table of contents - silverbirch wind farmsilverbirchwindfarm.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/...the...
TRANSCRIPT
Table of contents
9 NOISE AND VIBRATION ........................................................................................... 9-1
9.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................. 9-1
9.1.1 Methodology ...................................................................................................................................... 9-1
9.1.2 Wind Farm Noise, Policy and Guidance ............................................................................................. 9-2
9.1.3 Construction Noise – Policy and Guidance ........................................................................................ 9-3
9.1.4 Survey Methodology .......................................................................................................................... 9-3
9.2 Existing Environment ..................................................................................................... 9-8
9.2.1 Noise Monitoring Locations ............................................................................................................... 9-8
9.2.2 Derivation of Prevailing Background Noise ...................................................................................... 9-10
9.3 Likely Significant Impacts ............................................................................................. 9-15
9.3.1 Operational Phase of Predicted Results ........................................................................................... 9-15
9.3.2 Substation ........................................................................................................................................ 9-16
9.3.3 Cumulative Impact ........................................................................................................................... 9-17
9.3.4 Potential for Tonal Content .............................................................................................................. 9-21
9.3.5 Vibration and Low Frequency Noise ................................................................................................ 9-21
9.3.6 Amplitude Modulation ..................................................................................................................... 9-23
9.3.7 Construction Phase .......................................................................................................................... 9-23
9.3.8 General Construction Activities........................................................................................................ 9-23
9.3.9 Construction Traffic .......................................................................................................................... 9-27
9.4 Mitigation .................................................................................................................... 9-28
9.4.1 Mitigation for Amplitude Modulation .............................................................................................. 9-28
9.5 Residual Impacts .......................................................................................................... 9-28
9.6 Conclusion ................................................................................................................... 9-28
17924-6001-A Noise and Vibration March 2017
9-1
9 NOISE AND VIBRATION
9.1 INTRODUCTION
This report describes the potential noise and vibration associated with the construction and
operation of the proposed Silverbirch wind farm.
The main sources of noise from a wind turbine include aerodynamic noise (rotating blades in the air)
and mechanical noise (gearbox (if not a direct drive system) and generator).
Noise only occurs above the ‘cut-in’ wind speed and below the ‘cut-out’ wind speed. The typical ‘cut-
in’ wind speed of a modern turbine is 3 meters per second (m/s) and the ‘cut-out’ wind speed is
approximately 25 to 30 m/s. At this stage of the proposal the preferred turbine candidates have not
yet been finalised. For the purpose of this assessment the sound power levels and octave banding
associated with the Nordex N117 3MW turbine were used (this turbine is representative of the
turbine dimensions proposed for the project). Ultimately the most appropriate turbine model and
operating modes will be selected in order to achieve the noise limits set down in the current DoEHLG
Windfarm Planning Guidelines, 2006.
Construction noise will occur during excavation and earth moving, laying of roads and hard
standings, transportation of materials and erection of the wind turbines. The construction phase will
be phased and temporary.
Amplitude Modulation, Infrasound, Wind Farm Noise on Health and Vibration associated with wind
turbines have also been addressed in this report.
The report assesses the impact of the operational and construction phase of the proposed wind farm
against noise guideline thresholds in the current DoEHLG Windfarm Planning Guidelines, 2006.
Vibration, low frequency noise and infrasound are also discussed in brief. These characteristics are
outside the scope of the assessment criteria and methodology in the UK and Ireland.
9.1.1 Methodology
In general the methodology used to assess the noise impact from wind farms includes extended
measurements of the existing background noise levels (across a range of wind speeds) at nearby
representative dwellings and comparisons against the predicted noise output from the wind farm,
which also varies with wind speed. The methodology and planning guidance framework are
described in the following sections.
The report assesses the impact of the operational and construction phase of the proposed wind farm
against noise guideline thresholds in the current Irish Wind Energy Development Guidelines
(DoEHLG, 2006).
17924-6001-A Noise and Vibration March 2017
9-2
9.1.2 Wind Farm Noise, Policy and Guidance
As with any development a balance must be struck between the noise restrictions placed on a wind
farm, the protection of amenity and the national and global benefits of renewable energy
development. The guidance documents used in the preparation of this report are best practice in
assessing wind farm noise and are outlined as follows:
9.1.2.1 ETSU-R-97 – The Assessment and Rating of Wind Farm Noise (1997)
The assessment was undertaken with cognisance to ETSU-R-97 – The Assessment and Rating of Wind
Farm Noise (1997)1. This document is currently used as the industry standard in the UK and Ireland
and the noise levels contained within the Irish Wind Energy Development Guidelines are adapted
from this document.
9.1.2.2 IOA Acoustics Bulletin Article, Prediction and Assessment of Wind Turbine Noise, March/
April 2009
The Institute of Acoustics Bulletin Vol. 34 no 2 contains an agreement, jointly authored by a number
of consultants working in the wind turbine sector for developers, local authorities and third parties,
on an agreed methodology for addressing issues not covered by ETSU-R-97. This includes a
methodology for dealing with wind shear and an agreed method for noise predictions.
9.1.2.3 A Good Practice Guide (GPG) to the application of ETSU-R-97 for the Assessment and Rating
of Wind Turbine Noise (Institute of Acoustics, 2013).
This publication which was issued by the Institute of Acoustics in May 2013, is endorsed by the UK,
Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC), the Northern Ireland Executive, the Scottish
Executive and the Welsh Assembly and provides guidance on all aspects of the use of ETSU-R-97. The
assessment presented herein adopts the recommendations of the GPG.
9.1.2.4 Department of the Environment, Heritage, and Local Government (DoEHLG) – Wind Energy
Development Guidelines (Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government
2006)
This document provides the framework for wind farm noise assessment in Ireland. The noise limit
thresholds in this publication are those currently endorsed by the Irish Government and deemed to
strike the balance between the protection of residential amenity and renewable energy
developments.
