tables of appendixes the effect of schema theory on reading comprehension

22
Appendix I Pre-Test Score of the Experimental Class. No. Name Scores Qualification X 1 X 1 2 1. Ana Puspita Sari 38 1444 Insufficient 2. Arkudi Mardani 13 169 Insufficient 3. Asih Sukarsih 40 1600 Insufficient 4. Ayu Anita 40 1600 Insufficient 5. Deli Sartika 38 1444 Insufficient 6. Deska Ayu Safitri 53 2809 Insufficient 7. Desti Ramayanti 48 2304 Insufficient 8. Dian Kusrini 38 1444 Insufficient 9. Era Cici Juita 45 2025 Insufficient 10. Gunawan Ramli 20 400 Insufficient 11. Irwan Nugraha 38 1444 Insufficient 12. Ita Purnama Sari 35 1225 Insufficient 13. Liza Gustia 28 784 Insufficient 14. Meta Septiana 35 1225 Insufficient 15. Okta Firnanda 35 1225 Insufficient 16. Popy Oktasari 45 2025 Insufficient 17. Putri Utami M 40 1600 Insufficient 18. Rama Yunita 38 1444 Insufficient 19. Reki Veriansah 38 1444 Insufficient 20. Saifatul Husna Diah 25 625 Insufficient 21. Selva Ana Dewi 40 1600 Insufficient 22. Wandi Wantara 25 625 Insufficient 23. Wawan Suprianto 25 625 Insufficient 24. Weka Azminarti 43 1849 Insufficient 25. Yegi Fitriani 40 1600 Insufficient ∑N=25 ∑X 1= 903 ∑X 1 2 =34579 Mean 36,12

Upload: dhe-dhe-sulistio

Post on 02-Jul-2015

290 views

Category:

Education


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Tables of appendixes The Effect Of Schema Theory On Reading Comprehension

Appendix I

Pre-Test Score of the Experimental Class.

No. Name Scores Qualification

X1 X12

1. Ana Puspita Sari 38 1444 Insufficient

2. Arkudi Mardani 13 169 Insufficient

3. Asih Sukarsih 40 1600 Insufficient

4. Ayu Anita 40 1600 Insufficient

5. Deli Sartika 38 1444 Insufficient

6. Deska Ayu Safitri 53 2809 Insufficient

7. Desti Ramayanti 48 2304 Insufficient

8. Dian Kusrini 38 1444 Insufficient

9. Era Cici Juita 45 2025 Insufficient

10. Gunawan Ramli 20 400 Insufficient

11. Irwan Nugraha 38 1444 Insufficient

12. Ita Purnama Sari 35 1225 Insufficient

13. Liza Gustia 28 784 Insufficient

14. Meta Septiana 35 1225 Insufficient

15. Okta Firnanda 35 1225 Insufficient

16. Popy Oktasari 45 2025 Insufficient

17. Putri Utami M 40 1600 Insufficient

18. Rama Yunita 38 1444 Insufficient

19. Reki Veriansah 38 1444 Insufficient

20. Saifatul Husna Diah 25 625 Insufficient

21. Selva Ana Dewi 40 1600 Insufficient

22. Wandi Wantara 25 625 Insufficient

23. Wawan Suprianto 25 625 Insufficient

24. Weka Azminarti 43 1849 Insufficient

25. Yegi Fitriani 40 1600 Insufficient

∑N=25 ∑X1=903 ∑X12=34579

Mean 36,12

Page 2: Tables of appendixes The Effect Of Schema Theory On Reading Comprehension

