synthesis and properties of ti-mor molecular sieve on the oxidation of cyclohexene: influence of the...
TRANSCRIPT
Synthesis and properties of Ti-MOR molecular sieve on the
oxidation of cyclohexene: Influence of the Ti source
Romilda Fernandez, Dilson Cardoso *
Department of Chemical Engineering, Universidade Federal de S. Carlos, P.O. Box 676, 13565-905 S. Carlos, Brazil
Available online 12 September 2005
Abstract
The incorporation of Ti in a molecular sieve having aMFI structure has generated a newmaterial, TS-1. This newmaterial is very active for
the oxidation of organic compounds in the liquid phase, using H2O2 as oxidizing agent. However, TS-1 has medium diameter micropores,
which adversely affects the diffusion of molecules with kinetic diameters larger than 5.5 A. This limitation has provided a challenge for
researchers to develop titanium-silicates with larger pore diameter. The purpose of this study is to compare physical–chemical and catalytic
properties of Ti-MOR synthesized through Ti(OC2H5)4 (TEOT) and H2TiF6 as Ti sources. The results showed the formation of a MOR
structure using the H2TiF6 as the Ti source. The incorporation of Ti to Ti-MOR structure synthesized using H2TiF6 is lower than for TEOT,
however with a larger formation of pentacoordinated Ti in the framework. The Ti species incorporated to the catalyst synthesized using
H2TiF6 are more active for the oxidation of cyclohexene than TEOT. However a sample synthesized with TEOT provides a higher selectivity
for the formation of cyclohexene oxide.
# 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Ti-MOR; TEOT; H2TiF6; Oxidation of cyclohexene
www.elsevier.com/locate/cattod
Catalysis Today 107–108 (2005) 844–848
1. Introduction
The incorporation of Ti to the framework of a molecular
sieve with MFI structure, which was first accomplished by
researchers from Enichem in 1983, opened a new research
area for redox catalysis [1]. The titanium-silicate obtained
was called TS-1. Results have demonstrated that tetrahedrally
co-ordinated Ti atoms are responsible for the behaviour seen
during oxidation of organic substrates, when hydrogen
peroxide is used as an oxidazing agent [2]. Since then,
titanium-silicates have received the interest of researchers due
to the fact that they can be used in the oxidation of organic
compounds with the use of oxidazing agents having a low
environmental impact. For this reason, these catalysts can be
efficiently employed in the so-called ‘‘clean processes’’.
TS-1 is the most widely studied titanium-silicate.
However, due to the small size of its pores (5.5 A diameter),
the use of TS-1 is limited to reactions that make use of
* Corresponding author. Fax: +55 16 3351 8266.
E-mail address: [email protected] (D. Cardoso).
0920-5861/$ – see front matter # 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.cattod.2005.07.020
organic compounds with a larger kinetic diameter. This
limitation has provided an incentive for researchers to
develop titanium-silicates with larger pore diameter (e.g. Ti-
Beta [3], TS-2 [4] and Ti-MCM-41 [5]).
Another molecular sieve that has large pore diameter
(dp � 7 A) and permits the incorporation of Ti to its
framework is mordenite. The incorporation of Ti to MOR
structurehas been carried out byhydrothermal synthesis using
tetraethyl orthotitanate (TEOT) as a Ti source. TEOT is an
expensive compound and is difficult to handle because it
hydrolyses easily [6,7]. However, Jahn et al. have successfully
performed the synthesis of Ti-Beta, using a cheaper andmore
stable Ti source, hexafluorotitanic acid (H2TiF6) [8].
The present studies are designed to synthesize Ti-MOR
with H2TiF6 as Ti source and compare them with those
synthesized with TEOT. This will be done to verify the
influence of the two different Ti sources on the properties of
the materials formed. In addition, the catalysts will be tested
for the oxidation of cyclohexene using hydrogen peroxide as
the oxidazing agent so that their catalytic properties can also
be compared.
R. Fernandez, D. Cardoso / Catalysis Today 107–108 (2005) 844–848 845
Fig. 1. Diffractograms from samples containing 0 and 2% Ti.
Table 1
Crystallinity level and chemical composition of catalysts
Sample Crystallinity
(%)
Chemical composition
100 � PTi 100 � PAl 100 � PSi Al/Ti Na/Al
M00 100 0.0 23.6 76.4 1 1.0
Ac02 54 0.6 13.3 86.1 22.2 1.0
T02 78 1.2 29.4 69.4 24.5 1.2
PTi = molar fraction of Ti in solid = Ti/(Ti + Si + Al); similar for PAl and
PSi.