1 A recent research report published by Hayes McKenzie reviewed the way noise assessments are being carried out as part
of the application process for planning consent for wind turbines in England. It was reported that from the sample set
reviewed the ETSU-R-97 methodology has been universally adopted for the assessment of noise from proposed wind farm
developments with 100% of cases stating it to be the appropriate guidance.
17924-6001-A Noise and Vibration March 2017
9-3
9.1.3 Construction Noise – Policy and Guidance
There are no mandatory noise limits for construction noise in Ireland. The most recent revision of BS
5228-1:2009 Code of practice for noise and vibration control on construction and open sites outlines
noise thresholds for significant impacts.
9.1.4 Survey Methodology
9.1.4.1 Prevailing Background Noise Levels
For the purpose of this assessment noise monitoring was carried out for periods of ten days to two
weeks at each of the measurement locations between January and March 2016. Noise monitoring
was undertaken at 11 locations (NM1 to NM11) which were selected to be representative of the
dwellings closest to the proposed development. Appendix 9-B to this report contains details
(including photographs) on each of the noise monitoring locations. The monitoring equipment used
included:
a) A series of Larson Davis 831 sound level meters were used to measure background noise
levels at the selected receptors. The microphone was mounted on a tripod at least 3m away
from any reflective surfaces and at height of 1.2 meters (m). A specially adapted wind shield
was mounted on the microphone. An outdoor environmental noise enclosure protected the
equipment from the elements.
Plate 9-1 Example of noise meter set up (see also Appendix 9-B)
17924-6001-A Noise and Vibration March 2017
9-4
b) A Spectrum Data Logging Rain Gauge developed by Specware Technologies was used to
monitor rainfall rate throughout the measurement period. This data was logged in 10
minute intervals which were synchronised with the sound level meters. Measurements
should not be used from periods of heavy rainfall when noise levels will be high due to the
noise of the rain itself and more importantly due to the increased water flow in nearby
streams and rivers. For the purpose of this assessment where rain was recorded the data
point was removed.
Plate 9-2 Spectrum Rain Gauge Data Logger installed on site
c) Wind speed measurements were recorded using on site anemometry masts with
anemometers at varying heights which allowed for the determination of wind shear across
the site. The location of the anemometry mast can be seen on Figure 9-1.
17924-6001-A Noise and Vibration March 2017
9-5
9.1.4.2 Wind Farm Noise Predictions
The noise modelling software (Predictor, Version 7.1) is based on ISO 9613-2:1996 Acoustics –
Attenuation of sound during propagation outdoors – Part 2: General method of calculation. Research
has demonstrated that this standard in particular which is widely used in Ireland and the UK provides
realistic predictions of noise from on-shore wind turbines during worst case propagation conditions.
This software was used to predict wind farm noise at all dwellings within 1 kilometre of the
proposed wind turbines. The data input into the model was defined by the IOA GPG, 2013. The data
used in the model is conservative in particular as it assumes all dwellings are downwind of all
turbines simultaneously, which in practice cannot happen. For wind directions other than
downwind, noise levels will be lower. A safety margin of 2 dB(A) has been included in the results.
This accounts for the uncertainty in the measurement of the warranted wind turbine sound power
levels.
The predicted turbine noise LAeq has been adjusted by subtracting 2dB(A) to give the equivalent LA90
as suggested by ETSU-R-97.
Table 9-1 Model Input Data
Item Description
Turbine Nordex N117 3MW
Turbine Locations GPS Co-ordinates
House Locations Site Survey, Aerial Photography
Acoustic Emission Acoustic Specification Document
Hub Height 91 m
Topography Flat Earth
Ground Factor Mixed (0.5)Note 1
Receptor Height 4 m
Wind Direction Downwind
Relative Humidity 70%
Temperature 10⁰C
Note 1: The ground factor may be between 0 and 1, were 0 represents hard ground and 1 represents
soft ground. Hard ground reflects sound and soft ground absorbs it.
The sound power levels for the Nordex N117 3MW, with typical octave band data was obtained from
the Nordex Specification Document provided by Nordex and outlined in Table 9-2. This is not to say
that this will ultimately be the final turbine candidate. However it is representative of the size, noise
output and power generating capacity of the likely final turbine selection. Including the margin of
safety/ uncertainty of 2dB(A), a maximum sound power level or noise output of 107dB(A) has been
considered in this assessment.
17924-6001-A Noise and Vibration March 2017
9-6
Table 9-2 Nordex N117– Octave Banding and Sound Power Levels (SPL)
Wind Speed Octave Band (Hz)
63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000 SPL dB +2 dB
10 + m/s 83.5 90.5 95.3 96.9 99.8 98.7 96.3 86.2 105.0 107.0
9 m/s 83.5 90.5 95.3 96.9 99.8 98.7 96.3 86.2 105.0 107.0
8 m/s 83.5 90.5 95.3 96.9 99.8 98.7 96.3 86.2 105.0 107.0
7 m/s 83.5 90.2 95.1 96.6 99.1 98.0 95.9 86.1 104.5 106.5
6 m/s 81.8 88.9 93.2 95.1 97.9 97.6 96.2 84.7 103.5 105.5
5 m/s 79.1 90.4 90.6 92.4 95.3 95.8 94.2 83.0 101.5 103.5
4 m/s 74.6 85.9 86.1 87.9 90.8 91.3 89.7 78.5 97.0 99.0
3 m/s 71.6 82.9 83.1 85.9 87.8 88.3 86.7 75.5 94.0 96.0
Note 1: Source (F008_244_A04_EN, Revision 03)
Note 2: +2dB = Inclusion of safety margin
9.1.4.3 Noise Limits and Assessment Criteria
The noise limits applied to the nearest dwellings were adopted from the Department of the
Environment Heritage and Local Government– Wind Farm Energy Planning Guidelines (DoEHLG,
2006).
