symposium 2015

GLOBAL URBAN DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM END-OF-YEAR SYMPOSIUM

JUNE 1, 2015

GLOBAL URBAN DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM

International program developing a methodology

for sustainable urban development and planning.

Agenda

❖ Introduction to GUDP

❖ Stockton Presentation

❖ Juarez Presentation

❖ Roundtable Discussion

❖ Next steps for GUDP

GLOBAL URBAN DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM Project Map



SU

SJSU

UACJ

UPR

LU

JUAREZ

STOCKTON

GLOBAL URBAN DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM Team Members Stockton



GLOBAL URBAN DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM Team Members Juarez



6

AEC Global Teamwork Project

1. Interdisciplinary

2. Hands-on

3. Real-world

7

Higher Education in the 21st Century

8

1. AEC Global Teamwork Project

9


10


11


12

2. Solar Decathlon 2013

13


14


15


16


17


18


19


20


21


22


23


24


25


26


27


28

3. Global Urban Development Program

29


30





Round One 2012




Round 2 + 3

❖ Real World City Partner

❖ Stockton: Michael Tubbs and RSSC

❖ Juarez: Local NGO’s

❖ Research and Design Phases

❖ Research: Diagnose the city

❖ Design: Propose solutions to problems

❖ Service-Learning Component

❖ Haas Center Principles of Ethical and Effective Service




Methodology

❖ Multidimensional (geospatial)

❖ Multisector (natural/built environment, political/economic/social structures/actors)

❖ Multiphase (understand the past, envision the future)

❖ Multifunctional (survey, analysis, decisionmaking, monitoring)

Discover and understand the phenomena that affect cities using holistic lens

Diagnose the health of cities using performance indicators

Develop new phenomena to improve trajectory of cities per indicators




Funding

Derek Ouyang (Dual B.S. ‘13, M.S. ‘15)

Global Urban Development Program - Project-based learning in global, interdisciplinary teams

- Real-world urban challenges with long-term impact

- 10/14 to 2/15: Revitalization of District 6, Stockton, CA

- 2/15 to 6/15: Revitalization of Juarez, Mexico

The SPIRE Grant will support: - Travel expenses for students and organizers

- Materials for community engagement and service

- Tools for digital collaboration and research

Thank you from the whole GUDP team!




Learning Goals

❖ Online Teamwork

❖ Interdisciplinary Teamwork

❖ Systems Thinking

❖ Human-Centered Design

❖ Research Methodology




Feedback




Feedback

❖ Valuation and confidence in team-based skills dropped by mid-point of project

❖ Valuation and confidence in analytical and design skills increased by mid-point of project

❖ More feedback and structure wanted from students

❖ Project is very time-intensive

❖ Gathering final results from both projects




Agenda









Stockton City

Hall, April 9

Final Presentation April 9, 2015

Universities

City Partners

11/14: Draft

Research

Timeline

12/12: Final

Research

4/17: Final

Design

2/20: Draft

Design

Research Design

All deliverables viewable at gudp.stanford.edu

Research

○ Place: Land use and building

development.

○ Movement: Streets, traffic, and

transport.

○ Environment: Natural features and

natural disaster concerns.

○ Health and Safety: Civic services

(fire, police, etc), health care, and

food sources.

○ Youth and Education: Schools and

demographics of the area.

○ Housing: Homeownership,

foreclosures, and property value.

○ Economic Development: Industry

and opportunity.

Research Topics

Place

Vacancies

Services

Mobility

Environment

“What would you change about the community?”

Community

Unemployment & Poverty

Education

Housing

Economic Development

Target Goals

Design

Projects Industry

Revitalization

Environmental Resiliency

Airport Way Revitalization

CSU Stockton Proposal

Industry Revitalization

Industry Revitalization Environmental Resiliency Airport Way Revitalization CSU Stockton Proposal

Food Processing - employment

• Food manufacturing accounts for 14% of all U.S. manufacturing employees,

• The US food industry represents around 16.5 million jobs, and the population spends around $1 trillion per year on food products.

• Average middle size factory in the industry employs 100-250 people.