Appendix II

Pre-Test Score of the Control Class

No. Name Scores Qualification

X1 X12

1. Aten Risdiana 58 3364 Insufficient

2. Desi Ayu Lestari 58 3364 Insufficient

3. Dwi Lestari 63 3969 Insufficient

4. Eeng Reza Putra 55 3025 Insufficient

5. Epan Saputra 65 4225 Insufficient

6. Fajar Heryansyah 43 1849 Insufficient

7. Febrianti 43 1849 Insufficient

8. Indah Permataa Sari 48 2304 Insufficient

9. Ismeiti Riska 48 2304 Insufficient

10. Jamilatus Taghna 60 3600 Insufficient

11. Lan Persa Odearty P 58 3364 Insufficient

12. Linda Mariana 58 3364 Insufficient

13. Megawati 48 2304 Insufficient

14. Meta Meilina 53 2809 Insufficient

15. Novia Agustina 50 2500 Insufficient

16. Pil Chandra 55 3025 Insufficient

17. Rahmi Putri 53 2809 Insufficient

18. Rahmi Suliastini 58 3364 Insufficient

19. Rensi Soneta 55 3025 Insufficient

20. Rio Valendra 45 2025 Insufficient

21. Susti Hartini AS 40 1600 Insufficient

∑N=21 ∑X1=1114 ∑X12=60042

Mean 53,04

Page 3: Tables of appendixes The Effect Of Schema Theory On Reading Comprehension

Pre-Test of the Experimental Class and Control Class

No. Subject

N

Experimental class Subject

N

Control Class

X1 X12 X1 X1

2

1. 1 38 1444 1 58 3364

2. 2 13 169 2 58 3364

3. 3 40 1600 3 63 3969

4. 4 40 1600 4 55 3025

5. 5 38 1444 5 65 4225

6. 6 53 2809 6 43 1849

7. 7 48 2304 7 43 1849

8. 8 38 1444 8 48 2304

9. 9 45 2025 9 48 2304

10. 10 20 400 10 60 3600

11. 11 38 1444 11 58 3364

12. 12 35 1225 12 58 3364

13. 13 28 784 13 48 2304

14. 14 35 1225 14 53 2809

15. 15 35 1225 15 50 2500

16. 16 45 2025 16 55 3025

17. 17 40 1600 17 53 2809

18. 18 38 1444 18 58 3364

19. 19 38 1444 19 55 3025

20. 20 25 625 20 45 2025

21. 21 40 1600 21 40 1600

22. 22 25 625

23. 23 25 625

24. 24 43 1849

25. 25 40 1600

∑N=25 ∑X1=903 ∑X12=34579 ∑N=21 ∑X1=1114 ∑X1

2=60042

Mean 36,12 Mean 53,04

Page 4: Tables of appendixes The Effect Of Schema Theory On Reading Comprehension

T – Test of Pre Test

T-Test =

=

=

=

=

=

=

=

= - 7, 35

Page 5: Tables of appendixes The Effect Of Schema Theory On Reading Comprehension

Appendix VIII

Post-Test Score of the Experimental Class.

No. Name Scores Qualification

X1 X12

1. Ana Puspita Sari 95 9025 Very good

2. Arkudi Mardani 70 4900 Sufficient

3. Asih Sukarsih 80 6400 Good

4. Ayu Anita 93 8649 Very good

5. Deli Sartika 70 4900 Sufficient

6. Deska Ayu Safitri 83 6889 Good

7. Desti Ramayanti 88 7744 Good

8. Dian Kusrini 70 4900 Sufficient

9. Era Cici Juita 87 7569 Good

10. Gunawan Ramli 83 6889 Good

11. Irwan Nugraha 88 7744 Good

12. Ita Purnama Sari 90 8100 Very good

13. Liza Gustia 80 6400 Good

14. Meta Septiana 80 6400 Good

15. Okta Firnanda 83 6889 Good

16. Popy Oktasari 98 9604 Very Good

17. Putri Utami M 78 6084 Sufficient

18. Rama Yunita 85 7225 Good

19. Reki Veriansah 70 4900 Sufficient

20. Saifatul Husna Diah 90 8100 Very good

21. Selva Ana Dewi 78 6084 Sufficient

22. Wandi Wantara 95 9025 Very good

23. Wawan Suprianto 78 6084 Sufficient

24. Weka Azminarti 88 7744 Good

25. Yegi Fitriani 63 3969 Insufficient

∑N=25 ∑X1=2063 ∑X12=172217

Mean 82,52

Page 6: Tables of appendixes The Effect Of Schema Theory On Reading Comprehension

