sygnol ranked choice polls and the 2016 presidential election

28

Upload: flywheel

Post on 21-Jun-2015

49 views

Category:

News & Politics


3 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Sygnol Ranked Choice Polls and the 2016 Presidential Election
Page 2: Sygnol Ranked Choice Polls and the 2016 Presidential Election

Signal vs. Noise in Modern Politics

• Noise is crowding out intelligent discussion.– Negative advertising trumps real debate.– Infotainment trumps journalism.

• The noise is a manifestation of CACA Politics–We are immersed in a culture of

Character Assassination andCaricature Amplification

– Repetitive CACA is the message of our media.

Page 3: Sygnol Ranked Choice Polls and the 2016 Presidential Election

Repetitive messages make our media: The fruit of CACA Politics

Page 4: Sygnol Ranked Choice Polls and the 2016 Presidential Election

Why So Much Noise?

• Underlying sources and motivations of CACA“Journalists” attract audiences by provoking bias confirmation.Candidates skew voter behaviors by demonizing opponents.

• Amplifying factors of CACAMedia are highly dependent on seasonal political ad revenue.Big Data analytics facilitate effective micro-targeting of negative ads.Vast spending increases are enabled by Citizens United and McCutcheon.

Page 5: Sygnol Ranked Choice Polls and the 2016 Presidential Election

A Growing Windfall for Political Ads

Page 6: Sygnol Ranked Choice Polls and the 2016 Presidential Election

Fixing the Signal to Noise (s/n) Ratio

Pursuing noise reduction has failed!Campaign finance reform has failed

Donor Limits = A long history of not working out.ACLU and Libertarians alike worry about limiting speech.Big Money routes around barriers anyway.

Voluntary public financing of campaigns has failedSubsidized Spending Caps = Ignoring the deeper

problem.The strategic appeals of CACA discourse remain in

place.Expedience overrules noble declarations (Obama 2008).

Page 7: Sygnol Ranked Choice Polls and the 2016 Presidential Election

Winning Politicians <3 Negative Ads

Page 8: Sygnol Ranked Choice Polls and the 2016 Presidential Election

When Will Noise Reduction Work?

• Prospects for Election Finance reform?– Lawrence Lessig and others haven’t given up.– But no overhaul is likely before 2017, if ever.– And less spending by itself won’t disrupt s/n

ratio.

• Prospects for improved journalism?– Financial and ratings pressures never go away.– CACA-hungry mass culture knows few other

flavors.

Page 9: Sygnol Ranked Choice Polls and the 2016 Presidential Election

To change something, build a

new model that makes the existing

model obsolete.Richard Buckminster

Fuller

Page 10: Sygnol Ranked Choice Polls and the 2016 Presidential Election

Signal Improvement Strategies

• Rethinking the cure for CACA Politics

– Politics is about managed competition.– So manage it. – Create venues that bake in attractions

for signal over noise.

Page 11: Sygnol Ranked Choice Polls and the 2016 Presidential Election

Experiments and Experiences

• Indaba.org + other Ranked Choice Voting Sites– jQuery-based sortable list drives familiar Netflix-

like queue• supports highly efficient interactive ballot

– SQL-based procedures supply interactive result visualizations• Realtime Plurality, Borda, Condorcet, and Instant Runoff

tabulations

Page 12: Sygnol Ranked Choice Polls and the 2016 Presidential Election

Theoretical Background

• Deep readings of –Marshall McLuhan– Douglas

Engelbart– Terrence Deacon– Ted Nelson– John Searle

Page 13: Sygnol Ranked Choice Polls and the 2016 Presidential Election

Baking in Attractions for Signal

• Shaping a Signal-Friendly Media Venue– Content-oriented

• Serve creators, curators, and consumers:– Enable political advocates to articulate values and plans.– Facilitate rich engagement of contributors and evaluators.– Present a great show to casual and low information voters.

– Ratings-oriented• Divert investment from CACA ads and journalism:

– Get politicians to purchase placements in the new venue.– Get journalists to report on the venue’s competitions.

Page 14: Sygnol Ranked Choice Polls and the 2016 Presidential Election

Why Keep Waiting to Step Ahead?

Page 15: Sygnol Ranked Choice Polls and the 2016 Presidential Election

A Strategy for Raising Signal

• Exploit well-understood social circumstances– In the era of Big Data, delivering a well-identified audience,

however small, can attract advertisers.– Journalists and viewers are irresistibly attracted to stories

about status battles among candidates.– When politicians believe it is important not to lose a particular

game, they will seek to compete.

• In other words, – Build a new kind of arena.– Stage a clean fight.–Make the competitors pay to play.

