syntheses and studies of perfluoroalkyl substituted...

139
SYNTHESES AND STUDIES OF PERFLUOROALKYL SUBSTITUTED COMPOUNDS By CHAYA POOPUT A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2005

Upload: others

Post on 20-Oct-2020

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • SYNTHESES AND STUDIES OF PERFLUOROALKYL SUBSTITUTED

    COMPOUNDS

    By

    CHAYA POOPUT

    A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT

    OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY

    UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA

    2005

  • This dissertation is dedicated to my parents, Chatchawan and Payom Pooput.

  • iii

    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

    I express my deep gratitude to my advisor (Dr. William R. Dolbier, Jr.).

    Throughout the years I have spent in his laboratory, I was able to acquire invaluable

    knowledge to help me achieve my goals. Without his ideas, guidance and support, I

    would not have been able to complete my research. I thank Dr. Samia Aït-Mohand for

    helping me get started in research in my first year. I thank Dr Dolbier’s group members

    for their help. I thank David Duncan for helping me in experiments on TDAE analogue

    project. I thank the Chemistry Department of the University of Florida for accepting me

    in the graduate program. I thank all my friends, especially Valerie, Igor, Rachel, Rafal,

    Janet, Jim, Gary, Rong and Hongfang for their support and friendship. I would like to

    thank again Valerie for always being here for me, for cheering me up when I was down

    and for sharing with me most of the wonderful moments I have in Gainesville. I also

    thank Valerie’s parents (Vale and Iris) for welcoming me in their home in Puerto Rico

    and for giving me warmth and love that make me feel like I was a part of their family. I

    thank Valerie’s big family in Puerto Rico, Sonia, Mia, Nilda, Nelson and Nydia for their

    love. I also thank my aunt Wanee for her support and love when I was in France. I thank

    my sister for being who she is and for her love. Finally I am eternally grateful to my

    parents. Because of their sacrifices, I was able to achieve this high level of education.

    Their constant support and love gave me strength.

  • iv

    TABLE OF CONTENTS page

    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ................................................................................................. iii

    LIST OF TABLES........................................................................................................... viii

    LIST OF FIGURES .............................................................................................................x

    LIST OF SCHEMES........................................................................................................ xiii

    ABSTRACT..................................................................................................................... xvi

    CHAPTER

    1 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................1

    1.1 General Information.....................................................................................1 1.2 Previous Work .............................................................................................3

    1.2.1 Starting Point ...................................................................................3 1.2.2 Preliminary Results in the Group.....................................................4 1.2.3 New and Efficient Method for Synthesis of Trifluoromethyl

    Sulfides ............................................................................................5 1.2.4 New and Efficient Method for Synthesis of Trifluoromethyl

    Selenides ........................................................................................10

    2 SYNTHESIS OF PERFLUOROALKYL THIO AND SELENOETHERS ..........12

    2.1 Introduction................................................................................................12 2.2 Synthesis of Pentafluoroethyl Thioethers ..................................................14 2.3 Synthesis of Pentafluoroethyl Selenoethers...............................................16 2.4 Synthesis of Perfluorobutyl Thioethers .....................................................17 2.5 Synthesis of Perfluorobutyl Selenoethers ..................................................19 2.6 Conclusion .................................................................................................19 2.7 Experimental ..............................................................................................20

    2.7.1 General Synthesis of Pentafluoroethyl Thio and Selenoethers : Synthesis of Phenyl Pentafluoroethyl Sulfide................................20

    2.7.2 General Synthesis of Nonafluorobutyl Thio and Selenoethers : Synthesis of Phenyl Nonafluorobutyl Sulfide................................22

  • v

    3 PERFLUOROALKYLATION OF IMINE TOSYLATES....................................25

    3.1 Introduction................................................................................................25 3.2 Synthesis of Tosyl Imines..........................................................................28 3.3 Pentafluoroethylation of Tosyl Imines.......................................................29 3.4 Perfluorobutylation of Tosyl Imines..........................................................31 3.5 Conclusion .................................................................................................33 3.6 Experimental ..............................................................................................33

    3.6.1 Syntheses of Tosyl Imines .............................................................33 3.6.2 General Procedure for Pentafluoroethylation of Tosyl Imines :

    Synthesis of Methyl-N-(3,3,3,2,2-pentafluoro-1-phenyl-propyl)-benzenesulfonamide (3.1a) ............................................................36

    3.6.3 General Procedure for Perfluorobutylation of Tosyl Imines: Synthesis of 4-Methyl-N-[5,5,5,4,4,3,3,2,2-nonafluoro-(4-methyl-phenyl)-propyl]-benzenesulfonamide (3.2b).....................40

    4 PERFLUOROAKYLATION OF ALDEHYDES AND KETONES.....................44

    4.1 Introduction................................................................................................44 4.2 Pentafluoroethylation of Aldehydes and Ketones......................................45 4.3 Perfluorobutylation of Aldehydes and Ketones.........................................47 4.4 Conclusion .................................................................................................48 4.5 Experimental ..............................................................................................48

    4.5.1 General Procedure of Pentafluoroethylation of Aldehydes and Ketones: Synthesis of 1-Phenyl-2,2,3,3,3-pentafluoropropan-1-ol (4.2)............................................................................................48

    4.5.2 General Procedure for Perfluorobutylation of Aldehydes and Ketones: Synthesis of 1-Phenyl-2,2,3,3,4,4,5,5,5-nonafluoropentan-1-ol....................................................................50

    5 SYNTHESES AND STUDIES OF TETRAKIS(DIMETHYLAMINO)ETHYLENE ANALOGUES.........................52

    5.1 Introduction................................................................................................52 5.2 Syntheses of TDAE Analogues .................................................................54

    5.2.1 Synthesis of 1,3,1’,3’-Tetraalkyl-2,2’-bis(imidazolidene) ............54 5.2.2 Synthesis of 1,3,1',3'-Tetramethyl-2,2'-bis(benzimidazolylidene).54

    5.3 Attempts of Trifluoromethylation using the TDAE Analogues ................56 5.3.1 Attempts of Trifluoromethylation using 1,3,1’,3’-Tetraalkyl-

    2,2’-bis(imidazolidene) instead of TDAE......................................56 5.3.2 Nucleophilic Trifluoromethylation of Phenyl disulfide using

    1,3,1',3'-Tetramethyl-2,2'-bis(benzimidazolylidene) .....................59 5.4 Conclusion .................................................................................................60 5.5 Experimental ..............................................................................................60

    5.5.1 Synthesis of 1,3,1’,3’-Tetraethyl-2,2’-bis(imidazolidene) (5.1) ....60

  • vi

    5.5.4 Synthesis of 1,3,1',3'-Tetramethyl-2,2'-bis(benzimidazolylidene) (5.4)................................................................................................61

    6 DIMERIC DERIVATIVES OF OCTAFLUORO[2,2]PARACYCLOPHANE (AF4) : A NEW SOURCE OF PERFLUOROALKYL RADICALS....................63

    6.1 Introduction................................................................................................63 6.1.1 General Information.......................................................................63 6.1.2 Synthesis of AF4............................................................................64

    6.2 Kinetic Studies of CF3-AF4-dimers...........................................................66 6.2.1 Synthesis of CF3-AF4-dimer..........................................................66 6.2.2 Thermal Decomposition of the CF3-AF4-dimer ...........................68 6.2.3 Kinetic Study of Homolysis of CF3-AF4-Dimers..........................70

    6.3 Kinetic Studies of C2F5-AF4-dimers .........................................................74 6.3.1 Synthesis of C2F5-AF4-dimers.......................................................74 6.3.2 Kinetic Studies of the Homolysis of C2F5-AF4-dimers.................76

    6.4 Conclusion .................................................................................................80 6.5 Experimental ..............................................................................................80

    6.5.1 Synthesis of CF3-AF4-Dimer.........................................................80 6.5.2 Kinetic Studies of CF3-AF4-Dimer ...............................................81

    6.5.2.1 General procedure...........................................................81 6.5.2.2 Kinetic data and graphs for CF3-AF4-Dimer

    at 140.1 ºC.......................................................................82 6.5.2.3 Kinetic data and graphs for CF3-AF4-Dimer at

    151.0 ºC...........................................................................84 6.5.2.4 Kinetic data and graphs for CF3-AF4-Dimer at

    160.7 ºC...........................................................................86 6.5.2.5 Kinetic data and graphs for CF3-AF4-Dimer at

    170.3 ºC...........................................................................88 6.5.2.6 Kinetic data and graphs for CF3-AF4-Dimer at

    179.7 ºC...........................................................................90 6.5.3 Synthesis of C2F5-AF4-Dimer .......................................................92 6.5.4 X-ray Structure of C2F5-AF4-Dimers ............................................93 6.5.5 Kinetic Studies of C2F5-AF4-Dimers.............................................96

    6.5.5.1 General procedure...........................................................96 6.5.5.2 Kinetic data and graphs of C2F5-AF4-Dimers at

    118.8 ºC...........................................................................97 6.5.5.3 Kinetic data and graphs of C2F5-AF4-Dimers at

    125.7 ºC...........................................................................99 6.5.5.4 Kinetic data and graphs of C2F5-AF4-Dimers at

    130.5 ºC.........................................................................101 6.5.5.5 Kinetic data and graphs of C2F5-AF4-Dimers at

    139.6 ºC.........................................................................103 6.5.5.6 Kinetic data and graphs of C2F5-AF4-Dimers at

    145.3 ºC.........................................................................105 6.5.5.7 Kinetic data and graphs of C2F5-AF4-Dimers at

    151.3 ºC.........................................................................107

  • vii

    6.5.5.8 Kinetic data and graphs of C2F5-AF4-Dimers at 156.4 ºC.........................................................................109

    6.5.5.9 Kinetic data and graphs of C2F5-AF4-Dimers at 161.0 ºC.........................................................................111

    6.5.5.10 Kinetic data and graphs of C2F5-AF4-Dimers at 165.9 ºC.........................................................................113

    GENERAL CONCLUSION ............................................................................................115

    LIST OF REFERENCES.................................................................................................116

    BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH ...........................................................................................122

  • viii

    LIST OF TABLES

    Table page 1-1 Trifluoromethylation of disulfides .............................................................................7

    1-2 Trifluoromethylation of disulfides using a higher amount of CF3I............................8

    1-3 Synthesis of trifluoromethyl selenoethers ................................................................11

    2-1 Synthesis of pentafluoroethyl thioethers ..................................................................15

    2-2 Synthesis of pentafluoroethyl selenoethers ..............................................................16

    2-3 Synthesis of perfluorobutyl thioethers .....................................................................17

    2-4 Synthesis of perfluorobutyl selenides ......................................................................19

    3-1 Synthesis of tosyl imines..........................................................................................28

    3-2 Nucleophilic pentafluoroethylation of tosyl imines .................................................30

    3-3 Nucleophilic perfluorobutylation of tosyl imines ....................................................32

    4-1 Compared yields between pentafluoroethylation and trifluoromethylation of aldehydes and ketones ..............................................................................................46

    4-2 Perfluorobutylation of aldehydes and ketones .........................................................47

    6-1 Rate constants of the 2 diasteromers of CF3-AF4-dimers........................................71

    6-2 Half-life times of the homolysis of CF3-AF4-dimers..............................................72