Appendix IX

Table 2. Post-Test Score of the Control Class

No. Name Scores Qualification

X1 X12

1. Aten Risdiana 73 5329 Sufficient

2. Desi Ayu Lestari 83 6889 Good

3. Dwi Lestari 80 6400 Good

4. Eeng Reza Putra 73 5329 Sufficient

5. Epan Saputra 73 5329 Sufficient

6. Fajar Heryansyah 65 4225 Insufficient

7. Febrianti 68 4624 Insufficient

8. Indah Permataa Sari 55 3025 Insufficient

9. Ismeiti Riska 65 4225 Insufficient

10. Jamilatus Taghna 58 3364 Insufficient

11. Lan Persa Odearty P 70 4900 Sufficient

12. Linda Mariana 33 1089 Insufficient

13. Megawati 53 2809 Insufficient

14. Meta Meilina 48 2304 Insufficient

15. Novia Agustina 68 4624 Insufficient

16. Pil Chandra 63 3969 Insufficient

17. Rahmi Putri 70 4900 Sufficient

18. Rahmi Suliastini 70 4900 Sufficient

19. Rensi Soneta 53 2809 Insufficient

20. Rio Valendra 63 3969 Insufficient

21. Susti Hartini AS 68 4624 Insufficient

∑N=21 ∑X1=1352 ∑X12=89636

Mean 64,38

Page 7: Tables of appendixes The Effect Of Schema Theory On Reading Comprehension

Table 6. Post-Test Score of the Experimental Class and the Control Class

No. Subject

N

Experimental Class Subject

N

Control Class

X1 X12 X1 X1

2

1. 1 95 9025 1 73 5329

2. 2 70 4900 2 83 6889

3. 3 80 6400 3 80 6400

4. 4 93 8649 4 73 5329

5. 5 70 4900 5 73 5329

6. 6 83 6889 6 65 4225

7. 7 88 7744 7 68 4624

8. 8 70 4900 8 55 3025

9. 9 87 7569 9 65 4225

10. 10 83 6889 10 58 3364

11. 11 88 7744 11 70 4900

12. 12 90 8100 12 33 1089

13. 13 80 6400 13 53 2809

14. 14 80 6400 14 48 2304

15. 15 83 6889 15 68 4624

16. 16 98 9604 16 63 3969

17. 17 78 6084 17 70 4900

18. 18 85 7225 18 70 4900

19. 19 70 4900 19 53 2809

20. 20 90 8100 20 63 3969

21. 21 78 6084 21 68 4624

22. 22 95 9025

23. 23 78 6084

24. 24 88 7744

25. 25 63 3969

∑N= 25 ∑X1=2063 ∑X12=172217 ∑N=21 ∑X1=1352 ∑X1

2=89636

Mean 82,52 Mean 64,38

Page 8: Tables of appendixes The Effect Of Schema Theory On Reading Comprehension

T – Test of Post-Test

T-Test =

=

=

=

=

=

=

=

= 6, 29

Page 9: Tables of appendixes The Effect Of Schema Theory On Reading Comprehension

Appendix III

Treatment I (Experimental Class)

No. Name Scores Qualification

X1 X12

1. Ana Puspita Sari 45 2025 Insufficient

2. Arkudi Mardani 35 1225 Insufficient

3. Asih Sukarsih 85 7225 Good

4. Ayu Anita 85 7225 Good

5. Deli Sartika 50 2500 Insufficient

6. Deska Ayu Safitri 60 3600 Insufficient

7. Desti Ramayanti 70 4900 Insufficient

8. Dian Kusrini 65 4225 Insufficient

9. Era Cici Juita 75 5625 Sufficient

10. Gunawan Ramli 10 100 Insufficient

11. Irwan Nugraha 60 3600 Insufficient

12. Ita Purnama Sari 75 5625 Insufficient

13. Liza Gustia 45 2025 Insufficient

14. Meta Septiana 60 3600 Insufficient

15. Okta Firnanda 75 5625 Sufficient

16. Popy Oktasari 80 6400 Sufficient

17. Putri Utami M 50 2500 Insufficient

18. Rama Yunita 10 100 Insufficient

19. Reki Veriansah 35 1225 Insufficient

20. Saifatul Husna Diah 35 1225 Insufficient

21. Selva Ana Dewi 50 2500 Insufficient

22. Wandi Wantara 75 5625 Sufficient

23. Wawan Suprianto 10 100 Insufficient

24. Weka Azminarti 35 1225 Insufficient

25. Yegi Fitriani 25 625 Insufficient

∑N=25 1300 80650

Mean 52

Page 10: Tables of appendixes The Effect Of Schema Theory On Reading Comprehension