• Various sub-industries require different investments in equipment and fulfillment of regulations; the number of employees and the investment : new jobs created ratio also vary

Industry Revitalization Environmental Resiliency Airport Way Revitalization CSU Stockton Proposal Industry Revitalization Environmental Resiliency Airport Way Revitalization CSU Stockton Proposal

Food Processing - why Stockton?

• Good location

• Proximity of inputs

• Connection to state roads

• Know how

• Affordable workforce


Tire recycling

Waste tires: ● export, ● reuse, ● ground rubber, ● ADC, ● civil engineering, ● landfill disposal, ● TDF.


Tire recycling

● Benefits to the city: tax revenue, decreased unemployment, increased mean income

● Tire Incentive Program (grants up to 40 cents per pound) ● $1 million invested = 6 jobs ● Synergies with logistics ● Possible upgrade to tire

manufacturing


Logistics

• Fast-growing industry

• US logistics jobs growth by 2022 – 21.9%, 27,600 new jobs in total

• Large share of jobs with low requirements – opportunity for unskilled workers

• $1 million investment creates 3.8 jobs

• Multiplier effect – 1 job in logistics creates 3.47 jobs in the economy

• Synergy possibilities with CSU


Logistics - why Stockton?

• Location – proximity to Bay Area, Greater Sacramento

• Lower operating costs than Bay Area

• Excellent transport links – highways, railways, intermodal yards, deep-water port

• Suitable workforce

• Less expensive and plentiful land



Industry Growth Projections


Environmental effects of industries

Food processing: ● wastewater - recycling, reuse, effective water treatment

system ● solid waste - source reduction, animal feed, composting,

small recycling plants on site ● clean technologies - closed loop/zero emission systems ● FDA and EPA regulations


Waste tires: ● problems - “overcrowded” landfills, toxin release, pest issue ● solutions - production of scrap tires (shredding) ● usage - tire-derived fuel, civil engineering applications,

ground rubber applications



Logistics: ● occupying land due to transport and storage ● consuming fuel, transport and storage equipment ● producing loss and waste due to distribution processing ● consuming material and processing waste



Industries locations The selection was made upon: ● existing land use ● location of existing nearby

industries ● location of existing industries in

Stockton with similar program ● public transport/ cycling

accessibility ● spatial needs of industry ● transportation requirements ● technology requirements ● agricultural preservation

limitations ● South Stockton Land Use

Strategy


● systematic development of land use

● infill, revitalization and mixed use

● compact shape ● coherent, heterogeneous

program ● can be developed in real

development plan

Land Use Strategy


CSU Study Programmes

● creation of study programmes as a direct connection to the proposed industries

● chance for employment or working experience ● generation of jobs demanding a higher education (“Job

Multiplier Effect”) ● employment of young personnel from local student base


Energy Efficiency Why energy efficiency?


Social Equity

Environment &

Resources

Economic Benefits

Energy Efficiency

Goal: Improve home energy efficiency to 1. Help city meet Climate Action Plan goals 2. Better meet needs of South Stockton / low-

mid income residents: affordability, comfort


Model Context

Measure Typical difficulty Typical Payback

Seal small air leaks Average homeowner

1-2 years

Insulate water heater

Average homeowner

1-2 years

Energy-saving showerhead

Average homeowner

1-3 years

Seal large air leaks Skilled homeowner 1-2 years

Seal ducts Skilled homeowner 1-2 years

Thermostat Skilled homeowner 1-2 years

Heating tune-up Expert technician 1-3 years

Source: https://www.xcelenergy.com/staticfiles/xe/Marketing/Files/SmartEnergyGuide.pdf


Cases: ●Old home (baseline)

●Only weatherstripping

●Only wall+roof insulation

●Only window improvement (film +

insulation)

●Weatherstripping + insulation + window

improvement

●New home

●Solar required to cover energy use of old

home, improved home, and new home Industry Revitalization Environmental Resiliency Airport Way Revitalization CSU Stockton Proposal

Window Film

Air Leak Sealing (weather strip + caulk)

Attic + WallInsulation

Window Film

Air Leak Sealing (weather strip + caulk)

Attic + Wall Insulation

Characteristics of baseline home

● Built in 1970’s/80’s before energy codes ● No wall/attic insulation ● Furnace/water heater has poor efficiency ● Very leaky (1 ACH) ● ~1000 square feet


Results


Results cont’d


Modeling Challenges and Shortcomings

● Limited data for comparison of lifecycle costs ● Wide range in cost estimates ● Replacement analysis not conducted ● No predictions made for changes in fuel or

electricity prices


Community Engagement

“These homes have been here for over 50 years, these homes have been here for a while. How often do people check out

these homes? ... Let’s do an evaluation of how homes are built, is there mold, are the heaters working? If people don’t

come out and do that, that’s a big issue”

“There’s this mentality of ‘Keep the lights off!’ ‘Don’t turn that on!’”

