sustaining animal and ecosystem health in large landscapes: draft concept/discussion paper for a...
TRANSCRIPT
Sustaining Animal and Ecosystem Health
in Large Landscapes:
Draft concept/discussion paper for a programme
to address
Wildlife, Livestock and related Ecosystem
and Human Health issues
in the SADC Region
with particular reference to
Transfrontier Conservation Areas
Outline
• Origins of the proposed Project• Context• Problems and opportunities• Assumptions and approach• Overall objective & themes• Modules within themes• Budgets
Origins
Animal Health for the Environment and Development (AHEAD)
2-day Forum at World Parks Congress (WPC) Sept. 2003
Group elected a “champion” to develop a concept for a programme on Animal, Human and Ecosystem Health for theGLTFCA/Shashe-Limpopo area
David Cumming was tasked by the GLTFCA Working Group, with support from WCS, to develop the concept.
Strong regional representation Working groups across countries One southern African group (Bw, Mz, SA, Zw)
selected GLTFCA and Shashe-Limpopo as
priority areas
Origins
Animal Health for the Environment and Development (AHEAD)
Developments since WPC Sept. 2003
Next Steps: 4th Meeting of working Group
1. Preliminary concept presented to WG 8 Nov 03 in
Pretoria (Wildlife Diseases Conference)
2. Draft Concept/Discussion Paper circulated Jan 2004
3. Paper critically examined by WG at 25th Feb. 2004
meeting
4. Informal presentations of concept to SADC Secretariat on
March 3rd (Jbg.) and 16th March (Gaborone).
5. Revised Concept paper circulated 8th April, 2004 .
Context
• 20 TFCAs covering 120 million hectares
• Most in marginal, poorly developed areas
• Cross border disease issues of major concern and a major threat to TFCA concept
• Minimal integrated, cross disciplinary research
• Policy and protocols on animal health do not appear to have been developed yet
SADC Region:
GLTFCA
Context - GLTFCA
1. Key features of the GLTFCA (100,000 km2 +)
• Low altitude, high temperatures, low and uncertain rainfall, extended dry season
• Long history of wildlife/livestock interaction
• Agriculturally marginal land with very low potential apart from pockets of irrigable land
• Historically neglected, poor infra-structure and sparsely populated - relegated to wildlife and subsistence agro-pastoralism
But, effective animal disease control measures based on national borders and fences were in place (i.e. until recently!)
Context
2. Current trends
• Development of TFCAs with major focus on wildlife and culturally based tourism
• Infrastructure development and removal of fences (and other barriers) to encourage tourism and restore
mobility of wildlife over larger landscapes
• High expectations for tourism development and wealth generation on the part of governments, parks agencies and TFCA residents
But, serious wildlife, livestock and associated human and resource use issues remain to be
addressed across national and land use boundaries
Context
Context
3. Animal health and humans
• Major Wildlife and Livestock diseases & related human health issues
Wildlife Livestock Human related
**BTb **FMD* **BTb
Anthrax Theileriosis Anthrax
Rabies MCF, BTb, ASF Rabies
RVF Anthrax, Brucella Echinococcus
(?Distemper) **Ngana (Tryps) Neospora/Toxo
RVF RVF
* Zw now has a strain of FMD not formerly present in the TFCA** Priorities (??) for surveillance and strategic control/containment
4. Ecosystem services, animal health & human wellbeing• Water, Grazing, timber, fruits, firewood etc.
• Inappropriate land uses (e.g. dry land cropping)
• Scale mismatches between ecosystem processes and economic enterprises
• Conflicting policies driving sectoral interests
• Water – a key resource but from outside the TFCA
Context
TRENDS?
Land degradation
Food insecurity and malnutrition (people & livestock)
Increased susceptibility to zoonoses
Increased pressure on natural resources
Poverty traps and social unrest
Problems and Opportunities • The TFCAThe TFCA concept envisages the creation of larger
landscapes made up of diverse but complimentary land uses that promote conservation and human welfare.
Is this a problem or an opportunity?
• We don’t know the answer because we have not previously attempted to manage such large landscapes in an integrated
manner.
• International policy and agreements have been based on optimistic conservation and tourism scenarios
• Consequences (both + & -) for the remaining landuse sectors and actors have been largely ignored – something that could undermine the sustainability of TFCAs.
• Animal health interventions that work at local scales may not do so over large landscapes
• Increasing animal health problems?
Problems and Opportunities
Are existing Command & Control approaches to managing animal
health in confined landuse units applicable to large landscapes?
Mgmt. alternatives
Mgmt plan
Implementation
Mgmt. failure
The “Backloop”
Collapse?
Creative destruction?
Innovation
Problems and Opportunities
Increase scale & diversity
Scale land uses to savanna process scales
Match socio-economic enterprise scales and ecological process
scales
Increase adaptive capacity and resilience of ecological & social
systems IRC presentations (2003): du Toit & Fritz; Cumming & Slotow
Ecological insights on extensive rangeland systems indicate that we should :
Assumptions and Approaches
1. Pilanesburg Resolution
2. Dealing with a TFCA not only the TFNP
3. Management practices need to match scale
4. Scaling up will result in trade offs
5. Command and Control inappropriate
6. Strong participatory approach
7. Healthy mix of scientific approaches
8. Common understanding needed
9. Communication - costly but essential
Assumptions and Approaches
Scientific approaches?
