susan gal 1. introduction - linguistic society of …...susan gal 1. introduction the historic...

38
BETWEENSPEECH AND SILENCE: The problematics of research on language and genderl Susan Gal 1. Introduction The historic silence of women in public life, and womenrs atternpts to gain a voice in politics and literature, have been major themes of recent feminist scholarship. It has become clear that gender relations are created not only by a sexual division of labor and a set of symbolic images, but also through different patterns of speaking and contrasting possibilities of expression for men and women. Feminists have explicitly written about scholarship's responsibl ity to rrhear womenr s wordsrr and have rightly argued the theoretical importance of rrrediscoverIing] womenrs voices'r (Srnith-Rosenberg 1985: 11, 26) . fn these writings, silence is generally deplored, because it is taken to be a result and a syrnbol of passivity and powerlessness: Those who are denied speech cannot make their experience known and thus cannot influence the course of their lives or of history.2 fn a telling contrast, other scholars have emphasized the paradoxical power of silence, especially in certain institutional settings. In religious confession, modern psychotherapy, bureaucratic interviews and in police interrogation, the relations of coercion are reversed: Where self-exposure is required, it is the silent listener who judges, and who thereby exerts power over the one who speaks (Foucault 97826I-62). Similarly, silence in American households is often a weapon of masculine power (Sattel 1983). But silence can also be a strategic defense against the powerful, as when Western Apache men use it to baffle, disconcert and exclude white outsiders (Basso ),979). And this does not exhaust the meanings of silence. For the English Quakers of the 17th century, both men and women, the refusal to speak when others expected them to marked an ideological commitment. It was the opposite of. passivity, indeed a form of political protest (Bauman 1983).r The juxtaposition of these different constructions of silence hiqhlights the three issues I would like to raise in this paper. First, and most generally, the example of silence suggests a cl-ose Iink between gender, the use of speech (or silence) and the exercise of power. But it also r IPrA Papers in Pragmatics 3, l{o. f (lgi;o)" l-38 f.T t !' f,

Upload: others

Post on 29-Jun-2020

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Susan Gal 1. Introduction - Linguistic Society of …...Susan Gal 1. Introduction The historic silence of women in public life, and womenrs atternpts to gain a voice in politics and

BETWEEN SPEECH AND S ILENCE:The p rob lema t i cs o f r esea rch on l anguage and gende r l

S u s a n G a l

1 . I n t r o d u c t i o n

T h e h i s t o r i c s i l e n c e o f w o m e n i n p u b l i c l i f e , a n dwomenrs a t t e rnp t s t o ga in a vo i ce i n po l i t i c s and l i t e ra tu re ,have been ma jo r t hemes o f r ecen t f em in i s t scho la r sh ip . I thas become c lea r t ha t gende r re l a t i ons a re c rea ted no t on l yb y a s e x u a l d i v i s i o n o f l a b o r a n d a s e t o f s y m b o l i c i m a g e s ,b u t a l s o t h r o u g h d i f f e r e n t p a t t e r n s o f s p e a k i n g a n dc o n t r a s t i n g p o s s i b i l i t i e s o f e x p r e s s i o n f o r m e n a n d w o m e n .F e m i n i s t s h a v e e x p l i c i t l y w r i t t e n a b o u t s c h o l a r s h i p ' srespons ib l i t y t o r r hea r womenr s wo rds r r and have r i gh t l ya r g u e d t h e t h e o r e t i c a l i m p o r t a n c e o f r r r e d i s c o v e r I i n g ] w o m e n r sv o i c e s ' r ( S r n i t h - R o s e n b e r g 1 9 8 5 : 1 1 , 2 6 ) .

f n t h e s e w r i t i n g s , s i l e n c e i s g e n e r a l l y d e p l o r e d ,because i t i s t aken t o be a resu l t and a sy rnbo l o f pass i v i t yand power l essness : Those who a re den ied speech canno t makethe i r expe r i ence known and t hus canno t i n f l uence t he cou rseo f t h e i r l i v e s o r o f h i s t o r y . 2 f n a t e l l i n g c o n t r a s t ,o the r scho la r s have emphas i zed t he pa radox i ca l power o fs i l e n c e , e s p e c i a l l y i n c e r t a i n i n s t i t u t i o n a l s e t t i n g s . I nre l i g i ous con fess ion , mode rn psycho the rapy , bu reauc ra t i ci n te r v i ews and i n po l i ce i n te r roga t i on , t he re l a t i ons o fcoe rc i on a re reve rsed : Where se l f - exposu re i s r equ i red , i t i st he s i l en t l i s t ene r who j udges , and who the reby exe r t s powero v e r t h e o n e w h o s p e a k s ( F o u c a u l t 9 7 8 2 6 I - 6 2 ) . S i m i l a r l y ,s i l ence i n Amer i can househo lds i s o f t en a weapon o f mascu l i nep o w e r ( S a t t e l 1 9 8 3 ) . B u t s i l e n c e c a n a l s o b e a s t r a t e g i cde fense aga ins t t he power fu l , as when Wes te rn Apache men usei t t o b a f f l e , d i s c o n c e r t a n d e x c l u d e w h i t e o u t s i d e r s ( B a s s o) , 9 7 9 ) . A n d t h i s d o e s n o t e x h a u s t t h e m e a n i n g s o f s i l e n c e . F o rthe Eng l i sh Quake rs o f t he 17 th cen tu ry , bo th men and women ,the re fusa l to speak when others expected them to marked anideo log i ca l commi tmen t . I t was t he oppos i t e o f . pass i v i t y ,i n d e e d a f o r m o f p o l i t i c a l p r o t e s t ( B a u m a n 1 9 8 3 ) . r

T h e j u x t a p o s i t i o n o f t h e s e d i f f e r e n t c o n s t r u c t i o n s o fs i l e n c e h i q h l i g h t s t h e t h r e e i s s u e s I w o u l d l i k e t o r a i s e i nt h i s p a p e r . F i r s t , a n d m o s t g e n e r a l l y , t h e e x a m p l e o fs i l e n c e s u g g e s t s a c l - o s e I i n k b e t w e e n g e n d e r , t h e u s e o fs p e e c h ( o r s i l e n c e ) a n d t h e e x e r c i s e o f p o w e r . B u t i t a l s o

r

I P r A P a p e r s i n P r a g m a t i c s 3 , l { o . f ( l g i ; o ) " l - 3 8

f . Tt ! 'f,

Page 2: Susan Gal 1. Introduction - Linguistic Society of …...Susan Gal 1. Introduction The historic silence of women in public life, and womenrs atternpts to gain a voice in politics and

L

s h o w s t h a t t h e l i n k i s n o t d i r e c t . O n t h e c o n t r a r y , i ta p p e a r s t h a t s i l e n c e , I i k e a n y l i n g u i s t i c f o r m , g a i n sd i f f e r e n t m e a n i n g s a n d h a s d i f f e r e n t m a t e r i a l e f f e c t s w i t h i ns p e c i f i c i n s t i t u t i o n a l a n d c u l t u r a l c o n t e x t s . S i l e n c e a n di n a r t i c u l a t e n e s s a r e n o t , i n t h e m s e l v e s , n e c e s s a r i l y s i g n s o fp o w e r l e s s n e s s . I n d e e d , m y f i r s t g o a l i s t o d r a w o n at rad i t i on o f cu l t u ra l ana l ys i s t o show how the l i nks be tweenl i n g u i s t i c p r a c t i c e s , p o w e r , a n d g e n d e r a r e t h e m s e l v e sc u l t u r a l l y c o n s t r u c t e d .

Ye t t hese cu l t u ra l cons t ruc t i ons a re no t a lways s tab le ,no r pass i ve l y accep ted and rep roduced by speake rs . Thee x a m p l e s o f s i l e n c e a s s u b v e r s i v e d e f e n s e a n d e v e n p o i i t i c a lp r c t e s t s u g g e s t t h a t l i n g u i s t i c f o r n s , e v e n t h e m o s ta p p a r e n t l y g u i e s c e n t , a r e s t r a t e g i c a c t i o n s , c r e a t e d a sresponses t o cu l t u ra l and i ns t i t u t i ona l - con tex t s (Gumperz1 - 9 8 2 ) . A l t h o u g h s o c i o l i n g u i s t i c s t u d i e s h a v e I o n g n o t e dd i f f e r e n c e s b e t w e e n m e n r s a n d w o m e n r s e v e r y d a y l i n g u i s t i cf o rms , much ea r l y r esea rch cons ide red t a l k t o be s imp l y anindex o f i den t i t y : me re l y one o f t he many behav iou rs l ea rnedt h r o u g h s o c i a l i z a t i o n t h a t f o r m e d p a r t o f m e n r s a n d w o m e n r sd i f f e r e n t s o c i a l r o l e s . R e c e n t r e c o n c e p t u a l i z a t i o n s o fgende r re j ec t t h i s imp l i c i t r o l e t heo ry and p rom ise a deepe runde rs tand ing o f t he genes i s and pe rs i s tence o f gende rd i f f e rences i n speech . They a rgue t ha t gende r i s be t t e r seenas a sys tem o f cu l t u ra l l y cons t ruc ted re l a t i ons o f power ,produced ar ld reproduced in in teract ion between and among menand women ' r . I d raw on soc io l i ngu i s t i c s tud ies o f eve rydayta l -k to prov ide ev idence that i t is in par t through verba lp rac t i ces i n soc ia l i n te rac t i on t ha t t he s t ruc tu ra l r e l a t i onso f gende r and dom inance a re pe rpe tua ted , and some t imessubve r ted : I n soc ia l i ns t i t u t i ons such as schoo l s , cou r t sa n d p o l i t i c a l a s s e m b l i e s , t a l k i s o f t e n u s e d t o j u d g e , d e f i n eand l eg i t i r na te speake rs . Thus , sma l l i n t e rac t i ona l sk i rm isheshave s t r i k i ng ma te r i a l consequences . My second goa l i s t oshow how ve rba l i n te rac t i on , wha teve r e l se i t accomp l i shes ,i s o f t en t he s i t e o f s t r ugg le abou t gende r de f i n i t i ons andpower ; i t conce rns who can speak whe re abou t wha t .

F i n a l l y , s u c h s t r u g g l e s a b o u t g a i n i n g a v o i c e , a n d m ye a r l - i e r e x a r n p l e o f w o m e n r s s i l e n c e i n p u b l i c 1 i f e , d r a wa t ten t i on t o a cu r ren t l y w idesp read and i n f l uen t i a l r ne tapho ri n bo th f em in i s t and non - fem in i s t soc ia l sc i ence . Te rms suchas r rwomenrs l anguage t t t t vo i ce r r o r r rwo rds r r a re r cu t i ne l y usedno t on l y t o des igna te eve ryday t a l k bu t a l so , much moreb r o a d l y , t h e p u b l i c e x p r e s s i o n o f a p a r t i c u l a r p e r s p e c t i v e o ns e f f a n d s o c i a l - l i f e , t h e e f f o r t t o r e p r e s e n t o n e r s o w ne x p e r i e n c e , r a t h e r t h a n a c c e p t i n g t h e r e p r e s e n t a t i o n s o f m o r ep c w e r f u l o t h e r s .

I

A n d s i m i l a r l y , t ' s i l e n c e r r a n d I t m u t e d n e s s r l

Page 3: Susan Gal 1. Introduction - Linguistic Society of …...Susan Gal 1. Introduction The historic silence of women in public life, and womenrs atternpts to gain a voice in politics and

[ "

)

( A r d e n e r , E . 1 9 7 5 ) a r e u s e d n o t o n r y i n t h e i r o r d i n a r y s e n s eo f a n i n a b i l i t y o r r e L u c t a n c e t o c r e a t e u t t e r a n l e s i nc o n v e r s a t i o n a l e x c h a n g € , b u t r e f e r a s w e f l t o t h e f a i l u r e t op r o d u c e o n e ' s o w n s e p a r a t e , s o c i a r l y s i g n i f i c a n t d i s c o u r s e .I t i s i n t h i s b r o a d e r s e n s e t h a t i e m i n i s t h i s t o r i a n s h a v ered i scove red womenrs wo rds . He re , .wo rd r becomes a synecdochef o r ! r c o n s c i o u s n e s s . r l

Ye t , desp i t e t h i s me tapho r i ca l l i nk , eve ryday t a l k andthe b roade r no t i on o f a gende red consc iousness have on ryra re l y been i nves t i ga ted t oge the r , o r by t he same scho la rs .S tud ies o f gende r d i f f e rences i n eve ryday t a l k have t ended tofocus on t he f o rma l p rope r t i es o f speech i n tona t i ona r ,p h o n o l o g i c a l , s y n t a c t i c a n d p r a g m a t i c a i f f e r e n c e s b e t w e e n m e nand women , and t he i ns t i t u t i ona l and i n te rac t i ona l con tex t si n w h i c h t h e y o c c u r . I n c o n t r a s t , s t u d i e s o f r r w o m e n t s v o i c e r thave f ocused more on va lues and be l i e f s : whe the r o r no t womenhave d i f f e ren t cu r tu ra l concep t i ons o r symbor i c sys temsc o n c e r n i n g s e l f , m o r a l i t g o r s o c i a l r e a l i t y , t h a n t h o s e o ft he dom inan t d i scou rse . 5 Tha t t he two a re i nex t r i cab l yI i nked becomes ev iden t when we v i ew bo th k i nds o f r esea rch ass tud ies o f symbo l i c do rn ina t i on .

As my d i scuss ion o f t he cu l t u ra l l y de f i ned l i nks be tweenspeech and power w i r r show , some l i ngu i s t i c s t r a teg ies andgenres are more h iqh ly va lued and carry more author i ty thano the rs . r n a c rass i c case o f symbo l i c don ina t i on , even t hosewho do no t con t ro l t hen cons ide r t hen more c red ib l - e o rpe rsuas i ve (Bou rd ieu r977b ) . A rche typa l exampres i nc rudestandard languages and r i tua l speech. But these respectedr i ngu i s t i c p rac t i ces a re no t s i np ry f o rms ; t hey aL r i ve rcha rac te r i s t i c cu l t u ra r de f i n i t i ons o f soc ia l l i t e wh i ch ,embod ied i n d i v i s i ons o f l abo r and t he s t ruc tu re o fi ns t i t u t i ons , se rve t he i n te res t s o f some g roups be t t e r t hano the rs . r ndeed , i t i s i n pa r t t h rough such r i ngu i s t i cp rac t i ces t ha t speake rs w i t h i n i ns t i t u t i ons impose on o the rst h e i r g r o u p ' s d e f i n i t i o n o f e v e n t s , p e o p l e a n d a c t i o n s . T h i sab i l i t y t o make o the rs accep t and enac t one rs rep resen ta t i ono f t he wo r rd i s ano the r aspec t o f sy rnbo l i c dom ina t i on . Bu tsuch cu l t u ra l power ra re l y goes uncon tes ted . Res i s tance t o adonr inant cur tura l order occurs when devalued l ingu is t ics t ra teg ies and gen res a re p rac t i ced and ce leb ra ted desp i t ew idesp read den ig ra t i on ; i t occu rs as we l -1 when these deva luedp rac t i ces p ropose o r embody a l t e rna te mode l s o f t he soc ia lwo r l d .

s e v e r a l i n f l u e n t i a l s o c i a r t h e o r i e s t h a t d i f f e rinportantry in other respects have in one way or anotherar t i cu la ted th is ins igh t . whether we use Gramsc i rs te rm

I

Page 4: Susan Gal 1. Introduction - Linguistic Society of …...Susan Gal 1. Introduction The historic silence of women in public life, and womenrs atternpts to gain a voice in politics and

4

c u l t u r a l h e g e m o n y , o r s y m b o l i c d o m i n a t i o n ( B o u r d i e u I 9 7 7 a ) ,o p p o s i t i o n a l , e m e r g e n t a n d r e s i d u a l c u L t u r e s ( w i l 1 i a m s 1 - 9 7 3 ) |o r s u b j u g a t e d k n o w l e d g e s ( F o u c a u l t 1 9 8 0 ) , t h e c e n t r a l n o t i o nr e m a i n s : T h e c o n t r o l o f d i s c o u r s e o r o f r e p r e s e n t a t i o n s o fr e a l i t y o c c u r s i n s o c i a f i n t e r a c t i o n , l o c a t e d i ni n s t i t u t i o n s , a n d i s a s o u r c e o f s o c i a l p o w e r ; i t m a y b " ,t h e r e f o r e , t h e o c c a s i o n f o r c o e r c i o n , c o n f l i c t o r c o m p l i c i t y . b

M i s s i n g f r o m t h e s e t h e o r i e s i s a c o n c e p t o f g e n d e r a s as t r u c t u r e o f s o c i a l r e l a t i o n s ( s e p a r a t e f r o m c l a s s o re t h n i c i t y ) , r e p r o d u c e d b u t a l s o c h a l l e n g e d i n e v e r y d a yp r a c t i c e . T h e s e t h e o r i e s n e i t h e r n o t i c e n o r e x p l a i n t h es u b t l e t y , s u b v e r s i o n a n d o p p o s i t i o n t o d o m i n a n t d e f i n i t i o n stha t f e rn in i s t s have d i scove red i n many womenrs gen res , ands o m e t i m e s e m b e d d e d i n w o m e n r s e v e r y d a y t a l k . f n d e e d , e v e n t h ea u t h o r i t y o f s o m e ( m a I e ) l i n q u i s t i c f o r m s a n d t h e i r d o m i n a n c eo f s o c i a l i n s t i t u t i o n s s u c h a s m e d i c i n e , o r p o l i t i c a lp r o c e s s , r e m a i n s m y s t e r i o u s w i t h o u t a t h e o r y o f g e n d e r .

T h i s i n t e r a c t i o n o f g e n d e r a n d d i s c o u r s e h a s b e e ne x p l o r e d b y r e c e n t f e m i n i s t a n a l y s e s i n l i t e r a t u r e a n dan th ropo logy ; some have sugges ted t ha t womenrs r r vo i ces r l

o f t en d i f f e r s i gn i f i c . an t l y i n f o rm as we l I as con ten t f r omdominan t d i scou rse . i The impo r tance o f i n teg ra t i ng t hes tudy o f eve ryday t a l k w i t h t he s tudy o f r rwomenrs vo i ce ' lb e c o m e s a p p a r e n t : T h e a t t e n t i o n t o t h e d e t a i l s o f l i n g u i s t i cf o rm and con tex t t yp i ca l o f r esea rch i n to eve ryday t a l k i si n d i s p e n s a b l e i n o r d e r t o g a i n a c c e s s t o w o m e n r s o f t e n v e i l e dgen res and mu ted r rwo rds ' r . And bo th k i nds o f s tud ies mus ta t t end no t on l y t o wo rds bu t t o t he i n te rac t i ona l p rac t i cesa n d t h e b r o a d e r p o l i t i c a l a n d e c o n o m i c c o n t e x t o fcommun ica t i on i n o rde r t o unde rs tand t he p rocess by wh i chwomenrs vo i ces - - i n bo th senses - -a re rou t i ne l y supp ressed ,o r nanage to emerge . My f i na l a im i s t o show tha t , i f weunde rs tand womenrs eve ryday t a l k and l i ngu i s t i c gen res asfo rms o f r es i s tance , we hea r , i n any cu l t u re , no t so much ac Iea r , au tonomous and he re to f o re neg lec ted r rwoman I s vo i ce , r l

o r sepa ra te cu l t u re , bu t more amb iguous , o f t en con t rad i c to r yl i n g u i s t i c p r a c t i c e s , d i f f e r i n g a m o n g s / o m e n o f d i f f e r e n tc l asses and e thn i c g roups and rang ing f r om accomoda t i on t oo p p o s i t i o n , s u b v e r s i o n , r e j e c t i o n o r r e c o n s t r u c t i o n o fr e i g n i n g c u l t u r a l d e f i n i t i o n s .