    6-3 Arrhenius plot data ...................................................................................................74

    6-4 Activation parameters for CF3-AF4-dimers .............................................................74

    6-5 Rate constants of the 2 diasteromers of C2F5-AF4-dimers ......................................77

    6-6 Half-life times of the homolysis of C2F5-AF4-dimers .............................................77

    6-7 Arrhenius plot data for C2F5-AF4-dimers ................................................................78

  • ix

    6.8 Activation parameters for C2F5-AF4-dimers............................................................78

    6-9 Kinetic data of d,l-CF3-AF4-Dimer at 140.1 ºC.......................................................82

    6-10 Kinetic data of meso-CF3-AF4-Dimer at 140.1 ºC ..................................................82

    6-11 Kinetic data of CF3-AF4-Dimers at 151.0 ºC...........................................................84

    6-12 Kinetic data of CF3-AF4-Dimers at 160.7 ºC...........................................................86

    6-13 Kinetic data of CF3-AF4-Dimers at 170.3 ºC...........................................................88

    6-14 Kinetic data of CF3-AF4-Dimers at 179.7 ºC...........................................................90

    6-15 Crystal data and structure refinement.......................................................................95

    6-16 Selected bond lengths [Å] and angles [°] .................................................................96

    6-17 Kinetic data of C2F5-AF4-Dimers at 118.8 ºC .........................................................97

    6-18 Kinetic data of C2F5-AF4-Dimers at 125.7 ºC .........................................................99

    6-19 Kinetic graph of C2F5-AF4-Dimers at 130.5 ºC.....................................................101

    6-20 Kinetic data of C2F5-AF4-Dimers at 139.6 ºC .......................................................103

    6-21 Kinetic data of C2F5-AF4-Dimers at 145.3 ºC .......................................................105

    6-22 Kinetic data of C2F5-AF4-Dimers at 151.3 ºC .......................................................107

    6-23 Kinetic data of C2F5-AF4-Dimers at 156.4 ºC .......................................................109

    6-24 Kinetic data of C2F5-AF4-Dimers at 161.0 ºC .......................................................111

    6-25 Kinetic data of C2F5-AF4-Dimers at 165.9 ºC .......................................................113

  • x

    LIST OF FIGURES

    Figure page 1-1 Prozac®......................................................................................................................1

    1-2 Celebrex® ..................................................................................................................1

    1-3 Fipronil®....................................................................................................................1

    2-1 2A28: insecticide .......................................................................................................12

    2-2 2B29: insecticide .......................................................................................................12

    2-3 2C30: pesticide ..........................................................................................................12

    3-1 3A .............................................................................................................................25

    3-2 3B .............................................................................................................................25

    3-3 3C .............................................................................................................................27

    3-4 3D .............................................................................................................................27

    3-5 A resonance form of N-(N-methyl-3-indolylmethylene)-p-methylbenzenesulfonamide......................................................................................31

    4-1 4A56 : Fungicide .......................................................................................................44

    4-2 4B57 : insecticide ......................................................................................................44

    5-1. Structure of a chiral TDAE analogue .........................................................................53

    5-2 Non chiral TDAE analogue......................................................................................53

    5-3 benzimidazole TDAE analogue ...............................................................................54

    5-4 Cyclic voltammogram for 1,3,1’,3’-Tetraethyl-2,2’-bis(imidazolidene), C = 3mM in DMF + 0.1 mM Et4NBF4 at 20 °C, scan rate: 0.2V/s.................................59

    6-1 [2,2]-paracyclophane................................................................................................64

  • xi

    6-2 AF4...........................................................................................................................64

    6-3 Trifluoromethyl-AF4 derivative...............................................................................65

    6-4 19F NMR distinction examining the d,l and the meso forms of CF3-AF4-dimers ...67

    6-5 Arrhenius plot for the 2 diasteromers of CF3-AF4-dimers ......................................73

    6-6 19F NMR distinction examining the d,l and the meso forms of C2F5-AF4-dimers ..75

    6-7 Perspective view (ORTEP) of meso-C2F5-AF4-dimer.............................................76

    6-8 Arrhenius plot for the 2 diasteromers of C2F5-AF4-dimers .....................................79

    6-9 Kinetic Graph of d,l-CF3-AF4-Dimer at 140.1 ºC ...................................................83

    6-10 Kinetic Graph of meso-CF3-AF4-Dimer at 140.1 ºC ...............................................83

    6-11 Kinetic Graph of d,l-CF3-AF4-Dimer at 151.0 ºC ...................................................85

    6-12 Kinetic Graph of meso-CF3-AF4-Dimer at 151.0 ºC ...............................................85

    6-13 Kinetic Graph of d,l-CF3-AF4-Dimer at 160.7 ºC ...................................................87

    6-14 Kinetic Graph of meso-CF3-AF4-Dimer at 160.7 ºC ...............................................87

    6-15 Kinetic graph of d,l-CF3-AF4-Dimers at 170.3 ºC...................................................89

    6-16 Kinetic graph of meso-CF3-AF4-Dimers at 170.3 ºC ..............................................89

    6-17 Kinetic graph of d,l-CF3-AF4-Dimers at 179.7 ºC...................................................91

    6-18 Kinetic graph of meso-CF3-AF4-Dimers at 179.7 ºC ..............................................91

    6-19 X-ray structure of meso-C2F5-AF4-dimer................................................................94

    6-20 Kinetic graph of d,l-C2F5-AF4-Dimers at 118.8 ºC .................................................98

    6-21 Kinetic graph of meso-C2F5-AF4-Dimers at 118.8 ºC .............................................98

    6-22 Kinetic graph of d,l-C2F5-AF4-Dimers at 125.7 ºC ...............................................100

    6-23 Kinetic graph of meso-C2F5-AF4-Dimers at 125.7 ºC ...........................................100

    6-24 Kinetic graph of d,l-C2F5-AF4-Dimers at 130.5 ºC ...............................................102

    6-25 Kinetic graph of meso-C2F5-AF4-Dimers at 130.5 ºC ...........................................102

    6-26 Kinetic graph of d,l-C2F5-AF4-Dimers at 139.6 ºC ...............................................104

  • xii

    6-27 Kinetic graph of meso-C2F5-AF4-Dimers at 139.6 ºC ...........................................104

    6-28 Kinetic graph of d,l-C2F5-AF4-Dimers at 145.3 ºC ...............................................106

    6-29 Kinetic data of meso-C2F5-AF4-Dimers at 145.3 ºC .............................................106

    6-30 Kinetic data of d,l-C2F5-AF4-Dimers at 151.3 ºC..................................................108

    6-31 Kinetic data of meso-C2F5-AF4-Dimers at 151.3 ºC .............................................108

    6-32 Kinetic graph of d,l-C2F5-AF4-Dimers at 156.4 ºC ...............................................110

    6-33 Kinetic graph of meso-C2F5-AF4-Dimers at 156.4 ºC ...........................................110

    6-34 Kinetic graph of d,l-C2F5-AF4-Dimers at 161.0 ºC ...............................................112

    6-35 Kinetic graph of meso-C2F5-AF4-Dimers at 161.0 ºC ...........................................112

    6-36 Kinetic graph of d,l-C2F5-AF4-Dimers at 165.9 ºC ...............................................114

    6-37 Kinetic graph of meso-C2F5-AF4-Dimers at 165.9 ºC ...........................................114

  • xiii

    LIST OF SCHEMES

    Scheme page 1-1 Trifluoromethylation of benzaldehyde using fluoroform...........................................2

    1-2 Trifluoromethylation of benzaldehyde using trifluoromethyl zinc iodide .................2

    1-3 Examples of trifluoromethylation reactions using Me3SiCF3 ....................................3

    1-4 Difluoromethylation reactions of aromatic aldehydes with TDAE ...........................3

    1-5 Difluoromethylation reactions of ethyl pyruvates with TDAE..................................4

    1-6 Trifluoromethylation reaction of aldehydes and ketones ...........................................4

    1-7 Trifluoromethylation reaction of acyl chlorides.........................................................4

    1-8 Trifluoromethylation reaction of vicinal diol cyclic sulfate.......................................5

    1-9 Synthesis of trifluoromethyl phenyl sulfide via SRN1 type reaction ..........................5

    1-10 Synthesis of trifluoromethyl phenyl sulfide using various sources of CF3¯ ..............6

    1-11 Synthesis of trifluoromethyl thioethers ......................................................................6

    1-12 Efficient synthesis of trifluoromethyl sulfides ...........................................................7

    1-13 Mechanism of trifluoromethylation of disulfides.......................................................7

    1-14 Another possible mechanism of formation of trifluoromethyl sulfide.....................10

    1-15 Synthesis of trifluoromethyl selenoethers ................................................................10

    2-1 Different methods for synthesis of perfluoroalkyl sulfides and selenides ...............13

    2-2 Synthesis of trifluoromethyl sulfides with CF3I / TDAE methodology...................13

    2-3 Tandem CF3I process in the synthesis of trifluoromethyl sulfides ..........................14

    2-4 Pentafluoroethylation of disulfides ..........................................................................15

    2-5 Pentafluoroethylation of diselenides ........................................................................16

  • xiv

    2-6 Synthesis of perfluorobutyl thioethers .....................................................................17

    2-7 Synthesis of perfluorobutyl selenides ......................................................................19

    3-1 Trifluoromethylation of imines using Ruppert’s reagent .........................................26

    3-2 Trifluoromethylation of imines using CF3I / TDAE ...............................................27

    3-1 Synthesis of tosyl imines..........................................................................................28

    3-2 Nucleophilic pentafluoroethylation of tosyl imines .................................................29

    3-3 Nucleophilic perfluorobutylation of tosyl imines ....................................................31

    4-1 Pentafluoroethylation of aldehydes and ketones ......................................................45

    4-2 Nucleophilic perfluorobutylation of aldehydes and ketones....................................47

    5-1 CF3I / TDAE complex..............................................................................................52

    5-2 Synthesis 1,3,1’,3’-tetraalkyl-2,2’-bis(imidazolidene) ............................................54

    5-3 Multi-step synthesis of benzimidazol TDAE analogue............................................55

    5-4 Nucleophilic trifluoromethylation of benzaldehyde using 1,3,1’,3’-tetraalkyl-2,2’-bis(imidazolidene) ............................................................................................56

    5-5 Synthesis of phenyl trifluoromethyl sulfide by using imidazolidene TDAE analogue ...................................................................................................................57

    5-6 Possible decomposition pathways for imidazolidene TDAE analogue....................57

    5-7 Reactivities of imidazolidene carbene towards benzaldehyde................................58

    5-8 Attempt of synthesis of phenyl trifluoromethyl sulfide by using 1,3,1',3'-Tetramethyl-2,2'-bis(benzimidazolylidene) .............................................................59

    6-1 Synthesis of AF4 ......................................................................................................64

    6-2 Mechanism of formation of AF4..............................................................................65

    6-3 Synthesis of CF3-AF4-dimer ....................................................................................66

    6-4 Formation of CF3-AF4-dimer...................................................................................66

    6-6 Two possible pathways for decomposition of CF3-AF4-dimer ...............................68

    6-7 Resulting products from radical trapping in different possible mechanism pathway ....................................................................................................................69

  • xv

    6-8 Kinetic study of homolysis of CF3-AF4-Dimers.....................................................70

    6-9 Synthesis of C2F5-AF4-dimers .................................................................................75

  • xvi

    Abstract of Dissertation Presented to the Graduate School of the University of Florida in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy

    SYNTHESES AND STUDIES OF PERFLUOROALKYL SUBSTITUTED COMPOUNDS

    By

    Chaya Pooput

    August 2005

    Chair: William R. Dolbier, Jr. Major Department: Chemistry

    Numerous compounds containing perfluoroalkyl groups are found to be

    biologically active and are largely used in pharmaceutical and agrochemical areas.

