

And then in paragraph B we could:

1.Delete "and following" in the second line

2. Put a "period" in the end after "Board of Health"

3. Take out the box diagram

E-Cigarette

Section 3: Findings I have some reservations about including "Gummy Bears, Peanut Butter Cups and Orange

Creamsicle." We know that Kim from the Vaporium will be looking at this language and realize that these flavors areexactly the same as part of her advertising. She will probably think that the Health Department is specifically targeting

her business , and treating her unfairly as compared to her competition who may be using other flavors in their ads,

but we don't include those flavors in our regulation. She could make a distracting stink about this with the Board . So

I'd suggest that we keep in "chocolate and strawberry." We may want to add other child friendly flavors.

Page 1

8_19_2011



Section 6: Suggest that the title be changed to "Sale or Providing to Minors Prohibited" as the intent of the paragraph

in several places includes to "give or furnish."

Section 9 Alternate: So what we're saying is that e-cigs could be used in taverns, bars, casinos, etc. where it's

currently postedwith signs that say "no minors allowed."

This may be where the BOH eventually wants to go with limiting restrictions on where e-cigs can or can't be used,

but I'd suggest that we not offer this option at this time. If they can't support the more comprehensive ban in "public

places and places of employment," we could then offer the alternative for their consideration.

Section 10: Enforcement

In paragraph B I'd like to suggest that it read......The civil penalties and reinspection fees that may be imposed.....







Gregory A. Jacoby



Tacoma, WA 98402

253.627.1181

[email protected]

Page 2

8_19_2011






Page 3

8_19_2011





Date: 4/19/2011 9:50:14 AM

Subject: RE: Local Smoking Regs

Thanks Greg-







Gregory A. Jacoby



Tacoma, WA 98402

253.627.1181

[email protected]




Page 1

8_19_2011



From: Jaime Paulson


Samantha Yeun

Date: 4/19/2011 6:06:58 PM

Subject: RE: Smoking in Public Places – PublicMeeting

Those meetings have been removed from the Auditorium Calendar. Let me know if there is anything else.

Thanks!



To: SamanthaYeun; Jaime PaulsonCc: Tutrecia Giles


Thanks Sam- Jaime- are you able to take both of these meetings off of the calendar (this Thursday and 4/27)?

Thanks, Kirsten

From: Samantha Yeun


To: Kirsten Frandsen; Jaime Paulson

Cc: Tutrecia Giles


I believed this Thurs. 2-5 was the old schedule date. I had no idea who schedule that one. The new schedule for

public hearing on SIPP & E-cig is Wednesday next week (4/27) 5- 8:30.

Sam



To: Jaime Paulson

Cc: SamanthaYeun; TutreciaGiles

Page 1

8_19_2011




Hi Jaime, I’m thinking that this is a public meeting that was never cancelled (it should not be on here any longer) but

this is interesting because I think we originally reserved it from 5:30 to 8:30 PM….

Tutrecia/Sam- can you shed some light on this?

Thanks, Kirsten

From: Jaime Paulson



Subject: Smoking in Public Places – Public Meeting

HiKirsten,

The above meeting is being held in the Auditorium this Thursday from 2 until 5 p.m. Does the meeting start at 2 p.m.

or is there prep and then it starts sometime after 2 p.m.? Thanks!

Jaime Paulson

Software Support Specialist II


3629 South D Street

Tacoma, WA 98418

(253) 798-4755 Direct Line

(253) 798-6498 Fax

[email protected]

Page 2

8_19_2011




To: Samantha Yeun

Jaime Paulson

Date: 4/19/2011 5:04:22 PM



Thanks, Kirsten

From: Samantha Yeun


To: Kirsten Frandsen; Jaime PaulsonCc: Tutrecia Giles




Sam



To: Jaime Paulson






Thanks, Kirsten

Page 1

8_19_2011



From: Jaime Paulson




HiKirsten,



Jaime Paulson



3629 South D Street

Tacoma, WA 98418

(253) 798-4755 Direct Line

(253) 798-6498 Fax

[email protected]

Page 2

8_19_2011




To: Jaime Paulson

Samantha Yeun

Date: 4/19/2011 6:10:08 PM


Thank you Jaime-

From: Jaime Paulson


To: Kirsten Frandsen; SamanthaYeun

Cc: Tutrecia Giles



Thanks!

From: Kirsten FrandsenSent: Tuesday, April 19, 2011 2:04 PM

To: SamanthaYeun; Jaime Paulson

Cc: Tutrecia Giles



Thanks, Kirsten

From: Samantha Yeun



Cc: Tutrecia Giles



Page 1

8_19_2011




Sam



To: Jaime Paulson






Thanks, Kirsten

From: Jaime Paulson




HiKirsten,



Jaime Paulson



3629 South D Street

Page 2

8_19_2011



Tacoma, WA 98418

(253) 798-4755 Direct Line

(253) 798-6498 Fax

[email protected]

Page 3

8_19_2011



From: Samantha Yeun


Jaime Paulson

Date: 4/19/2011 4:40:32 PM




Sam


Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2011 1:22 PMTo: Jaime Paulson






Thanks, Kirsten

From: Jaime PaulsonSent: Tuesday, April 19, 2011 12:44 PM



HiKirsten,



Page 1

8_19_2011



Jaime Paulson



3629 South D Street

Tacoma, WA 98418

(253) 798-4755 Direct Line

(253) 798-6498 Fax

[email protected]

Page 2

8_19_2011





Date: 4/19/2011 12:45:04 PM


I found one that Joby must have put together as a template that I’ve used once. It is here: F:\LIBSHARE\Logo-

CommunicationStandards\CommunicationStandards\PowerPoint Standards\Simple Color Strip Presentation

Template.pptx.

I’m planning on getting some graphic design help and making some better templates, but in the meantime this

can work.

I’ll have a copy of my plan with me in case they ask anything.

Thanks!


From: Kirsten FrandsenSent: Tuesday, April 19, 2011 9:35 AMTo: Bridget VandeventerSubject: RE: Study Session PP

Thanks Bridget, these are great comments- I’ll make the revisions.

Do you have a preferred template that I can use now or should I keep this one and just wait for your new

template?

With regard to your question about communication plan, I’m going to go through these next steps pretty quicklyso I don’t think it will be necessary to talk about the plan but if they do have any questions about it, it would be

great if you would like to answer them.

Thanks again!

From: Bridget VandeventerSent: Tuesday, April 19, 2011 9:00 AMTo: Kirsten FrandsenSubject: RE: Study Session PP

Slide 2:

Do we want to call them Tobacco Regulations? I’m on the fence because e-cigarettes don’t have tobacco.

Slide 4:

I’d add something about the really old one where we said that cigarettes couldn’t be sold to minors. It

reminds them that it wasn’t always the case and shows some history in our efforts.

Slide 7:

I’d put “Regulation” or “Resolution” in the title so it’s clear we’re now talking about what we’re trying to

pass and not the product itself.

I think we need to be really careful with the word smoking. Technically, when you’re using an e-cigarette

you are not smoking. The opponents will use other verbs, so we need to be careful.

On the last bullet, I’d say “Prohibits marketing activities such as sampling or heavy discounts designed to

attract new and younger users.Slide 8:

The con sticky should have the same size font as the pro.

The con is a little unclear to me. Maybe “Difficult for smokers who are using e-cigarettes to quit smoking.”

I’d call it “Cons” and not concerns.

Page 1

8_19_2011



Slide 10:

Same comment re: Cons

And then overall, I’m not wild about the slide design. I actually like the color, but I don’t like how the logo doesn’t


Finally, I see the Communications Plan bullet on the last slide. Do you need me to present or just briefly talk

about the plan?

Thanks!

Bridget


From: Kirsten FrandsenSent: Tuesday, April 19, 2011 6:46 AMTo: Bridget VandeventerSubject: Study Session PP

Hi Bridget, in anticipation of the Study Session tomorrow, would you mind taking a quick look at this powerpoint?Any suggestions/edits appreciated!

Just an fyi about the “sticky note” slides. This is going to be interactive- I’ll have real sticky notes, pens and large


regs. Each member will be asked to write their thoughts and we’ll cluster their thoughts into themes. Will help

us to understand the big issues so we can address them in our process/strategy development.


Page 2

8_19_2011





Date: 4/19/2011 12:00:26 PM


Slide 2:


Slide 4:

* I'd add something about the really old one where we said that cigarettes couldn't be sold to minors. It reminds them

that it wasn't always the case and shows some history in our efforts.

Slide 7:







Slide 8:




Slide 10:





the plan?

Thanks!

Page 1

8_19_2011



Bridget

Bridget Vandeventer





Subject: Study Session PP



Just an fyi about the "sticky note" slides. This is going to be interactive- I'll have real sticky notes, pens and large





Page 2

8_19_2011





Date: 4/19/2011 12:34:52 PM


Thanks Bridget, these are great comments- I'll make the revisions.

Do you have a preferred template that I can use now or should I keep this one and just wait for your new template?

With regard to your question about communication plan, I'm going to go through these next steps pretty quickly so I

don't think it will be necessary to talk about the plan but if they do have any questions about it, it would be great if

you would like to answer them.

Thanks again!





Slide 2:


Slide 4:

* I'd add something about the really old one where we said that cigarettes couldn't be sold to minors. It reminds themthat it wasn't always the case and shows some history in our efforts.

Slide 7:







Slide 8:

Page 1

8_19_2011






Slide 10:





the plan?

Thanks!

Bridget

Bridget Vandeventer




To:Bridget Vandeventer Subject: Study Session PP



Just an fyi about the "sticky note" slides. This is going to be interactive- I'll have real sticky notes, pens and largesticky paper on the walls. The intent is to get the pros and concerns about the major components of each of the 2



Page 2

8_19_2011




Page 3

8_19_2011



From: Apa, James<[email protected]>


Date: 4/19/2011 8:59:08 PM

Subject: RE: thanks and follow up

Attachments: E Cig Tough Q draft.doc

Thanks Bridget. Also, I’ve attached a draft version of a tough Q&A we developed.

In terms of rationale for extending the smoking ban in public areas, it basically boiled down to three arguments, all of

which were used prior to the vote:

1) Allowing e-cigarettes creates an enforcement problem for program staff and proprietors, as it’s difficult to

distinguish betweenan e-cigarette and the real thing

2) E-cigarette use can lead to more tobacco smoking in establishments in violation of the law, which leads to more

second hand smoke, which we now know from the Surgeon General can be instantly harmful. (This was based on a

couple observations by inspectors.)

3) Banning smoking in public sets an important social norm about the use of tobacco and other nicotine deliverydevices.

-James

_____

From: Bridget Vandeventer [mailto:[email protected]]

Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2011 1:36 PMTo: Apa, James

Cc: Li-Vollmer,Meredith; Ross, Kathryn;Valenzuela,Matias


I was JUST writing you guys a thank you. I appreciate your time so much. It was a really valuable use of a day for

me, so thank you so much.

This information is really helpful.After our conversation, I’m readjustingmycommunicationsplan a bit, and building

in a few more things based on your experiences. Our tobacco team is presenting the proposed regulations to the

BOH tomorrow during a study session, so we’ll probably have a good sense from that on where we stand and how

Page 1

8_19_2011



hard the process might be.

I’ll be in touch (probably more than you want!) on this and many other things I’m sure.

Thanks again,

Bridget

Bridget Vandeventer


From: Apa, James [mailto:[email protected]]




Subject: thanks and follow up

Hi, Bridget. It was great to meet yesterday, and we’re looking forward to working with you.

Regarding e-cigarettes, I’ve attached some documents from our program that may be useful to you, including the

staff report to the Board. Also, if you think it might be helpful, we could see if King County Councilmember Julia

Patterson, who’s a board member and was chair when the e-cigarette regulation passed, is available to consult with

any of your board members who would value her perspective.

Also, here’s the P-I story that kicked off the media coverage in the four days prior to our Board meeting lastDecember.

http://www.seattlepi.com/local/431707_e-cigarettes.html

And the story after it passed – four members voted for an amendment that would have stripped out the public

“vaping”ban, but it failed.

http://www.seattlepi.com/local/431933_e-cig-ban.html

Please let us know if there’s anything more we can do to help,

Page 2

8_19_2011



Best,

-James

James Apa

CommunicationsManager

Public Health - Seattle & King County

206-205-5442

[email protected]

www.kingcounty.gov/health

Follow us: www.facebook.com/KCPubhealth | www.twitter.com/KCPubhealth

*************************************************************************************

This e-mail and any attachmentsmaycontainconfidential and privileged information. It has been scanned for viruses.If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, delete this e-mail and

destroy any copies.

**************************************************************************************

*************************************************************************************

This e-mail and any attachmentsmaycontainconfidential and privileged information. It has been scanned for viruses.

If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, delete this e-mail and

destroy any copies.

**************************************************************************************

Page 3

8_19_2011




To: 'Apa, James'

Date: 4/19/2011 4:35:58 PM


I was JUST writing you guys a thank you. I appreciate your time so much. It was a really valuable use of a day for

me, so thank you so much.

This information is really helpful.After our conversation, I'm readjusting mycommunicationsplan a bit, and building in

a few more things based on your experiences. Our tobacco team is presenting the proposed regulations to the BOH

tomorrow during a study session, so we'll probably have a good sense from that on where we stand and how hard

the process might be.

I'll be in touch (probably more than you want!) on this and many other things I'm sure.

Thanks again,

Bridget

Bridget Vandeventer


From: Apa, James [mailto:[email protected]]




Subject: thanks and follow up

Hi, Bridget. It was great to meet yesterday, and we're looking forward to working with you.

Regarding e-cigarettes, I've attached some documents from our program that may be useful to you, including the staff

report to the Board. Also, if you think it might be helpful, we could see if King County Councilmember Julia

Patterson, who's a board member and was chair when the e-cigarette regulation passed, is available to consult with

any of your board members who would value her perspective.

Also, here's the P-I story that kicked off the media coverage in the four days prior to our Board meeting last

Page 1

8_19_2011



December.

http://www.seattlepi.com/local/431707_e-cigarettes.html

And the story after it passed - four members voted for an amendment that would have stripped out the public

"vaping"ban, but it failed.

http://www.seattlepi.com/local/431933_e-cig-ban.html

Please let us know if there's anything more we can do to help,

Best,

-James

James Apa

CommunicationsManager

Public Health - Seattle & King County

206-205-5442

[email protected]

www.kingcounty.gov/health

Follow us: www.facebook.com/KCPubhealth | www.twitter.com/KCPubhealth

*************************************************************************************


Page 2

8_19_2011



From: TutreciaGiles

To: HannaZarellijackson

Date: 4/20/2011 12:52:02 PM

Subject: FW: Smoking in Public Places – Public Meeting

TutreciaGiles,M.Ed.





Direct (253) 798-4727

fax (253) 798-6450

[email protected]



To: Jaime Paulson;SamanthaYeun

Cc: Tutrecia Giles


Thank you Jaime-

From: Jaime Paulson


To: Kirsten Frandsen; SamanthaYeun

Cc: Tutrecia Giles



Thanks!



To: SamanthaYeun; Jaime Paulson

Page 1

8_19_2011



Cc: Tutrecia Giles



Thanks, Kirsten

From: Samantha Yeun



Cc: Tutrecia Giles




Sam



To: Jaime Paulson






Thanks, Kirsten

From: Jaime Paulson

Page 2

8_19_2011






HiKirsten,



Jaime Paulson



3629 South D Street

Tacoma, WA 98418

(253) 798-4755 Direct Line

(253) 798-6498 Fax

[email protected]

Page 3

8_19_2011





TutreciaGiles

Date: 4/20/2011 12:35:00 PM


Steven Heim is Darlene Reitter's son.



To: Tutrecia Giles;Bruce Rytkonen; 'Gregory Jacoby'; SteveMarek; FrankDibiase; Bridget Vandeventer




Thanks, Kirsten





I saw a complaint on an e-cig forum website from a person who said that they were unable to smoke their e-cig inthe Tacoma Mall. I went to the mall today and met w/ Steven Heim, the mall's general manager, he said that it was








have no plans of adding an addendum to their current code of conduct to specifically state "no smoking of e-cigarettes". If customers want to smoke an e-cig, they can go outside and stand 25feet from the door.



Page 1

8_19_2011




TutreciaGiles,M.Ed.





Direct (253) 798-4727

fax (253) 798-6450

[email protected]

Page 2

8_19_2011



From: TutreciaGiles

To: Frank Dibiase

Kirsten Frandsen

Steve Marek

Date: 4/20/2011 11:43:22 AM


I told Mr. Heim that I would make him aware of the upcoming meetings, and he's welcome to attend. -tg

TutreciaGiles,M.Ed.





Direct (253) 798-4727fax (253) 798-6450

[email protected]

From: FrankDibiase


To: Kirsten Frandsen; Tutrecia Giles; Steve Marek


Great information. Steven Helm is Darlyne Reiter's son. Darlyne was a former media specialist in our department

who worked with Joby Winans.



To: Tutrecia Giles;Bruce Rytkonen; 'Gregory Jacoby'; SteveMarek; FrankDibiase; Bridget Vandeventer Subject: RE: E-cig smoking not allowed in TacomaMall



Thanks, Kirsten

Page 1

8_19_2011





















TutreciaGiles,M.Ed.





Direct (253) 798-4727

fax (253) 798-6450

[email protected]

Page 2

8_19_2011



From: Rick Talbert <[email protected]>

To: Tawana Bellamy

Date: 4/20/2011 2:05:28 PM

Subject: RE: E-cigarettes - additional information from Heidi Henson

Tawanna:

I may not be able to make it back for the study session today. Please let me know if you have quorum issues?