Appendix IV

Treatment II (Experimental Class)

No. Name Scores Qualification

X1 X12

1. Ana Puspita Sari 60 3600 Insufficient

2. Arkudi Mardani 50 2500 Insufficient

3. Asih Sukarsih 50 2500 Insufficient

4. Ayu Anita 90 8100 Good

5. Deli Sartika 50 2500 Insufficient

6. Deska Ayu Safitri 60 3600 Insufficient

7. Desti Ramayanti 85 7225 Good

8. Dian Kusrini 65 4225 Insufficient

9. Era Cici Juita 50 2500 Sufficient

10. Gunawan Ramli 20 400 Insufficient

11. Irwan Nugraha 70 4900 Sufficient

12. Ita Purnama Sari 50 2500 Insufficient

13. Liza Gustia 80 6400 Good

14. Meta Septiana 70 4900 Sufficient

15. Okta Firnanda 50 2500 Insufficient

16. Popy Oktasari 100 10000 Very good

17. Putri Utami M 30 900 Insufficient

18. Rama Yunita 50 2500 Insufficient

19. Reki Veriansah 30 900 Insufficient

20. Saifatul Husna Diah 30 900 Insufficient

21. Selva Ana Dewi 50 2500 Insufficient

22. Wandi Wantara 50 2500 Insufficient

23. Wawan Suprianto 20 400 Insufficient

24. Weka Azminarti 40 1600 Insufficient

25. Yegi Fitriani 50 2500 Insufficient

∑N=25 1350 83050

Mean 54

Page 11: Tables of appendixes The Effect Of Schema Theory On Reading Comprehension

Appendix V

Treatment III(Experimental Class)

No. Name Scores Qualification

X1 X12

1. Ana Puspita Sari 70 4900 Sufficient

2. Arkudi Mardani 85 7225 Good

3. Asih Sukarsih 70 4900 Sufficient

4. Ayu Anita 95 9025 Very Good

5. Deli Sartika 80 6400 Good

6. Deska Ayu Safitri 75 5625 Sufficient

7. Desti Ramayanti 90 8100 Very Good

8. Dian Kusrini 80 6400 Good

9. Era Cici Juita 95 9025 Very Good

10. Gunawan Ramli 70 4900 Sufficient

11. Irwan Nugraha 80 6400 Good

12. Ita Purnama Sari 85 7225 Good

13. Liza Gustia 80 6400 Good

14. Meta Septiana 95 9025 Very Good

15. Okta Firnanda 75 5625 Sufficient

16. Popy Oktasari 95 9025 Very Good

17. Putri Utami M 80 6400 Good

18. Rama Yunita 95 9025 Very Good

19. Reki Veriansah 70 4900 Sufficient

20. Saifatul Husna Diah 80 6400 Good

21. Selva Ana Dewi 80 6400 Good

22. Wandi Wantara 75 5625 Sufficient

23. Wawan Suprianto 85 7225 Good

24. Weka Azminarti 70 4900 Sufficient

25. Yegi Fitriani 80 6400 Good

∑N=25 2035 167475

Mean 81, 4

Page 12: Tables of appendixes The Effect Of Schema Theory On Reading Comprehension

Appendix VI

Treatment IV(Experimental Class)