    Although several methods have been developed to incorporate trifluoromethyl group into

    molecules, few are for longer perfluoroalkyl chains.

    Nucleophilic trifluoromethylation has been largely developed in our laboratory by

    using CF3I and Tetrakis(dimethylamino)ethylene (TDAE). This methodology was

    extended to longer perfluoroalkyl iodides. Pentafluoroethyl iodide and nonafluorobutyl

    iodide were used instead of trifluoromethyl iodide.

    Reactions with disulfides and diselenides provided efficiently perfluoroalkyl thio-

    and selenoethers, where, in most cases, both halves of the disulfides or diselenides were

    converted quantitatively to thio or selenoethers.

    Numerous pentafluoroethyl and nonafluorobutyl substituted amines could be

    obtained in high yields by extending the methodology with tosyl imines.

  • xvii

    Reactions with aldehydes and ketones provided good yields of pentafluoroethyl

    substituted alcohols. But reactions using nonafluorobutyl iodide afforded low yields.

    The extension of CF3I / TDAE methodology to longer perfluoroalkyl iodides will

    allow us to access to a much larger number of biologically active compounds.

    Several TDAE analogues were also synthesized but their reactivity towards CF3I is

    completely different from TDAE and couldn’t be used as TDAE substituents.

    The syntheses and kinetic studies of perfluoroalkyl substituted AF4 dimers

    provided valuable information on the use of these compounds as a stable source of

    perfluoroalkyl radicals.

  • 1

    CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION

    1.1 General Information

    Pharmaceutical and agrochemical industries have a growing interest in compounds

    containing perfluoroalkyl groups. Many new drugs contain trifluoromethyl groups:

    examples are shown in Figures 1-1 and 1-2:

    O

    F3C

    NHCH3

    NSN CF3O

    O

    H2N

    Figure1-1. Prozac® Figure1-2. Celebrex®

    NN

    CF3

    SNC

    ClCl

    NH2

    O

    CF3

    Figure1-3. Fipronil®

    Among the several methods of incorporating the trifluoromethyl group into a

    compound, one of the most useful is to generate in situ the unstable trifluoromethyl anion

    to undergo nucleophilic trifluoromethylation on electrophilic substrates.

  • 2

    Various methods have been used to generate the trifluoromethyl anion: i) The

    groups of Roques1 and Normant2 effectively performed nucleophilic trifluoromethylation

    by using fluoroform (CF3H) in the presence of base; and ii) Kitazume3 used

    trifluoromethylzinc iodide, prepared from trifluoromethyl iodide and zinc powder with

    ultrasonic irradiation, as a trifluoromethylation reagent (Scheme 1-2).

    H

    O

    CF3H +1) DMF, -50 oC

    2) tBuOK, 1h3) AcOH, 0 oC - 20 oC

    H

    OHCF3

    Yield = 67%

    Scheme 1-1. Trifluoromethylation of benzaldehyde using fluoroform

    Curently the most commonly used source of the nucleophilic trifluoromethyl anion

    is (trifluoromethyl)trimethylsilane (TMSCF3). In the past few years the groups of Prakash

    and Shreeve have developed the method of generating in situ CF3¯ by reaction of

    (trifluoromethyl)trimethylsilane (CF3TMS) with TBAF,4 CsF.5 Fuchikami6 reported that

    trifluoromethylation reactions of carbonyl compounds can also be catalyzed by Lewis

    bases, such as triethylamine, pyridine or triphenyl phosphine.

    H

    O

    ultrasound

    H

    OHCF3

    Yield = 72%

    CF3I Zn+ + DMF

    Scheme 1-2. Trifluoromethylation of benzaldehyde using trifluoromethyl zinc iodide

    Extensive research had been performed on the use of this reagent with different

    substrates, such as ketones, esters and disulfides.

  • 3

    R1 R2

    O

    Me3SiCF3 R1 R2

    OH

    CF3CsF

    H3O+

    +

    R1 OMe

    O

    Me3SiCF3Bu4N

    + F-

    H3O+

    +R1 CF3

    O

    R-S-S-R Me3SiCF3 THF

    0 oC+ + R-S-CF3Bu4N

    + F-

    Scheme 1-3. Examples of trifluoromethylation reactions using Me3SiCF35, 7, 8

    Even though (trifluoromethyl)trimethylsilane is a powerful trifluoromethylation

    agent, it is very expensive. Our group wanted to find a less expensive and more direct

    way to generate the nucleophilic CF3¯ anion.

    1.2 Previous Work

    1.2.1 Starting Point

    Since 1998, with the collaboration of Dr. Maurice Médebielle, we have

    demonstrated that tetrakis(dimethylamino)ethylene (TDAE) can be used as an efficient

    reductant to generate nucleophilic difluoromethyl anions from chloro- and

    bromodifluoromethyl compounds.9, 10

    RCF2X ArCHODMF

    OH

    Ar

    CF2R

    H

    -20 0 to RT

    TDAE

    Scheme 1-4. Difluoromethylation reactions of aromatic aldehydes with TDAE

    RCF2X CH3COCO2EtDMF

    OH

    H3C

    CF2R

    CO2Et

    -20 0 to RT

    TDAE

  • 4

    Scheme 1-5. Difluoromethylation reactions of ethyl pyruvates with TDAE

    Pawelke earlier demonstrated that TDAE could be used with trifluoromethyl iodide

    to prepare CF3TMS from TMSCl.11 With these results, we decided to use TDAE to

    reduce trifluoromethyl iodide into trifluoromethyl anion.

    1.2.2 Preliminary Results in the Group

    With the aldehydes and ketones, the CF3I / TDAE system provided very good

    yields, which were comparable to those obtained in analogous reactions using CF3TMS.12

    R1 R2

    OCF3I

    DMF

    OHR1

    CF3

    R2TDAE-20 0 to RT

    hν, 12 hrs

    1 eq 2.2 eq 2.2 eq

    Scheme 1-6. Trifluoromethylation reaction of aldehydes and ketones

    Aryl acyl chlorides also underwent clean recations.13

    Cl

    O

    X

    O

    OF3C CF3

    X X

    CF3I / TDAE DME-20O C to RTRT, 2 hrs

    Scheme 1-7. Trifluoromethylation reaction of acyl chlorides

    Unfortunately the CF3I / TDAE system was not successful in reactions with

    epoxides. But in 1988 Gao and Sharpless demonstrated that vicinal diol cyclic sulfates

    could be used as epoxide equivalents, with a higher reactivity.14

    OS

    O

    O O

    CF3ITHF

    CF3HO

    IHO

    OHF3CTDAE

    -20o C to RT

    20% H2SO4

    55% < 1%

    40%

    5 hrs

    +

    1 eq 2.2 eq 2.2 eq

    53-95 %

    48-98 %

  • 5

    Scheme 1-8. Trifluoromethylation reaction of vicinal diol cyclic sulfate

    The reaction is highly regioselective because only 1% of the other isomer is

    formed. Since the cyclic sulfate is highly reactive, competition between the iodide anion

    and the trifluoromethyl anion occurred, which did not happen with other substrates.15

    1.2.3 New and Efficient Method for Synthesis of Trifluoromethyl Sulfides

    Aryl trifluoromethyl sulfides continue to attract much interest within

    pharmaceutical companies, as witnessed by the significant number of process patent

    applications recently submitted that are devoted to their preparation17. This interest

    derives from the recognized potential of the SCF3 group to have a positive influence on

    biological activity.

    Diverse methods have been reported for the synthesis of aryl trifluoromethyl

    sulfides18, but two seem to emerge as preferred methods.

    The first is the SRN1 reaction of aryl thiolates with trifluoromethyl iodide or

    bromide. Yagulpolskii was the first to report the reaction in 1977, using trifluoromethyl

    iodide and UV irradiation19:

    Ph-SH CF3ICH3CN, 0 - 5

    oC+ Ph-S-CF3NaOCH3 , UV 89%

    Scheme 1-9. Synthesis of trifluoromethyl phenyl sulfide via SRN1 type reaction

    Wakselman and Tordeux used trifluoromethyl bromide in high pressure

    (2 atm),20, 21 and with other variations,22, 23 this method is generally efficient when using

    aryl thiolates but gives a much lower yield when using alkanethiolates.24

    The other popular method involves the reaction of trifluoromethyl anion (generated

    in situ by various methods) with aryl and alkyl disulfides:

  • 6

    PhS-SPh CF3SiMe3THF, 0 oC

    + Ph-S-CF3

    32% 8

    Ph-S -+Bu4N

    + F-

    PhS-SPh CF3CO2K+ Ph-S-CF3sulfolane, ∆

    56% 25

    84% 26

    Ph-S -+

    PhS-SPh + Ph-S-CF3

    87% 27

    Ph-S -+tBuOK

    N N

    OH

    F3C

    H

    Ph

    Scheme 1-10. Synthesis of trifluoromethyl phenyl sulfide using various sources of CF3¯

    Although good yields can be obtained, the method suffers from the fact that half of

    the disulfide is wasted in the process (formation of thiolates for the other half).

    In our investigation16, the CF3I / TDAE system turned out to be a better method for

    synthesis of trifluoromethyl sulfides than with Ruppert reagents (Table 1-1). Both aryl

    and aliphatic disulfides provided near 100 % yield. The reaction is very fast - only 2

    hours of stirring at room temperature was sufficient to give a quantitative yield, as shown

    in the entries 4 and 5.

    R-S-S-R TDAE CF3I DMF0 oC to RT

    R-S-CF3+ +

    RT several hr1 eq. 2.2 eq 2.2 eq

    Scheme 1-11. Synthesis of trifluoromethyl thioethers

  • 7

    Table 1-1. Trifluoromethylation of disulfides

    entry R Stirring time at RT (hrs) NMR yield

    1 Phenyl 12 80

    2 butyl 12 >98

    3 ethyl 12 >98

    4 butyl 4 >98

    5 butyl 2 >98

    R-S-S-R TDAE CF3I DMF0 oC to RT

    R-S-CF3+ +

    RT several hr1 eq. 2.2 eq 4.2 eq

    180 - 200%based of equivalentsof disulfides

    Scheme 1-12. Efficient synthesis of trifluoromethyl sulfides

    It has been demonstrated that the mechanism of the reaction is as shown in the

    Scheme 1-13.

    TDAE CF3I

    CF3R-S-S-R

    R-S CF3I

    CF3

    R-S-CF3

    R-S-CF3

    I

    I

    R-S

    + TDAE 2+ +

    + +

    + +

    Scheme 1-13. Mechanism of trifluoromethylation of disulfides

    It occurred to us that CF3I could also be used as a substrate for reaction, via the

    SRN1 mechanism, with the thiolate coproduct; thus, potentially enabling both halves of the

    disulfide to be used in a one pot reaction, where CF3I would be used in two different

    reactions, both of which lead to the same desired product. First TDAE reduces CF3I to

    nucleophilic “CF3¯”, which reacts with the disulfide to form trifluoromethyl sulfide and

  • 8

    thiolate. The resulting thiolate reacts with the excess of CF3I, in a SRN1 type mechanism

    to create the second molecule of sulfide.