Thus , my theme i s t he l i nk be tween gende r , speech andpower , and t he ways t h i s can be concep tua l i zed on t he bas i sc f r ecen t emp i r i ca l r esea rch . I w i I l f i r s t exp lo re wha tcoun ts , c ross -cu l t u ra l I y , ds power fu l speech ; t hen show theC i f f e r e n t i a l p o w e r o f m e n r s a n d w o m e n r s l i n g u i s t i c s t r a t e g i e si n s o c i a l i n s t i t u t i o n s ; a n d f i n a l l y r e i n t e r p r e t w o m e n r ss t ra teg ies and l i ngu i s t i c gen res as f o rms o f r es i s tance t o

I

Page 5: Susan Gal 1. Introduction - Linguistic Society of …...Susan Gal 1. Introduction The historic silence of women in public life, and womenrs atternpts to gain a voice in politics and

ts

symbo l - i c dom ina t i on .

C u l t u r a l C o n s t r u c t i o n s

Many cu l t u res pos i t a c l ose connec t i on be tween the useo f l a n g u a g e a n d t h e e m e r g e n c e o f t h e s e l f . T h i s i s w e l li l l u s t ra ted by t he Laym i f nd ians o f H igh land Bo I i v i a , a g roupo f se t t l ed peasan ts engaged i n subs i s tence ag r i cu l t u re . Theyr e p r e s e n t a n e w - b o r n i n d i v i d u a l r s p r o g r e s s i o n t o a f u l l ys o c i a l i z e d h u m a n i n t e r m s o f t h e c h i l d t s r e L a t i o n t oIanguage : a baby becomes a ch i l d when i t s t a r t s t o say wo rds ;t he passage f r o rn ch i l dhood to young adu l t hood i s sa id t ooccu r when the i nd i v i dua l can speak and unde rs tand f u I l y( H a r r i s : 1 9 8 O 2 7 2 ) . S o m e c u l t u r a l c o n c e p t i o n s w h i c h I i n k p e r s o nand l anguage appea r no t t o be f ocussed on gende r a t a IL . Fo ri n s t a n c e , t h e m e t a l i n g u i s t i c d i s c o u r s e o f t h e K a I u I i i n N e wG u i n e a c l a s s i f i e s s p e a k e r s l a r g e l y o n t h e b a s i s o f c l a n o rv i l l a g e o r i g i n ( S c h i e f f e l i n 1 9 8 7 ) . S i m i l a r l y , i n S a r n o a r a n kseems much more impor tant in ideas about speech than gender( O c h s 1 9 8 7 ) . N e v e r t h e l e s s , t h e r e a r e m a n y c a s e s i n w h i c h n o tj u s t p e r s o n h o o d , b u t g e n d e r a s w e l l a r e c o n c e p t u a l i z e d i nt e r m s o f l a n g u a g e . S u c h c o n c e p t u a l i z a t i o n s d e f i n e t h es y m b o l i c s i g n i f i c a n c e o f m e n r s a n d w o m e n r s s p e e c h f e a t u r e s :wha t i s power fu l and weak , beau t i f u l o r exec rab le , mascuL inea n d f e m i n i n e , i n t h e r e a l m o f t a l k . M e n r s a n d w o m e n r sI i ngu i s t i c p rac t i ces a re p ro found l y shaped by such cu l t u ra li r nages . o

P e r h a p s t h e b e s t e x a m p l e i s K e e n a n r s ( L 9 7 4 ) s t u d y o f t h eM a l a g a s y o f M a d a g a s c a r , w h o e x p l i c i t l y a s s o c i a t e d i f f e r e n ts t y l es o f t a l k w i t h men and women . Acco rd ing t o t he Ma lagasy ,men cha rac te r i s t i ca l l y use an i nd i rec t , o rna te and respec t f u ls t y l e t ha t avo ids con f ron ta t i on and d i sag reemen t w i t h o the rs ;women use a d i r ec t s t y l e o f speak ing assoc ia ted w i t hexc i t ab leness and ange r , t ha t i s seen as a sou rce o f con f l i c tand t h rea t i n i n te rpe rsona l r e l a t i ons . Women a re exc ludedf rom the ma jo r f o rma l gen re o f o ra to r y t ha t i s r equ i red f o rp a r t i c i p a t i o n i n p o l i t i c a l e v e n t s . A n d m e n a v o i d a s e r i e s o fspeech ac t i v i t i es t ha t women engage i n , such as accusa t i ons ,m a r k e t h a g g l i n g a n d g o s s i p . f m p o r t a n t l y , t h e s e d i f f e r e n c e sa re l i nked t o no t i ons abou t power . F i r s t , bo th men and womenc o n s i d e r n e n r s s p e e c h f a r s u p e r i o r . S e c o n d , i t i s w o m e n r sd i r e c t n e s s , d e f i n e d a s i n e p t , t h a t i s s a i d t o b a r t h e m f r o mp o l i t i c a l a u t h o r i t y a n d f r o m s p e a k i n g a t p o l i t i c a l m e e t i n g sw h e r e t h e e g a l i t a r i a n s o c i a l s y s t e m r e q u i r e s t h a t t h ee x i s t e n c e o f c o n f l i c t b e s k i l l f u l l y h i d d e n .

Y e t , c r o s s - c u l t u r a l e v i d e n c e i n d i c a t e s t h a t i n d i r e c t n e s si s n o t a l w a y s a s s o c i a t e d w i t h m a s c u l i n i t y , n o r c o n f r o n t a t i o n

r

Page 6: Susan Gal 1. Introduction - Linguistic Society of …...Susan Gal 1. Introduction The historic silence of women in public life, and womenrs atternpts to gain a voice in politics and

o

w i th women . The case o f Amer . r can gende r s te reo t ypes p rov idesan i n fo rma t i ve con t ras t . The cu l t u ra l eva lua t i on o f Amer i canm i d d l e c l a s s s p e e c h i s r e v e a l e d i n s t u d i e s o f m i d w e s t e r nt e e n a g e r s w h o t h i n k o f m e n r s s p e e c h a s t t a g g r e s s j . v e r lI t f o r c e f u l , t r t r b l u n t r t a n d r r a u t h o r i t a r i a n , r r w h i l e w o m e n r s s p e e c hi s c o n s i d e r e d t t g e n t l e r ' I ' t r i v i a l t ' r r c o r r e c t r r a n d " p o I i t e .

r l

On Iy ca re fu l emp i r i ca l r esea rch can documen t t he sub t l ed i f f e r e n c e s t h a t a c t u a l l y e x i s t b e t w e e n A m e r i c a n m e n r s a n dw o m e n r s s p e e c h , b u t t h e s e s t e r e o t y p e s p r o v i d e t h ee x p e c t a t i o n s a n d i d e a l s a g a i n s t w h i c h s p e a k e r s a r e r o u t i n e l yj u d g e d , ( K r a m a r a e 1 9 B 0 ) . f n d e e d , t h e r e j , s a n e n t i r eL i t e r a t u r e o f a d v i c e b o o k s , € t i q u e t t e m a n u a l s a n dp h i l o l o g i c a l a n d l i n g u i s t i c t r a c t s , p u b l i s h e d i n t h e U n i t e dS ta tes and Wes te rn Eu rope wh i ch have f o r seve ra l cen tu r i esc o n s t r u c t e d , w i t h o u t b e n e f i t o f e v i d e n c e , i m a g e s o f n a l e a n dfema le f r na tu res r r l i nked t o t he i r supposed speech pa t t e rns( K r a m a r a e 1 9 8 0 : 9 1 ) . 9

F r o m t h e e x a m p l e o f t h e M a l a g a s y a n d A m e r i c a ns te reo t ypes i t n i gh t appea r t ha t , whe the r b l un t o r i nd i r ec t ,ve rba l sk i l l - s o f some k ind a re assoc ia ted w i t h au tho r i t y andp o w e r . A c o n t r a s t t o b o t h i s p r o v i d e d b y I r v i n e r s ( I 9 7 9 )d e s c r i p t i o n o f t h e W o l o f o f S e n e g a l , w h o a r e o r g a n i z e d i n t o as t ra t i f i ed cas te sys te rn . H igh cas te nob les de r i ve t he i r powerf rom an i nhe r i t ed gua l i t y r nan i f es ted as a sense o f r ese rve i na l l a c t i v i t i e s . D i f f i d e n c e a n d i n a r t i c u l a t e n e s s a r e s o m u c h apa r t o f nob le demeano r , t ha t e l i t e men o f t en h i r e l ow s ta tusp ro fess iona l - o ra to r s t o speak f o r t hem in o rde r t o avo idshow ing ve rba l f l uency i n pub l i c . Thus , cu l t u ra l concep t i onsdemand tha t o rd ina ry men and women be more a r t i cu la te t hanmen w i t h h i gh s ta tus .

W h i l e i n a r t i c u l a t e n e s s i s a t r a i t t h a t i s a s i g n o f aW o l - o f m a n r s e l i t e i d e n t i t y , i t i s e x a c t l y i n a r t i c u l a t e n e s sw h i c h i s r e p r e s e n t e d a s w o m e n r s d e f i n i n g a n d d e b i l i t a t i n gcond i t i on i n r u ra l G reece . The image o f women i s no t un i t a r yi n Greece : t hey a re seen as bo th ga r ru lous and s i l en t . Bu t i nb o t h m o d e s w o m e n a r e c o n c e p t u a l i z e d a s i n c a p a b l e o fc o n t r o l l i n g t h e m s e l v e s a n d t h e r e f o r e o f a c h i e v i n g t h ea r t i c u l a t e a n d s w a g g e r i n g s e l f - d i s p l a y t h a t c o n s t i t u t e s t h ec u l t u r a l l y c o n s t r u c t e d i m a g e o f p o w e r f u l m e n ( H e r z f e l d 1 9 8 5 ) .

These examp les f r om d i spa ra te g roups p rov ide a use fu ldemons t ra t i on t ha t t he l i nks be tween gende r , power andl i n g u i s t i c p r a c t i c e s a r e n o t r r n a t u r a l r r a n d c a n b e c o n s t r u c t e di n q u i t e d i f f e r e n t w a y s . B u t t h e s e e x a m p l e s a r e s t a t i c , a n dseem to imp l y t ha t speake rs pass i ve l y f o l l ow abs tac t cu l t u ra ld i c t a t e s . A h i s t o r i c a l c a s e i s h e l p f u l t h e n , b e c a u s e i tcha r t s changes i n concep tua l i za t i ons , and shows how i dea l s

r

Page 7: Susan Gal 1. Introduction - Linguistic Society of …...Susan Gal 1. Introduction The historic silence of women in public life, and womenrs atternpts to gain a voice in politics and

r:t

7 l

c o m e t o r e s t r i c t w o m e n r s p o s s i b i f i t i e s o f e x p r e s s i o n .O u t r a m ( 1 9 8 7 ) c o n s i d e r s t h e d i l e m m a o f e l i t e w o m e n d u r i n g t h eF r e n c h R e v o l u t i o n . T h e d i s c o u r s e o f t h e F r e n c h R e v o l u t i o n ,g l o r i f y i n g m a l e r v e r t u r , i d e n t i f i e d t h e i n f l u e n c e o f w o m e nw i t h t h e s y s t e m o f p a t r o n a g e , s e x u a l f a v o r s , a n d c o r r u p t i o no f p o w e r u n d e r t h e O l d R e g i m e , i n w h i c h e l i t e w o m e n h a da c t i v e l y p a r t i c i p a t e d . T h e d i s c o u r s e o f t h e R e v o l u t i o n , i nd e l i b e r a t e c o n t r a s t , w a s c o m m i t t e d t o a n a n t i - f e m i n i n e l o g i c :p o l i t i c a l r e v o l u t i o n c o u l d o n l y t a k e p l a c e i f w o m e n a n d t h e i rco r rup t i ng i n f l uence we re exc luded f r om pub l i c speak ing andf rom the exe rc i se o f power . Ou t ra rn a rgues t ha t , i n pa r t as ar e s u l t o f t h i s n e w c o n c e p t u a l i z a t i o n , t h e f a m o u s a n d p o w e r f u lp o l i t i c a l p a r t i c i p a t i o n o f u p p e r c l a s s w o m e n i n t h e O I dR e g i m e w a s r e p l a c e d , i n t h e e r a o f t h e R e v o l u t i o n , w i t hv i g o r o u s a t t a c k s o n f e m a l e p o l i t i c a l a c t i v i s t s . B y t h e n e wl o g i c , e l i t e w o m e n r s p u b l i c s p e e c h a n d a c t i v i t i e s b r o u g h tt h e i r s e x u a l v i r t u e i n t o g u e s t i o n . F o r a w o m a n , t o b ep o l i t i c a l - w a s t o b e c o r r u p t ; t h e r e v o l u t i o n a r y d i s c o u r s e o fu n i v e r s a l e q u a l i t y a p p l i e d o n l y t o m e n . W o m e n w h o w a n t e d t ob e b o t h r e s p e c t a b l e a n d p o l i t i c a l h a d v e r y f e w c h o i c e s : O n eo f t he bes t - known f i gu res o f t he Revo lu t i on , who was l a te ri m p r i s o n e d f o r h e r p a r t i c i p a t i o n , p r o v i d e s a t e l l i n g e x a m p l e .M m e R o l a n d r s p o l i t i c a l a c t i v i t y i n c l u d e d p r o v i d i n g a f o r u m i nwh i ch men deba ted t he i ssues o f t he day . He r memo i res andle t t e r s revea l t ha t i t demanded a pa in fu l comprom ise : t h i swe l l - i n fo rmed woman re ta i ned respec t by l i s t en ing t o t hem e n r s p o l i t i c a J . d i s c u s s i o n s b u t r e m a i n i n g u t t e r l y s i l - e n t .

The h i s to r i ca l d imens ion i n ou t ramrs s tudy a l l ows us no ton l - y t o cha r t t he a f f ec t o f chang ing d i scou rse , bu t t ospec i f y t he soc ia l sou rce o f t he cu l t u ra l cons t ruc t i ons i n away no t poss ib l e i n t he more s ta t i c desc r i p t i ons o f non -W e s t e r n c a s e s . T h e s e p a r t i c u l a r c u l t u r a l d e f i n i t i o n s w e r e n o ts imp l y t he p roduc t o f some age -o Id and rnono l i t h i c ma led o n i n a n c e , b u t e m e r g e d a r t i c u L a t e l y i n t h e i d e a s o fr e v o l u t i o n a r y t h e o r i s t s a n d E n l i g h t e n m e n t p h i l o s o p h e r s .Pe rhaps o the r pa t t e rns o f i deas abou t gende r d i f f e rences i nspeech cou ld be t r aced t o s im i l a r l y spec i f i c t imes and soc ia lcon tex t s . Fo r examp le , i t i s a recu r ren t and unexp la inedf i nd ing o f r ecen t soc io l i ngu i s t i c su rveys t ha t i n no r thA m e r i c a n , B r i t i s h a n d s o m e o t h e r i n d u s t r i a l i z e d c i t i e s ,m i d d l e a n d w o r k i n g c l a s s w o m e n m o r e f r e q u e n t l y u s ephono log i ca l f o rms assoc ia ted w i t h t he h ighes t r ank ingsoc ioceonomic c l asses t han men o f t he i r c l ass . M idd Ie andw o r k i n g c l a s s m e n m o r e f r e q u e n t l y u s e p r o n u n c i a t i o n scha rac te r i s t i c o f t he wo rk ing c l ass t han t he i r f ema lecoun te rpa r t s . And a l I men eva lua te wo rk ing c l ass f ea tu resm o r e p o s i t i v e l y t h a n w o m e n d o ( e . 9 . L a b o v I 9 7 4 , T r u d g i l lL 9 8 3 ) . C l e a r l y t h e p h o n o l o g i c a l s y m b o l i z a t i o n o f g e n d e r a n d

I

Page 8: Susan Gal 1. Introduction - Linguistic Society of …...Susan Gal 1. Introduction The historic silence of women in public life, and womenrs atternpts to gain a voice in politics and

b

o f s o c i a l c l a s s a r e i n e x t r i c a b l y ] i n k e d . T h e u n i v e r s a l i z i n ge x p l a n a t i o n s o f f e r e d s o f a r c r e d i t w o m e n i n g e n e r a l w i t hg r e a t e r s e n s i t i v i t y t o l a n g u a g e a n d p r e s t i g e . B u t t h e s et h e o r i e s f o u n d e r o n c o u n t e r - e x a m p l e s f r o m o t h e r s o c i e t i e s .I n s t e a d , I s u g g e s t t h e s e f i n d i n g s g a i n m e a n i n g w i t h i n ab r o a d e r c u l t u r a l p a t t e r n . T h e I i n g u i s t i c e v i d e n c e f o r m s p a r to f a g e n e r a l s y m b o l i c s t r u c t u r e I i n k i n g m a n L i n e s s w i t hr r t o u g h r r w o r k i n g c l a s s c u l t u r e a n d f e m a l e n e s s w i t ht r r e s p e c t a b i l i t y , t t t r g e n t i l i t y r f a n d " h i g h c u l t u r e " t h a t , s o m ea n a l y s e s s u g g e s t , e m e r g e d o n b o t h s i d e s o f t h e A t l a n t i c i nthe Lg th cen tu ry and con t i nues t o be one componen t o f cu r ren tg e n d e r i m a g e s . 1 0

f n s h o r t , t h e c u l t u r a l l y c o n s t r u c t e d I i n k b e t w e e n t y p e so f v e r b a l s k i l 1 , g e n d e r i d e n t i t y a n d p o w e r i s n o t o n l yv a r i a b l e , b u t d e p e n d e n t o n a n e n t i r e w e b o f r e l a t e dc o n c e p t i o n s a n d , a s t h e f i n a l e x m a p l e s h i n t , o n h i s t o r i c a la n d p o l i t i c a l e c o n o m i c p r o c e s s e s a s w e I 1 .

3 . Power i n Eve ryday Ta l k

M m e R o I a n d ' s s i l e n c e w a s n e i t h e r n a t u r a l n o r a nau toma t i c acgu iescence t o Revo lu t i ona ry cu l t u ra l concep t i ons .I n s t e a d , h e r } e t t e r s a n d m e m o i r s a l I o w u s t o u n d e r s t a n d t h efo rums she c rea ted and he r pub l i c s i l - ence as s t ra teg i cresponses t o a cu l t u ra l doub le b i nd t ha t o f f e red he r e i t he rspeech o r r espec t , bu t no t bo th . Ne i t he r who l I y de te rm ined bycu l t u ra l i -mages and chang ing soc ia l s t r uc tu res , no r en t i r e l ya ma t te r o f he r own agency , Mme Ro land rs speech andi n t e r a c t i o n a r e e x c e l l e n t e x a m p l e s o f p r a c t i c e s t h a trep roduce gende r images and re l a t i ons oE , as l a te r examp lesw i l l s h o w , s o m e t i m e s t a c i t l y c r i t i c i z e a n d r e s i s t t h e m .

In te rac t i onaL soc io l i ngu i s t i c s p rov ides t he t oo l s f o rana l yz ing speech s t ra teg ies as p rac t i ces ac t i ve l y cons t ruc tedb y s p e a k e r s i n r e s p o n s e t o c u l t u r a l a n d s t r u c t u r a lcons t ra i n t s . I f speech enac t s a d i scou rse s t ra tegy and i s no ts i np l y a re f l ex o r s i gna l o f soc ia l i den t i t y , t hen a t t en t i onmust be pa id not on ly to the gender ident i ty o f the speakerbu t a l so t o t he gende r o f t he aud ience and t he va ry i ngcu l t u ra l sa l i ence o f gende r i n d i f f e ren t soc ia l - con tex t s .Ma Ie - fema le d i f f e rences i n speech have been found i n eve rysoc ie t y s tud ied ; bu t t he na tu re o f t he con t ras t s i ss tagge r i ng l y d i ve rse , occu r r i ng i n va ry i ng pa r t s o f t hel i ngu i s t i c sys ten : phono logy , p ragma t i cs , syn tax , r no rpho logya n d l e x i c o n ( s e e P h i l i p s l - 9 8 7 ) . H e r e I w i l l p a y s p e c i a la t t en t i on t o co -occu r r i ng f ea tu res o f speech wh i ch f o rmpa t te rns , ca l l ed s t y l es , gen res . - o r ways o f speak ing t ha t a rel i nked , i n some wdy , t o gende r . r r

I

Page 9: Susan Gal 1. Introduction - Linguistic Society of …...Susan Gal 1. Introduction The historic silence of women in public life, and womenrs atternpts to gain a voice in politics and

r . aII

L

9

U n I i k e t h e e a r l i e s t s t u d i e s t h a t n o t e d o n l y o b l i g a t o r yI i n g u i s t j . c d i f f e r e n c e s b e t w e e n m e n a n d w o m e n , c u r r e n tresea rch d i s t i ngu i shes be tween cases whe re a speech f o rm i sno rma t i ve l y r equ i red f o r men o r women , f r om cases whe re i t i sa f avo red s t ra tegy f o r one gende r because i t enac t s ,c o n s c i o u s l y o r n o t , m e n r s a n d w o m e n r s c o n t r a s t i n g v a l u e s o ri n t e r a c t i o n a l g o a l s , ( M c C o n n e l I - G i n e t 1 9 8 8 ) . S u c h d i f f e r e n c e sin va lues and goa l s emerge w i t h f o r ce when the d i v i s i on o fI abo r c rea tes l a rge l y sepa ra te wo r l ds f o r men and women , Sotha t r rmembers o f each sex l ea rn t o be p ro f i c i en t i n d i f f e ren tl i ngu i s t i c sk i l I s and t o do d i f f e ren t t h i ngs w i t h wo rds ,( B o r k e r 1 9 8 0 : 3 1 ) . r r I n d e e d , c o n s i d e r a b l e e t h n o g r a p h i cev idence sugges ts t ha t d i f f e rences i n ve rba l gen res be tweenmen and women a re w idesp read , espec ia l l y whe re menrs andw o n e n r s a c t i v i t i e s a r e d i s t i n c t l y d e f i n e d ( S h e r z e r 1 9 8 7 ) .