“‘Who’s gonna pay for it?’ This committee of environmentalists and

developers.. this has been one of the central things they’ve been fighting

over”



Trust

Disconnect

Outreach

Priorities


Stakeholder Analysis

Energy Efficiency Stakeholders

Residents

Contractors

City

Utility

Non Profits

Financial Institutions

Landlords

Homeowners

Renters


Existing incentives/assistance programs Name Sponsor Benefits Requirements

San Joaquin

County

Weatherization

Program

San Joaquin

County

Human

Services

Agency

Free weatherizations - measures

include insulation, repairs,

improved appliances, etc.

A member of the household receives temporary

Aid for Needy Families (TANF), Food Stamps, SSI

or SSP, Veterans and Survivors Pension or if the

household income does not exceed a certain

amount

http://www.benefits.gov/benefits/benefit-

details/1844

Energy Savings

Assistance

Program

PG&E Repair or replacement of

refrigerators, furnaces or water

heaters, insulation/

weatherproofing, efficient light

bulbs, showerheads, etc

Home 5 years or older, meets CARE guidelines

http://goo.gl/8zvcu3

Valid through May 2015

Energy Upgrade

California - whole

house

PG&E Up to $2500 in rebates PG&E Customers with single family homes

Choose measures from a menu of options

Appliance rebates PG&E Depends on the appliance Purchase of Energy Star or approved appliance


http://www.benefits.gov/benefits/benefit-details/1844






Financing Options Program type

Pro Con

PACE (HERO, Figtree) ● Approved in Stockton

● No upfront cost- pay with additional property taxes

● Vetted contractors (3 in Stockton)

● Choice of payback (5/10/15/20 years)

● Higher property tax bills

● Must pay property tax (ineligible to

renters)

On-bill financing ● No upfront cost - pay using portion of energy savings

● Good for renters- financing can stay with the property

● Not currently available

● Risk for utility if bills are not paid

Loan (i.e. from the

Golden State Finance

Authority)

● Up to $50,000 financing, 6.5% interest for 15 yr loan

● Partner with approved contractor

http://www.chfloan.org/programs/energy/overview.shtml

● Only one Stockton based contractor

● No flexibility for loan length

Warehouse for Energy

Efficiency Loans (WHEEL)

● More scalable than other approaches due to investments

from large institutions

● Pool loans (investment grade capital)

Source: WSGR White Paper

● New and unfamiliar

● Public agency approval needed

Crowdfunding (i.e.

Village Power Finance,

Mosaic)

● Community building

● More flexible

● Requires strong community

partner- may or may not exist




Outreach strategy (ESA)


Outreach cont’d


Penetration - low ● Only 1.1% of eligible customers actually

enrolled ● 11% of spending on customer enrollment ● Moderate income program unavailable in the

county Job training ● YTD - 48 people trained for ESA program ● Typically from the local area

Demonstration Home Cases

● Better Buildings Neighborhood Program: o Chula Vista: 25% of tour participants in a demonstration home

signed up for energy assessment with a contractor ● Michigan: has 8 Energy Demonstration Centers ● San Diego Center: tours, kiosks, library, rainwater harvesting,

demo garden, food service demo kitchen



Chula Vista Home

Phoenix: Meritage Deconstructed Home

SDG&E Energy Innovation Center

SDG&E Energy Innovation

Center

Detroit Ecoworks Center

Conclusions ● Many efficiency projects with quick payback ● Improved outreach necessary ● Demonstration home / Energy Center Potential

o Outreach and education o Access to subsidized materials for DIY o Potential community space for local groups o For residents ineligible for ESA: access to subsidized materials

for DIY projects and support may be useful Potential for building contractor-resident relationships


Conclusions ● Partnerships with other projects

o Integration w/ Airport Way temporary structures + tool sharing, potential for more permanent services Community garden, home improvement resource center

o CSU : potential to provide education in a growing field

o Industry analysis of Stockton’s energy efficiency job market



Airport Way

Insights on Airport Way

What would you change about the community?”