    When more than 4.2 equivalents of CF3I are used while the quantity of TDAE stays

    at 2.2 equivalents, trifluoromethyl sulfides can be obtained at nearly 200% yield, based

    on the number of equivalents of disulfides, as shown in the Table 1-2.

    Table 1-2. Trifluoromethylation of disulfides using a higher amount of CF3I

    entry R Equiv. of CF3IStirring time at RT

    (hrs) NMR yield*

    1 Phenyl 5 12 186

    2 butyl 5 12 170

    3 4-pyridyl 5 12 ≈ 200

    4 butyl 5 4 170

    5 butyl 4.2 4 175

    6 butyl 3.2 4 130

    7 butyl 4.2 2 170

    8 ethyl 4.2 2 180

    9 2-pyridyl 4.2 2 180

    10 t-butyl 4.2 12 0

    11 2-nitrophenyl 4.2 2 185

    12 benzothiazolyl 4.2 2 190

    13 4-aminophenyl 4.2 12 20

    S

    N

    benzothiazolyl group

    *based of number of equivalents of disulfides

    The entries 1 to 3 show that with 5 equivalents of CF3I, yields of nearly 200%

    could be obtained whether with aryl disulfide or alkyl disulfide. The following entries are

    attempts to optimize the procedure: 3.2 equivalents of CF3I did not seem to be sufficient,

  • 9

    since the yield was only 130% (entry 6) whereas more than 4.2 equivalents gave nearly

    quantitative yields. Moreover 2 hours of stirring at room temperature was sufficient.

    Although with t-butyl disulfide, we were unable to perform the trifluoromethylation

    (entry 10), the result is nevertheless interesting because this shows a high influence of the

    steric effect for the reaction. Moreover the lack of reactivity of t-butyl disulfide has been

    noted previously, when CF3TMS was used as trifluoromethyl anion source.8 The entry 13

    revealed another limitation of this methodology: CF3¯ anion being extremely unstable

    reacts preferable first towards acidic protons, such as the ones present in the amino group

    hence the very low yield for the reaction with 4-aminophenyl disulfide (Table 1-2, entry

    13). All the groups containing acidic protons need then to be protected first before

    undergoing trifluoromethylation with CF3I / TDAE method. In the case of 4-aminophenyl

    disulfide, 4-nitrophenyl disulfide can be used and the nitro group can be reduced later to

    obtain the amino group; the amino group can also be protected twice with BOC to avoid

    the harsh conditions of reduction of nitro group.

    It might be argued that these results could derive from reduction by TDAE of

    disulfide to 2 equivalents of thiolate anion. The thiolate could react then with CF3I

    proceeding entirely via SRN1 type reaction. If that were the case, the 2.2 equivalents of

    CF3I along with 2.2 equivalents of TDAE should have been sufficient to obtain the high

    yields observed in the Table 1-2. However, in the case where 2.2 equivalents of CF3I

    were used (Table 1-1), yields never exceeded 100%. This probably means that CF3I is

    reduced faster than the disulfides.

  • 10

    TDAE R-S-S-R

    2 R-S 2 CF3I

    2 R-S

    2 R-S-CF3 2 I

    + TDAE 2+

    + +

    Scheme 1-14. Another possible mechanism of formation of trifluoromethyl sulfide

    Nevertheless, a control reaction was carried out to provide more definitive evidence

    for the proposed dual mechanism synthetic process. CF3I (5 equiv.) and TDAE (2 equiv.)

    were added first together at –20°C so that TDAE would be totally oxidized by the

    reaction with CF3I. The solution was then allowed to warm to -5°C, at which time, n-

    butyl disulfide was introduced. At this point there should be little if any TDAE remaining

    to react with the disulfide. Despite this, the observed yield from this reaction was 160%,

    which compares well with the 170% obtained when using the normal procedure (Table 1-

    2, entry 5). This can be concluded that the reaction likely proceeds via the two-stage

    process described earlier. These interesting results mean that the disulfides provide two

    molecules of trifluoromethyl sulfides, which was never observed before in the other

    methods.

    1.2.4 New and Efficient Method for Synthesis of Trifluoromethyl Selenides

    Since diselenides have similar reactivities than that of disulfides, reactions of

    nucleophilic trifluoromethylation were also performed on diphenyl diselenide16.

    R-Se-Se-R TDAE CF3I DMF0 oC to RT

    R-Se-CF3

    RT overnight1 eq. 2.2 eq

    + +

    4.2

    ~200%based of number of equivalents of diselenides

    Scheme 1-15. Synthesis of trifluoromethyl selenoethers

  • 11

    Table1-3. Synthesis of trifluoromethyl selenoethers

    Entry R NMR Yield (%)*

    1 phenyl 198

    2 4-Chlorophenyl ≈ 200

    3 methyl 180

    *based of number of equivalents of diselenides

    The methodology is efficient for both aliphatic and aromatic diselenides.

    The CF3I / TDAE methodology are very efficient for many electrophilic subtrates,

    we are interested now to extend this methodology to longer perfluorinated chains by

    using other perfluoroalkyl iodides. We would be able to access to a higher amount

    biologically active compounds.

  • 12

    CHAPTER 2 SYNTHESIS OF PERFLUOROALKYL THIO AND SELENOETHERS

    2.1 Introduction

    Parallel to trifluorothioethers, trifluoroselenoethers, longer perfluoroalkyl chains are also

    developed to be used as biologically active compounds. Few examples are given below.

    Cl CF3

    Cl

    N

    SH3C

    SCF2CF3

    NH2

    HN

    Br

    Br SCF2CF3O

    Figure 2-1. 2A28: insecticide Figure 2-2. 2B29: insecticide

    Cl

    CF3

    Cl

    NN

    CNSC4F9

    NHN

    Figure 2-3. 2C30: pesticide

    Despite the increasing interest in perfluoroalkyl sulfides, few methods have been

    developed to synthesize them. The two main methods consists in first through SRN1

    reaction of aryl thiolates with perfloroalkyl iodide31 or bromide.32 The second method

    involves perfluoroalkyl anion, generated from thermal decarboxylation of potassium

  • 13

    perfluoroalkyl carboxylate,33 with aryl disulfides with the inconvenience of possible

    carbanion rearrangement or decomposition and one half of the disulfide is wasted.

    Another notable method for synthesis of perfluoroalkyl selenides consists in reaction

    between perfluoroalkyl radicals and diselenides.34 So far there is no efficient method for

    synthesis of perfluoroalkyl aliphatic sulfides.

    PhS-SPh + CF3CF2CO2K∆ PhS-CF2CF3 + PhSK

    70 %33

    PhSe-SePh + 2 C4F9IHOCH2SO2Na 2 PhSe-C4F9

    57%34

    PhSH + C4F9I NaH PhS-C4F9

    66% 31

    PhSK + CF3CF2Br PhS-CF2CF3

    33% 32

    Scheme 2-1. Different methods for synthesis of perfluoroalkyl sulfides and selenides

    Our laboratories have developed a new and efficient method for synthesis of

    trifluoromethyl sulfides and selenides, using CF3I / TDAE system.16 This methodology

    has now been extended to longer perfluoroalkyl iodides.

    R-S-S-R TDAE CF3I DMF0 oC to RT

    R-S-CF3+ +

    RT several hr1 eq. 2.2 eq 4.2 eq

    180 - 200%based of equivalentsof disulfides

    Scheme 2-2. Synthesis of trifluoromethyl sulfides with CF3I / TDAE methodology

  • 14

    2.2 Synthesis of Pentafluoroethyl Thioethers

    The same way that TDAE reduces trifluoromethyl iodide into trifluoromethyl

    anion, pentafluoroethyl iodide was also expected to be reduced by TDAE into

    pentafluoroethyl anion. The tandem process, involving nucleophilic attack of

    trifluoromethyl anion to disulfide followed by SRN1 by the resulting thiolate on the excess

    of CF3I (Scheme 2-3), was also expected.

    TDAE CF3I

    CF3R-S-S-R

    R-S CF3I

    CF3

    R-S-CF3

    R-S-CF3

    I

    I

    R-S

    + TDAE 2+ +

    + +

    + +

    Scheme 2-3. Tandem CF3I process in the synthesis of trifluoromethyl sulfides16

    The first experiment was carried out using 1 equivalent of phenyl disulfide, 4.2

    equivalents of C2F5I and 2.2 equivalents of TDAE added at -20 ºC. The color of the

    solution turned quickly deep red as TDAE was introduced. This may show the formation

    of the complex between TDAE and C2F5I, like in the case between TDAE and CF3I. The

    reaction mixture was allowed to warm up slowly. But unlike CF3I where the complex

    with TDAE starts decomposing at 0 °C, the complex with C2F5I started decomposing

    around -10 ºC, as white salt could be seen forming. Apparently the complex between

    C2F5I and TDAE is less stable than that with CF3I. But the fact that TDAE was able to

    form a complex with C2F5I was a good sign meaning that the reaction may proceed in the

    same way as with CF3I / TDAE. The mixture was stirred overnight. 19F NMR was taken

    to calculate the yield. The reaction yielded 198 % based on the number of equivalents of

    disulfides (Table 2-1, entry 1).

  • 15

    R-S-S-R TDAE CF3CF2I DMF-10 oC to RT

    R-S-CF2CF3+ +

    RT several hr1 eq. 2.2 eq 4.2 eq

    Scheme 2-4. Pentafluoroethylation of disulfides

    Reactions with different disulfides (aromatic and aliphatic) were then performed.

    The results are shown in Table 2-1.

    Table 2-1. Synthesis of pentafluoroethyl thioethers

    Entry R time at RT (hrs) NMR yield*

    1 Phenyl32 12 >198

    2 phenyl 2 >198

    3 ethyl 2 135

    4 ethyl 4 170

    5 ethyl 12 175

    6 butyl 12 180

    7 2-pyridyl35 2 >198

    8 4-pyridyl 2 190

    *Based on the number of equivalents of disulfides

    The entries 2, 7 and 8 proved that, as in the case of CF3I, 2 hours are sufficient to

    obtain quantitative yield for aryl disulfides. But in entries 3 to 5, two, even four hours

    didn’t seem to be sufficient to obtain good yields in the case of aliphatic disulfides. The

    mixture required to stirring overnight to be able to obtain 175 %. Even though, the yields

    are very similar to the ones with CF3I, aliphatic disulfides require a much longer time.

    This may be explained by the fact that it is more diificult for aliphatic thiolates to

    undergo SRN1 reaction. Somehow the presence of TDAE seems to enhance the reactivity

  • 16

    of aliphatic thiolates on SRN1 reaction, since we could always obtain good yields from

    aliphatic disulfides with CF3I / TDAE system. In the case of C2F5I the complex formed

    with TDAE is less stable than with CF3I and this may one of the reasons why the reaction

    is slower for aliphatic disulfides. It may also come from the fact that C2F5I is less reactive

    as a substrate in the SRN1 process.