Fo r exa rnp le , among the Kuna fnd ians o f Low land Panama,speech gen res emerge f r om the d i v i s i on o f Labo r . Gen resassoc ia ted w i t h pub l i c po l i t i ca l mee t i ngs and r i t ua l - i zeda t t emp ts t o cu re i l - I ness a re l a rge l y res t r i c t ed t o men , wh i l ethe more p r i va te l y pe r fo rmed gen res o f l u I l ab ies and t une fu lm o u r n i n g a r e r e s t r i c t e d t o w o m e n ( S h e r z e r L 9 B 7 ) . S i n i l a r l y ,among the Ka lu l i , l i v i ng i n t he Sou the rn H igh lands o f PapuaNew Gu inea , i t i s t he men who te I I seve ra l t ypes o f s to r i es ,rec i te rnagica l formulae for hunt ing and per fonn songs anddances i n na jo r po l i t i ca l and ce remon ia l con tex t s . Womenc o n p o s e m o r e l i n i t e d c e r e m o n i a l s o n g s a n d e n g a g e i nexp ress i ve pub l i c weep ing on occas ions o f p ro found l - oss( S c h i e f f e l i n 1 9 8 7 ) . A m o n g t h e L a y m i I n d i a n s o f B o I i v i a ,women cont ro l and create genres o f pub l ic ly per formed songand mus i c t ha t a re essen t i a l t o cou r t i ng and t o t he r i t ua lcyc le ; men con t ro l speak ing i n t he 1oca1 po l i t i ca l assemb lyand speak ing d i r ec ted t o t he sp i r i t s i n cu r i ng r i t ua l s( H a r r i s 1 9 8 0 ) .

These s tud ies unde r l i ne t he f ac t t ha t i n many soc ie t i esw o m e n a c t i v e l y c r e a t e a n d p e r f o r m n a j o r e x p r e s s i v ea c t i v i t i e s , o f t e n i n p u b l i c , a p o i n t a l s o e r n p h a s i z e d b yf e m i n i s t f o l k l o r i s t s ( J o r d a n a n d d e C a r o L 9 B 6 ) . S u c h e v i d e n c ee f fec t i ve l y coun te rs t he pe rs i s ten t bu t e r roneous i n rage o fwomen as un i ve rsa l l y s i l en t i n pub l i c , o r r es t r i c t ed t odomes t i c ac t i v i t i es . I t h i gh l i gh t s as we l l one f unc t i on o fspeech i n a gende r sys tem: gen re d i f f e rences c rea te t he k i ndo f pe rvas i ve behav iou ra l con t ras t t ha t t r ans fo rms g rad ien t so f h u m a n d i f f e r e n c e i n t o c u l t u r a l l y s a l i e n t d i c h o t o m i e s o fr n a s c u l i n i t y a n d f e r n i n i n i t y . B u t , a s i m p l e c a t a l o g u e o f ' h i s

and he rs r gen res obscu res t he impo r tan t i ns i gh t t ha t womenrss p e c i a l v e r b a l s k i l l s a r e o f t e n s t r a t e g i c r e s p o n s e s - - m o r e o r

r

Page 10: Susan Gal 1. Introduction - Linguistic Society of …...Susan Gal 1. Introduction The historic silence of women in public life, and womenrs atternpts to gain a voice in politics and

l 0

I e s s s u c c e s s f u l - - t o p o s i t i o n s o f r e l a t i v e p o w e r l e s s n e s s .

F o r e x a m p l e , i r r a H u n g a r i a n - G e r m a n b i l i n g u a l t o w n i nA u s t r i a , w o m e n u s e G e r m a n m o r e t h a n m e n d o . W o m e n r s u s e o fGe rman co r responds t o t he i r gene ra l r e j ec t i on o f t he peasan tway o f L i f e assoc ia ted w i t h t he Hunga r i an l anguage and t he i raccep tance o f t he wage l abo r symbo l i zed by German . I t i s , i np a r t , w o m e n r s r e l a t i v e p o w e r l e s s n e s s i n t h e p e a s a n t s o c i a lo rde r t ha t makes t he escape to wo rke r s ta tus so a t t r ac t i ve

fg t - t h " I : . qqd t hus exp la i ns t he ve rba l s t r a teg ies t hey use

( G a l I 9 7 B ) . "

S t ra teg ies a re no t a lways d i r ec ted t oward change . I n aT e n e j a p a n v i l l a g e o f s o u t h e r n M e x i c o , w o m e n a r e m o r e p o l i t ethan men i n two ways . They use many more l i ngu i s t i c pa r t i c l est h a t e r n p h a s i z e s o l i d a r i t y w i t h t h e i r i n t e r a c t i o n a l p a r t n e r ,a n d a l s o u s e m o r e o f a c o n t r a s t i n g s e t o f p a r t i c l e s t h a ta v o i d i m p o s i t i o n a n d s t r e s s t h e l - i s t e n e r ' s s e p a r a t e n e s s a n dau tonomy . I ndeed , womenrs i n ten t t o i r npose by reques t i ng ,command ing o r c r i t i c i z i ng i s o f t en couched i n i r ony . Becausei r o n y r e g u i r e s t h e l i s t e n e r t o i n f e r t h e s p e a k e r r s i n t e n t , i ta l l ows t he speake r t o d i sc l a i r n t he i n ten t i f i t r esu l t s i ncha l l enge o r t h rea t . Men use l ess i r ony and f ewer pa r t i c l eso f e i t he r k i nd , show ing cons ide rab l y l ess sens i t i v i t y t o t hed e t a i l s o f s o c i a L r e l a t i o n s h i p s a n d c o n t e x t . W o m e n r s u s a g e i san i n te rac t i ona l s t r a tegy , an accomoda t i on a r i s i ng f r om the i rsoc ia l and even phys i ca l vu lne rab i l i t y t o men , and t heconsequen t necess i t y t o show de fe rence t o men on t he onehand , and ma in ta in s t rong ne two rks o f so l i da r i t y w i t h o the rwomen . Th i s sugges ts t ha t l eve l s and t ypes o f po l i t enesss t ra teg ies used by women to men and t o o the r women nay we l lbe a sens i t i ve measu re o f womenrs s t ruc tu ra l - power i n manys o c i e t i e s ( B r o w n 1 9 8 0 ) .

Bu t womenrs responses t o power ) -essness may a l so bea t t e m p t s t o s u b v e r t m a l e a u t h o r i t y , o n l y t o e n d b yr e p r o d u c i n g i t . A s t r i k i n g e x a m p l e i s H a r d i n g ' s ( L 9 7 4 )a n a l y s i s o f a p e a s a n t v i l l a g e i n S p a i n . W o m e n a n d m e nc h a r a c t e r i s t i c a l l y o c c u p y d i f f e r e n t p h y s i c a l s p a c e s ( t h eh o u s e a n d s h o p s v s . t h e p l a z a a n d t h e f i e l d s ) ; h a v ed i f f e r e n t w o r k a n d c o n c e r n s ( f a m i l y a n d n e i g h b o r s v s . I a n d ,p o l i t i c s , e c o n o m i c s ) ; a n d d i f f e r e n t s p e e c h g e n r e s . W h i t e m e na rgue i n pub l i c , as a f o rm o f ve rba l p l ay requ i r i ng ana p p r e c i a t i v e a u d i e n c e ; w o m e n t a l k i n s m a I l , c l o s e d g r o u p s o fk i - n , o f t e n p r a c t i c i n g ' r g o s s i p ' r - - t h e g a t h e r i n g a n d e v a l u a t i n go f i n f o r m a t i o n a b o u t p e o p l e - - a s t h e i r o n l y m e a n s o f s o c i a lc o n t r o l . H a r d i n g a r g u e s t h a t i t i s w o m e n r s s u b o r d i n a t ep o s i t i o n t o m e n , a n d n o t s i r n p l y s e p a r a t i o n , t h a t l e a d s w o m e nt o d e v e l o p s p e c i a l r f m a n i p u l a t i v e r r v e r b a l s k i I I s s u c h a s

I

Page 11: Susan Gal 1. Introduction - Linguistic Society of …...Susan Gal 1. Introduction The historic silence of women in public life, and womenrs atternpts to gain a voice in politics and

.T

l l

t e a s i n g o u t i n f o r m a t i o n , c a r e f u l l y w a t c h i n g o t h e r s s o a s t oa n t i c i p a t e t h e i r n e e d s , a n d u s i n g i r o n y o r s e l f - e f f a c i n gme thods o f pe rsuas ion . G o s s i p i t s e l f i s w o m e n r s m o s tpower fu l ve rba l - t oo l , , bu t i t i s two -edged . I t t ends t osubve r t ma le au tho r i t y , by j udg ing peop le i n t e rms o f va luesthe ma le -dom inan t sys tem re jec t s . Bu t pa r t l y as a resu l t o ft h i s subve rs ion i t i s condemned and dec r i ed by t he dom inan tcu l t u re . Moreove r , i t i s seen by a l l as a nega t i ve f o rm o fpower t ha t makes o r b reaks repu ta t i ons , causes con f l i c t andd i s r u p t s r e l a t i o n s h i p s . I t i s n e g a t i v e i n a n o t h e r s e n s e t o o .As Ha rd ing revea l s , women deve top t h i s gen re f o r l ack o fo the r f o rms o f power , bu t t hey a re t r apped by i t t hemse l ves :t t T h I e ] s e n s e , i f n o t f a c t , o f b e i n g u n d e r c o n s t a n t v e r b a lsu rve i l l ance res t r i c t s t he behav io r o f women and he lps keepthe rn i n t he i r p l ace , r r ( I 97 5 : 103 ) .

A l t hough the re i s no pa ra l l e l sepa ra t i on o f t he sexes i nthe Un i t ed S ta tes , Amer i can men and women a l so seem to usesomewha t d i f f e ren t ve rba l - s t r a teg ies i n conve rsa t i on . f n ap rovoca t i ve syn thes i s o f r ecen t r esea rch f i nd ings , Ma l t z andB o r k e r ( 1 9 8 2 ) a r g u e t h a t s e x - s e g r e g a t e d c h i l d r e n r s p t a yg roups , common i n Amer i can soc ie t y , c rea te gende r - spec i f i cv e r b a l c u l t u r e s w h o s e p r a c t i c e s s p e a k e r s r e t a i n i n t oadu l t hood . Bu t t he gende r d i f f e rences a re so sub t l e peop lea re aware on l y o f t he i r r esu l t : f r equen t m iscommun ica t i onbetween men and women who otherwise c la im to be f r iends ands ta tus egua l s . Ma l t z and Bo rke r r e l y i n pa r t on Goodw in t sca re fu l s t ud ies o f ch i l d ren ' s p l ay g roups i n an u rban b lackneighborhood, but in format ion on whi te ch i ldren and adul ts o fva r i ous c l asses and e thn i c g roups a l so seems to suppo r t t he i rg e n e r a l i z a t i o n s a b o u t m e n r s a n d w o m e n r s s t r a t e g i e s .

Fo r i ns tance , boys and men o rgan i ze i n to re l a t i ve l yIa rge h ie ra rch i ca l g roups , us ing d i r ec t commands and vy ingw i th each o the r f o r l eade rsh ip pos i t i ons by ho ld i ng f o r t h i nco rnpe t i t i ve ve rba l d i sp lay . S ide commen ts and cha l l enges a rethe proper responses by those who do not have the f loor .G i r l s , oD the o the r hand , p l ay i n sma l l e r g roups , f o rm inge x c l u s i v e c o a l i t i o n s . T h e r e i s p l e n t y o f c o n f l i c t i n a l I - g i r lg r o u p s , b u t t h e i r v e r b a l i n t e r a c t i o n s i m p l i c i t l y d e n ycon f l i c t and h ie ra rchy , ph ras ing commands as p roposa l s f o rf u tu re ac t i v i t y . G i r l s and women ca re fu l l y I i nk t he i ru t terances to the prev ious speakerrs cont r ibut ion and develope a c h o t h e r s t t o p i c s , a s k i n g q u e s t i o n s r a t h e r f o rconversat iona l rna in tenance than for in format ion or cha l - Ienge( e . 9 . G o o d w i n l - 9 8 0 ) . B u t t h e s e d i f f e r e n c e s a r e n o t a sinnocen t as Ma l t z and Bo rke r r s image o f pa ra l l e l , mu tua l l yn i scomprehend ing gende r - cu l t u res wou ld sugges t .

I

Page 12: Susan Gal 1. Introduction - Linguistic Society of …...Susan Gal 1. Introduction The historic silence of women in public life, and womenrs atternpts to gain a voice in politics and

L 2

O n e w a y o f i n t e r p r e t i n g t h e f e m a l e s t r a t e g i e s i s a s as e t o f p r a c t i c e s t h a t , w h e t e v e r t h e a c t u a l p o w e r r e l a t i o n sw i t h i n t h e g i r l s t o r w o m e n r s g r o u p , n e v e r t h e l e s s e n a c t v a l u e so f suppo r t and so l i da r i t y t ha t d i r ec t l y oppose and imp l i c i t l yc r i t i c i z e t h e b o y r s a n d m e n r s p r a c t i c e s o f h e r o i ci n d i v i d u a l i t y , c o m p e t i t i o n a n d t h e c e l e b r a t i o n o f h i e r a r c h y .I n t h i s s e n s e t h e t w o r c u l t u r e s t a r e n o t s e p a r a t e a t a I I , b u tde f i ned by each o the r , enac t i ng i n speech f o rms seve ra lf am i l i a r cu l t u ra l oppos i t i ons i n Amer i can d i scou rse abou tgende r . They a re a l so no t equa l i n power . Goodw in andGoodw in ' s ( 1987 ) mos t r ecen t r epo r t s i nd i ca te t ha t when boysand g i r l s a rgue t oge the r , t he boys r s t r a tegy i s emp loyed bya I I . Th i s sugges ts t ha t t he boys t s t r a tegy i s do rn inan t i n twosenses : t he g i r l s bu t no t t he boys mus t Lea rn bo th , and t heboys seem to be ab le t o impose the i r s on t he g i r l - s i n c ross -s e x i n t e r a c t i o n . T h i s k i n d o f d o m i n a n c e i s a l s o s u g g e s t e d b ya s e r i e s o f s t u d i e s o n p a t t e r n s o f i n t e r r u p t i o n i n c r o s s - s e xin te rac t i ons among s ta tus equa l s . Be tween pa i r s o f speake rswho knew each o the r we l l , ds we l l as be tween those t ha t we res t range rs , men i n te r rup ted women more t han e i t he r sexi n t e r r u p t e d i n s a m e - s e x i n t e r a c t i o n s . M o r e o v e r , t h eassu rnp t i on t ha t i n te r rup t i on i s a ges tu re o f dom inance i ssuppo r ted by t he f i nd ing t ha t adu l t s i n te r rup t ch i l d ren moret h a n t h e r e v e r s e ( W e s t a n d Z i m m e r m a n 1 9 8 3 ) t ' . A s t u d y o fna tu ra l l y occu r r i ng conve rsa t i on by young Amer i can mar r i edcoup les i n t he i r homes i s a l so sugges t i ve i n t h i s r ega rd .A l though the \domen ra ised a lmost tw ice as many top ics o fconve rsa t i on as t he men , t he t op i cs ra i sed by men we re t heones t ha t we re accep ted and e labo ra ted i n t he conve rsa t i on byboth men and women. Yet i t was the women who prov ided most o ft h e i n t e r a c t i o n a l r r w o r k r r l t he ques t i ons and n in i na lresponses ( r ruh-huhrr ) , that kept the conversat i -on go ing( F i s h n a n 1 9 7 8 ) .

More sys tema t i c ev idence i s needed , espec ia l l y abou t t hee f f ec t s o f soc ia l con tex t on t he de ta i l s o f eve ryday f r i end l yt a L k . 1 4 A n d w e n e e d r e p l i c a t i o n s a c r o s s c L a s s e s i n d e t h n i lg roups o f s tud ies re l y i ng on ve ry sma l l samp les o f wh i t em idd le - c l ass speake rs . Neve r the less , i n c ross -gende r t a l k , dsin t he c ross -e thn i c m iscommun ica t i on on wh i ch Ma l t z andBorke r mode l t he i r ana l ys i s (Gumperz 1 -982 ) , i t seems c lea rtha t t he d i f f e rences i n s t r a teg ies p rov ide an oppo r tun i t y f o rthe more power fu l group to enact and re in force i ts dominanceth rough the n i c rop rocesses o f ve rba l i n te rac t i on .

Bu t a rna jo r f l aw i n many o f t he s tud ies o f l i ngu i s t i cs t ra tegy I have d i scussed so f a r i s t he i r assump t i on t ha ts p e e c h a n d g e n d e r a r e b e s t i n v e s t i g a t e d i n i n f o r m a lc o n v e r s a t i o n s , o f t e n i n o n e - t o - o n e o r s m a l l - g r o u p

I

Page 13: Susan Gal 1. Introduction - Linguistic Society of …...Susan Gal 1. Introduction The historic silence of women in public life, and womenrs atternpts to gain a voice in politics and

ls

1 3

r e l a t i o n s h i p s i n t h e f a m i l y o r n e i g h b o r h o o d . T h i s c r e a t e s t h ei l l u s i o n t h a t g e n d e r e d t a l k i s m a i n l y a p e r s o n a Lc h a r a c t e r i s t i c o r l i n i t e d t o t h e i n s t i t u t i o n o f t h e f a m i l y .Ye t , as much fem in i s t r esea rch has demons t ra ted , gende r as as t r u c t u r a r p r i n c i p l e a r s o o r g a n i z e s o t h e r s o c i a ri n s t i t u t i o n s : w o r k p l a c e s , s c h o o l s , c o u r t r s , p o l i t i c a lassemb l i es and t he s ta te show cha rac te r i s t i c pa t t e rns i n t herec ru i tmen t , a l l oca t i on , t r ea tmen t and mob i l i t y o f men asopposed to women . These a re i nsc r i bed i n t he o rgan i za t i on o ft he i ns t i t u t i on . Pa t t e rns o f t a r k and i n te rac t i on p lay animpo r tan t r o re i n na in ta i n i ng , l eg i t ima t i ng and o f t en h id i ngthe gende red aspec t o f t hese i ns t i t u t i ona l a r rangemen ts . Ther o r e o f m e n t s a n d w o m e n I s l i n g u i s t i c s t r a t e g i e s w i t h i ni ns t i t u t i ons dese rves cons ide rab l y more a t t en t i on t han i t hass o f a r r e c e i v e d . f w i l I d i s c u s s o n l y a f e w s u g g e s t i v eexamp les f r om schoo l s and bu reauc rac ies i n t he US , andp o l i t i c a l a s s e m b l i e s i n s e v e r a l s m a I l s c a l e s o c i e t i e s .