RickTalbert

CouncilMember District 5

[email protected]

From: Tawana Bellamy [mailto:[email protected]]



Willis; Connie Perry; DickMuri;Stanley Flemming; JakeFey ([email protected]); LeslieSwalley; MarilynStrickland ([email protected]); MarkWilliams; Pat McCarthy; Patricia Johnson

([email protected]); Rebecca Sullivan ([email protected]); RickTalbert; RonLucas





I’m forwarding you some additional information from Heidi Henson, Tobacco-Free Alliance of Pierce. She spoke at


Thank you.

Tawana Bellamy


Page 1

8_19_2011





Phone: (253) 798-2899




To: TawanaBellamy

Cc: Frank Dibiase


Hello Tawana,


Thanks somuch,

Heidi Henson

253.223.7538

*************************************************************************************



destroy any copies.

**************************************************************************************

Page 2

8_19_2011




To: 'Rick Talbert'

Date: 4/20/2011 2:13:30 PM


Mr. Talbert,

We still have a quorum if you cannot make it.

Thank you.

Tawana Bellamy




Phone: (253) 798-2899


From: RickTalbert [mailto:[email protected]]


To: TawanaBellamy


Tawanna:

I may not be able to make it back for the study session today. Please let me know if you have quorum issues?

RickTalbert

Page 1

8_19_2011



CouncilMember District 5

[email protected]

From: Tawana Bellamy [mailto:[email protected]]



Willis; Connie Perry; DickMuri;Stanley Flemming; JakeFey ([email protected]); LeslieSwalley; Marilyn

Strickland ([email protected]); MarkWilliams; Pat McCarthy; Patricia Johnson

([email protected]); Rebecca Sullivan ([email protected]); RickTalbert; RonLucas





I'm forwarding you some additional information from Heidi Henson, Tobacco-Free Alliance of Pierce. She spoke at


Thank you.

Tawana Bellamy




Phone: (253) 798-2899




To: TawanaBellamy

Cc: Frank Dibiase

Page 2

8_19_2011




Hello Tawana,


Thanks somuch,

Heidi Henson

253.223.7538

*************************************************************************************



destroy any copies.

**************************************************************************************

Page 3

8_19_2011





Date: 4/22/2011 7:16:50 PM

Subject: e-cigarettes on Real Housewives of Orange County

I called my friend at Nordstrom today (Director of Public Affairs) to ask about their policy about e-cigarettes in

stores. She's checking into it, but I did have to explain what an e-cigarette was first. Her response: "Oh like the crazy

lady in Real Housewives ofOrange County?"

So I googled, and I present to you:

Crazy Fight on 'RealHousewives'/The Daily Beast (12/17/10)

http://www.thedailybeast.com/video/item/crazy-psychic-starts-fight-on-real-housewives-of-beverly-hills/

I hope Lily is doing better and you got the answers you need! Have a great weekend!

Bridget

Bridget Vandeventer



253-798-2853 | cell: 253-405-6822 | [email protected] | [email protected]

Page 1

8_19_2011



From: Adria Moskowitz

To: Peggy McMurtrie

Date: 4/22/2011 11:07:34 AM

Subject: FW: New Timeline




To: AdriaMoskowitz


Hi Adria, would you be willing to print the attached document in color - 6 copies please? Then, if you could give to

Tutrecia or Bruce to bring over to the 9:30 meeting this morning?

Also, I will not be in this morning- I have a sick kid that I need to bring to the docs however; I am reachable if you

need anything by cell- 206.304.0776

Thanks! Kirsten

_____



To: Steve Marek; Frank Dibiase; 'Gregory Jacoby';Bridget Vandeventer; Tutrecia Giles;Bruce Rytkonen

Subject: RE: New Timeline

Hi everyone,

Based on Steve's revised timeline below, I've modified the Draft 4/16/11 Tobacco Planning Process and Timeline

worksheet to capture these changes. Unfortunately, I will be unable to join the meeting this morning- sick child.

I will ask Adria to make copies of this. Bruce and/or Tutrecia- would you be willing to bring copies over with you

this morning?

Thanks! Kirsten

_____

From: Steve Marek

Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2011 7:53 AM

To: FrankDibiase; Kirsten Frandsen; 'Gregory Jacoby'; Bridget Vandeventer Subject: NewTimeline

I thought the meeting went well yesterday. There were a few unanticipated twists and turns but it was a good

discussion and we got a pretty good idea of their concerns. After discussing this with Anthony yesterday and looking

Page 1

8_19_2011



at the calendar here is what I am tentatively proposing to do. This is rough but I think it can be done. My plan is to

discuss it with Anthony this afternoon so let me know if there are any "fatal" flaws or I am missing the boat on

anything. We can discuss in more detail at our meeting on Friday. Thanks. Steve.

April 29- have the regs done in "final" draft form and sent out with the BOH package with one page fact

sheet/summaryof key issues.

May 2nd- advertise public meeting, basically go public.

May 12th- public meeting

May 13th-16th-BOH package completed with final regs and any back up material.

May 18th- next BOHmeeting. Present regulations in final draft form with changes from public meeting (if any). Go

over key issues.

June 1-take regs to BOH for adoption.

July 6th BOH meeting if necessary.

Page 2

8_19_2011




To: Adria Moskowitz

Date: 4/22/2011 10:20:40 AM



Hi Adria, would you be willing to print the attached document in color - 6 copies please? Then, if you could give to

Tutrecia or Bruce to bring over to the 9:30 meeting this morning?

Also, I will not be in this morning- I have a sick kid that I need to bring to the docs however; I am reachable if you

need anything by cell- 206.304.0776

Thanks! Kirsten

_____

From: Kirsten FrandsenSent: Friday, April 22, 2011 7:19 AM

To: Steve Marek; Frank Dibiase; 'Gregory Jacoby';Bridget Vandeventer; Tutrecia Giles;Bruce Rytkonen

Subject: RE: New Timeline

Hi everyone,

Based on Steve’s revised timeline below, I’ve modified the Draft 4/16/11 Tobacco Planning Process and Timeline


I will ask Adria to make copies of this. Bruce and/or Tutrecia- would you be willing to bring copies over with you

this morning?

Thanks! Kirsten

_____

From: Steve Marek

Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2011 7:53 AMTo: FrankDibiase; Kirsten Frandsen; 'Gregory Jacoby'; Bridget Vandeventer

Subject: NewTimeline




discuss it with Anthony this afternoon so let me know if there are any “fatal” flaws or I am missing the boat on


April 29- have the regs done in “final” draft form and sent out with the BOH package with one page fact

Page 1

8_19_2011








over key issues.



Page 2

8_19_2011




To: Steve Marek

Frank Dibiase

'Gregory Jacoby'

Bridget Vandeventer

Tutrecia Giles

Bruce Rytkonen

Date: 4/22/2011 10:19:02 AMSubject: RE: New Timeline


Hi everyone,

Based on Steve’s revised timeline below, I’ve modified the Draft 4/16/11 Tobacco Planning Process and Timeline


I will ask Adria to make copies of this. Bruce and/or Tutrecia- would you be willing to bring copies over with youthis morning?

Thanks! Kirsten

_____

From: Steve Marek


To: FrankDibiase; Kirsten Frandsen; 'Gregory Jacoby'; Bridget Vandeventer Subject: NewTimeline




discuss it with Anthony this afternoon so let me know if there are any “fatal” flaws or I am missing the boat on


April 29- have the regs done in “final” draft form and sent out with the BOH package with one page fact






over key issues.

Page 1

8_19_2011





Page 2

8_19_2011



From: Stacey Krum <[email protected]>


Date: 4/22/2011 10:46:26 PM

Subject: RE: Starbucks policy on e-cigarettes in stores

Hey Mrs. Vandeventer! I saw about your new gig on Facebook. Very cool. I seem to recall the issue of e-cigarettes

coming up before, perhaps an incident in California. Let me check if we specifically address it in our no smoking

policy or not. Will give you a holler on Monday. Have a great weekend!

_____

From: Bridget Vandeventer [mailto:[email protected]]


To: Stacey Krum

Subject: Starbucks policy on e-cigarettes in stores

Hello Ms. Stacey Krum,

Let me introduce myself to you. I’ve recently joined the Tacoma-Pierce County Health Department as the

Communications and Community RelationsManager. You may have known me under a different name and in a

different organization, but I can assure you I am the same chipper, spunky Bridget of tick-tock fame. And I miss you

guys dearly!!!

Aside from catching up, I do have a work issue I’d love to chat with you about. We are exploring proposing

regulation to prohibit the use of e-cigarettes in public places in Pierce County, and I’m interested in knowing if

Starbucks Coffee Company has any policies about e-cigarettes in your stores. As an organization dedicated to health

and wellness and creating a safe and welcoming environment for all your customers, I’d love to hear your

perspective.

Could we jump on a call sometime soon to discuss? Facebook told me that you’re volunteering today, so maybe

sometimenext week.

Hope you’re well!

Bridget

Page 1

8_19_2011



Bridget Vandeventer




*************************************************************************************



destroy any copies.

**************************************************************************************

Page 2

8_19_2011




To: '[email protected]'

Date: 4/22/2011 5:27:04 PM



Let me introduce myself to you. I've recently joined the Tacoma-Pierce County Health Department as the

Communications and Community RelationsManager. You may have known me under a different name and in a

different organization, but I can assure you I am the same chipper, spunky Bridget of tick-tock fame. And I miss you

guys dearly!!!

Aside from catching up, I do have a work issue I'd love to chat with you about. We are exploring proposing

regulation to prohibit the use of e-cigarettes in public places in Pierce County, and I'm interested in knowing if


and wellness and creating a safe and welcoming environment for all your customers, I'd love to hear your

perspective.

Could we jump on a call sometime soon to discuss? Facebook told me that you're volunteering today, so maybe

sometimenext week.

Hope you're well!

Bridget

Bridget Vandeventer




Page 1

8_19_2011




To: Steve Marek

Date: 4/25/2011 3:26:46 PM

Subject: 2 questions re: Tobacco

Hi Steve, I have a couple of questions:

1. Paul (Madigan resident who works in Tobacco prevention) who attended the BOH study session last week would

like to work with us on the Tobacco policy project. Is this okay with you? If so, I thought he could help Tutrecia and

Bruce with doing the supportive research and conducting outreach to the community (e.g. identifyingmedical

providers, Medical Society) to support the testimony component. I would also invite him to participate in meetings. If

okay with you, I'll check in with Nigel to make sure that he's okay with this (apparently, Paul hasn't committed to CD

yet but I think this would be a courtesy to Nigel).

2. Would you like us to try to modify our existing TPCHD No Smoking policy to include e-cigarettes before the next

BOHmeeting?

Thanks,

Kirsten Frandsen


ProgramCoordinator: Physical Activity, Nutrition, and Tobacco

253.798.3540

[email protected]

Page 1

8_19_2011




To: Steve Marek

'Gregory Jacoby'

KirstenFrandsen

Tutrecia Giles

Frank Dibiase

Bruce Rytkonen

Date: 4/25/2011 2:02:50 PMSubject: E-cigarettes in the news

I wanted to get a feel for how e-cigarettes were positioned in the news and how other communities are managing the

issue. Here are a few articles I found interesting and relevant to our work here.

SanFrancisco considers banning e-cigarettes

http://abclocal.go.com/kgo/story?section=news/local/san_francisco &id=8089763

Their regulation sounds the same as what we're proposing. As expected, they have comments from e-cigarette

proponents including Ray Story. I expect he'll get involved here as well.

E-cigarettes included in county smoking ban

http://richmondregister.com/localnews/x1281105974/E-cigarettes-included-in-county-smoking-ban

This article is an account of the BOHmeeting in Richmond, KY. It sounds like it got very heated, and although the

regulation passed it was very tense.

The BetterBusiness Bureauwarns against "free" smokeless cigarette promo

http://www.walletpop.com/2011/04/21/better-business-bureau-warns-against-free-smokeless-cigarette/

Direct E-Cig apparently promoted free starter kits, but customers were then charged up to $200. After complaints

were filed in 44 states, BBB issued a warning about the company.

E-Cigarette bosses thrilled to have chain smoking Charlie Sheen on board

http://www.contactmusic.com/news.nsf/story/e-cigarettes-bosses-thrilled-to-have-chain-smoking-charlie-sheen-

onboard_1212866

Charlie Sheen has been using e-cigarettes on stage during his touring show to avoid the smoking in public places

laws. Not exactly the best spokesperson or role model right now.

Page 1

8_19_2011



I'll keep my eyes out to see if anything else comes up that may help us in our planning.

Thanks!

Bridget

Bridget Vandeventer

Communications and CommunityRelationsManager



Page 2

8_19_2011




To: Frank Dibiase

Date: 4/25/2011 4:41:40 PM

Subject: FW: 2 questions re: Tobacco

Hi, forgot to cc: you on this.

Thanks, Kirsten



To: Steve Marek

Subject: RE: 2 questions re: Tobacco

Sounds good- thanks

From: Steve Marek


To: Kirsten FrandsenSubject: RE: 2 questions re: Tobacco

Ok to 1st question. He should be included in our meetings.

Let's wait on the second until we see what the BOH is going to do.



To: Steve Marek






Page 1

8_19_2011




okay with you, I'll check in with Nigel to make sure that he's okay with this (apparently, Paul hasn't committed to CD



BOHmeeting?

Thanks,

Kirsten Frandsen



253.798.3540

[email protected]

Page 2

8_19_2011




To: Selina Chambliss

Date: 4/25/2011 4:28:50 PM

Subject: FW: BOH packets

Hi Selina, for the May 18th BOH meeting, we're going to use the same title that we used at the last Study Session-

do you have that title?

Thanks!

From: Steve Marek



Subject: RE: BOH packets

Let's use the same title as we did at the study session. As far as presenting I'm not sure yet. Will decide in next

couple of days. The fee schedule changes don't need to go to the BOH until June 1st.

From: Kirsten FrandsenSent: Monday, April 25, 2011 1:06 PM

To: Steve Marek


Hi Steve, please see below. Do you have a title that you would like to use on the agenda for the May 18th BOH

meeting where we'll present the proposed Tobacco regs?

Also, I wanted to check on who will be presenting at this meeting....

Lastly, I believe that Frank was going to work on the fee schedule but he's on vacation. We wanted to keep these on

the same timeline as the SIPP and E-Cig regs. However; those drafts are due to us by Greg today. Just wanted to

bring this to your attention and ensure this is okay in terms of timeline.

Thanks, Kirsten

Page 1

8_19_2011



From: SelinaChambliss



Cc:TawanaBellamy


HiKirsten,

Per our phone conversation, if it is a presentation we just need to know what the title of the presentation will be and

who will be presenting by this Friday. We mail out the packets on WednesdayMay 11, so if you have any

documents you would like sent to the Board please have them to us by then. Let me know if you need anything else.

Thanks,

Selina



To: SelinaChambliss

Subject: BOH packets

Hi Selina, can you please confirm the date that we need to get to you information for the May 18th BOH packets?

We have some materials for Tobacco that we would like included in the packets.

Thanks!

Kirsten Frandsen



253.798.3540

[email protected]

Page 2

8_19_2011



Page 3

8_19_2011




To: Steve Marek

Date: 4/25/2011 4:06:24 PM








Thanks, Kirsten



To: Kirsten FrandsenCc:TawanaBellamy


HiKirsten,

Per our phone conversation, if it is a presentation we just need to know what the title of the presentation will be andwho will be presenting by this Friday. We mail out the packets on WednesdayMay 11, so if you have any


Thanks,

Selina


Page 1

8_19_2011




To: SelinaChambliss




Thanks!

Kirsten Frandsen



253.798.3540

[email protected]

Page 2

8_19_2011



From: Steve Marek

To: Jaime Paulson

Date: 4/25/2011 4:17:58 PM

Subject: FW: Tobacco process and timeline- revised copy 4-25-11


Will you print a color copy of this for me. Thanks.



To: Bruce Rytkonen; Tutrecia Giles; Steve Marek; 'Gregory Jacoby'; Bridget Vandeventer; Frank Dibiase

Subject: Tobacco process and timeline- revised copy 4-25-11

Hi everyone, please see the latest copy of our process/timeline document dated 4-25-11.

Thanks,

Kirsten Frandsen



253.798.3540

[email protected]

Page 1

8_19_2011




To: Steve Marek

Date: 4/25/2011 4:06:40 PM


Sounds good- thanks

From: Steve Marek








To: Steve Marek






providers, Medical Society) to support the testimony component. I would also invite him to participate in meetings. If okay with you, I'll check in with Nigel to make sure that he's okay with this (apparently, Paul hasn't committed to CD



BOHmeeting?

Thanks,

Kirsten Frandsen

Page 1

8_19_2011





253.798.3540

[email protected]

Page 2

8_19_2011



From: Steve Marek


Date: 4/25/2011 4:04:14 PM






To: Steve Marek







okay with you, I'll check in with Nigel to make sure that he's okay with this (apparently, Paul hasn't committed to CDyet but I think this would be a courtesy to Nigel).


BOHmeeting?

Thanks,

Kirsten Frandsen



253.798.3540

[email protected]

Page 1

8_19_2011




To: Selina Chambliss

Date: 4/25/2011 4:30:34 PM


Not sure yet- will decide in the next couple of days.





Sure do. Will you be presenting or Steve?



To: SelinaChambliss


Hi Selina, for the May 18th BOH meeting, we're going to use the same title that we used at the last Study Session-


Thanks!

From: Steve Marek Sent: Monday, April 25, 2011 1:17 PM







To: Steve Marek

Page 1

8_19_2011










Thanks, Kirsten




Cc:TawanaBellamy


HiKirsten,




Thanks,

Selina



To: SelinaChambliss

Page 2

8_19_2011






Thanks!