    In spite of longer reaction time for aliphatic disulfides, the yields obtained are

    similar to the ones from CF3I. The two halves of the disulfides are used efficiently to

    form two molecules of pentafluorethyl thioethers.

    2.3 Synthesis of Pentafluoroethyl Selenoethers

    Since diselenides have similar reactivities as disulfides. The reactions of

    nucleophilic pentafluoroethylation were also performed on diselenides.

    R-Se-Se-R TDAE CF3CF2I DMF-10 oC to RT

    R-Se-CF2CF3

    RT overnight1 eq. 2.2 eq

    + +

    Scheme 2-5. Pentafluoroethylation of diselenides

    Table 2-2. Synthesis of pentafluoroethyl selenoethers

    Entry R Eq. of C2F5I NMR yield* (%)

    1 Phenyl34 2.2 ≈ 100

    2 phenyl 4.2 ≈ 200

    3 4-chlorophenyl 4.2 ≈ 200

    *Based on the number of equivalents of diselenides

    As expected, from 1 equivalent of diselenides, 2.2 equivalents of C2F5I gave

    quantitatively 1 equivalent of pentafluoroethyl selenides (Table 2-2, entry 1) and 4.2

    equivalents provided efficiently 2 equivalents of selenides.

  • 17

    2.4 Synthesis of Perfluorobutyl Thioethers

    Since the nucleophilic perfluoroalkylation using TDAE was successfully extended

    to C2F5I, longer perfluoroalkyl iodides were then considered for experiments, we decided

    to performed reactions with nonafluorobutyl iodided

    R-S-S-R TDAE C4F9I DMF-20 oC to RT

    R-S-C4F9+ +

    RT overnight1 eq. 2.2 eq

    Scheme 2-6. Synthesis of perfluorobutyl thioethers

    The reactions were performed in the same fashion as the usual reactions of

    trifluoromethylation of disulfides, with the difference that C4F9I is a liquid instead of a

    gas like CF3I or C2F5I, the total reflux condenser was not needed any longer. The

    complex C4F9I / TDAE seems to be much less unstable than the ones from CF3I / TDAE,

    since the usual TDAE salt was formed just above -20 ºC, very shortly after the addition of

    TDAE.

    Table 2-3. Synthesis of perfluorobutyl thioethers Entry R Eq. of C4F9I NMR yield* (%)

    1 Phenyl36 2.2 70

    2 ethyl 2.2 40

    3 butyl 2.2 40

    4 2-pyridyl37 2.2 ≈100

    5 4-pyridyl 2.2 ≈200

    6 phenyl 4.4 140

    7 butyl 4.4 40

    8 2-pyridyl 4.4 195 *Based on the number of equivalents of disulfides

  • 18

    Aryl disulfides gave satisfactory to good yields (Table 2-3, entries 1 and 4) when

    2.2 equivalents of C4F9I were used. But aliphatic disulfides resulted in only modest

    yields, 40%, (Table 2-3, entries 2 and 3). This may be explained by the low stability of

    the C4F9I / TDAE complex or the low reactivity of C4F9¯ anion towards aliphatic

    disulfides. The case of 4-pyridyl disulfide (Table 2-3, entry 5) proved to be very

    interesting. With only 2.2 equivalents of C4F9I, we were able to obtain 2 equivalents of

    perfluorobutyl 4-pyridyl sulfide, where usually 4.2 equivalents were needed to obtain the

    same results in other cases. This means that the tandem process16 (where the

    perfluoroalkyl anion, formed by reduction of perfluoroalkyl iodide by TDAE, attacks

    disulfide to form the first thioether and then the resulting thiolate reacts with the excess

    of perfluoroalkyl iodide through SRN1 reaction to form the second thioether (Scheme 2-

    3)) is not applicable anymore in this case. TDAE didn’t reduce C4F9I into C4F9¯anion but

    instead reduced entirely 4-pyridyl disulfide, forming 2 equivalents of thiolate which react

    with C4F9I through SRN1 mechanism. It seems that C4F9I is not as reactive towards TDAE

    as CF3I or C2F5I and since the disulfide was also present in the reaction mixture when

    TDAE was added and aryl disulfides can be easily reduced, TDAE preferably reduced 4-

    pyridyl disulfide over C4F9I. This problem was not encountered in the case of CF3I and

    C2F5I because their reactivity towards TDAE was high enough that TDAE reduced them

    first.

    When 4.4 equivalents of C4F9I were used on phenyl or 2-pyridyl disulfide, 140 %

    and 195 % of thioethers were obtained respectively (Table 2-3, entries 6 and 8). But 40 %

    yield was only obtained for butyl disulfide, the same yield as when 2.2 equivalents of

  • 19

    C4F9I were used. It seems that aliphatic thiolates anions couldn’t undergo reaction at all

    through an SRN1 reaction with C4F9I.

    2.5 Synthesis of Perfluorobutyl Selenoethers

    The syntheses of perfluorobutyl selenides were also performed.

    R-S-S-R TDAE C4F9I DMF-20 oC to RT

    R-S-C4F9+ +

    RT overnight1 eq. 2.2 eq

    Scheme 2-7. Synthesis of perfluorobutyl selenides

    Table 2-4. Synthesis of perfluorobutyl selenides

    Entry R Eq. of C4F9I NMR yield* (%)

    1 Phenyl34 2.2 ≈ 200

    2 methyl 2.2 ≈ 200

    *Based on the number of equivalents of diselenides

    As with 4-pyridyl disulfide, both aryl and aliphatic diselenides only underwent

    through SRN1 process, resulting in nearly 200 % yields when 2.2 equivalents of C4F9I

    were used (Table 2-4). Contrary to disulfides, aliphatic deselenides could react

    quatitatively with C4F9I via SRN1 process.

    2.6 Conclusion

    The nucleophilic perfluoroalkylation methodology developed with CF3I / TDAE

    system was successfully extended to C2F5I: similar results were obtained and the two

    halves of disulfides and deselenides were efficiently used. The methodology seemed to

    reach its limits with C4F9I. Whereas some aryl disulfides still gave good yields, aliphatic

    disulfides resulted in poor yields. But the most important point is the fact that for some

    disulfides and for all the diselenides, TDAE was unable to react with C4F9I and

  • 20

    preferably reduced disulfides or diselenides instead, forcing the reactions to undergo

    exclusively through SRN1 mechanism of thiolate anion. From a synthetic point of view,

    this didn’t present a problem. On the contrary, a smaller amount of TDAE and

    perfluorobutyl iodide was used to give 200% yields. But in the mechanistic point of view,

    the tandem process, where the perfluoroalkyl iodide switches roles from being a reactant

    to being a substrate in one pot reaction, couldn’t be applied anymore and the role of

    TDAE was only to reduce the disulfides. Moreover reducing disulfides to form thiolates

    seems to be much less convenient than deprotonating a more easily available thiols by a

    base, as the usual methods for perfluoralkyl thioether synthesis via SRN1 reactions.

    However this C4F9I / TDAE, even when TDAE served only as reductant of

    disulfides, still presents an advantage to other methods where the yields were not higher

    than 60 %31,34

    2.7 Experimental

    Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) spectra were recorded on a Varian Unity plus

    300 MHz Spectrometer system. The proton (1H) NMR were recorded at 300 MHz with

    external tetramethylsilane (TMS, δ = 0.00 ppm) as a reference. Fluorine (19F) and proton

    (1H) NMR were recorded at 300 MHz with external fluorotrichloromethane (CFCl3, δ =

    0.00 ppm) as a reference for 19F NMR and TMS (δ = 0.00 ppm) for 1H NMR. Deuterated

    chloroform (CDCl3) was used as NMR solvent.

    2.7.1 General Synthesis of Pentafluoroethyl Thio and Selenoethers : Synthesis of Phenyl Pentafluoroethyl Sulfide

    In 25 mL, 3-neck-round bottom flask, equipped with a dewar type condenser and

    N2, diphenyl disulfide (0.8 g, 3.68 mmol) was disolved in 10 mL of anhydrous DMF. The

    solution was cooled at -20 ºC. Pentafluoroethyl iodide (3.8 g, 15.45 mmol) was then

  • 21

    introduced to the solution. TDAE (2 mL, 8.1 mmol) was added around -15 ºC. The

    reaction mixture became quickly dark red. The reaction was allowed to warm up slowly

    to room temperature. And as the bath temperature reached -10 ºC white solid was formed.

    The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 2 hours (or overnight in the case

    of alkyl disulfides). The orange solution was filtered and the solid was washed with

    diethyl ether. The orange solution was filtered and the solid was washed with diethyl

    ether (20 mL). 20 mL of water was added to the ether solution. The two phases were

    separated and the aqueous phase was extracted with 20 mL of ether 2 more times. The

    combined ether layers were washed with brine and dried over MgSO4. The solvent was

    removed and the crude product was purified by silica gel chromatography (CH2Cl2 /

    hexanes = 1:9) to give phenyl pentafluoroethyl sulfide in the yield of 198%

    19F NMR(300 MHz, CDCl3) δ -83.00 (t, JFF = 3.1 Hz , 3F, CF3); -92.32 (q, JFF = 3.1

    Hz ,2F, CF2) ppm

    Ethyl Pentafluoroethyl Sulfide

    1H NMR(300 MHz, CDCl3) δ 2.70 (q, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H, CH2); 1.32 (t, J = 7.2 Hz,

    3H, CH3)

    19F NMR(300 MHz, CDCl3) δ -83.00 (t, JFF = 3.2 Hz ,3F, CF3); -92.32 (q, JFF = 3.2

    Hz, 2F, CF2) ppm

    Butyl Pentafluoroethyl Sulfide

    1H NMR(300 MHz, CDCl3) δ 2.69 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 2H, CH2); 1.66 (quintet, J = 7.6

    Hz, 2H, CH2); 1.42 (sextuplet, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H, CH2); 0.93 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 3H, CH3)

    19F NMR(300 MHz, CDCl3) δ -82.95 (t, JFF = 3.2 Hz ,3F, CF3); -92.55 (q, JFF = 3.2

    Hz, 2F, CF2) ppm

  • 22

    2-Pyridyl Pentafluoroethyl Sulfide35

    1H NMR(300 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.47 (m, 1H, ArH); 7.62 (m, 2H, ArH); 7.11 (m, 1H,

    ArH)

    19F NMR(300 MHz, CDCl3) δ -83.17 (t, JFF = 2.01 Hz ,3F, CF3); -91.03 (q, JFF =

    2.01 Hz ,2F, CF2) ppm

    4-Pyridyl Pentafluoroethyl Sulfide

    1H NMR(300 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.51 (dd, J1 = 4.8 Hz, J2 = 2.0 Hz, 2H, ArH); 7.37

    (dd, J1 = 4.7 Hz, J2 = 1.75 Hz, 2H, ArH)

    19F NMR(300 MHz, CDCl3) δ -82.95 (t, JFF = 2.14 Hz , 3F, CF3); -90.78 (q, JFF =

    2.14 Hz, 2F, CF2) ppm

    Phenyl Pentafluoroethyl Selenide34

    19F NMR(300 MHz, CDCl3) δ -84.74 (t, JFF = 3.2 Hz, 3F); -92.14 (q, JFF = 3.2 Hz,

    2F, CF2) ppm

    2.7.2 General Synthesis of Nonafluorobutyl Thio and Selenoethers : Synthesis of Phenyl Nonafluorobutyl Sulfide

    In a 25 mL round bottom flask, equipped with a rubber septum and N2, diphenyl

    disulfide (0.8 g, 3.68 mmol) was disolved in 10 mL of anhydrous DMF. The solution was

    cooled at -30 ºC. Nonafluorobutyl iodide (1.4 mL, 15.45 mmol) was then introduced to

    the solution. TDAE (2 mL, 8.1 mmol) was added around -20 ºC. The reaction mixture

    became quickly dark red. White solid was formed shortly after the addition of TDAE.