W i t h i n i n s t i t u t i o n s , i n t e r v i e w s , m e e t i n g s a n d o t h e rcha rac te r i s t i c ve rba l encoun te rs a re o f t en c ruc ia r f o rd e c i s i o n m a k i n g . o n t h e b a s i s o f t a l k , s o m e i n d i v i d u a r s a r eh i r e d , c h o s e n t o p a r t i c i p a t e , r e c e i v e r e s o u r c e s , o rp romo t i ons and au tho r i t y , wh i l e o the rs a re den ied . f nconp lex , cap i t a l i s t soc ie t i es t he c l ass and e thn i c backg roundo f speake rs i s c ruc ia r i n such ga te -keep ing encoun te rs(E r i ckson and schu l t z r 9e2 ) . And gende r rou t i ne l y i n te rac t sw i t h c rass and e thn i c i t y . Fo r i ns tance , i n a s tudy o f speechin Amer i can cou r t s , t he t es t imony o f w i t nesses us ing t hel i ngu i s t i c f o rms cha rac te r i s t i c o f women w i t h no cou r t r oo rnexpe r i ence and o f l ow s ta tus men , was j udged by expe r imen ta ls u b j e c t s t o b e r e s s c r e d i b r e , r e s s c o n v i n c i n g a n d l e s st r u s t w o r t h y t h a n t e s t i r n o n y d e l i v e r e d i n a s t y r ec h a r a c t e r i s t i c o f s p e a k e r s w i t h h i g h s t a t u s ( o ' B a r r a n dA t k i n s L 9 B 0 ) . I t a p p e a r s t h a t c o u r t s r e i n f o r c e t h e a u t h o r i t yo f f o rms assoc ia ted w i t h h i gh s ta tus speake rs , who tend t o beInen.

The I 'mee t i ng ' r i s a speech even t ub iqu i t i ous i n Amer i canbu reauc ra t i c , co rpo ra te and academic 1 i f e . r n a s tudy o ff a c u l t y m e e t i n g s , E d e l s k y ( 1 9 8 1 ) c o n s i d e r e d t h e u n i v e r s i t y a sa w o r k p r a c e , n o t a s a n e d u c a t i o n a l i n s t i t u t i o n . r n m e e t i n g sw i th egua r numbers o f ma le and f emare pa r t i c i pan ts o f equ i loccupa t i on s ta tus , she asked whe the r women \ , { e re as success fu la s m e n i n " g e t t i n g t h e f l o o r , r , t h a t i s i n g e t t i n g t h eoppo r tun i t y t o t a l k and t he reby con t r i bu te t o t he dec i s i ons .B u t a d i r e c t c o m p a r i s o n o f m e n r s a n d w o m e n r s p a r t i c i p a t i o nwas no t poss ib l e . who spoke and how o f t en depended on t heimpr i c i t r u l - es by wh i ch speake rs pa r t i c i pa ted . And the re we rea t l e a s t t w o s e t s o f r u l e s , t w o k i n d s o f i l f 1 o o r . r ' f n

I

Page 14: Susan Gal 1. Introduction - Linguistic Society of …...Susan Gal 1. Introduction The historic silence of women in public life, and womenrs atternpts to gain a voice in politics and

L 4

e p i s o d e s c h a r a c t e r i z e d b y t h e f i r s t k i n d o f ' r f l o o r r r s p e a k e r stook l onge r and f ewer t u rns , f ewe r speake rs pa r t i c i pa tedo v e r a I l , t h e y d i d n o t o v e r l a p m u c h , t h e r e w e r e m a n y f a l s es ta r t s and hes i t a t i ons and speake rs used t he i r t u rns f o rr e p o r t i n g a n d v o i c i n g o p i n i o n s . T h e o t h e r k i n d o f r r f I o o r r loccu r red a t t he same mee t i ngs bu t du r i ng d i f f e ren t ep i sodes .I t was cha rac te r i zed by I o t s o f ove r l ap and s imu l t aneoust a I k , b u t 1 i t t l e h e s i t a t i o n i n s p e a k i n g , a n d m o r e g e n e r a lpa r t i c i pa t i on by many speake rs , co l l - abo ra t i ve l y cons t ruc t i ngr r $ / h a t I s - g o i n g - o n . " S e v e r a l s p e a k e r s d i d t h e s a m ecommun ica t i ve f unc t i ons such as sugges t i ng an i dea , a rgu ingo r a g r e e i n g ; j o k i n g , t e a s i n g a n d w i s e c r a c k i n g w e r e m o r ef requen t .

I t i s e v i d e n t t h a t t h e i n t e r a c t i o n a l s t r a t e g i e s o fAmer i can men and women , ds ou t l i ned by Ma l t z and Bo rke r , a red i f f e r e n t l y s u i t e d t o t h e t w o k i n d s o f " f l o o r . r r I t w a s m e nw h o m o n o p o l i z e d t h e f i r s t k i n d o f f l o o r , b y t a k i n g l o n g e rtu rns , ho ld i ng f o r t h and dom ina t i ng t he cons t ruc t i on o f t hef l oo r t h rough the t i r ne t hey t ook t a l k i ng . I n t he second k i ndo f f l oo r , whe re eve ryone took sho r te r t u rns , men and woment o o k t u r n s o f a b o u t e q u a 1 l e n g t h ; a n d a l I s p e a k e r spa r t i c i pa ted as equa ) - s i n t he comrnun i ca t i ve f unc t i onsp e r f o n n e d ( l - 9 8 1 : 4 1 6 ) . I r n p o r t a n t l y , t h e f i r s t , m o r e f o r m a lk i nd o f f l oo r i n wh i ch women pa r t i c i pa ted 1ess , occu r redvas t l y more f r equen t l y , a t l eas t i n t h i s i ns t i t u t i ona lse t t i ng . Exp l i c i t and t ac i t s t r ugg les be tween speake rs abou thow mee t i ngs a re t o be conduc ted a re con f l i c t s abou t t hecon t ro l o f i ns t i t u t i ona l power . Even among s ta tus equa l s andin rn i xed sex g roups , t he i n te rac t i ona l cons t ra i n t s o fi ns t i t u t i ona l even ts such as nee t i ngs a re no t gende r neu t ra l ,bu t we igh ted i n f avo r o f ma le i n te rac t i ona l s t r a teg ies . Theo rgan i za t i on o f t he rnee t i ng masks t he f ac t t ha t speake rs a reexc luded on t he bas i s o f gende r , wh i l e accomp l i sh ing t ha tve ry excLus ion .

Pe rhaps more pe rvas i ve l y t han any o the r i ns t i t u t i on ,s c h o o l s j u d g e , d e f i n e a n d c a t e g o r i z e t h e i r c h a r g e s o n t h eb a s i s o f l i n g u i s t i c p e r f o r m a n c e . T h e d i f f e r e n t s t r a t e g i e s o fb o y s a n d g i r l s c a n a l s o a f f e c t t h e i r a c c e s s t o t h e o f t e nl i n g u i s t i c r e s o u r c e s , s u c h a s I i t e r a c y , t h a t s c h o o l i n go f f e r s . A s i n g l e e x a m p l e w i l l s u f f i c e t o s u g g e s t h o w e t h n i cd i f f e r e n c e s i n t e r a c t w i t h g e n d e r i n t h i s p r o c e s s . r n h e r f i n ec o m p a r i s o n o f l a n g u a g e a c q u i s i t i o n a n d t r a i n i n g f o r l i t e r a c yi n t h r e e s o u t h e r n c o m m u n i t i e s i n t h e U S , H e a t h ( 1 9 8 3 )ca re fu l 1y desc r i bes t he comp lex and a r t f u l ) - i ngu i s t i cp r a c t i c e s o f a b l a c k w o r k i n g c l a s s c o m m u n i - t y . c h i l d r e n m u s trnas te r r r ana logy " ques t i ons posed by t he i r e rde rs , i n wh i chthey a re encou raged to see t he pa ra l - r e r s and connec t i ons

I

Page 15: Susan Gal 1. Introduction - Linguistic Society of …...Susan Gal 1. Introduction The historic silence of women in public life, and womenrs atternpts to gain a voice in politics and

J C

;i

i 5

a m o n g d i s p a r a t e e v e n t s a n d t e l l a b o u t t h e m c l e v e r l y , w i t h o u ts p e l l i n g o u t e x p l i c i t l y w h a t t h e l i n k s a r e . S u c h d e s c r i t i o n sd i f f e r f r om schoo l r equ i remen ts wh i ch ma tch m idd le c l assp a t t e r n s . A n d w h a t i s e x p e c t e d o f b l a c k g i r l s a t h o m e d i f f e r scons ide rab l y f r om the more ex tens i ve ve rba l sk i l I s demandedo f b o y s . W o r k i n g c l a s s b l a c k g i r I s , i n c o n t r a s t t o b o y s o ft he i r own g roup , a re ne i t he r expec ted no r encou raged top r a c t i c e a w i d e r a n g e o f s t o r y - t e l l i n g t a c t i c s i n c o m p e t i t i v er r o n - s t a g e r r p u b l i c a r e n a s w h e r e c o m m u n i t y a d u l t s a s w e I I a sc h i l d r e n w a t c h a n d j u d g e , ( 1 9 8 3 : 9 5 - 9 8 ; 1 0 5 - 1 1 2 ) .

T h e r e s u l t s o f t h e s e d i f f e r e n c e e m e r g e i n a p a r a l l e ls t u d y o f t e a c h e r - s t u d e n t i n t e r a c t i o n i n a f i r s t - g r a d ec l a s s r o o n w i t h b o t h b l a c k a n d w h i t e s t u d e n t s ( M i c h a e l s 1 9 8 1 ) .When the wh i t e t eache rs - - a11 women- - i ns t i t u ted a i l sha r i ng

t i r n e r f ( r r s h o w a n d t e l l t ' ) a c t i v i t y , t h e y h a d t h e e x p l i c i t g o a lo f b r i dg ing t he gap be tween the o ra l d i scou rse t he ch i l d rena l ready knew and the I i t e ra te d i scou rse s t ra teg ies t hey wou l -deven tua l l y have t o use i n w r i t t en commun ica t i on . They askedt h e c h i l d r e n t o t e l l a b o u t a s p e c i f i c o b j e c t o r g i v e anarra t ive account about some i rnpor tant past event . For thewh i t e boys and g i r l s t h i s wo rked qu i t e we l l . They t o l d t op i c -f ocused s to r i es t ha t t he t eache rs unde rs tood ; and t heteache rs r ques t i ons and commen ts he lped t he s tuden ts makethe i r s t o r i es more exp l i c i t and deve lop t he more comp lexs t ruc tu res o f s tanda rd l i t e racy . The wo rk ing c l ass b lackg i r l s howeve r , o rgan i zed t he i r s t o r i es t o resemb le ch i l d ren t sresponses t o r r ana logy r r ques t i ons . They no ted abs t rac tpa ra l l e l s be tween d i spa ra te s i t ua t i ons and even ts and re l i edon t he } i s t ene r t o i n fe r t he i np l i c i t l i n ks . A l t hough thewh i t e t eache rs we re o f t he same gende r as t he b lack g i r l s andhad exce l l en t i n ten t i ons , t hey f a i l ed t o unde rs tand t h i sp r i nc ip l e and t hus we re unab le t o co l l abo ra te w i t h t he b lackg i r l s i n p roduc ing more e labo ra te , s t r uc tu ra l l y comp lexs to r i es . The b lack g i r l s f e l t f r us t ra ted ; t he i r s t o r i es we rerare ly even conple ted before the teachers cut then of f . As aresu l t , they cou ld not benef i t f rom the s teps towardl i t e ra te , s tanda rd d i scou rse t ha t t he c l ass room ac t i v i t yappa ren t l y accomp l i shed f o r t he wh i t e ch i l d ren . They wou ldno t be ab le t o use t h i s t i ngu i s t i c sk i l I as an economicresou rce l a te r i n } i f e . The t eache rs we re a l so f r us t ra ted .To t hen i t appea red t ha t t he g i r l s cou ld no t " s t i c k t o t hepo in t t t no r d i sce rn wha t was ! t i r npo r tan t . r r on t he bas i s o fnany such i n te rac t i ons t he b l - ack g i r l s wou ld be j udgedin te l l ec tua l l y i nadequa te .

Th i s ab i l i t y o f soc ia l i ns t i t u t i ons t o c rea te gende redde f i n i t i ons o f speake rs t h rough ta l k i s equa l l y i l l u s t ra tedby po l i t i ca l assemb l i es i n sma l l - sca1e soc ie t i es whe re adu l t

I

Page 16: Susan Gal 1. Introduction - Linguistic Society of …...Susan Gal 1. Introduction The historic silence of women in public life, and womenrs atternpts to gain a voice in politics and

L O

m e n c o n s i d e r e a c h o t h e r e q u a l s . I n m a n y s u c h s o c i e t i e s , a samong the Ma lagasy and t he Laym i f nd ians desc r i bed above ,o n l y m e n t a l k a t p u b l i c , p o l i t i c a l m e e t i n g s . E t h n o g r a p h e r shave repea ted l y desc r i bed men I s t a l k i . n t h i s con tex t asa l l u s i v e a n d i n d i r e c t , r n a k i n g u s e o f i m a g e s , p a r a b l e s , a n dme tapho rs t o h i de , ve i l o r anb igua te t he re fe ren t i a l message ,t h e r e b y d e n y i n g c o n f l i c t ( B r e n n e i s a n d M y e r s 1 9 8 4 ) . W o m e nare exc luded on t he g rounds t ha t t hey l ack t he necessa ryv e r b a l s u b t l e t y . T h i s s e e m s t o s u g g e s t t h a t s p e e c hd i f f e rences a re power fu l i ndeed , s i nce t hey seem to d i r ec t l yI i m i t w o m e n r s a c c e s s t o t h e p o l i t i c a l p r o c e s s . H o w e v e r ,e thnog raphe rs a l so repo r t t ha t t he mee t i ngs a re no t t he rna ins i t e o f d e c i s i o n m a k i n g , a n d i n d i r e c t s p e e c h i s n o t p r i m a r i l ya m e a n s o f p e r s u a s i o n o r c o e r c i o n . U s u a l l y d e c i s i o n s a r e m a d eand concensus reached be fo re and a f t e r t he rnee t i ng i ni n fo rma l d i scuss ions t ha t emp loy a more d i r ec t s t y l e and i nw h i c h w o m e n p a r t i c i p a t e a c t i v e l y , t h e r e b y h a v i n gc o n s i d e r a b l e e f f e c t o n d e c i s i o n s ( H a r r i s 1 9 8 0 : 7 3 ; K e e n a n1 - 9 7 4 ; L e d e r m a n f 9 B 4 ) . W h a t , t h e n , i s t h e r n e a n i n g a n d e f f e c to f w o m e n f s e x c l u s i o n f r o m s p e a k i n g a t m e e t i n g s ?

T h e I i n g u i s t i c f o r m o f p o l i t i c a l m e e t i n g s d e f i n e s n o thow dec i s i on - rnak ing ac tua l l y occu rs , bu t r a the r wha t can beshown ' r ons tage r r ; wha t can be f ocused on as t he l eg i t i r na terea l i t y . Compara t i ve ev idence sugges ts t ha t nee t i ngs a twh i ch o rde rs a re g i ven o r announced by I eade rs ra t i f y anideo logy o f h i e ra rchy , r ega rd less o f t he way dec i s i ons we reo r i g i na l l y r eached . Mee t i ngs i n wh i ch i nd i rec tness c rea tes aIack o f coe rc i on and h ie ra rchy be tween pa r t i c i pan ts ra t i f y ani d e o l o g y o f e g a l i t a r i a n r e l a t i o n s , a t I e a s t i n s o c i e t i e sw h e r e t h e r e a r e f e w o t h e r i n s t i t u t i o n a L i z e d p o l i t i c a ls t r u c t u r e s ( f r v i n e I 9 7 9 ) . I f m e n I s i n d i r e c t o r a t o r ycons t ruc t s t he soc ia l - r ea r i t y o f an ega l i t a r i an ma le po l i t y ,t hen t he exc rus ion o f women c rea tes t he rea l i t y andleg i t i r na tes t he i deo logy o f womenrs subo rd ina t i on t o t ha tpo l i t y . As Lede rman (1984 ) po in t s ou t abou t t he Mend i o f NewGu inea , f o r t he wonen r i s t en ing i n s i l ence a t such a mee t i ng ,t h i s r ea l i t y i s a l - l - t he ha rde r t o cha l l enge s i nce i t i sf onna l l y ac ted ou t bu t neve r exp l i c i t l y a r t i cu la ted .

f n sum, soc ie ta l i ns t i t u t i ons a re no t neu t ra l . con tex t sfo r t a I k . They a re o rgan i zed t o de f i ne , demons t ra te anden fo rce t he l eg i t imacy and au tho r i t y o f l i ngu i s t i c s t r a teg iesused by one gende r o r men o f one c l ass o r e thn i c g roup - -wh i l e deny ing t he power o f o the rs . 15 Fo rms tha t d i ve ige u r "devau led by t he do rn inan t i deo log ies . ' rF roo rs " w i t h manyp a r t i c i p a n t s , b l a c k g i r l s t s t o r i e s , w o m e n r s g o s s i p i n s p a i n ,Mend i womenrs d i r ec tness , a I l a t t emp t t o con tes t t he hegemonyo f t he dom inan t f o rms . Bu t i t i s no t t he , f l oo r r t ha t i ;

I

Page 17: Susan Gal 1. Introduction - Linguistic Society of …...Susan Gal 1. Introduction The historic silence of women in public life, and womenrs atternpts to gain a voice in politics and

' ' i l

L 1

j u d g e d i n a u s p i c i o u s , r a t h e r w o m e n a r e s e e n a s t i n i d o r u n a b l eto exp ress t hemse l ves ; i t i s no t t ha t t he b lack g i r l s haved i f f e ren t s to r y - t e l I i ng expe r i ences t han wh i t e ch i l d ren andless t r a i n i ng t han b lack boys , bu t t ha t t hey canno t t h i nkp rope r l y . Desp i t e t he res i s tance demons t ra ted i n women tsl i n g u i s t i c p r a c t i c e s , B o u r d i e u f s ( L 9 7 7 b ) r e m a r k a b o u t t h ee f f e c t s o f t h i s k i n d o f l i n g u i s t i c d o m i n a t i o n a p p l i e s : b yau tho r i z rng some I i ngu i s t i c p rac t i ces and no t o the rs , t heins t i t u t i on appea rs t o demons t ra te t he i n fe r i o r i t y o f t hosewho use unau tho r i zed f o rms and o f t en i ncu l - ca tes i n t hemf e e l i n g s o f w o r t h l e s s n e s s .

Bu t no t i ce t ha t t he Mend i mee t i ng , I i ke Mme Ro land ' sf o r u m s , a n d s i n g l e - s p e a k e r r r f 1 o o r s , r r a l s o i l l u s t r a t e a n o t h e rso r t o f symbo l i c power I r nen t i oned a t t he s ta r t o f t h i spape r : t hey a re i n te rac t i ona l and l i ngu i s t i c f o rms , bu t no ton l y t ha t ; t hey a l so a t t emp t t o impose and l eg i t ima te ce r ta i nde f i n i t i ons o f women , men and soc ie t y . I now tu rn t o af u l l e r d i s c u s s i o n o f t h i s s e c o n d a s p e c t o f s y n b o l i cdom ina t i on and t he way womenrs vo i ces a re some t imes ra i seda g a i n s t i t .

4 . G e n r e s o f R e s i s t a n c e

Desp i t e t he l ong -s tand ing Wes te rn emphas i s on l anguageas p r i na r i l y a means o f r ep resen t i ng an a l r eady ex i s t i ngrea l i t y , an th ropo log i s t s have l ong been aware o f t he ways i nwh i ch t he me tapho rs , I i t e ra r y gen res and i n te rac t i ona lar rangements readi ly ava i lab le in a communi ty shape the h/ayspeake rs de f i ne t he soc ia l wo r l d . I n sho r t , conven t i ona ll anguage and i t s conven t i ona l usage a re no t neu t ra l med ia f o rd e s c r i b i n g s o c i a l I i f e . S o m e f o r m u l a t i o n s a b o u t s o c i a l I i f e ,when i nsc r i bed i n a d i v i son o f l abo r o r o the r o rgan i za t i ona lf o rm , se rve one g roup ts i n te res t s be t t e r t han t ha t o f o the rs .A hegemon ic d i scou rse , i n t h i s b road sense , i s a f o rm o fpower , and i s some t i nes res i s ted o r con tes ted .