Page 16: Sygnol Ranked Choice Polls and the 2016 Presidential Election

Some people just can’t ignore (or resist)

the call to be the Lord of the Ring

Page 17: Sygnol Ranked Choice Polls and the 2016 Presidential Election

Architecting Sygnol• Four Pillars of an Arena for High Signal Politics– Liquid Democracy for Competitors

– Voters seek proxies to represent their concerns and interests.– Politicians seek to become delegates of voter preferences.

– Ranked Choice Voting for Curators– Optimal for multi-candidate and multi-option races.– Offers a feast for Big Data wonks and horse-race handicappers.

– Utter Transparency for Consumers– Reveal authorship and cost of every ad presented in the venue.– Fully expose the governing algorithms and financial influences.

– Rewarding Employment for Founders– Build something valuable, and it will be valued.– Financial health opens up creative opportunities.

Page 18: Sygnol Ranked Choice Polls and the 2016 Presidential Election

To build Sygnol, learn from Indaba

WindowsAzure hosts Sygnol

Page 19: Sygnol Ranked Choice Polls and the 2016 Presidential Election

Bootstrapping Sygnol

1) Low Profile Prototype Creation– Test Gamified Crowdsourcing as an AppStore Toy

• Ranking Past Presidents/Reality Show Contestants, etc.

2) Attract Seeding Advertisers– Find Allies for Creation of a High Signal Venue

• League of Women Voters, FairVote, NoLabels, ICANN

3) High Profile Announcement and Launch– Ranked Choice Scientific Polls in Iowa and NH

• Demonstrate Sygnol’s distinctive technical virtues

Page 20: Sygnol Ranked Choice Polls and the 2016 Presidential Election

AimsPoll

• The medium makes the message.

• Sygnol is the publisher, IAN is the parent network, but the fastest growing audience soon after launch – the early adopters – will be watching AimsPoll.

• Each venue is locally targeted, but Iowa will be first, so the Iowa venue will set the tone of the brand.

• I also own amespoll.com

Page 21: Sygnol Ranked Choice Polls and the 2016 Presidential Election

More on Fixing the S/N Ratio

Optimize for

Highly structured candidate engagement with authenticated participants

Content refinement by participating content creators and curatorsFast periodization of liquid-democracy proxy selection and vote re-

delegation Affordable rates for content submission by participants.Incentivized advertising into topical and goal-oriented debates.Rewarding validated listeners/curators with increased creation

privileges.

Page 22: Sygnol Ranked Choice Polls and the 2016 Presidential Election

More to Come

• Refactoring the software architecture–WebAPI 2.1, Azure, MVC, XAML, IOS, Android

• Conducting, publishing, and hosting polls– AimsPoll vs. AmesPoll

• Attracting candidates in the earliest venues– Iowa, New Hampshire, South Carolina, Nevada

Page 23: Sygnol Ranked Choice Polls and the 2016 Presidential Election

The Short Pitch

• We have– A Story– A Technology– A Market

Page 24: Sygnol Ranked Choice Polls and the 2016 Presidential Election

The Story

• Mission Statement– “Building better tools for better

democracies.”• Be a part of that story.• Be a part of the Indaba Application Network

Page 25: Sygnol Ranked Choice Polls and the 2016 Presidential Election

The Technology

– Modernized Media for a Modern Electorate– Promise candidates a fair chance at equal time.– Promise viewers less noise and more signal than traditional TV.

– Liquid Democracy for Competitors– Voters seek proxies to represent their concerns and interests.– Politicians seek to become delegates of voter preferences.

– Ranked Choice Voting for Curators– Optimal for multi-candidate and multi-option races.– Offers a feast for Big Data wonks and horse-race handicappers.

– Utter Transparency for Consumers– Reveal authorship and cost of every ad presented in the venue.– Fully expose the influences of proxies and delegates.

Page 26: Sygnol Ranked Choice Polls and the 2016 Presidential Election

The Market• Iowa

– Polling ramps up in November 2014– Media spikes for Ames Straw Poll in August 2015– Iowa caucus scheduled for Monday Jan 18, 2016

• Iowa spending is likely to surpass $50 Million.– Seeking 1% of that market to be profitable– Acquiring 5% is reasonably feasible– Doing so in many more states is also feasible

• Further primary spending could surpass $200 Million– New Hampshire is Jan 26– Nevada Feb 6, South Carolina Feb 13– Super Tuesday is March 1, 2016 (CO, FL, MA, OK, TN, TX, VA, VT)

Page 27: Sygnol Ranked Choice Polls and the 2016 Presidential Election

IAN -> Sygnol -> AimsPoll

• Indaba Application Network ian– Controls licensing, Funds other projects

• Sygnol– Publisher, Platform builder

• AimsPoll +GranitePoll, PalmettoPoll, SilverPoll, etc.

– Combines localized content with network feed

Page 28: Sygnol Ranked Choice Polls and the 2016 Presidential Election

Help create an antidote for CACA Politics

For more on how it works:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QQp4myhEx-A

Contact:Craig Simon, Ph.D.

[email protected]