    The mixture was allowed to warm up slowly to the room temperature was stirred

    overnight. The orange solution was filtered and the solid was washed with diethyl ether

    (20 mL). 20 mL of water was added to the ether solution. The two phases were separated

    and the aqueous phase was extracted with 20 mL of ether 2 more times. The combined

  • 23

    ether layers were washed with brine and dried over MgSO4. The solvent was removed

    under vacum and the crude product was purified by silica gel chromatography (CH2Cl2 /

    hexanes = 1:9) to give phenyl nonafluorobutyl sulfide in the yield of 140%

    19F NMR(300 MHz, CDCl3) δ -81.28 (t, JFF = 10.2 Hz , 3F, CF3); -87.43 (m, 2F,

    SCF2); -120.46 (m, 2F, CF2); -125.90 (m, 2F, CF2) ppm

    Ethyl Nonafluorobutyl Sulfide

    1H NMR(300 MHz, CDCl3) δ 2.70 (q, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H, CH2); 1.32 (t, J = 7.2 Hz,

    3H, CH3)

    19F NMR(300 MHz, CDCl3) δ -81.30 (t, JFF = 8.9 Hz , 3F, CF3); -87.80 (m, 2F,

    SCF2); -121.05 (m, 2F, CF2); -125.60 (m, 2F, CF2) ppm

    Butyl Nonafluorobutyl Sulfide

    1H NMR(300 MHz, CDCl3) δ 2.69 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 2H, CH2); 1.66 (quintet, J = 7.6

    Hz, 2H, CH2); 1.42 (sextuplet, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H, CH2); 0.93 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 3H, CH3)

    19F NMR(300 MHz, CDCl3) δ -81.35 (t, JFF = 8.5 Hz , 3F, CF3); -87.68 (m, 2F,

    SCF2); -120.97 (m, 2F, CF2); -125.48 (m, 2F, CF2) ppm

    2-Pyridyl Nonafluorobutyl Sulfide37

    1H NMR(300 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.47 (m, 1H, ArH); 7.62 (m, 2H, ArH); 7.11 (m, 1H,

    ArH)

    19F NMR(300 MHz, CDCl3) δ -81.13 (t, JFF = 10.7 Hz , 3F, CF3); -86.13 (m, 2F,

    SCF2); -120.35 (m, 2F, CF2); -125.70 (m, 2F, CF2) ppm

    4-Pyridyl Nonafluorobutyl Sulfide

    1H NMR(300 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.51 (dd, J1 = 4.8 Hz, J2 = 2.0 Hz, 2H, ArH); 7.37

    (dd, J1 = 4.7 Hz, J2 = 1.75 Hz, 2H, ArH)

  • 24

    19F NMR(300 MHz, CDCl3) δ -81.20 (t, JFF = 10.5 Hz , 3F, CF3); -86.00 (m, 2F,

    SCF2); -120.25 (m, 2F, CF2); -125.60 (m, 2F, CF2) ppm

    Phenyl Nonafluorobutyl Selenide34

    19F NMR(300 MHz, CDCl3) δ -81.47 (t, JFF = 10.7 Hz , 3F, CF3); -87.34 (m, 2F,

    SCF2); -119.14 (m, 2F, CF2); -126.05 (m, 2F, CF2) ppm

  • 25

    CHAPTER 3 PERFLUOROALKYLATION OF IMINE TOSYLATES

    3.1 Introduction

    Our laboratories have developed methodologies for nucleophilic

    trifluoromethylation of numerous substrates, such as aldehydes12, cyclic sulfates15,

    benzoyl chlorides13 or disulfides16, using CF3I / TDAE system. Trifluoromethylamines

    are very interesting compounds because they can serve as synthetic intermediates to

    biologically active molecules, as shown in Figures 3-1 and 3-2, where 3A can be used as

    pesticide38 and 3B as pain-reliever39.

    NS

    S

    O OCF3

    NNN

    NH

    F3CNHF3C

    Figure 3-1. 3A Figure 3-2. 3B

    Previously trifluoromethylamines were only synthesized from precursors (i.e.

    ketones) already containing trifluoromethyl group.40-48 Prakash and coworkers have used

    Ruppert’s reagent (CF3TMS) with imine derivatives to prepare trifluoromethylamines49

    and, in particular, chiral trifluoromethylamines.50,51 Indeed, the use of CF3TMS proved to

    be very effective for nucleophilic trifluoromethylation of N-tosyl aldimines and N-(2-

    methyl-2- propane-sulfinyl)imines (Scheme 3-1), with the latter reactions exhibiting

    excellent diastereoselectivity.

  • 26

    Simple alkyl- or aryl-substituted imines are relatively unreactive toward

    nucleophilic trifluoromethylation, although Blazejewski and co-workers were able to

    obtain modest to good yields for aryl systems by facilitating the reaction of CF3TMS

    using TMS-imidazole.52 As Prakash showed, the reactivity of imines toward nucleophilic

    trifluoromethylation can be significantly enhanced by using N-tosylimines, with the p-

    toluenesulfonyl group being removed from the adduct by its treatment with phenol and

    48% HBr to give the respective primary amine products.49

    N

    Ph

    Ts CF3TMS NH

    Ts+TBAT

    THF, 0 - 5 oC90%

    F3C

    Ph

    N

    Ph

    S CF3TMS NH

    S+TBAT

    THF, -55 oC 80%

    tBu

    O

    tBu

    OF3C

    Ph

    d.r > 97%

    Scheme 3-1. Trifluoromethylation of imines using Ruppert’s reagent

    Using the same CF3I / TDAE methodology than developed for trifluoromethylation

    of aldehydes12, similar results53 to Prakash’s methods could be obtained (Scheme 3-2).

    Unfortunately, the analogous reactions with imines bearing aliphatic substituents on the

    imine carbon did not produce the desired adducts. Such attempts included the N-

    tosylimines of acetophenone, p-chloroacetophenone, cyclohexanone, and hexanal. In

    contrast, aliphatic aldehydes had been reported to provide adducts using Prakash’s

    CF3TMS methodology.49

  • 27

    N

    Ar

    Ts NH

    Ts

    F3C

    ArDMF, -30 - 0 oC

    62 - 86%

    CF3I / TDAE (2.2 equiv.)

    N

    Ph

    S NH

    S

    DMF, -30 - 0 oC 66%

    Tol

    O

    Tol

    OF3C

    Ph

    d.r = 87:13

    CF3I / TDAE (2.2 equiv.)

    Scheme 3-2. Trifluoromethylation of imines using CF3I / TDAE

    Parallel to trifluoromethylamines, higher perfluoroalkylamines gather also much

    interest from pharmaceutical and agrochemical industries. For example, 3C can be used

    as a treatment against osteoporosis54 and 3D as a treatment of Alzheimer’s disease55.

    N

    HN

    NH

    OCH3

    CF2CF3tBuNC

    O

    N

    OHN O

    O NH

    O

    CF2CF3

    Figure 3-3. 3C Figure 3-4. 3D

    Since in Chapter 2, we have shown that the CF3I / TDAE methodology could be extend

    to longer perfluoroalkyl iodides, such as pentafluoroethyl iodide or nonafluorobutyl

    iodide, we decided then to try to synthesize other perfluoroalkyl amines

  • 28

    3.2 Synthesis of Tosyl Imines

    O

    R2

    R1

    H2N TsBF3.OEt2 or Ts-OH

    toluene, refluxN

    R2

    R1

    Ts+

    Scheme 3-1. Synthesis of tosyl imines

    The imines were easily prepared from aromatic aldehydes and tosyl amine, as shown in

    Table 3-1. Unfortunately because of the electron withdrawing character of the tosyl

    group, tosyl amine was not reactive towards ketones or alphatic aldehydes (entries 3.14-

    3.16)

    Table 3-1. Synthesis of tosyl imines entry R1 R2 Yield (%)

    3.1

    H 80

    3.2 Me

    H 85

    3.3 Cl

    H 85

    3.4 F

    H 88

    3.5 F3C

    H 80

  • 29

    3.6 S

    H 30

    3.7 O

    H 65

    3.8 N

    CH3

    H 95

    3.9

    CH3 0

    3.10

    CF3 0

    3.11 C7H15 H 0

    3.3 Pentafluoroethylation of Tosyl Imines

    N

    H

    Ar

    Ts CF3CF2I TDAE DMF

    -20 oC to RT

    CF2CF3

    Ar NH

    H

    Ts+ +

    1 2.2 2.2

    Scheme 3-2. Nucleophilic pentafluoroethylation of tosyl imines

  • 30

    Table 3-2. Nucleophilic pentafluoroethylation of tosyl imines

    Entry Ar Yield (%) Yield with CF3I53 (%)

    3.1a

    50 86

    3.2a Me

    70 84

    3.3a Cl

    70 78

    3.4a F

    72 81

    3.5a F3C

    68 -

    3.6a S

    55 -

    3.7a O

    60 -

    3.8a N

    CH3

    0 -

  • 31

    In general, the reactions provided similar results than with CF3I / TDAE system,

    with slightly lower yields. For the case of 1-methylindol-3-imine tosylate (entry 3.10a)

    the absence of reactivity may be explained by one of the resonance forms shown in

    Figure 3-1: with the carbon being on the position 3, the indole group becomes a good

    electron donating group, reducing hugely the electrophilic character of the carbon on the

    imine, thus the lack of reactivity towards C2F5¯ nucleophile.

    N

    N

    Ts

    N

    N

    Ts

    Figure 3-5. A resonance form of N-(N-methyl-3-indolylmethylene)-p-methylbenzenesulfonamide

    3.4 Perfluorobutylation of Tosyl Imines

    Since good yields could be obtained with C2F5I, experiments with C4F9I were performed

    to extend further the methodology

    N

    H

    Ar

    Ts C4F9I TDAE DMF

    -20 oC to RT

    C4F9

    Ar NH

    H

    Ts+ +

    1 2.2 2.2

    Scheme 3-3. Nucleophilic perfluorobutylation of tosyl imines

    In general the yields are lower than with C2F5I, but when the aryl group contains

    electron withdrawing elements, the yields are good and comparable to the ones from

    C2F5I (Table 3-3, entries 3.3b - 3.5b). Furyl and thiophenyl tosyl imines are not very

  • 32

    reactive but the yields are decent. Like as C2F5I, 1-methyl 3-indolyl tosyl imine is not

    reactive at all toward perfluoroalkylation. (Table 3-3, entry 3.8b)

    Table 3-3. Nucleophilic perfluorobutylation of tosyl imines

    Entry Ar Yield (%)

    3.2b Me

    50

    3.3b Cl

    70

    3.4b F

    70

    3.5b F3C

    75

    3.6b S

    45

    3.7b O

    40

    3.8b N

    CH3

    0

    Surprisingly the system C4F9I / TDAE provided rather good yields. Unlike with

    disulfides where C4F9I didn’t seem to be reactive enough (Chapter 2), the system C4F9I /

    TDAE provided sometimes yields similar to the ones from C2F5I / TDAE.