Th i s impo r tan t and qu i t e gene ra l no t i on o f a dyna rn i cbe tween dom inan t and subo rd ina te d i scou rses o r p rac t i ces hasbeen d i scussed , i n many f o rms and w i t h many t e rm ino log ies , bya v a r i e t y o f s o c i a l t h e o r i s t s . H o w e v e r , f e m i n i s t s c h o l a r shave been s t rong l y i n f l uenced by a I im i t ed ve rs i on o f t h i si n s i g h t , e x p l i c i t l y a p p l i e d t o w o m e n . A r d e n e r , E . ( 1 9 7 5 ) a n dA r d e n e r , S . ( 1 9 7 5 ) a r g u e t h a t w o m e n , d u e t o t h e i r s t r u c t u r a lp o s i t i o n s , h a v e d i f f e r e n t m o d e l s o f r e a l i t y t h a n t h e m a l e -d o m i n a t e d s o c i e t a L m o d e l . T h e f o r m o f w o m e n r s m o d e l s i s o f t e nn o n - v e r b a I , i n a r t i c u l a t e o r v e i l e d , w h i l e t h e d i s c o u r s e o fnen i s no re ve rba l and exp l i c i t , and t he reby more cong ruen tw i t h t he usuaL d i scou rse o f wes te rn soc ia l - sc i ence . Be ingunab le t o exp ress t he i r s t r uc tu ra l l y gene ra ted v i ews i n t he

I

Page 18: Susan Gal 1. Introduction - Linguistic Society of …...Susan Gal 1. Introduction The historic silence of women in public life, and womenrs atternpts to gain a voice in politics and

rB

d o m i n a n t a n d m a s c u l i n e d i s c o u r s e , w o m e n a r e n e i t h e ru n d e r s t o o d n o r h e e d e d , a n d b e c o m e i n a r t i c u l a t e , t t n u t e d , t r o reven s i l en t . f n such cases women may ta l k a . - I o t , bu t do no te x p r e s s t h e i r o w n d i f f e r e n t s o c i a l r e a l i t y . r o

The r rmu ted g roup r r t hes i s use fu l ) - y d raws a t t en t i on t o t heimpo r tance o f t he symbo l i c l anguage , t he f o rm , o f do rn inan ta n d s u b o r d i n a t e d i s c o u r s e . H o w e v e r , d s I w i l l d e m o n s t r a t ew i t h a s e r i e s o f e x a m p l e s , t h e A r d e n e r s r f o r m u l a t i o n i sf l a w e d i n s e v e r a l r e s p e c t s . F i r s t , i t a s s u m e s t h a tt t m u t e d n e s s t t i s a s t a t i c r e f l e x o f w o m e n r s s t r u c t u r a Lp o s i t i o n . f n c o n t r a s t , w h e n v i e w e d i n t e r m s o f b r o a d e rtheo r i es o f gende r and symbo l i c dom ina t i on , r rmu tedness r l

b e c o m e s o n l y o n e o f m a n y t h e o r e t i c a l l y p o s s i b l e o u t c o m e s o fg e n d e r r e l a t i o n s . A m u c h w i d e r a r r a y o f w o m e n r s v e r b a ls t r a t e g i e s a n d g e n r e s b e c o m e s v i s i b l e , s o m e c o n s i d e r a b l y m o r ea r t i cu la te and more ac t i ve l - y oppos i t i ona l t o dom inan t mode l st h a n t h e r r m u t e d n e s s r r t h e s i s a I l o w s . S e c o n d , i f d o m i n a t i o n a n dr e s i s t a n c e a r e r n a t t e r s o f i n t e r a c t i o n a l p r a c t i c e a s w e l l a ss t ruc tu re , as f have been a rgu ing , t hen we mus t f ocus no t onr rmu tedness r r as a s t ruc tu ra l p roduc t , bu t on t he p rocesses bywh ich wonen a re rende red r rmu te r r o r manage to cons t ruc td i ssen t i ng gen res and res i s t i ng d i scou rses . As War ren andB o u r g u e s u g g e s t : r r . . . u n d e r s t a n d i n g d o m i n a n c e a n d m u t i n g I a sp r o c e s s e s l r e q u i r e s a b r o a d e r a n a l y s i s o f t h e p o l i t i c a leconomic and i ns t i t u t i ona l con tex t s i n wh i ch rea l i t y i sn e g o t i a t e d , ( 1 9 8 5 : 2 6 1 ) . "

E thnog raphy i t se l f i s such a con tex t , f o r e thnog raph i crepo r t s a re deep l y i np l i ca ted i n t he p rocess o f r ep resen t i ngse l f and o the rs , c rea t i ng images o f soc ia l r ea l i t y t h roughl a n g u a g e . K e e n l y a w a r e o f t h i s , f e m i n i s t c r i t i c s o fan th ropo logy have cha rged t ha t women i n t he soc ie t i es s tud iedwere i gno red o r pe rce i ved as i ne r t because and rocen t r i ce thnog raphe rs d i sm issed women and t he i r conce rns , nak ing t hema p p e a r p a s s i v e a n d s i l e n t , F e m i n i s t s c h a l l e n g e d t h e a u t h o r i t ya n d c r e d i b i l i t y o f t h e s e m a l e - b i a s e d a c c o u n t s . B u t A r d e n e r r sthes i s sugges ts t ha t t he p rob lem i s more comp lex . f t c l a i nstha t women ra re l y r r spea [ ' t i n soc ia l an th ropo ) .og i ca I r epo r t sbecause soc ia l sc i ence i nves t i ga to rs o f bo th sexes demand thek ind o f a r t i cu la te mode l s p rov ided by men , no t by mu tedwomen . And i ndeed , some women an th ropo log i s t s have a l socomp la ined o f t he i na r t i cu la teness o f women i n fo rman ts i nsome con tex t s . I t seens t he re i s a need to re -exam ine howe thnog raph ies a re c rea ted . Cu r ren t l y , j us t such a re -exa rn ina t i on i s a l so t he p ro jec t o f an th ropo log i s t s who a res i m i r a r r y c h a r r e n g i n g t h e a u t h o r i t y o f e t h n o g r a p h i c w r i t i n g ,b u t o n d i f f e r e n t g r o u n d s . F o l l o w i n g p o s t - m o d e r n i s t t r e n d s i nph i rosophy , t hey asse r t t ha t t r ad i t i ona l - e thnog raph ies mask

I

Page 19: Susan Gal 1. Introduction - Linguistic Society of …...Susan Gal 1. Introduction The historic silence of women in public life, and womenrs atternpts to gain a voice in politics and

I

1 9

t l g a c t u a l p r a c t i c e o f f i e l d w o r k a n d w r i t i r g , ( M a r c u s a n dc l i f f o r d 1 9 8 5 ) . B y c l a i m i n g t o a c c u r a t e r y r e p r e s e n t t h efac t s abou t an exo t i c cu l t u re , t he na i ve rea l i s t conven t i onso f e thnog raph i c w r i t i ng imp r i c i t r y deny t ha t e thnog raph i cfac t s a re se lec ted , i ndeed cons t ruc ted i n t he encoun te rbe tween the an th ropo log i s t and t he ' o the r ' who i s he r /h i ssub jec t . r n o rde r t o re f rec t t he p rocess o f e thnog raph i ck n o w l e d g e , t h e s e c r i t i c s s u g g e s t e x p e r i m e n t a t i o n w l t nl i t e ra r y f o rms so t ha t w r i t i ng - may be a "po l yvoca l ' andd ia log i c p roduc t i on i n wh i ch t he e thnog raphe r l e t J t he peop lespeak and ethnographic fac ts are shown to be jo in t ly proauteaby ethnographer and in formant .

w h a t h a s r e c e i v e d t o o r i t t l e a t t e n t i o n i n a r r t h e s ec r i t i gues i s t he unavo idab l y power - cha rged ve rba l encoun te ri n wh i ch an th ropo rog i s t s and na t i ve speake rs , w i t h d i f f e ren ti n te res t s , goa l s and deep l y unequa l pos i t i ons rnee t anda t t e n p t t o t a l k . K e e s i n g ( 1 9 B 5 ) p r o v i d e s a f a s c i n a t i n gexampre o f t he e thnog raph i c i n te r v i ew as a r i ngu i s t i ip r a c t i c e . I n o r d e r t o r e c o r d w o m e n r s v e r s i o n s o f n a t i i e l i f e(Xas ton ) among the Kwa io , a t enac ious ry t r ad i t i onaL g roupJ . i v i ng i n t he so lomon r s l ands o f t he sou th pac i f i c , xees ingh a d t o a n a r y z e w h a t h e c a r l s t h e r m i c r o p o r i t i c s r o f t a l k . r ;r esponse t o Kees ing ' s r eques t s , t he men c rea ted and t o rd l i f eh i s to r i es eage r l y and a r t f u l " l y , even t hough the Kwa io racksuch a gen re as we rL as a t r ad i t i on o f se r f - r eve la t i on andse r f -exp rana t i on on wh i ch t he wes te rn l i t e ra r y f o rm o f t heau tob iog rahpy i s based . r n con t ras t , Kees ing recoun ts t ha the cou ld no t e l i c i t au tob iog raph i ca l , na r ra t i ves f r om women ,no t even t hose who we re o ld , know ledgeab le and i n f l uen t i a l .They spoke to h in in a f ragmented, inar t icu la te and jok ingwdy, espec ia l ly in f ront o f e lder men who urged thern t ;cooperate . They appeared d is t ressed wi th what was requestedo f t hem! r rmu te . r r A subseguen t f i e l d t r i p , e i gh t yea rs ra te r ,th is t ine wi th a woman ethnographer , brought qu i le d i f ferentresu l ts . rn sess ions wi th both e thnographers , Kwaio wornentook con t ro l o f t he encoun te rs , even b r i ng ing f emaLe f r i endsas aud ience t o t he reco rd ing sess ions . Bu t , un r i ke t he men ,who had p rov ided soc ie ta l r u l es and pe rsona l l i f e na r ra t i ves ,!h" women re jected the ethnographers I personar guest ions andinstead created rnora l tex ts about the v i r tues o f womanhood,i nse r t i ng pe rsona l expe r i ences on l y t o i l l u s t ra te womenrsposs ib re pa ths t h rough I i f e . Th rough the i r t ex t s , Kwa io womenwere re formulat ing and embel l ish ing a Iong-s tanding s t ra tegyo f K w a i o m e n : T o e n l i s t t h e ( a t f i r s t ) u n k n o w i n gan th ropo log i s t i n t he i r e f f o r t s t o cod i f y and au tho r i ze Xwa ioc u s t o m . B y r e g i t i r n a t i n g t h e i r o w n c u s t o m s i n a nanthropolog ized form the Kwaio men were ab le to use i t tores is t the demands of s ta te regula t ions, thereby at tempt i .g ,

I

Page 20: Susan Gal 1. Introduction - Linguistic Society of …...Susan Gal 1. Introduction The historic silence of women in public life, and womenrs atternpts to gain a voice in politics and

2 0

t h r o u g h v i g o r o u s n e o - t r a d i t i o n a l i s m , t o m a i n t a i n t h e i rp o l i t i c a l a u t o n o m y i n t h e f a c e o f c o l o n i a l a n d n e o - c o l o n i a 1i n c u r s i o n s .

A d e e p e r u n d e r s t a n d i n g o f K w a i o w o m e n r s t a l k r e q u i r e sr e v i s i o n s o f a l l t h r e e c r i t i q u e s o f a n t h r o p o l o g i c a lf i e l dwork . C lea r l y Kwa io women were no t so much s t ruc tu ra l l ymu te a nd i na r t i . cu la te as respons i ve t o t he immed ia tei n t e r a c t i o n a l c o n t e x t , e s p e c i a l l y r e l a t i o n s o f g e n d e ri nequa l i t y w i t h i n t he i r own soc ie t y and i n t he e thnog raph i ci n te r v i ew . P ragma t i c ana l yses o f t he i n te r v i ew as a speecheven t sugges t i t i s t he e thnog raphe r ' s t ask t o d i scove r t hec o n d i t i o n s u n d e r w h i c h i n f o r m a n t s c a n t a l k . S i m i l a r l y , i t i sn o t e n o u g h t o i n s i s t , d s t h e p o s t - m o d e r n i s t c r i t i c s d o , t h a tt he e thnog raph i c encoun te r and t he gen res t ha t emerge f r om i ta r e j o i n t l y p r o d u c e d . W h i I e i m p o r t a n t a n d a c c u r a t e , t h i sobse rva t i on by i t se l f i gno res t he impo r tance o f gende r ando t h e r f o r m s o f i n e q u a l i t y . I t o m i t s t h e s e v e r a l l e v e l s o fu n e q u a l p o w e r a n d p r i v i l e g e w h i c h c h a r a c t e r i z e t h ee thnog raph i c encoun te r and wh i ch a l so de te rm ine who i s ab let o t a l k a n d w h a t i t i s p o s s i b l e o r s t r a t e g i c t o s a y . T h ew o m e n r s i n a r t i c u l a t e n e s s a n d s u b s e q u e n t r r v o i c e r I a s m u c h a st h e m e n r s s y s t e m a t i z a t i o n o f t h e i r c u l t u r e , w e r e r e s p o n s e s t ow ide r f i e l ds o f f o r ce wh i ch assu re t ha t some tex t s o r gen resa re more power fu l t han o the rs , mak ing a s imp le co -p roduc t i ono f e t h n o g r a p h i c t e x t s i m p o s s i b l e , ( A s a d 1 9 8 6 , P o l i e r a n dR o s e b e r r y l - 9 8 8 : 1 5 ) . F i n a l l y , f e r n i n i s t s w o u L d h a v econ f i den t l y p red i c ted t he changes p roduced by t he p resence o fa woman an th ropo log i s t , and wou ld have unde rs tood t ha t t hegen re o f au tob iog raphy i s p rob le rna t i c no t on l y because i t i scu l t u ra l l y spec i f i c t o t he Wes t , bu t a l so because i t has beenshaped by_ wes te rn gende r i deo logy t ha t assumes a ma lesub jec t . L t Ye t t he case o f Kwa io women sugges ts rev i s i onsand expans ions f o r gende r t heo r i es as we l - l : A f ema lee thnog raphe r may be on l y pa r t o f t he answer . I n t h i s case ,t he p resence o f t he ma le an th ropo rog i s t was a rso impo r tan t ,f o r t he women were a t t uned t o h i - s es tab l i shed ro l e asrned ia to r be tween the Kwa io and t he ou t s i de wo r l d . Thus ,a t t en t i on mus t be pa id t o re l a t i ons o f power t ha t connec tKwa io soc ie t y t o a wo r l d sys tem i n wh i ch , 3s t he Kwa io a rea w a r e , a n t h r o p o l o g i s t s , d s w i e l d e r s o f w e s t e r n d i s c o u r s e ,have au tho r i t y t ha t Kwa io women , pe rhaps d i f f e ren t )_y t hanmen, can t ry to channel to the i r own ends through thee thnog raph i c i n te r v i ew .

Ethnography is on ly one of the many contexts in which wecan obse rve t he p rocesses t ha t make women seem r rmu ten .Ano the r examp le i s p rov ided by an e l i t e i n te l l ec tua l - s t udyg r o u p , t h e M e n r s a n d W o m e n r s C l u b o f L B B 0 s L o n d o n , a n d t h e i r

I

Page 21: Susan Gal 1. Introduction - Linguistic Society of …...Susan Gal 1. Introduction The historic silence of women in public life, and womenrs atternpts to gain a voice in politics and

l : r t

2 L

d i s c u s s i o n s o f s e x u a l i t y ( W a 1 - k o w i t z 1 9 8 6 ) . C I u b r u l e sa s s e r t e d m e n r s a n d w o m e n r s e q u a l i t y , b u t r u l e n u m b e r 1 7 ,a c c e p t e d b y a I I , s t i p u l a t e d t h a t d i s c u s s i o n m u s t s t a y w i t h i na D a r w i n i a n , s c i e n t i f i c f r a m e w o r k . T h a t b o t h a s s u r e d a n d h i dmenrs dom inance . Fo r women members respec ted , bu t l acked ,s u c h s c i e n t i f i c k n o w l e d g e . T h i s i s a t o n c e a n i n s t a n c e o fl i ngu i s t i c dom ina t i on , and an a t t emp t a t i r npos i t i on o f as o c i a l r e a l i t y : W o m e n r s p r i v a t e l e t t e r s r e v e a l t h a t m a n yfound the t e rms o f such a sc ience i nadequa te t o exp ressI ' comp lex t hough t and f ee l i ng " abou t t he d i f f i cu l t i es o ft he i r sexua l 1 i ves . M inu tes o f t he mee t i ngs sugges t t ha tf ace - to - f ace w i t h men , women we re o f t en s i l - enced by t h i sd i l emrna . Bu t o the r da ta show va r i ous a t t emp ts t o f o rmu la teoppos i t ion : t r a n s f o r m i n g o r a d a p t i n g m e n r s s c i e n t i f i ca rgumen ts i n pape rs w r i t t en f o r t he c l ub , w r i t i ng p r i va tele t t e r s o f comp la in t t o each o the r , and even a t t emp t i ng t oc r e a t e a d i f f e r e n t i d i o m f o r t a l k i n g a b o u t s e x u a l i t y b yd r a w i n g o n p u b l i c e v e n t s o f t h e t i m e .

I f women a re no t a lways s i l en t o r i na r t i cu la te , t hen t hetask o f an th ropo logy i s t o seek ou t and unde rs tand t he gen resand d i scou rses women p roduce . Espec ia l l y r evea l i ng a re gen restha t , c rea ted by speake rs f o r t hemse l ves t o re f l ec t on t he i ro w n e x p e r i e n c e , a r e n o t p r i m a r i J . y a p r o d u c t o f t h eethnographic in terv iew. As I have a l ready shown, s tudents o fe v e r y d a y t a l k h a v e i d e n t i f i e d m e n r s a n d w o m e n r s o f t e nd i f f e ren t ve rba l gen res ; s tuden ts o f o ra l - l i t e ra tu re haveca ta logued the i r f o rms and t he ru l es f o r t he i r pe r fo rmance( e . g . S h e r z e r 1 9 8 7 ) . B u t t h e s e a r e n o t s i m p l y ' r w a y s o fspeak ing ; t ' t he d i f f e rences i n con ten t o r pe rspec t i ve t ha tt hey o f t en cons t ruc t dese rve equa l a t t en t i on . I ndeed , i t i si n t h e c o n j u n c t i o n o f f o r m , c o n t e n t a n d c o n t e x t o fpe r fo rmance tha t womenrs consc iousness emerges . F i r s t , [ yexa rnp les w i l I demons t ra te t he g rea t r ange o f a r t i cu la tenesse v i d e n t i n w o m e n r s g e n r e s . S e c o n d , w h i l e w o m e n r s g e n r e s o f t e nd i ve rge f r om menrs , t he ev idence does r ro t suppo r t a t hes i s o fsepa ra te womenrs cu l t u res . On the con t ra r y , t hey can bes t beread as commen ta ry t ha t shows a range o f r esponse - -a c c e p t a n c e , r e s i s t a n c e , s u b v e r s i o n a n d o p p o s i t i o n t od o m i n a n t , o f t e n n a l e d i s c o u r s e .