The impact of the construction works on the local dwellings has also been predicted. The
construction works will be of short duration. Higher noise limits apply to the construction works as
there must be a compromise between the practicality of construction and the temporary nature of
the works.
9.1.4.3.1 Operational Phase Limits
The limits set out in the Department of the Environment Heritage and Local Government (DoEHLG) –
Wind Farm Planning Guidelines were adopted for the purpose of this assessment. The noise limits
have been defined as shown in table 9-3.
Table 9-3 Day and Night Time Noise Limits
Daytime Night time
Where the prevailing background noise level is less than
30dB(A), the greater of 35 - 40dB(A) or plus 5dB above
background
Or
Where the prevailing background noise level is greater than
30dB the noise limits are the greater of 45dB(A) or plus
5dB(A) above background.
the greater of 43dB(A) or plus
5dB(A) above background
For the purpose of this assessment where the prevailing background noise level is less than 30dB(A),
the greater of 40dB LA90 or plus 5dB(A) above background has been adopted.
17924-6001-A Noise and Vibration March 2017
9-7
9.1.4.3.2 Construction Phase Limits
There are no mandatory noise limits for construction noise in Ireland. The most recent revision of BS
5228-1:2009 Code of practice for noise and vibration control on construction and open sites outlines
noise thresholds for significant impacts. These are outlined in Table 9-4.
Table 9-4 Threshold of significant effect at dwellings
Assessment category and threshold Value Period (LAeq) Threshold value in decibels (dBA)
Category A
Night time (23.00 – 07.00) 45
Evening and Weekends 55
Daytime (07.00 – 19.00) and Saturdays (07.00-13.00) 65
Table 9-5 can be used as follows: for the appropriate period (night, evening/weekends or day), the
ambient noise level is determined and rounded to the nearest 5 dB(A). This is then compared with
the total noise level, including construction. If the total noise level exceeds the appropriate category
value, then a significant effect is deemed to occur.
17924-6001-A Noise and Vibration March 2017
9-8
9.2 EXISTING ENVIRONMENT
This section describes the existing environment in terms of the noise monitoring locations and the
existing noise sources at these locations contributing to the existing prevailing background noise
levels.
The wind farm is to be developed in a rural area west of Ballydesmond Village, County Kerry. The
main sources of noise in the area and the existing noise environment include traffic on the local and
regional road network, agricultural activity, forestry related activity and other noise typically
associated with a rural location.
9.2.1 Noise Monitoring Locations
There are several one off houses in the vicinity of the wind farm. Given the spatial extent of the wind
farm noise monitoring was undertaken at 11 locations around the wind farm. A representative
dwelling, as the nearest to each turbine was selected. If the noise threshold criteria can be achieved
at these locations they will be achieved at locations further afield. Details of the noise monitoring
locations can be seen in Appendix 9-B. Noise predictions were undertaken for all dwellings within 1
km. The noise contour maps included in this report show all dwellings within 1 km.
The noise monitoring locations and all dwellings within 1km of the proposed wind turbines are
illustrated in figure 9-1.
17924-6001-A Noise and Vibration March 2017
9-9
Figure 9-1 Noise Monitoring Locations and Dwellings within 1 km
17924-6001-A Noise and Vibration March 2017
9-10
9.2.2 Derivation of Prevailing Background Noise
The variation in background noise level with wind speed was determined by correlating LA90,10min
noise measurements taken over a period of time with the average wind speeds measured over the
same 10-minute periods and then fitting a curve to this data. The derived regression line (line of best
fit) is the average background noise which occurs under different wind speed conditions. This
process was repeated for the day and night time periods. The graphs in Appendix 9-A illustrate the
prevailing background noise levels across a range of wind speeds as derived from the noise
monitoring period at each of the monitoring locations.
The purpose of data analysis is to provide a representative background noise level across a range of
wind speeds for the daytime amenity and Night time hours and thereby define appropriate noise
limits for a proposed wind energy development. ETSU-R-97 requires the filtering of noise, wind and
rain data for the Amenity and Night time hours.
Daytime Amenity hours are defined as Night time Hours are defined as:
18:00 – 23:00 hrs Monday to Friday 23:00 – 07:00 (weekend and weekday)
13:00 to 18:00 Saturday and 07:00 to 18:00 Sunday
The operational noise limit is derived from the prevailing background noise level. In accordance with
the guidelines the higher of either the lower fixed value (LA90, 45dB by day and 43dB by night) or
the 5 dB margin above the background is applied. At wind speeds where the existing background
noise level is below LA90 30 dB, a lower fixed daytime limit of LA90 40 dB is applied. The night time
lower limit remains fixed at LA90 43dB.