Kirsten Frandsen



253.798.3540

[email protected]

Page 3

8_19_2011




To: Steve Marek

Date: 4/25/2011 4:28:56 PM


Got it- thanks

From: Steve Marek








To: Steve Marek








Thanks, Kirsten




Cc:TawanaBellamy

Page 1

8_19_2011




HiKirsten,




Thanks,

Selina



To: SelinaChambliss




Thanks!

Kirsten Frandsen



253.798.3540

[email protected]

Page 2

8_19_2011



From: Selina Chambliss


Date: 4/25/2011 4:29:56 PM


Sure do. Will you be presenting or Steve?

From: Kirsten FrandsenSent: Monday, April 25, 2011 1:29 PMTo: Selina ChamblissSubject: FW: BOH packets

Hi Selina, for the May 18th BOH meeting, we’re going to use the same title that we used at the last Study Session-


Thanks!

From: Steve Marek

Sent: Monday, April 25, 2011 1:17 PMTo: Kirsten FrandsenSubject: RE: BOH packets

Let’s use the same title as we did at the study session. As far as presenting I’m not sure yet. Will decide in next

couple of days. The fee schedule changes don’t need to go to the BOH until June 1st .

From: Kirsten FrandsenSent: Monday, April 25, 2011 1:06 PMTo: Steve Marek Subject: FW: BOH packets


meeting where we’ll present the proposed Tobacco regs?

Also, I wanted to check on who will be presenting at this meeting….

Lastly, I believe that Frank was going to work on the fee schedule but he’s on vacation. We wanted to keep these

on the same timeline as the SIPP and E-Cig regs. However; those drafts are due to us by Greg today. Just wanted

to bring this to your attention and ensure this is okay in terms of timeline.

Thanks, Kirsten

From: Selina ChamblissSent: Monday, April 25, 2011 12:57 PMTo: Kirsten FrandsenCc: Tawana BellamySubject: RE: BOH packets

Hi Kirsten,

Per our phone conversation, if it is a presentation we just need to know what the title of the presentation will be

and who will be presenting by this Friday. We mail out the packets on Wednesday May 11, so if you have any

documents you would like sent to the Board please have them to us by then. Let me know if you need anything

else.

Thanks,

Selina

Page 1

8_19_2011



From: Kirsten FrandsenSent: Monday, April 25, 2011 12:46 PMTo: Selina ChamblissSubject: BOH packets



Thanks!

Kirsten Frandsen



253.798.3540

[email protected]

Page 2

8_19_2011



From: Steve Marek


Date: 4/25/2011 4:17:12 PM






To: Steve Marek





Lastly, I believe that Frank was going to work on the fee schedule but he's on vacation. We wanted to keep these onthe same timeline as the SIPP and E-Cig regs. However; those drafts are due to us by Greg today. Just wanted to


Thanks, Kirsten

From: SelinaChamblissSent: Monday, April 25, 2011 12:57 PM


Cc:TawanaBellamy


HiKirsten,




Page 1

8_19_2011



Thanks,

Selina



To: SelinaChambliss




Thanks!

Kirsten Frandsen



253.798.3540

[email protected]

Page 2

8_19_2011




To: Tutrecia Giles

Date: 4/25/2011 1:15:48 PM

Subject: RE:E-cig/FDA

Hi Tutrecia,

I just realized that I can't access the file you shared because I don't have permissions for the Tobacco folder. Could

you sendme the argument/counter argument database?

Thanks!

Bridget Vandeventer





Subject: E-cig/FDA

Helloall,

Attached is the latest summation/article I could locate on the recent court effort by the FDA to regulate e-cigs.

Basically, it seems that the courts uphold the assertion by the e-cig manufactures that e-cigs are not

cessation/therapeutic products, but alternative "smokingdevices".The courts continue to rule that because e-cigs are

a type of recreational device, the FDA can regulate e-cigs like any other tobacco product, which is via marketing

regulations. The FDA won't be able to regulate any ingredients, including nicotine levels.

1. If e-cigs companies are saying that they are for "smoking pleasure only, not cessation" Why can't e-cigs be treated

like any other smoking product? ( i.e. SIPP/not to minors)

2. There is no evidence or claims by the manufactures that there isn't any harm to the environment or the individual

3. The e-cig manufactures state that the e-cigs includes some toxic chemicals, but no research done to see if the

vapors truly dissipate. One simply can't smell an odor, which implies nothing. (this is stated in the product warning

labels)

Page 1

8_19_2011



4. e-cigs are legal, adults can choose to use them as intended or not intended

5. We're not against a new nicotine replacement therapy, but this is not what the product was designed for or tested

to do.

6. If e-cigs are not banned from public spaces, 1. We don't know anything about the second hand mist 2.this may be

a trigger for past smoking to start smoking again 3. current regular smokers could say if they can "vape" indoors, why

can't I smoke indoors 4. Bruce mention the possible overall SIPP enforcement challenges

I have started an argument/counter argument database. Also, there are e-cigs articles and a pending list of e-cig

retailers. It is located at G:\LIBSHARE\Tobacco-EH\YouthTobacco\E Cigarettes -tg

TutreciaGiles,M.Ed.





Direct (253) 798-4727

fax (253) 798-6450

[email protected]

Page 2

8_19_2011



From: TutreciaGiles


Date: 4/25/2011 1:21:26 PM


Attachments: Regulation Arguments.docx

Here you go.-tg

TutreciaGiles,M.Ed.




Tacoma, Washington 98418-6813Direct (253) 798-4727

fax (253) 798-6450

[email protected]



To: Tutrecia Giles


Hi Tutrecia,

I just realized that I can't access the file you shared because I don't have permissions for the Tobacco folder. Could

you sendme the argument/counter argument database?

Thanks!

Bridget Vandeventer


Page 1

8_19_2011






Subject: E-cig/FDA

Helloall,

Attached is the latest summation/article I could locate on the recent court effort by the FDA to regulate e-cigs.

Basically, it seems that the courts uphold the assertion by the e-cig manufactures that e-cigs are not

cessation/therapeutic products, but alternative "smokingdevices".The courts continue to rule that because e-cigs are

a type of recreational device, the FDA can regulate e-cigs like any other tobacco product, which is via marketing

regulations. The FDA won't be able to regulate any ingredients, including nicotine levels.

1. If e-cigs companies are saying that they are for "smoking pleasure only, not cessation" Why can't e-cigs be treated

like any other smoking product? ( i.e. SIPP/not to minors)

2. There is no evidence or claims by the manufactures that there isn't any harm to the environment or the individual

3. The e-cig manufactures state that the e-cigs includes some toxic chemicals, but no research done to see if the

vapors truly dissipate. One simply can't smell an odor, which implies nothing. (this is stated in the product warning

labels)

4. e-cigs are legal, adults can choose to use them as intended or not intended

5. We're not against a new nicotine replacement therapy, but this is not what the product was designed for or tested

to do.

6. If e-cigs are not banned from public spaces, 1. We don't know anything about the second hand mist 2.this may be

a trigger for past smoking to start smoking again 3. current regular smokers could say if they can "vape" indoors, why

can't I smoke indoors 4. Bruce mention the possible overall SIPP enforcement challenges

I have started an argument/counter argument database. Also, there are e-cigs articles and a pending list of e-cig

retailers. It is located at G:\LIBSHARE\Tobacco-EH\YouthTobacco\E Cigarettes -tg

TutreciaGiles,M.Ed.





Direct (253) 798-4727fax (253) 798-6450

[email protected]

Page 2

8_19_2011



Page 3

8_19_2011




To: Madigan Resident

Date: 4/25/2011 4:38:16 PM

Subject: RE:E-cigarettes

Hi Paul, I would be happy to talk with you. I am available until 3 PM today and tomorrow between 10 and 2.

Do any of these times work for you?

Thanks, Kirsten

From: MadiganResident



Subject: E-cigarettes

Kirsten,

I was wondering if you had a moment at some point to discuss ways in which I could assist the e-cigarette issues.

I am available for most of the day today or tomorrow.

Thank you!

Paul Faestel

MadiganPreventiveMedicine resident

Page 1

8_19_2011



From: Madigan Resident


Date: 4/25/2011 5:44:58 PM

Subject: RE:E-cigarettes

So sorry...just got back from a meeting. I have another meeting tomorrow at Madigan.

Would there be a good time on Wednesday?

Thanks,

Paul Faestel



To:Madigan Resident

Subject: RE: E-cigarettes



Thanks, Kirsten





Kirsten,


Page 1

8_19_2011




Thank you!

Paul Faestel


Page 2

8_19_2011



From: Steve Marek


Date: 4/25/2011 4:10:36 PM

Subject: RE: E-cigarettes in the news

Thanks. Might want to share with AC.



To: Steve Marek; 'Gregory Jacoby'; Kirsten Frandsen; Tutrecia Giles; Frank Dibiase; Bruce Rytkonen

Subject: E-cigarettes in the news

I wanted to get a feel for how e-cigarettes were positioned in the news and how other communities are managing the

issue. Here are a few articles I found interesting and relevant to our work here.

SanFrancisco considers banning e-cigarettes

http://abclocal.go.com/kgo/story?section=news/local/san_francisco &id=8089763

Their regulation sounds the same as what we're proposing. As expected, they have comments from e-cigarette

proponents including Ray Story. I expect he'll get involved here as well.

E-cigarettes included in county smoking ban

http://richmondregister.com/localnews/x1281105974/E-cigarettes-included-in-county-smoking-ban

This article is an account of the BOHmeeting in Richmond, KY. It sounds like it got very heated, and although the

regulation passed it was very tense.

The BetterBusiness Bureauwarns against "free" smokeless cigarette promo

http://www.walletpop.com/2011/04/21/better-business-bureau-warns-against-free-smokeless-cigarette/

Direct E-Cig apparently promoted free starter kits, but customers were then charged up to $200. After complaints

were filed in 44 states, BBB issued a warning about the company.

E-Cigarette bosses thrilled to have chain smoking Charlie Sheen on board

http://www.contactmusic.com/news.nsf/story/e-cigarettes-bosses-thrilled-to-have-chain-smoking-charlie-sheen-

Page 1

8_19_2011



onboard_1212866

Charlie Sheen has been using e-cigarettes on stage during his touring show to avoid the smoking in public places

laws. Not exactly the best spokesperson or role model right now.

I'll keep my eyes out to see if anything else comes up that may help us in our planning.

Thanks!

Bridget

Bridget Vandeventer

Communications and CommunityRelationsManager



Page 2

8_19_2011




To: 'StaceyKrum'

Date: 4/25/2011 12:45:16 PM


Thank you so much!

Seeing your name in my inbox makes me happy. J I miss you guys!

Bridget Vandeventer


From: Stacey Krum [mailto:[email protected]]




Hey Mrs. Vandeventer! I saw about your new gig on Facebook. Very cool. I seem to recall the issue of e-cigarettes

coming up before, perhaps an incident in California. Let me check if we specifically address it in our no smoking

policy or not. Will give you a holler on Monday. Have a great weekend!

_____

From: Bridget Vandeventer [mailto:[email protected]]Sent: Friday, April 22, 2011 2:27 PM

To: Stacey Krum



Let me introduce myself to you. I've recently joined the Tacoma-Pierce County Health Department as the

Communications and Community RelationsManager. You may have known me under a different name and in adifferent organization, but I can assure you I am the same chipper, spunky Bridget of tick-tock fame. And I miss you

guys dearly!!!

Page 1

8_19_2011



Aside from catching up, I do have a work issue I'd love to chat with you about. We are exploring proposing

regulation to prohibit the use of e-cigarettes in public places in Pierce County, and I'm interested in knowing if


and wellness and creating a safe and welcoming environment for all your customers, I'd love to hear your

perspective.

Could we jump on a call sometime soon to discuss? Facebook told me that you're volunteering today, so maybe

sometimenext week.

Hope you're well!

Bridget

Bridget Vandeventer




*************************************************************************************



destroy any copies.**************************************************************************************

Page 2

8_19_2011



From: George Hermosillo


Date: 4/25/2011 11:50:30 AM

Subject: RE: Tobacco Harm Reduction Update (4/22/11)

Kirsten,

I did see it and printed it out.

Thank you,

GeorgeHermosillo, B.A; SDVC


Environmental Health:

Physical Activity and Nutrition/ TobaccoPrevention andControl



3629 So. D St.

Tacoma, Wa. 98418

(253) 798-7664

(253) 405-8244 cell

(253 798-6450 fax

email: [email protected]



To: GeorgeHermosillo

Subject: FW: Tobacco Harm Reduction Update (4/22/11)

Hi George, I wanted to point out the Smoke Free Housing Manual to you (link below) in case you haven't seen it.

Page 1

8_19_2011



Thanks, Kirsten

From: Adria Moskowitz


To: Tobacco PC

Subject: FW: Tobacco Harm Reduction Update (4/22/11)

From: Bill Godshall [mailto:[email protected]]


To: Bill Godshall

Subject: Tobacco Harm Reduction Update (4/22/11)

Smokefree Air

CDC issuesHealthy Homes Manual:Smokefree Policies inMultiunit Housing

http://www.cdc.gov/healthyhomes/Healthy_Homes_Manual_WEB.pdf

E-cigarettes

New ZealandMinistry ofHealth tells ParliamentaryCommittee that e-cigaretteusage "is far safer than smoking"

http://www.endsmoking.org.nz/ecigarette.htm

http://www.endsmoking.org.nz/MoH%20on%20ecigs%20etc.pdf

"As the e-cigarette delivers only nicotine in a mist of propylene glycol, without the other 4,000 or so other chemicals

in tobacco smoke, it is far safer than smoking." "The current safety data would therefore suggest that the e-cigarette

poses few risks to people, and is safer than continuing to smoke."

Japanese study finds e-cigarettes reduce cigarette consumption, and may be safe alternative to cigarettes

http://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/seikatsueisei/55/1/55_59/_article

Page 2

8_19_2011



NYC Councilman Vallone proposes ordinance to ban e-cigarette sales to minors and to ban usage of e-cigarettes in

locations were smoking is banned, referred to HealthCommittee.

http://www.gothamgazette.com/blogs/wonkster/2011/04/20/turn-off-that-cigarette/

http://legistar.council.nyc.gov/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=862333&GUID=025C4F6D-8529-4E05-9786-

3942C2DAFD59&Options=ID%7cText%7c&Search=electronic

Tennessee House Agriculture Sub Committee amends bill (HB 1729) to no longer ban e-cigarette sales to adults

(would still ban e-cigarette sales tominors)

http://tnga.granicus.com/MediaPlayer.php?view_id=112&clip_id=4110 (click on HB 1729 at lower left to watch

Cmte meeting)

http://wapp.capitol.tn.gov/apps/BillInfo/Default.aspx?BillNumber=HB1729

ECigarette Users, you ARE smarter (or at least you think you are!)

http://www.ecigarettedirect.co.uk/ashtray-blog/2011/04/ecigarette-users-you-are-smarter-or-at-least-you-think-

you-are.html

Article misrepresents the negligable risks of e-cigarettes and3rdhand smoke, urges doctors to similarlymislead

smokers

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3068875/pdf/ijgm-4-115.pdf

US Tobacco Markets

Altria reported a 6.5% decrease in cigarette volumes for March, 1.3% decrease in smokeless tobacco volumes.

Reynolds reported a 5.2% decrease in cigarette volumes for March, 13.2% increase in smokeless tobacco volumes.

SmokelessTobacco / Dissolvables

CASAA's Call To Action against Oregon bill (HB 5388) that would ban sales of flavored dissolvable tobacco

Page 3

8_19_2011



products

http://www.casaa.org/CTA/article.asp?articleID=149&l=a&p

http://www.leg.state.or.us/11reg/measures/hb3500.dir/hb3588.intro.html

Oregon House Human Services Cmte holds hearing on HB 3588; prohibitionists call smokefree tobacco products

"candy", grossly misrepresent health/safety risks and allege target marketing to youth

http://www.leg.state.or.us/listn/archive/archive.2011s/HHS-201104200800.ram (click on part 2 of 3 clips to begin

HB3588 hearing)

http://www.leg.state.or.us/committees/exhib2web/2011reg/HHS/hhs.htm (HB 3588 hearing exhibits presented)

Testimony by CASAA's Thad Marney opposing HB 3588

http://www.casaa.org/news/article.asp?articleID=152&l=a&p=

Cigarettes

Survey finds 38% of smokers in US, Canada, UK and Australia incorrectly believe nicotine in cigarettes "causes

most cancer", and many smokers incorrectly believe so-called lights andultralights are less hazardous than other

cigarettes.