Case Studies


People’s St. Los Angeles

Federal Credit

Union

Prostoroz, Ljubljana

Superkilen, Copenhagen


Green Spaces

KaBOOM! KaBOOM! provides:

- Funding assistance - Experienced Project Manager - Build Day training/assistance

The Community provides:

- 250 sf of land - Partial funding - Volunteers for Community

Build Day - Everyday play! - Maintenance

Promote play Build a playground in a day


Temporary Program Concept


Street Art

Sports Areas

Outdoor Festivals

Temporary Structure Concept


Option 1: Home Depot Shed Option 2: Shipping Containers

Option 3: Build it Yourself Adaptable Structure

Community

Center

Section

Floor Plan

Community

Center

Structural Layering

Community Center


Master Plan Description


Phase 1: 10% green areas: ● community gardens ● children’s playground ● public park

community area: ● temporary sports

court ● community events ● temporary structures

Phase 2: 50% ● community center ● police station ● grocery store

Phase 3: 100% ● commercial programs

10%


50% 100%

Proposed Phases for Development

Phase 1

Phase 3 Phase 2




Having the physical campus in Stockton would visually reinforce the possibility of going to college to people driving by it every day.

Seeing Stocktonians who went to well-regarded schools and came back to Stockton served as an inspiration to students. The CSU could offer cultural studies, since Stockton is a diverse city and help citizens learn more about the background of others.

Economic benefits of a CSU

Economic Benefits Impact on Regional Economy Spending

Supports Regional Jobs

Local Tax Revenue

CSU Stanislaus $169 million >2000 ~$8 million


L1: MLK / Highway 99

PROs: central location, close to residential areas, good accessibility, close to commercial activities, incoherent current land use

CONs: less space for expansion, a few existing residents, no public transit route, safety may be an issue, close to industrial lands


L1: MLK / Highway 99 Alternative


L4: North Stockton PROs: a lot of space, close to residential areas,

empty lot is not suitable for low residential housing, easily approachable by car, safe neighborhood

CONs: nowhere near city center, almost no commercial activities nearby, no transit options (only car oriented)


Decision Matrix Location 1: MLK + H99

Location 2: Airport Way

Location 3: R4 + FW5

Location 4: North Stockton

Location + - o o

Accessibility + - + +

Size o + + +

Public transport - + + +

Surrounding areas + - o o

Safety o o - +

Infrastructure + o - o

Place for expansion o + o +

Nearby residents + - o +

Close to services + o - o

Table of comparison of the three locations

(+ means good, o means neutral, - means bad // parameters that are higher are more important) Industry Revitalization Environmental Resiliency Airport Way Revitalization CSU Stockton Proposal

Breakdown of GSF of CSU Stanislaus Instructional GSF 623,482 Instructional GSF / student 51.96 gsf / student

Library 123,319 Library / student 10.28 gsf / student

Housing / Dining 226,292 Housing / Dining / student 18.86 gsf / student

Administrative / Student Services 227,642 Administrative / student 18.97 gsf / student

Other Support 66,939 Other Support / Student 5.58 gsf / student

Parking spots 2908 Parking / student 24.23%

# of beds 656 Beds / students 5.47%


Calculated GSF of CSU Stockton Instructional 519,568.33 gsf

Library 102,765.83 gsf

Housing / Dining 188,576.67 gsf

Administrative / Student Services 189,701.67 gsf

Other Support 55,782.50 gsf

Parking spots 2423

# of beds 546.7

Grand total 1,056,395 gsf


Table of construction costs Construction Costs per GSF

for CSUs General Contractor

Costs

Classroom $352 $182,888,052.2

Library $311 $31,960,173.13

Housing / Dining $274 $51,670,007.58

Administration $354 $67,154,391.18

Structure and surface per parking space

$19,278 $46,710,594

Grand Total $380,383,218.1

Including Site Work Site Work assumed to be 3% of building costs

$391,794,714.6 Industry Revitalization Environmental Resiliency Airport Way Revitalization CSU Stockton Proposal