No. Name Scores Qualification

X1 X12

1. Ana Puspita Sari 80 6400 Good

2. Arkudi Mardani 75 5625 Sufficient

3. Asih Sukarsih 85 7225 Good

4. Ayu Anita 99 9801 Very Good

5. Deli Sartika 80 6400 Good

6. Deska Ayu Safitri 50 2500 Insufficient

7. Desti Ramayanti 80 6400 Good

8. Dian Kusrini 70 4900 Sufficient

9. Era Cici Juita 95 9025 Very Good

10. Gunawan Ramli 80 6400 Good

11. Irwan Nugraha 80 6400 Good

12. Ita Purnama Sari 95 9025 Very Good

13. Liza Gustia 70 4900 Sufficient

14. Meta Septiana 95 9025 Very Good

15. Okta Firnanda 90 8100 Very Good

16. Popy Oktasari 95 9025 Very Good

17. Putri Utami M 80 6400 Good

18. Rama Yunita 90 8100 Very Good

19. Reki Veriansah 70 4900 Sufficient

20. Saifatul Husna Diah 90 8100 Very Good

21. Selva Ana Dewi 80 6400 Good

22. Wandi Wantara 40 1600 Insufficient

23. Wawan Suprianto 95 9025 Very Good

24. Weka Azminarti 30 900 Insufficient

25. Yegi Fitriani 80 6400 Good

∑N=25 1974 162976

Mean 78, 89

Page 13: Tables of appendixes The Effect Of Schema Theory On Reading Comprehension

Appendix VII

Treatment I (Control Class)

No. Name Scores Qualification

X1 X12

1. Aten Risdiana 50 2500 Insufficient

2. Desi Ayu Lestari 65 4225 Insufficient

3. Dwi Lestari 65 4225 Insufficient

4. Eeng Reza Putra 65 4225 Insufficient

5. Epan Saputra 65 4225 Insufficient

6. Fajar Heryansyah 50 2500 Insufficient

7. Febrianti 65 4225 Insufficient

8. Indah Permataa Sari 65 4225 Insufficient

9. Ismeiti Riska 50 2500 Insufficient

10. Jamilatus Taghna 50 2500 Insufficient

11. Lan Persa Odearty P 25 625 Insufficient

12. Linda Mariana 55 3025 Insufficient

13. Megawati 65 4225 Insufficient

14. Meta Meilina 65 4225 Insufficient

15. Novia Agustina 60 3600 Insufficient

16. Pil Chandra 60 3600 Insufficient

17. Rahmi Suliastini 60 3600 Insufficient

18. Rahmi Putri 65 4225 Insufficient

19. Rensi Soneta 65 4225 Insufficient

20. Rio Valendra 60 3600 Insufficient

21. Susti Hartini AS 50 2500 Insufficient

∑N=21 1220 72800

Mean 58, 09

Page 14: Tables of appendixes The Effect Of Schema Theory On Reading Comprehension

Treatment II (Control Class)

No. Name Scores Qualification

X1 X12

1. Aten Risdiana 70 4900 Sufficient

2. Desi Ayu Lestari 70 4900 Sufficient

3. Dwi Lestari 70 4900 Sufficient

4. Eeng Reza Putra 70 4900 Sufficient

5. Epan Saputra 75 5625 Sufficient

6. Fajar Heryansyah 70 4900 Sufficient

7. Febrianti 70 4900 Sufficient

8. Indah Permataa Sari 80 6400 Good

9. Ismeiti Riska 60 3600 Insufficient

10. Jamilatus Taghna 50 2500 Insufficient

11. Lan Persa Odearty P 70 4900 Sufficient

12. Linda Mariana 50 2500 Insufficient

13. Megawati 50 2500 Insufficient

14. Meta Meilina 60 3600 Insufficient

15. Novia Agustina 50 2500 Insufficient

16. Pil Chandra 75 5625 Sufficient

17. Rahmi Suliastini 70 4900 Sufficient

18. Rahmi Putri 85 7225 Good

19. Rensi Soneta 50 2500 Insufficient

20. Rio Valendra 70 4900 Sufficient

21. Susti Hartini AS 60 3600 Insufficient

∑N=21 1375 92275

Mean 65, 47

Page 15: Tables of appendixes The Effect Of Schema Theory On Reading Comprehension

Treatment III (Control Class)