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03402.x/abstract

http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2011-04/w-sb041111.php

Sen. Richard Blumenthal urges FDA to create untaxed and unregulated black market for menthol cigarettes

http://blumenthal.senate.gov/press/release/index.cfm?id=02245A93-B6F5-4DC1-8251-D2564DEB9A65

FDATobacco/Nicotine Product Regulation

Scott Ballin: Observations on the important role of science in the development of tobacco, nicotine and other

alternative harm reduction products in a "New Era" of product regulation

http://vapersforum.com/showthread.php?p=638782#post638782

Page 4

8_19_2011



YouthSmoking Prevention

Long time opponent of increasing minimum cigarette sales age, Glantz finds/acknowledges that doing so significantly

reduced youth smoking in England

http://thorax.bmj.com/content/early/2011/04/07/thx.2010.154963.abstract

Raise age to buy cigarettes to 21 (note that states can do so, PA did so prior to 2002, UT/AK/AL ban tobacco

sales to minors under 19, but the FSPTCA prohibits the FDA from banning cigarette sales even to 12th grade high

school students)

http://edition.cnn.com/2011/OPINION/04/18/steinberg.smoking.teens/

http://www.ksu.edu.sa/sites/KSUArabic/Research/ncys/Documents/666.pdf

Conflicts of Interest

New report on conflicts of interest among health foundations and for-profit drug and food corporations

http://www.plosmedicine.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pmed.1001020

http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2011-04/plos-clo040611.php

After partnering with drug companies for past decade to promote NRT and to oppose all other smokefree

tobacco/nicotine alternatives for smokers, WHO warns anti-smoking campaigners not to become too close to drugfirms

http://www.bmj.com/content/342/bmj.d2430.short

Drug industry protection policies adopted/recommendedbyWHO(regarding tobacco) include:

WHOTobRegmisrepresents smokeless tobacco risks, urges sales bans and unsubstantiated regulations

http://www.who.int/tobacco/global_interaction/tobreg/brisbane_2002_smokeless/en/index.html

WHO TobReg urges banningelectronic cigarettes, imposing more unsubstantiated regulations for smokeless tobacco

Page 5

8_19_2011



http://www.who.int/tobacco/global_interaction/tobreg/publications/tsr_955/en/index.html

WHO TobReg opposes smokeless tobacco as harm reduction alternative for smokers


WHO urges taxing smokeless tobacco at same rate as far more hazardous cigarettes

http://www.who.int/tobacco/publications/tax_administration/en/index.html

WHO TobReg urges banning flavored tobacco products, but not flavored NRT products

http://www.who.int/tobacco/global_interaction/tobreg/9789241209458.pdf

WHO claimsall tobacco products similarly deadly

http://www.who.int/tobacco/resources/publications/wntd/2006/en/index.html

Tobacco Prohibition

Bhutan: A new criminal class

http://www.kuenselonline.com/2010/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=19124

Bill Godshall

Executive Director

Smokefree Pennsylvania

1926 MonongahelaAvenue

Pittsburgh, PA 15218

412-351-5880

[email protected]

Tounsubscribe from this list, please send a reply stating "unsubscribe".

Page 6

8_19_2011




To: George Hermosillo

Date: 4/25/2011 12:47:02 PM

Subject: RE: Tobacco Harm Reduction Update (4/22/11)

Great!

From: George HermosilloSent: Monday, April 25, 2011 8:51 AMTo: Kirsten FrandsenSubject: RE: Tobacco Harm Reduction Update (4/22/11)

Kirsten,

I did see it and printed it out.

Thank you,

George Hermosillo, B.A; SDVCPrevention Specialist

Environmental Health:

Physical Activity and Nutrition/ Tobacco Prevention and Control



3629 So. D St.

Tacoma, Wa. 98418

(253) 798-7664

(253) 405-8244 cell

(253 798-6450 fax

email: [email protected]

From: Kirsten FrandsenSent: Monday, April 25, 2011 5:51 AMTo: George HermosilloSubject: FW: Tobacco Harm Reduction Update (4/22/11)

Hi George, I wanted to point out the Smoke Free Housing Manual to you (link below) in case you haven’t seen it.

Thanks, Kirsten

From: Adria MoskowitzSent: Friday, April 22, 2011 2:55 PMTo: Tobacco PCSubject: FW: Tobacco Harm Reduction Update (4/22/11)

From: Bill Godshall [mailto:[email protected]]Sent: Friday, April 22, 2011 2:04 PM

To: Bill GodshallSubject: Tobacco Harm Reduction Update (4/22/11)

Smokefree Air

Page 1

8_19_2011



CDC issuesHealthy Homes Manual:Smokefree Policies inMultiunit Housing

http://www.cdc.gov/healthyhomes/Healthy_Homes_Manual_WEB.pdf

E-cigarettes

New ZealandMinistry ofHealth tells ParliamentaryCommittee that e-cigaretteusage "is far safer than smoking"http://www.endsmoking.org.nz/ecigarette.htm

http://www.endsmoking.org.nz/MoH%20on%20ecigs%20etc.pdf

“As the e-cigarette delivers only nicotine in a mist of propylene glycol, without the other 4,000 or so other chemicalsin tobacco smoke, it is far safer than smoking.” "The current safety data would therefore suggest that the e-cigarette

poses few risks to people, and is safer than continuing to smoke."

Japanese study finds e-cigarettes reduce cigarette consumption, and may be safe alternative to cigaretteshttp://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/seikatsueisei/55/1/55_59/_article

NYC Councilman Vallone proposes ordinance to ban e-cigarette sales to minors and to ban usage of e-cigarettes in

locations were smoking is banned, referred to HealthCommittee.http://www.gothamgazette.com/blogs/wonkster/2011/04/20/turn-off-that-cigarette/

http://legistar.council.nyc.gov/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=862333&GUID=025C4F6D-8529-4E05-9786-

3942C2DAFD59&Options=ID%7cText%7c&Search=electronic

Tennessee House Agriculture Sub Committee amends bill (HB 1729) to no longer ban e-cigarette sales to adults

(would still ban e-cigarette sales tominors)

http://tnga.granicus.com/MediaPlayer.php?view_id=112&clip_id=4110 (click on HB 1729 at lower left to watch Cmte

meeting)

http://wapp.capitol.tn.gov/apps/BillInfo/Default.aspx?BillNumber=HB1729

ECigarette Users, you ARE smarter (or at least you think you are!)http://www.ecigarettedirect.co.uk/ashtray-blog/2011/04/ecigarette-users-you-are-smarter-or-at-least-you-think-you-are.html

Article misrepresents the negligable risks of e-cigarettes and3rdhand smoke, urges doctors to similarlymislead

smokershttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3068875/pdf/ijgm-4-115.pdf

US Tobacco Markets

Altria reported a 6.5% decrease in cigarette volumes for March, 1.3% decrease in smokeless tobacco volumes.

Reynolds reported a 5.2% decrease in cigarette volumes for March, 13.2% increase in smokeless tobacco volumes.

Smokeless Tobacco / Dissolvables

CASAA's Call To Action against Oregon bill (HB 5388) that would ban sales of flavored dissolvable tobacco

productshttp://www.casaa.org/CTA/article.asp?articleID=149&l=a&p

http://www.leg.state.or.us/11reg/measures/hb3500.dir/hb3588.intro.html

Oregon House Human Services Cmte holds hearing on HB 3588; prohibitionists call smokefree tobacco products

"candy", grossly misrepresent health/safety risks and allege target marketing to youth

http://www.leg.state.or.us/listn/archive/archive.2011s/HHS-201104200800.ram (click on part 2 of 3 clips to begin HB 3588

hearing) http://www.leg.state.or.us/committees/exhib2web/2011reg/HHS/hhs.htm (HB 3588 hearing exhibits presented)

Testimony by CASAA's Thad Marney opposing HB 3588http://www.casaa.org/news/article.asp?articleID=152&l=a&p=

Page 2

8_19_2011



Cigarettes

Survey finds 38% of smokers in US, Canada, UK and Australia incorrectly believe nicotine in cigarettes "causes

most cancer", and many smokers incorrectly believe so-called lights andultralights are less hazardous than other

cigarettes.http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03402.x/abstract

http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2011-04/w-sb041111.php

Sen. Richard Blumenthal urges FDA to create untaxed and unregulated black market for menthol cigaretteshttp://blumenthal.senate.gov/press/release/index.cfm?id=02245A93-B6F5-4DC1-8251-D2564DEB9A65

FDATobacco/Nicotine Product Regulation

Scott Ballin: Observations on the important role of science in the development of tobacco, nicotine and other

alternative harm reduction products in a "New Era" of product regulationhttp://vapersforum.com/showthread.php?p=638782#post638782

Youth SmokingPrevention

Long time opponent of increasing minimum cigarette sales age, Glantz finds/acknowledges that doing so significantly

reduced youth smoking in Englandhttp://thorax.bmj.com/content/early/2011/04/07/thx.2010.154963.abstract

Raise age to buy cigarettes to 21 (note that states can do so, PA did so prior to 2002, UT/AK/AL ban tobacco

sales to minors under 19, but the FSPTCA prohibits the FDA from banning cigarette sales even to 12th grade high

school students)http://edition.cnn.com/2011/OPINION/04/18/steinberg.smoking.teens/

http://www.ksu.edu.sa/sites/KSUArabic/Research/ncys/Documents/666.pdf

Conflicts of Interest

New report on conflicts of interest among health foundations and for-profit drug and food corporationshttp://www.plosmedicine.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pmed.1001020

http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2011-04/plos-clo040611.php

After partnering with drug companies for past decade to promote NRT and to oppose all other smokefree

tobacco/nicotine alternatives for smokers, WHO warns anti-smoking campaigners not to become too close to drug

firms

http://www.bmj.com/content/342/bmj.d2430.short

Drug industry protection policies adopted/recommendedbyWHO(regarding tobacco) include:

WHOTobReg misrepresents smokeless tobacco risks, urges sales bans and unsubstantiated regulations

http://www.who.int/tobacco/global_interaction/tobreg/brisbane_2002_smokeless/en/index.html

WHO TobReg urges banning electronic cigarettes, imposingmore unsubstantiated regulations for smokeless

tobaccohttp://www.who.int/tobacco/global_interaction/tobreg/publications/tsr_955/en/index.html

WHO TobReg opposes smokeless tobacco as harm reduction alternative for smokers


WHO urges taxing smokeless tobacco at same rate as far more hazardous cigaretteshttp://www.who.int/tobacco/publications/tax_administration/en/index.html

WHO TobReg urges banning flavored tobacco products, but not flavored NRT products

http://www.who.int/tobacco/global_interaction/tobreg/9789241209458.pdf

WHO claimsall tobacco products similarly deadly

Page 3

8_19_2011



http://www.who.int/tobacco/resources/publications/wntd/2006/en/index.html

Tobacco Prohibition

Bhutan: A new criminal classhttp://www.kuenselonline.com/2010/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=19124

Bill Godshall

ExecutiveDirector Smokefree Pennsylvania

1926 Monongahela Avenue

Pittsburgh, PA 15218

412-351-5880

[email protected]

To unsubscribe from this list, please send a reply stating "unsubscribe".

Page 4

8_19_2011





Steve Marek

Frank Dibiase

Kirsten Frandsen

Tutrecia Giles

Bruce Rytkonen

Date: 4/25/2011 6:57:18 PMSubject: RE: Updated E-Cig and SIPP Regulations

Attachments: May 2011 Tobacco Regulations_Key Messages and Q&A.docx

May 2011 Tobacco Regulations_Comm Plan.docx

I've also attached the communications plan with the edits we discussed on Friday. Some of the dates may flex, but I

believe this is what we settled on during the meeting.

I'm also attaching my first draft of key messages and Q&A for both regulations. These are some pretty difficult

questions, so I'd love any feedback you have on these. There are some places where I called out a need for help,

confirmationormore information in the text.

Thanks for your help!

Bridget Vandeventer





Subject: Updated E-Cig and SIPP Regulations

Attached are the updated E-Cig and SIPP regulations that incorporate the comments from Friday's meeting. All prior changes were accepted and the insertions and deletions illustrated in the attached documents reflect Friday's

comments. Unless you have additional changes (or find typos), I would proposed to provide the BOH with clean

versions of these two documents for the May 18th meeting.

Page 1

8_19_2011



Greg

Gregory A. Jacoby



Tacoma, WA 98402

253.627.1181

[email protected]




Page 2

8_19_2011



From: TutreciaGiles


'Gregory Jacoby'

Steve Marek

Frank Dibiase

Kirsten Frandsen

Bruce Rytkonen

Date: 4/25/2011 7:16:00 PMSubject: RE: Updated E-Cig and SIPP Regulations

Bridget,

Great Q & A document. I will look for information to support question #17.-tg

TutreciaGiles,M.Ed.





Direct (253) 798-4727

fax (253) [email protected]



To: 'Gregory Jacoby'; Steve Marek; Frank Dibiase; Kirsten Frandsen; Tutrecia Giles; Bruce Rytkonen

Subject: RE: Updated E-Cig and SIPP Regulations







Page 1

8_19_2011



Bridget Vandeventer






Attached are the updated E-Cig and SIPP regulations that incorporate the comments from Friday's meeting. All prior

changes were accepted and the insertions and deletions illustrated in the attached documents reflect Friday's



Greg

Gregory A. Jacoby



Tacoma, WA 98402

253.627.1181

[email protected]




Page 2

8_19_2011




To: Bruce Rytkonen

Tutrecia Giles

Steve Marek

'Gregory Jacoby'

Bridget Vandeventer

Frank Dibiase

Date: 4/25/2011 4:11:42 PMSubject: Tobacco process and timeline- revised copy 4-25-11


Hi everyone, please see the latest copy of our process/timeline document dated 4-25-11.

Thanks,

Kirsten Frandsen



253.798.3540

[email protected]

Page 1

8_19_2011




To: Steve Marek

Frank Dibiase

Kirsten Frandsen

TutreciaGiles

Bruce Rytkonen

Bridget Vandeventer

Date: 4/25/2011 6:36:58 PMSubject: Updated E-Cig and SIPP Regulations



Attached are the updated E-Cig and SIPP regulations that incorporate the comments from Friday’s meeting. All

prior changes were accepted and the insertions and deletions illustrated in the attached documents reflect Friday’s

comments. Unless you have additional changes (or find typos), I would proposed to provide the BOH with cleanversions of these two documents for the May 18th meeting.

Greg

Gregory A. Jacoby



Tacoma, WA 98402

253.627.1181

[email protected]




Page 1

8_19_2011





Bruce Rytkonen

'Gregory Jacoby'

Frank Dibiase

Steve Marek

Tutrecia Giles

Date: 4/26/2011 6:15:08 PMSubject: Change in Date for Public Meeting- moved to Monday, May 16th from 6-7 PM


Hi everyone,

Due to timing issues, we again need to change the date of our Public Meeting to Monday, May 16th from 6-7 PM.

The auditorium has been booked for this purpose.

Selina, Bridget and I are working to revise the ads for the papers of record.

Tutricia, would you be able to check in with Sebrena about this change?

The new Tobacco Process and Timeline with this change is attached.

Thanks,

Kirsten Frandsen



253.798.3540

[email protected]

Page 1

8_19_2011



From: Steve Marek

To: Anthony Chen

Date: 4/26/2011 1:28:28 PM

Subject: FW: Updated E-Cig and SIPP Regulations



fyi









Greg

Gregory A. Jacoby



Tacoma, WA 98402

253.627.1181

[email protected]


you arenot the intended recipient, any dissemination, distribution or copying is strictlyprohibited. If you think thatyou have received this e-mail message in error, please notify the sender via e-mail or telephone at 253.627.1181.

Page 1

8_19_2011



Page 2

8_19_2011





Date: 4/26/2011 2:47:50 PM

Subject: Online discount of e-cigarettes

Look what I found right after we were talking about this.

LeadingElectronic Cigarette Retailer LaunchesNewSale

Online PR News (press release)

The demand for quality in e-cigarettes is rising, amid various tobacco bans. Smokers who either do not wish to quit,

or find that they cannot, are switching to e-cigarettes. E-cigarettes are a viable answer for many long term smokers

who work in no ...

Bridget Vandeventer




Page 1

8_19_2011




To: TutreciaGiles

Kirsten Frandsen

Date: 4/26/2011 4:47:44 PM

Subject: RE: Speakers/e-cigs

I believe that lots of the people/organizations in the e-cig list can be asked to comment on the SIPP regulation.



To: Bruce Rytkonen; Kirsten Frandsen

Subject: Speakers/e-cigs

Hello,

Here's what I have from our talk yesterday. Please correct or add. I add a few names and ask for some assist from

Sam and Hanna.-tg

E-cigs

1.American Heart Association(Sam)

2. DOH

3. Seattle King County Health Dept

4. Non Tribal Casino (512 American casino)

5. ALAW (Sam)

6. ACS (Sam)

7. E-cigarette expert -(tg Emailed Judy Olsen , out of office til 5/3)

8. LawEnforcement (Hanna, liquor licensing board)

9. Bars and Taverns

10. Ram (waterfront)

11. Clark County

12. Multicare

13. Dr.Waltman-Lori Tanner

14. Tacoma Mall- Steven Heim

Page 1

8_19_2011



15. Applebee's /Red Robin /Denny's (tg. Visited locations in Lakewood 4/25 spoke w/ managers)

16. McDonald's(tg)

17. Youth that smoked cigs and now smokes e-cig

18. Youth that never smoked but now smokes e-cig

19. Tacoma Pierce Transit- Scott Morris and Justin??

20. Pierce County Medical Society- Kirsten will contact director

21. Boys and Girls - Mark Stern (Kirsten has worked w/)

22. Goodwill's Reach- Kurt Miller (Kirsten has worked w/)

23. PSESD-Wendi Miller( meeting w/ her next week)

24. Past complainants ( ie.SIPP)

25. Americans forNon-SmokersRights

26. Tobacco Free Kids

27.Golf Courses-Club house

SIPP

1. Lawenforcement

2. Past complainants

3. Nan Hogan


5. Clean Air..?

TutreciaGiles,M.Ed.


Tacoma-Pierce CountyHealthDepartment3629 So 'D' Street, MS-409


Direct (253) 798-4727

fax (253) 798-6450

Page 2

8_19_2011



[email protected]

Page 3

8_19_2011



From: TutreciaGiles

To: Bruce Rytkonen

Kirsten Frandsen

Date: 4/26/2011 7:36:10 PM


I agree some of the groups can have a dual purpose.-tg

TutreciaGiles,M.Ed.





Direct (253) 798-4727

fax (253) [email protected]



To: TutreciaGiles; Kirsten Frandsen


I believe that lots of the people/organizations in the e-cig list can be asked to comment on the SIPP regulation.