Table of example scheduling, based off of Stanford LBRE

Sample Project Type Typical Project Duration Typical Construction

Duration

Large science / medical project ( ( (

|(>25k sf)

3-5 years 2-3 years

Large office / classroom project (

|(>25k sf)

3-4 years 1-2 years

Large housing project (>25k sf) 2-3 years 1-2 years


Mock Schedule


eQuest data for MLK / Highway 99 MLK / Highway 99 Classroom

Electricity Natural Gas

Yearly Energy Usage

419,660 kWh 3302 therms

Bill $62,792 $1988

Total Bill $64,780 MLK / Highway 99 Housing


Yearly Energy Usage

181,200 kWh 0

Bill $26,929

Total Bill $26,929 Industry Revitalization Environmental Resiliency Airport Way Revitalization CSU Stockton Proposal

eQuest data for MLK / Highway 99

MLK / Highway 99 Administrative


Yearly Energy Usage 520,850 kWh 2061.8 therms

Bill $86,276 $1305

Total Bill $87,581

MLK / Highway 99 Library


Yearly Energy Usage 1,200,800 kWh 10,179 therms

Bill $195,832 $5748


eQuest data for North Stockton

North Stockton Housing


Yearly Energy Usage 364,060 kWh 0

Bill $53,533

Total Bill $53,533

North Stockton Classroom


Yearly Energy Usage 817,310 kWh 6018.2 therms

Bill $121,398 $3483

Total Bill $124,881


eQuest data for North Stockton North Stockton Administration


Yearly Energy Usage 1,081,600 kWh 3341.2 therms

Bill $175,767 $2005

Total Bill $177,772

North Stockton Library


Yearly Energy Usage 1,200,800 kWh 10,179 therms

Bill $195,832 $5748


Comparison of Yearly Energy Bills

Total Energy Bill (MLK / Highway

99)

Electricity Bill Natural Gas Bill

Housing $215,432 $0

Classroom $753,504 $23,856

Administrative $345,104 $5220

Library $195,832 $5748

Total $1,509,872 $34,824

Grand Total (per year) $1,544,696 Industry Revitalization Environmental Resiliency Airport Way Revitalization CSU Stockton Proposal

Comparison of Yearly Energy Bills

Total Energy Bill (North

Stockton)

Electricity Bill Natural Gas

Bill

Housing $214,132 $0

Classroom $728,388 $20,898

Administrative $351,534 $4010

Library $195,832 $5748

Total $1,489,886 $30,656

Grand Total (per year) $1,520,542 Industry Revitalization Environmental Resiliency Airport Way Revitalization CSU Stockton Proposal

Architectural section (scheme) ● Instructional ● Administration


List of Programming / Majors ● Nursing ● Business Administration/Management ● Supply Chain Management/Operations Management ● Education/Liberal Studies/Teaching ● Psychology ● Sociology/Social Work ● Agricultural Studies/AgriBusiness ● Food Science ● Criminal Justice ● Computer Science


Budget / Financial Aid ● < than $90 million for first few years ● Close to 90% will qualify for financial aid ● Average full-time student will have financial aid package around $8,000 ● Undergraduates will qualify for around $6,700 for need-based grants ● Need-based loan amount around $4,300 ● Tuition for academic year around $5,472 for 6 or more units, $3,174

fewer than 6 ● Credit Union along Airport Way can help with funding via loans


Public Relations ● Communicate and advocate with the local community ● Raise awareness on benefits of college education on what needs to be

done to apply to college ● Partner with local elementary/middle schools, high schools, and

community colleges ● Promote as commuter-based institution ● Inform high school counselors ● Promote college fairs


CSU Stockton


Conclusion ● Ideally, this analysis serves as a jumping point for a feasibility

study of a CSU in Stockton. ● Currently, there is an assembly bill on the topic of the

feasibility of a CSU, and this study will hopefully push CSU Stockton as being chosen and built.

● Higher education attainment is crucial for achieving many of the other goals mentioned.