Women so rne t imes p roduce a cu l t u ra l commen ta ry o f ges tu rea n d r i t u a l t h a t m a y b e c a l l e d i n a r t i c u l a t e b e c a u s e i t r e j e c t swords a l t oge the r . An impo r tan t i ns tance occu r red i n t heN i g e r i a n W o n e n r s W a r o f 1 9 2 9 . D u r i n g t h e m a s s i v e p r o t e s t sa g a i n s t p r o p o s e d t a x a t i o n o f w o m e n r s p r o p e r t y b y t h e c o l o n i a lgove rnmen t , women re - f o rmu la ted on a I a rge sca le a l oca I I yp r a c t i c e d c u s t o m o f o b s c e n e d a n c i n g c a l l e d " s i t t - i n g o n an a n , r r t h a t t r a d i t i o n a J - 1 y o c c u r r e d a t t h e h o u s e s o f m e n w h o

I

Page 22: Susan Gal 1. Introduction - Linguistic Society of …...Susan Gal 1. Introduction The historic silence of women in public life, and womenrs atternpts to gain a voice in politics and

2 2

had ove r - s tepped soc ia l mo res uphe ld by women . Con tempora ryw i t n e s s e s o f t h e W o m e n r s W a r r e p o r t t h a t w o m e n r s p r o t e s t si nc luded march ing nude , I y i ng on t he g round k i ck i ng t he i rl egs i n t he a i r and mak ing obscene ges tu res . As I f eka -Mo l - l e r( 1 9 7 5 ) e x p l a i n s , t h e s e g e s t u r e s w e r e m y s t e r i o u s a n d a l a r m i n gto Eu ropean obse rve rs bu t , f o r t he women and men i nvo l ved ,t hey cons t i t u ted an e loquen t p ro tes t aga ins t t he ma lepo l i t i ca l con t ro l and gove rn rnen t t axa t i on t ha t women saw as av i o l - a t i o n o f t h e i r r i g h t s .

A s i n i l a r l y ges tu ra l bu t much more con t rad i c to r y andacgu iescen t p rac t i ce i s Amer i can womenrs consump t i on o fpopu la r r oman t i c nove l s . I f we ana l yze on l y t he t ex t sthemse l ves , r omance reade rs appea r as pass i ve consumers o f ahegemon ic popu la r cu l t u re t ha t demeans t hem by p resen t i ngi m a g e s o f w o m e n a s i I l o g i c a l a n d m a g n e t i z e d b y r n a l eb r u t a l i t y . B u t R a d w a y ( 1 9 8 4 ) e x a m i n e s n o t j u s t t h e c o n t e n tbu t t he soc ia l even t o f r ead ing . She shows tha t f o r manyromance reade rs , r ead ing i t seJ - f , o f t en done i n s to l en momen tso f p r i v a c y , i s a c o m b a t i v e a c t , c o n t e s t i n g t h e u s u a l s e l f -a b n e g a t i o n o f t h e i r 1 i v e s . Y e t , w h i l e r e v e a l i n g a r e a lt ens ion i n dom inan t gende r i deo logy , t h i s i s a I im i t ed andse l f - de fea t i ng p ro tes t : r ead ing a l l ows t empora ry escape f r oml im i t ed 1 i ves , bu t t he t ex t s make those l i ves seem mored e s i r a b l e .

A more ve rba l l y exp l i c i t and subve rs i ve , ye t ve i l ed andamb iguous gen re , i s t he o ra l l y r i c poe t r y (gh innawas )pe r fo rmed among i n t ima tes by t he Bedou in o f Egyp t t s Wes te rnD e s e r t . f n d e s c r i b i n g t h e s e d e ) . i c a t e , b r i e f a n d a r t f u l l yi rnprov ised per f ormances, Abu-Lughod ( l -98 6 ) s t resses that thedominan t i deo logy , t he "pub l i c l anguage r r o f t he Bedou in i sone o f hono r , au tonomy , se l f - r nas te ry , pe rsona l s t r eng th andsexua l nodes t y . The poems d i rec t l y v i o l a te t h i s code o f hono rand i r np l i c i t l y c r i t i c i ze i t by exp ress ing t he f ee l i ngs o fdependeDCy , eno t i ona l vu lne rab i l i t y , and ronan t i c l ong ingcondemned by t he o f f i c i a l v i ew . The poe t r y cons t i t u tes wha tA b u - L u g h o d c a I I s a r r d i s s i d e n t o r s u b v e r s i v e d i s c o u r s e

mos t c l ose l y assoc ia ted w i t h you ths and women , t hed i sadvan taged dependen ts who l eas t embody t he i dea l s o fBedou ian soc ie t y and have I eas t t o ga in i n t he sys tem ass t r u c t u r e d . . . . P o e t r y i s t h e d i s c o u r s e o f o p p o s i t i o n t o t h es y s t e m a n d o f d e f i a n c e o f t h o s e w h o r e p r e s e n t i t ,( 1 9 8 6 2 2 5 1 ) . " Bu t t he poe t r y i s an th ing bu t a spon taneouso u t p o u r i n g o f f e e l i n g . f n d e e d , i t s f o r m a l p r o p e r t i e s a n dcon tex t o f pe r fo rmance enhance i t s ab i l i t y t o sub t l y ca r r ym e s s a g e s c o u n t e r t o o f f i c i a l i d e a l s . I t i s f o r m u l a i c , t h e r e b yd i s g u i s i n g t h e i d e n t i t i e s o f p o e t , a d d r e s s e e a n d s u b j e c t . I ti s f l ee t i ng and amb iguous , pe r fo r rned by women and you ths

I

Page 23: Susan Gal 1. Introduction - Linguistic Society of …...Susan Gal 1. Introduction The historic silence of women in public life, and womenrs atternpts to gain a voice in politics and

2 3

among t r us ted i n t i r na tes who can dec iphe r i t exac t l y becauset h e y a l r e a d y k n o w t h e r e c i t e r w e l l . Y e t , t h i s p o e t r y o fs u b v e r s i o n a n d d e f i a n c e i s n o t o n l y t o l e r a t e d ; i t i scu l t u ra l l y e l abo ra ted and adm i red because o f t he pa radox i ca li n t e r t w i n i n g o f o f f i c a l a n d d i s s i d e n t d i s c o u r s e . T h e o r a lpoe t r y revea l s a f undamen ta l t ens ion o f Bedou in soc ia l andp o l i t i c a l l i f e w h i c h , w h i l e v a l u i n g a n d d e m a n d i n g a u t o n o r n yand egua l i t y be tween l i neages , demands i nequa l i t y be tween theg e n d e r s a n d g e n e r a t i o n s w i t h i n l i n e a g e s a n d f a m i l i e s . r r A

d i scou rse o f de f i ance by t hose s l i gh ted i n t he sys tem,[poe t r y ] i s exa l t ed because a re fusa l t o be dom ina ted i s keyt o B e d o u i n p o l i t i c a l l i f e , a n d i t i s a v o i d e d b y [ m a l e ] e l d e r sbecause i t t h rea tens t o expose t he i l l eg i t imacy o f t he i ra u t h o r i t y , ( A b u - L u g h o d 1 9 8 5 : 2 5 4 ) . t t T h u s , t h e v e r b a l g e n r e o fwomen and you ths revea l s t he con t rad i c t i ons o f t he ru l i ngi d e o l o g y .

M y f i n a l e x a m p l e i s a p o e t i c g e n r e m o r e v e r b a l l ye x p l i c i t , m o r e d i r e c t l y c r i t i c a l o f s o c i a l a n d p o l i t i c a lr e l a t i o n s , a n d m u c h I e s s a c c e p t e d b y o f f i c i a l i d e o l o g i e s .Though l im i t ed t o a much sma l l e r segmen t o f t he f ema lep o p u l a t i o n , i t i s e q u a l l y r e v e a l i n g o f c o n t r a d i c t i o n s i ndo rn inan t d i scou rses . M ig ran t l abo re rs , mov ing be tween thern ines o f Sou th A f r i ca and t he i r na t i ve Leso tho , compose agen re o f poe t i c songs ca lLed 1 i f e1a , pe r fo rmed compe t i t i ve l y ,o f t e n f o r a f e e , b y r m e n o f e l o q u e n c e r u s u a l l y a t s o c i a lgather ings in border towns. They s ing of pover ty and forcedrn ig ra t i on ; t he i r songs re i n fo r ce a roo tedness i n t he ru ra lv i l I a g e , d e s p i t e m i g r a t i o n , a n d a l o n g i n g f o r t r a d i t i o n a lge ron toc ra t i c and pa t r i a r cha l soc ia l r e l a t i ons . Howeve r ,t he re a re a l so some women who s i ng l i f e l a . Bu t t he i rc i r cums tances , ds we l l as t he con ten t o f t he i r poe t r y , a res i g n i f i c a n t l y d i f f e r e n t .

I n t he cu r ren t r n i g ran t sys tem, womenrs pos i t i on i s i nnany lJays even worse than nenrs . Women are forb idden torn ig ra te by t he l ega l sys tem, bu t l e f t a l one i n t he v i l l agethey mus t make dec i s i ons w i t hou t be ing g ran ted t he au tonomyto do so. r rThe South Af r ican government , the Lesothogovernment and male Basotho at t i tudes have openly conspi redto p reven t f ema le rn i g ra t i on , wh i ch t h rea tens t he d i v i ded -fan i ly system on which both the migratory labor system andma le domes t i c power a re based (Cop lan 1 -987 : 424 ) . t l Fema Iepoets are among those who have managed to escape thesecons t ra i n t s and have rn i g ra ted i l l ega l l y . Wh i l e f o r men Sou thA f r i ca i s unequ i voca l l y a l and o f v /age s l ave ry , f o r t hesemigrant women i t represents re la t ive cho ice, oppor tun i ty andautonomy. Women have borrowed the menrs genre but havet rans fo rned i t , p rov id i ng a cons ide rab l y more rad i ca l soc ia l

I

rI

Page 24: Susan Gal 1. Introduction - Linguistic Society of …...Susan Gal 1. Introduction The historic silence of women in public life, and womenrs atternpts to gain a voice in politics and

2 4

c r i t i q u e . R a t h e r t h a n i d e n t i f y i n g w i t h r u r a l I i f e , t h ew o m e n r s p o e t r y s h a r p l y a n d e x p l i c i l t y c r i t i c i z e s m e n ,p roc la ims t r ad i t i ona l r na r r i age unworkab le , bu t r ecogn i zes asw e l I t h e p h y s i c a l d a n g e r s a n d i n s e c u r i t y o f I i f e a s a ni l l e g a l m i g r a n t . T h e w o m e n r s o p p o s i t i o n i s p a l p a b l e n o t o n l yi n t he con ten t o f t he poe t r y , bu t a l so du r i ng t he pe r fo rmanceo f t h e p o e m s / s o n g s i n t h e t a v e r n : r r M a l e . . . p a t r o n s , s t u n g b yt h e c r i t i c a l b a r b s o f f e m a l e p e r f o r m e r s r o u t i n e l y r i s e t os i n g s p o n t a n e o u s r e t o r t s . . . t b u t l a r e s h o u t e d d o w n o r e v e np u s h e d a s i d e b y I f e m a l e p o e t s ] d e t e r m i n e d t o h o l d t h e f l o o r ,( Cop lan 1987 z 429 ) . t l

Such a t t emp ts t o s i l ence t he p ro tes t songs o f m ig ran twomen i n Leso tho re tu rn us t o t he p rocess by wh i ch women a rerende red r rmu te r r o r a re ab le t o cons t ruc t an a l t e rna ted i s c o u r s e , r e s i s t i n g a t t e m p t s t o s u p p r e s s i t . I havea t t e rnp ted one app roach t o t h i s ques t i on , exam in ing womenrsg e n r e s a s p r a c t i c e s , a n a l y z i n g e t h n o g r a p h i c i n t e r v i e w s o rBedou in poe t r y ve ry much as I d i d ea r l i e r examp les o f r rways

o f s p e a k i n g " s u c h a s c o l l a b o r a t i v e r r f I o o r s r r a n d g o s s i p :f ocus ing on t he i r nmed ia te i n te rac t i ona l con tex t o f t he gen re

the pa r t i c i pan t s t r uc tu re o f t he i n te r v i ew , t he i n t i r nacyo f B e d o u i n c o n f i d a n t e s , t h e I i m i n a l i t y o f b o r d e r t a v e r n s - -f o r c l ues t o t he f o r ces t ha t a l l ow i t t o be pe r fo rmed . Moreb road l y , howeve r , t he i ssue o f when and how wonen r ssubve rs ion o r oppos i t i on t o hegemon ic cu l t u re emerges i s asmuch a guest ion about the s t ructure o f gender systems andpo l i t i ca l economy as abou t l i ngu i s t i c p rac t i ces , gen res andcoun te r -d i scou rses . Comparat ive work , such as Warren andB o u r g u e r s ( 1 9 8 5 ) s t u d y o f w o m e n r s p u b l i c s p e a k i n g i n t w oqu i t e d i f f e ren t l y o rgan i zed Pe ruv ian commun i t i es , oF s tudy o ft h e s o c i a l i d e n t i t i e s o f w o m e n w h o s i n g l i f e l a , c a n s t a r t t oi l l um ina te t h i s i s sue , dS can h i s to r i ca l r esea rch i n toc h a n g i n g i m a g e s o f s e x a n d g e n d e r ( S t e e d m a n e t a l . L 9 8 5 ,Wa lkow i t z 1986 ) . Ano the r r esea rch t ac t i c i s t o compare v /omeno f d i f f e r e n t c l a s s e s a n d e t h n i c g r o u p s , u s i n g I i n g u i s t i cp rac t i ces t o ra i se t he c l ass i c i s sue o f t he re l a t i onsh ipbe tween consc iousness and soc ia l pos i t i on .

A s t u d y o f t h i s k i n d i s M a r t i n ' s i n v e s t i g a t i o n o fAmer i can $ /omenrs d i scou rse abou t t he i r own rep roduc t i vep rocesses , as compared t o t he dom inan t d i scou rse on t h i ss u b j e c t , w h i c h i s m e d i c a l s c i e n c e . M a r t i n ( 1 9 8 7 ) u s e d t h esame I i ngu i s t i c me t r i c t o compare ned i ca l t ex tbooks andwonen rs f o l k mode l s : t he sys tem o f me tapho rs t h rough wh i chrea l i t y i s made co rn rephens ib l e and mean ing fu l i n each . Shedemons t ra tes t ha t med i ca l t ex t s cons t ruc t t he body as a mode lo f i ndus t r i a l soc ie t y , w i t h ce lLs as f ac to r i es hav ing sys temsof management and cont ro l .

I

The phys ica l events o f

Page 25: Susan Gal 1. Introduction - Linguistic Society of …...Susan Gal 1. Introduction The historic silence of women in public life, and womenrs atternpts to gain a voice in politics and

r--;1f . .

mens t rua t i on a re cons t ruc tedand an a la rm ing b reakdown o f

2 5

b y s c i e n c e a s f a i l e d p r o d u c t i o nau tho r i t y i n t he body .

Conpa r i ng t h i s sys tem o f me tapho rs t o womenrs ways o ft a l k i ng abou t mens t rua t i on i n i n te r v i ews , Mar t i n f ound t ha tm idd le c l ass women acqu iesce t o t he med i ca l node l . Theyexp la in rnens t rua t i on i n r ned i ca l t e rms , dwe l l i ng on i n te rnaLo rgans and p rocesses , wo r r y i ng abou t t he r r co r rec t r r co lo r o ft he b lood . Bu t wo rk ing c l ass women , bo th b lack and wh i t e ,sha red i l an absoLu te re l uc tance t o g i ve t he rned i ca l v i ew o fm e n s t r u a t i o n ( L 9 8 7 : L 0 9 ) , " i n s p i t e o f e x p o s u r e t o i t a tschoo l , and t he i n te r v i ewers r many e f f o r t s t o e l i c i t i t .I ns tead , wo rk ing c l ass women desc r i bed mens t rua t i on i nphenomeno log i ca l t e rms un touched by t he rned i ca l mode l : wha ti t f e e l s I i k e , l o o k s I i k e , s m e l l s l i k e i n i r n m e d i a t eexpe r i ence . Mar t i n conc ludes t ha t r r . . . n r i dd le c l ass womenappea r much more t r nys t i f i ed t by t he gene ra l cu l t u ra l mode l sthan wo rk ing c l ass women . They have bough t t he rned i ca la c c o u n t s , ( L 9 8 7 : 1 1 1 ) . I ' Pe rhaps t h i s i s due t o t he i rf avo rab le oppo r tun i t i es f o r sa t i s f y i ng emp loymen t and t huspos i t i ve a t t i t udes t owards bo th t he image o f p roduc t i on andschoo l i ng as a sou rce o f i n fo rma t i on . once aga in , gende r andc lass a re i n te r tw ined . Th i s i s ce r ta i n l y a s ta r t t owa rdsunders tanding the processes by which some women but noto the rs deve lop d i ve rgen t and res i s tan t consc iousnesq ; o r l t hysubo rd ina te rnen some t imes sha re women ts p rac t i ces . l - 8

These d i ve rse exa rnp les o f womenrs gen res , d rawn f r ommany pa r t s o f t he wo r1d , and many k i nds o f soc iopo l i t i ca lf onna t i ons , we re chosen i n pa r t t o h i gh l i gh t t ha t womenrsres i s tance o r c r i t i c i sm i s some t i r nes couched i n imp l i c i tforms such as ambigu i ty and i rony, but in o ther cases muchno re d i r ec t l y exp ressed . f ndeed , t he examp les i l l u s t ra te ar a n g e o f l i n g u i s t i c e x p l i c i t n e s s ( g e s t u r a l ; b r i e f a n da m b i g u o u s ; e x t e n d e d a n d e x p l i c i t ) ; d i v e r s e s o c i a l c o n t e x t s(pub l i c de rnons t ra t i on , c l osed mee t i ng , i n t ima te conve rsa t i on ,p a i d p e r f o r m a n c e ) ; a n d s e v e r a l l e v e l s o f s u b v e r s i o n o ro p p o s i t i o n t o d o m i n a n t d i s c o u r s e s ( f r o r n s e l f - d e f e a t i n gc o n p l i c i t y , t o r e s i s t a n c e , t o o p e n c r i t i c i s m ) . f n t e r e s t i n g l y ,i t seems tha t t hese t h ree pa rame te rs do no t co r re l a te i n anys i n p l e w a y . S t r o n g p r o t e s t c a n a p p e a r i n s i l e n t g e s t u r e s , a si n t h e w o m e n r s w a r ; o r i n t h e e x p l i c i t p u b l i c p e r f o r m a n c e s o fc r i t i c a l p o e t r y . R e s i s t a n c e m a y b e k n o w i n g y e t s i l e n t , d s i nAmer i can wo rk ing c l ass womenr s re fusa l - o f some med i ca lme tapho rs , ve rba l ye t ve i l ed as i n Bedou in poe t r y , ve rba l bu tp r i v a t e l y e x p r e s s e d , a s i n t h e M e n r s a n d W o m e n r s C I u b , o re x p l i c i t a n d p u b l i c , a s i n b i l i n g u a l A u s t r i a n w o m e n r s u s e o fG e r r n a n . B u t i n e a c h c a s e , w o m e n t s l i n g u i s t i c p r a c t i c e s m a d ev i s i b l e a c r a c k , a f a u l t l i n e i n t h e d o m i n a n t m a l e d i s c o u r s e

I

Page 26: Susan Gal 1. Introduction - Linguistic Society of …...Susan Gal 1. Introduction The historic silence of women in public life, and womenrs atternpts to gain a voice in politics and

2 6

o f gende r and power , r evea l i ng i t t o be no t mono l " i t h i c bu tc o n t r a d i c t o r y a n d t h u s v u l n e r a b l e .

5 . C o n c L u s i o n s

I have a rgued tha t gende r re l a t i ons a re cons t ruc ted , i np a r t , t h r o u g h d i f f e r e n t p o s s i b i L i t i e s o f e x p r e s s i o n f o r m e nand women . Too l s f r om seve ra l scho la r l y t r ad i t i ons a reneeded i n o rde r t o un rave l how I i ngu i s t i c p rac t i ces , gende rand power a re i n te r tw ined . The resea rch resu l t s f r om seve ra lt r ad i t i ons t ha t I have b rough t t oge the r he re c l a r i f y andi n f o r r n e a c h o t h e r ; t h e y d e s e r v e t o b e c o n c e p t u a l l yi n t e g r a t e d . T h e n o t i o n o f s y m b o J . i c d o m i n a t i o n t h r o u g hpa t te rns o f l anguage use , and o f gende r as bo th s t ruc tu re andp r a c t i c e , a r e e s s e n t i a l t o t h a t e n d e a v o u r .