No. Name Scores Qualification

X1 X12

1. Aten Risdiana 90 8100 Very Good

2. Desi Ayu Lestari 80 6400 Good

3. Dwi Lestari 85 7225 Good

4. Eeng Reza Putra 65 4225 Insufficient

5. Epan Saputra 80 6400 Good

6. Fajar Heryansyah 70 4900 Sufficient

7. Febrianti 85 7225 Good

8. Indah Permataa Sari 95 9025 Very Good

9. Ismeiti Riska 80 6400 Good

10. Jamilatus Taghna 65 4225 Insufficient

11. Lan Persa Odearty P 80 6400 Good

12. Linda Mariana 65 4225 Insufficient

13. Megawati 85 7225 Good

14. Meta Meilina 70 4900 Sufficient

15. Novia Agustina 65 4225 Insufficient

16. Pil Chandra 80 6400 Good

17. Rahmi Suliastini 85 7225 Good

18. Rahmi Putri 80 6400 Good

19. Rensi Soneta 80 6400 Good

20. Rio Valendra 70 4900 Sufficient

21. Susti Hartini AS 65 4225 Insufficient

∑N=21 1620 126650

Mean 77, 14

Page 16: Tables of appendixes The Effect Of Schema Theory On Reading Comprehension

Treatment IV (Control Class)

No. Name Scores Qualification

X1 X12

1. Aten Risdiana 60 3600 Insufficient

2. Desi Ayu Lestari 55 3025 Insufficient

3. Dwi Lestari 60 3600 Insufficient

4. Eeng Reza Putra 55 3025 Insufficient

5. Epan Saputra 55 3025 Insufficient

6. Fajar Heryansyah 50 2500 Insufficient

7. Febrianti 55 3025 Insufficient

8. Indah Permataa Sari 55 3025 Insufficient

9. Ismeiti Riska 60 3600 Insufficient

10. Jamilatus Taghna 55 3025 Insufficient

11. Lan Persa Odearty P 75 5625 Sufficient

12. Linda Mariana 55 3025 Insufficient

13. Megawati 55 3025 Insufficient

14. Meta Meilina 55 3025 Insufficient

15. Novia Agustina 60 3600 Insufficient

16. Pil Chandra 50 2500 Insufficient

17. Rahmi Suliastini 55 3025 Insufficient

18. Rahmi Putri 65 4225 Insufficient

19. Rensi Soneta 55 3025 Insufficient

20. Rio Valendra 60 3600 Insufficient

21. Susti Hartini AS 70 4900 Sufficient

∑N=21 1215 71025

Mean 57, 85

Page 17: Tables of appendixes The Effect Of Schema Theory On Reading Comprehension

KEY ANSWERS OF PRE-TEST AND POST-TEST

1. The reading is about gender equality

2. Many girls said if she were boy, their live would be better economically

and status wife and they would enjoy more freedom and have a better time

with less responsibility

3. Boys felt that if they were girls they would have to be beautiful and know

how to put make up and dress well

4. The careers did the girls envision for themselves if they were boys are

professional athletes, auto mechanics, construction workers, pilots,

engineers, forest rangers, stuntmen. Coal miners, sportscasters, and

farmers.

5. Children learn stereotypes by some spectacular remembering the power

example such as physician, doctor, etc.

6. He went to soccer matches together with her uncle

7. Their plane crashed at Orly airport

8. Alain’s grandmother had stroke when she heard news

9. Alain learn about “the promise” is when he stayed with his cousin.

10. The class began to applaud and smile.

11. There are twelve animals in the Chinese horoscope

12. the dragon comes fifth in the Chinese horoscope

13. Chinese king invite all the animals to his palace to celebrate the New Year.

14. The rat is the first animal arrive

15. Buffalo, bird and ant are the names of animals that did not accept the

Chinese king’s invitation.

16. The birthday celebrations for in Juli’s country is only for children because

child’s birthday, he or she is the most important person in the house

17. The baby’s first birthday celebrated in Tin-Sek’sbaby is 30 days after it’s

born. The next birthday comes when the baby is one year old

18. The most important birthday for a man is when he is 60th

years old

The most important birthday for a woman is when he is 61th

years old

Page 18: Tables of appendixes The Effect Of Schema Theory On Reading Comprehension

Because the whole family, children, grandchildren, and nephews and

nieces come to celebrate. It is an important day.