Conclusion ● Partnership with other projects

o CSU Study Program to stimulate development of industries.

o Promote green technologies and lifestyle with Environmental Resiliency.

o Long term stimulation of development in Stockton, including along Airport Way.





Agenda






GLOBAL URBAN DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM: JUAREZ, MEXICO

PRESENTATION TO DR. CÉSAR EMILIANO HERNANDEZ OCHOA

MAY 29, 2015


International project developing a methodology

for sustainable development in Juarez.

Agenda

❖ Why and how GUDP got started

❖ Creating the Juarez project

❖ Research and diagnosis

❖ Design phase: downtown revitalization project, neighborhood development project

❖ Vision of Juarez and next steps for GUDP




Project Map




Team Members




Timeline

2/20/15

Preliminary

Research, Trip to

Juarez

3/27/15

Final Research

Report

5/29/15

Presentation in

Mexico City

6/8/15

Final Design

Report

1/19/15

Project Kickoff




Trip to Juarez




Current Projects

Pros

•Comprehensive over four important sectors

•Strong set of stakeholders

•Much-needed attention from federal

government

Cons

•Even more federal support is needed

•More strategic community participation

•No discussion of housing

•No discussion of environmental risk

•No small-scale experimental approach




Pros

•Comprehensive over four important sectors

•Strong set of stakeholders

•Much-needed attention from federal

government

Cons

•Even more federal support is needed

•More strategic community participation

•No discussion of housing

•No discussion of environmental risk

•No small-scale experimental approach

Current Projects

Indicators

Urban Planning Environmental

Risks

Economic

Development

Quality of Life

• Mobility • Urban infrastructure

• Floods • Water supply • Green spaces

• Job opportunities • Social welfare • Safety • NGO’s




Geospatial Research

Safety Environmental

Risks Quality of Life Unemployment




Methodology

Identified critical

areas




A B C D (DOWNTOWN)

Analysis factors: 1. Services / Equipment 2. Infrastructure 3. Local perception

Methodology

Critical areas




NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT Methodology for a neighborhood development on

border cities.

Background

Subzones

6 B

1. INFRASTRUCTURE 2. EQUIPMENT: • SCHOOLS • ECONOMY CENTERS • HEALTH SECTOR • PUBLIC BUILDINGS


border cities.

Background

Subzones

6 B

Fig. 2.2.4Sub Zona 4



border cities.

Background

Subzones

6 B



border cities.

Background

Polygons

7 B


border cities.

Background

Master Plan, Area B

CULTURAL CENTER

ROAD AXES OF INTEGRATION

INTEGRAL DESIGN AXES

8 B


border cities.

Background

Master Plan, Area A/C

8 A/C

¿Centro Historico?

vs

Background

Methodology for downtown revitalization in

Juarez.

DOWNTOWN REVITALIZATION

Historic Plan


Juarez.


Current proposal can be improved

TURN HISTORIC

CENTER INTO AN

EXPERIMENTAL

ZONE FOR

REVITALIZATION, A

LEARNING TOOL FOR THE

WHOLE CITY.

FOCUS ON DENSIFICATION,

DIVERSIFICATION, CIVIC EDUCATION,

AND RESILIENCE

GREATER BUDGET, GREATER IMPACT

Vision


Juarez.


STRATEGIC SECTORS

FIELDS KEY PROJECTS

1. MIXED USE BLOCK

2. STREET RENOVATION

3. PARK

4. COMMUNITY CENTER

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

URBAN MOBILITY & PUBLIC SPACE

CIVIC EDUCATION & ENGAGEMENT

SOCIAL

POLITICAL

ECONOMIC

ACTION PLANS

P1: OPTIMIZE LAND USE DEVELOPMENT.

P2: IMPROVE THE PRESERVATION & UPKEEP OF REAL ASSETS.

P3: IMPROVE STORM AND FLOODWATER MANAGEMENT OF URBAN INFRASTRUCTURE.

P4: INCENTIVIZE MIGRATION TO URBAN CENTER.

P5: PROMOTE TRANSPARENCY BETWEEN CITIZENS AND GOVERNMENT.

P6: ENCOURAGE CIVIC PARTICIPATION.