2. Experimental
2.1. Synthesis
The synthesis of Ti-MOR was based on the method of
Chandwadkar et al. [6], while changing the Ti source and the
pH control. The reaction mixture contains colloidal silica
(30% SiO2—Nalco 1030) as the Si source, which was slowly
added pseudoboehmite (Catapal B) as Al source. Then, the
Na source (NaOH—diluted in half the volume of water
needed for the total synthesis) was added. At this point 1,4-
diazabicyclo[2,2,2] octane (DABCO, Aldrich, diluted in the
remaining water), used as template, was added to the
mixture. Finally, the Ti source (H2TiF6 60% or TEOT,
Aldrich) was added. The mixture was stirred for 5 h at room
temperature, and then pH was adjusted to pH � 13.7 by
dropping addition of concentrated NaOH (10 M). The
composition of the reaction mixture with Si/Al ratio = 3.75
and 2% Ti, is given by:
0:150 TiO2: 7:5 SiO2: Al2O3: DABCO :
1:35Na2O : 110H2O:
Reaction mixtures were placed in PTFE cylinders, which
were previously conditioned in stainless steel autoclaves, and
crystallized at 160 8C for periods of time ranging from 120 to
168 h. Formed solids were washed until a pH of �9 was
reached, then filtered and dried at 110 8C. To remove the
template, the sampleswere calcinated at 540 8C in an inert and
then oxidant atmosphere, as previously described [9]. In order
to reduce Na content and leave the catalyst in the protonic
form, the samples were subjected to ion exchange with a
solution of NH4Cl (1 M) at 90 8C. The ammonium cations
were eliminated by calcination in an oxidant atmosphere.
2.2. Characterization
After calcination, the materials were characterized by the
following techniques: (a) X-ray diffraction (Siemens DCC
50) using Cu Ka radiation, 40 kV, 40 mA and 2u in the rangeof 2–408 at a scan-rate of 28/min; (b) plasma emission induced
spectroscopy (Varian-Spectra AA640) for determination of
the ofAl,Na andTi content in the solid; (c) thermogravimetric
measurements (SDTSimultaneousDSC-TGA) in the range of
25–900 8C, at 10 8C/m increment and 100 mL/min air follow,
using 20 mgof the original sample; and (d) diffuse reflectance
UV–vis spectroscopy, in the region of 200–400 nm. TheUV–
vis spectroscopy was carried out in a Varian Cary 5
spectrometer using a constant mass of 50 mg.
2.3. Catalytic tests
The catalysts, in a protonic form, had their performance
assessed in the oxidation of cyclohexene, using hydrogen
peroxide as the oxidazing agent. Catalytic activity tests were
performed using 20 mmoles of cyclohexene, 5 mmoles of
hydrogen peroxide, 100 mg of catalyst and 30 mL of
acetonitrile (solvent). Oxidation was carried out at 60 8C for
up to 4 h. Products were analysed by gas chromatography
(Varian model 3400) with a flame ionisation detector and a
capillary column.
3. Results and discussion
3.1. Catalysts characterization
Fig. 1 shows XRD patterns of solids containing 2% Ti
synthesized from TEOT (sample T02), or H2TiF6 (sample
Ac02) as theTi source andwith 0%Ti (sampleM00). Samples
M00 and T02 were hydrothermally treated for 120 h, and
sample Ac02 for 168 h of crystallization. Samples’ XRD
shows peaks that are characteristic of mordenite, thus
confirming the formation of the MOR structure.
Incorporation of Ti to MOR structure reduces peak
intensity. This suggests that Ti absorbs X-ray more intensely
or that incorporating Ti reduces the development of MOR
structure and therefore decreases the level of crystallinity
(Table 1). From these results crystallinity decrease is
stronger when H2TiF6 is used as the Ti source.
Table 1 also shows results from the chemical analysis
carried out on the samples having 0 and 2% Ti (M00, T02
R. Fernandez, D. Cardoso / Catalysis Today 107–108 (2005) 844–848846
Table 2
Mass loss in samples containing 2% Ti in an oxidant atmosphere
Sample Mass loss (%)
I (25–150 8C) II (150–350 8C) III (350–500 8C) IV (500–700 8C) Total (700–900 8C)
T02 6.8 6.2 2.0 0.6 15.5
Ac02 6.6 5.5 2.9 0.9 15.9
and Ac02). As the initial and final pH readings for both
reaction mixtures were similar throughout the synthesis,
while Ti content is much lower when H2TiF6 is used, it may
be possible that there is a greater difficulty to organize the
zeolite framework due to the stability of Ti and Al
complexes containing fluoride. In fact, the sample obtained
from F-containing mixture has also less Al when compared
to those achieved through TEOT.