C u l t u r a l c o n s t r u c t i o n s o f l a n g u a g e , g e n d e r a n d p o w e rs h a p e m e n r s a n d w o m e n r s i d e a s a n d i d e a l s a b o u t t h e i r o w nl i ngu i s t i c p rac t i ces . S tuden ts o f eve ryday t a l k have o f t enn e g l e c t e d t h i s s y m b o l i c s i d e o f i n t e r a c t i o n . F o r i n s t a n c e ,e v e n s u c h s e e m i n g l y s m a 1 l d e t a i l s a s t h e s y s t e m a t i cd i f f e r e n c e s b e t w e e n A m e r i c a n b o y s r a n d g i r l s t t u r n - t a k i n g i ns i ng le - sex p lay g roups f i t and re i n fo r ce t he b road cu l t u ra ll og i c o f gende r symbo l i s rn i n t he Un i t ed S ta tes . Howeve r ,womenrs acqu iescence t o such cu l t u ra l expec ta t i ons i s ne i t he rpass i ve no r au toma t i c . f ndeed , ds s tuden ts o f eve ryday t a l khave shown , women ac t i ve l y cons t ruc t l i ngu i s t i c s t r a teg ies i nresponse t o t hese cu l t u ra l concep t i ons and t o t he re l a t i onso f gende r i negua l i t y t hey encode , Wh i l e womenrs p rac t i cessome t imes b r i ng change i n es tab l i shed s t ruc tu res , o f t en , dSin t he case o f Span i sh womenrs goss ip , t he s t ra tegy nay a i r nto res i s t ma le do rn inance , bu t ends by rep roduc ing andleg i t i r na t i ng i t . Th i s i s i n pa r t because nen and womenin te rac t no t as i nd i v i duaLs , bu t i n i ns t i t u t i ons such asworkp laces , f a rn i l i es , schoo l s and po l i t i ca l f o rums , whe remuch dec i s i on -mak ing abou t r esou rces , and soc ia l se lec t i onfo r mob i l i t y , occu rs t h rough taLk . And i ns t i t u t i ons a re f a rf r om neu t ra l , a renas : t hey a re s t ruc tu red a long gende r l i nes ,t o l end au tho r i t y no t on l y t o re i gn ing c l asses and e thn i cg r o u p s , b u t s p e c i f i c a l l y t o m e n r s l i n g u i s t i c p r a c t i c e s .

Bu t power i s more t han an au tho r j - t a t i ve vo i ce i ndec i s i on -mak ing ; i t s s t r onges t f o rm may weL l be t he ab i l i t yt o d e f i n e s o c i a l r e a l i t y , t o i m p o s e v i s i o n s o f t h e w o r l d .Such v i s i ons a re i nsc r i bed i n l anguage and enac ted i ni n t e r a c t i o n . A l t h o u g h w o m e n r s e v e r y d a y t a l k a n d w o m e n r sr r vo i ce r r o r consc iousness as ev idenced i n exp ress i ve gen reshave been s tud ied qu i t e sepa ra te l y , I have a rgued tha t bo thc a n b e u n d e r s t o o d a s s t r a t e g i c r e s p o n s e s , o f t e n o f

I

Page 27: Susan Gal 1. Introduction - Linguistic Society of …...Susan Gal 1. Introduction The historic silence of women in public life, and womenrs atternpts to gain a voice in politics and

2 1

r e s i s t a n c e , t o d o m i n a n t , h e g e m o n i c c u l t u r a l f o r m s . O f t e n t h ef o r m i s a c u l t u r a l l y d e f i n e d o p p o s i t e , a s w e L l a s t h ei d e o l o g y . T h u s , a t t e n t i o n t o l i n g u i s t i c d e t a i l , c o n t e x t o fpe r fo rmance , and t he na tu re o f t he dom inan t f o rms i sessen t i a l t o bo th endeavo rs . The p rec i se f o rm o f ques t i onsand tu rn - t ak ing i s c ruc ia l i n unde rs tand ing t he cons t ruc t i ono f d i f f e r e n t r r f l o o r s r r i n A m e r i c a n m e e t i n g s ( e v e r y d a y t a l k ) ;t he exac t , f o rma l conven t i ons o f i n t ima te Bedou in poe t r y(exp ress i ve gen re ) i nd i spensab le f o r unde rs tand ing how i t i ssu i t ed t o t he exp ress ion o f vu lne rab i l i t y and dependence .A l t hough the I i ngu i s t i c ma te r i a l s a re qu i t e d i f f e ren t , bo thc o l l a b o r a t i v e r r f l o o r s r r a n d i n t i r n a t e p o e t r y l o c a t e acon t rad i c t i on i n dom inan t d i scou rse and subve r t i t t h roughr i va l p rac t i ces . One unde rm ines t he h iea rch i ca l f o rm andi d e o l o g y o f m e e t i n g s w h i c h f a v o r m e n r s e x p e r t i s e i nconpe t i t i ve t a l k ; t he o the r i s t he oppos i t e o f o rd ina ry t a l kand unde rm ines t he cu l t u ra l r u l e o f hono r , t h rea ten ing t or e v e a l t h e i l l e g i t m a c y o f e l d e r m e n r s a u t h o r i t y . T h i sre tu rns us t o t he cu l t u ra l cons t ruc t i ons we s ta r t ed w i t h , nowrevea led no t on l y as i deas t ha t d i f f e ren t i a te t he gende rs ,bu t as d i scou rses t ha t a re sou rces o f power , wh i ch a reenac ted , and some t imes con tes ted , i n t a1k .

I

Page 28: Susan Gal 1. Introduction - Linguistic Society of …...Susan Gal 1. Introduction The historic silence of women in public life, and womenrs atternpts to gain a voice in politics and

2B

NOTES

1 . T h i s p a p e r w i l l a p p e a r i n a d i f f e r e n t f o r m i n G e n d e r .C u l t u r e . a n d P o I i t i c a I E c o m o n y , M i c a e l a d i L e o n a r d o ( e d . )U n i v e r s i t y o f C a l i f o r n i a P r e s s . f w o u l d L i k e t o t h a n k

" T u d i t h G e r s o n , S u z a n n e L e b s o c k , M i c h a e l M o f f a t t , K i tW o o l a r d a n d V i v i a n a Z e : . i z e r f o r c a r e f u l r e a d i n g s a n di m p o r t a n t c o m m e n t s , a n d B a r n b i s c h i e f f e l i n f o r h e rb i b l i o g r a p h i c s u g g e s t i o n s . T h i s p a p e r i s d e d i c a t e d t o t h ememory o f Ru th Bo rke r .

2 . T h e q u e s t i o n o f t r s i l e n c e t f i n f e m i n i s t s c h o l a r s h i p i st w o - f o l d . O n t h e o n e h a n d , t h e t i t l e s o f s o m e r e c e n t b o o k ss u f f i c e t o i l l u s t r a t e a c o n c e r n w i t h o b s t a c l e s t o w o m e n r ss e l f - e x p r e s s i o n : S i l e n c e s ( O l s e n ) , O n 1 i e s , s e c r e t s a n ds i l e n c e ( R i c h ) , S t e a l i n g t h e l a n q u a q e ( O s t r i k e r ) , M a n m a d el a n g u a g e ( S p e n d e r ) . o n t h e o t h e r h a n d , t h e f a c t t h a t s o c i a Lsc ience has neg lec ted women makes women o f t he pas t ando t h e r c u l t u r e s s e e m s i l e n t , w h e n i n f a c t t h e s i l e n c e i st h a t o f c u r r e n t w e s t e r n s c h o l a r s h i p . I r e t u r n t o t h i s i s s u ei n s e c t i o n 4 . E v e n e v e r y d a y u s a g e , s u c h a s t h e g e n e r i c r h e lf o r p e r s o n s o f u n s p e c i f i e d s e x , h a s t h e e f f e c t o f n a k i n gw o m e n a p p e a r s i l e n t .

3 . T h e r e i s a g r o w i n g I i t e r a t u r e o n t h e m e a n i n g s o fs i l e n c e , w h i c h i s u s e f u l l y r e v i e w e d i n T a n n e n , D . a n dS a v i l l e - T r o i k e ( 1 9 8 4 ) . T h e r e l a t i o n s h i p o f s i l e n c e t owomenrs speech i s men t i oned i n Tho rne , K ramarae and Hen ley( 1 9 8 3 : 1 6 - 1 7 ) . S m i t h , S . ( 1 - 9 8 7 : 4 9 ) h i g h l i g h t s t h e i r o n y o fF o u c a u l t t s a s s e r t i o n s , w h e n a p p l i e d t o w o r n e n r s w r i t i n g ; M o i( L 9 8 5 ) d i s c u s s e s f e m i n i n i t y a n d s i l e n c e f r o m a I i t e r a r yc r i t i c a l p e r s p e c t i v e .

4 . Among the i n f l uen t i a l wo rks t ha t have deve loped anda r g u e d f o r t h i s c o n c e p t i o n a r e : R u b i n 7 9 7 5 , K e l l y - G a d o lI 9 7 6 , G e r s o n a n d P e i s s 1 9 8 5 , C o n n e l I 1 9 8 7 .

5 . Among such wo rks , pe rhaps t he bes t - known evoca t i on o fI t w o m e n I s v o i c e r r i s G i l l i g a n ( L 9 8 2 ) , a n d t h e l i t e r a t u r ei n s p i r e d b y i t . A l s o r e l e v a n t h e r e a r e h i s t o r i a n s I

d i s c u s s i o n s o f w o m e n r s c u l t u r e t h a t s t r e s s t h e c o n t e n t o fb e l i e f s a n d v a l u e s , ( f o r e x a m p l e , S m i t h - R o s e n b e r g 1 9 8 5 ; s e ed e b a t e i n F e m i n i s t S t u d i e s 1 9 B O ) .

I

Page 29: Susan Gal 1. Introduction - Linguistic Society of …...Susan Gal 1. Introduction The historic silence of women in public life, and womenrs atternpts to gain a voice in politics and

t v

6 . L e a r s ( 1 9 8 5 ) p r o v i d e s a n e x c e l l e n t d i s c u s s i o n o fG r a r n s c i ' s c o n t r i b u t i o n a n d t h e a n a l y t i c a l u s e s o f t c u l t u r a l

h e g e m o n y ' ; s e e a l s o L u k e s ( 1 9 7 4 ) . f h a v e p o i n t e d t o a v e r ygene ra ) - and f undamen ta l conce rn t ha t t hese t heo r i s t s sha re ,i g n o r i n g f o r r n y p u r p o s e s t h e i r m a n y d i f f e r e n c e s , e . 9 . t h ere la t i ve impo r tance o f h i s to r y and human agency as opposedt o s t r u c t u r e , o r h o w t o c o n c e p t u a l i z e t h e r e l a t i o n s h i pbe tween ma te r i a l and i dea t i ona l f o r ces .

7 . F e n i n i s t l i t e r a r y c r i t i c s h a v e p r o v i d e d d i v e r s eana l yses o f t h i s r e l a t i onsh ip , see Fu rman ( l - 9 I0 ) and Mo i ' s( l - 9 8 5 ) c r i t i c a l r e v i e w . R e c e n t w e s t e r n f e m i n i s t p r a c t i c ei t se l f p rov ides a handy exa rnp le i n consc iousness ra i s i ng ,w h i c h i s a n e w f o r m o f l i n g u i s t i c p r a c t i c e a s w e l l a s acha l l enge t o dom inan t de f i n i t i ons abou t gende r . Sec t i on 4d i s c u s s e s t h e a n t h r o p o l o g i c a l e v i d e n c e .

8 . B o r k e r ( 1 9 8 0 ) m a k e s t h i s p o i n t , a n d p r o v i d e s m a n ye x a m p l e s , s o m e o f w h i c h a r e a l s o c i t e d h e r e . H y m e s ( e . 9 .1 , 9 7 4 ) h a s l o n g a r g u e d f o r t h e a n a l y s i s o f s p e a k e r s r i d e a sabou t speak ing and i t s r e l a t i on t o soc iaL ca tego r i es .S i l v e r s t e i n ( 1 9 8 5 ) p r o v i d e s a d e t a i l e d d i s c u s s i o n o f t h eway such concep t i ons , a l ong r w i t h cu l t u ra l l y cons t ruc tedn o t i o n s a b o u t h o w l a n g u a g e w o r k s , i . e . t l i n g u i s t i c

i deo logy , t r ned ia te be tween soc ia l change and changes i n t hein te rna l wo rk ings o f l anguage , e .g . phono logy , add resssysterns, morphology.

9 . L i ngu i s t i c t heo ry has been more deep l y i nvo l ved w i t hde f i n i t i ons o f gende r t han i s gene ra l l y r ecogn i zed . Cameron( 1 9 8 5 ) p r o v i d e s a u s e f u l d i s c u s s i o n o f t h e w a y n o t i o n s o fgende r o r i g i na l l y d rawn f r om de f i n i t i ons o f men and womenwere used t o de f i ne g rammat i ca l gende r , t hen I a te r r ecyc ledf ron l anguage to soc ia l I i f e and used t o j us t i f y gende rar rangements .

1 0 . S u c h a g e n d e r / c L a s s l i n k i s s u g g e s t e d , i n p a s s i t g , i na nunbe r o f wo rks . Fo r exa rnp le , t he re l a t i onsh ip be tweenw o r k i n g c l a s s c u l t u r e a n d m a s c u l i n i t y i s d e s c r i b e d f o rB r i t i s h a d o l e s c e n t s b y W i I I i s ( L 9 7 7 ) a n d e x t e n d e d t o a d u l t sb y C o n n e l l ( 1 9 8 7 : 1 0 9 ) . T h e c o n n e c t i o n b e t w e e n i m a g e s o ff e m i n i n i t y a n d n i d d l e c l a s s g e n t i l i t y i n 1 9 t h A m e r i c a i ss u g g e s t e d b y H a l t t u n e n ( L 9 8 2 ) a n d D o u g l a s ( L 9 7 7 ) . S m i t h -R o s e n b e r g ( 1 9 8 5 ) d i s c u s s e s D a v y C r o c k e t t a s t h e p o o r ,t ough , r uncu l t u red r a r che type o f Amer i can rnascu l i n i t y ,a l ong w i t h o the r , con t ras t i ng images o f gende r i n t he Lg thcentury .

I

Page 30: Susan Gal 1. Introduction - Linguistic Society of …...Susan Gal 1. Introduction The historic silence of women in public life, and womenrs atternpts to gain a voice in politics and

3 0

1 1 . I w i I I n o t b e d i s c u s s i n g a r a n g e o f i m p o r t a n t , r e l a t e di s s u e s t h a t a r e c r i t i c a l l y r e v i e w e d b y M c C o n n e l I - G i n e t( 1 9 8 8 ) , e . g . t h e p r o c e s s b y w h i c h s p e e c h s t r a t e g i e s b e c o m epar t o f l anquage as a f o rm o f cogn i t i ve compe tence , and t heseman t i c cod ing o f gende r i nequa f i t y i n t he l ex i con , among lo t h e r s .

l - 2 . Such s t ra teg i c l anguage cho i ces , assoc ia ted w i t h t hed i f f e r e n t i a l l i f e c i r c u m s t a n c e s o f m e n a n d w o m e n i nb i l i ngua l commun i t i es , have been repo r ted by seve ra lresea rche rs . The cho i ces o f women va ry acco rd ing t o t hes p e c i f i c h i s t o r i c a l a n d p o l i t i c a l e c o n o m i c c i r c u m s t a n c e s o fthe communi ty , So that women are somet imes conservers o fe thn i c l anguages , and some t imes l eade rs i n t he sh i f t awayf rom thern.

13 . Thes pa t t e rns o f i n te r rup t i on have been ques t i oned bysome worke rs , and dese rve more s tudy , espec ia l l y wo rk t ha ti s a t t uned t o con tex tua l d i f f e rences i n eve ryday t a l k .

14 . A re l a ted app roach f ocuses on a d i f f e ren t con tex t :I anguage soc ia l i za t i on . r r npo r tan t l y , i t i s no t on l y t hech i l d bu t a l so t he ca reg i ve r whose i den t i t y i s de f i ned i nsuch i n te rac t i on (Ochs , f o r t hcom ing ) . f n a compar i son o fSamoan and rn i dd le - c l ass Amer i can pa t t e rns , Ochs f ound tha tAmer i can ca reg i ve rs (usua l l y mo the rs ) accommoda te much moret o c h i l d r e n , b o t h v e r b a l l y a n d n o n - v e r b a l l y ; i n d e e d , t h en idd le - c l ass image o f t he r rgood mo the r r r r equ i res t h i s . Fo ri ns tance , t hey rou t i ne l y r e i n te rp re t speech and ac t i on t ha ta r e j o i n t a c t i v i t i e s o f m o t h e r a n d c h i l d a s t h ep ra i sewor thy accomp l i shmen t o f t he ch i l d a l one . Th i s no ton ly const ructs the ch i ld as more conpetent than he or sherea l l y i s , bu t a l so se rves t o deny o r ve i l t he g rea te rknow ledge and power o f t he (o f t en f ema le ) ca reg i ve r .Ane r i can no t i ons abou t gende r and ch i l dhood a re t hus I i nkedand reproduced.

15 . I n te rac t i ons i n many o the r i ns t i t u t i ons dese rve morea t t en t i on i n t hese t e rms . Fo r a recen t a t t enp t t ounde rs tand i n te rac t i ons be tween women pa t i en t s and doc to rsi n A m e r i c a n c l i n i c s s e e F i s c h e r l - 9 8 8 . F o r s u g g e s t i v ed i s c u s s i o n o f e d u c a t i o n a l r e f o r m b a s e d o n s i m i l a r i d e a s ,s e e T r e i c h l e r a n d K r a m a r a e ( 1 9 8 3 ) , a n d t h e v e r y d i f f e r e n ta p p r o a c h o f W a l k e r d i n e ( 1 9 8 5 ) .

I

Page 31: Susan Gal 1. Introduction - Linguistic Society of …...Susan Gal 1. Introduction The historic silence of women in public life, and womenrs atternpts to gain a voice in politics and

J 1

1 6 . T h e A r d e n e r s r t h e s i s i s m o r e c o m p l e x , b u t t h e p a r t s Ihave summar i zed have had s t rong i n f l uence no t on l y on t heA r d e n e r r s o w n c i r c l e ( s e e a r t i c l e s i n A r d e n e r L 9 i 5 ) b u ta l s o o n o t h e r f e m i n i s t w r i t e r s s u c h a s S h o w a l t e r , K r a m a r a e ,S p e n d e r , a n d W a r r e n a n d B o u r q u e ( 1 9 8 5 ) .

L7 . Many scho la rs a rgue t ha t t he wes te rn gen re o fa u t o b i o g r a p h y a r o s e i n t h e l a t e M i d d l e A g e s , i n t h e m i d s to f p r o f o u n d l y r e f o r m u l a t e d n o t i o n s o f i n d i v i d u a l i s m a n d i t sr e l a t i o n t o t h e m o v e m e n t o f h i s t o r y ( O l n e y , 1 9 8 0 , S t a n t o nL987 ) . Because t hese no t i ons o f t he new t rMan r r assumed an a l e s u b j e c t , w o m e n r s a u t o b i o g r a p h i e s i n t h e W e s t h a v eo f ten been pe rce i ved as i l l eg i t ima te and suspec t (Sm i th1 .987 : 4 3 ) . Kwa io womenr s re fusaL t o rec i t e t he pe rsona ln a r r a t i v e s a n d s o c i e t a L r u l e s c h a r a c t e r i s t i c o f m e n r sr e s p o n s e s t o s i r n i l a r e t h n o g r a p h i c q u e s t i o n s , t h e i ri ns i s tance i ns tead on mora l j us t i f i ca t i ons o f womanhood ,e v o k e a p a r a I I e I s t r a t e g y i n W e s t e r n w o m e n r sau tob iog raph ies , i n wh i ch a recu r r i ng f i gu re o f d i v i dedconsc iousness can be read as t he au tho rs r awareness t ha tt hey a re be ing read as women and t hus j udged d i f f e ren t l y i nt h e i r s e l f c o n s t r u c t i o n s ( S m i t h 1 9 8 7 ) .

18 . The ev idence abou t c l ass i s more a rnb iguous when b i r t hrne tapho rs a re a l so cons ide red . Women o f a l I c l asses (aswe I I as some doc to rs ) have i nven ted new me tapho rs f o r b i r t htha t r e j ec t t he ana logy be tween the p roduc t i on o f goods andthe p roduc t i on o f bab ies . Such new me tapho rs , essen t i a lf o r r e -o rgan i z i ng expe r i ence , have been embod ied i n t heva r i ed new i ns t i t u t i ons o f b i r t h c l i n i cs , a t -home b i r t hsand o the r womenrs hea l t h movemen ts i n t he US and Eu rope .A s M a r t i n ( l - 9 8 7 ) a r g u e s , l i n g u i s t i c p r a c t i c e s a r e n o t o n l yre f l exes o f ex i s t i ng s t ruc tu ra l ca tego r i es o f speake rs , bu ta re a l so new ly c rea ted , f o r rn i ng t he cond i t i ons necessa ry t obu i l d new i ns t i t u t i ona l s t r uc tu res .