Horizontal plans

ENVIRONMENTAL INFRASTRUCTURE

RESILIENCY

HOUSING DEVELOPMENT

COMMUNITY SERVICES

P7: IMPROVE MOBILITY TO/FROM AND WITHIN CITY CENTER.

P8: PROMOTE DIVERSIFICATION OF BUSINESSES.

P9: PROMOTE URBAN IDENTITY AND PLACE MAKING.

P10: PROVIDE BETTER PUBLIC SERVICES.

Multisector approach

Methodology


Juarez.


ACTION PLANS











Action plans


Juarez.


ACTION PLANS











Directly related to

energy policy and

infrastructure

Action plans


Juarez.


Action plans

P1: Improve the Preservation & Upkeep of Real Assets


Juarez.


Retrofit existing

buildings for higher

performance,

stronger structure,

additional floors

for residential

Rooftop solar

helps to pay for

upkeep of

structures

Also functions as

decentralized

power source in

event of disaster

kilowatt consumption per capita - the denser the city the less energy people consume

empirical statistical studies show that a city that is twice as dense consumes 12% less energy.

Action plans

P2: Optimize Land Use Development


Juarez.


Action plans

P4: Incentivize Migration to Urban Center


Juarez.


A lot can be achieved just

through electricity tariff incentives

-10% for

downtown

Subsidies repaid by reduction in

unnecessary electricity infrastructure

sprawling to new neighborhoods

+ residents,

businesses


Juarez.


Action plans

P7: Improve Mobility To/From and Within City Center

Trolley buses on major routes to/from

city center, free city bikes within city

center


Juarez.


Action plans

P8: Promote Diversification of Businesses

● CAB

● Diversification Score

● Real Estate Market

Analysis

● Community Activities

achieving long-term

stability via

diversification


Juarez.


Action plans

P10: Provide Better Public Services

Combine infrastructure retrofits to reduce

construction costs. LED street lighting and

Wi-Fi bus stops at the same time as

electric buses or new power lines.


Juarez.


Proposal

Master Plan, Area D

GLOBAL URBAN DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM Conclusion

GUDP Methodology

city data from a multidisciplinary and academic lens

small-scale experimental community-driven testing of new ideas

Dr. Cesar Ochoa Hernandez –to support and communicate the benefits these projects would

generate in Juarez

Federal Government – to provide the city with the necessary tools

funds

Including $100,000 per year to support Stanford GUDP projects

overseeing capabilities

What we ask from you:



GLOBAL URBAN DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM Conclusion

Each City as One Link

…

One Link at a Time



GLOBAL URBAN DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM: JUAREZ, MEXICO

DISCUSSION

MAY 29, 2015




Agenda









Roundtable Discussion

❖ What interesting parallels were there in the two projects?

❖ What could be improved in the teaching methodology?

❖ What were some important lessons learned in the process as a student? An advisor?

❖ How important is the multidisciplinary nature of the project, and what are its limits?

❖ How important is the cross-institutional nature of the project, and what are its limits?

❖ How valuable is travel to a project of this nature?

❖ How important is service learning and human-centered design in the project?

❖ To what extent can current research at Stanford be integrated into this program?

❖ What are some ideas for future projects or project frameworks in GUDP?

❖ What lessons can be learned from the 2014-2015 academic for the future of GUDP/SUS?




Agenda









Next Steps

❖ Derek will continue developing GUDP as a lecturer in the SDGC program

❖ Develop the learning model as a possible framework to future SUS program projects

❖ Currently working on a 3-quarter sequence with Sichuan University, focused on either San Jose or Chengdu

❖ May also take select students as independent study or quarter-long studios to continue developing work from Stockton and Juarez

❖ Other potential partner cities down the road: Christchurch, NZ and San Salvador, Ecuador

❖ Curriculum development summer of 2015, looking for academic feedback

❖ Looking for 1-2 TA’s to assist during the year

❖ Figuring out how to create a cycle from GUDP to real experimentation back to GUDP

GLOBAL URBAN DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM Project Map



SU

SJSU

UACJ

UPR

LU

JUAREZ

STOCKTON

CHENGDU SAN JOSE

CHRISTCHURCH

EL SALVADOR

SCU

UC

symposium 2015

Education

aec global teamwork

sustainable urban development

rssc juarez

city design

design phases research

effective service

health of cities

local ngos research