19. He discovers who she is by comparing that two hand writing that had been

sent by her.

20. Otto decides to call her up. I’II asks her out. Maybe he’II has dinner next

Friday.

Page 19: Tables of appendixes The Effect Of Schema Theory On Reading Comprehension

KEY ANSWERS OF TREATMENT I

1. The reading about is gender quality

2. 2.00 adults surveyed in Education at the University of Colorado

3. Females a serious lack of respect.

4. Many girls said if she were boy, their live would be better economically

and status wife and they would enjoy more freedom and have a better time

with less responsibility

5. Boys felt that if they were girls they would have to be beautiful and know

how to put make up and dress well

6. The careers did the girls envision for themselves if they were boys are

professional athletes, auto mechanics, construction workers, pilots,

engineers, forest rangers, stuntmen. Coal miners, sportscasters, and

farmers.

7. calm and cool whenever something happened, and rowdy, macho, and

smart lackey and show off more

8. Children learn stereotypes by some spectacular remembering the power

example such as physician, doctor, etc.

9. Encourage your daughter’s athletic interest as well as your son’s.

Remember the power of example. Educate your sons and daughters about

stereotypes. Let them know boys and girls can do many of the same things

equally well

10. The carriers are Physicians, lawyers, bankers, politicians, and don’t forget

Supreme Court justice Sandra day O’Connor.

Page 20: Tables of appendixes The Effect Of Schema Theory On Reading Comprehension

KEY ANSWERS OF TREATMENT II

1. Alain’s is telling the story.

2. Alain’s is made the promise.

3. He went to soccer matches together with her uncle

4. My parents went to France for attend my cousin’s wedding

5. Their plane crashed at Orly airport

6. Alain’s grandmother had stroke when she heard news

7. Alain learn about “the promise” was he stayed with his cousin.

8. Alain to come to the U.S. is when grandmother got out of the hospital and

she and I lived together. But before that, my aunt and uncle came back for

the funeral

9. Alain feel new family and new home are wonderful

10. The class began to applaud and smile

Page 21: Tables of appendixes The Effect Of Schema Theory On Reading Comprehension

KEY ANSWERS OF TREATMENT III

1. There are twelve animals in the Chinese horoscope

2. the dragon comes fifth in the Chinese horoscope

3. Chinese king invite all the animals to his palace to celebrate the New

Year.

4. The rat is the first animal arrive

5. Buffalo, bird and ant are the names of animals that did not accept the

Chinese king’s invitation.

6. My animal represent the year of birth was snake. In this year is the

dragon.

7. Yes, because the Chinese horoscope tell about deep thinker, wise

graceful, creative, calm, responsible, constant and purposeful.

Page 22: Tables of appendixes The Effect Of Schema Theory On Reading Comprehension

KEY ANSWERS OF TREATMENT IV

1. Otto doing at home was correcting some compositions from his English

class.

2. The birthday celebrations for in Juli’s country is only for children because

child’s birthday, he or she is the most important person in the house

3. In Juli’s country the family celebrates the birthday all day long. The lucky

boy or girls gets gifts, special food, and money. Birthday children don’t

have to go to school on their birthdays. It’s a wonderful day

4. The baby’s first birthday celebrated in Tin-Sek’s baby is 30 days after it’s

born. The next birthday comes when the baby is one years old.

5. The most important birthday for a man is when he is 60th

years old

The most important birthday for a woman is when he is 61th

years old.

Because the whole family, children, grandchildren, and nephews and

nieces come to celebrate. It is an important day.

6. Otto taking thought about his life with Sandy

7. He found compositions from his desk, he noticed a red envelope sticking

out from under a pile of bills and old letters.

8. Otto’s secret admirer the envelope and read the card

9. He discovers who she is by comparing that two hand writing that had been

sent by her.

10. Otto decides to call her up. I’II asks her out. Maybe he’II has dinner next

Friday.