Hello,


Sam and Hanna.-tg

E-cigs

1.American Heart Association(Sam)

2. DOH


Page 1

8_19_2011




5. ALAW (Sam)

6. ACS (Sam)



9. Bars and Taverns


11. Clark County

12. Multicare




16. McDonald's(tg)












SIPP

Page 2

8_19_2011



1. Lawenforcement


3. Nan Hogan


5. Clean Air..?

TutreciaGiles,M.Ed.





Direct (253) 798-4727

fax (253) 798-6450

[email protected]

Page 3

8_19_2011





Steve Marek

Frank Dibiase

Kirsten Frandsen

TutreciaGiles

Bridget Vandeventer

Date: 4/26/2011 11:47:34 AMSubject: RE: Updated E-Cig and SIPP Regulations

Greg.....I have a few minor items:

SIPP

11.B. As we're not including the box diagram with the reinspection fees, I suggest that in the second line that we

delete "the following"

E-CIG

6. As the intent of this paragraph includes both the sale and giving or furnishing of electronic smoking devices, it

seems to me that the title should cover more than just the sale of esd's. So I'd like to suggest that the title be changed

to "Sale or Providing toMinors Prohibited"

10. Enforcement [ I guess I missed that portion of our meeting when it was decided that the penalties for violations

will be listed in this regulation.Anyway.....]

In Subsection B.....as a "seller" may not be someone who gives away or furnishes an esd to a minor, we may want to

delete "on sellers" from B.

Section 12 Reinspection should be changed to be Section 11 (and in 10.C. "12" should be changed to "11"), and the

remaining sections should have their numbersupdated.

Page 1

8_19_2011











Greg

Gregory A. Jacoby



Tacoma, WA 98402

253.627.1181

[email protected]




Page 2

8_19_2011



From: Steve Marek


Frank Dibiase

Kirsten Frandsen

TutreciaGiles

Bruce Rytkonen

Bridget Vandeventer

Date: 4/26/2011 10:41:04 AMSubject: RE: Updated E-Cig and SIPP Regulations

These need to be in final form to go public on Monday correct? I would anticipate sending these out with the BOH

package for the May 18th meeting which means the deadline is Friday. Looked at the timeline and didn't see this in

there. I will share these with Anthony today. Thanks.






changes were accepted and the insertions and deletions illustrated in the attached documents reflect Friday'scomments. Unless you have additional changes (or find typos), I would proposed to provide the BOH with clean


Greg

Gregory A. Jacoby



Tacoma, WA 98402

253.627.1181

[email protected]


Page 1

8_19_2011





Page 2

8_19_2011



From: Steve Marek


Date: 4/26/201110:55:02 AM

Subject: RE: Updated E-Cig and SIPPRegulations

I will call you thisa.m. re this. any timebetter than another?

From:Gregory Jacoby [mailto:[email protected]]

Sent: Monday, April 25, 20113:37PM

To: Steve Marek; Frank Dibiase; KirstenFrandsen; Tutrecia Giles; BruceRytkonen;Bridget Vandeventer

Subject:Updated E-Cig and SIPPRegulations

Attachedare the updated E-Cig and SIPPregulations that incorporate the comments fromFriday'smeeting.All prior

changes were accepted and the insertions and deletions illustrated in theattached documents reflect Friday's

comments. Unlessyou haveadditionalchanges (or find typos), I would proposedtoprovide the BOH withclean

versionsof these two documents for theMay 18thmeeting.

Greg

GregoryA. Jacoby

McGavickGraves,P.S.

1102Broadway, Suite 500

Tacoma, WA98402

253.627.1181

[email protected]

The information contained in thise-mailmessagemay beprivileged, confidential and protected fromdisclosure. If

you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination,distributionorcopying isstrictlyprohibited. If you think that

you have received thise-mailmessage inerror, pleasenotify the sendervia e-mail or telephone at253.627.1181.

Page 1

8_19_2011



From: Brad Costello


Kirsten Frandsen

Date: 4/26/2011 2:05:48 PM

Subject: RE: Website page for Tobacco regs

I can create a web form that would allow people to enter a comment, or additional information if needed, and submit

it via the web to an email address here. I agree with Bridget's suggestion of using a generic name for the email

address; the Help Desk can set up a new Outlook resource for us fairly quickly. With a generic account anyone in

Tobacco could review the comment emails.

I would shy away from using SurveyMonkey only because of records retention requirements.

Brad




Cc:Brad Costello; TutreciaGiles


Thanks for your help Brad!

I'll get you all the copy for the page. We might want to look into some graphics for it, although I'm ok with this being

mainly text withminor formatting.

For feedback, we can go one of three routes. The simplest would just be an email address (directed to Tutrecia, butwe could use an alias like [email protected]) with an ask for people to share their feedback. Another

route would be to set up a SurveyMonkey link, and ask some really targeted questions and some open ended one

for feedback. And then we could combine the two and offer both options.

If we're really serious about collecting feedback and doing something with it, then I'd say go with the last option and

make ourselves as open as possible to hearing what people say. But we have to expect that we'll get feedback from

e-cigarette advocate groups all over the country who will flood the site. And then we have to decide how we

capture, analyze and take or disregard all that feedback.

Let me know what you think.

Page 1

8_19_2011



Bridget Vandeventer





Cc: Brad Costello

Subject: Website page for Tobacco regs

Hi Bridget,

I spoke with Brad Costello in EH who is our website guru. He is happy to help build the webpage we need for the

Tobacco regs by Thursday of this week. I told him that we would get him the content by Thursday AM.

However; I forgot to ask Brad about how to best get input from the public on the proposed regulations through the

website. Brad- are you able to develop a mechanism that would allow comments from the public on the proposed

regs? Bridget- did you have specific ideas on this that you could share with Brad?

Thanks!

Kirsten Frandsen



253.798.3540

[email protected]

Page 2

8_19_2011





Date: 4/26/2011 1:51:48 PM


Thanks for your help Brad!

I'll get you all the copy for the page. We might want to look into some graphics for it, although I'm ok with this being

mainly text withminor formatting.

For feedback, we can go one of three routes. The simplest would just be an email address (directed to Tutrecia, but

we could use an alias like [email protected]) with an ask for people to share their feedback. Another

route would be to set up a SurveyMonkey link, and ask some really targeted questions and some open ended one

for feedback. And then we could combine the two and offer both options.

If we're really serious about collecting feedback and doing something with it, then I'd say go with the last option and

make ourselves as open as possible to hearing what people say. But we have to expect that we'll get feedback from

e-cigarette advocate groups all over the country who will flood the site. And then we have to decide how we

capture, analyze and take or disregard all that feedback.

Let me know what you think.

Bridget Vandeventer





Cc: Brad Costello

Subject: Website page for Tobacco regs

Hi Bridget,

Page 1

8_19_2011



I spoke with Brad Costello in EH who is our website guru. He is happy to help build the webpage we need for the

Tobacco regs by Thursday of this week. I told him that we would get him the content by Thursday AM.

However; I forgot to ask Brad about how to best get input from the public on the proposed regulations through the

website. Brad- are you able to develop a mechanism that would allow comments from the public on the proposed

regs? Bridget- did you have specific ideas on this that you could share with Brad?

Thanks!

Kirsten Frandsen



253.798.3540

[email protected]

Page 2

8_19_2011





Date: 4/27/2011 1:21:54 PM

Subject: FW: GASP #2

More….part 2.

From: Bruce RytkonenSent: Tuesday, April 26, 2011 11:36 AMTo: Kirsten Frandsen; Tutrecia GilesSubject: GASP #2

Here’s the second e-mail from Karen at GASP.

The first link has to do with e-cigs and is fairly short.

The Westlaw Document is their formal SIPP regulation and it’s a monster.

From: Karen Haines [mailto:[email protected]]Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2011 9:54 AMTo: Bruce RytkonenCc: [email protected]; [email protected]: RE: TCPHD ordinance on e-cigarette ban on sale to minors ? - consult

Hi Bruce,

Here is a copy of the NJ State Smokefree Air Act that defines “electronic smoking devices” and bans theuse of electronic smoking devices in public places and workplaces. You can search the 2006 Act for theword “electronic” to see where the Act was changed. http://njgasp.org/sfaa_2010_w-ecigs.pdf

Here is a link to the 2007 Regulations that the NJ State Dept of Health created to help implement the2006 Act. In particular, the definition of an indoor public place refers to volunteers, etc. See NJAC 8:6-1.2 on pg 81. The definition of smoking also includes hookah, as per the 2007 regulations. You cansearch the pdf for “hookah” to read the discussion on that subject.http://njgasp.org/h1_SFAA_regs_Westlaw_Document_13_12_44%5B1%5D.pdf

One of our concerns with e-cigarettes are that the secondhand smoke/vapor has not been scientificallytested and published in peer-review journals, demonstrating their safety. From the perspective of persons who have breathing disabilities, vapors that contain propylene glycol which are a trigger forasthma attacks.

Also, the e-cigarette retailers have a financial interest in the product which explains why they oppose

laws that restrict the use of e-cigs in public places and workplaces, just like the tobacco industry whichopposes smokefree air laws. The FDA stated that they will now be classifying e-cigs as tobaccoproducts, which means that NO e-cig retailer, producer, distributor, etc. should be claiming that theirproduct is used for smoking cessation purposes, since only FDA approved smoking cessation devices canmake that claim.

Lastly, tobacco control advocates and health departments have made great strides in denormalizingsmoking, by passing comprehensive smokefree air laws in public places and workplaces. Amendingsmokefree air laws to include a ban on e-cigarette use helps to continue the denormalizing of smoking orvaping any product that contains nicotine, since nicotine use can negatively affect health conditions,and increases the risk of diabetes.

Please let me know if we can be of further help.

Best regards,Karen Blumenfeld, Esq.Executive DirectorGlobal Advisors on Smokefree Policy (GASP)

Page 1

8_19_2011



7 Cedar St., Suite A, Summit, NJ 07901(908)273-9368 office(908)273-9222 [email protected]

From: Karen Haines [mailto:[email protected]]Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2011 12:01 PMTo: '[email protected]'

Cc: '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'Subject: TCPHD ordinance on e-cigarette ban on sale to minors?

Bruce RytkonenTacoma-Pierce County Health Department

Dear Bruce,

Julie Scholer from the Spokane County health department suggested I email you to find out where theCounty is with regards to a proposal to ban the sale of e-cigarettes to minors, and if you are alsoconsidering a ban on the use of e-cigs in public places and workplaces where smoking is currentlybanned.

Our nonprofit publishes a white paper supporting restrictions on e-cigarettes that lists jurisdictions thathave already banned or are considering a ban on the sale of e-cigs to minors, and use of e-cigs in publicplaces and workplaces. Please feel free to circulate the white paper to your County’s health commissionduring their hearing on the ordinance. http://njgasp.org/E-Cigs_White_Paper.pdf

We provided technical assistance to the NJ Legislature, which was the first state jurisdiction in the USAto ban the use of e-cigs in public places and workplaces where smoking is banned as well as banningtheir sale to minors.

Look forward to hearing from you soon. Please respond using ‘reply all’. Tx.

Karen Haines

Finance and Technology AdministratorGlobal Advisors on Smokefree Policy (GASP)7 Cedar St., Suite A, Summit, NJ 07901(908)273-9368 office(908)273-9222 [email protected]

Page 2

8_19_2011



[email protected]

Page 2

8_19_2011





Frank Dibiase

Bridget Vandeventer

Bruce Rytkonen

TutreciaGiles

Date: 4/27/2011 3:11:40 PM

Subject: FW: Smoking RegsAttachments: TPCHD SIPP regs_GAJ 042711.docx


Fyi.

Thanks, Kirsten

From: Gregory Jacoby [mailto:[email protected]]Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2011 12:02 PMTo: Steve Marek; Kirsten FrandsenSubject: Smoking Regs

Steve and Kirsten,I have attached the local SIPP and E-Cigarette regulations. The documents incorporate the edits that Steve andI discussed yesterday with Dr. Chen.

In addition, I have added a subsection to the enforcement section of both regulations that allows the prevailingparty to recoup its reasonable attorney’s fees and costs in a proceeding before the hearing examiner or any

Page 1

8_19_2011



From: TutreciaGiles

To: Tobacco PC

PAN

Date: 4/27/2011 12:41:26 PM

Subject: FW: Speakers/e-cigs

Helloall,

Below is a list of possible speakers at the upcoming May 18th BOH meeting. At that meeting the following

regulations will be discussed.

1. Smoking in Public Places (SIPP) Definitions( words like, employee, volunteer )

2. Enforcement of SIPP (Fines and fees for violations/reinspection)

3.E-cigs- prohibit sells to >18yrs

4.E-cigs- (SIPP)

5.E-cigs (prohibit coupons and discounted on e-cigs)

Look over the list and if you have any suggestions or contacts , let us know.-Thanks, tg

TutreciaGiles,M.Ed.





Direct (253) 798-4727

fax (253) 798-6450

[email protected]



To: TutreciaGiles; Bruce Rytkonen


Excellent list- Perhaps you can ask others in PAN and Tobacco if they have other orgs/names......

Page 1

8_19_2011



Thanks!





Hello,


Sam and Hanna.-tg

E-cigs

1. American HeartAssociation(Bruce)

2. DOH



5. ALAW (Bruce)

6. ACS (Bruce)



9. Bars and Taverns


11. Clark County

12. Multicare




16. McDonald's(tg)


Page 2

8_19_2011













SIPP

1. Lawenforcement


3. Nan Hogan


5. Clean Air..?

TutreciaGiles,M.Ed.





Direct (253) 798-4727

fax (253) 798-6450

[email protected]

Page 3

8_19_2011




To: MadiganResident

Date: 4/27/2011 12:32:38 PM


Attachments: May 2011 Tobacco Regulations_Key Messages and Q&A.docx

May 2011 Tobacco Regulations_Comm Plan.docx

Hi Paul, just an fyi. We'll most likely discuss at the meeting tomorrow.

Thanks, Kirsten



To: 'Gregory Jacoby'; Steve Marek; Frank Dibiase; Kirsten Frandsen; Tutrecia Giles; Bruce Rytkonen

Subject: RE: Updated E-Cig and SIPP Regulations







Bridget Vandeventer




Page 1

8_19_2011









Greg

Gregory A. Jacoby



Tacoma, WA 98402

253.627.1181

[email protected]




Page 2

8_19_2011



From: TutreciaGiles

To: Samantha Yeun

Kirsten Frandsen

Bruce Rytkonen

Date: 4/27/2011 12:43:38 PM

Subject: RE: E-cigpresentation from Legacy Foundation

Thanks, Sam.

TutreciaGiles,M.Ed.





Direct (253) 798-4727fax (253) 798-6450

[email protected]

From: Samantha Yeun


To: Kirsten Frandsen; TutreciaGiles; Bruce Rytkonen

Subject:E-cig presentation from LegacyFoundation

This is a great presentation that I thought you might like to see.

http://http.earthcache.net/htc-01.media.qualitytech.com/COMP008760MOD1/Legacy/softv.index.htm

Sam

Page 1

8_19_2011




To: MadiganResident

Date: 4/27/2011 12:07:34 PM



Hi Paul, I'm glad to hear of your interest in this work. As mentioned, I am attaching a copy of our latest timeline and

process for the Tobacco policy regs.

Key dates include:

5/16 Public Meeting 6-7 PM TPCHD Auditorium

5/18 Presentation at Board of Health Meeting from 3-5 PM to Board of Health in TPCHD Auditorium

6/1 Board of Health meeting to vote on proposed regulations

We have a meeting scheduled today at 3-3:30 (Steve Marek, our legal counsel and myself) to talk about the regs.

Would you like to be here for the meeting- it will be in Steve's office. Also, we're scheduling a meeting for tomorrow

(Thursday) and it will either be at noon or 3 PM with the team. You will receive a meeting request for that shortly.

Lastly, I will send the regs in a separate email.

Thanks Paul, Kirsten


Sent: Monday, April 25, 2011 2:45 PMTo: Kirsten Frandsen


So sorry...just got back from a meeting. I have another meeting tomorrow at Madigan.

Would there be a good time on Wednesday?

Thanks,

Page 1

8_19_2011



Paul Faestel



To:Madigan Resident




Thanks, Kirsten





Kirsten,



Thank you!

Paul Faestel


Page 2

8_19_2011




To: TutreciaGiles

Bruce Rytkonen

Date: 4/27/2011 3:49:28 PM

Subject: RE: E-cigs Filesmoved

Thank you Tutrecia.

Given that the spreadsheet represents both SIPP and E-Cigs, I moved it to a new folder I created:

G:\LIBSHARE\Tobacco-EH\ADMIN\Board of Health SIPP and E-cigs policy\Testimony

Hope that this is okay.

Thanks, Kirsten

From: Tutrecia GilesSent: Wednesday, April 27, 2011 12:38 PMTo: Kirsten Frandsen; Bruce RytkonenSubject: E-cigs Files moved

I placed all the e-cig docs into the folder created by Kirsten. I placed the names of possible speakers on the

speaker form, including Karen Blumenfeld. I put the initials of the person working on a particular contact. Bruce, I

put your initial next to some, feel free to change, update and add information. -thanks

G:\LIBSHARE\Tobacco-EH\ADMIN\Board of Health SIPP and E-cigs policy

Tutrecia Giles, M.Ed.Prevention SpecialistTacoma-Pierce County Health Department3629 So 'D' Street, MS-409Tacoma, Washington 98418-6813Direct (253) 798-4727fax (253) [email protected]

Page 1

8_19_2011





Date: 4/27/2011 3:51:16 PM

Subject: RE: SmokingRegs

Kirsten…..I’ve reviewed both of the April 27 versions of the e-cig and SIPP regs and they look fine to me.