From Table 1 it can be seen that the Ti source does not
have a significant influence on the Al/Ti ratio in a solid.
However, the Al/Ti ratio in the reaction mixture is 13.3,
which is a much lower value than that found in the solid. As
Al is known to be responsible for the nucleation of the
zeolite phase [3], this suggests that the incorporation of Al to
the structure is preferential to Ti. Except for sample
synthesized using TEOT, the Na/Al ratio is approximately
1.0, which suggests that all Al is present in the framework
and is neutralized by the Na.
Table 2 shows mass loss in samples synthesized with 2%
Ti, carried out by thermogravimetric analysis under an
oxidant atmosphere. All samples show mass losses in four
different temperature ranges [10].
From the results showed in Table 2, total mass loss is
approximately 15% for both samples. Mass loss in
temperature ranges I and II corresponds to water loss and
desorption of physically occluded template in the zeolite
channels. The mass loss in temperature ranges III and IV
may be related, respectively, to (a) the decomposition of the
protonated amine that is compensating for the negative
charge generated by the pentacoordinated Ti in the
framework [11] and (b) removal of the coke formed during
Fig. 2. UV–vis Spectra of samples containing 2% Ti synthesized with
H2TiF6 (sample Ac02) and TEOT (sample T02).
polymerisation of the olefins formed in previous temperature
range. Both losses are higher in sample synthesized using
H2TiF6. It is important to observe that despite the fact that
this sample shows to have lower Ti content (Table 1), the
thermal analysis shows a larger formation of pentacoordi-
nated Ti when compared to the T02 sample.
Fig. 2 shows UV–vis spectra of samples containing 2% Ti
(T02 and Ac02). This spectra display two absorption bands
that can be related to framework Ti. The absorption band at
approximately 210 nm (A) can be related to tetracoordinated
Ti isolated in the framework [12], while band (B) for the T02
sample (�260 nm) can be related to partially polymerised,
hexacoordinated species that make up Ti–O–Ti bonds
[11,12]. From Fig. 2, it can be seen that band (B) of the
sample synthesized with H2TiF6 (Ac02) is broader than for
T02. This could be due to the contribution from
pentacoordinated Ti species [11,13], as suggested by the
thermal analysis results, shown in Table 2. In the spectra
presented in Fig. 2, the band related to extra framework Ti
(320 nm) is not seen and confirms that extra framework Ti
was not formed in both samples.
3.2. Oxidation of cyclohexene
Fig. 3 shows the conversion of cyclohexene as a function
of the reaction time for protonic samples containing 0 and
2% Ti. It can be seen that the sample that does not contain Ti
has an almost negligible conversion, reaching 0.5% as its
highest value. It can also be seen that after 4 h of reaction,
samples containing Ti show a conversion close to 3%, which
Fig. 3. Conversion (�0.1%) of cyclohexene for samples containing 0 and
2% Ti.
R. Fernandez, D. Cardoso / Catalysis Today 107–108 (2005) 844–848 847
Fig. 4. Specific activity (�20) for samples containing 2% Ti.
Table 3
Selectivity of oxidation products after 4 h of reaction
Sample Selectivity Si (%)
a b c
M00H – 100 –
T02H 16.6 83.4 –
Ac02H 11.9 64.0 24.1
Si = 100 � mol of i formed/mol of cyclohexene consumed (a) cyclohexeneoxide, (b) 2-cyclohexene-1-ol, (c) cyclohexanol.
is a typical value for titanium-silicates under similar
conditions [7].
Fig. 3 shows the conversion of cyclohexene using
catalysts containing 2% Ti increases along the reaction time,
indicating that the system has not reached a balance.
Additionally, despite Ti contents being very different, the Ti-
containing catalysts shows to have a very similar behaviour,
regardless of the Ti source used.
Fig. 4 shows the specific activity, which is defined as the
ratio between the number of moles of cyclohexene converted
and the number of moles of Ti present in the catalyst, per h of
reaction time (Xc/Ti � h). As can be seen, the catalyst
synthesized with H2TiF6 displays a much higher specific
activity (up to 2.5 times) than that synthesized with TEOT.
These results confirm that despite the lower incorporation of
Ti to the Ac02 sample (see Table 1), Ti species are more
active than those in the sample synthesized with TEOT. As
the UV–vis and thermogravimetric results show that the
Ac02 sample contains larger quantity of pentacoordinated
Ti, this is the reason for increased catalytic activity.
In what concerns selectivity, these titanium-silicates can
form the following products during the oxidation of cyclo-
hexene, as shown in the following scheme: (a) cyclohexene
oxide, (b) 2-cyclohexene-1-ol and (c) cyclohexanol.