17924-6001-A Noise and Vibration March 2017
9-11
Table 9-5 Prevailing Daytime Background Noise Levels (45dB(A) or 5dB(A) above the background)
Location Operating Wind Speeds (m/s)
N1
Wind Speed (m/s) 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Prevailing
Background Noise
Level(LA90 dB)
27 29 32 34 37 40 43 46 49 53
Operational Limit
(LA90 dB) 40 40 45 45 45 45 48 51 54 58
N2
Wind Speed (m/s) 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Prevailing
Background Noise
(LA90 dB)
32 32 33 34 36 37 39 41 42 45
Operational Limit
(LA90 dB) 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 46 47 50
N3
Wind Speed (m/s) 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Prevailing
Background Noise
(LA90 dB)
29 30 32 34 36 39 41 44 47 50
Operational Limit
(LA90 dB) 40 45 45 45 45 44 46 49 52 55
N4
Wind Speed (m/s) 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Prevailing
Background Noise
(LA90 dB)
31 32 33 34 36 38 40 43 46 49
Operational Limit
(LA90 dB) 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 48 51 54
N5
Wind Speed (m/s) 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Prevailing
Background Noise
(LA90 dB)
28 28 30 31 36 38 39 42 46 50
Operational Limit
(LA90 dB) 40 40 45 45 45 45 45 47 51 55
N6
Wind Speed (m/s) 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Prevailing
Background Noise
(LA90 dB)
33 33 34 35 36 38 40 42 45 48
Operational Limit
(LA90 dB) 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 47 50 53
N7 Wind Speed (m/s) 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
17924-6001-A Noise and Vibration March 2017
9-12
Prevailing
Background Noise
(LA90 dB)
29 29 31 32 34 34 37 40 42 45
Operational Limit
(LA90 dB) 40 40 45 45 45 45 45 45 47 50
N8
Wind Speed (m/s) 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Prevailing
Background Noise
(LA90 dB)
35 35 36 36 38 39 41 42 44 47
Operational Limit
(LA90 dB) 45 45 45 45 45 45 46 47 49 52
N9
Wind Speed (m/s) 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Prevailing
Background Noise
(LA90 dB)
33 33 33 34 35 36 38 40 42 44
Operational Limit
(LA90 dB) 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 47 49
N10
Wind Speed (m/s) 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Prevailing
Background Noise
(LA90 dB)
32 34 36 38 40 44 46 50 53 57
Operational Limit
(LA90 dB) 45 45 45 45 45 49 51 55 58 62
N11
Wind Speed (m/s) 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Prevailing
Background Noise
(LA90 dB)
32 32 34 34 36 37 40 42 44 47
Operational Limit
(LA90 dB) 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 47 49 52
17924-6001-A Noise and Vibration March 2017
9-13
Table 9-6 Prevailing Night Background Noise Levels (43 dB or 5dB above the background)
Location Operating Wind Speeds (m/s)
N1
Wind Speed (m/s) 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Prevailing
Background Noise
Level(LA90 dB)
23 27 31 34 38 41 41 44 49 52
Operational Limit
(LA90 dB) 43 43 43 43 43 46 46 49 54 57
N2
Wind Speed (m/s) 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Prevailing
Background Noise
(LA90 dB)
33 34 35 36 36 37 38 38 38 38
Operational Limit
(LA90 dB) 43 43 43 43 43 43 43 43 43 43
N3
Wind Speed (m/s) 23 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Prevailing
Background Noise
(LA90 dB)
23 26 28 31 34 36 39 42 45 48
Operational Limit
(LA90 dB) 43 43 43 43 43 43 44 47 50 53
N4
Wind Speed (m/s) 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Prevailing
Background Noise
(LA90 dB)
25 27 30 32 34 37 40 43 46 49
Operational Limit
(LA90 dB) 43 43 43 43 43 43 45 48 51 54
N5
Wind Speed (m/s) 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Prevailing
Background Noise
(LA90 dB)
22 24 26 29 32 35 39 42 46 51
Operational Limit
(LA90 dB) 43 43 43 43 43 43 44 47 51 56
N6
Wind Speed (m/s) 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Prevailing
Background Noise
(LA90 dB)
29 30 31 33 35 37 39 42 45 48
Operational Limit
(LA90 dB) 43 43 43 43 43 43 44 47 50 53
N7 Wind Speed (m/s) 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
17924-6001-A Noise and Vibration March 2017
9-14
Prevailing
Background Noise
(LA90 dB)
25 27 30 32 34 37 37 39 42 46
Operational Limit
(LA90 dB) 43 43 43 43 43 43 43 44 47 51
N8
Wind Speed (m/s) 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Prevailing
Background Noise
(LA90 dB)
28 29 30 32 33 35 38 40 43 46
Operational Limit
(LA90 dB) 43 43 43 43 43 43 43 45 48 51
N9
Wind Speed (m/s) 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Prevailing
Background Noise
(LA90 dB)
27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 42 44
Operational Limit
(LA90 dB) 43 43 43 43 43 43 44 46 47 49
N10
Wind Speed (m/s) 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Prevailing
Background Noise
(LA90 dB)
26 31 33 34 36 40 44 47 52 57
Operational Limit
(LA90 dB) 43 43 43 43 43 45 49 52 57 62
N11
Wind Speed (m/s) 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Prevailing
Background Noise
(LA90 dB)
24 26 28 30 32 35 38 41 44 47
Operational Limit
(LA90 dB) 43 43 43 43 43 43 43 46 49 52
17924-6001-A Noise and Vibration March 2017
9-15
9.3 LIKELY SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS
9.3.1 Operational Phase of Predicted Results
Noise from the wind farm was predicted at the eleven noise monitoring locations at the greatest
sound power level to represent worst case scenario conditions. A review of the Nordex 117/3000
Acoustic Specification Document (F008_244_A04_EN) states that this is 105.0 dB(A) and occurs at 8
m/s. A further 2 dB has been added to this sound power level in accordance with best practice as a
margin of safety to account for uncertainty when the turbine sound power levels are measured. This
results in a total worst case noise emission of 107dB(A).
Table 9-7 Operational Daytime Noise Immission Levels and Limit Values
Wind
Speed
(m/s)
Operational Noise Immission Levels (LA90 dB)
N1
Day
Lim
it
N2
Day
Lim
it
N3
Day
Lim
it
N4
Day
Lim
it
N5
Day
Lim
it
N6 D
ay L
imit
N7
Day
Lim
it
N8
Day
Lim
it
N9
Day
Lim
it
N10
Day
Lim
it
N11
Day
Lim
it
3 27 40 27 45 30 40 28 45 31 40 29 45 28 40 29 45 30 45 29 45 29 45
4 30 40 30 45 33 45 31 45 34 40 32 45 31 40 32 45 33 45 33 45 32 45
5 35 45 34 45 38 45 35 45 39 45 37 45 36 45 37 45 38 45 38 45 36 45
6 37 45 37 45 40 45 38 45 41 45 39 45 39 45 39 45 39 45 40 45 38 45
7 38 45 38 45 42 45 39 45 42 45 40 45 39 45 40 45 41 45 42 45 40 45
8 39 45 38 45 42 44 39 45 43 45 41 45 40 45 41 45 42 45 42 49 40 45
9 39 48 38 45 42 46 39 45 43 45 41 45 40 45 41 46 42 45 42 51 40 45
10 39 51 38 46 42 49 39 48 43 47 41 47 40 45 41 47 42 45 42 55 40 47
11 39 54 38 47 42 52 39 51 43 51 41 50 40 47 41 49 42 47 42 58 40 49
12 39 58 38 50 42 55 39 54 43 55 41 53 40 50 41 52 42 49 42 62 40 52
Table 9-7 presents the noise immission levels (noise from turbines at receiver/noise sensitive
location) at each wind speed compared to the day time operational limit. It can be seen that noise
from the wind farm is predicted not to exceed the derived operational day time limits at any of the
selected representative locations. This indicates that a wind turbine with similar acoustic
characteristics to the one used for the purpose of this assessment as a likely candidate will operate
within the day time noise limit thresholds set down in the wind energy planning guidelines.