From: Kirsten FrandsenSent: Wednesday, April 27, 2011 12:12 PMTo: Madigan Resident; Frank Dibiase; Bridget Vandeventer; Bruce Rytkonen; Tutrecia Giles

Subject: FW: Smoking Regs

Fyi.

Thanks, Kirsten

From: Gregory Jacoby [mailto:[email protected]]Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2011 12:02 PMTo: Steve Marek; Kirsten FrandsenSubject: Smoking Regs


In addition, I have added a subsection to the enforcement section of both regulations that allows the prevailingparty to recoup its reasonable attorney’s fees and costs in a proceeding before the hearing examiner or any

Page 1

8_19_2011



subsequent appeals thereof. I have gone back and forth on whether to include such a provision. I have had theissue researched. There is no clear case law on the extent to which a local governmental entity can require theprevailing party to be reimbursed for its attorney fees and costs. But I think a strong case can be made that wehave authority under the delegation of authority in RCW 70.160.080 (local agency may adopt regulationsrequired to implement the SIPP) as well as under the general delegation of police powers under RCW70.05.060. It is also my recollection that Dr. Chen wanted to include such a provision if I believed there waslegal authority to do so. Let’s discuss this further at our 3:00 call.

Greg

Gregory A. Jacoby



Tacoma, WA 98402

253.627.1181

[email protected]

The information contained in this e-mail message may be privileged, confidential and protected from disclosure.

If you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination, distribution or copying is strictly prohibited. If you think

that you have received this e-mail message in error, please notify the sender via e-mail or telephone at

253.627.1181.

Page 2

8_19_2011



In addition, I have added a subsection to the enforcement section of both regulations that allows the prevailing party

to recoup its reasonable attorney's fees and costs in a proceeding before the hearing examiner or any subsequent

appeals thereof. I have gone back and forth on whether to include such a provision. I have had the issue researched.

There is no clear case law on the extent to which a local governmental entity can require the prevailing party to be

reimbursed for its attorney fees and costs. But I think a strong case can be made that we have authority under the

delegation of authority in RCW 70.160.080 (local agency may adopt regulations required to implement the SIPP) as

well as under the general delegation of police powers under RCW 70.05.060. It is also my recollection that Dr.

Chen wanted to include such a provision if I believed there was legal authority to do so. Let's discuss this further at

our 3:00 call.

Greg

Gregory A. Jacoby



Tacoma, WA 98402

253.627.1181

[email protected]




Page 2

8_19_2011




To: TutreciaGiles

Kirsten Frandsen

Date: 4/27/2011 12:43:40 PM


Tutrecia…..I’ll be contacting the folks at the organs instead of Sam.

From: Tutrecia GilesSent: Tuesday, April 26, 2011 1:06 PMTo: Bruce Rytkonen; Kirsten FrandsenSubject: Speakers/e-cigs

Hello,

Here’s what I have from our talk yesterday. Please correct or add. I add a few names and ask for some assist from

Sam and Hanna.-tg

E-cigs

1. American Heart Association(Sam)

2. DOH



5. ALAW (Sam)

6. ACS (Sam)

7. E-cigarette expert –(tg Emailed Judy Olsen , out of office til 5/3)

8. Law Enforcement (Hanna, liquor licensing board)

9. Bars and Taverns


11. Clark County

12. Multicare

13. Dr. Waltman-Lori Tanner


15. Applebee’s /Red Robin /Denny’s (tg. Visited locations in Lakewood 4/25 spoke w/ managers)

16. McDonald’s(tg)





21. Boys and Girls – Mark Stern (Kirsten has worked w/)

22. Goodwill’s Reach- Kurt Miller (Kirsten has worked w/)


Page 1

8_19_2011




25. Americans for Non-Smokers Rights


27. Golf Courses-Club house

SIPP

1. Law enforcement


3. Nan Hogan


5. Clean Air..?


Page 2

8_19_2011




To: TutreciaGiles

Bruce Rytkonen

Date: 4/27/2011 9:52:30 AM


Excellent list- Perhaps you can ask others in PAN and Tobacco if they have other orgs/names……

Thanks!


Hello,

Here’s what I have from our talk yesterday. Please correct or add. I add a few names and ask for some assist from

Sam and Hanna.-tgE-cigs


2. DOH



5. ALAW (Sam)

6. ACS (Sam)



9. Bars and Taverns


11. Clark County

12. Multicare










Page 1

8_19_2011









SIPP

1. Law enforcement


3. Nan Hogan


5. Clean Air..?


Page 2

8_19_2011



From: TutreciaGiles

To: Bruce Rytkonen

Kirsten Frandsen

Date: 4/27/2011 12:44:14 PM


Ok. Great.


From: Bruce RytkonenSent: Wednesday, April 27, 2011 9:44 AMTo: Tutrecia Giles; Kirsten FrandsenSubject: RE: Speakers/e-cigs

Tutrecia…..I’ll be contacting the folks at the organs instead of Sam.


Hello,

Here’s what I have from our talk yesterday. Please correct or add. I add a few names and ask for some assist fromSam and Hanna.-tg

E-cigs


2. DOH



5. ALAW (Sam)

6. ACS (Sam)



9. Bars and Taverns


11. Clark County

12. Multicare



Page 1

8_19_2011
















SIPP

1. Law enforcement


3. Nan Hogan


5. Clean Air..?


Page 2

8_19_2011




To: Steve Marek

Kirsten Frandsen

Date: 4/27/2011 3:01:54 PM

Subject: Smoking Regs




In addition, I have added a subsection to the enforcement section of both regulations that allows the prevailingparty to recoup its reasonable attorney’s fees and costs in a proceeding before the hearing examiner or anysubsequent appeals thereof. I have gone back and forth on whether to include such a provision. I have had theissue researched. There is no clear case law on the extent to which a local governmental entity can require theprevailing party to be reimbursed for its attorney fees and costs. But I think a strong case can be made that wehave authority under the delegation of authority in RCW 70.160.080 (local agency may adopt regulationsrequired to implement the SIPP) as well as under the general delegation of police powers under RCW70.05.060. It is also my recollection that Dr. Chen wanted to include such a provision if I believed there waslegal authority to do so. Let’s discuss this further at our 3:00 call.

Greg

Gregory A. Jacoby



Page 1

8_19_2011



Tacoma, WA 98402

253.627.1181

[email protected]




253.627.1181.

Page 2

8_19_2011





MadiganResident

Date: 4/28/2011 2:45:28 PM

Subject: FW: Smoking Staff Report

Attachments: Staff Report SIPP- Frandsen comments.docx

Hi, as a follow up to our meeting, attached is the Staff Report for SIPP that Greg put together- with my comments.

Thanks, Kirsten



To: 'Gregory Jacoby'; Steve Marek

Subject: RE: Smoking StaffReport

Hi Greg, thanks for putting this together. It looks great.

I do have a few comments/suggestions- I have attached my comments to this email. Are you also planning on doing a

one page report for e-cigs?

Lastly- Steve, I wanted to check in with you about BOH packet materials. I'll plan on touching base with you at EHL

this morning to confirm the other items that will need to go out in the BOH packet.

Thanks, Kirsten


Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2011 5:45 PM

To: Steve Marek; Kirsten Frandsen

Subject: SmokingStaffReport

Steve and Kirsten,

Page 1

8_19_2011



Here is my attempt at a staff report for the SIPP. Tried to keep it short and sweet but welcome your thoughts and

edits.

Gregory A. Jacoby



Tacoma, WA 98402

253.627.1181

[email protected]




Page 2

8_19_2011



From: Brad Costello


Date: 4/28/2011 3:23:24 PM

Subject: RE: iStock Comp Photos

You're right. I didn't even see the positive green symbol behind the e-cigarette. I guess we know where iStock

stands on the issue.

Brad


Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2011 12:18 PM

To: Kirsten Frandsen; Brad Costello

Cc: Madigan Resident


I like that one best too. The one with the cross through it is actually promoting e-cigarettes, I think.

Bridget Vandeventer


From: Kirsten FrandsenSent: Thursday, April 28, 2011 12:12 PM

To:Brad Costello;Bridget Vandeventer



Thanks Brad- I like the one in the middle that compares a regular cigarette to an e-cigarette. How about everyone

else?

Thanks, Kirsten

Page 1

8_19_2011



From: Brad Costello


To:Kirsten Frandsen;Bridget Vandeventer


Subject: iStock Comp Photos

Attached are some iStock comp photos for the website. There is one that is exactly what Kirsten was asking for, but

I thought I would give you a few other options. We can also use one photo for the Home page and a different photo

for the Reg Page if you like more than one. Each photo is about $5.

Brad Costello

Technical Assistant II


3629 South D Street, MS 1058

Tacoma, WA 98418-6813

(253) 798-3808

[email protected]

Page 2

8_19_2011



From: Brad Costello


Bridget Vandeventer

KirstenFrandsen

Date: 4/28/2011 3:22:06 PM


It's unanimous. I will get that picture.

Brad


Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2011 12:20 PMTo:Bridget Vandeventer; Kirsten Frandsen; Brad Costello


I agree-I like the middle one, as well.

Signed,

Madigan resident







Bridget Vandeventer


Page 1

8_19_2011



Page 3

8_19_2011




To: Brad Costello

Date: 4/28/2011 3:31:04 PM


*shakes fist at iStock*

Bridget Vandeventer253-798-2853 | cell: 253-405-6822 | [email protected] | [email protected]

From: Brad CostelloSent: Thursday, April 28, 2011 12:23 PMTo: Bridget VandeventerSubject: RE: iStock Comp Photos

You’re right. I didn’t even see the positive green symbol behind the e-cigarette. I guess we know where iStock

stands on the issue.

Brad

From: Bridget VandeventerSent: Thursday, April 28, 2011 12:18 PMTo: Kirsten Frandsen; Brad CostelloCc: Madigan ResidentSubject: RE: iStock Comp Photos



From: Kirsten FrandsenSent: Thursday, April 28, 2011 12:12 PMTo: Brad Costello; Bridget VandeventerCc: Madigan ResidentSubject: RE: iStock Comp Photos


else?

Thanks, Kirsten

From: Brad CostelloSent: Thursday, April 28, 2011 11:51 AMTo: Kirsten Frandsen; Bridget VandeventerCc: Madigan ResidentSubject: iStock Comp Photos

Attached are some iStock comp photos for the website. There is one that is exactly what Kirsten was asking for,

but I thought I would give you a few other options. We can also use one photo for the Home page and a different

photo for the Reg Page if you like more than one. Each photo is about $5.

Page 1

8_19_2011



Brad Costello




Tacoma, WA 98418-6813

(253) 798-3808

[email protected]

Page 2

8_19_2011




To: KirstenFrandsen

Brad Costello

Date: 4/28/2011 3:17:40 PM



Bridget Vandeventer








else?

Thanks, Kirsten

From: Brad Costello







Page 1

8_19_2011




Brad Costello




Tacoma, WA 98418-6813

(253) 798-3808

[email protected]

Page 2

8_19_2011




To: Brad Costello

Bridget Vandeventer

Date: 4/28/2011 3:12:24 PM



else?

Thanks, Kirsten

From: Brad Costello








Brad Costello




Tacoma, WA 98418-6813

(253) 798-3808

[email protected]

Page 1

8_19_2011




To: Brad Costello

Date: 4/28/2011 3:58:18 PM


Thank you!

From: Brad Costello


To:Madigan Resident; Bridget Vandeventer;Kirsten Frandsen


It's unanimous. I will get that picture.

Brad



To:Bridget Vandeventer; Kirsten Frandsen; Brad CostelloSubject: RE: iStock Comp Photos


Signed,

Madigan resident







Page 1

8_19_2011



Bridget Vandeventer








else?

Thanks, Kirsten

From: Brad Costello








Brad Costello



Page 2

8_19_2011




Tacoma, WA 98418-6813

(253) 798-3808

[email protected]

Page 3

8_19_2011





Bridget Vandeventer

Brad Costello

Date: 4/28/2011 3:21:50 PM


Thanks all- Brad, if you are in agreement as well, let's use this one as our primary pic.



To:Bridget Vandeventer; Kirsten Frandsen; Brad Costello



Signed,

Madigan resident







Bridget Vandeventer


Page 1

8_19_2011





Date: 4/28/2011 3:59:24 PM


Ahhh, you have a funny side too! Glad to hear it.



To:Bridget Vandeventer; Kirsten Frandsen; Brad Costello



Signed,

Madigan resident

From: Bridget Vandeventer Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2011 12:18 PM





Bridget Vandeventer





Page 1

8_19_2011





KirstenFrandsen

Brad Costello

Date: 4/28/2011 3:20:14 PM



Signed,

Madigan resident







Bridget Vandeventer








else?

Page 1

8_19_2011



Thanks, Kirsten

From: Brad Costello








Brad Costello




Tacoma, WA 98418-6813

(253) 798-3808

[email protected]

Page 2

8_19_2011





Date: 4/28/2011 11:57:10 AM

Subject: RE: Regulations for SIPP and E-cigs from other counties

I'll be working on these items.



To: Bruce Rytkonen

Cc: Tutrecia Giles

Subject: Regulations for SIPP and E-cigs from other counties

HiBruce,

Yesterday- it again came up that a BOH member wants to see a regulation/resolution. Yikes, these requests keep

coming in. Anyhow, the latest request is by Dick Muri- he would like to see Spokane's E-Cig Resolution. Would you

be able to locate and send that to me asap?

Also, if you would be willing- it would be great if you could put all of the other counties' regs/resolutions in our

shared drive that we're using for the Tobacco policy process. Perhaps you could add a new folder called something

like "Tobacco regs and resolutions from other jurisdictions". Would you be willing and able to do that today? J

Muchas Gracious! Kirsten

Page 1

8_19_2011




To: Bruce Rytkonen

Date: 4/28/2011 2:57:48 PM


Thanks!

From: Bruce RytkonenSent: Thursday, April 28, 2011 8:57 AMTo: Kirsten FrandsenCc: Tutrecia GilesSubject: RE: Regulations for SIPP and E-cigs from other counties

I’ll be working on these items.

From: Kirsten FrandsenSent: Thursday, April 28, 2011 6:10 AMTo: Bruce Rytkonen

Cc: Tutrecia GilesSubject: Regulations for SIPP and E-cigs from other counties

Hi Bruce,


coming in. Anyhow, the latest request is by Dick Muri- he would like to see Spokane’s E-Cig Resolution. Would

you be able to locate and send that to me asap?

Also, if you would be willing- it would be great if you could put all of the other counties’ regs/resolutions in our

shared drive that we’re using for the Tobacco policy process. Perhaps you could add a new folder called

something like “Tobacco regs and resolutions from other jurisdictions”. Would you be willing and able to do that

today? J


Page 1

8_19_2011



From: TutreciaGiles

To: Bruce Rytkonen

Kirsten Frandsen

Date: 4/28/2011 12:00:02 PM


Ok. I’ll keep working on the speakers list. -tg


From: Bruce RytkonenSent: Thursday, April 28, 2011 8:57 AMTo: Kirsten FrandsenCc: Tutrecia GilesSubject: RE: Regulations for SIPP and E-cigs from other counties

I’ll be working on these items.

From: Kirsten FrandsenSent: Thursday, April 28, 2011 6:10 AMTo: Bruce RytkonenCc: Tutrecia Giles

Subject: Regulations for SIPP and E-cigs from other counties

Hi Bruce,


coming in. Anyhow, the latest request is by Dick Muri- he would like to see Spokane’s E-Cig Resolution. Would

you be able to locate and send that to me asap?

Also, if you would be willing- it would be great if you could put all of the other counties’ regs/resolutions in our

shared drive that we’re using for the Tobacco policy process. Perhaps you could add a new folder called

something like “Tobacco regs and resolutions from other jurisdictions”. Would you be willing and able to do that

today? J


Page 1

8_19_2011





Steve Marek

Date: 4/28/2011 9:04:02 AM

Subject: RE: Smoking Staff Report

Attachments: Staff Report SIPP- Frandsen comments.docx






Thanks, Kirsten





Steve and Kirsten,

Here is my attempt at a staff report for the SIPP. Tried to keep it short and sweet but welcome your thoughts andedits.

Gregory A. Jacoby



Tacoma, WA 98402

253.627.1181

Page 1

8_19_2011



[email protected]




Page 2

8_19_2011



From: Steve Marek


'Gregory Jacoby'

Date: 4/28/2011 10:57:14 AM


I took a quick look at this and am ok with it with the additional comments from Kirsten. Only comment is to add "of"

to the 3rd paragraph #2 between some and its. Might want to have Bridgett take a look at the next version.



To: 'Gregory Jacoby'; Steve Marek







Thanks, Kirsten





Steve and Kirsten,

Here is my attempt at a staff report for the SIPP. Tried to keep it short and sweet but welcome your thoughts and

edits.

Page 1

8_19_2011



Gregory A. Jacoby



Tacoma, WA 98402

253.627.1181

[email protected]




Page 2

8_19_2011




To: 'Zilar, Christopher'

Date: 4/28/2011 4:11:18 PM

Subject: RE: SpokaneRegHealthDistrict Regulations (?)

ThanksChris

From: Zilar, Christopher [mailto:[email protected]]


To: Bruce Rytkonen; Scholer, Julie

Cc:Kirsten Frandsen; 'MichelleWolkey'; Panerio, Krista

Subject:RE: Spokane Reg HealthDistrict Regulations (?)

I believe you are correct. My recollection is that we took the position that RCW 70.160 granted the authority, so

there was no need for a formal local board of health resolution to authorize us to enforce SIPP. RCW

70.160.070(3) states "Local health departments shall enforce . . ."