  • 33

    3.5 Conclusion

    The nucleophilic trifluoromethylation methodology of tosyl imines using

    trifluoromethyl iodide and TDAE could be extended successfully with pentafluoroethyl

    iodide and nonafluorobutyl iodide. Different substrates were used and provided fair to

    very good yields.

    3.6 Experimental

    Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) spectra were recorded on a Varian Unity plus

    300 MHz Spectrometer system. The proton (1H) NMR were recorded at 300 MHz with

    external tetramethylsilane (TMS, δ = 0.00 ppm) as a reference. Fluorine (19F) and proton

    (1H) NMR were recorded at 300 MHz with external fluorotrichloromethane (CFCl3, δ =

    0.00 ppm) as a reference for 19F NMR and TMS (δ = 0.00 ppm) for 1H NMR. Deuterated

    chloroform (CDCl3) was used as NMR solvent.

    3.6.1 Syntheses of Tosyl Imines

    Synthesis of N-(benzylidene)-p-methylbenzenesulfonamide (3.1)

    In a 100 mL one-neck round bottom flask, 4-toluenesulfonamide (2.57g, 15 mmol)

    and benzaldehyde (1.52 mL, 15mmol) was mixed in 40 mL of toluene. BF3·EtO2 (0.15

    mL) was added under N2. The flask was equipped with a Dean-Stark apparatus. The

    reaction mixture was refluxed for 14 hours, then cooled to room temperature and poured

    into 2M NaOH (10mL). The organic phase was washed with brine and water until neutral

    pH, dried over anhydrous magnesium sulfate and the solvent was removed by vacuum.

    The oily residue was recrystallized from ethyl acetate to give a white solid; yield: 3.11 g

    (80 %)

  • 34

    1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 9.03 (s, 1H, CH=N-Ts); 7.91 (m, 4H, ArH); 7.62 (m, 1H,

    ArH); 7.48 (m, 2H, ArH); 7.34 (m, 2H, ArH); 2.44 (s, 3H, CH3) ppm.

    Synthesis of N-(4-methylbenzylidene)-p-methylbenzenesulfonamide (3.2)

    The procedure and the workup are the same as the synthesis of N-(benzylidene)-p-

    methylbenzenesulfonamide, using 4-methylbenzaldehyde toyield 85 % of white solid

    1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 8.99 (s, 1H, CH=N-Ts); 7.88 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 2H, ArH); 7.82 (d,

    J = 8.1 Hz, 2H, ArH); 7.34 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 2H, ArH); 7.29 (d, J = 8.1 2H, ArH); 2.43 (s,

    6H, CH3) ppm.

    Synthesis of N-(4-chlorobenzylidene)-p-methylbenzenesulfonamide (3.3)

    In a 100 mL one-neck round bottom flask, 4-toluenesulfonamide (2.57g, 15 mmol)

    and 4-chlorobenzaldehyde (2.10g, 15mmol) was mixed in 40 mL of toluene. BF3·EtO2

    (0.15 mL) was added under N2. The flask was equipped with a Dean-Stark apparatus. The

    reaction mixture was refluxed for 14 hours, and then cooled to room temperature. White

    crystals precipitated upon cooling. The solid was filtered, then washed with water and

    dried under vacuum. Yield = 2.74 g (85 %)

    1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 8.99 (s, 1H); 7.89 (d, J = 6.3 Hz, 2H); 7.86 (d, J = 6.3 Hz, 2H);

    7.47 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H); 7.35 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H); 2.44 (s, 3H) ppm.

    Synthesis of N-(4-fluorobenzylidene)-p-methylbenzenesulfonamide (3.4)

    The procedure and the workup are the same as the synthesis of N-(benzylidene)-p-

    methylbenzenesulfonamide, using 4-fluorobenzaldehyde to yield 88% of white solid.

    1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 9.00 (s, 1H, CH=N-Ts); 7.96 (m, 2H, ArH); 7.89 (d, J = 8.4

    Hz, 2H, ArH); 7.35 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2H, ArH); 7.19 (m, 2H, ArH); 2.44 (s, 3H, CH3) ppm.

    19F NMR (CDCl3) δ -101.59 (t, J = 8.7 Hz, 1F) ppm.

  • 35

    Synthesis of N-(4-trifluoromethylbenzylidene)-p-methylbenzenesulfonamide (3.5)

    Following the above procedure for 3.3, by using 4-trifluoromethylbenzaldehyde

    (2mL, 15mmol), provided 3.92 g (80% yield) of white solid.

    1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 9.08 (s, 1H, CH=N-Ts); 8.04 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 2H, ArH); 7.90 (d,

    J = 8.4 Hz, 2H, ArH); 7.75 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 2H, ArH); 7.34 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H, ArH); 2.45

    (s, 3H, CH3) ppm.

    19F NMR (CDCl3) δ -63.83 (s, 3F, CF3) ppm.

    Synthesis of N-(2-thiophenylmethylene)-p-methylbenzenesulfonamide (3.6)

    In a 100 mL one-neck round bottom flask, 4-toluenesulfonamide (2.57g, 15 mmol)

    and 2-thiophenecarboxaldehyde (1.4 mL, 15mmol) was mixed in 40 mL of toluene. A

    catalytic amount of p-toluenesulfonic acid monohydrate was added. The flask was

    equipped with a Dean-Stark apparatus. The reaction mixture was refluxed for 14 hours.

    The solution turned quickly dark green and black tar was formed. After 14 hours,

    charcoal was added to the hot solution and the mixture was stirred at 100 ºC for 1 hour

    and filtered while it was still hot. The solvent was removed under vacuum.

    Recrystallization from benzene gave 1.07g (30%) of N-(2-thiophenylmethylene)-p-

    methylbenzenesulfonamide as a silvery gray solid

    1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 9.11 (s, 1H, CH=N-Ts); 7.87 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2H, ArH); 7.77 (d,

    J = 4.2 Hz, 2H, ArH); 7.34 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2H, ArH); 7.21 (m, 1H, ArH); 2.44 (s, 3H,

    CH3) ppm.

  • 36

    Synthesis of N-(2-furanylmethylene)-p-methylbenzenesulfonamide (3.7)

    The same procedure and workup as for N-(2-thiophenylmethylene)-p-

    methylbenzenesulfonamide, using 2-furfural (1.24mL, 15 mmol), gave 2.43 g (65%) of

    light brown solid.

    1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 8.81 (s, 1H, CH=N-Ts); 7.87 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H, ArH); 7.74

    (m,1H, ArH); 7.34 (m, 3H, ArH); 6.64 (dd, J = 5.1 and 3.3 Hz, 1H, ArH); 2.43 (s, 3H,

    CH3) ppm.

    Synthesis of N-(N-methyl-3-indolylmethylene)-p-methylbenzenesulfonamide (3.8)

    In a 100 mL one-neck round bottom flask, 4-toluenesulfonamide (2.57g, 15 mmol)

    and N-methyl-3-indolcarbaxaldehyde (2.39 g, 15mmol) was mixed in 40 mL of toluene.

    A catalytic amount of p-toluenesulfonic acid monohydrate was added. The flask was

    equipped with a Dean-Stark apparatus. The reaction mixture was refluxed for 14 hours.

    The solution became rapidly deep purple. After reflux, the reaction mixture was cooled to

    room temperature and the solvent was removed in vacuo. The crude solid was

    recrystallized in benzene to give 4.27 g (95% yield) of N-(N-methyl-3-indolylmethylene)-

    p-methylbenzenesulfonamide as a purple solid.

    1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 9.09 (s, 1H, CH=N-Ts); 8.30 (d, J = 6.9 Hz, 1H, ArH); 7.89 (d,

    J = 8.1 Hz, 2H, ArH); 7.74 (s, 1H, ArH); 7.33 (3, 5H, ArH); 3.88 (s, 3H, N-CH3); 2.40 (s,

    3H, CH3) ppm.

    3.6.2 General Procedure for Pentafluoroethylation of Tosyl Imines : Synthesis of Methyl-N-(3,3,3,2,2-pentafluoro-1-phenyl-propyl)-benzenesulfonamide (3.1a)

    In 25 mL, 3-neck-round bottom flask, equipped with a total reflux condenser and

    N2, N-(benzylidene)-p-methylbenzenesulfonamide (0.259 g, 1 mmol) was disolved in 6

    mL of anhydrous DMF. The solution was cooled at -30 ºC. Pentafluoroethyl iodide (0.6

  • 37

    g, 2.4 mmol) was then introduced to the solution. TDAE (0.51 mL, 2.2 mmol) was added

    around -20 ºC. The reaction mixture became quickly orange red. The reaction was

    allowed to warm up slowly to room temperature. And as the bath temperature reached -

    10 ºC white solid was formed. The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature

    overnight. About 15 mL of 10% H2SO4 aqueous solution was added slowly to quench the

    reaction. As the acid solution was added, the reaction mixture first became clear as the

    TDAE salt was dissolved in water. But the mixture became cloudy again as the product

    precipitated out. The solution was stirred for a while as more and more product

    precipitated. The solid was collected via filtration and dissolved in 30 mL of ether. The

    ether solution was washed 3 times with water to eliminate remaining DMF. The ether

    phase was dried over anhydrous MgSO4 and the solvent was removed by vacuum. The

    pale yellow crude product was recrystallized in toluene to afford 0.189 g of a white solid.

    (50%)

    1H NMR (CDCl3) δ; 7.52 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H, ArH); 7.24 (m, 3H, ArH); 7.10 (m,

    4H, ArH); 5.48 (d, J = 9.9 Hz, 1H, NH); 4.97 (m, 1H, CH-N); 2.33 (s, 3H, CH3) ppm.

    19F NMR (CDCl3) δ -81.42 (s, 3F, CF2-CF3); -120.67 (dd, J1 = 291.9 Hz, J2 = 12.9

    Hz, 1F, CF-CF3); -122.86 (dd, J1 = 291.6 Hz, J2 = 12.6 Hz, 1F, CF-CF3) ppm.

    Anal. Calcd for C16H14F8NO2S: C, 50.670; H, 2.694; N, 3.694. Found: C, 50.390;

    H, 3.591; N, 3.590.

  • 38

    4-Methyl-N-[3,3,3,2,2-pentafluoro-(4-methyl-phenyl)-propyl]-benzenesulfonamide

    (3.2a) White solid (70 % yield)

    1H NMR (CDCl3) δ; 7.52 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 2H, ArH); 7.09 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 2H, ArH);

    7.02 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H, ArH); 6.98 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2H, ArH); 5.50 (d, J = 9.9 Hz, 1H,

    NH); 4.92 (m, 1H, CH-N); 2.34 (s, 3H, CH3); 2.29 (m, 3H, CH3) ppm.

    19F NMR (CDCl3) δ -81.42 (s, 3H, CF2-CF3); -120.72 (dd, J1 = 291.6 Hz, J2 = 12.6

    Hz, 1F, CF-CF3); -122.78 (dd, J1 = 291.6 Hz, J2 = 12.6 Hz, 1F, CF-CF3) ppm.