17924-6001-A Noise and Vibration March 2017
9-16
Table 9-8 Operational Night time Noise Immission Levels and Limit Values
Wind
Speed
(m/s)
Operational Noise Immission Levels (LA90 dB)
N1
Nig
ht
Lim
it
N2
Nig
ht
Lim
it
N3
Nig
ht
Lim
it
N4
Nig
ht
Lim
it
N5
Nig
ht
Lim
it
N6
Nig
ht
Lim
it
N7
Nig
ht
Lim
it
N8
Nig
ht
Lim
it
N9
Nig
ht
Lim
it
N10
Nig
ht
Lim
it
N11
Nig
ht
Lim
it
3 27 43 27 43 30 43 28 43 31 43 29 43 28 43 29 43 30 43 29 43 29 43
4 30 43 30 43 33 43 31 43 34 43 32 43 31 43 32 43 33 43 33 43 32 43
5 35 43 34 43 38 43 35 43 39 43 37 43 36 43 37 43 38 43 38 43 36 43
6 37 43 37 43 40 43 38 43 41 43 39 43 39 43 39 43 39 43 40 43 38 43
7 38 43 38 43 42 43 39 43 42 43 40 43 39 43 40 43 41 43 42 43 40 43
8 39 46 38 43 42 43 39 43 43 43 41 43 40 43 41 43 42 43 42 43 40 43
9 39 46 38 43 42 44 39 45 43 44 41 44 40 43 41 43 42 44 42 49 40 43
10 39 49 38 43 42 47 39 48 43 47 41 47 40 44 41 45 42 46 42 52 40 46
11 39 54 38 43 42 50 39 51 43 51 41 50 40 47 41 48 42 47 42 57 40 49
12 39 57 38 43 42 53 39 54 43 56 41 53 40 51 41 51 42 49 42 62 40 52
Table 9-8 presents the noise emission levels (noise from turbines at receiver/house) at each wind
speed compared to the night time operational limit. It can be seen that noise from the wind farm is
predicted not to exceed the derived operational night time limits at any of the selected
representative locations. This indicates that a wind turbine with similar acoustic characteristics to
the one used for the purpose of this assessment as a likely candidate will operate within the night
time noise limit thresholds set down in the wind energy planning guidelines.
9.3.2 Substation
The proposed southern substation is located at approximately 180 m from the landowner’s house.
The main noise source from the proposed substation will come from the external transformer. For
the purpose of this assessment a noise measurement was taken from a representative substation. A
noise level of 60 dB(A) was measured at 5m, which would result in a worst case of 30 dB at 180 m.
This is unlikely to be audible above existing background noise levels and is below typical night time
noise limit criteria even with a +5dB(A) penalty for the nature of the sound from the transformer.
17924-6001-A Noise and Vibration March 2017
9-17
9.3.3 Cumulative Impact
There is a permitted wind farm comprising of 15 turbines, under construction, approximately 650 m
west of the proposed Silverbirch Wind Farm. There are two turbines operating at the Munster
Joinery facility approximately 2 km east of the proposed Silverbirch Wind Farm. All other wind farms
in the area (whether existing or permitted but not yet constructed) were assessed and determined
to have no additional impact. A cumulative impact scenario was considered in order to quantify the
cumulative impact of all these wind turbines in operation at the same time.
The additional modelling scenario considered the loudest noise emission wind speed for each
turbine, therefore presenting the worst case scenario. If the noise limit criteria can be achieved
under the cumulative worst case conditions, then there will be no significant cumulative impact.
Table 9-9 Cumulative Operational Daytime Noise Immission Levels and Limit Values
Wind
Speed
(m/s)
Operational Noise Immission Levels (LA90 dB)
N1
Day
Lim
it
N2
Day
Lim
it
N3
Day
Lim
it
N4
Day
Lim
it
N5
Day
Lim
it
N6 D
ay L
imit
N7
Day
Lim
it
N8
Day
Lim
it
N9
Day
Lim
it
N10
Day
Lim
it
N11
Day
Lim
it
8 39 45 39 45 42 44 40 45 44 45 42 45 42 45 41 45 42 45 42 49 41 45
9 39 48 39 45 42 46 40 45 44 45 42 45 42 46 41 46 42 45 42 51 41 45
10 39 51 39 46 42 49 40 48 44 47 42 47 42 47 41 47 42 45 42 55 41 47
11 39 54 39 47 42 53 40 51 44 51 42 50 42 49 41 49 42 47 42 58 41 49
12 39 58 39 50 42 55 40 54 44 55 42 53 42 53 41 53 42 49 42 62 41 52
Table 9-10 Cumulative Operational Night time Noise Immission Levels and Limit Values
Wind
Speed
(m/s)
Operational Noise Immission Levels (LA90 dB)
N1
Nig
ht
Lim
it
N2
Nig
ht
Lim
it
N3
Nig
ht
Lim
it
N4
Nig
ht
Lim
it
N5
Nig
ht
Lim
it
N6
Nig
ht
Lim
it
N7
Nig
ht
Lim
it
N8
Nig
ht
Lim
it
N9
Nig
ht
Lim
it
N10 N
igh
t Li
mit
N11
Nig
ht
Lim
it
8 39 46 39 43 42 43 40 43 44 43 42 43 42 43 41 43 42 43 42 43 41 43
9 39 46 39 43 42 44 40 45 44 44 42 44 42 43 41 43 42 44 42 49 41 43
10 39 49 39 43 42 47 40 48 44 47 42 47 42 44 41 45 42 46 42 52 41 46
11 39 51 39 43 42 48 40 51 44 51 42 50 42 47 41 48 42 47 42 57 41 49
12 39 57 39 43 42 53 40 54 44 56 42 53 42 51 41 51 42 49 42 62 41 52
The results show that the night time limit may be exceeded at N5 at 8 m/s under downwind
conditions. At wind speeds below 8 m/s the night time limit is achieved, and at wind speeds above 8
m/s the night time limit will be achieved as background noise levels will begin to mask the noise. By
operating T5 in a -2dB noise reduced mode under downwind conditions at 8 m/s the noise limit at
N5 can be achieved. The consent of the landowner can also be provided for the location in question.