I have included our agency attorney on this email in case she remembers it differently.

ChristopherP. Zilar, Program Manager

Breast, Cervical and Colon Health

TobaccoPrevention andControl

Spokane Regional Health District

1101 W. College Ave., Suite 401

Spokane, WA 99201

(509) 324-1538

mailto:[email protected]

www.srhd.org

Public Health - Alwaysworking for a safer and healthier community

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email and any attachments are for the sole use of the intended recipient(s)

and maycontainproprietary, confidential, or privileged information.Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or

distribution is prohibited and may be a violation of law. If you are not the intended recipient or a person responsible

for delivering this message to an intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of

Page 1

8_19_2011



the original message.

From: Bruce Rytkonen [mailto:[email protected]]


To: Scholer, Julie; Zilar, Christopher

Cc:Kirsten Frandsen

Subject: Spokane RegHealthDistrict Regulations (?)

Chris and Julie.......in the past you've provided to me your July 19, 2010 Draft Enforcement Procedure for SIPP and

your Resolution 10-05 for e-cigs, and other e-cigs regs as adopted by several governing/municipal bodies in

Spokane County. Thank you very much.

I've poked around as to what other LHJ's have done with regards to adopting SIPP 70.160 as a local ordinance or

regulation and there's a handful that have formally adopted their on SIPP.

I don't believe that you have done that and your Enforcement Procedure serves as your authorization to enforce

RCW 70.160. Is that correct.....or has your Board provided some other form of authorization? Thanks again.

Julie.....thanks for letting Karen Blumenfeld from GASP know about our work here in Pierce County. She has

provided me with a ton of information.

*************************************************************************************



destroy any copies.

**************************************************************************************

Page 2

8_19_2011



From: Michelle Fossum <[email protected]>

To: Zilar, Christopher

Bruce Rytkonen

Scholer, Julie

Date: 4/28/2011 6:28:06 PM

Subject: RE: SpokaneRegHealthDistrict Regulations (?)

My recollection is the same as that set forth by Chris.

Michelle

_____

From: Zilar, Christopher [mailto:[email protected]]


To: 'Bruce Rytkonen'; Scholer, Julie

Cc:Kirsten Frandsen; Michelle Fossum;Panerio, Krista

Subject:RE: Spokane Reg HealthDistrict Regulations (?)

I believe you are correct. My recollection is that we took the position that RCW 70.160 granted the authority, so

there was no need for a formal local board of health resolution to authorize us to enforce SIPP. RCW70.160.070(3) states “Local health departments shall enforce . . .”

I have included our agency attorney on this email in case she remembers it differently.

ChristopherP. Zilar, Program Manager

Breast, Cervical and Colon Health

TobaccoPrevention andControl

Spokane Regional Health District

1101 W. College Ave., Suite 401

Spokane, WA 99201

(509) 324-1538

mailto:[email protected]

Page 1

8_19_2011



www.srhd.org

Public Health - Alwaysworking for a safer and healthier community

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email and any attachments are for the sole use of the intended recipient(s)

and maycontainproprietary, confidential, or privileged information.Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or

distribution is prohibited and may be a violation of law. If you are not the intended recipient or a person responsible

for delivering this message to an intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of

the original message.

From: Bruce Rytkonen [mailto:[email protected]]


To: Scholer, Julie; Zilar, Christopher

Cc:Kirsten Frandsen

Subject: Spokane RegHealthDistrict Regulations (?)

Chris and Julie…….in the past you’ve provided to me your July 19, 2010 Draft Enforcement Procedure for SIPP

and your Resolution 10-05 for e-cigs, and other e-cigs regs as adopted by several governing/municipal bodies in


I’ve poked around as to what other LHJ’s have done with regards to adopting SIPP 70.160 as a local ordinance or

regulation and there’s a handful that have formally adopted their on SIPP.

I don’t believe that you have done that and your Enforcement Procedure serves as your authorization to enforce

RCW 70.160. Is that correct…..or has your Board provided some other form of authorization? Thanks again.

Julie…..thanks for letting Karen Blumenfeld from GASP know about our work here in Pierce County. She has


*************************************************************************************



destroy any copies.

**************************************************************************************

Page 2

8_19_2011



Chris and Julie…….in the past you’ve provided to me your July 19, 2010 Draft Enforcement Procedure for SIPP

and your Resolution 10-05 for e-cigs, and other e-cigs regs as adopted by several governing/municipal bodies in


I’ve poked around as to what other LHJ’s have done with regards to adopting SIPP 70.160 as a local ordinance or

regulation and there’s a handful that have formally adopted their on SIPP.

I don’t believe that you have done that and your Enforcement Procedure serves as your authorization to enforce

RCW 70.160. Is that correct…..or has your Board provided some other form of authorization? Thanks again.

Julie…..thanks for letting Karen Blumenfeld from GASP know about our work here in Pierce County. She has


*************************************************************************************



destroy any copies.

**************************************************************************************

Page 2

8_19_2011




To: Anthony Chen

Date: 4/29/2011 1:17:34PM

Subject: BOHmember tospeak tomedia insupport of tobacco regulations

Hi Anthony,

I washoping tograba coupleminuteswithyoutoday but after talking withTawanaabout your schedule, it looks like

thatwon't happen.

We areposting the regulationsonthe websiteonWednesday,andwill pitch a storytothe TNT that same dayor

possiblyTuesday tostart the conversationand haveanearly influence onthe story. I'vebeendoing a lot of research

onother LHJsaroundthe country thathaveproposedsimilar regulation. One important element of their media

coveragehas beenpublicsupport and participation in the mediabyat least one BOHmember. I'd like to identify

which BOHmember will speak to themedia about e-cigarettesand the proposedregulation. In talking withSteve,

hesuggested thatRickTalbert might beour bestbet.Other possibleoptions could beVictoriaWoodardsorJake

Fey.And if she'd bewilling, I think thatPat McCarthywould beespecially impactful.

Ifwedonot have aBOHmember identified, we run the riskofa story comingout that pits the HealthDepartment

against the BOH chair,which I believemay weakenour caseinthe public'seye.

Tawana isworking onschedulingyourmeeting withRickTalbert,and I believe you're talking toPat McCarthy

today. Asyouspeakwith them, ifyou feel theyare insupport of the regulation,would youask if theywould be

willing toworkwith the media on this? Specificallywe'll need themtoparticipate ina curtain raiserstory nextweek,

and thenlikelybequotedin the press release weissue if the regulationpasses.

ThanksAnthony.Let me knowifyou haveany questions onthisorother portionsofour communicationsplan

surrounding theregulations.

Bridget

Bridget Vandeventer

Communications andCommunity RelationsManager

Page 1

8_19_2011





Page 2

8_19_2011




To: Adria Moskowitz

Kirsten Frandsen

Date: 4/29/2011 6:01:48 PM

Subject: E-cig BOH doc

Attachments: ecig1.docx

Hello Adria,

Take a look at this doc. The ecig picture needs to be added. I was thinking it should be placed after first paragraph.

let me know.- thanks,tg

_____



To: Tutrecia Giles

Cc: Brad Costello

Subject: RE: E-cig photo

Hi Tutrecia, thanks. If you can re-create and send to Adria for formatting, that would work. The challenge is that we

need it all done by today :/

Brad Costello recently purchased an image of an e-cigarette (compared to a reg cigarette) off of I-Stock photo. I

think this image would work fine or we can call ALF and ask if we can use their image.

Brad- can you send Tutricia the image?

Thanks!




Page 1

8_19_2011



Subject: Re: E-cig photo

Hello Kirsten

I can create a doc similar to ALF's (using ALF's photo). Bridget expressed some concern about copyrights of the

photos. That's why I sent you the documents in their original form, but it can be done-tg

_____


Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 17:11:01 +0000

To: Tutrecia Giles

Cc:Bruce Rytkonen


HiTutricia, thanks for sending these.

I like theALF overview as this is what I think Steve is looking for. However; it was developed 9/09 and outdated.

The FDA document is informative but it really speaks to the dangers- rather than give an overview of what they are.

Is it possible to re-create the ALF document and for us to update it with the newest information (esp. the FDA stuff)

unless we can find another one pager that is an overview and up to date.

Thanks, Kirsten




Cc:Bruce Rytkonen

Subject: E-cig photo

Kirsten,

Page 2

8_19_2011



Here are two photos. Both references are reputable sources.

1. FDA

2.The AmericanLegacyFoundation. The national, independent public health Foundation was created in 1999 out of

the landmark Master Settlement Agreement (MSA) between the tobacco industry, 46 state governments and five

U.S. territories. It is located in Washington, D.C. and is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization.

TutreciaGiles,M.Ed.





Direct (253) 798-4727

fax (253) 798-6450

[email protected]

Page 3

8_19_2011




To: Jamie-Diane Pollock

Date: 4/29/2011 2:08:50 PM

Subject: FW: Smoking Regulations& StaffReports

Attachments: TPCHD SIPP regs_GAJ FINAL.docx

TPCHD E-Cig regs_Final.docx

Staff Report SIPP Final.docx

Staff Report E-CigsFinal.docx

Hi, I have a very special and important request…. Would you be willing to be the final editor for these documents?J I need to have them by today.

I’ll tell you more about this in the car on the way to our meeting.

Thanks, Kirsten

From: Gregory Jacoby [mailto:[email protected]]Sent: Friday, April 29, 2011 9:34 AMTo: Steve Marek; Frank Dibiase; Kirsten Frandsen; Bruce Rytkonen; Bridget Vandeventer; Tutrecia Giles; Madigan ResidentSubject: Smoking Regulations & Staff Reports

All,I have attached what I believe to be the final versions of the following documents:

Chapter 8, Smoking in Public Places

Chapter 9, Restrictions on Sale, Use, and Availability of Electronic Smoking Devices and Unregulated

Page 1

8_19_2011



Nicotine Delivery Products

Staff Report for Chapter 8 (Local SIPP)

Staff Report for Chapter 9 (E-cigarettes)

I think you have all seen these versions before with the exception of the staff report for e-cigarettes. Please letme know if you have any final comments or edits prior to noon today. Otherwise, Kirsten, I think these are readfor the Board’s May 18th meeting materials.

Gregory A. Jacoby



Tacoma, WA 98402

253.627.1181

[email protected]




253.627.1181.

Page 2

8_19_2011



From: Anthony Chen

To: Tawana Bellamy

Date: 4/29/2011 5:50:20 PM




From: Anthony Chen


To: Connie Perry


Connie,

I am sorry, but I forgot that I had a meeting this morning with Pat to discuss these regulations and did not print them

out. I will not be in the office before our meeting at 1000. Could I bother you to print two copies of these two

documents?

Thanks!

Anthony

_____

From: Steve Marek


To: AnthonyChen


fyi






Page 1

8_19_2011






Greg

Gregory A. Jacoby



Tacoma, WA 98402

253.627.1181

[email protected]




Page 2

8_19_2011




To: Cindy Leingang ([email protected])

Date: 4/29/2011 5:54:46 PM




Hi Cindy,

Cindy DeGrosse is out today; would you print these documents and get them to Council Member Fey for this

conference call with Dr. Chen?

Thanks,

Tawana Bellamy




Phone: (253) 798-2899


From: Anthony Chen


To: TawanaBellamy


Page 1

8_19_2011



From: Anthony Chen


Date: 4/29/2011 1:22:44 PM

Subject: Re: BOH member to speak to media in support of tobacco regulations

Page 1

8_19_2011




To: Anthony Chen

Date: 4/29/2011 1:23:28 PM

Subject: RE: BOH member to speak to media in support of tobacco regulations

Thatâ€™s great, thank you. It might actually be something Pat would want to do; gives her some more media time

right as sheâ€™s launching her re-election campaign.


From: Anthony ChenSent: Friday, April 29, 2011 10:23 AMTo: Bridget VandeventerSubject: Re: BOH member to speak to media in support of tobacco regulations

I will ask. Waiting to see Pat and have call with Jake later today.

AC

From: Bridget VandeventerSent: Friday, April 29, 2011 10:17 AMTo: Anthony ChenCc: Kirsten Frandsen; Steve Marek Subject: BOH member to speak to media in support of tobacco regulations

Hi Anthony,

I was hoping to grab a couple minutes with you today but after talking with Tawana about your schedule, it looks

like that wonâ€™t happen.

We are posting the regulations on the website on Wednesday, and will pitch a story to the TNT that same day or

possibly Tuesday to start the conversation and have an early influence on the story. Iâ€™ve been doing a lot of

research on other LHJs around the country that have proposed similar regulation. One important element of their

media coverage has been public support and participation in the media by at least one BOH member. Iâ€™d like

to identify which BOH member will speak to the media about e-cigarettes and the proposed regulation. In talking

with Steve, he suggested that Rick Talbert might be our best bet. Other possible options could be Victoria

Woodards or Jake Fey. And if sheâ€™d be willing, I think that Pat McCarthy would be especially impactful.

If we do not have a BOH member identified, we run the risk of a story coming out that pits the Health Department

against the BOH chair, which I believe may weaken our case in the publicâ€™s eye.

Tawana is working on scheduling your meeting with Rick Talbert, and I believe youâ€™re talking to Pat McCarthy

today. As you speak with them, if you feel they are in support of the regulation, would you ask if they would be

willing to work with the media on this? Specifically weâ€™ll need them to participate in a curtain raiser story next

week, and then likely be quoted in the press release we issue if the regulation passes.

Thanks Anthony. Let me know if you have any questions on this or other portions of our communications plan

surrounding the regulations.

Bridget

Bridget VandeventerCommunications and Community RelationsManager

Page 1

8_19_2011



Tacoma-Pierce County Health Department253-798-2853 | cell: 253-405-6822 | [email protected] | [email protected]

Page 2

8_19_2011





Date: 4/29/2011 2:18:36 PM


Good news: we got Pat McCarthy!

Bridget Vandeventer




To: AnthonyChen


That’s great, thank you. It might actually be something Pat would want to do; gives her some more media time rightas she’s launching her re-election campaign.

Bridget Vandeventer


From: Anthony Chen





AC

Page 1

8_19_2011





To: AnthonyChen

Cc: Kirsten Frandsen; Steve Marek

Subject: BOH member to speak to media in support of tobacco regulations

Hi Anthony,

I was hoping to grab a couple minutes with you today but after talking with Tawana about your schedule, it looks like

that won’t happen.


possibly Tuesday to start the conversation and have an early influence on the story. I’ve been doing a lot of research

on other LHJs around the country that have proposed similar regulation. One important element of their media

coverage has been public support and participation in the media by at least one BOH member. I’d like to identify

which BOH member will speak to the media about e-cigarettes and the proposed regulation. In talking with Steve,

he suggested that Rick Talbert might be our best bet. Other possible options could be Victoria Woodards or Jake

Fey. And if she’d be willing, I think that Pat McCarthy would be especially impactful.


against the BOH chair, which I believe may weaken our case in the public’s eye.

Tawana is working on scheduling your meeting with Rick Talbert, and I believe you’re talking to Pat McCarthy


willing to work with the media on this? Specifically we’ll need them to participate in a curtain raiser story next week,

and then likely be quoted in the press release we issue if the regulation passes.



Bridget

Bridget Vandeventer

Page 2

8_19_2011






Page 3

8_19_2011





Date: 4/29/2011 5:41:58 PM


Wow, you’re awesome J

Thanks so much! Woo-hoo!

Do you want to let the team know?

K





Good news: we got Pat McCarthy!

Bridget Vandeventer




To: AnthonyChen


That’s great, thank you. It might actually be something Pat would want to do; gives her some more media time right

as she’s launching her re-election campaign.

Page 1

8_19_2011



Bridget Vandeventer


From: Anthony Chen





AC



To: AnthonyChen

Cc: Kirsten Frandsen; Steve Marek

Subject: BOH member to speak to media in support of tobacco regulations

Hi Anthony,

I was hoping to grab a couple minutes with you today but after talking with Tawana about your schedule, it looks like

that won’t happen.


possibly Tuesday to start the conversation and have an early influence on the story. I’ve been doing a lot of research

on other LHJs around the country that have proposed similar regulation. One important element of their media

coverage has been public support and participation in the media by at least one BOH member. I’d like to identify

which BOH member will speak to the media about e-cigarettes and the proposed regulation. In talking with Steve,

he suggested that Rick Talbert might be our best bet. Other possible options could be Victoria Woodards or Jake

Fey. And if she’d be willing, I think that Pat McCarthy would be especially impactful.


against the BOH chair, which I believe may weaken our case in the public’s eye.

Page 2

8_19_2011



Tawana is working on scheduling your meeting with Rick Talbert, and I believe you’re talking to Pat McCarthy


willing to work with the media on this? Specifically we’ll need them to participate in a curtain raiser story next week,

and then likely be quoted in the press release we issue if the regulation passes.



Bridget

Bridget Vandeventer




Page 3

8_19_2011



From: Brad Costello


TutreciaGiles

Date: 4/29/2011 2:13:00 PM


Tutrecia,

The photo is attached.

Brad



To: Tutrecia Giles

Cc: Brad Costello


Hi Tutrecia, thanks. If you can re-create and send to Adria for formatting, that would work. The challenge is that weneed it all done by today :/




Thanks!



To: Kirsten FrandsenSubject: Re: E-cig photo

Page 1

8_19_2011



Hello Kirsten



_____


Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 17:11:01 +0000

To: Tutrecia Giles

Cc:Bruce Rytkonen







Thanks, Kirsten




Cc:Bruce Rytkonen


Kirsten,


1. FDA

Page 2

8_19_2011






TutreciaGiles,M.Ed.





Direct (253) 798-4727

fax (253) 798-6450

[email protected]

Page 3

8_19_2011




To: Tutrecia Giles

Date: 4/29/2011 1:11:02 PM

Subject: RE: E-cigphoto

Hi Tutricia, thanks for sending these.