    Anal. Calcd for C17H16F5NO2S: C, 51.908; H, 4.071; N, 3.562. Found: C, 51.716;

    H, 4.015; N, 3.503.

    4-Methyl-N-[3,3,3,2,2-pentafluoro-(4-chloro-phenyl)-propyl]-benzenesulfonamide

    (3.3a) White solid (70 % yield)

    1H NMR (CDCl3) δ; 7.51 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H, ArH); 7.21 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H, ArH);

    7.13 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H, ArH); 7.05 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H, ArH); 5.24 (d, J = 9.3 Hz, 1H,

    NH); 4.98 (m, 1H, CH-N); 2.38 (s, 3H, CH3) ppm.

    19F NMR (CDCl3) δ -81.39 (s, 3H, CF2-CF3); -120.35 (dd, J1 = 293.7 Hz, J2 = 13.5

    Hz, 1F, CF-CF3); -123.33 (dd, J1 = 293.7 Hz, J2 = 13.5 Hz, 1F, CF-CF3) ppm.

    Anal. Calcd for C16H13ClF5NO2S: C, 46.398; H, 3.141; N, 3.383. Found: C, 46.255;

    H, 3.122; N, 3.355.

    4-Methyl-N-[3,3,3,2,2-pentafluoro-(4-fluoro-phenyl)-propyl]-benzenesulfonamide

    (3.4a) White solid (72 % yield)

    1H NMR (CDCl3) δ; 7.52 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H, ArH); 7.12 (m, 4H, ArH); 6.92 (t, J =

    8.4 Hz, 2H, ArH); 5.37 (d, J = 9.3 Hz, 1H, NH); 4.98 (m, 1H, CH-N); 2.36 (s, 3H, CH3)

    ppm.

  • 39

    19F NMR (CDCl3) δ -81.39 (s, 3H, CF2-CF3); -111.84 (m, 1F, ArF) -120.60 (dd, J1

    = 291.3 Hz, J2 = 11.1 Hz, 1F, CF-CF3); -123.19 (dd, J1 = 293.7 Hz, J2 = 13.5 Hz, 1F, CF-

    CF3) ppm.

    Anal. Calcd for C16H13F6NO2S: C, 48.363; H, 3.274; N, 3.526. Found: C, 48.259;

    H, 3.266; N, 3.333

    4-Methyl-N-[3,3,3,2,2-pentafluoro-(4-trifluoromethyl-phenyl)-propyl]-

    benzenesulfonamide (3.5a) White solid (68 % yield)

    1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 7.47 (d, J = 6.1 Hz, 2H, ArH); 7.45 (d, J = 6.1 Hz, 2H, ArH);

    7.23 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 2H, ArH); 7.06 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 2H, ArH); 5.65 (d, J = 9.9 Hz, 1H,

    NH); 5.05 (m, 1H, CH-CF2); 2.31 (s, 3H, CH3) ppm.

    19F NMR (CDCl3) δ -63.54 (s, 3F, CF3); -81.41 (s, 3H, CF2-CF3); -119.54 (dd, J1 =

    292.5 Hz, J2 = 14.4 Hz, 1F, CF-CF3); -123.91 (dd, J1 = 292.5 Hz, J2 = 14.4 Hz, 1F, CF-

    CF3) ppm.

    Anal. Calcd for C17H13F8NO2S: C, 45.638; H, 2.908; N, 3.132. Found: C, 45.340;

    H, 2.833; N, 3.011.

    4-Methyl-N-[3,3,3,2,2-pentafluoro-(2-thiophenyl)-propyl]-benzenesulfonamide (3.6a)

    White solid (55 % yield)

    1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 7.58 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H, ArH); 7.25 (m, 1H); 7.17 (d, J = 8.4

    Hz, 2H, ArH); 6.88 (m, 2H); 5.34 (m, 1H, CH-N); 5.018 (m, 1H, NH) 2.38 (s, 3H, CH3)

    ppm.

    19F NMR (CDCl3) δ -82.29 (s, 3H, CF2-CF3); -120.71 (dd, J1 = 289.2 Hz, J2 = 11.1

    Hz, 1F, CF-CF3); -123.36 (dd, J1 = 289.2 Hz, J2 = 11.1 Hz, 1F, CF-CF3) ppm.

  • 40

    Anal. Calcd for C14H12F5NO2S2: C, 43.636; H, 3.117; N, 3.636. Found: C, 43.578;

    H, 3.099; N, 3.620.

    4-Methyl-N-[3,3,3,2,2-pentafluoro-(2-furanyl)-propyl]-benzenesulfonamide (3.7a)

    Light brown solid (60 % yield)

    1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 7.60 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H, ArH); 7.19 (m, 3H); 6.21 (m, 2H,

    ring); 5.33 (d, J = 10.2 Hz, 1H, NH); 5.11 (m, 1H, CH-CF2); 2.38 (s, 3H, CH3) ppm.

    19F NMR (CDCl3) δ -82.02 (s, 3H, CF2-CF3); -120.72 (dd, J1 = 291.3 Hz, J2 = 13.2

    Hz, 1F, CF-CF3); -122.33 (dd, J1 = 289.2 Hz, J2 = 13.1 Hz, 1F, CF-CF3) ppm.

    Anal. Calcd for C14H12F5NO3S: C, 45.528; H, 3.252; N, 3.790. Found: C, 45.246;

    H, 3.255; N, 3.747.

    3.6.3 General Procedure for Perfluorobutylation of Tosyl Imines: Synthesis of 4-Methyl-N-[5,5,5,4,4,3,3,2,2-nonafluoro-(4-methyl-phenyl)-propyl]-benzenesulfonamide (3.2b)

    In a 25 mL round bottom flask, connected with N2, N-(4-methylbenzylidene)-p-

    methylbenzenesulfonamide (0.273 g, 1 mmol) was disolved in 6 mL of anhydrous DMF.

    The solution was cooled at -30 ºC. Nonafluorobutyl iodide (0.38 mL, 2.2 mmol) was then

    introduced to the solution. TDAE (0.51 mL, 2.2 mmol) was added around -20 ºC. The

    reaction mixture became quickly orange red and white solid was formed shortly after the

    addition of TDAE. The reaction was allowed to warm up slowly to room temperature.

    The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature overnight. About 15 mL of 10%

    H2SO4 aqueous solution was added slowly to quench the reaction. As the acid solution

    was added, the reaction mixture first became clear as the TDAE salt was dissolved in

    water. But the mixture became cloudy again as dark brown oil could be seen forming.

    The solution was stirred for several hours as more brown vicous oil was formed. 30 mL

  • 41

    of ether were added to dissolve the oil. The two phases were separated and the ether

    solution was washed 3 times with water to eliminate remaining DMF. The ether phase

    was dried over anhydrous MgSO4 and the solvent was removed by vacuum. The pale

    yellow crude product was recrystallized in toluene to afford 0.189 g of a white solid.

    (50%)

    1H NMR (CDCl3) δ; 7.51 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H, ArH); 7.09 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 2H, ArH);

    7.00 (m, 4H, ArH); 5.33 (d, J = 9.9 Hz, 1H, NH); 5.04 (m, 1H, CH-N); 2.34 (s, 3H, CH3);

    2.29 (s, 3H, CH3) ppm.

    19F NMR (CDCl3) δ -81.43 (t, J = 9.9, 3F, CF2-CF3); -116.98 (dm, J1 = 301.5 Hz, ,

    1F, CF-CH); -118.88 (dm, J1 = 301.5 Hz, 1F, CF-CH); -121.47 (m, 2F, CF2); 126.53 (m,

    2F, CF2) ppm.

    Anal. Calcd for C19H16F9NO2S: C, 46.212; H, 3.243; N, 2.837. Found: C, 46.239;

    H, 3.185; N, 2.821

    4-Methyl-N-[5,5,5,4,4,3,3,2,2-nonafluoro-(4-chloro-phenyl)-propyl]-

    benzenesulfonamide (3.3b) White solid (70 % yield)

    1H NMR (CDCl3) δ; 7.50 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H, ArH); 7.18 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2H, ArH);

    7.11 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 2H, ArH); 7.04 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H, ArH) 5.60 (d, J = 9.9 Hz, 1H,

    NH); 5.07 (m, 1H, CH-N); 2.37 (s, 3H, CH3) ppm.

    19F NMR (CDCl3) δ -81.41 (t, J = 11.1, 3F, CF2-CF3); -116.52 (dm, J1 = 304.8 Hz,

    1F, CF-CH); -119.38 (d3, J1 = 304.8 Hz, 1F, CF-CH); -121.37 (m, 2F, CF2); 126.55 (m,

    2F, CF2) ppm.

    Anal. Calcd for C18H13ClF9NO2S: C, 42.038; H, 2.530; N, 2.724. Found: C, 41.904;

    H, 2.457; N, 2.685.

  • 42

    4-Methyl-N-[5,5,5,4,4,3,3,2,2-nonafluoro-(4-trifloromethyl-phenyl)-propyl]-

    benzenesulfonamide (3.5b) White solid (75 % yield)

    1H NMR (CDCl3) δ; 7.47 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 2H, ArH); 7.42 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H, ArH);

    7.22 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 2H, ArH); 7.04 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H, ArH) 5.99 (d, J = 10.2 Hz, 1H,

    NH); 5.16 (m, 1H, CH-N); 2.31 (s, 3H, CH3) ppm.

    19F NMR (CDCl3) δ -63.57 (s, 3F, Ar-CF3); -81.41 (t, J = 11.1 Hz, 3F, CF2-CF3); -

    115.84 (dm, J = 304.5 Hz, 1F, CF-CH); -119.77 (dm, J = 304.5 Hz, 1F, CF-CH); -121.33

    (m, 2F, CF2); 126.52 (m, 2F, CF2) ppm.

    Anal. Calcd for C19H13F12NO2S: C, 41.654; H, 2.375; N, 2.558. Found: C, 41.751;

    H, 2.297; N, 2.553

    4-Methyl-N-[5,5,5,4,4,3,3,2,2-nonafluoro-(2-thiophenyl -phenyl)-propyl]-

    benzenesulfonamide (3.6b) White solid (45 % yield)

    1H NMR (CDCl3) δ; 7.57 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 2H, ArH); 7.23 (m, 1H, ring); 7.14 (d, J =

    8.1 Hz, 2H, ArH); 6.90 (m, 1H, ring); 6.83 (m, 1H, ring); 5.42 (m, 2H, CH-N and NH);

    2.36 (s, 3H, CH3) ppm.

    19F NMR (CDCl3) δ -81.39 (t, J = 11.1 Hz, 3F, CF2-CF3); -116.69 (dm, J = 297.9

    Hz, 1F, CF-CH); -119.22 (dm, J = 297.9 Hz, 1F, CF-CH); -121.47 (m, 2F, CF2); 126.52

    (m, 2F, CF2) ppm.

    Anal. Calcd for C16H12F9NO2S2: C, 39.555; H, 2.472; N, 2.884. Found: C, 39.567;

    H, 2.421; N, 2.778

  • 43

    4-Methyl-N-[5,5,5,4,4,3,3,2,2-nonafluoro-(2-furanyl-phenyl)-propyl]-

    benzenesulfonamide (3.7b) Brown solid (40 % yield)

    1H NMR (CDCl3) δ; 7