The results presented in tables 9-9 to 9-10, are worst case scenario and include a safety margin of 2
dB(A). In reality noise levels are likely to be lower than those presented.
17924-6001-A Noise and Vibration March 2017
9-18
Figures 9-2 and 9-3 below illustrate the worst case noise emissions for the Silverbirch wind farm
stand alone and in combination with other wind turbines in the area. All dwellings within 1 km are
included in the calculation.
17924-6001-A Noise and Vibration March 2017
9-19
Figure 9-2 Stand Alone Worst Case Noise Emissions
17924-6001-A Noise and Vibration March 2017
9-20
Figure 9-3 Cumulative Worst Case Noise Emissions
17924-6001-A Noise and Vibration March 2017
9-21
9.3.4 Potential for Tonal Content
A tone can be described as an identifiable characteristic from a particular sound. It can be commonly
described as a whine hum, hiss or screech. Such characteristics incur an additional acoustic penalty
to the wind turbine noise emission. Typically wind turbines are broadband in nature and there are
no clearly audible tones when operating normally, therefore no penalty has been included.
9.3.5 Vibration and Low Frequency Noise
To date there is no published evidence to suggest a direct link between wind farms and effects on
health. The main publications supporting these views include.
Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) July 2010
“There is currently no published scientific evidence to positively link wind turbines with adverse
health effects”.
Wind Turbine Sound and Health Effects - An Expert Panel Review - American Wind Energy
Association and Canadian Wind Energy Association December 2009
“There is no evidence that the audible or sub-audible sounds emitted by wind turbines have any
direct adverse physiological effects.
The ground-borne vibrations from wind turbines are too weak to be detected by, or to affect,
humans.
The sounds emitted by wind turbines are not unique. There is no reason to believe, based on the
levels and frequencies of the sounds and the panel’s experience with sound exposures in occupational
settings, that the sounds from wind turbines could plausibly have direct adverse health
consequences.”
Renewable UK - Wind Turbine Syndrome - An independent review of the state of
knowledge about the alleged health condition July 2010
“There is no reason to believe that the sounds from wind turbines could plausibly have direct adverse
health consequence”
Spatio-temporal differences in the history of health and noise complaints about
Australian wind farms: evidence for the psychogenic, “communicated disease”
hypothesis. Professor Simon Chapman, University of Sydney, 2013
The paper published in the peer reviewed New Scientist concluded “In view of scientific consensus
that the evidence for wind turbine noise and infrasound causing health problems is poor, the reported
17924-6001-A Noise and Vibration March 2017
9-22
spatio-temporal variations in complaints are consistent with psychogenic hypotheses that health
problems arising are “communicated diseases” with nocebo effects likely to play an important role in
the aetiology of complaints”.
Systematic review of the human health effects of wind farms, Australian Government
National Health and Research Centre, 2014
This independent review of the literature was commissioned by the National Health and Medical
Research Council (NHMRC) to determine whether there is an association between exposure to wind
farms and human health effects. The review was undertaken by independent reviewers from
Adelaide Health Technology Assessment and the development of the review was guided by NHMRC’s
Wind Farms and Human Health Reference Group.
Direct evidence of any health effects was obtained through a systematic literature review of all the
available evidence on exposure to the physical emissions produced by wind turbines. The emissions
investigated were: noise, shadow flicker and the electromagnetic radiation (EMR) produced by wind
turbines.
A background literature review was also undertaken to establish whether there is basic biological
evidence, or evidence from research into other circumstances of human exposure to the physical
emissions that wind turbines produce, that makes it plausible that wind turbines cause adverse
health effects.
Before the review was finalised, an international expert organisation (independent from the
reviewers) assessed the methodology and quality of the systematic review to ensure it was
conducted in a robust and transparent manner.
Source (https://www.nhmrc.gov.au/guidelines/publications/eh54)
It concluded: “The evidence considered does not support the conclusion that wind turbines have
direct adverse effects on human health, as the criteria for causation have not been fulfilled”.
Wind Health Impacts Dismissed in Court, Mike Barnard, Energy and Policy Institute, August
2014.
In this report, Mike Barnard at the Energy and Policy Institute, catalogues the outcomes of 49
attempts by wind farm opponents to use the courts or tribunals to stop developments. The
report concluded that the courts dismissed all but one of the cases and that case is an outlier
and circumstantial. The report goes on to state: The courts have spoken. Wind Farms do not
cause health problems.