Table 3 shows the selectivity of the products formed
during oxidation of cyclohexene, after 4 h of reaction and
using samples containing 0 and 2% Ti. Because the presence
of some amount of Al is needed to get the MOR structure,
behaviour of the Ti-MOR catalyst is influenced by elements
such as the acidity and hydrophilic nature of the surface.
This can be confirmed by following the catalyst synthesized
without Ti (M00H), which, although not very active, results
exclusively from the formation of 2-cyclohexene-1-ol.
According to Balkus et al. [14], the acidic zeolite in the
presence of H2O2 is responsible for the development of this
type of product. Thus, for all the catalysts, 2-cyclohexene-1-
ol is formed as the main product, followed by cyclohexene
oxide (Table 3).
Selectivity of the catalysts prepared with 2% Ti indicates
that despitethe fact that the catalyst synthesized with H2TiF6showed to have more activity than that prepared with TEOT,
the latter is more selective with regards to the formation of
epoxide. Actually, sample Ac02H presents the formation of
cyclohexanol, which is simply the result from the hydrating
the olefin catalysed by acidic sites. These results suggest that
Ti species, which are present in the Ac02H sample, help
increase the acidity of the catalysts [15]. A higher acidity
could result from the fluoride in the Ti source.
4. Conclusions
Results from thiswork show that it is possible to synthesize
Ti-MOR through a cheaper and more stable Ti source
(H2TiF6). XRD patterns show that incorporating Ti to the
framework adversely affects the formation ofMOR structure.
The incorporation of Ti to the solid is larger in samples
synthesized with TEOT than with H2TiF6. Conversely, the
thermogravimetric analysis indicates a larger quantity of
pentacoordinated Ti species in the framework for the Ac02
sample. TheUV–vis spectra confirm the incorporation ofTi to
the MOR structure. Catalytic tests show that cyclohexene
conversion is similar for both the catalysts, regardless of theTi
source used in the preparation. The catalyst synthesized with
H2TiF6 showed to have higher specific activity in the
oxidation of cyclohexene than theTEOT-synthesized catalyst.
This shows that Ti species incorporated from a reaction
mixture containing fluoride are more active in this reaction.
The catalyst synthesized usingTEOThasgreater selectivity in
the formation of cyclohexene oxide.
R. Fernandez, D. Cardoso / Catalysis Today 107–108 (2005) 844–848848
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank CNPq and the Pronex
program for their financial support. We would also like to
thank Nalco for providing the colloidal silica used in this
study.
References
[1] M. Taramasso, G. Perego, B. Notari, US Patent 4,410,501 (1983).
[2] R.A. Sheldon, Heterogeneous catalytic oxidation and fine chemicals,
Stud. Surf. Catal. 59 (1991) 33.
[3] M.A. Camblor, A. Corma, J. Perez-Pariente, Zeolites 13 (1993) 82.
[4] G. Bellussi, A. Carati, M.G. Clerici, A. Esposito, R. Millini, F.
Buonomo, Belgian Patent 1,001,038 (1989).
[5] A. Corma, M.T. Navarro, J. Perez-Pariente, J. Chem. Soc., Chem.
Commun. 147 (1994) 147.
[6] A.J. Chandwadkar, A.A. Belhekar, T.K. Das, K. Chaudhari, S.G.
Hegde, Stud. Surf. Sci. Catal. 113 (1998) 195.
[7] R. Ryoo, J.H. Kwak, S.J. Cho, Catal. Lett. 37 (1996) 217.
[8] S.L. Jahn, D. Cardoso, 12th International Zeolite Conference, vol. III,
Material Research Society, Baltimore, USA, 1998, p. 1885.
[9] T. Yashima, P. Wu, T. Komatsu, J. Catal. 168 (1997) 400.
[10] J. Perez-Pariente, J.A. Martens, P.A. Jacobs, Appl. Catal. 31 (1987)
35.
[11] T. Blasco, M.A. Camblor, A. Corma, J. Perez-Pariente, J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 115 (1993) 11806.
[12] G. Petrini, A. Cesana, G. De Alberti, F. Genoni, G. Leofanti, M.
Padovan, G. Paparatto, P. Rofia, Stud. Surf. Sci. Catal. 68 (1991)
761.
[13] S.L. Jahn, P.A.P. Nascente, D. Cardoso, Zeolites 19 (1997)
416.
[14] K.J. Balkus, A.K. Khanmamedova, J. Shi, Stud. Surf. Sci. Catal. 110
(1997) 999.
[15] T. Blasco, M.A. Camblor, A. Corma, P. Esteve, J.M. Guil, A.
Martinez, J. Perdigon-Melon, S. Valencia, J. Phys. Chem. B 102
(1998) 75.