Employ a healthy mix of appropriate scientific approaches,
paradigms and methodologies
a. Normal science (hypothetico-deductive, reductionist)
b. Integrative science (consilient, inductive, holistic)
c. Post normal science (dealing with uncertainty)
Assumptions and Approaches Scientific & Management approaches
System Uncertainty
Dec
isio
n S
take
s
High
HighLow
Normal
Consultancy
Post normal
Applied Science
(Funtowicz & Ravetz 1991)
AdaptiveManagement
OptimalControl
Hedging
ScenarioPlanning
ControllabilityUncontrollableControllable
High
LowUn
cert
ain
ty
Management
(Peterson et al 2003)
Objective:Objective: Contribute, through innovative and integrated inter-disciplinary research ……. to improving animal and ecosystem health, and human wellbeing in the TFCAs in the GLTFCA (and SADC Region ?)
ThemesThemes::
1. Overarching conceptual framework
2. Animal health and diseases
3. Land use, ecosystem goods and services, and animal health
4. Human livelihoods and animal and ecosystem integrity/processes
5. Policy support and protocols on Animal Health
6. Communications and outreach
Overall Objectives & Themes
Theme #1: Theme #1: Overarching conceptual framework
To provide:
1. Common interdisciplinary understanding of linkages and interaction between the major components of interest (i.e. animal & ecosystem health and human wellbeing)
2. Building a common understanding amongst participants
3. Basis for participatory interaction between researchers and resource managers and spreading knowledge between resource managers
4. Defining core projects
Themes and Modules
Alternative? A disparate set of projects that are unlikely to gel or result in clear policy support
Theme #2: Theme #2: Animal health and diseases
Modules:
1. Epidemiological studies of key wildlife & livestock diseases
• Surveillance, monitoring and spatially explicit epid. models
2. Alternative strategies animal health & disease control
• Biological, social and economic implications
3. Theoretical studies
• Anthropogenic interventions on host parasite population dynamics
• Effects of interventions/disturbances on virulence, enzootic stability, competitive displacement of pathogenic strains
• Influence of landscape scale – host population sizes and dispersion and movements on host/parasite dynamics
Themes and Modules
Theme #3: Theme #3: Land use, ecosystem goods & services, and animal health
Modules:
a. Spatial relationships between ecosystem health and
disease
b. Animal impacts on ecosystem goods & services
c. Scale and pattern of land use & their impact on animal
health
d. Linkages between animal and human health
e. Animal husbandry practices, disease and predators
Themes and Modules
Theme #4: Theme #4: Human livelihoods and animal health & ecosystem goods and services
Modules:
a. Scenarios to explore alternative futures for land use &
development
b. Economic, social & ecological trade offs of alternative
patterns and scales of landuse.
c. Policy and institutional effects on alternative scenarios
d. Baseline indicators of wellbeing (ecosystems, animals,
humans)
Themes and Modules
Theme # 5Theme # 5 Animal Health policy and protocols
• Facilitate and provide support to local, national and regional (and SADC?) needs in the development of policy related to animal health and the linkages between animal health and human and ecosystem health
• Explore likely consequences of alternative policies using scenarios and related approaches
Themes and Modules
Theme # 6: Theme # 6: Communications and Outreach
Themes and Modules
Conceptual Framework
Animal Health & Disease
Land Use &Ecosystem Services
HumanLivelihoods
• Within the program between modules and projects
Theme # 6: Theme # 6: Communications and Outreach
ConceptualFramework
AH&D
LU & GS
H L
NGOs
Resource Managers & Communities
DONORS
Universities
WCS, WWF,CESVI, PPF,FNP
UP, UN, UZ, EMU, UCB
Govt.
Vet. ServicesAgriculture
Local Govt.Planning
Parks & WL
TFNP-JMB
Committees
Themes and Modules
• Between the program, resource managers and agencies
Theme # 6: Theme # 6: Communications and Outreach
ConceptualFramework
AH&D
LU & GS
H L
Govt.
Vet. ServicesAgriculture
Local Govt.Planning
Parks & WL
SADC
Themes and Modules
• Between the program, consortium and SADC
AHEAD-GLTFCAConsortium/Partnerships
Coordination
Mozambique:• University Eduardo Mondlane• Veterinary Services• Dept. National Parks & Tourism
South Africa: • SANParks, • University of Pretoria, University of Kwazulu-Natal • Dept. Veterinary Services• PPF
Zimbabwe:• Zimbabwe Veterinary Services, NPWMA• University of Zimbabwe - TREP
International: • Wildlife Conservation Society• WWF-SARPO, AWF
Collaborative Partnership or Consortium – Still to be formed
Coordination ?
NGOs: NGOs:
• Peace Parks Foundation
• CESVI regional CBNRM project
• SELCORE Programme & Resilience in SE Lowveld of Zw.
• WWF Rhino Conservancies
• Sand County Foundation - landholder monitoring
• FNP – support to Zinave & Banhine
• AWF – Heartlands program
• Co-management programmes e.g. Makuleke
• Several Universities in the region and elsewhere
Existing initiatives – Existing initiatives – building synergies & avoiding overlapbuilding synergies & avoiding overlap
Project Budgets
GLTFP Programme GLTFP Programme
• Approximately $10 million per annum
Policy & Protocol support Policy & Protocol support
• Approximately $2 million per annum