17924-6001-A Noise and Vibration March 2017
9-23
9.3.6 Amplitude Modulation
The Institute of Acoustics (IOA) in their report titled A Method for Rating Amplitude Modulation in
Wind Turbine Noise published in August 2016, define Amplitude Modulation as:
periodic fluctuations in the level of audible noise from a wind turbine (or wind turbines), the
frequency of the fluctuations being related to the blade passing frequency of the turbine rotor(s).
This characteristic of the sound might be described by a listener as a regular ‘swish’, ‘whoomph’ or
‘thump’, depending on the cause and the severity of the modulation.
There is currently no recognised limit for AM in Ireland or the UK. However, instances of nuisance
arising from AM are rare and, where it has been found to occur, it is limited to very specific sites in
limited wind conditions. AM can be addressed to remove the impacts at a given location by
controlling one or more turbines in the very limited wind conditions where it is found to occur. The
IOA have developed a Reference Methodology for the measurement and rating of AM which can be
used to rate and evaluate complaints, should any arise, and ensure they are adequately mitigated to
remove impacts.
Silverbirch Wind Farm has provided a commitment (see the mitigation section below) to control
turbines such that any issues arising from AM which are evaluated by the IOA Reference
Methodology to be a nuisance will be removed.
9.3.7 Construction Phase
The construction phase entails the building of the wind farm infrastructure including mainly, roads,
hardstandings, turbine bases, drainage system, substations and control buildings and borrow pits.
The main noise sources include heavy machinery and support equipment used to construct the
various elements. This typically means heavy earth moving machinery, generators and material
transport trucks. For the purpose of assessing the likely construction phase impacts, the construction
phase has been separated into two separate categories, 1) General Construction Activities, and 2)
Construction Traffic.
9.3.8 General Construction Activities
This category includes the noise associated with construction and earth moving plant such as
diggers, dumpers and delivery trucks. The construction of the wind farm will be phased and not all
activity will be taking place simultaneously.
The construction of linear infrastructure such as roads and cable trenches is such that it moves along
quickly and plant and machinery do not remain in the one location for long periods of time. The
construction of the substations and turbine bases will require noisy items of plant and machinery to
remain in a fixed location for longer.
17924-6001-A Noise and Vibration March 2017
9-24
At this stage of the proposal exact details on the number and type of machinery required are not
available. However enough information is available to accurately estimate the likely construction
equipment required.
Table 9-11 below is a typical list of plant and machinery involved in wind farm construction activities.
The noise levels from the equipment identified above have been sourced from BS5228 Noise
Database for Noise and Vibration Control on Construction and Open Sites-1:2008+A1 2014.
17924-6001-A Noise and Vibration March 2017
9-25
Table 9-11 Sound Power Frequency Data for Typical Construction Plant Machinery
Plant and Machinery Octave Banding (Hz)
Sound
Power
Level
dB(A)
Sound
Pressure Level
@10mdB(A) 63 125 250 500 1k 2k 4k 8k
Telescopic Handler 86.8 86.9 85.4 92.8 98 96.2 88 78.9 102 71
Mobile Crane 84.8 90.9 93.4 90.8 95.0 95.2 88.0 79.9 101 70
30-50T Excavator (x2) 89.8 92.9 99.4 104.8 104 103.2 100 92.9 110 79
15-30T Excavator (x4) 99.8 98.9 104.1 100.8 101 100.2 96 86.9 109 78
12T Roller (x2) 94.8 98.9 99.4 108.8 104 100.2 97 90.9 111 80
Dump truck (x5) 89.8 94.9 99.4 98.8 105 102.2 97 87.9 109 78
Tractor & Trailer (x4) 97.8 100.9 98.4 103.8 104 104.2 96 88.9 110 79
15-20T Rubber Tired
Excavator 78.8 80.9 86.4 91.8 94 92.2 91 79.9 99
68
Erection and Assist
Crane (x2) 70.8 85.9 90.4 89.8 97 98.2 87 75.9 102
71
3-10T mini digger 85.8 86.9 90.4 90 95.0 90 92 84.9 100 69
Rock Breaker 83.8 96.9 103.4 109.8 117 118.2 118 114.9 123 92
Diesel Generator 84.8 88.9 79.4 81.8 84 80.2 77 66.9 92 61
The estimated programme of works for construction indicates an 18 to 24 month period. The
construction works will be sequenced and all the noise sources presented in Table 9-11 will not be in
operation continuously for the duration of the construction phase. However adopting a conservative
approach it has been assumed that they will.
The decibel sum of all of the items of plant listed above totals 94dBA at 10 metres. Using the inverse
square law rule (In decibel terms a doubling (or halving) of sound intensity corresponds to an
increase (or reduction) of 6dB) we can deduce the sound pressure level, or noise impact, as follows:
94dB at 10m
88dB at 20m
82dB at 40m
76dB at 80m
70dB at 160m
64dB at 320m
58dB at 640m
The results of the construction noise predictions indicate that the appropriate construction noise
limit (65dB (A)) as outlined in BS5228-1:2009 will not be exceeded beyond 320 m. Considering that
there are no items of permanent fixed wind farm infrastructure (i.e. turbine/ substation/ control
building) within 450m of any dwelling it is predicted that construction phase noise will not exceed
recommended limits during turbine or ancillary buildings construction. Considering the conservative
nature of the prediction calculation (i.e. attenuation due to distance only and all machinery in
17924-6001-A Noise and Vibration March 2017
9-26
operation simultaneously) it is predicted that road construction will not exceed the construction
noise limit at any location.
9.3.8.1 Substation Construction
Two substations form part of the overall development. The main substation at Ballynahulla is more
than 600 m from the nearest dwelling, and in accordance with the calculations presented in section
4.3.1, the noise impact will not be significant. The substation at Tooreengarriv is approximately 180
m from the nearest dwelling. The main item of plant and machinery likely to be involved at any one
time is an excavator. Noise immission levels at 160m from such an item of plant is 56 dB(A). The
construction of this piece of infrastructure will be of relatively short duration and in that regard, in
combination with the likely noise emission, the noise impact from the construction of this substation
is not considered significant.