-

Page 32: Susan Gal 1. Introduction - Linguistic Society of …...Susan Gal 1. Introduction The historic silence of women in public life, and womenrs atternpts to gain a voice in politics and

J L

REFERENCES

A b u - L u g h o d . L . 1 9 8 6 V e i I e d s e n t i r n e n t s . C a l i f o r n i a :B e r k e I e y .

A r d e n e r , E . 1 9 7 5 B e l i e f a n d t h e p r o b l e m o f w o m e n . I N S .A r d e n e r , ( e d . ) P e r c e i v i n g w o m e n . M a l a b y : L o n d o n .

A r d e n e r , S . ) , 9 7 5 I n t r o d u c t i o n . I N S . A r d e n e r ( e d . )Pe rce i v i ng wo rnen . Ma laby : London .

Asad , T . 1986 The concep t o f cu l . t u ra l t r ans la t i on i nB r i t i s h s o c i a l a n t h r o p o l o g y . I N J . C l i f f o r d a n d c .M a r c u s ( e d s . ) W r i t i n g c u l t u r e . C a l i f o r n i a :B e r k e l e y .

B a s s o , K . L 9 7 9 P o r t r a i t s o f t h e W h i t e r n a n . C a m b r i d g e : N e wY o r k .

Bauman , R . 1983 Le t you r wo rds be f ew . Cambr idge : New Yo rk .

B o r k e r , R . 1 9 8 0 A n t h r o p o l o g y . I N S . M c C o n n e l l - G i n e t , R .Bo rke r and N . Fu rman (eds . ) Language andwomen i n l i t e ra tu re and soc ie t y . P raege r :New Yo rk .

B o u r d i e u , P . ) - 9 7 7 a O u t l i n e o f a t h e o r y o f p r a c t i c e .C a n b r i d g e : N e w Y o r k .

Bou rd ieu , p " J -977b The econo rn i cs o f l i ngu i s t i c exchanges .S o c i a I S c i e n c e f n f o r m a t i o n 1 6 : 6 : 6 4 5 - 6 8 .

B r e n n e i s , D . L . a n d M y e r s , F . L 9 B 4 D a n q e r o u s w o r d s . N Y U : N e wY o r k .

B rown , P . 1 ,980 How and why a re women more po l i t e : So rneev idence f r om a Mayan commun i t y . IN S .MacConne l l -G ine t , R . Bo rke r and N . Fu rman(eds . ) Wornen and l anquage i n I i t e ra tu re_and soc ie t y . P raege r : New Yo rk ,

C a m e r o n , D . 1 9 8 5 F e r n i n i s r n a n d l i n g u i s t i c t h e o r v . S t .M a r t i n r s : N e w Y o r k .

C l i f f o r d , J . a n d c . M a r c u s ( e d s . ) L 9 8 6 W r i t i n g c u l t u r e .C a l i f o r n i a : B e r k e l e y .

C o n n e l l , R . W . L 9 8 7 G e n d e r a n d p o w e r . S t a n f o r d : S t a n f o r d .

I

Page 33: Susan Gal 1. Introduction - Linguistic Society of …...Susan Gal 1. Introduction The historic silence of women in public life, and womenrs atternpts to gain a voice in politics and

3 3

c o p r a n , D . B . L 9 8 7 E r o q u e n t k n o w l e d g e : L e s o t h o m i g r a n t s 'songs and t he an th ropo logy o f expe r i ence .A m e r i c a n E t h n o l o q i s t l _ 4 : 3 : 4 1 3 - 4 3 3 .

E d e r s k y , c . 1 9 8 1 w h o s e g o t t h e f l o o r ? L a n g u a q e i n s o c i e t y1 0 : 3 : 3 8 3 - 4 2 2 .

E r i ckson , F . and J . Schu l_ t z ] - 9B2 The counse lo r asqa tekeepe r . Academic : New yo rk .

F i s h e r , s . 1 9 8 8 r n t h e p a t i e n t r s b e s t i n t e r e s t . R u t g e r s : N e wBrunsw ick .

F i s h m a n , P . l 9 7 B r n t e r a c t i o n : T h e w o r k w o m e n d o . s o c i a rP r o b l e r n s 2 5 : 4 i 3 9 7 - 4 0 6 .

F u r r n a n , N . l - 9 8 0 T e x t u a l f e m i n i s m . r N s . M c c o n n e r l - G i n e t ,R . Bo rke r and N . Fu rman (eds . ) Women andl a n g u a g e i n l i t e r a t u r e a n d s o c i e t y .P r a e g e r : N e w Y o r k .

F o u c a u l t , M . r 9 7 B T h e h i s t o r v o f s e x u a l i t y v o r . 1 . p a n t h e o n :New yo rk .

Foucau r t , M . l - 980 power / know ledge : se rec ted i n te r v i ews ando t h e r w r i t i n g s . C o I i n G o r d o n ( e d . ) .Pan theon : New yo rk .

G a r , s . L 9 7 8 P e a s a n t m e n c a n r t g e t w i v e s : L a n g u a g e a n d s e xr o l e s i n a b i l i n g u a t c o m m u n i t y . L a n g u i g e -i n S o c i e t y 7 z I : 1 - 1 7 .

G e r s o n , J . a n d P e i s s , K . 1 9 8 5 B o u n d a r i e s , n e g o t i a t i o n ,consc iousness : Reconcep tua l i z i ng gende rr e l a t i o n s . S o c i a l p r o b l e m s 3 2 : 4 2 3 1 - 7 - 3 3 1 .

G i l r i g a n , c . L 9 8 2 J n a d i f f e r e n t v o i c e . H a r v a r d : c a m b r i d g e ,M a s s .

G o o d w i n , M . a n d G o o d w i n , c . r 9 g 7 c h i l d r e n ' s a r g u i n g . r N s .P h i l i p s , S . S t e e l e a n d C . T a n z ( e d s . )Lanquage . gende r and sex i n co rnpa ra t i vep e r s p e c t i v e . C a m b r i d g e : N e w y o r k .

G u m p e r z , J . ] - 9 8 2 D i s c o u r s e s t r a t e g i e s . c a m b r i d g e : N e w y o r k .

H a r d i n g , s . L 9 7 s w o m e n a n d w o r d s i n a s p a n i s h v i l l a g e . r NR . R e i t e r ( e d . ) T o w a r d a n a n t h r o p o l o g y q f\ . { omen . Mon th l y Rev i ew : New yo rk .

r

Page 34: Susan Gal 1. Introduction - Linguistic Society of …...Susan Gal 1. Introduction The historic silence of women in public life, and womenrs atternpts to gain a voice in politics and

3 4

H a r r i s , O . 1 9 8 0 T h e p o w e r o f s i g n s : G e n d e r , c u l t u r e a n d t h ew i l d i n t h e B o l i v i a n A n d e s . I N c .M a c C o r m a c k a n d M . S t r a t h e r n ( e d s . )N a t u r e , c u l t u r e a n d g e n d e r . C a m b r i d g e :N e w Y o r k .

H a r t t u n e n , K . 1 - 9 B Z C o n f i d e n c e m e n a n d p a i n t e d w o m e n . Y a I e :N e w H a v e n .

H e a t h , S . 1 9 8 3 W a v s w i t h w o r d s . C a m b r i d g e : N e w Y o r k .

H e r z f e l d , M . 1 9 8 5 T h e p o e t i c s o f m a n h o o d . P r i n c e t o n :P r i nce ton .

H y m e s , D . I 9 7 4 F o u d a t i o n s i n s o c i o l i n g u i s t i c s . P e n n s y l v a n i a :P h i I a d e 1 p h i a .

I f e k a - M o l l e r , C . ) , 9 7 5 F e m a l e m i l i t a n c y a n d c o l o n i a l r e v o l t :T h e W o n e n r s W a r o f L 9 2 9 , E a s t e r n N i g e r i a .I N S . A r d e n e r ( e d . ) P e r c e i v i n g w o m e n .M a l a b y : L o n d o n .

I r v i ne , J . L979 Fo rma l i t y and i n fo rma l i t y i n commun ica t i vee v e n t s . A r n e r i c a n A n t h r o p o l o g i s t B L : 7 7 9 -7 9 0 .

J o r d a n , R . A . a n d F . A . D e C a r o 1 9 8 6 W o m e n a n d t h e s t u d y o ff o l k l o r e . S i g n s 1 1 : 3 : 5 0 0 - 5 1 8 .

K e e n a n , E . L 9 7 4 N o r n - m a k e r s a n d n o r m - b r e a k e r s : U s e s o fspeech by rnen and women in a Malagasyc o m m u n i t y . I N R . B a u m a n a n d J . S h e r z e r( e d s . ) E x p l o r a t i o n s i n t h e e t h n o g r a p h y o fspeak inq . Can rb r i dge : New Yo rk .

K e e s i . g , R . L 9 8 5 K w a i o w o m e n s p e a k : T h e r n i c r o p o l i t i c s o fau to -b iog raphy i n a So lomon f s l ands o c i e t y . A m e r i c a n A n t h r o p o l o g i s t8 7 : 1 2 2 7 - 3 9 .

K e l l y - G a d o l , J . L 9 7 6 T h e s o c i a l r e l a t i o n o f t h e s e x e s :M e t h o d o } o g i c a l i m p l i c a t i o n s o f w o m e n r sh i s t o r y . S i g n s l : B O 9 - 8 2 4 .

K r a m a r a e , C . 1 9 8 0 G e n d e r : H o w s h e s p e a k s . I N E . B . R y a n a n dH . G i l e s ( e d s " ) A t t i t u d e s t o w a r d sl a n g u a q e v a r i a t i o n . E d w a r d A r n o l d :London .

I

Page 35: Susan Gal 1. Introduction - Linguistic Society of …...Susan Gal 1. Introduction The historic silence of women in public life, and womenrs atternpts to gain a voice in politics and

I?

3 5

L a b o v , W . L 9 7 4 S o c i o l i n q u i s t i c p a t t e r n s . P e n n s y l v a n i a :P h i I a d e I p h i a .

L e a r s , J . 1 9 8 5 T h e c o n c e p t o f c u l t u r a l - h e g e m o n y : P r o b l e m sa n d p o s s i b i l i t i e s . A m e r i c a n H i s t o r i c a lR e v i e w 9 0 : 5 6 7 - 5 9 3 .

Lede rman , R . 1984 Who speaks he re : Fo rma l i t y and t hep o l i t i c s o f g e n d e r i n M e n d i , H i g h l a n dP a p u a N e w G u i n e a . I N D . B r e n n e i s a n d F .M y e r s ( e d s . ) D a n g e r o u s w o r d s . N Y U : N e wYork .

L u k e s , S . L 9 7 4 P o w e r : a r a d i c a l v i e w . M a c m i l l a n : L o n d o n .

M a l t z , D . a n d R . B o r k e r I 9 B 2 A c u l t u r a l a p p r o a c h t o m a l e -f ema l -e m iscommun ica t i on . IN J . Gumperz( e d . ) L a n g u a g e a n d s o c i a l i d e n t i t v .Cambr idge : New Yo rk .

M a r t i n , E . L 9 8 7 T h e w o m a n i n t h e b o d y . B e a c o n : B o s t o n .

M c C o n n e l l - G i n e t , S . 1 9 8 8 L a n g u a g e a n d g e n d e r . f N F .Newrneye r (ed . ) L i nqu i s t i c s : t heCarnbr idge survey. Carnbr idge: New York.

M i c h a e I s , S . 1 9 8 L r t s h a r i n g t i r n e r ' : C h i l d r e n ' s n a r r a t i v es t yJ -es and d i f f e ren t i a l access t ol i t e r a c y . L a n q u a g e i n S o c i e t y 1 0 : 3 : 4 2 3 -4 4 2 -

M o i , T . 1 9 8 5 S e x u a l z t e x t u a l p o l i t i c s . M e t h u e n : L o n d o n .

O r B a r r , W . M . a n d A t k i n s B . K . r r W o m e n r s l a n g u a g e r r o rr rpower l ess l anguage t r? IN S . McConne l l -G i n e t e t a I . ( e d s . ) W o r n e n a n d l a n g u a g e i nl i t e ra tu re and soc ie t y . P raege r : NY .

Ochs , E . L987 The i npac t o f s t r a t i f i ca t i on ands o c i a l i z a t i o n o n m e n r s a n d w o m e n r s s p e e c hi n W e s t e r n S a r n o a . I N S . P h i l i p s e t a I .( eds . ) Lanc ruage . gende r and sex i nco rnpa ra t i ve pe rspec t i ve . Cambr idge : NewY o r k .

Ochs , E . f o r t hcon ing . f ndex ing gende r IN B . M i I I e r( e d . ) G e n d e r h i e r a r c h i e s .

r

Page 36: Susan Gal 1. Introduction - Linguistic Society of …...Susan Gal 1. Introduction The historic silence of women in public life, and womenrs atternpts to gain a voice in politics and

3 6

o l n e y , J . 1 9 8 0 A u t o b i o g r a p h y a n d t h e c u l t u r a r m o m e n t . r NJ . O J - n e y ( e d . ) A u t o b i o g r a p h v : e s s a y st h e o r e t i c a l a n d c r i t i c a l . p r i n c e t o n :P r i n c e t o n .

ou t ram, D . 1987 Le }angage mare de l a ve r tu : women and t hed i s c o u r s e o f t h e F r e n c h R e v o l u t i o n . I N p .B u r k e a n d R . P o r t e r ( e d s . ) T h e s o c i a lh i s t o r y o f I a n g u a g e . C a m b r i d g e : N e w y o r k .

P h i t i p s , S . 7 9 8 7 f n t r o d u c t i o n . I N S . p h i l i p s e t a l .( e d s . ) L a n g u a g e , q e n d e r a n d s e x i nc o m p a r a t i v e p e r s p e c t i v e . C a m b r i d g e : N e wy o r k .

P o I i e r , N . a n d W . R o s e b e r r y 1 9 B B T r i s t e s t r o p e s . M s . N e wS c h o o I f o r S o c i a I R e s e a r c h .

R a d w a y , J . 1 9 8 4 R e a d i n g t h e r o m a n c e . N o r t h c a r o l i n a : c h a p e rH i 1 1 .

R u b i n , G . L 9 7 5 T h e t r a f f i c i n w o m e n : N o t e s o n t h e, p o l i t i c a l e c o n o m y r o f s e x . f N R . R e i t e r(ed . ) Toward an an th ropo logy o f women .Mon th l y Rev i . ew : New yo rk .

S a t t e l , J . W . L 9 8 3 M e n , i n e x p r e s s i v e n e s s a n d p o w e r . I N B .T h o r n e , C . K r a m a r a e , N . H e n J - e y ( e d s . )Language , qende r and soc ie t y . NewburyH o u s e : R o w l e y , M a s s .

s c h i e f f e L i n , B . ] - 9 8 7 D o d i f f e r e n t w o r f d s m e a n d i f f e r e n two rds? : An examp le f r om papua New Gu inea .I N S . P h i l i p s e t a l . ( e d s . ) L a n g u a g e .gende r and sex i n compara t i vepe rspec t i ve . Cambr idge : New yo rk .

s h e r z e r , J . 1 9 8 7 A d i v e r s i t y o f v o i c e s : M e n r s a n d w o m e n r sspeech i n e thnog raph i c pe rspec t i ve . INS . P h i l i p s e t a I . ( e d s . ) L a n g u a g e . g e n d e gand sex i n co rnpa ra t i ve pe rspec t i ve .Cambr idge : New Yo rk ,

S i r v e r s t e i n , M . 1 9 8 5 L a n g u a g e a n d t h e c u r t u r e o f g e n d e r : A tt he i n te r sec t i on o f s t r uc tu re , usage andideo logy . IN E . t ( e rEz and R . pe rnen t i e r( e d s . ) S i q n s i n s o c i e t y . A c a d e r n i c : N e wY o r k .

I

Page 37: Susan Gal 1. Introduction - Linguistic Society of …...Susan Gal 1. Introduction The historic silence of women in public life, and womenrs atternpts to gain a voice in politics and

3 7

S n i t h , S . I 9 B 7 A p o e t i c s o f w o m e n ' s a u t o b i o g r a p h y .I n d i a n a : B l o o m i n g t o n .

S m i t h - R o s e n b e r g , C . 1 9 8 5 D i s o r d e r l y c o n d u c t : v i s i o n s o fg e n d e r i n V i c t o r i a n A m e r i c a . O x f o r d : N e wY o r k .

S t a n t o n , D . 1 9 8 4 A u t o g y n o g r a p h y : I s t h e s u b j e c t d i f f e r e n t ?I N D . S t a n t o n ( e d . ) T h e f e m a l e a u t o g r a p h .C h i c a g o : C h i c a g o .

S t e e d m a n , C . , U n w i n C . , a n d V . W a l k e r d i n e ( e d s . ) L 9 B 5L a n g u a g e . g e n d e r a n d c h i l d h o o d . R o u t l e d g eand Kegan Pau l : London .

T a n n e n , D . a n d M . S a v i I l e - T r o i k e ( e d s . ) 1 9 8 4 P e r s p e c t i v e s o ns i l e n c e . G e o r g e t o w n : W a s h i n g t o n D . C .

T h o r n e , B . , K r a m a r a e , C . a n d N . H e n I e y 1 9 8 3 L a n g u a g e ,gende r and soc ie t y : open ing a secondd e c a d e o f r e s e a r c h . I N B . T h o r n e e t a I .( e d s . ) L a n g u a q e , g e n d e r a n d s o c i e t v .Newbury House : Row ley , Mass .

T r e i c h l e r , P . A . a n d C . K r a m a r a e 1 9 8 3 W o m e n r s t a l k i n t h ei vo ry t ower . Commun ica t i on Oua r te r l y3 ] - : 2 : 1 1 8 - L 3 2 .

T r u d g i l 1 , P . 1 9 8 3 S e x a n d c o v e r t p r e s t i g e : L i n g u s i t i c c h a n g ei n a n u r b a n d i a l e c t o f N o r w i c h . I N J .B a u g h a n d J . S h e r z e r ( e d s . ) L a n q u a g e i nu s e . P r e n t i c e - H a l I : E n g l e w o o d C I i f f s ,N . J .

W a l k o w i t z , J . L 9 B 6 S c i e n c e , f e m i n i s n l a n d r o m a n c e : T h e M e n r sa n d W o m e n r s C l u b 1 B B 5 - 1 8 8 9 . H i s t o r yW o r k s h o p J o u r n a l S p r i n g 3 7 - 5 9 .

War ren , K , and S . Bou rque 1985 Gende r , power andcommun ica t i on : Responses t o po l i t i ca l mu t i ng i n t heA n d e s . f N S . B o u r q u e a n d D . R . D i v i n e ( e d s . ) W o m e nI i v i n q c h a n g e . T e m p l e : P h i l a d e l p h i a .

W e s t , C . a n d Z i m n e r m a n , D . 1 9 8 3 S m a I I i n s u l t s : A s t u d y o fi n te r rup t i ons i n c ross -sex conve rsa t i onsb e t w e e n u n a c q u a i n t e d p e r s o n s . I N B .T h o r n e e t a I . ( e d s . ) L a n g u a q e . g e n d e r a n ds o c i e t y . N e w b u r y H o u s e : R o w l e y .

I

Page 38: Susan Gal 1. Introduction - Linguistic Society of …...Susan Gal 1. Introduction The historic silence of women in public life, and womenrs atternpts to gain a voice in politics and

3 8

W i I l i a m s , R . 1 - g 7 3 B a s e a n d s u p e r s t r u c t u r e i n M a r x i s tc u l t u r a l t h e o r y . N e w L e f t R e v i e w 8 2 z 3 - 1 6 .

W i I l i s , P . ] - 9 7 7 L e a r n i n g t o I a b o r . S a x o n H o u s e : W e s t m e a d ,E n q I a n d .

I