The FDA document is informative but it really speaks to the dangers- rather than give an overview of what they

are.

Is it possible to re-create the ALF document and for us to update it with the newest information (esp. the FDA

stuff) unless we can find another one pager that is an overview and up to date.

Thanks, Kirsten


Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2011 4:38 PMTo: Kirsten FrandsenCc: Bruce RytkonenSubject: E-cig photo

Kirsten,


1. FDA

2.The American Legacy Foundation. The national, independent public health Foundation was created in

1999 out of the landmark Master Settlement Agreement (MSA) between the tobacco industry, 46 stategovernments and five U.S. territories. It is located in Washington, D.C. and is a 501(c)(3) non-profit

organization.


Page 1

8_19_2011




To: Tutrecia Giles

Date: 4/29/2011 2:11:06 PM

Subject: RE: E-cigphoto






Thanks!





Hello Kirsten



_____


Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 17:11:01 +0000

To: Tutrecia Giles

Cc:Bruce Rytkonen



Page 1

8_19_2011







Thanks, Kirsten




Cc:Bruce Rytkonen


Kirsten,


1. FDA




TutreciaGiles,M.Ed.





Direct (253) 798-4727

fax (253) 798-6450

[email protected]

Page 2

8_19_2011



From: TutreciaGiles


Date: 4/29/2011 2:41:48 PM


Will do.-tg

_____


Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 18:11:04 +0000

To: Tutrecia Giles

Cc: Brad Costello







Thanks!





Hello Kirsten



_____


Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 17:11:01 +0000

To: Tutrecia Giles

Page 1

8_19_2011



Cc:Bruce Rytkonen







Thanks, Kirsten




Cc:Bruce Rytkonen


Kirsten,


1. FDA




TutreciaGiles,M.Ed.




Page 2

8_19_2011




Direct (253) 798-4727

fax (253) 798-6450

[email protected]

Page 3

8_19_2011



From: TutreciaGiles

To: Brad Costello

Date: 4/29/2011 2:41:14 PM


Thanks.

_____

From: Brad Costello

Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 18:13:00 +0000

To: Kirsten Frandsen; TutreciaGiles


Tutrecia,

The photo is attached.

Brad


To: Tutrecia Giles

Cc: Brad Costello







Thanks!

Page 1

8_19_2011







Hello Kirsten



_____


Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 17:11:01 +0000

To: Tutrecia Giles

Cc:Bruce Rytkonen







Thanks, Kirsten

From: Tutrecia GilesSent: Thursday, April 28, 2011 4:38 PM


Cc:Bruce Rytkonen


Page 2

8_19_2011



Kirsten,


1. FDA




TutreciaGiles,M.Ed.





Direct (253) 798-4727

fax (253) 798-6450

[email protected]

Page 3

8_19_2011



From: TutreciaGiles


Date: 4/29/2011 2:03:24 PM


Hello Kirsten



_____


Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 17:11:01 +0000

To: Tutrecia Giles

Cc:Bruce Rytkonen







Thanks, Kirsten




Cc:Bruce Rytkonen


Kirsten,


1. FDA

Page 1

8_19_2011






TutreciaGiles,M.Ed.





Direct (253) 798-4727

fax (253) 798-6450

[email protected]

Page 2

8_19_2011




To: TutreciaGiles

Frank Dibiase

Bruce Rytkonen

Madigan Resident

Steve Marek

'Gregory Jacoby'

Date: 4/29/2011 9:17:30 AMSubject: RE: Smoke vs.Vapor defintion

Thank you Tutrecia- I would support the use of the word "smoke" rather than vapor when referring to e-cigs.

Others?

Thanks, Kirsten

_____



To: Kirsten Frandsen; Frank Dibiase; Bruce Rytkonen; Madigan Resident; Steve Marek; 'Gregory Jacoby'

Subject: Smoke vs.Vapor defintion

Helloall,

Here are both definitions from the Webster’s online dictionary. It states that smoke can be “fume or vapor often

resulting from the action of heat on moisture. “ I believe it’s our option to use the word “smoke’ and not vapor. I

recommend we use the word “smoke”, it is supported by the definition. Using the word “vapor” only supports the

concept that it’s totally w/ out harm or any chemicals-Tutrecia

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/smoke

Definition of SMOKE

1

a : the gaseous products of burning materials especially of organic origin made visible by the presence of small

particles of carbon b : a suspension of particles in a gas

2

a : a mass or column of smoke b : smudge

Page 1

8_19_2011



3

: fume or vapor often resulting from the action of heat on moisture

4

: something of little substance, permanence, or value

5

: something that obscures

6

a (1) : something (as a cigarette) to smoke (2) : marijuana 2 b : an act of smoking tobacco; especially : a smoking

break

7

a : a pale blue b : any of the colors of smoke

8

: pitches that are fastballs

Definition of VAPOR

1

: diffused matter (as smoke or fog) suspended floating in the air and impairing its transparency

2

a : a substance in the gaseous state as distinguished from the liquid or solid state b : a substance (as gasoline, alcohol,

mercury, or benzoin) vaporized for industrial, therapeutic, ormilitaryuses; also : a mixture (as the explosive mixture in

an internal combustion engine) of such a vapor with air

3

a : something unsubstantial or transitory : phantasm b : a foolish or fanciful idea

4

plural

TutreciaGiles,M.Ed.


Page 2

8_19_2011






Direct (253) 798-4727

fax (253) 798-6450

[email protected]

Page 3

8_19_2011



From: Brad Costello


Date: 4/29/2011 2:28:46 PM

Subject: RE: Smoking Regulations& Staff Reports

Let me know when the review is completed and I will set up the webpage.

Brad



To: Kirsten Frandsen; Gregory Jacoby; Steve Marek; Frank Dibiase; Bruce Rytkonen; Tutrecia Giles; Madigan

Resident

Cc: Brad Costello

Subject: RE: Smoking Regulations& StaffReports

I've drafted the website copy and uploaded it to the Sharepoint site for review. Kirsten-can you take a hard edit on

this? Anyone else is welcome at it too. It's in the Communications folder> May 2011_website copy.

Brad: the sections are where I'll need to work with you to load the regulations and the feedback form links.

Thanks!

Bridget Vandeventer




To: Gregory Jacoby; Steve Marek;Frank Dibiase; Bruce Rytkonen; Bridget Vandeventer; TutreciaGiles;Madigan

Resident

Page 1

8_19_2011




Excellent- thankyou Greg.

All, I will upload these documents into Sharepoint. However, before I do; I will ask one staff to do a final edit-

punctuation and format only (no content changes).

Thanks, Kirsten



To: SteveMarek;FrankDibiase; Kirsten Frandsen; Bruce Rytkonen; Bridget Vandeventer; TutreciaGiles;Madigan

Resident

Subject: Smoking Regulations& StaffReports

All,

I have attached what I believe to be the final versions of the following documents:

* Chapter 8, Smoking in Public Places

* Chapter 9, Restrictions on Sale, Use, andAvailability of Electronic Smoking Devices andUnregulatedNicotine

DeliveryProducts

* Staff Report for Chapter 8 (Local SIPP)

* Staff Report for Chapter 9 (E-cigarettes)

I think you have all seen these versions before with the exception of the staff report for e-cigarettes. Please let me

know if you have any final comments or edits prior to noon today. Otherwise, Kirsten, I think these are ready for the

Board'sMay18th meeting materials.

Gregory A. Jacoby


Page 2

8_19_2011




Tacoma, WA 98402

253.627.1181

[email protected]




Page 3

8_19_2011





Gregory Jacoby

Steve Marek

Frank Dibiase

Bruce Rytkonen

TutreciaGiles

Madigan ResidentDate: 4/29/2011 2:17:46 PM


I've drafted the website copy and uploaded it to the Sharepoint site for review. Kirsten-can you take a hard edit on

this? Anyone else is welcome at it too. It's in the Communications folder> May 2011_website copy.

Brad: the sections are where I'll need to work with you to load the regulations and the feedback form links.

Thanks!

Bridget Vandeventer



To: Gregory Jacoby; Steve Marek;Frank Dibiase; Bruce Rytkonen; Bridget Vandeventer; TutreciaGiles;Madigan

Resident





Page 1

8_19_2011





Page 3

8_19_2011




To: Gregory Jacoby

Steve Marek

Frank Dibiase

Bruce Rytkonen

Bridget Vandeventer

TutreciaGiles

Madigan ResidentDate: 4/29/2011 2:06:08 PM





Thanks, Kirsten

From: Gregory Jacoby [mailto:[email protected]]Sent: Friday, April 29, 2011 9:34 AM

To: SteveMarek;Frank Dibiase; Kirsten Frandsen; Bruce Rytkonen; Bridget Vandeventer; TutreciaGiles;Madigan

Resident


All,


* Chapter 8, Smoking in Public Places

* Chapter 9, Restrictions on Sale, Use, andAvailability of Electronic Smoking Devices andUnregulatedNicotine

DeliveryProducts

* Staff Report for Chapter 8 (Local SIPP)

* Staff Report for Chapter 9 (E-cigarettes)

Page 1

8_19_2011





Board'sMay18th meeting materials.

Gregory A. Jacoby



Tacoma, WA 98402

253.627.1181

[email protected]




Page 2

8_19_2011



From: Brad Costello


Date: 4/29/2011 1:53:38 PM

Subject: RE: Tobacco regs link

Kirsten,

The final files have been moved. Bridget upload a Key Messages document yesterday, too, so you may want to

delete one of the documents to avoid confusion. The entire folder structure on the network has been moved. What is

left under Tobacco is empty folders. The system won't let me delete one of the folder right now, but I will check

back later.

Brad



To: Brad Costello


Thanks!

I just closed the Key Messages document so it's okay to transfer.

Sounds good about keeping copies in your "H" drive- I was feeling a little funny about deleting as well- glad you

found a good option.

Thanks! Kirsten

From: Brad Costello


To: Kirsten FrandsenSubject: RE: Tobacco regs link

Page 1

8_19_2011



Kirsten,

I uploaded all of the documents to SharePoint using the same folder structure that was on the network. It looks like

you have the KeyMessages file open, so let me know when you are done with the document and I will upload the

most current version of the file. All other files have been moved to my H:\ drive so that only one set of documents will

be available to everyone. I'ma little paranoid about deleting entire folder structures until everythinghasbeen

checked, that's why I moved the documents to my H drive for now. Let me know if you see any problems.

Brad Costello




Tacoma, WA 98418-6813

(253) 798-3808

[email protected]



To: Brad Costello

Subject: Tobacco regs link

Hi Brad- thanks for setting up the Shared files for Tobacco regs.

The link to all of the documents are here: G:\LIBSHARE\Tobacco-EH\ADMIN\Board of Health SIPP and E-cigs

policy

After you transfer, can you delete these files completely? I don't want to have us working off of 2 sets of documents.

Also, when the transfer is complete, can you let me know and I can send out an email to our team?

Page 2

8_19_2011



Thanks!

Kirsten Frandsen



253.798.3540

[email protected]

Page 3

8_19_2011



From: Brad Costello


Date: 4/29/2011 1:44:18 PM


Kirsten,

I uploaded all of the documents to SharePoint using the same folder structure that was on the network. It lookslike you have the Key Messages file open, so let me know when you are done with the document and I will

upload the most current version of the file. All other files have been moved to my H:\ drive so that only one set

of documents will be available to everyone. I’m a little paranoid about deleting entire folder structures until

everything has been checked, that’s why I moved the documents to my H drive for now. Let me know if you see

any problems.

Brad Costello




Tacoma, WA 98418-6813(253) 798-3808

[email protected]

From: Kirsten FrandsenSent: Friday, April 29, 2011 9:16 AMTo: Brad CostelloSubject: Tobacco regs link


The link to all of the documents are here: G:\LIBSHARE\Tobacco-EH\ADMIN\Board of Health SIPP and E-cigs policy

After you transfer, can you delete these files completely? I don’t want to have us working off of 2 sets of

documents.


Thanks!

Kirsten Frandsen


Program Coordinator: Physical Activity, Nutrition, and Tobacco253.798.3540

[email protected]

Page 1

8_19_2011



From: Brad Costello


Date: 4/29/2011 1:44:18 PM


Kirsten,

I uploaded all of the documents to SharePoint using the same folder structure that was on the network. It looks like

you have the KeyMessages file open, so let me know when you are done with the document and I will upload the

most current version of the file. All other files have been moved to my H:\ drive so that only one set of documents will

be available to everyone. I'ma little paranoid about deleting entire folder structures until everythinghasbeen

checked, that's why I moved the documents to my H drive for now. Let me know if you see any problems.

Brad Costello




Tacoma, WA 98418-6813

(253) 798-3808

[email protected]



To: Brad Costello

Subject: Tobacco regs link


The link to all of the documents are here: G:\LIBSHARE\Tobacco-EH\ADMIN\Board of Health SIPP and E-cigs

policy

After you transfer, can you delete these files completely? I don't want to have us working off of 2 sets of documents.

Page 1

8_19_2011




Thanks!

Kirsten Frandsen



253.798.3540

[email protected]

Page 2

8_19_2011




To: Brad Costello

Date: 4/29/2011 1:47:22 PM


Thanks!

I just closed the Key Messages document so it’s okay to transfer.

Sounds good about keeping copies in your “H” drive- I was feeling a little funny about deleting as well- glad you


Thanks! Kirsten

From: Brad CostelloSent: Friday, April 29, 2011 10:44 AMTo: Kirsten FrandsenSubject: RE: Tobacco regs link

Kirsten,

I uploaded all of the documents to SharePoint using the same folder structure that was on the network. It looks

like you have the Key Messages file open, so let me know when you are done with the document and I will




any problems.

Brad Costello

Technical Assistant IITacoma-Pierce County Health Department


Tacoma, WA 98418-6813

(253) 798-3808

[email protected]





documents.


Thanks!

Kirsten Frandsen



253.798.3540

Page 1

8_19_2011



[email protected]

Page 2

8_19_2011




To: Brad Costello

Date: 4/29/2011 1:47:20 PM


Thanks!

I just closed the Key Messages document so it’s okay to transfer.

Sounds good about keeping copies in your “H” drive- I was feeling a little funny about deleting as well- glad you


Thanks! Kirsten

From: Brad CostelloSent: Friday, April 29, 2011 10:44 AMTo: Kirsten FrandsenSubject: RE: Tobacco regs link

Kirsten,

I uploaded all of the documents to SharePoint using the same folder structure that was on the network. It looks

like you have the Key Messages file open, so let me know when you are done with the document and I will




any problems.

Brad Costello

Technical Assistant IITacoma-Pierce County Health Department


Tacoma, WA 98418-6813

(253) 798-3808

[email protected]





documents.


Thanks!

Kirsten Frandsen



253.798.3540

Page 1

8_19_2011



[email protected]

Page 2

8_19_2011




To: Steve Marek

Frank Dibiase

Kirsten Frandsen

Bruce Rytkonen

Bridget Vandeventer

TutreciaGiles

MadiganResidentDate: 4/29/2011 12:34:16 PM





Staff ReportE-CigsFinal.docx



Chapter 9, Restrictions on Sale, Use, and Availability of Electronic Smoking Devices and UnregulatedNicotine Delivery Products



I think you have all seen these versions before with the exception of the staff report for e-cigarettes. Please let

Page 1

8_19_2011



me know if you have any final comments or edits prior to noon today. Otherwise, Kirsten, I think these are readfor the Board’s May 18th meeting materials.

Gregory A. Jacoby



Tacoma, WA 98402

253.627.1181

[email protected]




253.627.1181.

Page 2

8_19_2011




To: Steve Marek

Frank Dibiase

Kirsten Frandsen

Bruce Rytkonen

Bridget Vandeventer

TutreciaGiles







All,


· Chapter 8, Smoking in Public Places

· Chapter 9, Restrictions on Sale, Use, andAvailability of ElectronicSmokingDevices andUnregulatedNicotine

DeliveryProducts

· Staff Report for Chapter 8 (Local SIPP)

· Staff Report for Chapter 9 (E-cigarettes)



Board’sMay18th meeting materials.

Gregory A. Jacoby



Tacoma, WA 98402

253.627.1181

Page 1

8_19_2011



[email protected]




Page 2

8_19_2011




To: Steve Marek

Frank Dibiase

Kirsten Frandsen

Bruce Rytkonen

Bridget Vandeventer

TutreciaGiles









Chapter 9, Restrictions on Sale, Use, and Availability of Electronic Smoking Devices and UnregulatedNicotine Delivery Products



I think you have all seen these versions before with the exception of the staff report for e-cigarettes. Please let

Page 1

8_19_2011



me know if you have any final comments or edits prior to noon today. Otherwise, Kirsten, I think these are readfor the Board’s May 18th meeting materials.

Gregory A. Jacoby



Tacoma, WA 98402

253.627.1181

[email protected]




253.627.1181.

Page 2

8_19_2011




To: Steve Marek

Frank Dibiase

Kirsten Frandsen

Bruce Rytkonen

Bridget Vandeventer

TutreciaGiles







All,


· Chapter 8, Smoking in Public Places

· Chapter 9, Restrictions on Sale, Use, andAvailability of ElectronicSmokingDevices andUnregulatedNicotine

DeliveryProducts

· Staff Report for Chapter 8 (Local SIPP)

· Staff Report for Chapter 9 (E-cigarettes)



Board’sMay18th meeting materials.

Gregory A. Jacoby



Tacoma, WA 98402

253.627.1181

Page 1

8_19_2011



[email protected]




Page 2

8_19_2011




To: Brad Costello

D t 4/29/2011 12 15 46 PM

Page 1