9.3.8.2 Borrow Pits
Three borrow pits will be required for the purpose of providing a supply of stone for the wind farm
construction. The operation of the borrow-pit is likely to potentially have a rock breaker, one large
(30-50T) excavator and one smaller (15-30T) excavator as well as two to three dump trucks
operational at any one time. The decibel sum of these sources at 10m is approximately 93 dB,
reducing to 69 dB at 160m, and 63 dB at 320m.
Borrow pit No 3 at Ballynahulla is approximately 270 m from the closest dwelling located to the
north east of same. When the rock breaker is in operation noise levels may potentially exceed the 65
dB(A) construction noise threshold. However while the rock breaker is not in operation, the
construction noise threshold will not be exceeded. In order to reduce the noise levels the operation
of the rock breaker will be kept to a minimum. Further the working face of the borrow pit will be
used as a barrier to noise propagation towards the nearest dwelling.
There is sufficient separation distance between the nearest dwellings and Borrow Pit No. 1 (500 m)
and No. 2 (460 m) to ensure that the construction noise thresholds are not exceeded.
9.3.8.3 Cable Trench/ Jointing Bays
Works along the public road including cable trenching, construction of cable jointing bays and
junction modifications will be of limited duration and only involve limited plant so noise from these
elements of the works are not anticipated to have a significant impact on nearby dwellings along
these sections of the public road.
17924-6001-A Noise and Vibration March 2017
9-27
9.3.9 Construction Traffic
On a wind farm the most intense period of construction traffic activity takes place during the pouring
of the concrete for the turbine bases. This is because all the concrete required for a turbine base
must be poured on a single day. A base pour may generate up to 12 HGV (Heavy Goods Vehicles)
movements per hour. Using a conservative approach it is assumed that there will be a further 6
HGVs per hour for other miscellaneous activities.
For mobile items of plant that pass at intervals it is possible to predict an equivalent continuous
sound level using the following expression for predicting LAeq alongside a haul road used by single
engine items of mobile plant:
LAeq = Lwa – 33 + 10log10Q – 10log10V – 10log10d,
Where
Lwa is the sound power of the plant in decibels (dB);
Q is the number of vehicles per hour;
V is the average vehicle speed, in kilometres per hour (km/h)
d is the distance of receiving position from the centre of the haul road, in metres (m)
Therefore
LAeq = 118Note 1 – 33 + 10Log 18 – 10log50 – 10log20 = 67dB.
Note 1: Source, Maximum drive by sound power level (Table C.2 BS 5228 Part 1).
The averaged LAeq over the course of an hour from passing HGV’s (as calculated above) is predicted
to be 67dBA. The base pours will only occur 14 times (14 turbines) and typically these days do not
occur concurrently. In that regard the noise impact from the HGV concrete deliveries is not
considered significant. The noise levels are typical of any HGV traffic which already uses the road.
17924-6001-A Noise and Vibration March 2017
9-28
9.4 MITIGATION
The computer modelling software has predicted that at one wind speed the night time limit could be
exceeded at one location and for only one particular wind speed, assuming the neighbouring wind
farm is constructed and operational prior to the Silverbirch wind farm. The result is likely an
overestimate (due to conservatisms built into the model) and in reality the limit is unlikely to be
exceeded at this location. However for the purpose of satisfying this outcome, operating wind
turbine T5 in a -2dB noise reduced mode when wind speeds are at 8 m/s at night, under downwind
conditions will bring noise immission levels at the receiver in line with the night time limit criteria,
should this be required. However, the dwelling in question is owed by a landowner who has an
economic interest in the project and who has provided consent to the resulting noise levels.
Best practice in the form of BS5228 –1&2:2009 + A1 2014, Code of Practice for the Control of Noise
and Vibration on Construction and Open Sites will be adopted during the construction phase in order
to minimise the noise generated by construction activities and nuisance to neighbours.
9.4.1 Mitigation for Amplitude Modulation
If a complaint of Amplitude Modulation arises during the operation of the Wind Farm, an
investigation into the phenomenon will be carried out in accordance with best practice. If required,
mitigation measures will be put in place to eliminate any nuisance that is found to occur. These
mitigation measures will be applied during the specific meteorological conditions which causes the
AM to happen and involve one or more of the following:
slowing down or stopping the relevant wind turbine.
altering the pitch of the blades (i.e. changing the amount of rotation of the blade along its
length).
realigning the yaw of the rotor (i.e. changing the angle at which the turbine rotor faces into
the wind).
9.5 RESIDUAL IMPACTS
While noise from wind turbines may be audible at certain locations under certain meteorological
conditions, noise levels are not predicted to exceed the DoEHLG Wind Energy Planning Assessment
Criteria designed for the protection of residential amenity.
9.6 CONCLUSION
An assessment of the likely noise impact of the proposed Silverbirch Wind Farm has been carried
out.
17924-6001-A Noise and Vibration March 2017
9-29
Typical downwind turbine noise levels at all locations within or just outside one kilometre of the
proposed wind turbines have been predicted based on provided sound power level data for a
Nordex N117 3MW wind turbine. At this stage, the turbine candidate is subject to change, as the
procurement process will not take place until planning permission has been secured. It is standard
practice to base predictions on a candidate model, in this instance the Nordex N117 3MW. This
turbine is indicative of the size and noise output of the turbine under consideration for the site.
Ultimately the most appropriate turbine and operating modes will be selected in order to ensure
that the operational limits specified in this report are not exceeded.
The assessment has been carried out with reference to methodology outlined in ETSU-R-97,
Assessment and Rating of Noise from Wind Farms and results have been compared against noise
levels outlined in the Irish wind farm planning guidelines.
The results show that the predicted wind farm noise levels can adhere to the assessment criteria and
in particular, the DoEHLG Wind Farm Planning Guidelines.